-
Digital holography is one of the most widely used quantitative phase imaging technologies at present, owing to its non-contact, high-accuracy and full-filed measurement. However, when the optical path difference induced by the measurement sample is larger than the used wavelength, a phase unwrapping algorithm has to be utilized to unwrap the phase and retrieve the actual phase. And the existing phase unwrapping algorithms suffer huge computational burden and slow retrieval speed. Although they have been greatly improved, their retrieval speed is limited by the phase unwrapping. In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, a digital differentiation-integration based phase unwrapping is proposed in this paper. This algorithm is based on the fact that the actual phase information is contained in the complex-valued function after Fourier transform, band-pass filter and inverse Fourier transform. After Fourier transform, band-pass filter and inverse Fourier transform, a complex-valued function containing the actual phase is retrieved, and two sub complex-valued functions can be extracted with just one-pixel shift digitally. Then, two functions are divided pixel by pixel, and another complex-valued function containing the differentiation of the actual phase is obtained. So the differential phase can be retrieved easily by the phase extraction. Finally, the retrieved differential phase is integrated along the inverse direction of shifting, and the unwrapped phase can be obtained directly. This algorithm can work effectively when the variation of the measurement phase is in a range of (–π, π]. This algorithm is just based on the Fourier transform and the complex-valued division. Unlike the existing unwrapping algorithms, this algorithm is much easier to conduct and has light computation burden. Therefore, this algorithm can realize fast and accurate phase reconstruction directly. Several simulation and experimental results can verify the effectiveness of this algorithm.
-
Keywords:
- off-axis digital holography /
- phase retrieval /
- Fourier transform /
- phase unwrapping
[1] Popescu G, Ikeda T, Dasari R R, Feld M S 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 775Google Scholar
[2] Du Y Z, Feng G Y, Li H R, Vargas J, Zhou S H 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 3927Google Scholar
[3] Shaked N T 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 2016Google Scholar
[4] Gabai H, Baranes-Zeevi M, Zilberman M, Shaked N T 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 3017Google Scholar
[5] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2014 Light Sci. Appl. 3 e151Google Scholar
[6] Mahajan S, Trivedi V, Vora P, Chhaniwal V, Javidi B, Anand A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3743Google Scholar
[7] Nativ A, Shaked N T 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1492Google Scholar
[8] Jiao Y H, Kandel M E, Liu X J, Lu W L, Popescu G 2020 Opt. Express 28 34190Google Scholar
[9] Rajput S K, Matoba O, Kumar M, Quan X Y, Awatsuji Y 2021 Opt. Las. Eng. 137 106331Google Scholar
[10] Zhang J W, Dai S Q, Ma C J, Xi T L, Di J L, Zhao J L 2021 Light Adv. Manuf. 2 333Google Scholar
[11] Barojas-Gutierrez E, Flores-Meneses C, Meneses-Fabian C 2023 Opt. Las. Tech. 157 108691Google Scholar
[12] Pham H V, Edwards C, Goddard L V, Popescu G 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 A97Google Scholar
[13] Hao B G, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Diao M, Wang Y, Zhang Y B 2015 J. Opt. 17 035602Google Scholar
[14] Gao P, Harder I, Nercissian V, Mantel K, Yao B L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 712Google Scholar
[15] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Opt. Las. Eng.75 1Google Scholar
[16] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 9513Google Scholar
[17] Huang Z Z, Memmolo P, Ferraro P, Cao L C 2022 PhotoniX 3 3Google Scholar
[18] 钟志, 赵婉婷, 单明广, 刘磊 2021 70 154202Google Scholar
Zhong Z, Zhao W T, Shan M G, Liu L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154202Google Scholar
[19] Ma L H, Li Y, Wang H, Jin H Z 2012 Appl. Opt. 51 8800Google Scholar
[20] Arevalillo-Herráez M, Villatoro F, Gdeisat M 2016 IEEE T. Image Process. 25 2601Google Scholar
[21] de Souza J C, Oliveira M E, dos Santos P A M 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3456Google Scholar
[22] Pritt M D, Shipman J S 1994 IEEE T. Geosci. Remote 32 706Google Scholar
[23] Li B Y, Tang C, Zhou Q L, Lei Z K 2019 Appl. Opt. 58 219Google Scholar
[24] Wei C, Ma J, Miao X Y, Wang N F, Zong Y, Yuan C J 2022 Opt. Express 30 1686Google Scholar
[25] Spoorthi G E, Gorthi R K S S, Gorthi S 2020 IEEE T. Image Process. 29 4862Google Scholar
[26] Wang K Q, Qian K M, Di J L, Zhao J L 2022 Adv. Photonics Nexus 1 014001Google Scholar
[27] Xu M, Tang C, Shen Y X, Hong N, Lei Z K 2022 Opt. Las. Eng. 151 106824Google Scholar
[28] Zhong Z, Wang C, Liu L, Yu L, Shan M G 2022 J. Mod. Optics 69 219Google Scholar
-
图 2 (a) Peak值相位型物体及其(b)离轴全息图; (c)傅里叶变换法的恢复结果; 使用(d)枝切法和 (e)最小二乘法的解包裹结果; (f)本文所提算法的恢复结果
Figure 2. (a) Phase object with peak values and (b) its off-axis hologram; (c) the retrieved result of the Fourier transform; the unwrapped results by (d) branch-cut and (e) least square; (f) the retrieved result of this proposed algorithm.
Figure 3. One-dimensional (1D) phase profile along the black dashed lines in Figs. 2 (d)—(f).
Figure 7. 1D phase profile along the black dashed lines in Fig. 6 (b)-(d).
表 1 三种算法比较
Table 1. Comparison of three algorithms.
时间/s 256 ×256 512×512 1024×1024 枝切法 0.0223 0.0850 0.3744 最小二乘法 0.0069 0.0242 0.0798 本文算法 0.0031 0.0087 0.0293 -
[1] Popescu G, Ikeda T, Dasari R R, Feld M S 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 775Google Scholar
[2] Du Y Z, Feng G Y, Li H R, Vargas J, Zhou S H 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 3927Google Scholar
[3] Shaked N T 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 2016Google Scholar
[4] Gabai H, Baranes-Zeevi M, Zilberman M, Shaked N T 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 3017Google Scholar
[5] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2014 Light Sci. Appl. 3 e151Google Scholar
[6] Mahajan S, Trivedi V, Vora P, Chhaniwal V, Javidi B, Anand A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3743Google Scholar
[7] Nativ A, Shaked N T 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1492Google Scholar
[8] Jiao Y H, Kandel M E, Liu X J, Lu W L, Popescu G 2020 Opt. Express 28 34190Google Scholar
[9] Rajput S K, Matoba O, Kumar M, Quan X Y, Awatsuji Y 2021 Opt. Las. Eng. 137 106331Google Scholar
[10] Zhang J W, Dai S Q, Ma C J, Xi T L, Di J L, Zhao J L 2021 Light Adv. Manuf. 2 333Google Scholar
[11] Barojas-Gutierrez E, Flores-Meneses C, Meneses-Fabian C 2023 Opt. Las. Tech. 157 108691Google Scholar
[12] Pham H V, Edwards C, Goddard L V, Popescu G 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 A97Google Scholar
[13] Hao B G, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Diao M, Wang Y, Zhang Y B 2015 J. Opt. 17 035602Google Scholar
[14] Gao P, Harder I, Nercissian V, Mantel K, Yao B L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 712Google Scholar
[15] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Opt. Las. Eng.75 1Google Scholar
[16] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 9513Google Scholar
[17] Huang Z Z, Memmolo P, Ferraro P, Cao L C 2022 PhotoniX 3 3Google Scholar
[18] 钟志, 赵婉婷, 单明广, 刘磊 2021 70 154202Google Scholar
Zhong Z, Zhao W T, Shan M G, Liu L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 154202Google Scholar
[19] Ma L H, Li Y, Wang H, Jin H Z 2012 Appl. Opt. 51 8800Google Scholar
[20] Arevalillo-Herráez M, Villatoro F, Gdeisat M 2016 IEEE T. Image Process. 25 2601Google Scholar
[21] de Souza J C, Oliveira M E, dos Santos P A M 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3456Google Scholar
[22] Pritt M D, Shipman J S 1994 IEEE T. Geosci. Remote 32 706Google Scholar
[23] Li B Y, Tang C, Zhou Q L, Lei Z K 2019 Appl. Opt. 58 219Google Scholar
[24] Wei C, Ma J, Miao X Y, Wang N F, Zong Y, Yuan C J 2022 Opt. Express 30 1686Google Scholar
[25] Spoorthi G E, Gorthi R K S S, Gorthi S 2020 IEEE T. Image Process. 29 4862Google Scholar
[26] Wang K Q, Qian K M, Di J L, Zhao J L 2022 Adv. Photonics Nexus 1 014001Google Scholar
[27] Xu M, Tang C, Shen Y X, Hong N, Lei Z K 2022 Opt. Las. Eng. 151 106824Google Scholar
[28] Zhong Z, Wang C, Liu L, Yu L, Shan M G 2022 J. Mod. Optics 69 219Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2654
- PDF Downloads: 67
- Cited By: 0