-
Based on first-principles calculations, the electronic structure, the transport and optical properties of TiOCl2 monolayer are systematically investigated. The vibrational, thermodynamic, and mechanical properties of TiOCl2 monolayer are studied by phonon spectrum, molecular dynamics and elastic constants calculations. All these results indicate that the TiOCl2 monolayer possesses good structural stability at room temperature and excellent mechanical properties. The electronic structure analysis shows that the TiOCl2 is an indirect band gap (1.92 eV) semiconductor. Its band structure can be significantly affected by in-plane stress. Specifically, the TiOCl2 monolayer undergoes an indirect-to-direct band gap transition under –4% uniaxial stress along the a-axis and the gap size decreases to 1.66 eV. Moreover, the TiOCl2 monolayer exhibits obvious anisotropy characteristics, and its electron mobility is 803 cm2·V–1·s–1 along the b-axis, whereas the hole mobility reaches 2537 cm2·V–1·s–1 along the a-axis. The wave peaks (valleys) of the absorptivity, reflectivity and transmittance shift toward the violet part of the visible band by the stress. All these appealing properties make the TiOCl2 monolayer a promising candidate for applications in optoelectronic devices.
-
Keywords:
- TiOCl2 monolayer /
- first-principles /
- electronic structure /
- optical properties
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666
Google Scholar
[2] Singh E, Singh P, Kim K S, Yeom G Y, Nalwa H S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 11061
Google Scholar
[3] Gong C, Hu K, Wang X, Wangyang P, Yan C, Chu J, Liao M, Dai L, Zhai T, Wang C, Li L, Xiong J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706559
Google Scholar
[4] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699
Google Scholar
[5] An M, Dong S 2020 APL Mater. 8 110704
Google Scholar
[6] Iannaccone G, Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Fiori G 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 183
Google Scholar
[7] Bhimanapati G R, Lin Z, Meunier V, Jung Y, Cha J, Das S, Xiao D, Son Y, Strano M S, Cooper V R, Liang L, Louie S G, Ringe E, Zhou W, Kim S S, Naik R R, Sumpter B G, Terrones H, Xia F, Wang Y, Zhu J, Akinwande D, Alem N, Schuller J A, Schaak R E, Terrones M, Robinson J A 2015 ACS Nano 9 11509
Google Scholar
[8] Xia F, Wang H, Hwang J C M, Neto A H C, Yang L 2019 Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 306
Google Scholar
[9] Mannix A J, Kiraly B, Hersam M C, Guisinger N P 2017 Nat. Rev. Chem. 1 0014
Google Scholar
[10] 徐依全, 王聪 2020 69 184216
Google Scholar
Xu Y Q, Wang C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184216
Google Scholar
[11] Xia F, Mueller T, Lin Y M, Valdes-Garcia A, Avouris P 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 839
Google Scholar
[12] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611
Google Scholar
[13] Bao W, Jing L, Jr J V, Lee Y, Liu G, Tran D, Standley B, Aykol M, Cronin S B, Smirnov D, Koshino M, McCann E, Bockrath M, Lau C N 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 948
Google Scholar
[14] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147
Google Scholar
[15] Fuhrer M S, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 146
Google Scholar
[16] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805
Google Scholar
[17] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G J, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen X H, Zhang Y 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 372
Google Scholar
[18] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X, Tománek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033
Google Scholar
[19] Wood J D, Wells S A, Jariwala D, Chen K S, Cho E, Sangwan V K, Liu X, Lauhon L J, Marks T J, Hersam M C 2014 Nano Lett. 14 6964
Google Scholar
[20] You H P, Ding N, Chen J, Dong S 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 24109
Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[24] Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188
Google Scholar
[25] Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355
Google Scholar
[26] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1
Google Scholar
[27] Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A, Singh A K 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3290
Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Q, Yuan J H, Li L H, Xu M, Wang J F, Xue K H, Miao X S 2019 Nanoscale 11 1131
Google Scholar
[29] Xu L C, Du A, Kou L 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 27284
Google Scholar
[30] Cadelano E, Palla P L, Giordano S, Colombo L 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235414
Google Scholar
[31] Li Y, Yu C, Gan Y, Kong Y, Jiang P, Zou D F, Li P, Yu X F, Wu R, Zhao H, Gao C F, Li J 2019 Nanotechnology. 30 335703
Google Scholar
[32] Liu F, Ming P, Li J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 064120
Google Scholar
[33] Miao N, Xu B, Bristowe N C, Zhou J, Sun Z 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 11125
Google Scholar
[34] Hur T B, Hwang Y H, Kim H K, Lee I J 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 64308
Google Scholar
[35] Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72
Google Scholar
[36] Yu T, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Bergara A, Lin J, Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Yang G, Liu Y 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 1599
Google Scholar
[37] Sarker H P, Rao P M, Huda M N 2019 Chem. Phys. Chem. 20 773
Google Scholar
[38] Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 6269
Google Scholar
[39] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 205408
Google Scholar
[40] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2014 New J. Phys. 16 105007
Google Scholar
-
表 1 沿a方向ε = 0%和ε = –4%时, 单层TiOCl2沿a, b方向的载流子有效质量及迁移率
Table 1. Calculated effective mass and carrier mobility for TiOCl2 monolayer under different uniaxial strain.
strain carrier ma/m0 mb/m0 μa
/(cm2·V–1·s–1)μb
/(cm2·V–1·s–1)ε = 0% electron 135.14 0.89 0.11 157.32 hole 1.33 2.14 347.72 113.97 ε = –4% electron 11.14 0.69 5.45 802.71 hole 0.36 1.98 2537.25 246.15 -
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666
Google Scholar
[2] Singh E, Singh P, Kim K S, Yeom G Y, Nalwa H S 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 11061
Google Scholar
[3] Gong C, Hu K, Wang X, Wangyang P, Yan C, Chu J, Liao M, Dai L, Zhai T, Wang C, Li L, Xiong J 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1706559
Google Scholar
[4] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N, Strano M S 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 699
Google Scholar
[5] An M, Dong S 2020 APL Mater. 8 110704
Google Scholar
[6] Iannaccone G, Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Fiori G 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 183
Google Scholar
[7] Bhimanapati G R, Lin Z, Meunier V, Jung Y, Cha J, Das S, Xiao D, Son Y, Strano M S, Cooper V R, Liang L, Louie S G, Ringe E, Zhou W, Kim S S, Naik R R, Sumpter B G, Terrones H, Xia F, Wang Y, Zhu J, Akinwande D, Alem N, Schuller J A, Schaak R E, Terrones M, Robinson J A 2015 ACS Nano 9 11509
Google Scholar
[8] Xia F, Wang H, Hwang J C M, Neto A H C, Yang L 2019 Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 306
Google Scholar
[9] Mannix A J, Kiraly B, Hersam M C, Guisinger N P 2017 Nat. Rev. Chem. 1 0014
Google Scholar
[10] 徐依全, 王聪 2020 69 184216
Google Scholar
Xu Y Q, Wang C 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 184216
Google Scholar
[11] Xia F, Mueller T, Lin Y M, Valdes-Garcia A, Avouris P 2009 Nat. Nanotechnol. 4 839
Google Scholar
[12] Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 611
Google Scholar
[13] Bao W, Jing L, Jr J V, Lee Y, Liu G, Tran D, Standley B, Aykol M, Cronin S B, Smirnov D, Koshino M, McCann E, Bockrath M, Lau C N 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 948
Google Scholar
[14] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147
Google Scholar
[15] Fuhrer M S, Hone J 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 146
Google Scholar
[16] Mak K F, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz T F 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 136805
Google Scholar
[17] Li L, Yu Y, Ye G J, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen X H, Zhang Y 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 372
Google Scholar
[18] Liu H, Neal A T, Zhu Z, Luo Z, Xu X, Tománek D, Ye P D 2014 ACS Nano 8 4033
Google Scholar
[19] Wood J D, Wells S A, Jariwala D, Chen K S, Cho E, Sangwan V K, Liu X, Lauhon L J, Marks T J, Hersam M C 2014 Nano Lett. 14 6964
Google Scholar
[20] You H P, Ding N, Chen J, Dong S 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 24109
Google Scholar
[21] Kresse G, Hafner J 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 558
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmuller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[23] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
Google Scholar
[24] Monkhorst H J, Pack J D 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 5188
Google Scholar
[25] Gonze X, Lee C 1997 Phys. Rev. B 55 10355
Google Scholar
[26] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1
Google Scholar
[27] Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A, Singh A K 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3290
Google Scholar
[28] Song Y Q, Yuan J H, Li L H, Xu M, Wang J F, Xue K H, Miao X S 2019 Nanoscale 11 1131
Google Scholar
[29] Xu L C, Du A, Kou L 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 27284
Google Scholar
[30] Cadelano E, Palla P L, Giordano S, Colombo L 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 235414
Google Scholar
[31] Li Y, Yu C, Gan Y, Kong Y, Jiang P, Zou D F, Li P, Yu X F, Wu R, Zhao H, Gao C F, Li J 2019 Nanotechnology. 30 335703
Google Scholar
[32] Liu F, Ming P, Li J 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 064120
Google Scholar
[33] Miao N, Xu B, Bristowe N C, Zhou J, Sun Z 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 11125
Google Scholar
[34] Hur T B, Hwang Y H, Kim H K, Lee I J 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 64308
Google Scholar
[35] Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72
Google Scholar
[36] Yu T, Zhao Z, Sun Y, Bergara A, Lin J, Zhang S, Xu H, Zhang L, Yang G, Liu Y 2019 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 1599
Google Scholar
[37] Sarker H P, Rao P M, Huda M N 2019 Chem. Phys. Chem. 20 773
Google Scholar
[38] Cai Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y W 2014 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 6269
Google Scholar
[39] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 205408
Google Scholar
[40] Matthes L, Pulci O, Bechstedt F 2014 New J. Phys. 16 105007
Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6176
- PDF Downloads: 172
- Cited By: 0