-
The tokamak with weak or negative magnetic shear and internal transport barrier (ITB) is considered to be the most promising approach to improving fusion performance. The hollow current density profile, as well as the reversed q profile (negative magnetic shear), is one of the key conditions for improving core confinement in advanced tokamak schemes. In the Huanliuqi 2A (HL-2A) experiment, a hollow current distribution with a discharge duration of about 100 ms is successfully achieved by injecting the pellets in the Ohmic discharge. The discharge is characteristic of circular equilibrium configuration and three frozen pellets are injected continuously at three different time moments. As a result, the hollow current profiles are formed in the plasma with weak hollow electron temperature in the core region. At the same time, the hollow currents are combined with the reversed magnetic shear profiles. Because the power of Ohmic heating is not so high and there is no external auxiliary heating, we can see only a trend of the formation of weak internal transport barrier in the stable hollow current discharge stage. However, the electron thermal diffusivity decreases significantly after the pellets have been injected. The deep injection of frozen pellets improves the energy confinement. The enhancement of plasma performance is due to the peaked electron density profile in the center, caused by pellet injection and the negative magnetic shear in the plasma center. It is concluded that the electron density profile peaked highly in the core plasma, caused by pellet injection, is beneficial to the improvement of particle confinement and plays an important role in enhancing the energy confinement. In addition, it is also demonstrated that, in general, during a hollow current discharge, the poloidal beta
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{p}} $ value and normalized beta$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{N}} $ value are both obviously low although the reversed magnetic shear is conducive to stabilizing ballooning modes and weakening the drift instabilities. However, comparing with the hollow current profile, the plasma with peaked current profile is very beneficial to the improvement of beta limit. In order to improve the$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{N}} $ limit, a conductive wall is necessary to be placed near the plasma boundary. The results of HL-2A pellet injection experiments present a possibility of obtaining high parameter discharge on a limiter tokamak.[1] Strait E J, Lao L L, Mauel M E, Rice B W, Taylor T S, Burrell K H, Chu M S, Lazarus E A, Osborne T H, Thompson S J, Turnbull A D, 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4421
Google Scholar
[2] Turnbull A D, Taylor T S, Lin-Liu Y R, John H S 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 718
Google Scholar
[3] Jackson G L, Winter J, Taylor T S, Burrell K H, DeBoo J C, Greenfield C M, Groebner R J, Hodapp T, Holtrop K, Lazarus E A, Lao L L, Lippmann S I, Osborne T H, Petrie T W, Phillips J, James R, Schissel D P, Strait E J, Turnbull A D, West W P 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 3098
Google Scholar
[4] Levinton F M, Zarnstorff M C, Batha S H, Bell M, Bell R E, Budny R V, Bush C, Chang Z, Fredrickson E, Janos A, Manickam J, Ramsey A, Sabbagh S A, Schmidt G L, Synakowski E J, Taylor G 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4417
Google Scholar
[5] Kessel C, Manickam J, Rewoldt G, Tang W M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1212
Google Scholar
[6] Hawkes N C, Stratton B C, Tala T, Challis C D, Conway G, DeAngelis R, Giroud C, Hobirk J, Joffrin E, Lomas P, Lotte P, Mailloux J, Mazon D, Rachlew E, Reyes-Cortes S, Solano E, Zastrow K D 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 115001
Google Scholar
[7] Yavorskij V, Goloborod’ko V, Schoepf K, Sharapov S E, Challi C D, Reznik S, Stork D 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 1077
Google Scholar
[8] Zarnstorff M C, Bell M G, Bitter M, Goldston R J, Grek B, Hawryluk R J, Hill K, Johnson D, McCune D, Park H, Ramsey A, Taylor G, Wieland R 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1306
Google Scholar
[9] Fujita T, Kamada Y, Ishida S, Neyatani Y, Oikawa T, Ide S, Takeji S, Koide Y, Isayama A, Fukuda T, Hatae T, Ishii Y, Ozeki T, Shirai H, JT-60 Team 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1627
Google Scholar
[10] Sengoku S, Nagami M, Abe M, Hoshino K, Kameari A, Kitsunezaki A, Konoshima S, Matoba T, Oikawa A, Shimada M, Suzuki N, Takahashi H, Tani K, Washizu M, Foster C A, Milora S L, Attenberger S E, Stockdale R E 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1475
Google Scholar
[11] Yan L W, Xiao Z G, Zheng Y J, Dong J F, Deng Z C, Li B, Li L, Feng Z, Liu Y, Wang E Y 2002 Nucl. Fusion 42 265
Google Scholar
[12] Ding X T, Yang Q W, Yan L W, Zhu G L, Xiao Z G, Liu D Q, Cao Z, Gao Q D, Long Y X, Liu Yi, Zhou Y, Pan Y D, Cui Z Y, Huang Y, Liu Z T, Shi Z B, Ji X Q, Xiao W W, Liu Y 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2502
Google Scholar
[13] Valovič M, Garzotti L, Gurl C, Akers R, Harrison J, Michael C, Naylor G, Scannell R 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 114022
Google Scholar
[14] 刘春华, 聂林, 黄渊, 季小全, 余德良, 刘仪, 冯震, 姚可, 崔正英, 严龙文, 丁玄同, 董家齐, 段旭如 2012 61 205201
Google Scholar
Liu C H, Nie L, Huang Y, Ji X Q, Yu D L, Liu Yi, Feng Z, Yao K, Cui Z Y, Yan L W, Ding X T, Dong J Q, Duan X R 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 205201
Google Scholar
[15] Furth H P 1986 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 28 1305
Google Scholar
[16] Hugon M, Milligen B Ph van, Smeulders P, Appel LC, Bartlett DV, Boucher D, Edwards AW, Eriksson L-G, Gowers C W, Hender T C, Huysmans G, Jacquinot J J, Kupschus P, Porte L, Rebut P H, Start D F H, Tibone F, Tubbing B J D, Watkins M L, Zwingmann W 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 33
Google Scholar
[17] Nagami M 1989 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31 1597
Google Scholar
[18] Jayakumar R J, Austin M A, Greenfield C M, Hawkes N C, Kinsey J E, Lao L L, Parks P B, Solano E R, Taylor T S 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 015004
Google Scholar
[19] Liu Yi, Qiu X M, Dong Y B, Guo G C, Xiao Z G, Zhong Y Z, Zheng Y J, Fu B Z, Dong J F, Liu Yong, Wang E Y 2004 Plasma Phys. Controled Fusion 46 455
Google Scholar
[20] Shen Y, Dong J Q, He H D, Shi Z B, Li J, Han M K, Li J Q, Sun A P, Pan L 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 124001
Google Scholar
[21] Tala T J J, Parail V V, Becoulet A, Challis C D, Corrigan G, Hawkes N C, Heading D J, Mantsinen M J, Nowak S 2002 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 44 1181
Google Scholar
[22] Litaudon X, Peysson Y, Aniel T, Huysmans G, Imbeaux F, Joffrin E, Lasalle J, Lotte P, Schunke B, Segui J L, Tresset G, Zabiego M 2001 Plasma Phys. Controlled. Fusion 43 677
Google Scholar
[23] Challis C D, Litaudon X, Tresset G, Baranov Yu F, Bécoulet A, Giroud C, Hawkes N C, Howell D F, Joffrin E, Lomas P J, Mailloux J, Mantsinen M J, Stratton B C, Ward D J, Zastrow K D 2002 Plasma Phys. Controlled. Fusion 44 1031
Google Scholar
[24] Fujita T, Oikawa T, Suzuki T, Ide S, Sakamoto Y, Koide Y, Hatae T, Naito O, Isayama A, Hayashi N, Shirai H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 245001
Google Scholar
[25] Lao L L, Ferron J R, Groebner R J, Howl W, John H St, Strait E J, Taylor T S 1990 Nucl. Fusion 30 1035
Google Scholar
[26] Lao L L, John H St, Stambaugh R D, Kellman A G, Pfeiffer W 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611
[27] He H D, Dong J Q, Zheng G Y, He Z X, Lu G M, Peng X D, Shi Z B, Zhang J H 2012 Phys. Scr. 85 045501
Google Scholar
[28] Gruber R, Troyon F, Berger D, Bernard L C, Rousset S, Schreiber R, Schneider W, Roberts K V 1981 Comput. Phys. Commun. 21 323
Google Scholar
[29] Smeulders P, Appel L C, Balet B, Hender T C, Lauro-Taroni L, Stork D, Wolle B, Ali-Arshad S, Alper B, Blank H J De, Bures M, Esch B De, Giannella R, Konig R, Kupschus P, Lawson K, Marcus F B, Mattioli M, Morsi H W, O'Brien D P, O'Rourke J, Sadler G J, Schmidt G L, Stubberfield P M, Zwingmann W 1995 Nucl. Fusion 35 225
[30] Dong J Q, Horton W 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 3412
Google Scholar
[31] 沈勇, 董家齐, 徐红兵 2018 67 195203
Google Scholar
Shen Y, Dong J Q, Xu H B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 195203
Google Scholar
[32] Rebut P-H, Watkins M L, Gambier D J, Boucheret D 1992 Phys. Fluids B 3 2209
[33] Maget P, Garbet X, Géraud A, Joffrin E 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 949
Google Scholar
[34] Gao Q D, Budny R V, Zhang J H, Li F Z, Jiao Y M 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 1897
Google Scholar
[35] 沈勇, 董家齐, 何宏达 2016 真空科学与技术学报 36 447
Shen Y, Dong J Q, He H D 2016 Chin. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 36 447
[36] Gao Q D, Budny R V, Li F, Zhang J 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 982
Google Scholar
-
图 1 典型弹丸注入放电(4050炮)参数的时间演化 (a)等离子体电流
$ {I}_{\mathrm{p}} $ ; (b)环电压$ {V}_{\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}} $ ; (c)纵向磁场$ {B}_{\mathrm{t}} $ ; (d)欧姆电流$ {I}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{h}} $ ; (e) 垂直场线圈电流$ {I}_{\mathrm{v}} $ ; (f) 水平场线圈电流$ {I}_{\mathrm{r}} $ ; (g) 线平均电子密度$ {\bar {n}}_{\mathrm{e}} $ Figure 1. Temporal evolutions of the typical pellet injection discharge: (a) Plasma current
$ {I}_{\mathrm{p}} $ ; (b) loop voltage$ {V}_{\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}} $ ; (c) longitudinal magnetic field$ {B}_{\mathrm{t}} $ ; (d) Ohmic current$ {I}_{\mathrm{o}\mathrm{h}} $ ; (e) vertical field coil current$ {I}_{\mathrm{v}} $ ; (f) horizontal field coil current$ {I}_{\mathrm{r}} $ ; (g) average line electron density$ {\bar {n}}_{\mathrm{e}} $ .
图 2 性能参数图 (a)极向
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{p}} $ 和能量约束时间$ {\tau }_{\mathrm{E}} $ 的时间演化; (b)离子温度$ {T}_{\mathrm{i}} $ 和热辐射强度$ {I}_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}} $ 的时间演化; (c)电子热扩散系数$ {\chi }_{\mathrm{e}} $ 的时间演化, 其中阴影部分表示3次弹丸注入时间段Figure 2. Performance parameters: (a) The Poloidal
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{p}} $ and energy confinement time$ {\tau }_{\mathrm{E}} $ ; (b) ion temperature$ {T}_{\mathrm{i}} $ and thermal radiation intensity$ {I}_{\mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}} $ ; (c) electron thermal diffusivity$ {\chi }_{\mathrm{e}} $ , where the shaded area represents the time period of the three pellet injections.
图 3 不同通道的软X射线强度图, 从上到下曲线对应的
$ r=2.5 $ ,$ 7.3 $ , 12 和$ 16.3 $ cmFigure 3. Soft X-ray intensity diagram of different channels, where the curves from top to bottom correspond to
$ r=2.5\;, $ $ 7.3\;, $ 12 and 6.3 cm.
图 4 放电位形图
Figure 4. Discharge configuration diagram.
图 5 电子密度(a) 与电子温度(b) 的空间分布图
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of electron density (a) and electron temperature (b).
图 6
$ t=702, \;713, \;782, \;902 $ ms时的(a)电子温度剖面、(b)电子密度剖面和(c)电流剖面Figure 6. Electron temperature (a), electron density (b) and current (c) profiles at
$ t=\mathrm{702, 713}, \;782 $ and$ 902 $ ms.
图 7
$ t=702 $ 和$ 713 $ ms时的动理学剖面图 (a), (b) 电子温度; (c), (d) 电子密度; (e), (f) q剖面; (g), (h) 平均电流密度$ \left\langle{{j}_{t}}\right\rangle $ Figure 7. Kinetic profiles at t = 702 and 713 ms: (a), (b) Electron temperature; (c), (d) electron density; (e), (f) q profiles; (g), (h) average current density
$ \left\langle{{j}_{t}}\right\rangle $ profile.
图 8
$ t=750, 782, 902 $ ms 时, (a) 电流密度$ \left\langle{{j}_{t}}\right\rangle $ 、(b) 安全因子q、(c)压强梯度$ \mathrm{d}P/\mathrm{d}\psi $ 剖面图. (b)中的“o”表示$ 900 $ ms时刻q测量值, 与重建的q剖面相应点基本重合Figure 8. : (a) Current density
$ \left\langle{{j}_{\mathrm{t}}}\right\rangle $ , (b) safety factor q, (c) pressure gradient$ \mathrm{d}P/\mathrm{d}\psi $ at$ t=710, \;782 $ and$ 902 $ ms. And the symbols “o” in panel (b) represent the measured q values.
图 9
$ t=782\;\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s}, {q}_{0}=3.2 $ 时, (a)不同$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{p}} $ 平衡位形的q剖面、(b)归一化增长率.Figure 9. (a) Different q profiles and (b) normalized growth rates for different
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{p}} $ at$ t=782\;\mathrm{m}\mathrm{s} $ and$ {q}_{0}=3.2 $ .
图 10 EFIT重建的稳定平衡的深反转q剖面及平均电流密度
$ \left\langle{{j}_{t}}\right\rangle $ 分布Figure 10. Stable equilibrium deeply inverted q profile and average current density
$ \left\langle{{j}_{t}}\right\rangle $ for the stable equilibrium reconstructed by EFIT.
图 11
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{N}} $ 随时间演化图Figure 11. Temporal evolution of
$ {\beta }_{\mathrm{N}} $ . -
[1] Strait E J, Lao L L, Mauel M E, Rice B W, Taylor T S, Burrell K H, Chu M S, Lazarus E A, Osborne T H, Thompson S J, Turnbull A D, 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4421
Google Scholar
[2] Turnbull A D, Taylor T S, Lin-Liu Y R, John H S 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 718
Google Scholar
[3] Jackson G L, Winter J, Taylor T S, Burrell K H, DeBoo J C, Greenfield C M, Groebner R J, Hodapp T, Holtrop K, Lazarus E A, Lao L L, Lippmann S I, Osborne T H, Petrie T W, Phillips J, James R, Schissel D P, Strait E J, Turnbull A D, West W P 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 3098
Google Scholar
[4] Levinton F M, Zarnstorff M C, Batha S H, Bell M, Bell R E, Budny R V, Bush C, Chang Z, Fredrickson E, Janos A, Manickam J, Ramsey A, Sabbagh S A, Schmidt G L, Synakowski E J, Taylor G 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4417
Google Scholar
[5] Kessel C, Manickam J, Rewoldt G, Tang W M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 1212
Google Scholar
[6] Hawkes N C, Stratton B C, Tala T, Challis C D, Conway G, DeAngelis R, Giroud C, Hobirk J, Joffrin E, Lomas P, Lotte P, Mailloux J, Mazon D, Rachlew E, Reyes-Cortes S, Solano E, Zastrow K D 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 115001
Google Scholar
[7] Yavorskij V, Goloborod’ko V, Schoepf K, Sharapov S E, Challi C D, Reznik S, Stork D 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 1077
Google Scholar
[8] Zarnstorff M C, Bell M G, Bitter M, Goldston R J, Grek B, Hawryluk R J, Hill K, Johnson D, McCune D, Park H, Ramsey A, Taylor G, Wieland R 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1306
Google Scholar
[9] Fujita T, Kamada Y, Ishida S, Neyatani Y, Oikawa T, Ide S, Takeji S, Koide Y, Isayama A, Fukuda T, Hatae T, Ishii Y, Ozeki T, Shirai H, JT-60 Team 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 1627
Google Scholar
[10] Sengoku S, Nagami M, Abe M, Hoshino K, Kameari A, Kitsunezaki A, Konoshima S, Matoba T, Oikawa A, Shimada M, Suzuki N, Takahashi H, Tani K, Washizu M, Foster C A, Milora S L, Attenberger S E, Stockdale R E 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1475
Google Scholar
[11] Yan L W, Xiao Z G, Zheng Y J, Dong J F, Deng Z C, Li B, Li L, Feng Z, Liu Y, Wang E Y 2002 Nucl. Fusion 42 265
Google Scholar
[12] Ding X T, Yang Q W, Yan L W, Zhu G L, Xiao Z G, Liu D Q, Cao Z, Gao Q D, Long Y X, Liu Yi, Zhou Y, Pan Y D, Cui Z Y, Huang Y, Liu Z T, Shi Z B, Ji X Q, Xiao W W, Liu Y 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 2502
Google Scholar
[13] Valovič M, Garzotti L, Gurl C, Akers R, Harrison J, Michael C, Naylor G, Scannell R 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 114022
Google Scholar
[14] 刘春华, 聂林, 黄渊, 季小全, 余德良, 刘仪, 冯震, 姚可, 崔正英, 严龙文, 丁玄同, 董家齐, 段旭如 2012 61 205201
Google Scholar
Liu C H, Nie L, Huang Y, Ji X Q, Yu D L, Liu Yi, Feng Z, Yao K, Cui Z Y, Yan L W, Ding X T, Dong J Q, Duan X R 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 205201
Google Scholar
[15] Furth H P 1986 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 28 1305
Google Scholar
[16] Hugon M, Milligen B Ph van, Smeulders P, Appel LC, Bartlett DV, Boucher D, Edwards AW, Eriksson L-G, Gowers C W, Hender T C, Huysmans G, Jacquinot J J, Kupschus P, Porte L, Rebut P H, Start D F H, Tibone F, Tubbing B J D, Watkins M L, Zwingmann W 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 33
Google Scholar
[17] Nagami M 1989 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 31 1597
Google Scholar
[18] Jayakumar R J, Austin M A, Greenfield C M, Hawkes N C, Kinsey J E, Lao L L, Parks P B, Solano E R, Taylor T S 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 015004
Google Scholar
[19] Liu Yi, Qiu X M, Dong Y B, Guo G C, Xiao Z G, Zhong Y Z, Zheng Y J, Fu B Z, Dong J F, Liu Yong, Wang E Y 2004 Plasma Phys. Controled Fusion 46 455
Google Scholar
[20] Shen Y, Dong J Q, He H D, Shi Z B, Li J, Han M K, Li J Q, Sun A P, Pan L 2020 Nucl. Fusion 60 124001
Google Scholar
[21] Tala T J J, Parail V V, Becoulet A, Challis C D, Corrigan G, Hawkes N C, Heading D J, Mantsinen M J, Nowak S 2002 Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 44 1181
Google Scholar
[22] Litaudon X, Peysson Y, Aniel T, Huysmans G, Imbeaux F, Joffrin E, Lasalle J, Lotte P, Schunke B, Segui J L, Tresset G, Zabiego M 2001 Plasma Phys. Controlled. Fusion 43 677
Google Scholar
[23] Challis C D, Litaudon X, Tresset G, Baranov Yu F, Bécoulet A, Giroud C, Hawkes N C, Howell D F, Joffrin E, Lomas P J, Mailloux J, Mantsinen M J, Stratton B C, Ward D J, Zastrow K D 2002 Plasma Phys. Controlled. Fusion 44 1031
Google Scholar
[24] Fujita T, Oikawa T, Suzuki T, Ide S, Sakamoto Y, Koide Y, Hatae T, Naito O, Isayama A, Hayashi N, Shirai H 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 245001
Google Scholar
[25] Lao L L, Ferron J R, Groebner R J, Howl W, John H St, Strait E J, Taylor T S 1990 Nucl. Fusion 30 1035
Google Scholar
[26] Lao L L, John H St, Stambaugh R D, Kellman A G, Pfeiffer W 1985 Nucl. Fusion 25 1611
[27] He H D, Dong J Q, Zheng G Y, He Z X, Lu G M, Peng X D, Shi Z B, Zhang J H 2012 Phys. Scr. 85 045501
Google Scholar
[28] Gruber R, Troyon F, Berger D, Bernard L C, Rousset S, Schreiber R, Schneider W, Roberts K V 1981 Comput. Phys. Commun. 21 323
Google Scholar
[29] Smeulders P, Appel L C, Balet B, Hender T C, Lauro-Taroni L, Stork D, Wolle B, Ali-Arshad S, Alper B, Blank H J De, Bures M, Esch B De, Giannella R, Konig R, Kupschus P, Lawson K, Marcus F B, Mattioli M, Morsi H W, O'Brien D P, O'Rourke J, Sadler G J, Schmidt G L, Stubberfield P M, Zwingmann W 1995 Nucl. Fusion 35 225
[30] Dong J Q, Horton W 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 3412
Google Scholar
[31] 沈勇, 董家齐, 徐红兵 2018 67 195203
Google Scholar
Shen Y, Dong J Q, Xu H B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 195203
Google Scholar
[32] Rebut P-H, Watkins M L, Gambier D J, Boucheret D 1992 Phys. Fluids B 3 2209
[33] Maget P, Garbet X, Géraud A, Joffrin E 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 949
Google Scholar
[34] Gao Q D, Budny R V, Zhang J H, Li F Z, Jiao Y M 2000 Nucl. Fusion 40 1897
Google Scholar
[35] 沈勇, 董家齐, 何宏达 2016 真空科学与技术学报 36 447
Shen Y, Dong J Q, He H D 2016 Chin. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 36 447
[36] Gao Q D, Budny R V, Li F, Zhang J 2003 Nucl. Fusion 43 982
Google Scholar
-
[1] He Yu, Chen Wei-Bin, Hong Bin, Huang Wen-Tao, Zhang Kun, Chen Lei, Feng Xue-Qiang, Li Bo, Liu Guo, Sun Xiao-Han, Zhao Meng, Zhang Yue. Significant role of thermal effects in current-induced exchange bias field switching at antiferromagnet/ferromagnet interface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 027501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231374 [2] Ma Rui-Rui, Chen Liu, Qiu Zhi-Yong. Theoretical studies of low-frequency shear Alfvén waves in reversed shear tokamak plasmas. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(21): 215207. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230255 [3] Xu Ming, Xu Li-Qing, Zhao Hai-Lin, Li Ying-Ying, Zhong Guo-Qiang, Hao Bao-Long, Ma Rui-Rui, Chen Wei, Liu Hai-Qing, Xu Guo-Sheng, Hu Jian-Sheng, Wan Bao-Nian, the EAST Team. Summary of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities and internal transport barriers under condition of qmin $\approx $ 2 in EAST tokamak. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(21): 215204. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230721[4] Xu Feng1\2, Yu Guo-Hao, Deng Xu-Guang, Li Jun-Shuai, Zhang Li, Song Liang, Fan Ya-Ming, Zhang Bao-Shun. Current transport mechanism of Schottky contact of Pt/Au/n-InGaN. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(21): 217802. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181191 [5] Zheng Shu, Zhang Jia-Peng, Duan Ping, Wei Lai, Wang Xian-Qu. Numerical study of double tearing mode instability in viscous plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 025205. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.025205 [6] Yu Huang-Zhong. Measurement of the hole mobility in the blend system by space charge limited current. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(8): 087204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.087204 [7] Gao Kuang-Hong, Wei Lai-Ming, Yu Guo-Lin, Yang Rui, Lin Tie, Wei Yan-Feng, Yang Jian-Rong, Sun Lei, Dai Ning, Chu Jun-Hao. Magnetotransport property of HgCdTe inversion layer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(2): 027301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.027301 [8] Liu Chun-Hua, Nie Lin, Huang Yuan, Ji Xiao-Quan, Yu De-Liang, Liu Yi, Feng Zhen, Yao Ke, Cui Zheng-Ying, Yan Long-Wen, Ding Xuan-Tong, Dong Jia-Qi, Duan Xu-Ru. Preliminary behavior studies of edge localized modes on HL-2A. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 205201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.205201 [9] Du Jian, Wang Su-Xin, Yuan Ai-Guo. Effect of δ barrier on persistent current in a quantum ring with multiple arms. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2767-2774. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2767 [10] Xiu Ming-Xia, Ren Jun-Feng, Wang Yu-Mei, Yuan Xiao-Bo, Hu Gui-Chao. Effect of Schottky barrier on spin injection in ferromagnetic/organic semiconductor structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(12): 8856-8861. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8856 [11] Du Jian, Wang Su-Xin, Yang Shu-Min. Tunneling coefficient and persistent current in triple-arm quantum ring with double δ barrier. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(11): 7926-7933. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7926 [12] Yang Hao, Guo Xia, Guan Bao-Lu, Wang Tong-Xi, Shen Guang-Di. The influence of injection current on transverse mode characteristics of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2959-2965. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2959 [13] Du Jian, Zhang Peng, Liu Ji-Hong, Li Jin-Liang, Li Yu-Xian. Spin-tunneling time and transport in a ferromagnetic/semiconductor/ferromagnetic heterojunction with a δ tunnel barrier. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(11): 7221-7227. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7221 [14] Tang Zhen-Kun, Wang Ling-Ling, Tang Li-Ming, You Kai-Ming, Zou Bing-Suo. Spin polarized transport of two-dimensional electron gas through step-magnetic barrier structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5899-5905. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5899 [15] Yan Sen-Lin. Studies on chaotic modulation performance and internal phase shifting key encoding in injection semiconductor lasers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(12): 6267-6274. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6267 [16] WANG HAO, GUO YONG, GU BING-LIN. TRANSPORT OF ELECTRONS IN DOUBLE-BARRIER MAGNETIC STRUCTURES UNDER A CONSTANT ELECTRIC FIELD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1999, 48(9): 1723-1732. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.1723 [17] WU CHENG-WEI, GUO XING-LIN. ELECTRICAL PROPERTY AND SHEAR STRENGTH OF A SINGLE CHAIN IN ELECTRORHEOLOGY UNDER DC ELECTRICAL FIELD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1997, 46(8): 1500-1507. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.1500 [18] FU XIN-YU, DONG JIA-QI, YING CHUN-TONG, LIU GUANG-JUN. PARTICLE TRANSPORT FROM TURBULENCE DRIVEN BY-PARALLEL VELOCITY SHEAR. Acta Physica Sinica, 1997, 46(3): 474-480. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.474 [19] WANG ZUO-WEI, LIN ZHI-FANG, TAO RUI-BAO. THE EFFECT OF ELECTRIC FIELD DIRECTION ON THE-SHEAR STRESS OF ER FLUIDS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1996, 45(4): 640-646. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.640 [20] TAO YUE-QUN, QIU LI-JIAN. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS FOR PELLET ABLATION (I). Acta Physica Sinica, 1988, 37(10): 1672-1677. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.1672
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4246
- PDF Downloads: 70
- Cited By: 0
