搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

13.56 MHz/2 MHz柱状感性耦合等离子体参数的对比研究

张改玲 滑跃 郝泽宇 任春生

引用本文:
Citation:

13.56 MHz/2 MHz柱状感性耦合等离子体参数的对比研究

张改玲, 滑跃, 郝泽宇, 任春生

Experimental investigation of plasma parameters in 13.56 MHz/2 MHz cylindrical inductively coupled plasma

Zhang Gai-Ling, Hua Yue, Hao Ze-Yu, Ren Chun-Sheng
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 通过Langmuir双探针和发射光谱诊断方法, 对比研究了驱动频率为13.56 MHz和2 MHz柱状感性耦合等离子体中电子密度和电子温度的径向分布规律. 结果表明: 在高频和低频放电中, 输入功率的增加对等离子体参数产生了不同的影响, 高频放电中主要提升了电子密度, 低频放电中则主要提升了电子温度. 固定气压为10 Pa, 分别由高频和低频驱动时, 电子密度的径向分布均为“凸型”. 而电子温度的分布差异比较明显, 高频驱动时, 电子温度在腔室中心较为平坦, 在边缘略有上升; 低频驱动时, 电子温度随径向距离的增加而逐渐下降. 为了进一步分析造成这种差异的原因, 在相同放电条件下采集了氩等离子体的发射光谱图, 利用分支比法计算了亚稳态粒子的数密度, 发现电子温度的径向分布始终与亚稳态粒子的径向分布相反. 继续升高气压到100 Pa, 发现不论高频还是低频放电, 电子密度的径向分布均从“凸型”转变为“马鞍形”, 较低气压时电子密度的均匀性有了一定的提升, 但低频的均匀性更好.
    Inductively coupled plasmais widely used in semiconductor and display process because of its desirable characteristics such as high plasma density, simple structure and independently controllable ion energy. The driving frequency is a significant parameter that generates and maintains the plasma. However, the effects of different driving frequencies on the radial distribution of the plasma parameters are hardly investigated. So a large area cylindrical inductively coupled plasma source driven separately by 2 MHz and 13.56 MHz is investigated. In order to perform a comprehensive investigation about the effect of driving frequency, the radially resolved measurements of electron density, electron temperature and density of metastable state atoms for the argon discharge are systematically analyzed by Langmuir double probe and optical emission spectroscopy at various power values and gas pressures. It is found that input power values at high frequency (13.56 MHz) and low frequency (2 MHz) have different effects on plasma parameters. When discharge is driven at high frequency, the electron density increases obviously with the increase of power. However, when discharge is driven at low frequency, the electron temperature increases evidently with the increase of power. This can be explained by calculating the skin depths in high and low frequency discharge. When the discharge is driven at high frequency, the induced electromagnetic field is higher than that at low frequency, and the single electron obtains more energy. It is easier to ionize, so the energy is mainly used to increase the electron density. When the discharge is driven at low frequency, the skin layer is thicker, the number of heated electrons is larger, and the average energy of electrons is increased, so the energy is mainly used to raise the electron temperature. At a gas pressure of 10 Pa, the electron density shows a ‘convex’ distribution and increases with the increase of input power for both the high-frequency and low-frequency discharge. While the distributions of electron temperature are obviously different. When the discharge is driven at high frequency, the electron temperature is relatively flat in the center of the chamber and slightly increases on the edge. When the discharge is driven at low frequency, the electron temperature gradually decreases along the radial position. This is due to the one-step ionization in the high-frequency discharge and the two-step ionization in the low-frequency discharge. In order to prove that the low-frequency discharge is dominated by two-step ionization, the spectral intensities of the argon plasma under the same discharge conditions are diagnosed by optical emission spectroscopy. The number density of metastable states is calculated by the branch ratio method. The results are consistent with the analyses. At a gas pressure of 100 Pa, the electron density increases and then decreases with the increase of radial distance, and the overall distribution shows a " saddle shape” for high frequency and also for low frequency discharge. Although the uniformity of electron density improves with the gas pressure, the uniformity at low frequency is better than that at high frequency. The reason can be attributed to the fact that the skin layer of low frequency is thicker and the heating area is wider.
      通信作者: 任春生, rchsh@dlut.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11475038)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Ren Chun-Sheng, rchsh@dlut.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11475038).
    [1]

    迈克尔A.力伯曼, 阿伦J.里登伯格 著(蒲以康 译) 2004 等离子体放电原理与材料处理(北京: 科学出版社)第1−19页

    Lieberman M A, Lichtenberg A J(translated by Pu Y K) 2004 Principles of Plasma Discharge and Materials Processing (Beijing: Science Press) pp1−19 (in Chinese)

    [2]

    帕斯卡 夏伯特 著(王友年 译) 2015 射频等离子体物理学(北京: 科学出版社)第1−15页

    Chabert P(translated by Wang Y N) 2015 Physics of Radio-Frequency Plasmas (Beijing: Science Press) pp1−15 (in Chinese)

    [3]

    Xu S, Ostrikov K N, Li Y, Tsakadze E L, Jones I R 2000 Phys. Plasmas 45 20

    [4]

    Saehoon U, Kyong-Ho L, Chang H Y, Chung C W 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 4830Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kim J H, Hwang H J, Kim D H, Cho J H, Chung C W 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 153302Google Scholar

    [6]

    丁振峰, 袁国玉, 高巍, 孙景超 2007 57 4304

    Ding Z F, Yuan G Y, Gao W, Sun J C 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4304

    [7]

    高飞 2011 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Gao F 2011 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [8]

    赵书霞 2011 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Zhao S X 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [9]

    Godyak V A, Alexandrovich B M 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 3553Google Scholar

    [10]

    Lee H C, Chung C W 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 053505Google Scholar

    [11]

    Lee H C, Chung C W 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 101607Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jun H S, Chang H Y 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 041501

    [13]

    Gao F, Zhang Y R, Li H, Liu Y, Wang Y N 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 073508Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu F, Ren C S, Wang Y N, Qi X L, Ma T C 2006 Vacuum 81 221Google Scholar

    [15]

    Hua Y, Song J, Hao Z Y 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 065402Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hua Y, Song J, Hao Z Y, Zhang G L 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 014005Google Scholar

    [17]

    刘耀泽 2016 硕士学位论文(哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)

    Liu Y Z 2016 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [18]

    张健 2006 硕士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Zhang J 2006 M. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [19]

    齐雪莲 2008 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Qi X L 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [20]

    Daltrini A M, Moshkalev S A, Monteiro M J R, Besseler E, Kostryukov A 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 073309Google Scholar

    [21]

    Moshkalev S A, Steen P G, Gomez S, Graham W G 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 328Google Scholar

    [22]

    韩雪 2015 硕士学位论文(哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)

    Han X 2015 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [23]

    Daltrini A M, Moshkalev S A,Morgan T J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 061504Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhu X M, Pu Y K 2010 J. Phys. D 43 015204Google Scholar

    [25]

    Czerwiec T,Graves D B 2004 J. Phys. D 37 2827Google Scholar

    [26]

    刘阳 2017 硕士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Liu Y 2017 M. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [27]

    Li H, Liu Y, Zhang Y R, Gao F, Wang Y N 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 23302Google Scholar

    [28]

    Lee H C, Seo B H, Kwon D C, Kim J H, Seong D J, Oh S J, Chung C W, You K H, Shin C H 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 014106Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lee H C 2018 Phys. Plasmas 5 011108Google Scholar

    [30]

    Lee H C, Lee M H, Chung C W 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 041503Google Scholar

    [31]

    Setsuhara Y, Tsukiyama D, Takenaka K 2008 Surface & Coatings Technology 202 5238

  • 图 1  柱状感性耦合等离子体源的实验装置图

    Fig. 1.  A schematic diagram of the cylindrical inductively coupled plasma reactor.

    图 2  频率为13.56 MHz, 气压为10 Pa, 输入功率为400 W, 腔室中心(r = 0 cm)处氩等离子体发射光谱全谱

    Fig. 2.  Argon plasma emission spectroscopy at 10 Pa for 13.56 MHz radio-frequency discharge. The radio-frequency power is fixed at 400 W and the measurement plane is r = 0 cm.

    图 3  气压为10 Pa时, 在z = 10 cm, r = 0 cm处, 13.56 MHz/2 MHz放电中等离子体参数随功率的变化 (a)电子密度; (b)电子温度

    Fig. 3.  (a) The electron density and (b) electron temperature of 13.56 MHz/2 MHz discharge at different power. The gas pressure is fixed at 10 Pa and the measurement position is z = 10 cm, r = 0 cm.

    图 4  气压为10 Pa时, 13.56 MHz/2 MHz放电中趋肤深度随功率的变化

    Fig. 4.  The skin depth versus input power for 13.56 MHz/2 MHz discharge at 10 Pa.

    图 5  气压为10 Pa时, z = 10 cm处, 13.56 MHz/2 MHz放电中电子密度的径向分布 (a)高频13.56 MHz; (b)低频2 MHz

    Fig. 5.  The radial distribution profiles of electron density for (a) 13.56 MHz and (b) 2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 10 Pa and the measurement plane is z = 10 cm.

    图 6  气压为10 Pa时, 高低频放电中电子温度的径向分布 (a)高频13.56 MHz; (b)低频2 MHz

    Fig. 6.  The radial distribution profiles of electron temperature for (a) 13.56 MHz and (b) 2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 10 Pa and the measurement plane is z = 10 cm.

    图 7  气压为10 Pa时, 高低频放电中亚稳态的径向分布 (a)高频13.56 MHz; (b)低频2 MHz

    Fig. 7.  The radial distribution profiles of metastable states for (a) 13.56 MHz and (b) 2 MHz discharge at 10 Pa.

    图 8  气压为100 Pa时高低频放电中电子密度的径向分布 (a)频率为13.56 MHz; (b)频率为2 MHz

    Fig. 8.  The radial distribution profiles of electron density (a) 13.56 MHz and (b) 2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 100 Pa and the measurement plane is z = 10 cm.

    图 9  气压为10 Pa和100 Pa时, 在z = 10 cm处, 高低频放电中径向不均匀度随功率的变化

    Fig. 9.  Thenonuniformity at different power for 13.56 MHz/2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 10 Pa and 100 Pa, the measurement plane is z = 10 cm.

    图 10  气压为10 Pa和100 Pa时, 13.56 MHz/2 MHz放电中电子能量弛豫长度随功率的变化

    Fig. 10.  The electron energy relaxation length versus input power for 13.56 MHz/2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 10 Pa and 100 Pa.

    图 11  气压为100 Pa时高低频放电中电子温度的径向分布 (a)高频13.56 MHz; (b)低频2 MHz

    Fig. 11.  The radial distribution profiles of electron temperature (a) 13.56 MHz and (b) 2 MHz discharge. The gas pressure is fixed at 100 Pa and the measurement plane is z = 10 cm.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    迈克尔A.力伯曼, 阿伦J.里登伯格 著(蒲以康 译) 2004 等离子体放电原理与材料处理(北京: 科学出版社)第1−19页

    Lieberman M A, Lichtenberg A J(translated by Pu Y K) 2004 Principles of Plasma Discharge and Materials Processing (Beijing: Science Press) pp1−19 (in Chinese)

    [2]

    帕斯卡 夏伯特 著(王友年 译) 2015 射频等离子体物理学(北京: 科学出版社)第1−15页

    Chabert P(translated by Wang Y N) 2015 Physics of Radio-Frequency Plasmas (Beijing: Science Press) pp1−15 (in Chinese)

    [3]

    Xu S, Ostrikov K N, Li Y, Tsakadze E L, Jones I R 2000 Phys. Plasmas 45 20

    [4]

    Saehoon U, Kyong-Ho L, Chang H Y, Chung C W 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 4830Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kim J H, Hwang H J, Kim D H, Cho J H, Chung C W 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 153302Google Scholar

    [6]

    丁振峰, 袁国玉, 高巍, 孙景超 2007 57 4304

    Ding Z F, Yuan G Y, Gao W, Sun J C 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4304

    [7]

    高飞 2011 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Gao F 2011 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [8]

    赵书霞 2011 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Zhao S X 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [9]

    Godyak V A, Alexandrovich B M 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 3553Google Scholar

    [10]

    Lee H C, Chung C W 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 053505Google Scholar

    [11]

    Lee H C, Chung C W 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 101607Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jun H S, Chang H Y 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 041501

    [13]

    Gao F, Zhang Y R, Li H, Liu Y, Wang Y N 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 073508Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu F, Ren C S, Wang Y N, Qi X L, Ma T C 2006 Vacuum 81 221Google Scholar

    [15]

    Hua Y, Song J, Hao Z Y 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 065402Google Scholar

    [16]

    Hua Y, Song J, Hao Z Y, Zhang G L 2018 Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 014005Google Scholar

    [17]

    刘耀泽 2016 硕士学位论文(哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)

    Liu Y Z 2016 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [18]

    张健 2006 硕士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Zhang J 2006 M. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [19]

    齐雪莲 2008 博士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Qi X L 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [20]

    Daltrini A M, Moshkalev S A, Monteiro M J R, Besseler E, Kostryukov A 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 073309Google Scholar

    [21]

    Moshkalev S A, Steen P G, Gomez S, Graham W G 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 328Google Scholar

    [22]

    韩雪 2015 硕士学位论文(哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)

    Han X 2015 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [23]

    Daltrini A M, Moshkalev S A,Morgan T J 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 061504Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhu X M, Pu Y K 2010 J. Phys. D 43 015204Google Scholar

    [25]

    Czerwiec T,Graves D B 2004 J. Phys. D 37 2827Google Scholar

    [26]

    刘阳 2017 硕士学位论文(大连: 大连理工大学)

    Liu Y 2017 M. S. Thesis (Dalian: Dalian University of Technology) (in Chinese)

    [27]

    Li H, Liu Y, Zhang Y R, Gao F, Wang Y N 2017 J. Appl. Phys. 121 23302Google Scholar

    [28]

    Lee H C, Seo B H, Kwon D C, Kim J H, Seong D J, Oh S J, Chung C W, You K H, Shin C H 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 014106Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lee H C 2018 Phys. Plasmas 5 011108Google Scholar

    [30]

    Lee H C, Lee M H, Chung C W 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 041503Google Scholar

    [31]

    Setsuhara Y, Tsukiyama D, Takenaka K 2008 Surface & Coatings Technology 202 5238

  • [1] 漆亮文, 杜满强, 温晓东, 宋健, 闫慧杰. 同轴枪放电等离子体动力学与杂质谱特性.  , 2024, 73(18): 185203. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240760
    [2] 佟磊, 赵明亮, 张钰如, 宋远红, 王友年. 带有射频偏压源的感性耦合Ar/O2/Cl2等离子体放电的混合模拟研究.  , 2024, 73(4): 045201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231369
    [3] 赵明亮, 邢思雨, 唐雯, 张钰如, 高飞, 王友年. 面向半导体工艺的平面线圈感性耦合氩等离子体源的三维流体模拟研究.  , 2024, 73(21): 215201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240952
    [4] 张雨涵, 赵欣茜, 梁英爽, 郭媛媛. 感性耦合Ar/O2等离子体放电特性的数值模拟.  , 2024, 73(13): 135201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240436
    [5] 张雪雪, 贾鹏英, 冉俊霞, 李金懋, 孙换霞, 李雪辰. 辅助放电下刷状空气等离子体羽的放电特性和参数诊断.  , 2024, 73(8): 085201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231946
    [6] 朱海龙, 师玉军, 王嘉伟, 张志凌, 高一宁, 张丰博. 高气压氩气辉光放电条纹等离子体的形成和演化.  , 2022, 71(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212394
    [7] 杨丽君, 宋彩虹, 赵娜, 周帅, 武珈存, 贾鹏英. 大气压氩气刷形等离子体羽的特性研究.  , 2021, 70(15): 155201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202091
    [8] 张钰如, 高飞, 王友年. 低气压感性耦合等离子体源模拟研究进展.  , 2021, 70(9): 095206. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202247
    [9] 杜永权, 刘文耀, 朱爱民, 李小松, 赵天亮, 刘永新, 高飞, 徐勇, 王友年. 双频容性耦合等离子体相分辨发射光谱诊断.  , 2013, 62(20): 205208. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.205208
    [10] 陈维, 黄骏, 李辉, 吕国华, 王兴权, 张国平, 王鹏业, 杨思泽. 氦-氧等离子体针灭活肺癌A549细胞.  , 2012, 61(18): 185203. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.185203
    [11] 高著秀, 冯春华, 杨宣宗, 黄建国, 韩建伟. 微小碎片加速器同轴枪内等离子体轴向速度研究.  , 2012, 61(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.145201
    [12] 李雪辰, 袁宁, 贾鹏英, 常媛媛, 嵇亚飞. 大气压等离子体针产生空气均匀放电特性研究.  , 2011, 60(12): 125204. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.125204
    [13] 倪明江, 余量, 李晓东, 屠昕, 汪宇, 严建华. 大气压直流滑动弧等离子体工作特性研究.  , 2011, 60(1): 015101. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.015101
    [14] 蒲昱东, 杨家敏, 靳奉涛, 张璐, 丁永坤. 辐射输运实验中的Al等离子体发射光谱研究.  , 2011, 60(4): 045210. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.045210
    [15] 朱竹青, 王晓雷. 飞秒激光空气等离子体发射光谱的实验研究.  , 2011, 60(8): 085205. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.085205
    [16] 高勋, 宋晓伟, 郭凯敏, 陶海岩, 林景全. 飞秒激光烧蚀硅表面产生等离子体的发射光谱研究.  , 2011, 60(2): 025203. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025203
    [17] 刘莉莹, 张家良, 郭卿超, 王德真. 大气压等离子体辅助多晶硅薄膜化学气相沉积参数诊断.  , 2010, 59(4): 2653-2660. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2653
    [18] 唐京武, 黄笃之, 易有根. Au激光等离子体X射线发射光谱的理论研究.  , 2010, 59(11): 7769-7774. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7769
    [19] 牛田野, 曹金祥, 刘 磊, 刘金英, 王 艳, 王 亮, 吕 铀, 王 舸, 朱 颖. 低温氩等离子体中的单探针和发射光谱诊断技术.  , 2007, 56(4): 2330-2336. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2330
    [20] 黄 松, 辛 煜, 宁兆元. 使用发射光谱对感应耦合CF4/CH4等离子体中C2基团形成机理的研究.  , 2005, 54(4): 1653-1658. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1653
计量
  • 文章访问数:  9184
  • PDF下载量:  150
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-01-14
  • 修回日期:  2019-03-20
  • 上网日期:  2019-05-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-05-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map