-
X-ray emissionproduced by highly charged ions with the energy range near the Bohr velocity involves complicated atomic process. However, duo to the limitation of experimental conditions, the relevant researches are nearly absent. It is unclear whether the existing theory is applicable in such an energy range. This needs further exploring. In the present work, K X-ray spectra of Al excited by H+, He2+ and highly charged heavy ions I22+ and Xe20+ are investigated by using an Si drift X-ray detector in the energy range near the Bohr velocity. The X-ray production cross sections are extracted from the X-ray counts and compared with the theoretical simulations from PWBA, ECPSSR and modified BEA model. It is indicated that the cross section increases with the augment of projectile energy. With the same incident energy per nucleon, the cross section induced by highly charged heavy ions is a factor of about 104 larger than that by light ions . With the impact of H+ and He2+ ions, the K-shell electrons are mainly knocked off through the direct Coulomb ionization, and the X-ray emission cross section can be well predicted by ECPSSR theory. For the bombardment of highly charged heavy ions I22+ and Xe20+, except for the Coulomb ionization, the orbital electrons can also be excited by electron capture. The BEA simulation after being modified by both Coulomb repulsion and effective charge can well predict the X-ray production cross section.
-
Keywords:
- ions /
- X-ray /
- production cross section /
- BEA /
- ECPSSR
[1] Zhou X M, Cheng R, Zhao Y T, Lei Y, Chen Y H, Chen X M, Wang Y Y, Ma X W, Xiao G Q 2018 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 416 94
Google Scholar
[2] Whilhelm R A, Gruber E, Schwestka J, Kozubek R, Madeira T I, Marques J P, Kobus J, Krasheninnikov A V, Schleberger M, Aumayr F 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 103401
Google Scholar
[3] Guo Y P, Yang Z H, Hu B T, Wang X L, Song Z Y, Xu Q M, Zhang B L, Chen J, Yang B, Yang J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 30644
Google Scholar
[4] 柳钰, 徐忠锋, 王兴, 曾利霞, 刘婷 2020 69 043201
Google Scholar
Liu Y, Xu Z F, Wang X, Zeng L X, Liu T 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 043201
Google Scholar
[5] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 周贤明, 王兴, 梅策香, 肖国青 2018 67 243201
Google Scholar
Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Zhou X M, Wang X, Mei C X, Xiao G Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 243201
Google Scholar
[6] 梅策香, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 任洁茹, 王兴, 雷瑜, 孙渊博, 程锐, 徐戈, 曾利霞 2017 66 143401
Google Scholar
Mei C X, Zhang X A, Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Ren J R, Wang X, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Cheng R, Xu G, Zeng L X 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 143401
Google Scholar
[7] 张小安, 梅策香, 张颖, 赵永涛, 徐忠峰, 周贤明, 任洁茹, 程锐, 梁昌慧, 李耀宗, 曾丽霞, 杨治虎, 陈熙萌, 李福利, 肖国庆 2016 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 46 073006
Google Scholar
Zhang X A, Mei C X, Zhang Y, Zhao Y T, Xu Z F, Zhou X M, Ren J R, Cheng R, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Zeng L X, Yang Z H, Chen X M, Li F L, Xiao G Q 2016 Sci Sin-Phys. Mech. Astron. 46 073006
Google Scholar
[8] Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 A336
Google Scholar
[9] Johnson D E, Basbas G, McDaniel F D 1979 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 24 1
Google Scholar
[10] Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
Google Scholar
[11] Meyerhof W E, Anholt R, Saylor T K, Lazarus S M, Little A, Chase L F 1976 Phys. Rev. A 14 1653
Google Scholar
[12] Lapicki G 1989 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Date 18 111
Google Scholar
[13] Lapicki G 2005 X-ray Spectrom 34 269
Google Scholar
[14] Miranda J, Lapicki G 2014 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 100 651
Google Scholar
[15] Kahoul A, Nekkab M, Deghfel B 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. B 266 4969
Google Scholar
[16] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 肖国青 2021 70 183201
Google Scholar
Liang C H, Zhang X A, Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 183201
Google Scholar
[17] Zhou X M, Wei J, Cheng R, Chen Y H, Mei C X, Zeng L X, Liu Y, Zhang Y N, Liang C H, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 063204
Google Scholar
[18] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 赵永涛, 曾利霞, 梅策香, 梁昌慧, 李耀宗, 张小安, 肖国青 2021 70 023201
Google Scholar
Zhou X M, Wei J, Cheng R, Zhao Y T, Zeng L X, Mei C X, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Zhang X A, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 023201
Google Scholar
[19] Bearden J A 1967 Rev. Mod. Phys 39 78
Google Scholar
[20] Krause M O and Oliver J H 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8 329
Google Scholar
[21] Campbell J L 2003 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 85 291
Google Scholar
[22] Campbell J L 2009 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 95 115
Google Scholar
[23] Thompson A C, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson Al, Underwood J H, Kim K J, Kirz J, Lindau I, Pianetta P, Winick H, Williams G P, Scofield J H (Edited by Thompson A C, Vaughan D) 2001 X-Ray Data Book (http://xdb.lbl.gov/)
[24] Czarnota M, Pajek M, Banaś D, et al. 2006 Braz. J. Phys. 36 546
Google Scholar
[25] Semaniak J, Braziewicz J, Pajek M, Czyżewski T, Głowacka L, Jaskóła M, Hailer M, Karschnick R, Kretschmer W, Halabuka Z, Trautmann D 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 1125
Google Scholar
[26] Sarkadi L, Mukoyama T 1980 J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Phys. 13 2255
Google Scholar
[27] Watson R L, Blackadar J M, Horvat V 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 2959
Google Scholar
[28] Banaś D, Pajek M, Semaniak J, Braziewicza J, Kubala-Kukuśa A, Majewskaa U, Czyżewskib T, Jaskółab M, Kretschmerc W, Mukoyamad T, Trautmanne D 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 195 233
Google Scholar
[29] Basbas G, Brandt W, Roman L 1973 Phys. Rev. A 7 983
Google Scholar
[30] Ziegler J F, Ziegler M D, Biersack J P 2019 Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science (Springer) pp93–129
[31] Pajek M, Kobzev A P, Sandrik R, Iikhamov R A, Kusmurodov S H 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 42 346
Google Scholar
[32] 周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2021 65 027901
Google Scholar
Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901
Google Scholar
[33] Cohen D D, Harrigan M 1985 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33 255
Google Scholar
[34] Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
Google Scholar
[35] Lapicki G, Mehta R, Duggan J I, Kocur P M, Price J L, McDaniel F D 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 3813
Google Scholar
[36] Brandt W, Laubert R, Sellin I 1966 Phys. Rev. 151 56
Google Scholar
[37] Shima K 1978 Phys. Lett. A 67 351
Google Scholar
[38] Khan J M, Potter D L 1964 Phys. Rev. 133 A 890
[39] Khan J M, Potter O L, Worley R D 1965 Phys. Rev. 139 A 1735
[40] Needham P B, Jr., Sartwell B O 1970 Phys. Rev. A 2 27
Google Scholar
[41] Shima K, Makino I, Sakisaka M 1971 Jpn. J. Phys. 31 971
Google Scholar
[42] Magon C, Milazzo M, Pizzi C, Porro F, Rota A, Ric-cobono G 1979 Nuovo. Cimento. A 54 277
Google Scholar
[43] Morita S, Kamiya M 1997 Chin. J. Phys. 15 199
[44] Slater J C 1930 Phys. Rev. 36 57
Google Scholar
[45] Liu S Z 1986 Atomic Structure and Chemical Periodic System of Elements (Beijing: Science and Technology Press) p108
-
图 1 实验装置示意图(1–离子源; 2–分析磁铁; 3–高压加速平台; 4–光阑; 5–90°偏转磁铁; 6–四级透镜; 7–60°偏转磁铁; 8–超高真空靶室; 9–靶; 10–X射线探测器; 11–X射线记录系统; 12–穿透式法拉第筒; 13–法拉第筒; 14–离子计数记录系统; FC为束流线上可插拔式法拉第筒)
Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of experiment setup: 1–ECR ion source; 2–analyzing magnet; 3–high volt accelerate platform; 4–barrier; 5–90° deflection magnet; 6–magnetic quadrupled lens; 7–60° deflection magnet; 8–ultrahigh vacuum target chamber; 9–target; 10–silicon drift detector; 11–X-ray recording system; 12–penetrable faraday cup; 13–common faraday cup; 14–projectile number recording system, FC is the faraday cup.
图 2 SDD在0.5—4 keV范围内的探测效率
Fig. 2. Efficiency of the SDD detector in the energy region of 0.5–4.0 keV.
图 3 不同离子入射激发Al的典型X射线谱(曲线为高斯拟合, xc为谱线中心能量, W为谱线的半高全宽)
Fig. 3. Typical X-ray spectrum of Al induced by various projectile (The curve is Gauss fitting, xc and W is the central energy and full width at half maximum of the spectral line, respectively).
图 4 不同离子激发Al的K壳层X射线产生截面随单核子能量变化
Fig. 4. Al K X-ray cross section excited by various projectile
图 5 H+激发的发射实验截面与理论模拟
Fig. 5. Experimental cross section excited by H+, and theory simulations.
图 6 He2+激发的发射实验截面与理论模拟
Fig. 6. Experimental cross section excited by He2+, and theory simulations.
图 7 I22+激发的实验发射截面与理论模拟
Fig. 7. Experimental cross section excited by I22+, and theory simulations.
图 8 Xe20+激发的实验发射截面与理论模拟
Fig. 8. Experimental cross section excited by Xe20+, and theory simulations.
表 1 不同离子激发Al的 K X射线实验发射截面
Table 1. Al K X-ray cross section excited by various projectile.
离子种类 入射能量/MeV 截面/barn H+ 0.05 (1.06 ± 0.17) × 10–1 0.10 2.15 ± 0.34 0.15 9.06 ± 1.45 0.20 (2.03 ± 0.33) × 101 0.25 (4.50 ± 0.72) × 101 0.30 (7.73 ± 0.12) × 101 He2+ 0.10 (5.98 ± 0.96) × 10–3 0.20 (2.14 ± 0.34) × 10–1 0.30 1.10 ± 0.18 0.40 3.88 ± 0.62 0.50 9.25 ± 1.48 0.60 (2.42 ± 0.39) × 101 I22+ 2.00 (3.93 ± 0.63) × 101 2.50 (4.73 ± 0.78) × 101 3.00 (6.09 ± 0.97) × 101 3.50 (6.84 ±1.09) × 101 4.00 (7.57 ± 1.21) × 101 4.50 (7.99 ± 1.28) × 101 5.00 (9.18 ± 1.47) × 101 Xe20+ 1.20 (1.94 ± 0.31) × 101 2.40 (4.67 ± 0.74) × 101 3.00 (6.32 ± 1.01) × 101 3.60 (7.68 ± 1.23) × 101 4.80 (1.04 ± 0.17) × 102 6.00 (1.21 ± 0.19) × 102 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Zhou X M, Cheng R, Zhao Y T, Lei Y, Chen Y H, Chen X M, Wang Y Y, Ma X W, Xiao G Q 2018 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 416 94
Google Scholar
[2] Whilhelm R A, Gruber E, Schwestka J, Kozubek R, Madeira T I, Marques J P, Kobus J, Krasheninnikov A V, Schleberger M, Aumayr F 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 103401
Google Scholar
[3] Guo Y P, Yang Z H, Hu B T, Wang X L, Song Z Y, Xu Q M, Zhang B L, Chen J, Yang B, Yang J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 30644
Google Scholar
[4] 柳钰, 徐忠锋, 王兴, 曾利霞, 刘婷 2020 69 043201
Google Scholar
Liu Y, Xu Z F, Wang X, Zeng L X, Liu T 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 043201
Google Scholar
[5] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 周贤明, 王兴, 梅策香, 肖国青 2018 67 243201
Google Scholar
Liang C H, Zhang X A, Li Y Z, Zhao Y T, Zhou X M, Wang X, Mei C X, Xiao G Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 243201
Google Scholar
[6] 梅策香, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 任洁茹, 王兴, 雷瑜, 孙渊博, 程锐, 徐戈, 曾利霞 2017 66 143401
Google Scholar
Mei C X, Zhang X A, Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Ren J R, Wang X, Lei Y, Sun Y B, Cheng R, Xu G, Zeng L X 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 143401
Google Scholar
[7] 张小安, 梅策香, 张颖, 赵永涛, 徐忠峰, 周贤明, 任洁茹, 程锐, 梁昌慧, 李耀宗, 曾丽霞, 杨治虎, 陈熙萌, 李福利, 肖国庆 2016 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学 46 073006
Google Scholar
Zhang X A, Mei C X, Zhang Y, Zhao Y T, Xu Z F, Zhou X M, Ren J R, Cheng R, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Zeng L X, Yang Z H, Chen X M, Li F L, Xiao G Q 2016 Sci Sin-Phys. Mech. Astron. 46 073006
Google Scholar
[8] Gryzinski M 1965 Phys. Rev. A 138 A336
Google Scholar
[9] Johnson D E, Basbas G, McDaniel F D 1979 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 24 1
Google Scholar
[10] Brandt W, Lapicki G 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23 1717
Google Scholar
[11] Meyerhof W E, Anholt R, Saylor T K, Lazarus S M, Little A, Chase L F 1976 Phys. Rev. A 14 1653
Google Scholar
[12] Lapicki G 1989 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Date 18 111
Google Scholar
[13] Lapicki G 2005 X-ray Spectrom 34 269
Google Scholar
[14] Miranda J, Lapicki G 2014 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 100 651
Google Scholar
[15] Kahoul A, Nekkab M, Deghfel B 2008 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. , Sect. B 266 4969
Google Scholar
[16] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 肖国青 2021 70 183201
Google Scholar
Liang C H, Zhang X A, Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 183201
Google Scholar
[17] Zhou X M, Wei J, Cheng R, Chen Y H, Mei C X, Zeng L X, Liu Y, Zhang Y N, Liang C H, Zhao Y T, Zhang X A 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 063204
Google Scholar
[18] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 赵永涛, 曾利霞, 梅策香, 梁昌慧, 李耀宗, 张小安, 肖国青 2021 70 023201
Google Scholar
Zhou X M, Wei J, Cheng R, Zhao Y T, Zeng L X, Mei C X, Liang C H, Li Y Z, Zhang X A, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 023201
Google Scholar
[19] Bearden J A 1967 Rev. Mod. Phys 39 78
Google Scholar
[20] Krause M O and Oliver J H 1979 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8 329
Google Scholar
[21] Campbell J L 2003 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 85 291
Google Scholar
[22] Campbell J L 2009 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 95 115
Google Scholar
[23] Thompson A C, Attwood D T, Gullikson E M, Howells M R, Kortright J B, Robinson Al, Underwood J H, Kim K J, Kirz J, Lindau I, Pianetta P, Winick H, Williams G P, Scofield J H (Edited by Thompson A C, Vaughan D) 2001 X-Ray Data Book (http://xdb.lbl.gov/)
[24] Czarnota M, Pajek M, Banaś D, et al. 2006 Braz. J. Phys. 36 546
Google Scholar
[25] Semaniak J, Braziewicz J, Pajek M, Czyżewski T, Głowacka L, Jaskóła M, Hailer M, Karschnick R, Kretschmer W, Halabuka Z, Trautmann D 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 1125
Google Scholar
[26] Sarkadi L, Mukoyama T 1980 J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Phys. 13 2255
Google Scholar
[27] Watson R L, Blackadar J M, Horvat V 1999 Phys. Rev. A 60 2959
Google Scholar
[28] Banaś D, Pajek M, Semaniak J, Braziewicza J, Kubala-Kukuśa A, Majewskaa U, Czyżewskib T, Jaskółab M, Kretschmerc W, Mukoyamad T, Trautmanne D 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 195 233
Google Scholar
[29] Basbas G, Brandt W, Roman L 1973 Phys. Rev. A 7 983
Google Scholar
[30] Ziegler J F, Ziegler M D, Biersack J P 2019 Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science (Springer) pp93–129
[31] Pajek M, Kobzev A P, Sandrik R, Iikhamov R A, Kusmurodov S H 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 42 346
Google Scholar
[32] 周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青 2021 65 027901
Google Scholar
Zhou X M, Zhao Y T, Cheng R, Lei Y, Wang Y Y, Ren J R, Liu S D, Mei C X, Chen X M, Xiao G Q 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 027901
Google Scholar
[33] Cohen D D, Harrigan M 1985 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33 255
Google Scholar
[34] Lapicki G, Murty G A V R, Raju G J N, Reddy B S, Reddy S B, Vijayan V 2004 Phys. Rev. A 70 062718
Google Scholar
[35] Lapicki G, Mehta R, Duggan J I, Kocur P M, Price J L, McDaniel F D 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34 3813
Google Scholar
[36] Brandt W, Laubert R, Sellin I 1966 Phys. Rev. 151 56
Google Scholar
[37] Shima K 1978 Phys. Lett. A 67 351
Google Scholar
[38] Khan J M, Potter D L 1964 Phys. Rev. 133 A 890
[39] Khan J M, Potter O L, Worley R D 1965 Phys. Rev. 139 A 1735
[40] Needham P B, Jr., Sartwell B O 1970 Phys. Rev. A 2 27
Google Scholar
[41] Shima K, Makino I, Sakisaka M 1971 Jpn. J. Phys. 31 971
Google Scholar
[42] Magon C, Milazzo M, Pizzi C, Porro F, Rota A, Ric-cobono G 1979 Nuovo. Cimento. A 54 277
Google Scholar
[43] Morita S, Kamiya M 1997 Chin. J. Phys. 15 199
[44] Slater J C 1930 Phys. Rev. 36 57
Google Scholar
[45] Liu S Z 1986 Atomic Structure and Chemical Periodic System of Elements (Beijing: Science and Technology Press) p108
-
[1] 梅策香, 张小安, 周贤明, 梁昌慧, 曾利霞, 张艳宁, 杜树斌, 郭义盼, 杨治虎. 类氦C离子诱发不同金属厚靶原子的K-X射线. , 2024, 73(4): 043201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231477 [2] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 梅策香, 曾利霞, 王兴, 梁昌慧, 赵永涛, 张小安. 数百MeV/u高能区C6+离子激发W的L壳层 X射线. , 2022, 71(11): 113201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20212322 [3] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 梅策香, 曾利霞, 王兴, 梁昌慧, 赵永涛, 张小安. 数百MeV/u高能区C6+离子激发W的L X射线研究. , 2022, 0(0): 0-0. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212322 [4] 李博, 李玲, 朱敬军, 林炜平, 安竹. 采用薄靶方法测量低能电子致Al, Ti, Cu, Ag, Au元素K壳层电离截面与L壳层特征X射线产生截面. , 2022, 71(17): 173402. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220162 [5] 周贤明, 尉静, 程锐, 赵永涛, 曾利霞, 梅策香, 梁昌慧, 李耀宗, 张小安, 肖国青. 近Bohr速度I20+离子在不同靶面上的L壳层X射线辐射. , 2021, 70(2): 023201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201236 [6] 张秉章, 宋张勇, 刘璇, 钱程, 方兴, 邵曹杰, 王伟, 刘俊亮, 徐俊奎, 冯勇, 朱志超, 郭艳玲, 陈林, 孙良亭, 杨治虎, 于得洋. 低能高电荷态 ${\boldsymbol{ {\rm{O}}^{q+}}}$ 离子与Al表面作用产生的X射线. , 2021, 70(19): 193201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210757[7] 李瑶, 苏桐, 雷凡, 徐能, 盛立志, 赵宝升. 等离子体中X射线透过率分析及潜在通信应用研究. , 2019, 68(4): 040401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181973 [8] 梅策香, 张小安, 周贤明, 赵永涛, 任洁茹, 王兴, 雷瑜, 孙渊博, 程锐, 徐戈, 曾利霞. 高能脉冲C6+离子束激发Ni靶的K壳层X射线. , 2017, 66(14): 143401. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.143401 [9] 周贤明, 赵永涛, 程锐, 雷瑜, 王瑜玉, 任洁茹, 刘世东, 梅策香, 陈熙萌, 肖国青. 近玻尔速度氙离子激发钒的K壳层X射线. , 2016, 65(2): 027901. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.027901 [10] 席发元, 吕会议. 不同 Ep/q 值的离子与氧化铝毛细孔的相互作用. , 2013, 62(1): 016104. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.016104 [11] 张小安, 梅策香, 赵永涛, 程锐, 王兴, 周贤明, 雷瑜, 孙渊博, 徐戈, 任洁茹. CSR上C6+脉冲束激发Au靶的X射线辐射. , 2013, 62(17): 173401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.173401 [12] 梁昌慧, 张小安, 李耀宗, 赵永涛, 梅策香, 程锐, 周贤明, 雷瑜, 王兴, 孙渊博, 肖国青. 近Bohr速度的152Eu20+入射Au表面产生的X射线谱. , 2013, 62(6): 063202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.063202 [13] 邹贤容, 邵剑雄, 陈熙萌, 崔莹. 高电荷态Ar17+离子在表面以下过程中发射X射线分支比及各分支能量的研究. , 2010, 59(9): 6064-6070. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6064 [14] 张小安, 杨治虎, 王党朝, 梅策香, 牛超英, 王伟, 戴斌, 肖国青. 类钴氙离子入射Ni表面激发的红外光谱线和X射线谱. , 2009, 58(10): 6920-6925. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6920 [15] 张泊丽, 杨治虎, 杜树斌, 常宏伟, 薛迎丽, 宋张勇, 朱可欣, 田野. 20—50MeV O5+离子引起Au的L壳层X射线产生截面研究. , 2009, 58(9): 6113-6116. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6113 [16] 杨治虎, 宋张勇, 崔 莹, 张红强, 阮芳芳, 邵剑雄, 杜 娟, 刘玉文, 朱可欣, 张小安, 邵曹杰, 卢荣春, 于得洋, 陈熙萌, 蔡晓红. Ar16+和Ar17+离子与Zr作用产生的X射线谱. , 2008, 57(2): 803-807. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.803 [17] 杨治虎, 宋张勇, 陈熙萌, 张小安, 张艳萍, 赵永涛, 崔 莹, 张红强, 徐 徐, 邵健雄, 于得洋, 蔡晓红. 高电荷态离子Arq+与不同金属靶作用产生的X射线. , 2006, 55(5): 2221-2227. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2221 [18] 邱华檀, 王友年, 马腾才. 碰撞效应对入射到射频偏压电极上离子能量分布和角度分布的影响. , 2002, 51(6): 1332-1337. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1332 [19] 戴忠玲, 王友年, 马腾才. 射频等离子体鞘层动力学模型. , 2001, 50(12): 2398-2402. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2398 [20] 杨国洪, 张继彦, 张保汉, 周裕清, 李 军. 金激光等离子体X射线精细结构谱研究. , 2000, 49(12): 2389-2393. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2389
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 3752
- PDF下载量: 49
- 被引次数: 0
