-
With the complexity of problems in reality increasing, the sizes of deep learning neural networks, including the number of layers, neurons, and connections, are increasing in an explosive way. Optimizing hyperparameters to improve the prediction performance of neural networks has become an important task. In literatures, the methods of finding optimal parameters, such as sensitivity pruning and grid search, are complicated and cost a large amount of computation time. In this paper, a hyperparameter optimization strategy called junk neuron deletion is proposed. A neuron with small mean weight in the weight matrix can be ignored in the prediction, and is defined subsequently as a junk neuron. This strategy is to obtain a simplified network structure by deleting the junk neurons, to effectively shorten the computation time and improve the prediction accuracy and model the generalization capability. The LSTM model is used to train the time series data generated by Logistic, Henon and Rossler dynamical systems, and the relatively optimal parameter combination is obtained by grid search with a certain step length. The partial weight matrix that can influence the model output is extracted under this parameter combination, and the neurons with smaller mean weights are eliminated with different thresholds. It is found that using the weighted mean value of 0.1 as the threshold, the identification and deletion of junk neurons can significantly improve the prediction efficiency. Increasing the threshold accuracy will gradually fall back to the initial level, but with the same prediction effect, more operating costs will be saved. Further reduction will result in prediction ability lower than the initial level due to lack of fitting. Using this strategy, the prediction performance of LSTM model for several typical chaotic dynamical systems is improved significantly.
-
Keywords:
- LSTM /
- chaotic time series prediction /
- hyperparameter optimization /
- junk neuron deletion strategy
[1] 邓帅 2019 计算机应用研究 36 1984
Deng S 2019 Appl. Res. Comput. 36 1984
[2] 邵恩泽, 吴正勇, 王灿 2020 工业控制计算机 33 11Google Scholar
Shao E Z, Wu Z Y, Wang C 2020 Ind. Contrl. Comput. 33 11Google Scholar
[3] 乔俊飞, 樊瑞元, 韩红桂, 阮晓钢 2010 控制理论与应用 27 111
Qiao J F, Fan R Y, Han H G, Ruan X G 2010 Contl. Theor. Appl. 27 111
[4] 陈国茗, 于腾腾, 刘新为 2021 数值计算与计算机应用 42 215Google Scholar
Chen G M, Yu T T, Liu X W 2021 J. Num. Method. Comp. Appl. 42 215Google Scholar
[5] 魏德志, 陈福集, 郑小雪 2015 64 110503Google Scholar
Wei D Z, Chen F J, Zheng X X 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 110503Google Scholar
[6] 王新迎, 韩敏 2015 64 070504Google Scholar
Wang X Y, Han M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin 64 070504Google Scholar
[7] 黄伟建, 李永涛, 黄远 2021 70 010501Google Scholar
Huang W J, Li Y T, Huang Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 010501Google Scholar
[8] Yamaguti Y, Tsuda I 2021 Chaos 31 013137Google Scholar
[9] Graves A 2013 arXiv: 1308.0850 [cs. NE]
[10] Johnston D E 1978 Proc 8 th BHRA Int Conf Fluid Sealing Durham, UK, 1978 pC1-1
[11] Sezer O B, Gudelek M U, Ozbayoglu A M 2020 Appl. Soft Comput. J. 90 106181Google Scholar
[12] 甘文娟, 陈永红, 韩静, 王亚飞 2020 计算机系统应用 29 212Google Scholar
Gan W J, Chen Y H, Han J, Wang Y F 2020 Comput. Syst. Appl. 29 212Google Scholar
[13] Farmelo G 2002 It Must Be Beautiful: Great Equations of Modern Science (London: Granta Publications) pp28–45
[14] Grassberger P, Procaccia I 1983 Physica D 9 189Google Scholar
[15] Nauenberg M 1983 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 410 317Google Scholar
[16] 张中华, 丁华福 2009 计算机技术与发展 19 185Google Scholar
Zhang Z H, Ding H F 2009 Comput. Technol. Dev. 19 185Google Scholar
[17] Butcher J C 1967 J. ACM 14 84Google Scholar
[18] Liu C, Yin S Q, Zhang M, Zeng Y, Liu J Y 2014 Appl. Mech. Mater. 644-650 2216
[19] Bao Y K, Liu Z T 2006 LNCS 4224 504
[20] Ou Y Y, Chen G H, Oyang Y J 2006 LNCS 4099 1017
-
表 1 模型参数及结果
Table 1. Parameters and results of the models.
模型 train test win L1 L2 D1 D2 准确率 Logistic
(μ = 3.6)5000 15 22 16 4 4 1 82.90% Logistic
(μ = 3.7)5000 15 22 16 4 4 1 70.70% Logistic
(μ = 3.8)5000 15 2 20 4 4 1 68.60% Logistic
(μ = 3.9)5000 15 2 16 4 2 1 60.00% Logistic
(μ = 3.99)5000 15 2 16 4 4 1 57.10% Henon 5000 15 2 22 2 2 1 67.10% Rossler 5000 15 2 16 4 4 1 77.10% 表 2 权重结构拆分
Table 2. Weight structure resolution.
结构 起始点 终点 input_gate 0 units forget_gate units 2×units cell 2×units 3×units output_gate 3×units 4×units 表 3 输出门权重矩阵图
Table 3. Heat diagram of output door’s weights.
w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 w7 w8 w9 w10 w11 w12 w13 w14 w15 w16 x1 0.032129 0.144328 0.007293 0.003557 0.070465 0.011652 0.11142 0.048287 0.105727 0.039649 0.010162 0.119949 0.0771 0.126937 0.001947 0.089396 x2 0.070867 0.013232 0.054503 0.073496 0.005734 0.064071 0.145835 0.083217 0.025553 0.033065 0.113584 0.028327 0.054085 0.177761 0.010123 0.046546 x3 0.083647 0.046366 0.066226 0.044534 0.010054 0.077919 0.071001 0.018548 0.035294 0.071642 0.053888 0.028448 0.102273 0.096744 0.078535 0.114879 x4 0.039123 0.113002 0.161581 0.113866 0.070651 0.085571 0.01836 0.015408 0.032978 0.018375 0.068342 0.059137 0.00701 0.070451 0.032602 0.099853 x5 0.013762 0.055823 0.147481 0.055493 0.093444 0.027264 0.082384 0.058674 0.032903 0.033342 0.045937 0.035937 0.110378 0.004487 0.161653 0.041037 x6 0.038079 0.089649 0.013102 0.021696 0.042833 0.109787 0.001024 0.0673 0.036916 0.134038 0.066291 0.146953 0.009803 0.081372 0.098701 0.042456 x7 0.013865 0.001702 0.057869 0.072264 0.104456 0.029761 0.062669 0.07539 0.05715 0.102282 0.017876 0.012626 0.020022 0.100243 0.153076 0.11875 x8 0.002042 0.006925 0.060008 0.13031 0.136406 0.056203 0.061606 0.028064 0.006926 0.099129 0.055122 0.117276 0.06846 0.014505 0.078184 0.078834 x9 0.044205 0.171724 0.153162 0.13818 0.029189 0.025947 0.049391 0.012338 0.100584 0.028133 0.004946 0.017914 0.008463 0.014741 0.066944 0.134139 x10 0.094619 0.0563 0.040223 0.096283 0.10152 0.145036 0.051991 0.075623 0.075216 0.061209 0.057986 0.066076 0.004787 0.01945 0.042341 0.011339 x11 0.078909 0.005603 0.08149 0.125202 0.069081 0.10143 0.122451 0.027058 0.057647 0.016226 0.03275 0.050667 0.036795 0.11072 0.081767 0.002204 x12 0.046159 0.005688 0.006237 0.004618 0.014815 0.005272 0.04598 0.037005 0.190933 0.065535 0.005131 0.015155 0.065812 0.099804 0.172294 0.21956 x13 0.111226 0.027026 0.027497 0.074868 0.139154 0.084413 0.080342 0.038769 0.088824 0.047083 0.056548 0.002081 0.10549 0.049929 0.020529 0.04622 x14 0.092772 0.03999 0.055938 0.128114 0.036386 0.013061 0.083943 0.051033 0.106374 0.007257 0.063049 0.091929 0.084821 0.020458 0.089496 0.035379 x15 0.131586 0.038161 0.176303 0.041758 0.049173 0.096633 0.0033 0.045529 0.084262 0.050839 0.003322 0.063406 0.029601 0.045323 0.116047 0.024757 x16 0.070289 0.05378 0.092472 0.03372 0.052087 0.110236 0.055639 0.124221 0.029371 0.06142 0.04904 0.043376 0.012261 0.041226 0.109564 0.061299 均
值0.060205 0.054331 0.075087 0.072372 0.064091 0.065266 0.065459 0.050404 0.066666 0.054326 0.043998 0.056204 0.049428 0.067134 0.082113 0.072915 表 4 μ = 3.99时不同参数的预测准确率
Table 4. The prediction accuracy of different parameters when μ = 3.99.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.09 0.1 0.11 L1 16 15 12 10 准确率 57.10% 59.30% 56.40% 51.40% 表 5 神经元数及预测准确率变化表
Table 5. Table of neuron numbers and prediction accuracy.
模型 调整前L1 调整后L1 调整前准确率 调整后准确率 神经元数调整 准确率变化趋势 Logistic
(μ = 3.6)16 15 82.90% 90.70% –1 Logistic
(μ = 3.7)16 13 70.70% 71.40% –3 Logistic
(μ = 3.8)20 16 68.60% 68.60% –4 Logistic
(μ = 3.9)16 12 60.00% 60.00% –4 Logistic
(μ = 3.99)16 15 57.10% 59.30% –1 Henon 22 21 67.10% 70.00% –1 Rossler 16 14 77.10% 83.60% –2 表 6 μ = 3.6 时不同参数的预测准确率
Table 6. The prediction accuracy of different parameters when μ = 3.6.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.08 0.09 0.095 L1 16 15 12 10 准确率 82.90% 90.70% 87.90% 78.60% 表 7 μ = 3.7 时不同参数的预测准确率
Table 7. The prediction accuracy of different parameters when μ = 3.7.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.075 0.09 0.105 L1 16 13 11 9 准确率 70.70% 71.40% 65.00% 60.70% 表 8 μ = 3.8时不同参数的预测准确率
Table 8. The prediction accuracy of different parameters when μ = 3.8.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.085 0.095 0.105 L1 20 18 16 12 准确率 68.60% 68.60% 68.60% 65.00% 表 9 μ = 3.9 时不同参数的预测准确率
Table 9. The prediction accuracy of different parameters when μ = 3.9.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.09 0.095 0.1 L1 16 14 12 10 准确率 60.00% 60.00% 60.00% 55.00% 表 10 Henon系统取不同参数的预测准确率
Table 10. Prediction accuracy of Henon system for different parameters.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.14 L1 22 21 19 16 14 准确率 67.10% 70.00% 66.40% 65.70% 65.00% 表 11 Rossler系统取不同参数的预测准确率
Table 11. Prediction accuracy of Rossler system for different parameters.
指标 调整前 以各权重阀值调整后 变化趋势 0.085 0.095 0.105 0.115 L1 16 14 12 11 8 准确率 77.10% 83.60% 81.40% 80.70% 71.40% -
[1] 邓帅 2019 计算机应用研究 36 1984
Deng S 2019 Appl. Res. Comput. 36 1984
[2] 邵恩泽, 吴正勇, 王灿 2020 工业控制计算机 33 11Google Scholar
Shao E Z, Wu Z Y, Wang C 2020 Ind. Contrl. Comput. 33 11Google Scholar
[3] 乔俊飞, 樊瑞元, 韩红桂, 阮晓钢 2010 控制理论与应用 27 111
Qiao J F, Fan R Y, Han H G, Ruan X G 2010 Contl. Theor. Appl. 27 111
[4] 陈国茗, 于腾腾, 刘新为 2021 数值计算与计算机应用 42 215Google Scholar
Chen G M, Yu T T, Liu X W 2021 J. Num. Method. Comp. Appl. 42 215Google Scholar
[5] 魏德志, 陈福集, 郑小雪 2015 64 110503Google Scholar
Wei D Z, Chen F J, Zheng X X 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 110503Google Scholar
[6] 王新迎, 韩敏 2015 64 070504Google Scholar
Wang X Y, Han M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin 64 070504Google Scholar
[7] 黄伟建, 李永涛, 黄远 2021 70 010501Google Scholar
Huang W J, Li Y T, Huang Y 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 010501Google Scholar
[8] Yamaguti Y, Tsuda I 2021 Chaos 31 013137Google Scholar
[9] Graves A 2013 arXiv: 1308.0850 [cs. NE]
[10] Johnston D E 1978 Proc 8 th BHRA Int Conf Fluid Sealing Durham, UK, 1978 pC1-1
[11] Sezer O B, Gudelek M U, Ozbayoglu A M 2020 Appl. Soft Comput. J. 90 106181Google Scholar
[12] 甘文娟, 陈永红, 韩静, 王亚飞 2020 计算机系统应用 29 212Google Scholar
Gan W J, Chen Y H, Han J, Wang Y F 2020 Comput. Syst. Appl. 29 212Google Scholar
[13] Farmelo G 2002 It Must Be Beautiful: Great Equations of Modern Science (London: Granta Publications) pp28–45
[14] Grassberger P, Procaccia I 1983 Physica D 9 189Google Scholar
[15] Nauenberg M 1983 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 410 317Google Scholar
[16] 张中华, 丁华福 2009 计算机技术与发展 19 185Google Scholar
Zhang Z H, Ding H F 2009 Comput. Technol. Dev. 19 185Google Scholar
[17] Butcher J C 1967 J. ACM 14 84Google Scholar
[18] Liu C, Yin S Q, Zhang M, Zeng Y, Liu J Y 2014 Appl. Mech. Mater. 644-650 2216
[19] Bao Y K, Liu Z T 2006 LNCS 4224 504
[20] Ou Y Y, Chen G H, Oyang Y J 2006 LNCS 4099 1017
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4114
- PDF Downloads: 70
- Cited By: 0