SrRuO<sub>3</sub>超薄膜制备条件和拓扑霍尔效应的关联

张静娴; 保明睿; 叶飞; 刘佳; 成龙; 翟晓芳

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20221854

摘要

使用激光分子束外延在SrTiO₃(001)衬底上生长SrRuO₃薄膜, 并研究激光能量密度、生长温度和靶材表面烧蚀度等生长参数对于SrRuO₃表面形貌、基本磁电性质以及拓扑霍尔效应的影响. 当在最优条件下生长SrRuO₃薄膜时, 样品表面平整、台阶清晰, 具有最低的金属-绝缘体转变温度, 电阻率最低, 且具有最显著的拓扑霍尔效应; 而改变生长参数生长的SrRuO₃薄膜由于存在更多的缺陷, 其表面较粗糙, 金属-绝缘体转变温度增大, 或表现出绝缘体行为, 而拓扑霍尔效应会变弱甚至消失.

关键词:

Abstract

As one of the magnetic transition metal oxides, SrRuO₃ (SRO) has received much attention in recent years, which is mainly due to its unique itinerate ferromagnetism and the unusual electrical transport properties–behaving as Fermi liquid at low temperature and bad metal at high temperature. In the growth of SRO thin films, there are many factors that can affect the quality of thin films. In this work, we study various factors affecting the growth and quality of SRO thin films by using laser molecular beam epitaxy (laser MBE), including laser energy density, substrate temperature and target surface conditions, and explore their influences on the topological Hall effect (THE) in SRO. For thin films grown at high laser energy density and high temperature, we found that there are large trenches at the edge of steps, which deteriorate the transport properties of the thin films. When using low laser energy density, extra SrO may exist in the films, which also suppresses the conductivity. Films grown at low temperature tend to have poor crystallinity while films grown at high temperature exhibit island structures. The ablation degree of the target surface increases the decomposition of SRO to SrO, Ru and volatile RuO₄, resulting in Ru defects in the grown thin film. The SRO thin film grown under the optimal conditions (1.75 J·cm^–2, 670 ℃, fresh target surface) exhibits the optimal conductivity and the strongest THE. For non-optimal growth conditions that favors thickness inhomogeneity or Ru defects in the film, THE becomes weaker or even disappears. Therefore, we believe that the THE is due to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) resulting from the interfacial inversion asymmetry and the associated chiral spin structures.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
中国科学技术大学合肥微尺度物质科学国家研究中心, 材料物理与化学系, 合肥　230026

2.
上海科技大学物质学院, 上海　201210

通信作者: 成龙, chenglong1@shanghaitech.edu.cn ; 翟晓芳, zhaixf@shanghaitech.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 52072244, 12104305)、上海市科委(批准号: 21JC1405000)和上海科技大学启动经费资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

2.
School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China

Corresponding author: Cheng Long, chenglong1@shanghaitech.edu.cn ; Zhai Xiao-Fang, zhaixf@shanghaitech.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52072244, 12104305), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (Grant No. 21JC1405000), and the ShanghaiTech Startup Fund, China.

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Randall J J, Ward R 1959 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81 2629 Google Scholar
[2]	Mackenzie A P, Reiner J W, Tyler A W, Galvin L M, Julian S R, Beasley M R, Geballe T H, Kapitulnik A 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R13318 Google Scholar
[3]	Klein L, Dodge J S, Ahn C H, Snyder G J, Geballe T H, Beasley M R, Kapitulnik A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2774 Google Scholar
[4]	Maria J P, Trolier-McKinstry S, Schlom D G, Hawley M E, Brown G W 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 4373 Google Scholar
[5]	Choi K J, Baek S H, Jang H W, Belenky L J, Lyubchenko M, Eom C B 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 759 Google Scholar
[6]	Rijnders G, Blank D H A, Choi J, Eom C B 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 505 Google Scholar
[7]	Choe H C, Kang T S, Je J H, Moon J H, Lee B T, Kim S S 2005 Thin Solid Films 474 44 Google Scholar
[8]	Lee H N, Christen H M, Chisholm M F, Rouleau C M, Lowndes D H 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4107 Google Scholar
[9]	Sun Y, Zhong N, Zhang Y Y, Qi R J, Huang R, Tang X D, Yang P X, Xiang P H, Duan C G 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 235108 Google Scholar
[10]	Toyota D, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 08N505 Google Scholar
[11]	Toyota D, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Takizawa M, Fujimori A, Ono K, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 162508 Google Scholar
[12]	Shen X, Qiu X B, Su D, Zhou S Q, Li A D, Wu D 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 015307 Google Scholar
[13]	Jeong H, Jeong S G, Mohamed A Y, Lee M, Noh W S, Kim Y, Bae J S, Choi W S, Cho D Y 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 092906 Google Scholar
[14]	Chang Y J, Kim C H, Phark S H, Kim Y S, Yu J, Noh T W 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 057201 Google Scholar
[15]	Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Yasuda K, Kagawa F, Koshibae W, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y, Kawasaki M 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1600304 Google Scholar
[16]	Ohuchi Y, Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Kozuka Y, Uchida M, Tokura Y, Kawasaki M 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 213 Google Scholar
[17]	Wang L F, Feng Q Y, Kim Y, Kim R, Lee K H, Pollard S D, Shin Y J, Zhou H B, Peng W, Lee D, Meng W J, Yang H, Han J H, Kim M, Lu Q Y, Noh T W 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 1087 Google Scholar
[18]	Gu Y D, Wei Y W, Xu K, Zhang H R, Wan F, Li F, Saleem M S, Chang C Z, Sun J R, Song C, Feng J, Zhong X Y, Liu W, Zhang Z D, Zhu J, Pan F 2019 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 52 404001 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang W B, Daniels M W, Liao Z L, Zhao Y F, Wang J, Koster G, Rijnders G, Chang C Z, Xiao D, Wu W D 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1054 Google Scholar
[20]	Matl P, Ong N P, Yan Y F, Li Y Q, Studebaker D, Baum T, Doubinina G 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 10248 Google Scholar
[21]	Wang L, Feng Q, Lee H G, Ko E K, Lu Q, Noh T W 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2468 Google Scholar
[22]	Kimbell G, Sass P M, Woltjes B, Ko E K, Noh T W, Wu W, Robinson J W A 2020 Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 054414 Google Scholar
[23]	Lee S A, Oh S, Lee J, Hwang J Y, Kim J, Park S, Bae J S, Hong T E, Lee S, Kim S W, Kang W N, Choi W S 2017 Sci. Rep 7 11583 Google Scholar
[24]	Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Yamamoto T, Meguro S, Koinuma H 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 241919 Google Scholar
[25]	Keeble D J, Wicklein S, Dittmann R, Ravelli L, Mackie R A, Egger W 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 226102 Google Scholar
[26]	Ohnishi T, Takada K 2011 Appl. Phys. Express 4 025501 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhang J, Cheng L, Cao H, Bao M, Zhao J, Liu X, Zhao A, Choi Y, Zhou H, Shafer P, Zhai X 2022 Nano Res. 15 7584 Google Scholar
[28]	Zakharov N D, Satyalakshmi K M, Koren G, Hesse D 1999 J. Mater. Res. 14 4385 Google Scholar
[29]	Koster G, Klein L, Siemons W, Rijnders G, Dodge J S, Eom C B, Blank D H A, Beasley M R 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 253 Google Scholar
[30]	Kaur P, Sharma K K, Pandit R, Choudhary R J, Kumar R 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 081608 Google Scholar
[31]	Jia Q X, Chu F, Adams C D, Wu X D, Hawley M, Cho J H, Findikoglu A T, Foltyn S R, Smith J L, Mitchell T E 1996 J. Mater. Res. 11 2263 Google Scholar
[32]	Jia Q X, Foltyn S R, Hawley M, Wu X D 1997 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15 1080
[33]	Shin J, Kalinin S V, Lee H N, Christen H M, Moore R G, Plummer E W, Baddorf A P 2005 Surf Sci. 581 118 Google Scholar
[34]	Sohn B, Kim B, Choi J W, Chang S H, Han J H, Kim C 2020 Curr. Appl. Phys. 20 186 Google Scholar
[35]	Kim G, Son K, Suyolcu Y E, Miao L, Schreiber N J, Nair H P, Putzky D, Minola M, Christiani G, van Aken P A, Shen K M, Schlom D G, Logvenov G, Keimer B 2020 Phys. Rev. Materials 4 104410 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 不同激光能量密度下生长的SRO薄膜表面形貌AFM图及电学性质和结构表征　(a)—(e)激光能量密度分别为1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2和2.25 J/cm²时样品AFM图, 测试区域为2 μm × 2 μm, 薄膜厚度均为6个单胞; (f) 不同激光能量密度生长的薄膜电阻率随温度的变化, 其中1.25和2.25 J/cm²样品数据绘制在右坐标轴中; (g) 不同激光能量密度生长的薄膜的XRD图, 虚线为面外晶格常数c最小时SRO(002)峰位置

Fig. 1. AFM images and resistivity of 6-unit-cell SRO thin films grown using different laser fluence: (a)–(e) AFM images of SRO thin film grown under 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 and 2.25 J/cm², the size is 2 μm× 2 μm, the film thickness is 6 unit cells. (f) Resistivity of each thin film as a function of temperature. (g) XRD patterns for SRO films deposited under various laser fluence, the dashed line indicates the SRO (002) peak position when the out-of-plane lattice constant c reaches the minimum.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同生长温度下生长的SRO薄膜表面形貌AFM图及电学性质表征　(a)—(d)生长温度分别为630, 670, 700和730 ℃下生长的薄膜表面AFM图, 区域为2 μm × 2 μm, 薄膜厚度均为6个单胞; (e)不同生长温度下生长的薄膜的电阻率随温度变化关系图; (f)不同生长温度下生长的薄膜其XRD图, 虚线为面外晶格常数c最小时SRO(002)峰位置

Fig. 2. AFM images and resistivity of 6-unit-cell SRO thin films grown using different deposition temperature: (a)–(d) AFM images of SRO thin film grown at 630, 670, 700 and 730 ℃, the size is 2 μm × 2 μm, the film thickness is 6 unit cells. (e) Resistivity of each thin film as a function of temperature. (f) XRD patterns for SRO films deposited under various deposition temperature, the dashed line indicates the SRO (002) peak position when the out-of-plane lattice constant c reaches the minimum.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 靶材表面经过不同激光脉冲数烧蚀后生长的SRO薄膜表面形貌和电学性质表征以及靶面SEM对比图　(a)—(d)磨靶后最初始生长及靶材分别经过3 × 10⁴ P和2 × 10⁵ P溅射后生长的薄膜电阻率随温度变化图(a)及表面形貌图(b)—(d), 厚度均为6个单胞, AFM测试区域为2 μm × 2 μm; (e)—(h)新鲜靶材和靶面经过2 × 10⁵ P溅射后生长的薄膜电阻率随温度变化图(e)、表面形貌图(f), (g)和XRD图(h), AFM测试区域为1 μm × 1 μm, (h)中*为衬底STO(002)峰, ♦为SRO(002)峰, 薄膜厚度为30个单胞; (i), (j)未经激光烧蚀与经过2 × 10⁵ P溅射后的SRO靶材表面SEM成像及EDS图; (k) 新鲜靶材、经过1 × 10⁴ P溅射后的靶面的XRD图以及SRO(蓝色)和Ru(绿色)的XRD标准卡片

Fig. 3. AFM images and resistivity of SRO thin films grown after the target surface is ablated by different laser pulse numbers and SEM images of the target surface before and after laser ablation: (a)–(d) Resistivity and AFM images of the 6-unit-cell SRO thin films grown using fresh target and after the target is ablated by 3 × 10⁴ P and 2 × 10⁵ P, respectively. (e)–(h) Resistivity, AFM images and XRD patterns of the 30-unit-cell SRO thin films grown using fresh target and after the target is ablated by 2 × 10⁵ P, respectively. * denotes the (002) peak of STO while ♦ denotes the (002) peak of SRO in (h). (i), (j) SEM and EDS image of SRO target surface before and after 2 × 10⁵ P laser ablation; (k) XRD patterns for the fresh target, the ablated target with 2 × 10⁵ P, and the standard cards of SRO (blue) and Ru (green), respectively.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同条件下生长的SRO薄膜在2 K时的霍尔效应表征　(a)最优生长条件; (b)激光能量密度为2.25 J/cm²; (c)生长温度为730 ℃; (d)靶材表面被预烧蚀3 × 10⁴ P

Fig. 4. Hall resistivity of 6-unit-cell SRO grown under different conditions at 2 K. (a) The optimal growth conditions; (b) the laser fluence is 2.25 J/cm²; (c) the growth temperature is 730 ℃; (d) the target surface is ablated by 3 × 10⁴ P.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

map

[1]	Randall J J, Ward R 1959 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81 2629 Google Scholar
[2]	Mackenzie A P, Reiner J W, Tyler A W, Galvin L M, Julian S R, Beasley M R, Geballe T H, Kapitulnik A 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R13318 Google Scholar
[3]	Klein L, Dodge J S, Ahn C H, Snyder G J, Geballe T H, Beasley M R, Kapitulnik A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 2774 Google Scholar
[4]	Maria J P, Trolier-McKinstry S, Schlom D G, Hawley M E, Brown G W 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 4373 Google Scholar
[5]	Choi K J, Baek S H, Jang H W, Belenky L J, Lyubchenko M, Eom C B 2010 Adv. Mater. 22 759 Google Scholar
[6]	Rijnders G, Blank D H A, Choi J, Eom C B 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 505 Google Scholar
[7]	Choe H C, Kang T S, Je J H, Moon J H, Lee B T, Kim S S 2005 Thin Solid Films 474 44 Google Scholar
[8]	Lee H N, Christen H M, Chisholm M F, Rouleau C M, Lowndes D H 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 4107 Google Scholar
[9]	Sun Y, Zhong N, Zhang Y Y, Qi R J, Huang R, Tang X D, Yang P X, Xiang P H, Duan C G 2016 J. Appl. Phys. 120 235108 Google Scholar
[10]	Toyota D, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 08N505 Google Scholar
[11]	Toyota D, Ohkubo I, Kumigashira H, Oshima M, Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Takizawa M, Fujimori A, Ono K, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 162508 Google Scholar
[12]	Shen X, Qiu X B, Su D, Zhou S Q, Li A D, Wu D 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 015307 Google Scholar
[13]	Jeong H, Jeong S G, Mohamed A Y, Lee M, Noh W S, Kim Y, Bae J S, Choi W S, Cho D Y 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 092906 Google Scholar
[14]	Chang Y J, Kim C H, Phark S H, Kim Y S, Yu J, Noh T W 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 057201 Google Scholar
[15]	Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Yasuda K, Kagawa F, Koshibae W, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y, Kawasaki M 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1600304 Google Scholar
[16]	Ohuchi Y, Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Kozuka Y, Uchida M, Tokura Y, Kawasaki M 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 213 Google Scholar
[17]	Wang L F, Feng Q Y, Kim Y, Kim R, Lee K H, Pollard S D, Shin Y J, Zhou H B, Peng W, Lee D, Meng W J, Yang H, Han J H, Kim M, Lu Q Y, Noh T W 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 1087 Google Scholar
[18]	Gu Y D, Wei Y W, Xu K, Zhang H R, Wan F, Li F, Saleem M S, Chang C Z, Sun J R, Song C, Feng J, Zhong X Y, Liu W, Zhang Z D, Zhu J, Pan F 2019 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 52 404001 Google Scholar
[19]	Wang W B, Daniels M W, Liao Z L, Zhao Y F, Wang J, Koster G, Rijnders G, Chang C Z, Xiao D, Wu W D 2019 Nat. Mater. 18 1054 Google Scholar
[20]	Matl P, Ong N P, Yan Y F, Li Y Q, Studebaker D, Baum T, Doubinina G 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 10248 Google Scholar
[21]	Wang L, Feng Q, Lee H G, Ko E K, Lu Q, Noh T W 2020 Nano Lett. 20 2468 Google Scholar
[22]	Kimbell G, Sass P M, Woltjes B, Ko E K, Noh T W, Wu W, Robinson J W A 2020 Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 054414 Google Scholar
[23]	Lee S A, Oh S, Lee J, Hwang J Y, Kim J, Park S, Bae J S, Hong T E, Lee S, Kim S W, Kang W N, Choi W S 2017 Sci. Rep 7 11583 Google Scholar
[24]	Ohnishi T, Lippmaa M, Yamamoto T, Meguro S, Koinuma H 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 241919 Google Scholar
[25]	Keeble D J, Wicklein S, Dittmann R, Ravelli L, Mackie R A, Egger W 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 226102 Google Scholar
[26]	Ohnishi T, Takada K 2011 Appl. Phys. Express 4 025501 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhang J, Cheng L, Cao H, Bao M, Zhao J, Liu X, Zhao A, Choi Y, Zhou H, Shafer P, Zhai X 2022 Nano Res. 15 7584 Google Scholar
[28]	Zakharov N D, Satyalakshmi K M, Koren G, Hesse D 1999 J. Mater. Res. 14 4385 Google Scholar
[29]	Koster G, Klein L, Siemons W, Rijnders G, Dodge J S, Eom C B, Blank D H A, Beasley M R 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 253 Google Scholar
[30]	Kaur P, Sharma K K, Pandit R, Choudhary R J, Kumar R 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 081608 Google Scholar
[31]	Jia Q X, Chu F, Adams C D, Wu X D, Hawley M, Cho J H, Findikoglu A T, Foltyn S R, Smith J L, Mitchell T E 1996 J. Mater. Res. 11 2263 Google Scholar
[32]	Jia Q X, Foltyn S R, Hawley M, Wu X D 1997 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15 1080
[33]	Shin J, Kalinin S V, Lee H N, Christen H M, Moore R G, Plummer E W, Baddorf A P 2005 Surf Sci. 581 118 Google Scholar
[34]	Sohn B, Kim B, Choi J W, Chang S H, Han J H, Kim C 2020 Curr. Appl. Phys. 20 186 Google Scholar
[35]	Kim G, Son K, Suyolcu Y E, Miao L, Schreiber N J, Nair H P, Putzky D, Minola M, Christiani G, van Aken P A, Shen K M, Schlom D G, Logvenov G, Keimer B 2020 Phys. Rev. Materials 4 104410 Google Scholar

[1]	赵珂楠, 李晟, 芦增星, 劳斌, 郑轩, 李润伟, 汪志明. SrRuO₃薄膜中自旋轨道力矩效率和磁矩翻转的晶向调控. , 2024, 73(11): 117701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240367
[2]	巴佳燕, 陈复洋, 段后建, 邓明勋, 王瑞强. 拓扑材料中的平面霍尔效应. , 2023, 72(20): 207201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230905
[3]	扈仕林, 刘均华, 邓志雄, 肖文, 杨瞻, 陈凯, 廖昭亮. Pt/La_0.67Sr_0.33MnO₃异质结中的反常霍尔效应. , 2023, 72(9): 097503. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221852
[4]	张马淋, 葛剑峰, 段明超, 姚钢, 刘志龙, 管丹丹, 李耀义, 钱冬, 刘灿华, 贾金锋. SrTiO3(001)衬底上多层FeSe薄膜的分子束外延生长. , 2016, 65(12): 127401. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.127401
[5]	易有根, 王瑜英, 胡奇峰, 张彦彬, 彭勇宜, 雷红文, 彭丽萍, 王雪敏, 吴卫东. ZnCdO/ZnO单量子阱结构及其荧光发射特性. , 2016, 65(5): 057802. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.057802
[6]	李文涛, 梁艳, 王炜华, 杨芳, 郭建东. LaTiO3(110)薄膜分子束外延生长的精确控制和表面截止层的研究. , 2015, 64(7): 078103. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.078103
[7]	韦庞, 李康, 冯硝, 欧云波, 张立果, 王立莉, 何珂, 马旭村, 薛其坤. 在预刻蚀的衬底上通过分子束外延直接生长出拓扑绝缘体薄膜的微器件. , 2014, 63(2): 027303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027303
[8]	王萌, 欧云波, 李坊森, 张文号, 汤辰佳, 王立莉, 薛其坤, 马旭村. SrTiO3(001)衬底上单层FeSe超导薄膜的分子束外延生长. , 2014, 63(2): 027401. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027401
[9]	胡懿彬, 郝智彪, 胡健楠, 钮浪, 汪莱, 罗毅. 分子束外延生长InGaN/AlN量子点的组分研究. , 2012, 61(23): 237804. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.237804
[10]	张兵坡, 蔡春锋, 才玺坤, 吴惠桢, 王淼. 分子束外延生长[111]晶向CdTe的研究. , 2012, 61(4): 046802. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.046802
[11]	陈剑辉, 刘保亭, 赵庆勋, 崔永亮, 赵冬月, 郭哲. 含铜铁电电容器SrRuO3/Pb(Zr0.4Ti0.6)O3/SrRuO3/Ni-Al/Cu/Ni-Al/SiO2/Si异质结的研究. , 2011, 60(11): 117701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.117701
[12]	张营堂, 何萌, 陈子瑜, 吕惠宾. 用激光分子束外延在玻璃衬底上生长La0.67Sr0.33MnO3薄膜. , 2009, 58(3): 2002-2004. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2002
[13]	何萌, 刘国珍, 仇杰, 邢杰, 吕惠宾. 用激光分子束外延在Si衬底上外延生长高质量的TiN薄膜. , 2008, 57(2): 1236-1240. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1236
[14]	谭明秋, 陶向明, 何军辉. SrRuO3的电子结构与磁性研究. , 2001, 50(11): 2203-2207. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2203
[15]	崔大复, 陈凡, 赵彤, 师文生, 陈正豪, 周岳亮, 吕惠宾, 杨国桢, 黄惠忠, 张宏霞. 激光分子束外延BaTiO3薄膜最顶层表面原子平面与薄膜生长机理. , 2000, 49(9): 1878-1882. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1878
[16]	牛智川, 周增圻, 吴荣汉, 封松林, R.NOETZEL, U.JAHN, K.H.PLOOG. GaAs均匀点状结构的分子束外延图形生长. , 1998, 47(8): 1346-1353. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1346
[17]	易新建, 李毅, 郝建华, 张新宇, G.K.WONG. 分子束外延生长Sb薄膜及其量子尺寸效应. , 1998, 47(11): 1896-1899. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1896
[18]	茅惠兵, 陆卫, 马朝晖, 刘兴权, 沈学础. GaAs分子束外延生长的Monte Carlo模拟. , 1994, 43(7): 1118-1122. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.1118
[19]	卢励吾, 周洁, 徐俊英, 钟战天. 分子束外延生长AlGaAs/GaAs GRIN-SCH SQW激光器中高温陷阱的研究. , 1993, 42(1): 66-71. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.66
[20]	宗祥福, 邱绍雄, 杨恒青, 黄长河, 陈骏逸, 胡刚, 吴仲墀. GaSb/AlSb/GaAs应变层结构的分子束外延生长. , 1990, 39(12): 1959-1964. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.1959

计量

文章访问数: 4442
PDF下载量: 206
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

SrRuO₃超薄膜制备条件和拓扑霍尔效应的关联