Low frequency band gaps of Helmholtz resonator coupled with membrane

Chen Xin; Yao Hong; Zhao Jing-Bo; Zhang Shuai; He Zi-Hou; Jiang Juan-Na

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190673

Abstract

In this paper, a phononic crystal is designed using a Helmholtz resonator with a membrane wall, in which the coupled vibration of air and membrane is utilized. The structure of the Helmholtz resonator is a two-dimensional structure. On the basis of the square Helmholtz resonator, a " W”-type outlet is used as a cavity outlet to increase the air quality involved in resonance, and the cavity wall is replaced with a membrane with distribution mass to increase the number of resonance units. The finite element method is used to calculate the band gaps and transmission loss of sound below 1700 Hz. The results show that the starting frequency of the first band gap of the structure is further reduced. At the same time, it is lower than the starting frequency of ordinary Helmholtz structure and the natural frequency of membrane under the same conditions. Then, a new peak of transmission loss is obtained, and its value is greater than the original structure’s. And although the width of the first band gap is reduced, some new band gaps appear in the low-frequency range, so that the total band gap width is improved. By analyzing the vibration mode of the membrane and sound pressure distribution, it is found that the sum of the sound pressures of the outer cavity is zero at the starting frequencies of the band gaps, and the sound pressure of the inner and outer cavity are respectively positive and negative at the cut-off frequency. With the increase of frequency, the vibration mode of the membrane gradually turns from low-order to high-order, but no anti-symmetric-type mode participation is found at the starting and cut-off frequency. The components of the structure can be made equivalent to corresponding ones, respectively, i.e. air in the outlet is equivalent to uniform flexible rod, and the air in the inner and outer cavity are equivalent to a spring. So that the structure can be equivalent to a series system consisting of a rod, a spring and a membrane at starting frequency of the band gap, and a loop system consisting of a rod, two springs and a membrane at cut-off frequency. Thus, by the transfer matrix method and the Rayleigh-Ritz method considering the influence of tension and elastic modulus, it is possible to calculate the range of band gap which is extremely close to the result from the finite element method. Through the analysis of the formulas, it can be found that the new band gap is caused by the new vibration mode produced by the membrane or the air in the cavity outlet, and the lower starting frequency of the first band gap is due to the reduction of the equivalent extent of the system by the membrane. By adjusting the relevant parameters of the membrane and the cavity outlet respectively, it can be found that the band gaps of the structure correspond to the modes of different orders of the air in the cavity outlet and the membrane. In other words, the change of the natural frequency of a certain mode of air in the outlet or membrane only has a greater influence on the corresponding band gap but has less influence on other band gaps, also, the trends of change are the same, and the change values are very close to each other. But, changing the volume of the inner cavity and the outer cavity has a great influence on all the band gaps. Therefore, it is possible to adjust some band gaps through this method.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Department of Basic Sciences, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710051, China

Corresponding author: Zhao Jing-Bo, chjzjb@163.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11504429)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Kushwaha M S, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2022 Google Scholar
[2]	王莎, 林书玉 2019 68 024303 Google Scholar Wang S, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 024303 Google Scholar
[3]	张振方, 郁殿龙, 刘江伟, 温激鸿 2018 67 074301 Google Scholar Zhang Z F, Yu D L, Liu J W, Wen J H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 074301 Google Scholar
[4]	廖涛, 孙小伟, 宋婷, 田俊红, 康太凤, 孙伟彬 2018 67 214208 Google Scholar Liao T, Sun X W, Song T, Tian J H, Kang T F, Sun W B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 214208 Google Scholar
[5]	Li S B, Dou Y H, Chen T N, Wan Z G, Guan Z R 2018 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 32 1850221
[6]	Korozlu N, Kaya O A, Cicek A, Ulug B 2018 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143 756 Google Scholar
[7]	Quan L, Ra Di Y, Sounas D L, Alù A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 254301 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhao L X, Zhou S X 2019 Sensors-Basel 19 788 Google Scholar
[9]	Yuan M, Cao Z, Luo J, Pang Z 2018 AIP Adv. 8 85012 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang Y, Zhu X, Zhang T S, Bano S, Pan H Y, Qi L F, Zhang Z T, Yuan Y P 2018 Appl. Energ. 230 52 Google Scholar
[11]	Quan L, Qian F, Liu X Z, Gong X F, Johnson P A 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 104105 Google Scholar
[12]	Quan L, Zhong X, Liu X, Gong X, Johnson P A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3188 Google Scholar
[13]	Hu X, Chan C T, Zi J 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 55601 Google Scholar
[14]	Chalmers L, Elford D P, Kusmartsev F V, Swallowe G M 2009 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23 4234 Google Scholar
[15]	Guan D, Wu J H, Jing L, Gao N, Hou M 2015 Noise Control Eng. J. 63 20 Google Scholar
[16]	Jiang J, Yao H, Du J, Zhao J 2016 AIP Adv. 6 115024 Google Scholar
[17]	姜久龙, 姚宏, 杜军, 赵静波, 邓涛 2017 66 064301 Google Scholar Jiang J L, Yao H, Du J, Zhao J B, Deng T 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 064301 Google Scholar
[18]	刘敏, 侯志林, 傅秀军 2012 61 104302 Google Scholar Liu M, Hou Z L, Fu X J 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 104302 Google Scholar
[19]	包凯, 陈天宁, 王小鹏, 王放, 张振华 2016 西安交通大学学报 50 124 Google Scholar Bao K, Chen T N, Wang X P, Wang F, Zhang Z H 2016 J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 50 124 Google Scholar
[20]	Liu C R, Wu J H, Chen X, Ma F Y 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 105302 Google Scholar
[21]	Ang L Y L, Koh Y K, Lee H P 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 41903 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang X, Zhao H, Luo X, Huang Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 41905 Google Scholar
[23]	Langfeldt F, Gleine W, von Estorff O 2015 J. Sound Vib. 349 315 Google Scholar
[24]	周榕, 吴卫国, 闻轶凡 2017 声学技术 36 297 Zhou R, Wu W G, Wen Y F 2017 Technical Acoustics 36 297
[25]	Abbad A, Rabenorosoa K, Ouisse M, Atalla N, Park G 2017 Proc. SPIE 10164 101640P
[26]	Langfeldt F, von Estorff O 2016 Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings 253 3413
[27]	Elayouch A, Addouche M, Herth E, Khelif A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 83504 Google Scholar
[28]	Liu C R, Wu J H, Lu K, Zhao Z T, Huang Z 2019 Appl. Acoust. 148 1 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhu X, Chen Z, Jiao Y, Wang Y 2018 J.Vibr. Acoust. 140 31014 Google Scholar
[30]	陈鑫, 姚宏, 赵静波, 张帅, 贺子厚, 蒋娟娜 2019 68 084302 Google Scholar Chen X, Yao H, Zhao J B, Zhang S, He Z H, Jiang J N 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 084302 Google Scholar
[31]	芮筱亭, 贠来峰, 陆毓琪, 何斌, 王国平 2008 多体系统的传递矩阵法及其应用 (北京: 科学出版社) 第425页 Rui X T, Yuan L F, Lu Y Q, He B, Wang G P 2008 Transfer Matrix Method of Multibody System and Its Applications (Beijing: Science Press) p425 (in Chinese)
[32]	倪振华 1989 振动力学 (西安: 西安交通大学出版社) 第410页 Nie Z H 1989 Vibration Mechanics (Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press) p410 (in Chinese)

Cited By

图 1 带薄膜壁的Helmholtz结构横截面

Figure 1. Cross section of Helmholtz resonator structure with a membrane wall.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 带薄膜壁的Helmholtz结构　(a) 带隙图; (b) 隔声曲线

Figure 2. Band diagram (a) and transmission spectrum (b) of the Helmholtz resonator structure with a membrane wall.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 普通Helmholtz结构的(a)带隙图和(b)隔声曲线

Figure 3. Band diagram (a) and transmission spectrum (b) of the ordinary Helmholtz resonator structure.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 (a) 模态A (88.40 Hz)、(b) 模态B (119.06 Hz)、(c) 模态C (302.09 Hz)、(d) 模态D (533.03 Hz)、(e) 模态E (772.31 Hz)、(f) 模态F (891.44 Hz) 的薄膜振型和声场压力图

Figure 4. Vibration mode of the membrane and sound pressure distribution diagrams of point A (88.40 Hz) (a), B (119.06 Hz) (b), C (302.09 Hz) (c), D (533.03 Hz) (d), E (772.31 Hz) (e), and F (891.44 Hz) (f).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 (a) 带隙下限系统示意图; (b) 带隙上限系统示意图

Figure 5. (a) System corresponding to starting frequency of band gaps; (b) system corresponding to cut-off frequency of band gaps.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 l₁ = 295 mm时(a) 第三带隙下限和(b) 第三带隙上限的声场压力图

Figure 6. Sound pressure distribution diagrams at starting frequency (a) and cutoff frequency (b) of the 3th band gap when l₁ = 295 mm.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 2 薄膜附加金属片长度l _s对薄膜固有频率的影响

Table 2. Effect of the parameter l _s on natural frequency of membrane.

l _s/10^–3 m	4	6	8	10	12	14
1阶固有频率	252.4	237.9	226.8	218.2	211.6	206.6
2阶固有频率	751.3	782.8	794.0	814.8	843.4	879.1

DownLoad: CSV

表 1 薄膜附加金属片长度l _s对低频带隙的影响

Table 1. Effect of the parameter l _s on low-frequency band gaps.

l_s/10^–3 m	第一带隙下限		第一带隙上限		第二带隙下限		第二带隙上限		第三带隙下限		第三带隙上限
l_s/10^–3 m	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%
4	89.2	3.7	121.4	4.4	314.2	2.8	557.7	0.6	790.7	2.2	900.3	1.6
4	92.5	3.7	126.7	4.4	323.0	2.8	561.2	0.6	808.3	2.2	914.7	1.6
6	88.9	3.6	120.1	4.2	297.7	1.8	526.8	–0.8	789.1	0.4	905.2	0.8
6	92.2	3.6	125.1	4.2	303.1	1.8	522.8	–0.8	792.4	0.4	912.2	0.8
8	88.7	3.5	118.9	3.9	285.1	0.9	508.3	–2.1	795.6	–1.1	916.1	–0.5
8	91.9	3.5	123.5	3.9	287.6	0.9	497.5	–2.1	786.8	–1.1	912.0	–0.5
10	88.6	3.4	117.9	3.5	275.6	–0.1	497.9	–3.5	815.9	–3.7	932.5	–2.3
10	91.6	3.4	122.0	3.5	275.4	–0.1	480.5	–3.5	786.0	–3.7	910.8	–2.3
12	88.5	3.1	117.2	3.0	268.4	–1.0	492.6	–4.8	843.8	–6.9	953.9	–5.2
12	91.3	3.1	120.7	3.0	265.6	–1.0	469.1	–4.8	785.3	–6.9	904.4	–5.2
14	88.5	2.8	116.7	2.3	262.9	–2.0	490.5	–5.9	878.5	–11	966.3	–8.2
14	91.0	2.8	119.4	2.3	257.6	–2.0	461.5	–5.9	779.9	–11	887.3	–8.2

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 薄膜张力T对低频带隙的影响

Table 3. Effect of the parameter T on low-frequency band gaps.

T/10⁶N·m^–1	第一带隙下限		第一带隙上限		第二带隙下限		第二带隙上限		第三带隙下限		第三带隙上限
T/10⁶N·m^–1	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%
0.5	74.3	3.4	89.3	2.8	259.2	0.7	440.3	–1.2	574.1	0.1	770.1	0.5
0.5	76.8	3.4	91.8	2.8	261.0	0.7	434.9	–1.2	574.4	0.1	774.3	0.5
1.5	96.3	3.4	143.1	4.6	345.5	3.2	589.6	0.2	952.1	2.2	1035.1	1.7
1.5	99.6	3.4	149.7	4.6	356.7	3.2	591.0	0.2	973.0	2.2	1053.1	1.7
2.5	103.3	2.9	174.6	4.6	415.0	4.2	648.0	0.7	1217.4	2.8	1274.1	2.3
2.5	106.4	2.9	182.7	4.6	432.6	4.2	652.4	0.7	1251.0	2.8	1303.2	2.3
3.5	106.8	2.7	196.4	4.4	474.9	4.8	691.4	1.1	1434.1	3.0	1478.6	2.5
3.5	109.6	2.7	205.0	4.4	497.6	4.8	698.8	1.1	1477.6	3.0	1516.1	2.5
4.5	108.8	2.5	212.5	4.1	528.2	5.1	729.6	1.4	1621.6	3.2	1642.5	3.3
4.5	111.5	2.5	221.3	4.1	555.2	5.1	740.1	1.4	1673.4	3.2	1696.5	3.3
10	113.0	2.1	257.8	3.0	757.3	5.9	907.9	2.7	1645.9	5.8	1741.8	3.1
10	115.3	2.1	265.6	3.0	801.7	5.9	932.8	2.7	1740.6	5.8	1796.2	3.1
100	116.2	1.8	311.0	1.2	1654.1	5.2	1737.3	3.1	2270.8	9.0	2375.3	6.1
100	118.3	1.8	314.9	1.2	1740.4	5.2	1791.6	3.1	2475.7	9.0	2520.3	6.1

DownLoad: CSV

表 4 腔口空气通道长度l₁对低频带隙的影响

Table 4. Effect of the parameter l₁ on low-frequency band gaps.

l₁/mm	第一带隙下限		第一带隙上限		第二带隙下限		第二带隙上限		第三带隙下限		第三带隙上限
l₁/mm	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%
99	88.4	4.4	119.1	5.7	302.1	3.4	533.0	1.3	772.3	3.4	891.4	2.4
99	92.3	4.4	125.9	5.7	312.5	3.4	540.0	1.3	798.6	3.4	912.9	2.4
148	74.5	3.4	101.5	5.1	301.2	3.5	513.3	1.1	772.6	3.4	873.7	2.4
148	77.1	3.4	106.7	5.1	311.7	3.5	519.1	1.1	798.9	3.4	894.4	2.4
197	66.0	2.9	89.9	4.7	301.9	3.5	500.0	1.1	772.4	3.3	836.0	1.9
197	67.9	2.9	94.1	4.7	312.5	3.5	505.3	1.1	798.2	3.3	851.8	1.9
246	60.1	2.6	81.4	4.5	303.2	3.5	488.5	1.0	697.6	1.2	734.1	0.9
246	61.7	2.6	85.1	4.5	313.7	3.5	493.3	1.0	705.9	1.2	740.6	0.9
295	55.8	2.5	75.0	4.3	304.7	3.4	475.7	0.9	587.8	0.7	637.5	0.7
295	57.2	2.5	78.2	4.3	315.2	3.4	479.9	0.9	591.9	0.7	642.3	0.7
344	52.5	2.4	69.8	4.2	306.3	3.4	458.4	0.7	507.5	0.6	558.9	3.1
344	53.7	2.4	72.7	4.2	316.6	3.4	461.5	0.7	510.8	0.6	576.4	3.1

DownLoad: CSV

表 5 内腔体积V₂对低频带隙的影响

Table 5. Effect of the parameter V₂ on low-frequency band gaps.

V₂/10^–4 m³	第一带隙下限		第一带隙上限		第二带隙下限		第二带隙上限		第三带隙下限		第三带隙上限
V₂/10^–4 m³	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%	FEM TMM	误差/%
7.07	108.5	6.3	120.5	5.8	406.9	1.0	566.2	1.0	809.9	1.9	953.1	1.2
7.07	115.3	6.3	127.6	5.8	411.0	1.0	571.8	1.0	825.3	1.9	964.2	1.2
10.57	103.3	4.8	121.1	4.8	361.4	1.6	558.3	–0.1	796.5	1.9	925.4	1.4
10.57	108.3	4.8	126.8	4.8	367.2	1.6	557.8	–0.1	811.4	1.9	938.7	1.4
14.07	98.0	4.2	121.0	4.4	335.0	1.9	550.0	–0.1	790.9	1.8	913.1	1.4
14.07	102.2	4.2	126.4	4.4	341.3	1.9	549.4	–0.1	804.9	1.8	925.8	1.4
17.57	93.3	3.9	120.9	4.3	317.7	2.1	544.4	–0.1	788.3	1.6	906.5	1.3
17.57	96.9	3.9	126.1	4.3	324.4	2.1	543.9	–0.1	801.1	1.6	918.1	1.3
19.32	91.1	3.8	120.8	4.3	311.1	2.2	542.3	–0.1	787.4	1.6	904.1	1.2
19.32	94.5	3.8	126.0	4.3	317.9	2.2	541.8	–0.1	799.7	1.6	915.3	1.2

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Kushwaha M S, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 2022 Google Scholar
[2]	王莎, 林书玉 2019 68 024303 Google Scholar Wang S, Lin S Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 024303 Google Scholar
[3]	张振方, 郁殿龙, 刘江伟, 温激鸿 2018 67 074301 Google Scholar Zhang Z F, Yu D L, Liu J W, Wen J H 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 074301 Google Scholar
[4]	廖涛, 孙小伟, 宋婷, 田俊红, 康太凤, 孙伟彬 2018 67 214208 Google Scholar Liao T, Sun X W, Song T, Tian J H, Kang T F, Sun W B 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 214208 Google Scholar
[5]	Li S B, Dou Y H, Chen T N, Wan Z G, Guan Z R 2018 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 32 1850221
[6]	Korozlu N, Kaya O A, Cicek A, Ulug B 2018 J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143 756 Google Scholar
[7]	Quan L, Ra Di Y, Sounas D L, Alù A 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 254301 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhao L X, Zhou S X 2019 Sensors-Basel 19 788 Google Scholar
[9]	Yuan M, Cao Z, Luo J, Pang Z 2018 AIP Adv. 8 85012 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang Y, Zhu X, Zhang T S, Bano S, Pan H Y, Qi L F, Zhang Z T, Yuan Y P 2018 Appl. Energ. 230 52 Google Scholar
[11]	Quan L, Qian F, Liu X Z, Gong X F, Johnson P A 2015 Phys. Rev. B 92 104105 Google Scholar
[12]	Quan L, Zhong X, Liu X, Gong X, Johnson P A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 3188 Google Scholar
[13]	Hu X, Chan C T, Zi J 2005 Phys. Rev. E 71 55601 Google Scholar
[14]	Chalmers L, Elford D P, Kusmartsev F V, Swallowe G M 2009 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23 4234 Google Scholar
[15]	Guan D, Wu J H, Jing L, Gao N, Hou M 2015 Noise Control Eng. J. 63 20 Google Scholar
[16]	Jiang J, Yao H, Du J, Zhao J 2016 AIP Adv. 6 115024 Google Scholar
[17]	姜久龙, 姚宏, 杜军, 赵静波, 邓涛 2017 66 064301 Google Scholar Jiang J L, Yao H, Du J, Zhao J B, Deng T 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 064301 Google Scholar
[18]	刘敏, 侯志林, 傅秀军 2012 61 104302 Google Scholar Liu M, Hou Z L, Fu X J 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 104302 Google Scholar
[19]	包凯, 陈天宁, 王小鹏, 王放, 张振华 2016 西安交通大学学报 50 124 Google Scholar Bao K, Chen T N, Wang X P, Wang F, Zhang Z H 2016 J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 50 124 Google Scholar
[20]	Liu C R, Wu J H, Chen X, Ma F Y 2019 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52 105302 Google Scholar
[21]	Ang L Y L, Koh Y K, Lee H P 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 41903 Google Scholar
[22]	Wang X, Zhao H, Luo X, Huang Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 41905 Google Scholar
[23]	Langfeldt F, Gleine W, von Estorff O 2015 J. Sound Vib. 349 315 Google Scholar
[24]	周榕, 吴卫国, 闻轶凡 2017 声学技术 36 297 Zhou R, Wu W G, Wen Y F 2017 Technical Acoustics 36 297
[25]	Abbad A, Rabenorosoa K, Ouisse M, Atalla N, Park G 2017 Proc. SPIE 10164 101640P
[26]	Langfeldt F, von Estorff O 2016 Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings 253 3413
[27]	Elayouch A, Addouche M, Herth E, Khelif A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 83504 Google Scholar
[28]	Liu C R, Wu J H, Lu K, Zhao Z T, Huang Z 2019 Appl. Acoust. 148 1 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhu X, Chen Z, Jiao Y, Wang Y 2018 J.Vibr. Acoust. 140 31014 Google Scholar
[30]	陈鑫, 姚宏, 赵静波, 张帅, 贺子厚, 蒋娟娜 2019 68 084302 Google Scholar Chen X, Yao H, Zhao J B, Zhang S, He Z H, Jiang J N 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 084302 Google Scholar
[31]	芮筱亭, 贠来峰, 陆毓琪, 何斌, 王国平 2008 多体系统的传递矩阵法及其应用 (北京: 科学出版社) 第425页 Rui X T, Yuan L F, Lu Y Q, He B, Wang G P 2008 Transfer Matrix Method of Multibody System and Its Applications (Beijing: Science Press) p425 (in Chinese)
[32]	倪振华 1989 振动力学 (西安: 西安交通大学出版社) 第410页 Nie Z H 1989 Vibration Mechanics (Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press) p410 (in Chinese)

[1]	Han Dong-Hai, Zhang Guang-Jun, Zhao Jing-Bo, Yao Hong. Low-frequency bandgaps and sound isolation characteristics of a novel Helmholtz-type phononic crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 114301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211932
[2]	Tan Zi-Hao, Sun Xiao-Wei, Song Ting, Wen Xiao-Dong, Liu Xi-Xuan, Liu Zi-Jiang. Numerical simulation study on band gap characteristics of surface phononic crystal with spherical composite column. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(14): 144301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210165
[3]	Shen Hui-Jie, Yu Dian-Long, Tang Zhi-Yin, Su Yong-Sheng, Li Yan-Fei, Liu Jiang-Wei. Characteristics of low-frequency noise elimination in a fluid-filled pipe of dark acoustic metamaterial type. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 144301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190311
[4]	Jia Ding, Ge Yong, Yuan Shou-Qi, Sun Hong-Xiang. Dual-band acoustic topological insulator based on honeycomb lattice sonic crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(22): 224301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190951
[5]	Chen Xin, Yao Hong, Zhao Jing-Bo, Zhang Shuai, He Zi-Hou, Jiang Juan-Na. Band gap of structure coupling Helmholtz resonator with elastic oscillator. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(8): 084302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182102
[6]	Du Chun-Yang, Yu Dian-Long, Liu Jiang-Wei, Wen Ji-Hong. Flexural vibration band gaps for a phononic crystal beam with X-shaped local resonance metadamping structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(14): 140701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.140701
[7]	Jiang Jiu-Long, Yao Hong, Du Jun, Zhao Jing-Bo, Deng Tao. Low frequency band gap characteristics of double-split Helmholtz locally resonant periodic structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(6): 064301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.064301
[8]	Gao Dong-Bao, Liu Xuan-Jun, Tian Zhang-Fu, Zhou Ze-Min, Zeng Xin-Wu, Han Kai-Feng. A broadband low-frequency sound insulation structure based on two-dimensionally inbuilt Helmholtz resonator. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(1): 014307. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.014307
[9]	Hou Li-Na, Hou Zhi-Lin, Fu Xiu-Jun. Defect state of the locally resonant phononic crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(3): 034305. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.034305
[10]	Cheng Cong, Wu Fu-Gen, Zhang Xin, Yao Yuan-Wei. Phononic crystal multi-channel low-frequency filter based on locally resonant unit. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(2): 024301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.024301
[11]	Gao Dong-Bao, Zeng Xin-Wu, Zhou Ze-Min, Tian Zhang-Fu. Experiments on defect mode of one-dimensional phononic crystal containing Helmholtz resonators. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(9): 094304. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094304
[12]	Zhang Si-Wen, Wu Jiu-Hui. Low-frequency band gaps in phononic crystals with composite locally resonant structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(13): 134302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.134302
[13]	Hu Jia-Guang, Xu Wen, Xiao Yi-Ming, Zhang Ya-Ya. The two-dimensional phononic crystal band gaps tuned by the symmetry and orientation of the additional rods in the center of unit cell. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 234302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.234302
[14]	Wen Qi-Hua, Zuo Shu-Guang, Wei Huan. Locally resonant elastic wave band gaps in flexural vibration of multi-oscillators beam. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(3): 034301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.034301
[15]	Chen Sheng-Bing, Han Xiao-Yun, Yu Dian-Long, Wen Ji-Hong. Influences of different types of piezoelectric shunting circuits on band gaps of phononic beam. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(1): 387-392. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.387
[16]	Zhong Hui-Lin, Wu Fu-Gen, Yao Li-Ning. Application of genetic algorithm in optimization of band gap of two-dimensional phononic crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(1): 275-280. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.275
[17]	Wang Wen-Gang, Liu Zheng-You, Zhao De-Gang, Ke Man-Zhu. Resonant tunneling of acoustic waves in 1D phononic crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(9): 4744-4747. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4744
[18]	Zhao Fang, Yuan Li-Bo. Characteristics of the band structure in two-dimensional phononic crystals with complex lattices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(10): 4511-4516. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4511
[19]	Wen Ji-Hong, Wang Gang, Liu Yao-Zong, Yu Dian-Long. Lumped-mass method on calculation of elastic band gaps of one-dimensional phononic crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(10): 3384-3388. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3384
[20]	Wang Gang, Wen Ji-Hong, Han Xiao-Yun, Zhao Hong-Gang. Finite difference time domain method for the study of band gap in two-dimensiona l phononic crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(8): 1943-1947. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1943

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 21 - 2019-11-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 8415
PDF Downloads: 140
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板