多个量子节点确定性纠缠的建立

刘艳红; 吴量; 闫智辉; 贾晓军; 彭堃墀

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20181614

摘要

量子纠缠是一种重要的量子资源, 在多个空间分离的量子存储器间建立确定性的量子纠缠, 然后在用户控制的时刻将所存储的量子纠缠转移到量子信道中进行信息的分发和传送, 这对于实现量子信息网络是至关重要的. 本文介绍了用光学参量放大器制备与铷原子D1吸收线对应的非经典光场, 而且在三个空间分离的原子系综中确定性量子纠缠的产生、存储和转移. 利用电磁感应透明光和原子相互作用的原理, 将制备的多组分光场纠缠态模式映射到三个远距离的原子系综以建立原子自旋波之间的纠缠. 然后, 存储在原子系综中的纠缠态通过三个量子通道, 纠缠态的量子噪声被转移到三束空间分离的正交纠缠光场. 三束释放的光场间纠缠的存在验证了该系统具有保持多组分纠缠的能力. 这个方案实现了三个量子节点间的纠缠, 并且可以直接扩展到具有更多节点的量子网络, 为未来实现大型量子网络通信奠定了基础.

关键词:

Abstract

Quantum entanglement is a significant quantum resource, which plays a central role in quantum communication. For realizing quantum information network, it is important to establish deterministic quantum entanglement among multiple spatial-separated quantum memories, and then the stored entanglement is transferred into the quantum channels for distributing and transmitting the quantum information at the user-control time. Firstly, we introduce the scheme of deterministic generation polarization squeezed state at 795 nm. A pair of quadrature amplitude squeezed optical fields are prepared by two degenerate optical parameter amplifiers pumped by a laser at 398 nm, and then the polarization squeezed state of light appears by combining the generated two quadrature amplitude squeezed optical beams on a polarizing beam splitter. Secondly, we present the experimental demonstration of tripartite polarization entanglement described by Stokes operators of optical field. The quadrature tripartite entangled states of light corresponding to the resonance with D1 line of rubidium atoms are transformed into the continuous-variable polarization entanglement via polarization beam splitter with three bright local optical beams. Finally, we propose the generation, storage and transfer of deterministic quantum entanglement among three spatially separated atomic ensembles. By the method of electromagnetically induced transparency light-matter interaction, the optical multiple entangled state is mapped into three distant atomic ensembles to build the entanglement among three atomic spin waves. Then, the quantum noise of entanglement stored in the atomic ensembles is transferred to the three space-seperated quadrature entangled light fields through three quantum channels. The existence of entanglement among the three released beams verifies that the system has the ability to maintain the multipartite entanglement. This protocol realizes the entanglement among three distant quantum nodes, and it can be extended to quantum network with more quantum nodes. All of these lay the foundation for realizing the large-scale quantum network communication in the future.

Keywords:

deterministic quantum entanglement /
electromagnetically induced transparency /
multipartite entanglement /
quantum nodes

作者及机构信息

1.
山西大学光电研究所, 量子光学与光量子器件国家重点实验室, 太原　030006

2.
山西大学, 极端光学协同创新中心, 太原　030006

通信作者: 贾晓军, jiaxj@sxu.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2016YFA0301402)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 61775127, 11474190, 11654002)、山西青年三晋学者项目、山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目和山西省“1331工程”重点学科建设计划资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Institute of Opto-Electronics, State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

2.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Corresponding author: Jia Xiao-Jun, jiaxj@sxu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0301402), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61775127, 11474190, 11654002), the Program for Sanjin Scholars of Shanxi Province, China, the Shanxi Scholarship Council of China, and the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” Key Subjects Construction, China.

文章全文

参考文献

[1]	Pan J W, Chen Z B, Lu C Y, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A, Żukowski M 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 777 Google Scholar
[2]	Braunstein S L, van Loock P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513 Google Scholar
[3]	Bouwmeester D, Pan J W, Mattle K, Eibl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1997 Nature 390 575 Google Scholar
[4]	Furusawa A, Sørensen J L, Braunstein S L, Fuchs C A, Kimble H J, Polzik E S 1998 Science 282 706 Google Scholar
[5]	Huo M R, Qin J L, Cheng J L, Yan Z H, Qin Z Z, Su X L, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaas9401 Google Scholar
[6]	Pan J W, Bouwmeester D, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3891 Google Scholar
[7]	Jia X J, Su X L, Pan Q, Gao J R, Xie C D, Peng K C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 250503 Google Scholar
[8]	Takeda S, Fuwa M, van Loock P, Furusawa A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 100501 Google Scholar
[9]	Chen Y A, Zhang A N, Zhao Z, Zhou X Q, Lu C Y, Peng C Z, Yang T, Pan J W 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 200502 Google Scholar
[10]	Lance A M, Symul T, Bowen W P, Sanders B C, Lam P K 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 177903 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhou Y Y, Yu J, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Zhang J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 150502 Google Scholar
[12]	Cai X D, Wu D, Su Z S, Chen M C, Wang X L, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 110504 Google Scholar
[13]	Su X L, Hao S H, Deng X W, Ma L Y, Wang M H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2828 Google Scholar
[14]	Kimble H J 2008 Nature 453 1023 Google Scholar
[15]	Glöckl O, Heersink J, Korolkova N, Leuchs G, Lorenz S 2003 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5 S492 Google Scholar
[16]	Iskhakov T Sh, Agafonov I N, Chekhova M V, Leuchs G 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 150502 Google Scholar
[17]	Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Campbell G, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 174 Google Scholar
[18]	Parigi V, Ambrosio V, Arnold C, Marrucci L, Sciarrino F, Laurat J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7706 Google Scholar
[19]	Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Quantum Sci. Technol. 2 024003 Google Scholar
[20]	Pu Y F, Jiang N, Chang W, Yang H X, Li C, Duan L M 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15359 Google Scholar
[21]	Colangelo G, Ciurana F M, Bianchet L C, Sewell R J, Mitchell M W 2017 Nature 543 525 Google Scholar
[22]	Specht H P, Nolleke C, Reiserer A, Uphoff M, Figueroa E, Ritter S, Rempe G 2011 Nature 473 190 Google Scholar
[23]	Facon A, Dietsche E K, Grosso D, Haroche S, Raimond J M, Brune M, Gleyzes S 2016 Nature 535 262 Google Scholar
[24]	Stute A, Casabone B, Schindler P, Monz T, Schmidt P O, Brandstätter B, Northup T E, Blatt R 2012 Nature 485 482 Google Scholar
[25]	Hucul D, Inlek I V, Vittorini G, Crocker C, Debnath S, Clark S M, Monroe C 2014 Nat. Phys. 11 37 Google Scholar
[26]	Fiore V, Yang Y, Kuzyk M C, Barbour R, Tian L, Wang H 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 133601 Google Scholar
[27]	Lee H, Suh M G, Chen T, Li J, Diddams S A, Vahala K J 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2468 Google Scholar
[28]	Riedinger R, Hong S, Norte R A, Slater J A, Shang J, Krause A G, Anant V, Aspelmeyer M, Gröblacher S 2016 Nature 530 313 Google Scholar
[29]	Kiesewetter S, Teh R Y, Drummond P D, Reid M D 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 023601 Google Scholar
[30]	Flurin E, Roch N, Pillet J D, Mallet F, Huard B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 090503 Google Scholar
[31]	Saglamyurek E, Sinclair N, Jin J, Slater J A, Oblak D, Bussieres F, George M, Ricken R, Sohler W, Tittel W 2011 Nature 469 512 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhong M, Hedges M P, Ahlefeldt R L, Bartholomew J G, Beavan S E, Wittig S E, Longdell J J, Sellars M J 2015 Nature 517 177 Google Scholar
[33]	Gao W B, Fallahi P, Togan E, Miguel-Sanchez J, Imamoglu A 2012 Nature 491 426 Google Scholar
[34]	Duan L M, Lukin M D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Nature 414 413 Google Scholar
[35]	Chou C W, de Riedmatten H, Felinto D, Polyakov S V, van Enk S J, Kimble H J 2005 Nature 438 828 Google Scholar
[36]	Yuan Z S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Chen S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2008 Nature 454 1098 Google Scholar
[37]	Choi K S, Deng H, Laurat J, Kimble H J 2008 Nature 452 67 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang W, Ding D S, Dong M X, Shi S, Wang K, Liu S L, Li Y, Zhou Z Y, Shi B S, Guo G C 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13514 Google Scholar
[39]	Choi K S, Goban A, Papp S B, van Enk S J, Kimble H J 2010 Nature 468 412 Google Scholar
[40]	Julsgaard B, Kozhekin A E, Polzik E S 2001 Nature 413 400 Google Scholar
[41]	Krauter H, Muschik C A, Jensen K, Wasilewski W, Petersen J M, Cirac J I, Polzik E S 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 080503 Google Scholar
[42]	Ou Z Y 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 023819 Google Scholar
[43]	Yang X H, Zhou Y Y, Xiao M 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 3479 Google Scholar
[44]	Liu Y H, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Xie C D 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25715 Google Scholar
[45]	Yadsanappleby H, Serafini A 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 1864 Google Scholar
[46]	Tikhonov K S, Golubeva T Y, Golubev Y M 2015 Opt. Spectrosc. 118 773 Google Scholar
[47]	Honda K, Akamatsu D, Arikawa M, Yokoi Y, Akiba K, Nagatsuka S, Tanimura T, Furusawa A, Kozuma M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093601 Google Scholar
[48]	Appel J, Figueroa E, Korystov D, Lobino M, Lvovsky A I 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093602 Google Scholar
[49]	Jensen K, Wasilewski W, Krauter H, Fernholz T, Nielsen B M, Owari M, Plenio M B, Serafini A, Wolf M M, Polzik E S 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 13 Google Scholar
[50]	Yan Z H, Wu L, Jia X J, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Li S J, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 718 Google Scholar
[51]	Grangien P, Slusheg R E, Yurke B, LaPorta A 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2153 Google Scholar
[52]	Polzik E S, Carri J, Kimble H J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3020 Google Scholar
[53]	孙恒信, 刘奎, 张俊香, 郜江瑞 2015 64 234210 Google Scholar Sun H X, Liu K, Zhang J X, Gao J R 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 234210 Google Scholar
[54]	左小杰, 孙颍榕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2018 67 134202 Google Scholar Zuo X J, Sun Y R, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 134202 Google Scholar
[55]	Vahlbruch H, Chelkowski S, Hage B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 011101 Google Scholar
[56]	万振菊, 冯晋霞, 孙志妮, 要立婷, 张宽收 2014 量子光学学报 20 271 Google Scholar Wan Z J, Feng J X, Sun Z N, Yao L T, Zhang K S 2014 Acta Sin. Quantum Opt. 20 271 Google Scholar
[57]	Korolkova N, Leuchs G, Loudon R, Ralph T C, Silberhorn C 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 052306 Google Scholar
[58]	Peuntinger C, Heim B, Müller C R, Gabriel C, Marquardt C, Leuchs G 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 060502 Google Scholar
[59]	Josse V, Dantan A, Vernac L, Bramati A, Pinard M, Giacobino E 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 103601 Google Scholar
[60]	Bowen W P, Schnabel R, Bachor H A, Lam P K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 093601 Google Scholar
[61]	Wu L, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Peng K C 2016 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33 2296 Google Scholar
[62]	Josse V, Dantan A, Vernac L, Bramati A, Pinard M, Giacobino E 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123601 Google Scholar
[63]	闫智辉, 贾晓军, 谢常德, 彭堃墀 2012 61 014206 Google Scholar Yan Z H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 014206 Google Scholar
[64]	Jia X J, Yan Z H, Duan Z Y, Su X L, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 253604 Google Scholar
[65]	Su X L, Zhao Y P, Hao S H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 5178 Google Scholar
[66]	Yan Z H, Jia X J 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 2139 Google Scholar
[67]	Wu L, Yan Z H, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 161102 Google Scholar
[68]	Teh R Y, Reid M D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 062337 Google Scholar
[69]	Duan L M, Giedke G, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2722 Google Scholar
[70]	Bowen W P, Treps N, Schnabel R, Lam P K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 253601 Google Scholar
[71]	van Loock P, Furusawa A 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052315 Google Scholar
[72]	Hofmann H F, Takeuchi S 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 032103 Google Scholar
[73]	Fleischhauer M, Imamoglu A, Marangos J P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 633 Google Scholar
[74]	Lvovsky A I, Sander B C, Tittel W 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 706 Google Scholar
[75]	Duan L M, Monroe C 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1209 Google Scholar
[76]	Hammerer K, Sørensen A S, Polzik E S 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1041 Google Scholar
[77]	Sangouard N, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 33 Google Scholar
[78]	Wootton J R 2012 J. Mod. Opt. 59 1717 Google Scholar
[79]	Bussières F, Sangouard N, Afzelius M, de Riedmatten H, Simon C, Tittel W 2013 J. Mod. Opt. 60 1519 Google Scholar
[80]	Northup T E, Blatt R 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 356 Google Scholar
[81]	Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783 Google Scholar
[82]	Fleischhayer M, Lukin M 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 022314 Google Scholar
[83]	邓瑞婕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2017 66 074201 Google Scholar Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 074201 Google Scholar
[84]	Julsgaard B, Sherson J, Cirac J I, Fiurasek J, Polzik E S 2004 Nature 432 482 Google Scholar
[85]	Hétet G, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 203601 Google Scholar
[86]	Moiseev S, Kröll S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 173601 Google Scholar
[87]	Fleischhauer M, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094 Google Scholar
[88]	杨胜军 2014 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) Yang S J 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[89]	Alexander A L, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Manson N B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043602 Google Scholar
[90]	Ding D S, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Shi S, Xiang G Y, Wang X S, Jiang Y K, Shi B S, Guo G C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 050502 Google Scholar
[91]	Simon R 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2726 Google Scholar
[92]	温馨, 韩亚帅, 刘金玉, 白乐乐, 何军, 王军民 2018 67 024207 Google Scholar Wen X, Han Y S, Liu J Y, Bai L L, He J, Wang J M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 024207 Google Scholar
[93]	吴量, 刘艳红, 邓瑞婕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2017 光学学报 37 0527001 Google Scholar Wu L, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Acta Opt. Sin. 37 0527001 Google Scholar
[94]	Yokoyama S, Ukai R, Armstrong S C, Sornphiphatphong C, Kaji T, Suzuki S, Yoshikawa J, Yonezawa H, Menicucci N C, Furusawa A 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 982 Google Scholar
[95]	Roslund J, Medeiros R, Jiang S, Fabre C, Treps N 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 109 Google Scholar
[96]	Phillips N B, Gorshkov A V, Novikova I 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 063823 Google Scholar
[97]	Lobino M, Kupchak C, Figueroa E, Lvovsky A I 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 203601 Google Scholar
[98]	Lauk N, O’Brien C, Fleischhauer M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013823 Google Scholar
[99]	Barrett S D 2010 New J. Phys. 12 093032 Google Scholar
[100]	Datta A, Zhang L J, Nunn J, Langford N K, Feito A, Plenio M B, Walmsley I A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 060502 Google Scholar
[101]	Bao X H, Reingruber A, Dietrich P, Rui J, Dück A, Strassel T, Li L, Liu N L, Zhao B, Pan J W 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 517 Google Scholar
[102]	Yang S J, Wang X J, Bao X H, Pan J W 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 381 Google Scholar
[103]	Saunders D J, Munns J H D, Champion T F M, Qiu C, Kaczmarek K T, Poem E, Ledingham P M, Walmsley A I, Nunn J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 090501 Google Scholar
[104]	Vahlbruch H, Mehmet M, Danzmann K, Schnabel R 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 110801 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 偏振压缩光场制备原理图

Fig. 1. Schematic of generation system of polarization squeezing.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 Stokes分量(a) ${\hat S_0}$, (b) ${\hat S_1}$, (c)${\hat S_2}$, (d) ${\hat S_3}$的量子噪声的实验测量(HWP, 二分之一波片; QWP, 四分之一波片; PBS, 偏振分束棱镜; +/−, 功率加法/减法器)

Fig. 2. Measurement of quantum noise of Stokes component (a) ${\hat S_0}$, (b) ${\hat S_1}$, (c) ${\hat S_2}$, (d) ${\hat S_3}$. HWP, half-wave plate; QWP, quarter-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; +/−, positive/negative power combiner.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 偏振压缩光Stokes分量的量子噪声^[61]　(a) ${\hat S_0}$; (b) $\hat S{}_1$; (c) ${\hat S_2}$; (d) ${\hat S_3}$

Fig. 3. Quantum noises of Stokes component of polarization squeezedlight^[61]: (a) ${\hat S_0}$; (b) ${\hat S_1}$; (c) ${\hat S_2}$; (d) ${\hat S_3}$.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 偏振纠缠制备原理图

Fig. 4. Schematic for the generation system of polarization entanglement.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 三组分偏振纠缠态产生方案(BS1, 光学分束器1; BS2, 光学分束器2; PBS1, 偏振分束棱镜1; PBS2, 偏振分束棱镜2; PBS3, 偏振分束棱镜3)

Fig. 5. Schematic for the generation of tripartite polarization entangled state. BS1, beam splitter1; BS2, beam splitter2; PBS1, polarization beam splitter1; PBS2, polarization beam splitter2; PBS3, polarization beam splitter3.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 分析频率在1—6 MHz间测量的Stokes关联方差　(a) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_2}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{{d_3}}}}})$; (b) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({g_1}{\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$; (c) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_1}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{d3}}}})$; (d) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {g_2}{\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$; (e) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_1}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{d2}}}})$; (f) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {g_3}{\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$

Fig. 6. Measured correlation variances of (a) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_2}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{{d_3}}}}})$, (b) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({g_1}{\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$, (c) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_1}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{d3}}}})$, (d) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {g_2}{\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$, (e) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{2_{{d_1}}}}} - {\hat S_{{2_{d2}}}})$, (f) ${{\text{δ }}^2}({\hat S_{{3_{{d_1}}}}} + {\hat S_{{3_{{d_2}}}}} + {g_3}{\hat S_{{3_{d3}}}})$ over the analysis frequency rangefrom 1 to 6 MHz.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 原子系综纠缠示意图

Fig. 7. Schematic of atom-atom entanglement generation system.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 三原子系综纠缠实验装置图

Fig. 8. Experimental device diagram of quantum entanglement among three distant atomic ensembles.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 信号光与控制光的时序控制图

Fig. 9. Sequence control of signal and control light.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 测量的输入模式和释放模式的关联方差

Fig. 10. Measured normalized correlation variances of input and released optical submodes.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 释放光模正交分量不同组合的归一化关联方差

Table 1. Values of normalized correlation variances for different combinations.

不同组合的关联方差	输入模式/dB	原子自旋波/dB	释放模式/dB
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({{\hat X}_2} - {{\hat X}_3})} \right\rangle $	−3.30 ± 0.05	−0.56 ± 0.03	−0.37 ± 0.03
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({g_1}{{\hat P}_1} + {{\hat P}_2} + {{\hat P}_3})} \right\rangle $	−2.93 ± 0.05	−0.15 ± 0.02	−0.10 ± 0.02
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({{\hat X}_1} - {{\hat X}_3})} \right\rangle $	−3.25 ± 0.05	−0.53 ± 0.03	−0.35 ± 0.03
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({{\hat P}_1} + {g_2}{{\hat P}_2} + {{\hat P}_3})} \right\rangle $	−2.91 ± 0.05	−0.15 ± 0.02	−0.10 ± 0.02
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({{\hat X}_1} - {{\hat X}_2})} \right\rangle $	−3.25 ± 0.05	−0.52 ± 0.03	−0.34 ± 0.03
$\left\langle {{{\text{δ}}^2}({g_1}{{\hat P}_2} + {{\hat P}_2} + {{\hat P}_3})} \right\rangle $	−2.90 ± 0.05	−0.14 ± 0.02	−0.09 ± 0.02

下载: 导出CSV

map

[1]	Pan J W, Chen Z B, Lu C Y, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A, Żukowski M 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 777 Google Scholar
[2]	Braunstein S L, van Loock P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513 Google Scholar
[3]	Bouwmeester D, Pan J W, Mattle K, Eibl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1997 Nature 390 575 Google Scholar
[4]	Furusawa A, Sørensen J L, Braunstein S L, Fuchs C A, Kimble H J, Polzik E S 1998 Science 282 706 Google Scholar
[5]	Huo M R, Qin J L, Cheng J L, Yan Z H, Qin Z Z, Su X L, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaas9401 Google Scholar
[6]	Pan J W, Bouwmeester D, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3891 Google Scholar
[7]	Jia X J, Su X L, Pan Q, Gao J R, Xie C D, Peng K C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 250503 Google Scholar
[8]	Takeda S, Fuwa M, van Loock P, Furusawa A 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 100501 Google Scholar
[9]	Chen Y A, Zhang A N, Zhao Z, Zhou X Q, Lu C Y, Peng C Z, Yang T, Pan J W 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 200502 Google Scholar
[10]	Lance A M, Symul T, Bowen W P, Sanders B C, Lam P K 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 177903 Google Scholar
[11]	Zhou Y Y, Yu J, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Zhang J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 150502 Google Scholar
[12]	Cai X D, Wu D, Su Z S, Chen M C, Wang X L, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 110504 Google Scholar
[13]	Su X L, Hao S H, Deng X W, Ma L Y, Wang M H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2828 Google Scholar
[14]	Kimble H J 2008 Nature 453 1023 Google Scholar
[15]	Glöckl O, Heersink J, Korolkova N, Leuchs G, Lorenz S 2003 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5 S492 Google Scholar
[16]	Iskhakov T Sh, Agafonov I N, Chekhova M V, Leuchs G 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 150502 Google Scholar
[17]	Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Campbell G, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 174 Google Scholar
[18]	Parigi V, Ambrosio V, Arnold C, Marrucci L, Sciarrino F, Laurat J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7706 Google Scholar
[19]	Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Quantum Sci. Technol. 2 024003 Google Scholar
[20]	Pu Y F, Jiang N, Chang W, Yang H X, Li C, Duan L M 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15359 Google Scholar
[21]	Colangelo G, Ciurana F M, Bianchet L C, Sewell R J, Mitchell M W 2017 Nature 543 525 Google Scholar
[22]	Specht H P, Nolleke C, Reiserer A, Uphoff M, Figueroa E, Ritter S, Rempe G 2011 Nature 473 190 Google Scholar
[23]	Facon A, Dietsche E K, Grosso D, Haroche S, Raimond J M, Brune M, Gleyzes S 2016 Nature 535 262 Google Scholar
[24]	Stute A, Casabone B, Schindler P, Monz T, Schmidt P O, Brandstätter B, Northup T E, Blatt R 2012 Nature 485 482 Google Scholar
[25]	Hucul D, Inlek I V, Vittorini G, Crocker C, Debnath S, Clark S M, Monroe C 2014 Nat. Phys. 11 37 Google Scholar
[26]	Fiore V, Yang Y, Kuzyk M C, Barbour R, Tian L, Wang H 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 133601 Google Scholar
[27]	Lee H, Suh M G, Chen T, Li J, Diddams S A, Vahala K J 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2468 Google Scholar
[28]	Riedinger R, Hong S, Norte R A, Slater J A, Shang J, Krause A G, Anant V, Aspelmeyer M, Gröblacher S 2016 Nature 530 313 Google Scholar
[29]	Kiesewetter S, Teh R Y, Drummond P D, Reid M D 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 023601 Google Scholar
[30]	Flurin E, Roch N, Pillet J D, Mallet F, Huard B 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 090503 Google Scholar
[31]	Saglamyurek E, Sinclair N, Jin J, Slater J A, Oblak D, Bussieres F, George M, Ricken R, Sohler W, Tittel W 2011 Nature 469 512 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhong M, Hedges M P, Ahlefeldt R L, Bartholomew J G, Beavan S E, Wittig S E, Longdell J J, Sellars M J 2015 Nature 517 177 Google Scholar
[33]	Gao W B, Fallahi P, Togan E, Miguel-Sanchez J, Imamoglu A 2012 Nature 491 426 Google Scholar
[34]	Duan L M, Lukin M D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Nature 414 413 Google Scholar
[35]	Chou C W, de Riedmatten H, Felinto D, Polyakov S V, van Enk S J, Kimble H J 2005 Nature 438 828 Google Scholar
[36]	Yuan Z S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Chen S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2008 Nature 454 1098 Google Scholar
[37]	Choi K S, Deng H, Laurat J, Kimble H J 2008 Nature 452 67 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang W, Ding D S, Dong M X, Shi S, Wang K, Liu S L, Li Y, Zhou Z Y, Shi B S, Guo G C 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13514 Google Scholar
[39]	Choi K S, Goban A, Papp S B, van Enk S J, Kimble H J 2010 Nature 468 412 Google Scholar
[40]	Julsgaard B, Kozhekin A E, Polzik E S 2001 Nature 413 400 Google Scholar
[41]	Krauter H, Muschik C A, Jensen K, Wasilewski W, Petersen J M, Cirac J I, Polzik E S 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 080503 Google Scholar
[42]	Ou Z Y 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 023819 Google Scholar
[43]	Yang X H, Zhou Y Y, Xiao M 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 3479 Google Scholar
[44]	Liu Y H, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Xie C D 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 25715 Google Scholar
[45]	Yadsanappleby H, Serafini A 2011 Phys. Lett. A 375 1864 Google Scholar
[46]	Tikhonov K S, Golubeva T Y, Golubev Y M 2015 Opt. Spectrosc. 118 773 Google Scholar
[47]	Honda K, Akamatsu D, Arikawa M, Yokoi Y, Akiba K, Nagatsuka S, Tanimura T, Furusawa A, Kozuma M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093601 Google Scholar
[48]	Appel J, Figueroa E, Korystov D, Lobino M, Lvovsky A I 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 093602 Google Scholar
[49]	Jensen K, Wasilewski W, Krauter H, Fernholz T, Nielsen B M, Owari M, Plenio M B, Serafini A, Wolf M M, Polzik E S 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 13 Google Scholar
[50]	Yan Z H, Wu L, Jia X J, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Li S J, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 718 Google Scholar
[51]	Grangien P, Slusheg R E, Yurke B, LaPorta A 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 2153 Google Scholar
[52]	Polzik E S, Carri J, Kimble H J 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3020 Google Scholar
[53]	孙恒信, 刘奎, 张俊香, 郜江瑞 2015 64 234210 Google Scholar Sun H X, Liu K, Zhang J X, Gao J R 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 234210 Google Scholar
[54]	左小杰, 孙颍榕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2018 67 134202 Google Scholar Zuo X J, Sun Y R, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 134202 Google Scholar
[55]	Vahlbruch H, Chelkowski S, Hage B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 011101 Google Scholar
[56]	万振菊, 冯晋霞, 孙志妮, 要立婷, 张宽收 2014 量子光学学报 20 271 Google Scholar Wan Z J, Feng J X, Sun Z N, Yao L T, Zhang K S 2014 Acta Sin. Quantum Opt. 20 271 Google Scholar
[57]	Korolkova N, Leuchs G, Loudon R, Ralph T C, Silberhorn C 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 052306 Google Scholar
[58]	Peuntinger C, Heim B, Müller C R, Gabriel C, Marquardt C, Leuchs G 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 060502 Google Scholar
[59]	Josse V, Dantan A, Vernac L, Bramati A, Pinard M, Giacobino E 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 103601 Google Scholar
[60]	Bowen W P, Schnabel R, Bachor H A, Lam P K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 093601 Google Scholar
[61]	Wu L, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J, Peng K C 2016 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33 2296 Google Scholar
[62]	Josse V, Dantan A, Vernac L, Bramati A, Pinard M, Giacobino E 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123601 Google Scholar
[63]	闫智辉, 贾晓军, 谢常德, 彭堃墀 2012 61 014206 Google Scholar Yan Z H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 014206 Google Scholar
[64]	Jia X J, Yan Z H, Duan Z Y, Su X L, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 253604 Google Scholar
[65]	Su X L, Zhao Y P, Hao S H, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 5178 Google Scholar
[66]	Yan Z H, Jia X J 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32 2139 Google Scholar
[67]	Wu L, Yan Z H, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Jia X J, Xie C D, Peng K C 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 161102 Google Scholar
[68]	Teh R Y, Reid M D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 062337 Google Scholar
[69]	Duan L M, Giedke G, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2722 Google Scholar
[70]	Bowen W P, Treps N, Schnabel R, Lam P K 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 253601 Google Scholar
[71]	van Loock P, Furusawa A 2003 Phys. Rev. A 67 052315 Google Scholar
[72]	Hofmann H F, Takeuchi S 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 032103 Google Scholar
[73]	Fleischhauer M, Imamoglu A, Marangos J P 2005 Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 633 Google Scholar
[74]	Lvovsky A I, Sander B C, Tittel W 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 706 Google Scholar
[75]	Duan L M, Monroe C 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1209 Google Scholar
[76]	Hammerer K, Sørensen A S, Polzik E S 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1041 Google Scholar
[77]	Sangouard N, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 33 Google Scholar
[78]	Wootton J R 2012 J. Mod. Opt. 59 1717 Google Scholar
[79]	Bussières F, Sangouard N, Afzelius M, de Riedmatten H, Simon C, Tittel W 2013 J. Mod. Opt. 60 1519 Google Scholar
[80]	Northup T E, Blatt R 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 356 Google Scholar
[81]	Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783 Google Scholar
[82]	Fleischhayer M, Lukin M 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 022314 Google Scholar
[83]	邓瑞婕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2017 66 074201 Google Scholar Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 074201 Google Scholar
[84]	Julsgaard B, Sherson J, Cirac J I, Fiurasek J, Polzik E S 2004 Nature 432 482 Google Scholar
[85]	Hétet G, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 203601 Google Scholar
[86]	Moiseev S, Kröll S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 173601 Google Scholar
[87]	Fleischhauer M, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094 Google Scholar
[88]	杨胜军 2014 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) Yang S J 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[89]	Alexander A L, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Manson N B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043602 Google Scholar
[90]	Ding D S, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Shi S, Xiang G Y, Wang X S, Jiang Y K, Shi B S, Guo G C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 050502 Google Scholar
[91]	Simon R 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2726 Google Scholar
[92]	温馨, 韩亚帅, 刘金玉, 白乐乐, 何军, 王军民 2018 67 024207 Google Scholar Wen X, Han Y S, Liu J Y, Bai L L, He J, Wang J M 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 024207 Google Scholar
[93]	吴量, 刘艳红, 邓瑞婕, 闫智辉, 贾晓军 2017 光学学报 37 0527001 Google Scholar Wu L, Liu Y H, Deng R J, Yan Z H, Jia X J 2017 Acta Opt. Sin. 37 0527001 Google Scholar
[94]	Yokoyama S, Ukai R, Armstrong S C, Sornphiphatphong C, Kaji T, Suzuki S, Yoshikawa J, Yonezawa H, Menicucci N C, Furusawa A 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 982 Google Scholar
[95]	Roslund J, Medeiros R, Jiang S, Fabre C, Treps N 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 109 Google Scholar
[96]	Phillips N B, Gorshkov A V, Novikova I 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 063823 Google Scholar
[97]	Lobino M, Kupchak C, Figueroa E, Lvovsky A I 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 203601 Google Scholar
[98]	Lauk N, O’Brien C, Fleischhauer M 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013823 Google Scholar
[99]	Barrett S D 2010 New J. Phys. 12 093032 Google Scholar
[100]	Datta A, Zhang L J, Nunn J, Langford N K, Feito A, Plenio M B, Walmsley I A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 060502 Google Scholar
[101]	Bao X H, Reingruber A, Dietrich P, Rui J, Dück A, Strassel T, Li L, Liu N L, Zhao B, Pan J W 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 517 Google Scholar
[102]	Yang S J, Wang X J, Bao X H, Pan J W 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 381 Google Scholar
[103]	Saunders D J, Munns J H D, Champion T F M, Qiu C, Kaczmarek K T, Poem E, Ledingham P M, Walmsley A I, Nunn J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 090501 Google Scholar
[104]	Vahlbruch H, Mehmet M, Danzmann K, Schnabel R 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 110801 Google Scholar

[1]	夏刚, 张亚鹏, 汤婧雯, 李春燕, 吴春旺, 张杰, 周艳丽. 电磁感应透明条件下里德伯原子系统的亚稳动力学. , 2024, 73(10): 104203. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240233
[2]	周飞, 贾凤东, 刘修彬, 张剑, 谢锋, 钟志萍. 基于冷里德堡原子电磁感应透明的微波电场测量. , 2023, 72(4): 045204. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222059
[3]	裴丽娅, 郑世阳, 牛金艳. 基于调控原子相干的Λ-型电磁感应透明与吸收. , 2022, 71(22): 224201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220950
[4]	严冬, 王彬彬, 白文杰, 刘兵, 杜秀国, 任春年. 里德伯电磁感应透明中的相位. , 2019, 68(8): 084203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181938
[5]	李雪琴, 赵云芳, 唐艳妮, 杨卫军. 基于金刚石氮-空位色心自旋系综与超导量子电路混合系统的量子节点纠缠. , 2018, 67(7): 070302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172634
[6]	杨智伟, 焦月春, 韩小萱, 赵建明, 贾锁堂. 弱射频场中Rydberg原子的电磁感应透明. , 2017, 66(9): 093202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.093202
[7]	杨智伟, 焦月春, 韩小萱, 赵建明, 贾锁堂. 调制激光场中Rydberg原子的电磁感应透明. , 2016, 65(10): 103201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.103201
[8]	陈秋成. 半导体三量子点电磁感应透明介质中的非线性法拉第偏转. , 2016, 65(24): 247801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.247801
[9]	白金海, 芦小刚, 缪兴绪, 裴丽娅, 王梦, 高艳磊, 王如泉, 吴令安, 傅盘铭, 左战春. Rb87冷原子电磁感应透明吸收曲线不对称性的分析. , 2015, 64(3): 034206. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034206
[10]	王梦, 白金海, 裴丽娅, 芦小刚, 高艳磊, 王如泉, 吴令安, 杨世平, 庞兆广, 傅盘铭, 左战春. 铷原子耦合光频率近共振时的电磁感应透明. , 2015, 64(15): 154208. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.154208
[11]	赵虎, 李铁夫, 刘建设, 陈炜. 基于超导量子比特的电磁感应透明研究进展. , 2012, 61(15): 154214. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.154214
[12]	佘彦超, 张蔚曦, 王登龙. 电磁感应透明介质中非线性法拉第偏转. , 2011, 60(6): 064205. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.064205
[13]	佘彦超, 王登龙, 丁建文. 电磁感应透明介质中的弱光空间暗孤子环. , 2009, 58(5): 3198-3202. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3198
[14]	刘春旭, 张继森, 刘俊业, 金光. Er3+：YAlO3晶体中Λ型四能级系统的量子相干左手性. , 2009, 58(8): 5778-5783. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5778
[15]	庄飞, 沈建其, 叶军. 调控电磁感应透明气体折射率实现可控光子带隙结构. , 2007, 56(1): 541-545. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.541
[16]	陈峻, 刘正东, 郑军, 方慧娟. 基于量子干涉效应的四能级原子系统中的vacuum-induced coherence效应. , 2007, 56(11): 6441-6445. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6441
[17]	姚鸣, 朱卡的, 袁晓忠, 蒋逸文, 吴卓杰. 声子辅助的电磁感应透明和超慢光效应的研究. , 2006, 55(4): 1769-1773. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1769
[18]	房元锋, 杜春光, 李师群. 光子晶体中四能级系统的量子相干效应. , 2006, 55(9): 4652-4658. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4652
[19]	刘正东, 武　强. 被三个耦合场驱动的四能级原子的电磁感应透明. , 2004, 53(9): 2970-2973. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2970
[20]	赵建明, 赵延霆, 黄涛, 肖连团, 贾锁堂. 双抽运光作用电磁感应透明的实验研究. , 2004, 53(4): 1023-1026. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1023

计量

文章访问数: 20169
PDF下载量: 179
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板