-
Based on first-principles calculations, the electronic structure, the transport and optical properties of TiOCl2 monolayer are systematically investigated. The vibrational, thermodynamic, and mechanical properties of TiOCl2 monolayer are studied by phonon spectrum, molecular dynamics and elastic constants calculations. All these results indicate that the TiOCl2 monolayer possesses good structural stability at room temperature and excellent mechanical properties. The electronic structure analysis shows that the TiOCl2 is an indirect band gap (1.92 eV) semiconductor. Its band structure can be significantly affected by in-plane stress. Specifically, the TiOCl2 monolayer undergoes an indirect-to-direct band gap transition under –4% uniaxial stress along the a-axis and the gap size decreases to 1.66 eV. Moreover, the TiOCl2 monolayer exhibits obvious anisotropy characteristics, and its electron mobility is 803 cm2·V–1·s–1 along the b-axis, whereas the hole mobility reaches 2537 cm2·V–1·s–1 along the a-axis. The wave peaks (valleys) of the absorptivity, reflectivity and transmittance shift toward the violet part of the visible band by the stress. All these appealing properties make the TiOCl2 monolayer a promising candidate for applications in optoelectronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- TiOCl2 monolayer /
- first-principles /
- electronic structure /
- optical properties
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Singh E, Singh P, Kim K S, Yeom G Y, Nalwa H S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 11061Google Scholar
[3] Gong C, Hu K, Wang X, Wangyang P, Yan C, Chu J, Liao M, Dai L, Zhai T, Wang C, Li L, Xiong J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706559Google Scholar
[4] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar
[5] An M, Dong S 2020 APL Mater. 8 110704Google Scholar
[6] Iannaccone G, Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Fiori G 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 183Google Scholar
[7] Bhimanapati G R, Lin Z, Meunier V, Jung Y, Cha J, Das S, Xiao D, Son Y, Strano M S, Cooper V R, Liang L, Louie S G, Ringe E, Zhou W, Kim S S, Naik R R, Sumpter B G, Terrones H, Xia F, Wang Y, Zhu J, Akinwande D, Alem N, Schuller J A, Schaak R E, Terrones M, Robinson J A 2015 ACS Nano 9 11509Google Scholar
[8] Xia F, Wang H, Hwang J C M, Neto A H C, Yang L 2019 Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 306Google Scholar
[9] Mannix A J, Kiraly B, Hersam M C, Guisinger N P 2017 Nat. Rev. Chem. 1 0014Google Scholar
[10] 徐依全, 王聪 2020 69 184216Google Scholar
Xu Y Q, Wang C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184216Google Scholar
[11] Xia F, Mueller T, Lin Y M, Valdes-Garcia A, Avouris P 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 839Google Scholar
[12] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611Google Scholar
[13] Bao W, Jing L, Jr J V, Lee Y, Liu G, Tran D, Standley B, Aykol M, Cronin S B, Smirnov D, Koshino M, McCann E, Bockrath M, Lau C N 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 948Google Scholar
[14] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147Google Scholar
[15] Fuhrer M S, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 146Google Scholar
[16] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar
[17] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G J, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen X H, Zhang Y 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 372Google Scholar
[18] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X, Tománek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar
[19] Wood J D, Wells S A, Jariwala D, Chen K S, Cho E, Sangwan V K, Liu X, Lauhon L J, Marks T J, Hersam M C 2014 Nano Lett. 14 6964Google Scholar
[20] You H P, Ding N, Chen J, Dong S 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 24109Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[24] Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar
[25] Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355Google Scholar
[26] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
[27] Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A, Singh A K 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3290Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Q, Yuan J H, Li L H, Xu M, Wang J F, Xue K H, Miao X S 2019 Nanoscale 11 1131Google Scholar
[29] Xu L C, Du A, Kou L 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 27284Google Scholar
[30] Cadelano E, Palla P L, Giordano S, Colombo L 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235414Google Scholar
[31] Li Y, Yu C, Gan Y, Kong Y, Jiang P, Zou D F, Li P, Yu X F, Wu R, Zhao H, Gao C F, Li J 2019 Nanotechnology. 30 335703Google Scholar
[32] Liu F, Ming P, Li J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 064120Google Scholar
[33] Miao N, Xu B, Bristowe N C, Zhou J, Sun Z 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 11125Google Scholar
[34] Hur T B, Hwang Y H, Kim H K, Lee I J 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 64308Google Scholar
[35] Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72Google Scholar
[36] Yu T, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Bergara A, Lin J, Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Yang G, Liu Y 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 1599Google Scholar
[37] Sarker H P, Rao P M, Huda M N 2019 Chem. Phys. Chem. 20 773Google Scholar
[38] Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 6269Google Scholar
[39] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 205408Google Scholar
[40] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2014 New J. Phys. 16 105007Google Scholar
-
表 1 沿a方向ε = 0%和ε = –4%时, 单层TiOCl2沿a, b方向的载流子有效质量及迁移率
Table 1. Calculated effective mass and carrier mobility for TiOCl2 monolayer under different uniaxial strain.
strain carrier ma/m0 mb/m0 μa
/(cm2·V–1·s–1)μb
/(cm2·V–1·s–1)ε = 0% electron 135.14 0.89 0.11 157.32 hole 1.33 2.14 347.72 113.97 ε = –4% electron 11.14 0.69 5.45 802.71 hole 0.36 1.98 2537.25 246.15 -
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Singh E, Singh P, Kim K S, Yeom G Y, Nalwa H S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 11061Google Scholar
[3] Gong C, Hu K, Wang X, Wangyang P, Yan C, Chu J, Liao M, Dai L, Zhai T, Wang C, Li L, Xiong J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706559Google Scholar
[4] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699Google Scholar
[5] An M, Dong S 2020 APL Mater. 8 110704Google Scholar
[6] Iannaccone G, Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Fiori G 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 183Google Scholar
[7] Bhimanapati G R, Lin Z, Meunier V, Jung Y, Cha J, Das S, Xiao D, Son Y, Strano M S, Cooper V R, Liang L, Louie S G, Ringe E, Zhou W, Kim S S, Naik R R, Sumpter B G, Terrones H, Xia F, Wang Y, Zhu J, Akinwande D, Alem N, Schuller J A, Schaak R E, Terrones M, Robinson J A 2015 ACS Nano 9 11509Google Scholar
[8] Xia F, Wang H, Hwang J C M, Neto A H C, Yang L 2019 Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 306Google Scholar
[9] Mannix A J, Kiraly B, Hersam M C, Guisinger N P 2017 Nat. Rev. Chem. 1 0014Google Scholar
[10] 徐依全, 王聪 2020 69 184216Google Scholar
Xu Y Q, Wang C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184216Google Scholar
[11] Xia F, Mueller T, Lin Y M, Valdes-Garcia A, Avouris P 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 839Google Scholar
[12] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611Google Scholar
[13] Bao W, Jing L, Jr J V, Lee Y, Liu G, Tran D, Standley B, Aykol M, Cronin S B, Smirnov D, Koshino M, McCann E, Bockrath M, Lau C N 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 948Google Scholar
[14] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147Google Scholar
[15] Fuhrer M S, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 146Google Scholar
[16] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805Google Scholar
[17] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G J, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen X H, Zhang Y 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 372Google Scholar
[18] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X, Tománek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033Google Scholar
[19] Wood J D, Wells S A, Jariwala D, Chen K S, Cho E, Sangwan V K, Liu X, Lauhon L J, Marks T J, Hersam M C 2014 Nano Lett. 14 6964Google Scholar
[20] You H P, Ding N, Chen J, Dong S 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 24109Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[24] Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188Google Scholar
[25] Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355Google Scholar
[26] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
[27] Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A, Singh A K 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3290Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Q, Yuan J H, Li L H, Xu M, Wang J F, Xue K H, Miao X S 2019 Nanoscale 11 1131Google Scholar
[29] Xu L C, Du A, Kou L 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 27284Google Scholar
[30] Cadelano E, Palla P L, Giordano S, Colombo L 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235414Google Scholar
[31] Li Y, Yu C, Gan Y, Kong Y, Jiang P, Zou D F, Li P, Yu X F, Wu R, Zhao H, Gao C F, Li J 2019 Nanotechnology. 30 335703Google Scholar
[32] Liu F, Ming P, Li J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 064120Google Scholar
[33] Miao N, Xu B, Bristowe N C, Zhou J, Sun Z 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 11125Google Scholar
[34] Hur T B, Hwang Y H, Kim H K, Lee I J 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 64308Google Scholar
[35] Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72Google Scholar
[36] Yu T, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Bergara A, Lin J, Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Yang G, Liu Y 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 1599Google Scholar
[37] Sarker H P, Rao P M, Huda M N 2019 Chem. Phys. Chem. 20 773Google Scholar
[38] Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 6269Google Scholar
[39] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 205408Google Scholar
[40] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2014 New J. Phys. 16 105007Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5461
- PDF Downloads: 161
- Cited By: 0