-
The geometric structure, electronic structure, magnetic properties and absorption spectrum of graphene-like ZnO (g-ZnO) monolayer supercell with defects are systemically studied by the first-principles calculation based on density functional theory in this work. The defect supercell model includes zinc atom vacancy (VZn_g-ZnO), oxygen atom vacancy (VO_g-ZnO), nitrogen atom substituted for oxygen atom (NO_g-ZnO) and nitrogen adsorbed on the g-ZnO monolayer (N@g-ZnO). The results indicate that the geometric deformation induced by N-doping in NO_g-ZnO and N@g-ZnO structure is negligible, while that of supercell with vacancy is relatively large. The O atoms neighboring a Zn vacancy center in VZn_g-ZnO model move away from each other as a result of symmetry breaking. As a contrast, three N atoms around VO center move into VZn_g-ZnO supercell. The pristine g-ZnO is non-magnetic. But the magnetic moment of VZn_g-ZnO is 2.00 μB in total as a result of symmetry breaking. The partial magnetic moment mainly results from the p-orbitals of the three neighboring O atoms. VO_g-ZnO has no magnetic moment, but possesses the electronic structure with identical spin-up and spin-down. The total magnetic moment of the N-doped NO_g-ZnO is 1.00 μB, and the total magnetic moment of N@g-ZnO is 3.00 μB. Their local magnetic moments are mainly contributed by the p-orbitals of N atom. The density of states and the spin density are given to analyze the magnetic properties. Based on the supercell local symmetry and molecular orbital theory, the origin of magnetic moment is well explained. The magnetic VZn_g-ZnO, NO_g-ZnO and N@g-ZnO supercell are found to have a D3h, D3h and C3v local symmetry, respectively, which well explains that their total magnetic moments are 2.00 μB, 1.00 μB and 3.00 μB, respectively. The optical absorption characteristics are also discussed. An enhancement of light absorption can be observed for the defective supercells, due to the introduction of defect states into the band gap. The optical transition between gap state and valance band leads to the below band gap absorption. These results are of insightful guidance for understanding properties of graphene-like ZnO monolayer as well as g-ZnO with vacancy and N dopant, and can be theoretically adopted for investigating the nano-electronic devices and catalytic applications based on g-ZnO monolayer.
-
Keywords:
- two-dimensional material /
- ZnO /
- defect /
- molecular orbital theory /
- first-principles calculation
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Y, Tan Y, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201Google Scholar
[3] Kerelsky A, Mcgilly L J, Kennes D M, Xian L, Yankowitz M, Chen S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J, Dean C, Rubio A, Pasupathy A N 2019 Nature 572 95Google Scholar
[4] Ta H, Zhao L, Pohl D, Pang J, Trzebicka B, Rellinghaus B, Pribat D, Gemming T, Liu Z, Bachmatiuk A, Rümmeli M 2016 Crystals 6 100Google Scholar
[5] Weng Q, Wang X, Wang X, Bando Y, Golberg D 2016 Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 3989Google Scholar
[6] Zhang Z, Geng Z, Cai D, Pan T, Chen Y, Dong L, Zhou T 2015 Physica E 65 24Google Scholar
[7] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar
[8] Gao Z, Zhou Z, Tománek D 2019 ACS Nano 13 5103Google Scholar
[9] Ye M, Seo H, Galli G 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 44Google Scholar
[10] Zhu C, Gao D, Ding J W, Chao D, Wang J 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 4332Google Scholar
[11] Liu Y, Huang Y, Duan X 2019 Nature 567 323Google Scholar
[12] Claeyssens F, Freeman C L, Allan N L, Sun Y, Ashfold M N R, Harding J H 2005 J. Mater. Chem. 15 139Google Scholar
[13] Tusche C, Meyerheim H L, Kirschner J 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 26102Google Scholar
[14] Topsakal M, Cahangirov S, Bekaroglu E, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 235119Google Scholar
[15] Zheng F B, Zhang C W, Wang P J, Luan H X 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 44329Google Scholar
[16] Peng Q, Liang C, Ji W, De S 2013 Comp. Mater. Sci. 68 320Google Scholar
[17] Guo H, Zhao Y, Lu N, Kan E, Zeng X C, Wu X, Yang J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 11336Google Scholar
[18] Chen J L, Devi N, Li N, Fu D J, Ke X W 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 086102Google Scholar
[19] Tan J T, Zhang S F, Qian M C, Luo H J, Wu F, Long X M, Fang L, Wei D P, Hu B S 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 114401Google Scholar
[20] Zheng S W, Fan G H, He M, Zhang T 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 066301Google Scholar
[21] 侯清玉, 曲灵丰, 赵春旺 2016 65 057401Google Scholar
Hou Q Y, Qu L F, Zhao C W 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 057401Google Scholar
[22] 侯清玉, 李勇, 赵春旺 2017 66 067202Google Scholar
Hou Q Y, Li Y, Zhao C 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 067202Google Scholar
[23] 张梅玲, 陈玉红, 张材荣, 李公平 2019 68 087101Google Scholar
Zhang M L, Chen Y H, Zhang C R, Li G P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 087101Google Scholar
[24] 张丽丽, 夏桐, 刘桂安, 雷博程, 赵旭才, 王少霞, 黄以能 2019 68 017401Google Scholar
Zhang L L, Xia T, Liu G A, Lei B C, Zhao X C, Wang S X, Huang Y N 2019 Acta P hys. Sin. 68 017401Google Scholar
[25] Sun M, Ren Q, Zhao Y, Chou J, Yu J, Tang W 2017 Carbon 120 265Google Scholar
[26] 张召富, 周铁戈, 左旭 2013 62 083102Google Scholar
Zhang Z F, Zhou T G, Zuo X 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 083102Google Scholar
[27] 张召富, 耿朝晖, 王鹏, 胡耀乔, 郑宇斐, 周铁戈 2013 62 246301Google Scholar
Zhang Z F, Geng Z H, Wang P, Hu Y Q, Zheng Y F, Zhou T G 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 246301Google Scholar
[28] Zhang Z F, Zhou T G, Zhao H Y, Wei X L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 016801Google Scholar
[29] Hohenberg P, Kohn W 1964 Phys. Rev. 136 864Google Scholar
[30] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[32] Heyd J, Scuseria G E, Ernzerhof M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 8207Google Scholar
[33] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[34] Wang V, Xu N, Liu J, Tang G, Geng W 2019 arXiv: 1908.08269 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
[35] Cui J, Liang S, Sun S, Zheng X, Zhang J 2018 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 175001Google Scholar
[36] Wang S, Ren C, Tian H, Yu J, Sun M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 13394Google Scholar
[37] Niu X, Li Y, Shu H, Yao X, Wang J 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 3648Google Scholar
[38] Liu Y, Liu H, Zhou H, Li T, Zhang L 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 466 133Google Scholar
[39] Tu Z C 2010 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 7 1182
-
图 2 空位及掺杂超胞体系的几何结构示意图 (a) VZn_g-ZnO; (b) VO_g-ZnO; (c) NO_g-ZnO; (d) N原子吸附在六元环中心上方; (e) N原子吸附在Zn原子上方; (f) N原子吸附在O原子上方
Figure 2. Atomic structures of the g-ZnO supercells: (a) Ideal g-ZnO; (b) VO_g-ZnO; (c) NO_g-ZnO; (d) N atom at hollow site; (e) N atom on top of Zn atom; (f) N atom on top of O atom.
图 5 分子轨道 (a) VZn_g-ZnO体系, O能级劈裂及电子填充示意图; (b) NO_g-ZnO体系, p轨道分裂及电子填充示意图; (c) N@g-ZnO体系, p轨道分裂及电子填充示意图
Figure 5. Molecular orbital diagrams: (a) VZn_g-ZnO supercell, O energy level splitting and electron filling; (b) NO_g-ZnO supercell, p-orbital splitting and electron filling; (c) N@g-ZnO supercell, p-orbital splitting and electron filling.
表 1 N掺杂g-ZnO单层的结构参数和结合能
Table 1. Structure parameters and binding energy of N-doped g-ZnO monolayer.
超胞模型 hN/Å hZn/Å hO/Å dZn_N/Å dO_N/Å Eb/eV NO_g-ZnO 0.07 0.005 0.003 1.92 3.31 –4.12 N@g-ZnO 2.12 0.003 –0.104 2.84 2.93 –0.25 表 2 N掺杂g-ZnO单层的磁矩
Table 2. Magnetic moment of N-doped g-ZnO monolayer.
超胞模型 Mtot/µB MN/µB MZn/µB MO/µB VO_g-ZnO 0 — 0 0 VZn_g-ZnO 2.00 — 0.02 0.45 NO_g-ZnO 1.00 0.59 0.01 0 N@g-ZnO 3.00 1.90 0 0.05 -
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Zhang Y, Tan Y, Stormer H L, Kim P 2005 Nature 438 201Google Scholar
[3] Kerelsky A, Mcgilly L J, Kennes D M, Xian L, Yankowitz M, Chen S, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Hone J, Dean C, Rubio A, Pasupathy A N 2019 Nature 572 95Google Scholar
[4] Ta H, Zhao L, Pohl D, Pang J, Trzebicka B, Rellinghaus B, Pribat D, Gemming T, Liu Z, Bachmatiuk A, Rümmeli M 2016 Crystals 6 100Google Scholar
[5] Weng Q, Wang X, Wang X, Bando Y, Golberg D 2016 Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 3989Google Scholar
[6] Zhang Z, Geng Z, Cai D, Pan T, Chen Y, Dong L, Zhou T 2015 Physica E 65 24Google Scholar
[7] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar
[8] Gao Z, Zhou Z, Tománek D 2019 ACS Nano 13 5103Google Scholar
[9] Ye M, Seo H, Galli G 2019 npj Comput. Mater. 5 44Google Scholar
[10] Zhu C, Gao D, Ding J W, Chao D, Wang J 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 4332Google Scholar
[11] Liu Y, Huang Y, Duan X 2019 Nature 567 323Google Scholar
[12] Claeyssens F, Freeman C L, Allan N L, Sun Y, Ashfold M N R, Harding J H 2005 J. Mater. Chem. 15 139Google Scholar
[13] Tusche C, Meyerheim H L, Kirschner J 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 26102Google Scholar
[14] Topsakal M, Cahangirov S, Bekaroglu E, Ciraci S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 235119Google Scholar
[15] Zheng F B, Zhang C W, Wang P J, Luan H X 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 111 44329Google Scholar
[16] Peng Q, Liang C, Ji W, De S 2013 Comp. Mater. Sci. 68 320Google Scholar
[17] Guo H, Zhao Y, Lu N, Kan E, Zeng X C, Wu X, Yang J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 11336Google Scholar
[18] Chen J L, Devi N, Li N, Fu D J, Ke X W 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 086102Google Scholar
[19] Tan J T, Zhang S F, Qian M C, Luo H J, Wu F, Long X M, Fang L, Wei D P, Hu B S 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 114401Google Scholar
[20] Zheng S W, Fan G H, He M, Zhang T 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 066301Google Scholar
[21] 侯清玉, 曲灵丰, 赵春旺 2016 65 057401Google Scholar
Hou Q Y, Qu L F, Zhao C W 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 057401Google Scholar
[22] 侯清玉, 李勇, 赵春旺 2017 66 067202Google Scholar
Hou Q Y, Li Y, Zhao C 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 067202Google Scholar
[23] 张梅玲, 陈玉红, 张材荣, 李公平 2019 68 087101Google Scholar
Zhang M L, Chen Y H, Zhang C R, Li G P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 087101Google Scholar
[24] 张丽丽, 夏桐, 刘桂安, 雷博程, 赵旭才, 王少霞, 黄以能 2019 68 017401Google Scholar
Zhang L L, Xia T, Liu G A, Lei B C, Zhao X C, Wang S X, Huang Y N 2019 Acta P hys. Sin. 68 017401Google Scholar
[25] Sun M, Ren Q, Zhao Y, Chou J, Yu J, Tang W 2017 Carbon 120 265Google Scholar
[26] 张召富, 周铁戈, 左旭 2013 62 083102Google Scholar
Zhang Z F, Zhou T G, Zuo X 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 083102Google Scholar
[27] 张召富, 耿朝晖, 王鹏, 胡耀乔, 郑宇斐, 周铁戈 2013 62 246301Google Scholar
Zhang Z F, Geng Z H, Wang P, Hu Y Q, Zheng Y F, Zhou T G 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 246301Google Scholar
[28] Zhang Z F, Zhou T G, Zhao H Y, Wei X L 2014 Chin. Phys. B 23 016801Google Scholar
[29] Hohenberg P, Kohn W 1964 Phys. Rev. 136 864Google Scholar
[30] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[32] Heyd J, Scuseria G E, Ernzerhof M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 8207Google Scholar
[33] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[34] Wang V, Xu N, Liu J, Tang G, Geng W 2019 arXiv: 1908.08269 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
[35] Cui J, Liang S, Sun S, Zheng X, Zhang J 2018 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30 175001Google Scholar
[36] Wang S, Ren C, Tian H, Yu J, Sun M 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 13394Google Scholar
[37] Niu X, Li Y, Shu H, Yao X, Wang J 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 3648Google Scholar
[38] Liu Y, Liu H, Zhou H, Li T, Zhang L 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 466 133Google Scholar
[39] Tu Z C 2010 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 7 1182
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 12983
- PDF Downloads: 364
- Cited By: 0