-
As the demand for electronic devices increases continually, the spintronic materials have played an important role in materials science and electronics. Spintronic devices have excellent properties such as non-volatility, low power consumption, and high integration compared with conventional semiconductor devices. In this paper, we investigate the electronic structure, magnetic and optical properties of the semiconductor GaSb doped with 3d transition metal Cr, based on first-principles calculations. The compounds are constructed by replacing some Ga atoms with Cr in zinc-blende GaSb semiconductor, where the concentrations of the Ga atoms replaced are 0, 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75. We adopt the projected plane wave method and the electronic exchange correlation functional PBE in the generalized gradient approximation. Band gap is modified by Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) functional. We study the equilibrium lattice constants of Cr-doped GaSb in zinc-blende structure at different concentrations. The energy of nonmagnetic, ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states at the equilibrium lattice constants are compared to identify the ground state. For Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75), we find that the most stable state is ferromagnetic state. In the electronic structure of the ground state, the spin-up bands pass through the Fermi level while the spin-down bands each have a direct band gap. The Ga1–xCrxSb exhibit ferromagnetic half-metallic properties. The magnetic properties at different lattice constants under different concentrations are studied. Our analysis indicates that the Ga1–xCrxSb have integer Bohr magnetic moments of 3.0, 6.0, 9.0 μB for x = 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75, respectively. We find that when the lattice changes fom –5% to 20%, the total magnetic moment for each of Ga1–xCrxSb still remains the integer Bohr magnetic moment, and the magnetic moment of the Cr increases with the lattice constant increasing. We also find that the ferromagnetisms of Ga1–xCrxSb have Curie temperatures above room temperature, estimated by mean-field method. The p-d electron hybridization occurs in Cr-3d orbital and Sb-5p orbital, and the electron state density distribution of Cr-3d is transferred, that is, the electron orbital hybridization makes the total electron state density of crystal material redistributed, which is the main reason why Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75) present ferromagnetic half-metallic properties. Additionally, the Ga1–xCrxSb have good absorption ability in the infrared region, compatible with zinc-blende semiconductors such as GaSb, which makes Ga1–xCrxSb have promising potential applications in both spintronic devices and infrared optoelectronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- first-principles /
- Cr ion implantation /
- electronics structure /
- optical properties
[1] Prinz G A 1998 Science 282 1660Google Scholar
[2] Ohno H, Munekata H, Penney T, von Molnar S, Chang L L 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2664Google Scholar
[3] Groot R A D, Mueller F M, Engen P G V, Buschow K H J 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 2024Google Scholar
[4] Chen S, Ren Z 2013 Mater. Today 16 387Google Scholar
[5] Watts S M, Wirth S, Von Molnár S, Barry A, Coey J M D 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 9621Google Scholar
[6] Xie W H, Liu B G 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 3559Google Scholar
[7] Doumi B, Mokaddem A, Temimi L, Beldjoudi N, Elkeurti M, Dahmane F, Sayede A, Tadjer A, Ishak-Boushaki M 2015 Eur. Phys. J. B 88 93
[8] Pickett W E, Moodera J S 2001 Phys. Today 54 39Google Scholar
[9] Osborne Ian S 2001 Science 294 1483Google Scholar
[10] Zutic I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323
[11] Katsnelson M I, Irkhin V Y, Chioncel L, Lichtenstein A I, de Groot R A 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 315Google Scholar
[12] Chadov S, Graf T, Chadova K, Casper F, Fecher G H, Dai X F, Felser C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 047202Google Scholar
[13] Alijani V, Winterlik J, Fecher G H, Naghavi S S, Felser C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 184428Google Scholar
[14] Liu H, Zhang J M 2017 Phys. Status Solidi B 254 1700098Google Scholar
[15] Lin H F, Lau W M, Zhao J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 45869Google Scholar
[16] Coey J M D 2005 Solid State Sci. 7 660Google Scholar
[17] Yang K, Wu R, Shen L, Feng Y P, Dai Y, Huang B 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 125211Google Scholar
[18] Katayama-Yoshida H, Sato K 2003 Physica B 327 337Google Scholar
[19] Tu N T, Hai P N, Anh L D, Tanaka M 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 192401Google Scholar
[20] Anh L D, Kaneko D, Hai P N, Tanaka M 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 232405Google Scholar
[21] Ahmad I, Amin B 2013 Comput. Mater. Sci. 68 55Google Scholar
[22] 黄保瑞, 张富春, 王海洋 2016 电子元件与材料 35 34
Huang B R, Zhang F C, Wang H Y 2016 Electronic Components and Materials 35 34
[23] Shirai M 2001 Physica E 10 143Google Scholar
[24] Hass M, Henvis B W 1962 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23 1099Google Scholar
[25] Ehrenreich H 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 2155Google Scholar
[26] Liu Y, Liu B G 2007 J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 40 6791Google Scholar
[27] Noor N A, Ali S, Shaukat A 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 72 836Google Scholar
[28] Rahman G, Cho S, Hong S C 2007 Phys. Status Solidi B 244 4435
[29] Shinya H, Fukushima T, Masago A, Sato K, Katayama-Yoshida H 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 103902Google Scholar
[30] Luo K W, Xu L, Wang L L, Li Q, Wang Z 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 117 300Google Scholar
[31] Abe E, Sato K, Matsukura F, Zhao J H, Ohno Y, Ohno H 2004 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 17 349Google Scholar
[32] Seña N, Dussan A, Mesa F, Castaño E, González-Hernández R 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 051704Google Scholar
[33] Milnes A G, Polyakov A Y 1993 Solid-State Electron. 36 803Google Scholar
[34] Zhang H I, Callaway J 1969 Phys. Rev. 181 1163Google Scholar
[35] Ahmed R, Hashemifar S J, Rashid H, Akbarzadeh H 2009 Commun. Theor. Phys. 52 527Google Scholar
[36] Schottky W F, Bever M B 1958 Acta Metall. 6 320Google Scholar
[37] Bennett B R, Soref R A 1987 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23 2159Google Scholar
[38] Aspnes D E, Studna A A 1983 Phys. Rev. B 27 985Google Scholar
[39] Wei Y, Gin A, Razeghi M, Brown G J 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3675Google Scholar
[40] Rothmayr F, Pfenning A, Kistner C, Koeth J, Knebl G, Schade A, Höfling S 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 161107Google Scholar
[41] Lin X, Pan F 2018 Mater. Res. Express 6 015901Google Scholar
[42] Liu L H, Yu L H 2015 Intermetallics 57 139Google Scholar
[43] Varshney D, Joshi G, Varshney M, Shriya S 2010 Physica B 405 1663Google Scholar
[44] Amin B, Arif S, Ahmad I, Maqbool M, Ahmad R, Goumri-Said S, Prisbrey K 2011 J. Electron. Mater. 40 1428Google Scholar
[45] Dresselhaus G 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 580Google Scholar
[46] Cohen M L, Bergstresser T K 1966 Phys. Rev. 141 789Google Scholar
[47] Zerouali A, Mokaddem A, Doumi B, Dahmane F, Elkeurti M, Sayede A, Tadjer A 2016 J. Comput. Electron. 15 1255Google Scholar
[48] Liu X, Fan H Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 86104Google Scholar
[49] Peng G W, Gan X P, Li Z, Zhou K C 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 86302Google Scholar
[50] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 13115Google Scholar
[51] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[52] Kresse G 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[53] Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson K A, Pederson M R, Singh D J, Fiolhais C 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 6671
[54] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[55] Batista E R, Heyd J, Hennig R G, Uberuaga B P, Martin R L, Scuseria G E, Wilkins J W 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 121102Google Scholar
[56] Heyd J, Scuseria G E, Ernzerhof M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 8207Google Scholar
[57] Cang Y P, Lian S B, Yang H M, Chen D 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 66301Google Scholar
[58] Zhu Z Y, Wang S Q, Fu Y M 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 26302Google Scholar
[59] Wu J H, Liu C X 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 36202Google Scholar
[60] 原野, 田博博, 段纯刚 2018 67 157511Google Scholar
Yuan Y, Tian B B, Duan C G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 157511Google Scholar
[61] Shirai M 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 6844Google Scholar
[62] Cheng Y C, Zhu Z Y, Mi W B, Guo Z B, Schwingenschlögl U 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 100401
[63] Fukushima T, Sato K, Katayama-Yoshida H, Dederichs P H 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 L1416Google Scholar
[64] Şaşıoğlu E, Sandratskii L M, Bruno P 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 024427Google Scholar
[65] Liu B G 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 172411
[66] Kim Y S, Marsman M, Kresse G, Tran F, Blaha P 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 205212Google Scholar
[67] Guo S D, Liu B G 2011 EPL 93 47006Google Scholar
[68] Zheng F, Zhou G, Liu Z, Wu J, Duan W, Gu B L, Zhang S B 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 205415Google Scholar
[69] De Paiva R, Nogueira R A, Alves J L A 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 6565Google Scholar
[70] Chen Z Y, Xu B, Gao G Y 2013 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 347 14Google Scholar
[71] Arif S, Ahmad I, Amin B 2012 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 112 882Google Scholar
[72] Nabi A, Akhtar Z, Iqbal T, Ali A, Javid M A 2017 J. Semicond. 38 073001
[73] 王逸飞, 李晓薇 2018 67 116301Google Scholar
Wang Y F, Li X W 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 116301Google Scholar
-
图 2 晶体Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75)结构优化的能量-体积关系图 (a) Ga0.75Cr0.25Sb; (b) Ga0.5Cr0.5Sb; (c) Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb; (d) Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb的铁磁态及两种反铁磁性磁序分布
Figure 2. The energy-volume curve of Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75): (a) Ga0.75Cr0.25Sb; (b) Ga0.5Cr0.5Sb; (c) Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb; (d) the FM is ferromagnetic state and AFM stands for two types of antiferromagnetic state for Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb.
图 3 Ga1–xCrxSb单胞总磁矩及Cr-d轨道和Sb-p轨道贡献磁矩随晶格变化图 同一颜色的表示是同一浓度材料, 线上的方块、三角、圆形分别表示总磁矩、Cr原子d轨道贡献磁矩和Sb原子p轨道贡献磁矩
Figure 3. The total magnetic moment per formula and the contribution of magnetic moment from Cr-d and Sb-p orbits as a function of the relative change of lattice constant of Ga1–xCrxSb. The same color represents the same concentration. The square, triangle and circle on the line represent the total magnetic moment, the contribution magnetic moment of the Cr atom d-orbit, and the magnetic moment of the Sb atom p-orbit, respectively.
表 1 Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00)总磁矩Mtot/NCr, Cr原子d轨道磁矩MCr, Sb原子p轨道磁矩MSb, 居里温度, 其中SM表示半导体, HMF表示半金属铁磁体
Table 1. Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) magnetic moment Mtot/NCr, Cr atom d-orbit magnetic moment MCr, Sb atom p-orbit magnetic moment MSb, Curie temperature, SM and HMF represent semiconductor and half-metal ferromagnetic, respectively.
Mtot/NCr/μB MCr/μB MSb/μB 居里温度/K 基态性质 材料性质 GaSb 0 — — — NF SM Ga0.75Cr0.25Sb 3.00 3.266 –0.124 872 FM HMF Ga0.5Cr0.5Sb 3.00 3.113 –0.143 1104 FM HMF Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb 3.00 3.224 –0.176 1372 FM HMF CrSb 3.00 3.154 –0.152 1600[61] FM HMF 表 2 Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00)系列晶体各项性质, a0表示平衡晶格常数, LCS表示Cr—Sb键长, LGS表示Ga—Sb键长, HMHSE表示用HSE方法得到的半金属能隙(eV), HMPBE表示用PBE方法得到的半金属能隙(eV), SMHSE表示用HSE方法得到的半导体能隙(eV), SMPBE表示用PBE方法得到的半导体能隙(eV)
Table 2. Crystals Properties of Ga1–xCrxSb (x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00), the equilibrium lattice constant a0, Cr—Sb bond length LCS, Ga—Sb bond length LGS, the half-metal gap (eV) calculated by HSE HMHSE, denotes the half-metal gap (eV) calculated by PBE HMPBE, the semiconductor gap (eV) calculated by HSE SMHSE, and the semiconductor gap (eV) calculated by PBE SMPBE.
a0/Å LCS/Å LGS/Å HMHSE HMPBE SMHSE SMPBE GaSb 6.095 — 2.638 — — 0.526 0.083 0.720[66] 0.110[66] Ga0.75Cr0.25Sb 6.210 2.652 2.702 0.137 0.121 1.275 0.637 Ga0.5Cr0.5Sb 6.181 2.653 2.713 0.403 — 1.281 0.653 Ga0.25Cr0.75Sb 6.159 2.654 2.725 0.613 — 1.305 0.664 CrSb 6.128 2.654 — 0.657 0.750 2.327 1.52 0.774[65] 1.646[65] 0.751[67] 1.650[67] -
[1] Prinz G A 1998 Science 282 1660Google Scholar
[2] Ohno H, Munekata H, Penney T, von Molnar S, Chang L L 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 2664Google Scholar
[3] Groot R A D, Mueller F M, Engen P G V, Buschow K H J 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 2024Google Scholar
[4] Chen S, Ren Z 2013 Mater. Today 16 387Google Scholar
[5] Watts S M, Wirth S, Von Molnár S, Barry A, Coey J M D 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 9621Google Scholar
[6] Xie W H, Liu B G 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 3559Google Scholar
[7] Doumi B, Mokaddem A, Temimi L, Beldjoudi N, Elkeurti M, Dahmane F, Sayede A, Tadjer A, Ishak-Boushaki M 2015 Eur. Phys. J. B 88 93
[8] Pickett W E, Moodera J S 2001 Phys. Today 54 39Google Scholar
[9] Osborne Ian S 2001 Science 294 1483Google Scholar
[10] Zutic I, Fabian J, Sarma S D 2004 Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 323
[11] Katsnelson M I, Irkhin V Y, Chioncel L, Lichtenstein A I, de Groot R A 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 315Google Scholar
[12] Chadov S, Graf T, Chadova K, Casper F, Fecher G H, Dai X F, Felser C 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 047202Google Scholar
[13] Alijani V, Winterlik J, Fecher G H, Naghavi S S, Felser C 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 184428Google Scholar
[14] Liu H, Zhang J M 2017 Phys. Status Solidi B 254 1700098Google Scholar
[15] Lin H F, Lau W M, Zhao J 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 45869Google Scholar
[16] Coey J M D 2005 Solid State Sci. 7 660Google Scholar
[17] Yang K, Wu R, Shen L, Feng Y P, Dai Y, Huang B 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 125211Google Scholar
[18] Katayama-Yoshida H, Sato K 2003 Physica B 327 337Google Scholar
[19] Tu N T, Hai P N, Anh L D, Tanaka M 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 192401Google Scholar
[20] Anh L D, Kaneko D, Hai P N, Tanaka M 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 232405Google Scholar
[21] Ahmad I, Amin B 2013 Comput. Mater. Sci. 68 55Google Scholar
[22] 黄保瑞, 张富春, 王海洋 2016 电子元件与材料 35 34
Huang B R, Zhang F C, Wang H Y 2016 Electronic Components and Materials 35 34
[23] Shirai M 2001 Physica E 10 143Google Scholar
[24] Hass M, Henvis B W 1962 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23 1099Google Scholar
[25] Ehrenreich H 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32 2155Google Scholar
[26] Liu Y, Liu B G 2007 J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 40 6791Google Scholar
[27] Noor N A, Ali S, Shaukat A 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Solids 72 836Google Scholar
[28] Rahman G, Cho S, Hong S C 2007 Phys. Status Solidi B 244 4435
[29] Shinya H, Fukushima T, Masago A, Sato K, Katayama-Yoshida H 2018 J. Appl. Phys. 124 103902Google Scholar
[30] Luo K W, Xu L, Wang L L, Li Q, Wang Z 2016 Comput. Mater. Sci. 117 300Google Scholar
[31] Abe E, Sato K, Matsukura F, Zhao J H, Ohno Y, Ohno H 2004 J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 17 349Google Scholar
[32] Seña N, Dussan A, Mesa F, Castaño E, González-Hernández R 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 051704Google Scholar
[33] Milnes A G, Polyakov A Y 1993 Solid-State Electron. 36 803Google Scholar
[34] Zhang H I, Callaway J 1969 Phys. Rev. 181 1163Google Scholar
[35] Ahmed R, Hashemifar S J, Rashid H, Akbarzadeh H 2009 Commun. Theor. Phys. 52 527Google Scholar
[36] Schottky W F, Bever M B 1958 Acta Metall. 6 320Google Scholar
[37] Bennett B R, Soref R A 1987 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23 2159Google Scholar
[38] Aspnes D E, Studna A A 1983 Phys. Rev. B 27 985Google Scholar
[39] Wei Y, Gin A, Razeghi M, Brown G J 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3675Google Scholar
[40] Rothmayr F, Pfenning A, Kistner C, Koeth J, Knebl G, Schade A, Höfling S 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 161107Google Scholar
[41] Lin X, Pan F 2018 Mater. Res. Express 6 015901Google Scholar
[42] Liu L H, Yu L H 2015 Intermetallics 57 139Google Scholar
[43] Varshney D, Joshi G, Varshney M, Shriya S 2010 Physica B 405 1663Google Scholar
[44] Amin B, Arif S, Ahmad I, Maqbool M, Ahmad R, Goumri-Said S, Prisbrey K 2011 J. Electron. Mater. 40 1428Google Scholar
[45] Dresselhaus G 1955 Phys. Rev. 100 580Google Scholar
[46] Cohen M L, Bergstresser T K 1966 Phys. Rev. 141 789Google Scholar
[47] Zerouali A, Mokaddem A, Doumi B, Dahmane F, Elkeurti M, Sayede A, Tadjer A 2016 J. Comput. Electron. 15 1255Google Scholar
[48] Liu X, Fan H Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 86104Google Scholar
[49] Peng G W, Gan X P, Li Z, Zhou K C 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 86302Google Scholar
[50] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 48 13115Google Scholar
[51] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[52] Kresse G 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[53] Perdew J P, Chevary J A, Vosko S H, Jackson K A, Pederson M R, Singh D J, Fiolhais C 1992 Phys. Rev. B 46 6671
[54] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
[55] Batista E R, Heyd J, Hennig R G, Uberuaga B P, Martin R L, Scuseria G E, Wilkins J W 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 121102Google Scholar
[56] Heyd J, Scuseria G E, Ernzerhof M 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 8207Google Scholar
[57] Cang Y P, Lian S B, Yang H M, Chen D 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 66301Google Scholar
[58] Zhu Z Y, Wang S Q, Fu Y M 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 26302Google Scholar
[59] Wu J H, Liu C X 2016 Chin. Phys. Lett. 33 36202Google Scholar
[60] 原野, 田博博, 段纯刚 2018 67 157511Google Scholar
Yuan Y, Tian B B, Duan C G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 157511Google Scholar
[61] Shirai M 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 6844Google Scholar
[62] Cheng Y C, Zhu Z Y, Mi W B, Guo Z B, Schwingenschlögl U 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 100401
[63] Fukushima T, Sato K, Katayama-Yoshida H, Dederichs P H 2004 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43 L1416Google Scholar
[64] Şaşıoğlu E, Sandratskii L M, Bruno P 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 024427Google Scholar
[65] Liu B G 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 172411
[66] Kim Y S, Marsman M, Kresse G, Tran F, Blaha P 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 205212Google Scholar
[67] Guo S D, Liu B G 2011 EPL 93 47006Google Scholar
[68] Zheng F, Zhou G, Liu Z, Wu J, Duan W, Gu B L, Zhang S B 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 205415Google Scholar
[69] De Paiva R, Nogueira R A, Alves J L A 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 6565Google Scholar
[70] Chen Z Y, Xu B, Gao G Y 2013 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 347 14Google Scholar
[71] Arif S, Ahmad I, Amin B 2012 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 112 882Google Scholar
[72] Nabi A, Akhtar Z, Iqbal T, Ali A, Javid M A 2017 J. Semicond. 38 073001
[73] 王逸飞, 李晓薇 2018 67 116301Google Scholar
Wang Y F, Li X W 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 116301Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 9380
- PDF Downloads: 99
- Cited By: 0