-
The JA-SW hybrid model is extended in order to include the strain or stress anisotropy. With this improved model, a simulation is carried out to study the effects of stress on magnetic hysteresis loss and coercivity of ferromagnetic film. It is shown that the hysteresis loss and coercivity are related to the external field orientation, the stress intensity and the stress direction. Hysteresis loss, or the coercive force does not entirely monotonially increase with the change of stress intensity. For example, when the external field is parallel to the easy axis, a valley appears in the curve. In addition, stress will cause the peak offset of the coercivity curve as the orientation angle of the external field changes. Extensive comparisons of results with literature data are made and the differences between them are explained.
-
Keywords:
- improved JA-SW model /
- hysteresis loss /
- coercivity /
- stress
[1] Ohnuma M, Yanai T, Hono K, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y, Herzer G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 093927
[2] Zhang H, Zeng D C, Liu Z W 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 067503 (in Chinese) [张辉, 曾德长, 刘仲武 2011 60 067503]
[3] Qian L J, Xu X Y, Hu J G 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 2589
[4] Rong J H, Yun G H 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 5483 (in Chinese) [荣建红, 云国宏 2007 56 5483]
[5] Pan J, Zhou L, Tao Y C, Hu J G 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 3521 (in Chinese) [潘靖, 周岚, 陶永春, 胡经国 2007 56 3521]
[6] Garcia D, Munoz J L, Castano F J, Prados C, Asenjo A, Garcia J M, Vazquez M 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 4809
[7] Mandal K, Vazquez M 2000 IEEE Trans. Magn. 36 2912
[8] Stobiecki T, Wrona J, Czapkiewicz M 2000 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215-216 566
[9] Minor M K, Crawford T M, Klemmer T J, Peng Y G, Laughlin D E 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 91 8453
[10] Callegaro L, Puppin E 1997 IEEE Trans. Magn. 33 1007
[11] Jiles D C, Atherton D L 1984 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 17 1265
[12] Garikepati P , Chang T T, Jiles D C 1988 IEEE Trans. Magn. 24 2922
[13] Sablik M J, Kwun H, Burkhardt G L, Jiles D C 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 61 3799
[14] Sablik M J, Jiles D C 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 5402
[15] Sablik M J, Jiles D C 1993 IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 2113
[16] Jiles D C 1995 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28 1537
[17] Jiles D C, Devine M K 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76 7015
[18] LO C C H, Kinser E, Jiles D C 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 6626
[19] Zou P, Yu W, Bain A A 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn.38 3501
[20] Braun A 2006 Physica B 373 346
[21] Zhu B, LO C C H, Lee S J, Jiles D C 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7009
[22] Hu R L, Soh A K, Zheng G P, Ni Yong 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 301 458
[23] Shu Y C, Lin M P, Wu K C 2004 Mech. Mater 36 975
[24] Kedous-Lebouc A, Vernescu C, Cornut B 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 254-255 321
[25] Stoner E C, Wohlfarth E P 1948 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 240 74
[26] Dimitropoulos P D, Stamoulis G I, Hristoforou E 2006 IEEE Sens. J. 6 721
[27] Guo Z Z 2011 Solid State Commun. 151 116
[28] Braun D 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 261 295
[29] Yamamoto K, Yanase S 2011 Przegl Elektrotechniczny 87 97
[30] Yamamoto K, Nakano H, Yamashiro Y 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 254-255 222
[31] Pan J, Tao Y C, Hu J G 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 3032 (in Chinese) [潘靖, 陶永春, 胡经国 2006 55 3032]
[32] Bai Y H, Yun G H, Narisu 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 4962 (in Chinese) [白宇浩, 云国宏, 那日苏 2009 58 4962]
[33] Thang P D, Rijnders G, Blank D H A 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310 2621
-
[1] Ohnuma M, Yanai T, Hono K, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y, Herzer G 2010 J. Appl. Phys. 108 093927
[2] Zhang H, Zeng D C, Liu Z W 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 067503 (in Chinese) [张辉, 曾德长, 刘仲武 2011 60 067503]
[3] Qian L J, Xu X Y, Hu J G 2009 Chin. Phys. B 18 2589
[4] Rong J H, Yun G H 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 5483 (in Chinese) [荣建红, 云国宏 2007 56 5483]
[5] Pan J, Zhou L, Tao Y C, Hu J G 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 3521 (in Chinese) [潘靖, 周岚, 陶永春, 胡经国 2007 56 3521]
[6] Garcia D, Munoz J L, Castano F J, Prados C, Asenjo A, Garcia J M, Vazquez M 1999 J. Appl. Phys. 85 4809
[7] Mandal K, Vazquez M 2000 IEEE Trans. Magn. 36 2912
[8] Stobiecki T, Wrona J, Czapkiewicz M 2000 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215-216 566
[9] Minor M K, Crawford T M, Klemmer T J, Peng Y G, Laughlin D E 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 91 8453
[10] Callegaro L, Puppin E 1997 IEEE Trans. Magn. 33 1007
[11] Jiles D C, Atherton D L 1984 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 17 1265
[12] Garikepati P , Chang T T, Jiles D C 1988 IEEE Trans. Magn. 24 2922
[13] Sablik M J, Kwun H, Burkhardt G L, Jiles D C 1987 J. Appl. Phys. 61 3799
[14] Sablik M J, Jiles D C 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 5402
[15] Sablik M J, Jiles D C 1993 IEEE Trans. Magn. 29 2113
[16] Jiles D C 1995 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28 1537
[17] Jiles D C, Devine M K 1994 J. Appl. Phys. 76 7015
[18] LO C C H, Kinser E, Jiles D C 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 6626
[19] Zou P, Yu W, Bain A A 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn.38 3501
[20] Braun A 2006 Physica B 373 346
[21] Zhu B, LO C C H, Lee S J, Jiles D C 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7009
[22] Hu R L, Soh A K, Zheng G P, Ni Yong 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 301 458
[23] Shu Y C, Lin M P, Wu K C 2004 Mech. Mater 36 975
[24] Kedous-Lebouc A, Vernescu C, Cornut B 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 254-255 321
[25] Stoner E C, Wohlfarth E P 1948 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 240 74
[26] Dimitropoulos P D, Stamoulis G I, Hristoforou E 2006 IEEE Sens. J. 6 721
[27] Guo Z Z 2011 Solid State Commun. 151 116
[28] Braun D 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 261 295
[29] Yamamoto K, Yanase S 2011 Przegl Elektrotechniczny 87 97
[30] Yamamoto K, Nakano H, Yamashiro Y 2003 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 254-255 222
[31] Pan J, Tao Y C, Hu J G 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 3032 (in Chinese) [潘靖, 陶永春, 胡经国 2006 55 3032]
[32] Bai Y H, Yun G H, Narisu 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 4962 (in Chinese) [白宇浩, 云国宏, 那日苏 2009 58 4962]
[33] Thang P D, Rijnders G, Blank D H A 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310 2621
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8884
- PDF Downloads: 1475
- Cited By: 0