Theoretical study of polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of Be<sup>+</sup> ions and Li atoms

Wang Ting; Jiang Li; Wang Xia; Dong Chen-Zhong; Wu Zhong-Wen; Jiang Jun

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20201386

Abstract

The wave functions, energy levels, and oscillator strengths of Be⁺ ions and Li atoms are calculated by using a relativistic potential model, which is named the relativistic configuration interaction plus core polarization method (RCICP). The calculated energy levels in this work are in good agreement with experimental levels tabulated in NIST Atomic Spectra Database, and the difference appears in the sixth digit after the decimal point. The present oscillator strengths are in good agreement with the existing theoretical and experimental results. By means of these energy levels and oscillator strengths, the electric-dipole static polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of the ground states are determined. The contributions of different intermediate states to the hyperpolarizabilities of the ground state are further discussed. For Be⁺ ions, the present electric-dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability are in good agreement with the results calculated by Hartree-Fock plus core polarization method, the finite field method and relativistic many-body method. The largest contribution to the hyperpolarizability is the term of $\alpha _{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\beta _0}$. For Li atoms, the present electric-dipole polarizability is in good agreement with the available theoretical and experimental results. However, the present hyperpolarizability is different from the other theoretical results significantly. Moreover, the hyperpolarizabilities calculated by different theoretical methods are quite different. The biggest difference is more than one order of magnitude. In order to explain the reason for these differences, we analyze the contributions of different intermediate states to the hyperpolarizability in detail. It is found that the sum of the contributions of the 2s→np_j$\left( {n \geqslant 3} \right)$ and np_j→nd_j$\left( {n \geqslant 3} \right)$ to hyperpolarizability is approximately equal to that term of $\alpha _{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\beta _0}$. The total hyperpolarizability, which is the difference between the sum of the contributions of the 2s→np_j$\left( {n \geqslant 3} \right)$ and np_j→nd_j$\left( {n \geqslant 3} \right)$ to hyperpolarizability and $\alpha _{\text{0}}^{\text{1}}{\beta _0}$, is relatively small. Consequently, this difference magnifies the calculated error. If the uncertainties of the transition matrix elements are less than 0.1%, the uncertainty of hyperpolarizability is more than 100%. Therefore, the differences of hyperpolarizabilities for the ground state of Li atoms, calculated by various theoretical methods, are more than 100% or one order of magnitude.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Corresponding author: Jiang Jun, phyjiang@yeah.net

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0402300) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11774292, 11804280, 11864036)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Kassimi E B, Thakkar A J 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 2948 Google Scholar
[2]	Dür W, Briegel H J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 067901 Google Scholar
[3]	Childress L, Taylor J M, Sørensen A S, Lukin M D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 052330 Google Scholar
[4]	Jiang L, Taylor J M, Sørensen A S, Lukin M D 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 062323 Google Scholar
[5]	Gorshkov A V, Rey A M, Daley A J, Boyd M M, Ye J, Zoller P, Lukin M D 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 110503 Google Scholar
[6]	Wineland D J, Drullinger R E, Walls F L 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 1639 Google Scholar
[7]	Neuhauser W, Hohenstatt M, Toschek P E, Dehmelt H 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 233 Google Scholar
[8]	Flury J 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012051 Google Scholar
[9]	Bregolin F, Milani G, Pizzocaro M, Rauf B, Thoumany P, Levi F, Calonico D 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 841 012015 Google Scholar
[10]	Pihan-Le Bars H, Guerlin C, Bailey Q G, Bize S, Wolf P 2017 arXiv: 1701.06902[gr-qc]
[11]	Roberts B M, Blewitt G, Dailey C, Murphy M, Pospelov M, Rollings A, Sherman J, Williams W, Derevianko A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1195 Google Scholar
[12]	Bloom B J, Nicholson T L, Williams J R, Campbell S L, Bishof M, Zhang X, Zhang W, Bromley S L, Ye J 2014 Nature 506 71 Google Scholar
[13]	Chou C W, Hume D B, Koelemeij J C J, Wineland D J, Rosenband T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070802 Google Scholar
[14]	Brewer S M, Chen J S, Hankin A M, Clements E R, Chou C W, Wineland D J, Hume D B, Leibrandt D R 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 033201 Google Scholar
[15]	Hinkley N, Sherman J A, Phillips N B, Schioppo M, Lemke N D, Beloy K, Pizzocaro M, Oates C W, Ludlow A D 2013 Science 341 1215 Google Scholar
[16]	Brusch A, Le T R, Baillard X, Fouché M, Lemonde P 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 103003 Google Scholar
[17]	Barbe Z W, Lemke J E, Polt N D 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 103002 Google Scholar
[18]	Westergaard P G, Lodewyck J, Lorini L, Lecallier A, Burt E A, Zawada M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 210801 Google Scholar
[19]	Derevianko A, Katori H 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 331 Google Scholar
[20]	Katori H, Takamoto M, Pal'Chikov V G, Ovsiannikov V D 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 173005 Google Scholar
[21]	Porsev S G, Safronova M S, Safronova U I, Kozlov M G 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 063204 Google Scholar
[22]	Tang L Y, Zhang J Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F, Mitroy J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 042511 Google Scholar
[23]	Tang L Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 012524 Google Scholar
[24]	Tang L Y, Zhang J Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Mitroy J 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 042521 Google Scholar
[25]	Safronova U I, Safronova M S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 032502 Google Scholar
[26]	Fuentealba P, Reyes O 1993 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 2245 Google Scholar
[27]	Jiang J, Mitroy J, Cheng Y J, Bromley M W J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 062514 Google Scholar
[28]	Mitroy J, Safronova M S, Clark C W 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 202001 Google Scholar
[29]	Safronova M S, Safronova U I, Clark C W 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 042505 Google Scholar
[30]	Yin D, Zhang Y H, Li C B, Gao K L, Shi T Y 2016 Sci. China Phys. Mech. 59 690011 Google Scholar
[31]	Tang L Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 062712 Google Scholar
[32]	Stiehler J, Hinze J 1995 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 4055 Google Scholar
[33]	Pipin J, Bishop D M 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 2736 Google Scholar
[34]	Maroulis G, Thakkar A J 1989 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 22 2439 Google Scholar
[35]	Nicolaides C A, Themelis S I 1993 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 2217 Google Scholar
[36]	Kaneko S 1977 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 10 3347 Google Scholar
[37]	Mitroy J, Zhang J Y, Bromley M W J 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 032512 Google Scholar
[38]	Bhatia A K, Drachman R J 1997 Can. J. Phys. 75 11 Google Scholar
[39]	Johnson W R, Cheng K T 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 1375 Google Scholar
[40]	Bromley M W J, Mitroy J 2001 Phys. Rev. A 65 012505 Google Scholar
[41]	Grant I P, Quiney H M 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 022508 Google Scholar
[42]	Kramida A, Ralchenko Yu, Reader J NIST ASD Team https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2019-9-10]
[43]	Adelman S A, Szabo A 1973 J. Chem. Phys. 58 687 Google Scholar
[44]	Pipin J, Woźnicki W 1983 Chem. Phys. Lett. 95 392 Google Scholar
[45]	Patil S H, Tang K T 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 2298 Google Scholar
[46]	Wang Z W, Chung K T 1994 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 27 855 Google Scholar
[47]	Chen C, Wang Z W 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 4171 Google Scholar
[48]	Wansbeek L W, Sahoo B K, Timmermans R G E, Das B P, Mukherjee D 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 029901 Google Scholar
[49]	Johnson W R, Safronova U I, Derevianko A, Safronova M S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 022510 Google Scholar
[50]	Zhang J Y, Mitroy J, Bromley M W J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 810 Google Scholar
[51]	Derevianko A, Babb J F, Dalgarno A 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 052704 Google Scholar
[52]	Cohen S, Themelis S. I. 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 3705 Google Scholar
[53]	Molof R W, Schwartz H L, Miller T M, Bederson B 1974 Phys. Rev. A 10 1131 Google Scholar
[54]	Miffre A, Jacquet M, Büchner M, Trénec G, Vigué J 2006 Eur. Phys. J D 38 353 Google Scholar

Cited By

表 1 Be⁺离子和Li原子的截断参数${\rho _{l, j}}$(单位: a.u.)

Table 1. Cut-off parameters${\rho _{l, j}}$of Be⁺ ions and Li atoms (in a.u.).

State	j	ρ_{l, j}
State	j	Be⁺	Li
2s	1/2	0.9552	1.40880
2p	1/2	0.8789	1.28466
	3/2	0.8775	1.28396
3d	3/2	0.1287	2.324
	5/2	0.1284	2.330

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 Be⁺离子和Li原子基态和部分低激发态相对于原子实的能级, 实验值(Exp.)是来自于NIST的数据(单位: a.u.)

Table 2. Energy levels of the ground state and some low-lying states of Be⁺ ions and Li atoms relative to atomic core. Experimental values (Exp.) are from the NIST data (in a.u.).

State	j	Be⁺		Li
State	j	RCICP	Expt.^[42]	RCICP	Expt.^[42]
2s	1/2	–0.66924767	–0.66924755	–0.1981419	–0.1981419
2p	1/2	–0.52376962	–0.52376949	–0.1302358	–0.1302358
	3/2	–0.52373967	–0.52373953	–0.1302343	–0.1302343
3s	1/2	–0.26719384	–0.26723337	–0.0741684	–0.0741817
3p	1/2	–0.22954214	–0.22958234	–0.0572264	–0.0572354
	3/2	–0.22953331	–0.22957356	–0.0572260	–0.0572354
3d	3/2	–0.22247809	–0.22247805	–0.0556055	–0.0556057
	5/2	–0.22247565	–0.22247565	–0.0556051	–0.0556055
4s	1/2	–0.14313397	–0.14315285	–0.0386096	–0.0386151
4p	1/2	–0.12811380	–0.12813485	–0.0319693	–0.0319744
	3/2	–0.12811009	–0.12813115	–0.0319691	–0.0319744
4d	3/2	–0.12512357	–0.12512455	–0.0308153	–0.0312735
	5/2	–0.12512257	–0.12512345	–0.0308152	–0.0312734
5s	1/2	–0.08905659	–0.08906605	–0.0236202	–0.0236365
5p	1/2	–0.08159826	–0.08160960	–0.0203583	–0.0203739
	3/2	–0.08159637	–0.08160765	–0.0203583	–0.0203739
5d	3/2	–0.08006698	–0.08006725	–0.0124153	–0.0200122
	5/2	–0.08006648	–0.08006670	–0.0124152	–0.0200122

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 Be⁺离子基态和部分低激发态之间跃迁的振子强度, “Diff.”表示用RCICP方法计算的结果与NIST结果之差的百分比

Table 3. Oscillator strengths of transitions between the ground state and some low-lying states of Be⁺ ions. “Diff.” represents the difference in percentage form calculated by RCICP method and NIST results.

Transitions	RCICP	NIST^[42]	Theor.^[25]	Diff./%
2s_1/2→2p_1/2	0.16624	0.16596	0.1661	0.17
2s_1/2→2p_3/2	0.33258	0.33198	0.3322	0.18
2s_1/2→3p_1/2	0.02760	0.02768	0.0277	0.29
2s_1/2→3p_3/2	0.05517	0.05540	0.0553	0.42
2p_1/2→3s_1/2	0.06434	0.06438	0.0644	0.06
2p_3/2→3s_1/2	0.06436	0.06438	0.0644	0.03
2p_1/2→4s_1/2	0.01022	0.01039	0.0102	1.64
2p_3/2→4s_1/2	0.01022	0.01039	0.0102	1.64
2p_1/2→3d_3/2	0.6320	0.6320	0.6319	0.00
2p_3/2→3d_3/2	0.0632	0.0632	0.0632	0.00
2p_3/2→3d_5/2	0.5689	0.5689	0.5688	0.00
3s_1/2→3p_1/2	0.2768	0.2767	0.2767	0.04
3s_1/2→3p_3/2	0.5538	0.5535	0.5535	0.05
3p_1/2→3d_3/2	0.08069	0.08113	0.0811	0.54
3p_3/2→3d_3/2	0.08059	0.08103	0.081	0.54
3p_3/2→3d_5/2	0.07256	0.07294	0.073	0.52
3p_1/2→4s_1/2	0.1346	0.1347	0.1346	0.07
3p_3/2→4s_1/2	0.1346	0.1347	0.1346	0.07

DownLoad: CSV

表 4 Li原子基态和部分低激发态之间跃迁的振子强度, “Diff.”表示用RCICP方法计算的结果与NIST结果之间差别的百分比

Table 4. Oscillator strengths of transitions between the ground state and some low-lying states of Li atoms. “Diff.” represents the difference in percentage form calculated by RCICP method and NIST results.

Transitions	RCICP	NIST^[42]	Theor.^[29]	Diff./%
2s_1/2→2p_1/2	0.24915	0.24899	0.2490	0.06
2s_1/2→2p_3/2	0.49832	0.49797	0.4981	0.07
2s_1/2→3p_1/2	0.00157	0.00157	0.0016	0.00
2s_1/2→3p_3/2	0.00313	0.00314	0.0032	0.32
2p_1/2→3s_1/2	0.11058	0.11050	0.1106	0.07
2p_3/2→3s_1/2	0.11059	0.11050	0.1106	0.08
2p_1/2→4s_1/2	0.01285	0.01283	0.0128	0.16
2p_3/2→4s_1/2	0.01285	0.01283	0.0128	0.16
2p_1/2→3d_3/2	0.63876	0.63858	0.6386	0.03
2p_3/2→3d_3/2	0.06388	0.06386	0.0639	0.03
2p_3/2→3d_5/2	0.57489	0.57472	0.5747	0.03
3s_1/2→3p_1/2	0.40512	0.4051	0.405	0.00
3s_1/2→3p_3/2	0.81027	0.8100	0.810	0.03
3p_1/2→3d_3/2	0.07397	0.0733	0.0744	0.91
3p_3/2→3d_3/2	0.00740	0.00736	0.0074	0.54
3p_3/2→3d_5/2	0.06657	0.0663	0.0669	0.41
3p_1/2→4s_1/2	0.22325	0.2230	0.2232	0.11
3p_3/2→4s_1/2	0.22325	0.2230	0.2232	0.11
3d_3/2→4p_1/2	0.01453	0.01497	0.015	2.94
3d_3/2→4p_3/2	0.00290	0.00299	0.003	3.01
3d_5/2→4p_3/2	0.01743	0.01796	0.018	2.95

DownLoad: CSV

表 5 Be⁺离子基态的电偶极极化率$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}$和超极化率${\gamma _{\rm{0}}}$, “Diff.”表示用RCICP方法计算的γ₀与其它理论数据之间差别的百分比, 括号内的值表示不确定度

Table 5. Electric-dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of the ground state of Be⁺ ions. “Diff.” represents the difference of γ₀ in percentage form calculated by RCICP and other theoretical method. The values in parentheses indicate the uncertainties.

Method	$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}$/a.u.	γ₀/a.u.	Diff./%
RCICP	24.504(32)	–11529.971(84)
Coulomb approximation^[43]	24.77
Variation-perturbation Hylleraas CI^[44]	24.5
Hylleraas^[24]	24.489
Asymptotic correct wave function^[45]	24.91
Variation-perturbation FCCI^[46,47]	24.495
Hartree-Fock plus core polarization^[22]	24.493	–11511	0.16
Hylleraas^[22]	24.4966(1)	–11521.30(3)	0.08
Relativistic many-body calculation^[25]	24.483(4)	–11496(6)	0.29
The finite field method^[30]	24.5661	–11702.31	1.49

DownLoad: CSV

表 6 中间态对Be⁺离子基态超极化率的贡献, RCICP^C表示2s→2p_j, 2p_j→3d_j跃迁的约化矩阵元用NIST^[42]结果替换之后计算的结果, 括号内的值表示RCICP相对于RCICP^C的不确定度(单位: a.u.)

Table 6. Contributions to the hyperpolarizability of the ground state of Be⁺ ions. RCICP^C represents that the reduced matrix elements of the 2s→2p_j、2p_j→3d_j transitions are replaced by NIST^[42] results. The values in parentheses indicate the uncertainties of RCICP relative to RCICP^C (in a.u.).

Contr.	RCICP	RCICP^C	RMBT^[25]
$\tfrac{1}{18}$T (s, p_1/2, s, p_1/2)	34.34(2)	34.32	32.605(53)
$-\tfrac{1}{18}$T (s, p_1/2, s, p_3/2)	68.68(5)	68.63	68.886(92)
$-\tfrac{1}{18}$T (s, p_3/2, s, p_1/2)	68.68(5)	68.63	68.886(92)
$\tfrac{1}{18}$T (s, p_3/2, s, p_3/2)	137.35(10)	137.25	137.669(109)
$T({\rm{s, }}{{\rm{p}}_{j'}}, {\rm{ s}}, {\rm{ }}{{\rm{p}}_{j''}})$	308.04(12)	308.83	308.046(178)
$\tfrac{1}{18}$T (s, p_1/2, d_3/2, p_1/2)	202.75(16)	202.59	202.031(121)
$\tfrac{1}{18\sqrt{10} }$T (s, p_1/2, d_3/2, p_3/2)	40.55(4)	40.51	40.403(18)
$\tfrac{1}{18\sqrt{10} }$T (s, p_3/2, d_3/2, p_1/2)	40.55(4)	40.51	40.403(18)
$\tfrac{1}{180}$T (s, p_3/2, d_3/2, p_3/2)	8.11(1)	8.10	8.080(3)
$\tfrac{1}{30}$ T (s, p_3/2, d_5/2, p_3/2)	437.85(40)	437.45	438.434(148)
$T({\rm{s}}, {{\rm{p}}_{j'}}, {{\rm{d}}_j}, {{\rm{p}}_{j''}})$	729.79(43)	729.17	729.351(192)
$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}{\beta _0}$	1999.67(6.95)	1992.72	1995.743(382)
γ₀(2 s)	–11529(84)	–11456	–11496(6)

DownLoad: CSV

表 7 Li原子基态的电偶极极化率$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}$和超极化率${\gamma _{\rm{0}}}$, 括号内的值表示不确定度(单位: a.u.)

Table 7. Electric-dipole polarizability and hyperpolarizability of the ground state of Li atoms. The values in parentheses indicate the uncertainties (in a.u.).

Method	$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}$	γ₀
RCICP	164.05(8)	1920(3264)
The coupled cluster (all single, double and triple substitution)^[1]	164.19	2880
Finite-field quadratic configuration interaction^[1]	164.32	1020
Hylleraas^[31]	164.112(1)	3060(40)
The relativistic coupled-cluster method^[48]	164.23
Relativistic variation perturbation^[49]	164.084
Relativistic all-order methods^[29]	164.16(5)
Variation perturbation^[33]	164.10	3000
Semiempirical pseudopotentials^[26]	164.08	65000
Frozen core Hamiltonian with a semiempirical polarization potential^[50]	164.21
Finite-field fourth-order many-body perturbation theory^[34]	164.5	4300
Configuration interaction^[35]	164.9	37000
Relativistic ab initio methods^[51]	164.0(1)
The restricted Hartree-Fock^[32]	170.1	–55000
The Rydberg-Klein-Rees inversion method with the quantum defect theory^[52]	164.14	3390
Exp.^[53]	164(3)
Exp.^[54]	164.2(11)

DownLoad: CSV

表 8 中间态对Li原子基态超极化率的贡献, RCICP^C表示2s→2p_j, 2p_j→3d_j跃迁的约化矩阵元用NIST^[42]结果替换之后计算的结果, “Diff.”表示RCICP与RCICP^C之间差别的百分比, 括号内的值表示RCICP相对于RCICP^C的不确定度

Table 8. Contributions to the hyperpolarizability of the ground state of Li atoms. RCICP^C represents that the reduced matrix elements of 2s→2p_j, 2p_j→3d_j transitions are replaced by NIST^[42] results. “Diff.” represents the difference in percentage form between RCICP method and RCICP^C. The values in parentheses indicate the uncertainties of RCICP relative to RCICP^C.

Contr.	RCICP/a.u.	RCICP^C/a.u.	Diff. /%
$ \frac{1}{18} $T (s, p_1/2, s, p_1/2)	8314(2)	8312	0.03
$ -\frac{1}{18} $T (s, p_1/2, s, p_3/2)	16629(5)	16624	0.03
$ -\frac{1}{18} $T (s, p_3/2, s, p_1/2)	16629(5)	16624	0.03
$ \frac{1}{18} $T (s, p_3/2, s, p_3/2)	33259(11)	33248	0.03
$T({\rm{s}}, {{\rm{p}}_{j'}}, {\rm{s}}, {{\rm{p}}_{j''}})$	74833(13)	74809	0.02
$ \frac{1}{18} $T (s, p_1/2, d_3/2, p_1/2)	33812(13)	33799	0.04
$ \frac{1}{18\sqrt{10}} $T (s, p_1/2, d_3/2, p_3/2)	6762(3)	6759	0.04
$ \frac{1}{18\sqrt{10}} $T (s, p_3/2, d_3/2, p_1/2)	6762(3)	6759	0.04
$ \frac{1}{180} $T (s, p_3/2, d_3/2, p_3/2)	1352(0)	1352	0.00
$ \frac{1}{30} $ T (s, p_3/2, d_5/2, p_3/2)	73033(40)	72993	0.05
$T({\rm{s}}, {{\rm{p}}_{j'}}, {{\rm{d}}_j}, {{\rm{p}}_{j''}})$	121723(42)	121661	0.03
$\alpha _{\rm{0}}^{\rm{1}}{\beta _0}$	196396(268)	196128	0.14
γ₀(2 s)	1920(3264)	4109	170

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Kassimi E B, Thakkar A J 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 2948 Google Scholar
[2]	Dür W, Briegel H J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 067901 Google Scholar
[3]	Childress L, Taylor J M, Sørensen A S, Lukin M D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 052330 Google Scholar
[4]	Jiang L, Taylor J M, Sørensen A S, Lukin M D 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 062323 Google Scholar
[5]	Gorshkov A V, Rey A M, Daley A J, Boyd M M, Ye J, Zoller P, Lukin M D 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 110503 Google Scholar
[6]	Wineland D J, Drullinger R E, Walls F L 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 1639 Google Scholar
[7]	Neuhauser W, Hohenstatt M, Toschek P E, Dehmelt H 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 233 Google Scholar
[8]	Flury J 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012051 Google Scholar
[9]	Bregolin F, Milani G, Pizzocaro M, Rauf B, Thoumany P, Levi F, Calonico D 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 841 012015 Google Scholar
[10]	Pihan-Le Bars H, Guerlin C, Bailey Q G, Bize S, Wolf P 2017 arXiv: 1701.06902[gr-qc]
[11]	Roberts B M, Blewitt G, Dailey C, Murphy M, Pospelov M, Rollings A, Sherman J, Williams W, Derevianko A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 1195 Google Scholar
[12]	Bloom B J, Nicholson T L, Williams J R, Campbell S L, Bishof M, Zhang X, Zhang W, Bromley S L, Ye J 2014 Nature 506 71 Google Scholar
[13]	Chou C W, Hume D B, Koelemeij J C J, Wineland D J, Rosenband T 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 070802 Google Scholar
[14]	Brewer S M, Chen J S, Hankin A M, Clements E R, Chou C W, Wineland D J, Hume D B, Leibrandt D R 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 033201 Google Scholar
[15]	Hinkley N, Sherman J A, Phillips N B, Schioppo M, Lemke N D, Beloy K, Pizzocaro M, Oates C W, Ludlow A D 2013 Science 341 1215 Google Scholar
[16]	Brusch A, Le T R, Baillard X, Fouché M, Lemonde P 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 103003 Google Scholar
[17]	Barbe Z W, Lemke J E, Polt N D 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 103002 Google Scholar
[18]	Westergaard P G, Lodewyck J, Lorini L, Lecallier A, Burt E A, Zawada M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 210801 Google Scholar
[19]	Derevianko A, Katori H 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 331 Google Scholar
[20]	Katori H, Takamoto M, Pal'Chikov V G, Ovsiannikov V D 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 173005 Google Scholar
[21]	Porsev S G, Safronova M S, Safronova U I, Kozlov M G 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 063204 Google Scholar
[22]	Tang L Y, Zhang J Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F, Mitroy J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 042511 Google Scholar
[23]	Tang L Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 012524 Google Scholar
[24]	Tang L Y, Zhang J Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Mitroy J 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 042521 Google Scholar
[25]	Safronova U I, Safronova M S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 032502 Google Scholar
[26]	Fuentealba P, Reyes O 1993 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 2245 Google Scholar
[27]	Jiang J, Mitroy J, Cheng Y J, Bromley M W J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 062514 Google Scholar
[28]	Mitroy J, Safronova M S, Clark C W 2010 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43 202001 Google Scholar
[29]	Safronova M S, Safronova U I, Clark C W 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 042505 Google Scholar
[30]	Yin D, Zhang Y H, Li C B, Gao K L, Shi T Y 2016 Sci. China Phys. Mech. 59 690011 Google Scholar
[31]	Tang L Y, Yan Z C, Shi T Y, Babb J F 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 062712 Google Scholar
[32]	Stiehler J, Hinze J 1995 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28 4055 Google Scholar
[33]	Pipin J, Bishop D M 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 2736 Google Scholar
[34]	Maroulis G, Thakkar A J 1989 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 22 2439 Google Scholar
[35]	Nicolaides C A, Themelis S I 1993 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 26 2217 Google Scholar
[36]	Kaneko S 1977 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 10 3347 Google Scholar
[37]	Mitroy J, Zhang J Y, Bromley M W J 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 032512 Google Scholar
[38]	Bhatia A K, Drachman R J 1997 Can. J. Phys. 75 11 Google Scholar
[39]	Johnson W R, Cheng K T 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 1375 Google Scholar
[40]	Bromley M W J, Mitroy J 2001 Phys. Rev. A 65 012505 Google Scholar
[41]	Grant I P, Quiney H M 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 022508 Google Scholar
[42]	Kramida A, Ralchenko Yu, Reader J NIST ASD Team https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2019-9-10]
[43]	Adelman S A, Szabo A 1973 J. Chem. Phys. 58 687 Google Scholar
[44]	Pipin J, Woźnicki W 1983 Chem. Phys. Lett. 95 392 Google Scholar
[45]	Patil S H, Tang K T 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 106 2298 Google Scholar
[46]	Wang Z W, Chung K T 1994 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 27 855 Google Scholar
[47]	Chen C, Wang Z W 2004 J. Chem. Phys. 121 4171 Google Scholar
[48]	Wansbeek L W, Sahoo B K, Timmermans R G E, Das B P, Mukherjee D 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 029901 Google Scholar
[49]	Johnson W R, Safronova U I, Derevianko A, Safronova M S 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 022510 Google Scholar
[50]	Zhang J Y, Mitroy J, Bromley M W J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 810 Google Scholar
[51]	Derevianko A, Babb J F, Dalgarno A 2001 Phys. Rev. A 63 052704 Google Scholar
[52]	Cohen S, Themelis S. I. 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 3705 Google Scholar
[53]	Molof R W, Schwartz H L, Miller T M, Bederson B 1974 Phys. Rev. A 10 1131 Google Scholar
[54]	Miffre A, Jacquet M, Büchner M, Trénec G, Vigué J 2006 Eur. Phys. J D 38 353 Google Scholar

[1]	Yang Wei, Ding Shi-Yuan, Sun Bao-Yuan. Relativistic Hartree-Fock model of nuclear single-particle resonances based on real stabilization method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(6): 062102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231632
[2]	Chen Chi-Ting, Wu Lei, Wang Xia, Wang Ting, Liu Yan-Jun, Jiang Jun, Dong Chen-Zhong. Theoretical study of static dipole polarizabilities and hyperpolarizability of B²⁺ and B⁺ ions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 143101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221990
[3]	Yu Geng-Hua, Yan Hui, Gao Dang-Li, Zhao Peng-Yi, Liu Hong, Zhu Xiao-Ling, Yang Wei. Calculationof isotope shift of Mg+ ion by using the relativistic multi-configuration interaction method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(1): 013101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171817
[4]	Yu Xue-Cai, Wang Ping-He, Zhang Li-Xun. Atom movement in momentum dependent light dipole lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(14): 144202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.144202
[5]	You Yang-Ming, Wang Bing-Zhang, Wang Ji-You. Optical model potential of antiproton atoms with nuclear polarization correction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 202401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.202401
[6]	Tian Mi, Zhang Qiu-Ju, Bai Yi-Ling, Cui Chun-Hong. Scattering of electrons in linearly polarized high-intensity laser standing waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 203401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.203401
[7]	Zhu Jing, Lü Chang-Gui, Hong Xu-Sheng, Cui Yi-Ping. Theoretical study on solvent effect of the molecular first hyperpolarizability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2850-2854. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2850
[8]	Wang Li-Guang, Zhang Hong-Yu, Wang Chang, Terence K. S. W.. Electronic conductance of zigzag single wall carbon nanotube with an implanted Li atom. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(1): 536-540. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.536
[9]	Wang Lei, Hu Hui-Fang, Wei Jian-Wei, Zeng Hui, Yu Ying-Ying, Wang Zhi-Yong, Zhang Li-Juan. Theoretical study on the first hyperpolarizabilities of stilbene derivatives. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2987-2993. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2987
[10]	Lu Zhen-Ping, Han Kui, Li Hai-Peng, Zhang Wen-Tao, Huang Zhi-Min, Shen Xiao-Peng, Zhang Zhao-Hui, Bai Lei. Theoretical study of molecular vibrational hyperpolarizability of 4-N-methylstilbazonium salt derivatives. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(10): 5843-5848. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5843
[11]	Li Hai-Peng, Han Kui, Lu Zhen-Ping, Shen Xiao-Peng, Huang Zhi-Min, Zhang Wen-Tao, Bai Lei. Theoretical investigation on dispersion effect and two-photon resonance enhancement of molecular first hyperpolarizability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(4): 1827-1831. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1827
[12]	Chen Hong, Mei Hua, Shen Peng-Nian, Jiang Huan-Qing. Heavy quarkonium mass spectra in a relativistic quark model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(3): 1136-1141. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1136
[13]	Liu Yu-Xiao, Zhao Zhen-Hua, Wang Yong-Qiang, Chen Yu-Hong. Variational calculations and relativistic corrections to the nonrelativistic ground energies of the helium atom and the helium-like ions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(6): 2620-2624. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2620
[14]	Tang Chang-Jian, Gong Yu-Bin, Yang Yu-Zhi. Dielectric tensor of 2D relativistic motional plasma. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(4): 1145-1149. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1145
[15]	Zheng Yang-Dong, Li Jun-Qing, Li Chun-Fei. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(6): 1279-1285. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1279
[16]	ZENG GUI-HUA, ZHU HONG-WEN, XU ZHI-ZHAN. RELATIVISTIC EVEN-ORDER HARMONICS GENERATED IN UNDERDENSE PLASMA. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(10): 1946-1949. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1946
[17]	LI GAO-XIANG, PENG JIN-SHENG. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(10): 1670-1678. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1670
[18]	QU YI-ZHI, GONG XIAO-MIN, LI JIA-MING. RELATIVISTIC EFFECT IN INELASTIC COLLISION OF ELECTRON WITH ATOM OR ION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1995, 44(11): 1719-1726. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1719
[19]	HE XING-HONG, LI BAI-WEN, ZHANG CHENG-XIU. POLARIZABILITIES OF HIGH RYDBERG ALKALI ATOMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(10): 1717-1722. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1717
[20]	. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1965, 21(11): 1927-1932. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1927

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 4 - 2021-02-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 11177
PDF Downloads: 179
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

Theoretical study of polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of Be⁺ ions and Li atoms

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Jiang Jun, phyjiang@yeah.net

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板

Theoretical study of polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of Be+ ions and Li atoms

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Jiang Jun, phyjiang@yeah.net

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Publishing process

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Theoretical study of polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities of Be⁺ ions and Li atoms