搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

新型二维材料Ti3C2Tx MXene制备及其气敏性能研究

韩丹 刘志华 刘琭琭 韩晓美 刘东明 禚凯 桑胜波

引用本文:
Citation:

新型二维材料Ti3C2Tx MXene制备及其气敏性能研究

韩丹, 刘志华, 刘琭琭, 韩晓美, 刘东明, 禚凯, 桑胜波

Preparation and gas sensing properties of a novel two-dimensional material Ti3C2Tx MXene

Han Dan, Liu Zhi-Hua, Liu Lu-Lu, Han Xiao-Mei, Liu Dong-Ming, Zhuo Kai, Sang Sheng-Bo
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 随着石墨烯材料的发现, 二维材料被人们广泛认识并逐渐应用, 相比于传统二维材料, 二维过渡金属碳化物(MXene)的力学、磁学和电学性能更加优异. 本文分别利用HF溶液和LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀Ti3AlC2获得了Ti3C2Tx样品, 通过电子扫描显微镜(SEM)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)和气敏特性分析, 研究了刻蚀剂对Ti3C2Tx材料结构和气敏性能的影响. 材料结构分析表明: HF和LiF/HCl刻蚀剂均对Ti3C2Tx材料具有良好的刻蚀效果; 气敏性能结果表明: LiF/HCl刻蚀剂制备的Ti3C2Tx的气敏性能优于HF刻蚀剂, 并实现了室温下宽范围、较高灵敏和较高稳定地检测NH3. 分析认为: LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备的Ti3C2Tx材料表面具有较高比例的—O和—OH官能团, 是其高传感性能的主要原因. 本实验研究可为Ti3C2Tx基传感器件的气敏研究和实际应用奠定一定的理论基础.
    Since the discovery of graphene materials, two-dimensional materials have been widely recognized and gradually applied. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides (MXenes) have better mechanical, magnetic and electrical properties than traditional two-dimensional materials. In this work, Ti3C2Tx samples are prepared by etching Ti3AlC2 with different etching agents for the solutions of HF and LiF/HCl. The effects of etching agents on the structure and gas sensing properties of Ti3C2Tx materials are studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and gas sensing properties analysis. The material structure analysis shows that both HF and LiF/HCl etching agents have good etching effect on Ti3C2Tx material. The results of gas sensing properties show that the gas sensing properties of Ti3C2Tx prepared by LiF/HCl etching agent is better than by HF etching agent, and the wide range, high sensitivity and high stability of NH3 detection can be achieved at room temperature. The analysis shows that the high sensing performance of Ti3C2Tx prepared by LiF/HCl solution etching is mainly due to the high proportion of —O and —OH functional groups on the surface of Ti3C2Tx. The experimental studies can lay a theoretical foundation for studying the gas sensing and practical application of Ti3C2Tx based sensor.
      通信作者: 禚凯, zhuokai@tyut.edu.cn ; 桑胜波, sunboa-sang@tyut.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目(批准号: 62031022)和国家自然科学基金(批准号: 51975400, 61971301)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Zhuo Kai, zhuokai@tyut.edu.cn ; Sang Sheng-Bo, sunboa-sang@tyut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.62031022) and the National NaturalScience Foundationof China (Grant Nos. 51975400, 61971301).
    [1]

    Naguib M, Kurtoglu M, Presser V, Lu J, Niu J, Heon M, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum M W 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 4248Google Scholar

    [2]

    Deysher G, Shuck C E, Hantanasirisakul K, Frey N C, Foucher A C, Maleski K, Sarycheva A, Shenoy V B, Stach E A, Anasori B, Gogotsi Y 2020 ACS Nano 14 204Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sokol M, Natu V, Kota S, Barsoum M W 2019 Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 1 210Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tao Q, Lu J, Dahlqvist M, Mockute A, Calder S, Petruhins A, Meshkian R, Rivin O, Potashnikov D, Caspi E a N, Shaked H, Hoser A, Opagiste C, Galera R M, Salikhov R, Wiedwald U, Ritter C, Wildes A R, Johansson B, Hultman L, Farle M, Barsoum M W, Rosen J 2019 Chem. of Mater. 31 2476Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shein I R, Ivanovskii A L 2013 Micro Nano Lett. 8 59Google Scholar

    [6]

    Ding L, Wei Y, Li L, Zhang T, Wang H, Xue J, Ding L X, Wang S, Caro J, Gogotsi Y 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 155Google Scholar

    [7]

    Anasori B, Lukatskaya M R, Gogotsi Y 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 16098Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ding L, Wei Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Caro J, Wang H 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56 1825Google Scholar

    [9]

    Khazaei M, Ranjbar A, Ghorbani Asl M, Arai M, Sasaki T, Liang Y, Yunoki S 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 205125Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yang Z, Jiang L, Wang J, Liu F, He J, Liu A, Lv S, You R, Yan X, Sun P, Wang C, Duan Y, Lu G 2021 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 326 128828Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tai H, Duan Z, He Z, Li X, Xu J, Liu B, Jiang Y 2019 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 298 126874Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu M, He M, Hu Q, Wu Q, Sun G, Xie L, Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Zhou A 2019 ACS Sens. 4 2763Google Scholar

    [13]

    Feng A, Yu Y, Wang Y, Jiang F, Yu Y, Mi L, Song L 2017 Mater. Des. 114 161Google Scholar

    [14]

    Halim J, Lukatskaya M R, Cook K M, Lu J, Smith C R, Naslund L A, May S J, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Eklund P, Barsoum M W 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 2374Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yang S, Zhang P, Wang F, Ricciardulli A G, Lohe M R, Blom P W M, Feng X 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57 15491Google Scholar

    [16]

    黄大朋 2020 博士学位论文 (济南: 山东大学)

    Huang D P 2020 Ph. D. Dissertation(Jinan: Shandong University) (in Chinese)

    [17]

    Lee E, VahidMohammadi A, Prorok B C, Yoon Y S, Beidaghi M, Kim D J 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9 37184Google Scholar

    [18]

    Alhabeb M, Maleski K, Anasori B, Lelyukh P, Clark L, Sin S, Gogotsi Y 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 7633Google Scholar

    [19]

    Cheng Y, Ma Y, Li L, Zhu M, Yue Y, Liu W, Wang L, Jia S, Li C, Qi T, Wang J, Gao Y 2020 ACS Nano 14 2145Google Scholar

    [20]

    Halim J, Cook K M, Naguib M, Eklund P, Gogotsi Y, Rosen J, Barsoum M W 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 362 406Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wu Y, Nie P, Wang J, Dou H, Zhang X 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 39610Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kim S J, Koh H J, Ren C E, Kwon O, Maleski K, Cho S Y, Anasori B, Kim C K, Choi Y K, Kim J, Gogotsi Y, Jung H T 2018 ACS Nano 12 986Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ghidiu M, Halim J, Kota S, Bish D, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum M W 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 3507Google Scholar

    [24]

    Choi Y R, Yoon Y G, Choi K S, Kang J H, Shim Y S, Kim Y H, Chang H J, Lee J H, Park C R, Kim S Y, Jang H W 2015 Carbon 91 178Google Scholar

    [25]

    Geistlinger H 1993 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 17 47Google Scholar

    [26]

    Lu G, Ocola L E, Chen J 2009 Nanotechnology 20 445502Google Scholar

    [27]

    Yu X F, Li Y C, Cheng J B, Liu Z B, Li Q Z, Li W Z, Yang X, Xiao B 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 7 13707Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tang Q, Zhou Z, Shen P 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 16909Google Scholar

    [29]

    Anasori B, Lukatskaya M R, Gogotsi Y 2017 Nature Reviews Materials 2 16098

    [30]

    Xiao B, Li Y C, Yu X F, Cheng J B 2016 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 235 103Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ghosh R, Singh A, Santra S, Ray S K, Chandra A, Guha P K 2014 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 205 67Google Scholar

  • 图 1  MAX相及其对应的MXene结构

    Fig. 1.  MAX phase and its corresponding MXene structure.

    图 2  (a)和(b) HF溶液刻蚀制备Ti3C2Tx材料SEM图像; (c)和(d) LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备Ti3C2Tx材料SEM图像

    Fig. 2.  (a) and (b) SEM images of Ti3C2Tx prepared by HF solution etching; (c) and (d) SEM image of Ti3C2Tx prepared by LiF/HCl solution etching.

    图 3  HF溶液刻蚀制备Ti3C2Tx材料的 (a) XPS光谱图; (b) Ti 2p光谱; (c) C 1s光谱和(d) O 1s光谱; LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备Ti3C2Tx材料的(e) XPS光谱图; (f) Ti 2p光谱; (g) C 1s光谱和(h) O 1s光谱

    Fig. 3.  (a) XPS spectra of Ti3C2Tx prepared by HF solution etching; (b) Ti 2p spectrum; (c) C 1s spectrum and (d) O 1s spectrum; (e) XPS spectra of Ti3C2Tx prepared by LiF/HCl solution etching; (f) Ti 2p spectrum; (g) C 1s spectrum; (h) O 1s spectrum.

    图 4  室温下, (a) HF溶液, (b) LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器对不同浓度NH3的响应度; (c) HF溶液, (d) LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备的Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器的响应度随NH3浓度变化的朗缪尔等温线

    Fig. 4.  Response of Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor prepared by etching: (a) HF solution and (b) LiF/HCl solution to NH3 with different concentrations at room temperature; Langmuir isotherm of the responsivity of Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor prepared by the etching of (c) HF solution and (d) LiF/HCl solution.

    图 5  室温下, (a) HF溶液刻蚀制备和(b) LiF/HCl溶液刻蚀制备的Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器对10 ppm NH3的重复性; (c)室温下, 两种刻蚀剂刻蚀制备的Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器对10 ppm NH3 的稳定性; (d)室温下, 两种刻蚀剂刻蚀制备的Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器对不同气体的响应度

    Fig. 5.  At room temperature, (a) Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor prepared by etching HF solution and (b) Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor prepared by etching LiF/HCl solution was repeatable to 10 ppm NH3. (c) at room temperature, the stability of Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor prepared by two etching agents for 10 ppm NH3; (d) response of Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor etched by two etching agents to different gases at room temperature.

    图 6  气体分子吸附在不同端接官能团Ti3C2Tx上的密度泛函理论模拟结果 (a) Ti3C2(OH)2, (b) Ti3C2O2和(c) Ti3C2F2上NH3最小能量配置的侧面和顶部视图(1 Å = 0.1 nm)

    Fig. 6.  DFT simulation results of gas molecules adsorbed on different terminated functional groups Ti3C2Tx. Side and top views of the minimum energy configuration for NH3 on (a) Ti3C2(OH)2, (b) Ti3C2O2 and (c) Ti3C2F2 (1 Å = 0.1 nm).

    图 7  Ti3C2Tx基气体传感器对NH3的传感机理

    Fig. 7.  Sensing mechanism of NH3 by Ti3C2Tx based gas sensor.

    表 1  两种不同刻蚀剂制备获得的Ti3C2Tx材料比表面积

    Table 1.  Specific surface area of Ti3C2Tx prepared by two different etchers.

    样品刻蚀剂比表面积/(m2·g–1)
    Ti3C2TxHF溶液5.265
    Ti3C2TxLiF/HCl溶液5.263
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  图4(c)图4(d)朗缪尔等温线系数

    Table 2.  Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) Langmuir isotherm coefficients.

    刻蚀剂LiF/HClHF
    工作温度室温室温
    a38.9440514.41327
    b0.062460.3099
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Naguib M, Kurtoglu M, Presser V, Lu J, Niu J, Heon M, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum M W 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 4248Google Scholar

    [2]

    Deysher G, Shuck C E, Hantanasirisakul K, Frey N C, Foucher A C, Maleski K, Sarycheva A, Shenoy V B, Stach E A, Anasori B, Gogotsi Y 2020 ACS Nano 14 204Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sokol M, Natu V, Kota S, Barsoum M W 2019 Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 1 210Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tao Q, Lu J, Dahlqvist M, Mockute A, Calder S, Petruhins A, Meshkian R, Rivin O, Potashnikov D, Caspi E a N, Shaked H, Hoser A, Opagiste C, Galera R M, Salikhov R, Wiedwald U, Ritter C, Wildes A R, Johansson B, Hultman L, Farle M, Barsoum M W, Rosen J 2019 Chem. of Mater. 31 2476Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shein I R, Ivanovskii A L 2013 Micro Nano Lett. 8 59Google Scholar

    [6]

    Ding L, Wei Y, Li L, Zhang T, Wang H, Xue J, Ding L X, Wang S, Caro J, Gogotsi Y 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 155Google Scholar

    [7]

    Anasori B, Lukatskaya M R, Gogotsi Y 2017 Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 16098Google Scholar

    [8]

    Ding L, Wei Y, Wang Y, Chen H, Caro J, Wang H 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56 1825Google Scholar

    [9]

    Khazaei M, Ranjbar A, Ghorbani Asl M, Arai M, Sasaki T, Liang Y, Yunoki S 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 205125Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yang Z, Jiang L, Wang J, Liu F, He J, Liu A, Lv S, You R, Yan X, Sun P, Wang C, Duan Y, Lu G 2021 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 326 128828Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tai H, Duan Z, He Z, Li X, Xu J, Liu B, Jiang Y 2019 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 298 126874Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu M, He M, Hu Q, Wu Q, Sun G, Xie L, Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Zhou A 2019 ACS Sens. 4 2763Google Scholar

    [13]

    Feng A, Yu Y, Wang Y, Jiang F, Yu Y, Mi L, Song L 2017 Mater. Des. 114 161Google Scholar

    [14]

    Halim J, Lukatskaya M R, Cook K M, Lu J, Smith C R, Naslund L A, May S J, Hultman L, Gogotsi Y, Eklund P, Barsoum M W 2014 Chem. Mater. 26 2374Google Scholar

    [15]

    Yang S, Zhang P, Wang F, Ricciardulli A G, Lohe M R, Blom P W M, Feng X 2018 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 57 15491Google Scholar

    [16]

    黄大朋 2020 博士学位论文 (济南: 山东大学)

    Huang D P 2020 Ph. D. Dissertation(Jinan: Shandong University) (in Chinese)

    [17]

    Lee E, VahidMohammadi A, Prorok B C, Yoon Y S, Beidaghi M, Kim D J 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9 37184Google Scholar

    [18]

    Alhabeb M, Maleski K, Anasori B, Lelyukh P, Clark L, Sin S, Gogotsi Y 2017 Chem. Mater. 29 7633Google Scholar

    [19]

    Cheng Y, Ma Y, Li L, Zhu M, Yue Y, Liu W, Wang L, Jia S, Li C, Qi T, Wang J, Gao Y 2020 ACS Nano 14 2145Google Scholar

    [20]

    Halim J, Cook K M, Naguib M, Eklund P, Gogotsi Y, Rosen J, Barsoum M W 2016 Appl. Surf. Sci. 362 406Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wu Y, Nie P, Wang J, Dou H, Zhang X 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 39610Google Scholar

    [22]

    Kim S J, Koh H J, Ren C E, Kwon O, Maleski K, Cho S Y, Anasori B, Kim C K, Choi Y K, Kim J, Gogotsi Y, Jung H T 2018 ACS Nano 12 986Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ghidiu M, Halim J, Kota S, Bish D, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum M W 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 3507Google Scholar

    [24]

    Choi Y R, Yoon Y G, Choi K S, Kang J H, Shim Y S, Kim Y H, Chang H J, Lee J H, Park C R, Kim S Y, Jang H W 2015 Carbon 91 178Google Scholar

    [25]

    Geistlinger H 1993 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 17 47Google Scholar

    [26]

    Lu G, Ocola L E, Chen J 2009 Nanotechnology 20 445502Google Scholar

    [27]

    Yu X F, Li Y C, Cheng J B, Liu Z B, Li Q Z, Li W Z, Yang X, Xiao B 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 7 13707Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tang Q, Zhou Z, Shen P 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 16909Google Scholar

    [29]

    Anasori B, Lukatskaya M R, Gogotsi Y 2017 Nature Reviews Materials 2 16098

    [30]

    Xiao B, Li Y C, Yu X F, Cheng J B 2016 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 235 103Google Scholar

    [31]

    Ghosh R, Singh A, Santra S, Ray S K, Chandra A, Guha P K 2014 Sens. Actuators B Chem. 205 67Google Scholar

  • [1] 李欣悦, 高国翔, 高强, 刘春生, 叶小娟. 二维BeB2作为镁离子电池阳极材料的理论研究.  , 2024, 73(11): 118201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240134
    [2] 吴宇阳, 李卫, 任青颖, 李金泽, 许巍, 许杰. 金属Sc修饰Ti2CO2吸附气体分子的第一性原理研究.  , 2024, 73(7): 073101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231432
    [3] 毕文杰, 杨爽, 周静, 金伟, 陈文. Cu3Mo2O9/MoO3纳米复合材料制备及三甲胺气敏性能研究.  , 2023, 72(16): 168103. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230720
    [4] 董逸蒙, 孙永娇, 侯煜晨, 王炳亮, 陆志远, 张文栋, 胡杰. SnO2/ZnS异质结气体传感器的制备及其室温NO2敏感特性.  , 2023, 72(16): 160701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230735
    [5] 杜立杰, 陈靖雯, 王荣明. 基于C14H31O3P-Ti3C2/Au肖特基结的自驱动近红外探测器.  , 2023, 72(13): 138502. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230480
    [6] 肖忆瑶, 何佳豪, 陈南锟, 王超, 宋宁宁. 基于负载Fe3O4纳米微球的大尺寸单层二维Ti3C2Tx微波吸收性能.  , 2023, 72(21): 217501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231200
    [7] 姜楠, 李奥林, 蘧水仙, 勾思, 欧阳方平. 应变诱导单层NbSi2N4材料磁转变的第一性原理研究.  , 2022, 71(20): 206303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220939
    [8] 宋蕊, 王必利, 冯凯, 王黎, 梁丹丹. 二维VOBr2单层的结构畸变及其磁性和铁电性.  , 2022, 71(3): 037101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211516
    [9] 宋蕊. 二维VOBr2单层的结构畸变及其磁性和铁电性研究.  , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211516
    [10] 陈旭凡, 杨强, 胡小会. 过渡金属原子掺杂对二维CrBr3电磁学性能的调控.  , 2021, 70(24): 247401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210936
    [11] 雷挺, 吕伟明, 吕文星, 崔博垚, 胡瑞, 时文华, 曾中明. 光栅局域调控二维光电探测器.  , 2021, 70(2): 027801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201325
    [12] 罗实, 魏大鹏, 魏大程. 二维材料在生物传感器中的应用.  , 2021, 70(6): 064701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201613
    [13] 白亮, 赵启旭, 沈健伟, 杨岩, 袁清红, 钟成, 孙海涛, 孙真荣. 基于MXene涂层保护Cs3Sb异质结光阴极材料的计算筛选.  , 2021, 70(21): 218504. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210956
    [14] 徐强, 段康, 谢浩, 张秦蓉, 梁本权, 彭祯凯, 李卫. 基于第一性原理的二维材料黑磷砷气体传感器的机理研究.  , 2021, 70(15): 157101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201952
    [15] 韩丹, 刘志华, 刘琭琭, 韩晓美, 刘东明, 禚凯, 桑胜波. 新型二维材料Ti3C2Tx MXene制备及其气敏性能研究.  , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211048
    [16] 龙慧, 胡建伟, 吴福根, 董华锋. 基于二维材料异质结可饱和吸收体的超快激光器.  , 2020, 69(18): 188102. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201235
    [17] 魏钟鸣, 夏建白. 低维半导体偏振光探测器研究进展.  , 2019, 68(16): 163201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191002
    [18] 王聪, 刘杰, 张晗. 基于二维纳米材料的超快脉冲激光器.  , 2019, 68(18): 188101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190751
    [19] 艾雯, 胡小会, 潘林, 陈长春, 王一峰, 沈晓冬. 二维材料WTe2用于气体传感器的性能研究.  , 2019, 68(19): 197101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190642
    [20] 陈义豪, 徐威, 王钰琪, 万相, 李岳峰, 梁定康, 陆立群, 刘鑫伟, 连晓娟, 胡二涛, 郭宇锋, 许剑光, 童祎, 肖建. 基于二维材料MXene的仿神经突触忆阻器的制备和长/短时程突触可塑性的实现.  , 2019, 68(9): 098501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182306
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11470
  • PDF下载量:  309
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-06-02
  • 修回日期:  2021-09-05
  • 上网日期:  2021-10-18
  • 刊出日期:  2022-01-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map