搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

准直的O2分子高次谐波谱中的干涉效应

袁长全 郭迎春 王兵兵

引用本文:
Citation:

准直的O2分子高次谐波谱中的干涉效应

袁长全, 郭迎春, 王兵兵

Interference effect in high order harmonic generation by aligned O2

Yuan Chang-Quan, Guo Ying-Chun, Wang Bing-Bing
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 高次谐波是强场物理的重要现象, 不仅是潜在的深紫外光源,而且已经成为分析原子分子动力学以及获取分子结构信息的重要工具. 本文采用Lewenstein理论, 考察了准直氧分子在激光场中的高次谐波谱对激光偏振方向与核轴所成的夹角的依赖关系. 通过计算电离电子在不同的原子中心复合的量子通道对高次谐波贡献之间的相位差, 分析了高次谐波随激光场偏振方向与核轴的夹角的变化, 并给出了谐波谱上最小值的形成机制. 另外, 通过分析高次谐波产生过程中不同量子通道的贡献, 发现当偏振方向与核轴成0°和90°时, 谐波谱强度都小, 但它们背后的物理图像是不同的: 0°时, 产生谐波的每个量子通道的幅度都很小, 造成谐波谱的强度较低; 而90°时, 每个通道贡献的幅度都很高, 但是由于通道间的干涉相消, 造成谐波谱的强度接近于零.
    High order harmonic generation (HHG) is an important phenomenon when atoms or molecules interact with an intense laser field. It can be used to generate ultrashort laser source, and can also be used to investigate the atomic and molecular dynamics and obtain the electric structure information of molecules. All these require to understand in depth the mechanism of HHG. There are complicated interference effects in HHG spectra of molecules due to multiple re-collision atomic centers in the molecule. In this paper, spectra of aligned O2 molecule in linearly polarized laser field is investigated by using the Lewenstein' s model. The dependence of the spectrum on the angle θ between the nuclear axis of the molecule and the laser polarization direction is obtained. It is shown that the maximum yield of HHG occurs at θ of 45°, which is in consistence with the experimental result. In addition, it is found that there exists a minimum value in the HHG spectrum for any given value of θ. The harmonic order corresponding to the minimum increases with θ increasing. It is found that the minimum comes from the coherent superposition of contributions from two channels. One channel refers to that the ionized electron from one atomic center, subjected to the electric field of the laser, moves back to its parent atomic center and there it combines with the molecule and emits harmonics; while the other channel is that the ionized electron generated from one atomic center move back to the other atomic center to complete the combination and emission of harmonics. The angle θ-dependent phase difference between contributions from these two channels is calculated and the harmonic order corresponding to the minimum value is obtained. Finally, the reason why the yield of HHG is low for the case of the molecular axis parallel to the laser polarization direction is different from that for the case of the molecular axis perpendicular to the polarization direction. For the parallel case, the contributions to HHG from the two channels are both small so that the amplitude of their coherent superposition is small. While for the perpendicular case, the individual contribution from each channel is not small but their destructive interference leads to small yield in harmonicspectrum.
      通信作者: 郭迎春, ycguo@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12074418, 11774411)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Guo Ying-Chun, ycguo@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12074418, 11774411).
    [1]

    Skantzakis E, Chatziathanasiou S, Carpeggiani P A, Sansone G, Nayak A, Gray D, Tzallas P, Charalambidis D, Hertz E, Faucher O 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 39295Google Scholar

    [2]

    Popmintchev T, Chen M C, Popmintchev D et al. 2012 Science 336 1287Google Scholar

    [3]

    宋浩, 吕孝源, 朱若碧, 陈高 2019 68 184201Google Scholar

    Song H, Lv X Y, Zhu R B, Chen G 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 184201Google Scholar

    [4]

    Alexander M K, Marcin F, Maciej P, Stoyan K S, Kyle J M B, Bartosz A G 2006 Science 312 420Google Scholar

    [5]

    Itatani J, Levesque J, Zeidler D, Niikura H, Pepin H, Kieffer J C, Corkum P B, Villeneuve D M 2004 Nature 432 867Google Scholar

    [6]

    Torres R, Kajumba N, Underwood J G, Robinson J S, Baker S, Tisch J W G, Nalda R D, Bryan W A, Velotta R, Altucci C, Turcu I C E, Marangos J P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 203007Google Scholar

    [7]

    Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zair A, Siegel T, Sukiasyan S, Risoud F, Brugnera L, Hutchison C, Diveki Z, Auguste T, Tisch J W G, Salieres P, Ivanova M Y, Marangos J P 2013 Chem. Phys. 414 184Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chatziathanasiou S, Liontos I, Skantzakis E, Kahaly S, Kahaly M U, Tsatrafyllis N, Faucher O, Witzel B, Papadakis N, Charalambidis D, Tzallas P 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 061404

    [10]

    Lein M, Hay N, Velotta R, Marangos J P, Knight P L 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023805

    [11]

    Lein M, Hay N, Velotta R, Marangos J P, Knight P L 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 183903Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kanai T, Minemoto S, Sakai H 2005 Nature 435 470Google Scholar

    [13]

    Faria C F D M 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 043407

    [14]

    袁仲, 郭迎春, 王兵兵 2016 65 114205Google Scholar

    Yuan Z, Guo Y C, Wang B B 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 114205Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhou X X, Tong X M, Zhao Z X, Lin C D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 033412

    [16]

    Itatani J, Zeidler D, Levesque J, Spanner M, Villeneuve D M, Corkum P B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 123902Google Scholar

    [17]

    Lewenstein M, Balcou P, Ivanov M Y, Huillier A L, Corkum P B 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 2117

    [18]

    Molpro A Package of Ab Initio Programs, Werner H J, Knowles P J, Lindh R, Manby F R, Schutz M, Celani P, Korona T, Rauhut G, Amos R D, Bernhardsson A, Berning A, Cooper D L, Deegan M J O, Dobbyn A J, Eckert F, Hampel C, Hetzer G, Lloyd A W, McNicholas S J, Meyer W, Mura M E, Nicklass A, Palmieri P http://www.molpro.net/ [2020-12-12]

    [19]

    邓华依, 周效信 2009 原子与分子 26 101Google Scholar

    Deng H Y, Zhou X X 2009 J. At. Mol. Phys. 26 101Google Scholar

    [20]

    李忠元, 郭迎春, 王兵兵 2021 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版) 1 103Google Scholar

    Li Z Y, Guo Y C, Wang B B 2021 Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences) 1 103Google Scholar

    [21]

    Cooper J W 1962 Phys. Rev. 128 681

    [22]

    Carlson T A, Krause M O, Grimm F A, Keller P, Taylor J W 1982 J. Chem. Phys. 77 5340Google Scholar

    [23]

    Worner H J, Niikura H, Bertrand J B, Corkum P B, Villeneuve D M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 103901Google Scholar

    [24]

    Shiner A D, Schmidt B E, Herrero C T, Corkum P B, Kieffer J C, Legare F, Villeneuve D M 2012 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 074010Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wong M C H, Le A T, Alharbi A F, Boguslavskiy A E, Lucchese R R, Brichta J P, Lin C D, Bhardwaj V R 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 033006Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)准直的O2分子与光电场示意图; (b)第一类通道; (c)第二类通道

    Fig. 1.  (a) Aligned O2 molecule and the polarizing electric field of laser; (b) the first type of path; (c) the second type of path.

    图 2  O2分子基态波函数

    Fig. 2.  Wavefunction of ground state of O2.

    图 3  O2在激光偏振与核轴成不同夹角$\theta $下的高次谐波谱, 每幅图中的黑色划线为第一类通道的贡献 $\log |{X_1} + {X_2}{|^2}$; 红色点划线为第二类通道的贡献$\log |{X_3} + {X_4}{|^2}$; 蓝色实线为两类通道叠加的结果 $\log |{X_1} + {X_2} + {X_3} + {X_4}{|^2}$

    Fig. 3.  The HHG spectrum of O2 with different $\theta $ between the polarizing direction of laser electric field and the nuclear axis of O2: In each panel, black dash line is the contribution from the first path $\log |{X_1} + {X_2}{|^2}$, red dot line represent that from the second path$\log |{X_3} + {X_4}{|^2}$, and blue solid line represents the addition of the above two paths $\log |{X_1} + {X_2} + {X_3} + {X_4}{|^2}$.

    图 4  对应不同的核轴和偏振方向的夹角$ \theta $, 两类通道产生的高次谐波的相位差的余弦值随阶次的变化

    Fig. 4.  $\cos (\delta \varphi )$versus harmonic order for different angle $ \theta $ made by nuclear axis and laser polarizing direction, $\delta\varphi $ is the phase difference between HHG from two channels.

    图 5  核轴和偏振方向的夹角 θ 分别为30°(图(a))和45°(图(b))时O2的高次谐波谱, 黑色实线对应的激光强度为$5.18 \times $$ {10^{14}}\, {{\rm{{W/c}}}}{{{{\rm{m}}}}^{{2}}}$, 红色虚线对应$1.036 \times {10^{15}}\, {{\rm{{W/c}}}}{{{\rm{{m}}}}^{{2}}}$

    Fig. 5.  The HHG spectrum of O2 with different $ \theta $ between the polarizing direction of laser electric field and the nuclear axis of O2 , in panel (a) $ \theta $ is 30° and in (b) $ \theta $ is 45°. In each panel, black solid line is for the laser intensity of $5.18 \times {10^{14}}\, {{\rm{{W/c}}}}{{{\rm{{m}}}}^{{2}}}$ and short dash line is for the laser intensity of $1.036 \times {10^{15}}\, {{\rm{{W/c}}}}{{{\rm{{m}}}}^{{2}}}$

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Skantzakis E, Chatziathanasiou S, Carpeggiani P A, Sansone G, Nayak A, Gray D, Tzallas P, Charalambidis D, Hertz E, Faucher O 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 39295Google Scholar

    [2]

    Popmintchev T, Chen M C, Popmintchev D et al. 2012 Science 336 1287Google Scholar

    [3]

    宋浩, 吕孝源, 朱若碧, 陈高 2019 68 184201Google Scholar

    Song H, Lv X Y, Zhu R B, Chen G 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 184201Google Scholar

    [4]

    Alexander M K, Marcin F, Maciej P, Stoyan K S, Kyle J M B, Bartosz A G 2006 Science 312 420Google Scholar

    [5]

    Itatani J, Levesque J, Zeidler D, Niikura H, Pepin H, Kieffer J C, Corkum P B, Villeneuve D M 2004 Nature 432 867Google Scholar

    [6]

    Torres R, Kajumba N, Underwood J G, Robinson J S, Baker S, Tisch J W G, Nalda R D, Bryan W A, Velotta R, Altucci C, Turcu I C E, Marangos J P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 203007Google Scholar

    [7]

    Corkum P B 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zair A, Siegel T, Sukiasyan S, Risoud F, Brugnera L, Hutchison C, Diveki Z, Auguste T, Tisch J W G, Salieres P, Ivanova M Y, Marangos J P 2013 Chem. Phys. 414 184Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chatziathanasiou S, Liontos I, Skantzakis E, Kahaly S, Kahaly M U, Tsatrafyllis N, Faucher O, Witzel B, Papadakis N, Charalambidis D, Tzallas P 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 061404

    [10]

    Lein M, Hay N, Velotta R, Marangos J P, Knight P L 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023805

    [11]

    Lein M, Hay N, Velotta R, Marangos J P, Knight P L 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 183903Google Scholar

    [12]

    Kanai T, Minemoto S, Sakai H 2005 Nature 435 470Google Scholar

    [13]

    Faria C F D M 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 043407

    [14]

    袁仲, 郭迎春, 王兵兵 2016 65 114205Google Scholar

    Yuan Z, Guo Y C, Wang B B 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 114205Google Scholar

    [15]

    Zhou X X, Tong X M, Zhao Z X, Lin C D 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 033412

    [16]

    Itatani J, Zeidler D, Levesque J, Spanner M, Villeneuve D M, Corkum P B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 123902Google Scholar

    [17]

    Lewenstein M, Balcou P, Ivanov M Y, Huillier A L, Corkum P B 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 2117

    [18]

    Molpro A Package of Ab Initio Programs, Werner H J, Knowles P J, Lindh R, Manby F R, Schutz M, Celani P, Korona T, Rauhut G, Amos R D, Bernhardsson A, Berning A, Cooper D L, Deegan M J O, Dobbyn A J, Eckert F, Hampel C, Hetzer G, Lloyd A W, McNicholas S J, Meyer W, Mura M E, Nicklass A, Palmieri P http://www.molpro.net/ [2020-12-12]

    [19]

    邓华依, 周效信 2009 原子与分子 26 101Google Scholar

    Deng H Y, Zhou X X 2009 J. At. Mol. Phys. 26 101Google Scholar

    [20]

    李忠元, 郭迎春, 王兵兵 2021 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版) 1 103Google Scholar

    Li Z Y, Guo Y C, Wang B B 2021 Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences) 1 103Google Scholar

    [21]

    Cooper J W 1962 Phys. Rev. 128 681

    [22]

    Carlson T A, Krause M O, Grimm F A, Keller P, Taylor J W 1982 J. Chem. Phys. 77 5340Google Scholar

    [23]

    Worner H J, Niikura H, Bertrand J B, Corkum P B, Villeneuve D M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 103901Google Scholar

    [24]

    Shiner A D, Schmidt B E, Herrero C T, Corkum P B, Kieffer J C, Legare F, Villeneuve D M 2012 J. Phys. B:At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 45 074010Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wong M C H, Le A T, Alharbi A F, Boguslavskiy A E, Lucchese R R, Brichta J P, Lin C D, Bhardwaj V R 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 033006Google Scholar

  • [1] 张春艳. H离子团簇高次谐波平台展宽与团簇膨胀.  , 2023, 72(21): 214203. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230534
    [2] 申开波, 刘英光, 李鑫, 李亨宣. 石墨烯纳米网中的声子干涉效应.  , 2023, 72(12): 123102. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230361
    [3] 于术娟, 刘竹琴, 李雁鹏. 对称分子${\text{H}}_{\text{2}}^{\text{ + }}$在强短波激光场中高次谐波椭偏率性质的研究.  , 2023, 72(4): 043101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221946
    [4] 程桐, 杨天悦, 宫廷, 郭古青, 邱选兵, 李传亮, 赵刚, 马维光. 光学反馈腔增强吸收光谱技术中干涉抑制方法.  , 2022, 71(6): 064205. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211882
    [5] 杨艳, 张斌, 任仲雪, 白光如, 刘璐, 赵增秀. 极性分子CO高次谐波产生过程中的不对称性.  , 2022, 71(23): 234204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221714
    [6] 姚惠东, 崔波, 马思琦, 余超, 陆瑞锋. 原子错位堆栈增强双层MoS2高次谐波产率.  , 2021, 70(13): 134207. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210731
    [7] 范鑫, 梁红静, 单立宇, 闫博, 高庆华, 马日, 丁大军. 基于高次谐波产生的极紫外偏振涡旋光.  , 2020, 69(4): 044203. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20190834
    [8] 管仲, 李伟, 王国利, 周效信. 激光驱动晶体发射高次谐波的特性研究.  , 2016, 65(6): 063201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.063201
    [9] 罗香怡, 刘海凤, 贲帅, 刘学深. 非均匀激光场中氢分子离子高次谐波的增强.  , 2016, 65(12): 123201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.123201
    [10] 李贵花, 谢红强, 姚金平, 储蔚, 程亚, 柳晓军, 陈京, 谢新华. 中红外飞秒激光场中氮分子高次谐波的多轨道干涉特性研究.  , 2016, 65(22): 224208. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.224208
    [11] 余朝, 孙真荣, 郭东升. 高次谐波的Guo-Åberg-Crasemann理论及其截断定律.  , 2015, 64(12): 124207. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.124207
    [12] 李雁鹏, 于术娟, 陈彦军. 不同取向角下CO2分子波长依赖的垂直谐波效率.  , 2015, 64(18): 183102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.183102
    [13] 陈高, 杨玉军, 郭福明. 晶体环境下高次谐波谱的截止频率分析.  , 2013, 62(8): 083202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.083202
    [14] 李小刚, 李芳, 何志聪. 双色场驱动下高次谐波的径向量子轨道干涉.  , 2013, 62(8): 087201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.087201
    [15] 郭福明, 陈基根, 杨玉军, 曾思良. 相对论质量修正效应对超高次谐波的影响.  , 2012, 61(17): 173202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.173202
    [16] 崔磊, 王小娟, 王帆, 曾祥华. 脉冲激光偏振方向对氧分子高次谐波的影响——基于含时密度泛函理论的模拟.  , 2010, 59(1): 317-321. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.317
    [17] 李会山, 李鹏程, 周效信. 强激光场中模型氢原子的势函数对产生高次谐波强度的影响.  , 2009, 58(11): 7633-7639. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.7633
    [18] 顾 斌, 崔 磊, 曾祥华, 张丰收. 超强飞秒激光脉冲作用下氢分子的高次谐波行为——基于含时密度泛函理论的模拟.  , 2006, 55(6): 2972-2976. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2972
    [19] 崔 磊, 顾 斌, 滕玉永, 胡永金, 赵 江, 曾祥华. 脉冲激光偏振方向对氮分子高次谐波的影响--基于含时密度泛函理论的模拟.  , 2006, 55(9): 4691-4694. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4691
    [20] 王大威, 刘婷婷, 杨宏, 蒋红兵, 龚旗煌. 介质的非均匀性对高次谐波影响的研究.  , 2002, 51(9): 2034-2037. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2034
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4522
  • PDF下载量:  68
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-06
  • 修回日期:  2021-04-27
  • 上网日期:  2021-10-09
  • 刊出日期:  2021-10-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map