磁性应力监测中力磁耦合特征及关键影响因素分析

章鹏; 刘琳; 陈伟民

doi:10.7498/aps.62.177501

摘要

针对磁性应力监测研究中力磁耦合关系有多种变化趋势且一直没有合理理论解释这一问题, 从磁性材料的微观磁畴运动出发, 根据磁致磁化过程, 详细分析了两种不同磁化状态下力致磁化的变化规律, 揭示出力磁耦合关系的变化特征, 进而提出磁化状态是导致力磁耦合关系差异的本质因素; 对工程上实际缆索用镀锌钢丝在不同磁化状态下进行了力磁耦合试验, 结果与理论一致: 力磁耦合关系随磁化状态的不同而不同, 本质上有效地解释了已有研究中力磁耦合关系的矛盾多样性.

关键词:

Abstract

Until recently the magnetomechanical behavior has been rather poorly understood with contradictory results and interpretations from different investigators in the study of stress monitoring by magnetic method. Based on the domain motion and field-induced magnetization process of magnetic material, the stress-induced magnetization process in two different magnetization states is analyzed in detail. Characteristics of the magnetomechanical behavior are revealed. Domain motion caused by stress always makes materials tend to stable state of free energy minimum and accordingly the magnetization will approach the anhysterestic magnetization. Moreover, it can be concluded that magnetization state is an essential factor influencing the magnetomechanical behavior. Experiments of magnetomechanical behavior for galvanized steel wire have been conducted for different magnetization state, and the results are in accord with the theoretical analyses. The magnetomechanical behavior is changed with magnetization state, which can be effectively used to explain the existing complex and diverse research results.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
重庆大学光电工程学院, 光电技术及系统教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400044

基金项目: 中央高校基本科研业务费(批准号: CDJXS11122218, CDJZR10120004)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Key Lab. for Optoelectronic Technology & Systems of Ministry of Education, Chongqing 400044, China

Funds: Project supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant Nos. CDJXS11122218, CDJZR10120004).

参考文献

[1]	Li K, Ju Y, Han J, Zhou C 2009 Mater. Struct. 42 923
[2]	Ko J M, Ni Y Q 2005 Eng. Struct. 27 1715
[3]	Kvasnica B, Fabo P 1996 Meas. Sci. Technol. 7 763
[4]	Sumitro S, Kurokawa S, Shimano K, Wang M L 2005 Smart. Mater. Struct. 14 68
[5]	Atherton D L, Coathup L W, Jiles D C 1983 IEEE. T. Magn. 19 1564
[6]	Wang G D, Wang M L, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Sun B N 2005 Proceedings of SPIE: Smart Structures and Materials-Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems San Diego, United States, March 7-10,2005 p 395
[7]	Sumitro S, Wang M L 2005 Struct. Control. Hlth. 12 445
[8]	Wichmann H J, Holst A, Budelmann H 2009 Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering Nantes, France, June 30-July 3
[9]	Liu L, Chen W M, Liu X M, Zhang P 2012 Adv. Sci. Lett. 11 295
[10]	Wang W 2005 Ph.D. dissertation (Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology) (in chinese) [王威 2005 博士学位论文 (西安: 西安建筑科技大学)]
[11]	Guo Z Z, Hu X B 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 057501 (in Chinese) [郭子政, 胡旭波 2013 62 057501]
[12]	Singh V, Lloyd G M, Wang M L 2004 NDT & E. Int. 27 525
[13]	Tang D D, Huang S L, Chen W M, Jiang J S 2008 Smart. Mater. Struct. 17 19
[14]	Zhang P, Liu X L, Chen W M, Liu L 2010 J. Sci. Instrum. 31 2467 (in Chinese) [章鹏, 刘小亮, 陈伟民, 刘琳 2010 仪器仪表学报 31 2467]
[15]	Xia A L, Fang Y K, Guo Z H, Li W, Han B S 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 1289
[16]	Wang M L, Chen Z L, Koontz S S, Lloyd G M 2000 Proceedings of SPIE: Non-destructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities and Pipelines Newport Beach, United State, March 5-9, 2000 p492
[17]	Lloyd G M, Singh V, Wang M L, Hovorka O 2003 IEEE. Sens. J. 3 708
[18]	Jarosevic A 1998 Smart Struct. Syst. 35 107
[19]	Jiles D C 1991 Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials (London, UK: Chapman and hall) pp69-98
[20]	Liorzou F, Phelps B, Atherton D L 2000 IEEE. T. Magn. 36 418
[21]	Jiles D C 1995 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 28 1537

施引文献

[1]	Li K, Ju Y, Han J, Zhou C 2009 Mater. Struct. 42 923
[2]	Ko J M, Ni Y Q 2005 Eng. Struct. 27 1715
[3]	Kvasnica B, Fabo P 1996 Meas. Sci. Technol. 7 763
[4]	Sumitro S, Kurokawa S, Shimano K, Wang M L 2005 Smart. Mater. Struct. 14 68
[5]	Atherton D L, Coathup L W, Jiles D C 1983 IEEE. T. Magn. 19 1564
[6]	Wang G D, Wang M L, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Sun B N 2005 Proceedings of SPIE: Smart Structures and Materials-Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems San Diego, United States, March 7-10,2005 p 395
[7]	Sumitro S, Wang M L 2005 Struct. Control. Hlth. 12 445
[8]	Wichmann H J, Holst A, Budelmann H 2009 Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering Nantes, France, June 30-July 3
[9]	Liu L, Chen W M, Liu X M, Zhang P 2012 Adv. Sci. Lett. 11 295
[10]	Wang W 2005 Ph.D. dissertation (Xi’an: Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology) (in chinese) [王威 2005 博士学位论文 (西安: 西安建筑科技大学)]
[11]	Guo Z Z, Hu X B 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 057501 (in Chinese) [郭子政, 胡旭波 2013 62 057501]
[12]	Singh V, Lloyd G M, Wang M L 2004 NDT & E. Int. 27 525
[13]	Tang D D, Huang S L, Chen W M, Jiang J S 2008 Smart. Mater. Struct. 17 19
[14]	Zhang P, Liu X L, Chen W M, Liu L 2010 J. Sci. Instrum. 31 2467 (in Chinese) [章鹏, 刘小亮, 陈伟民, 刘琳 2010 仪器仪表学报 31 2467]
[15]	Xia A L, Fang Y K, Guo Z H, Li W, Han B S 2006 Chin. Phys. Lett. 23 1289
[16]	Wang M L, Chen Z L, Koontz S S, Lloyd G M 2000 Proceedings of SPIE: Non-destructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities and Pipelines Newport Beach, United State, March 5-9, 2000 p492
[17]	Lloyd G M, Singh V, Wang M L, Hovorka O 2003 IEEE. Sens. J. 3 708
[18]	Jarosevic A 1998 Smart Struct. Syst. 35 107
[19]	Jiles D C 1991 Introduction to magnetism and magnetic materials (London, UK: Chapman and hall) pp69-98
[20]	Liorzou F, Phelps B, Atherton D L 2000 IEEE. T. Magn. 36 418
[21]	Jiles D C 1995 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 28 1537

[1]	罗旭, 王丽红, 吕良, 曹书峰, 董学成, 赵建国. 基于面磁荷密度的金属磁记忆检测正演模型. , 2022, 71(15): 154101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220176
[2]	时朋朋, 郝帅. 磁记忆检测的力磁耦合型磁偶极子理论及解析解. , 2021, 70(3): 034101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200937
[3]	罗旭, 朱海燕, 丁雅萍. 基于力磁耦合效应的铁磁材料修正磁化模型. , 2019, 68(18): 187501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190765
[4]	郝俊祥, 杨青慧, 张怀武, 文岐业, 白飞明, 钟智勇, 贾利军马博, 吴玉娟. 晶格失配应力对单晶(BiTm)3(GaFe)5O12膜磁畴结构的影响. , 2018, 67(11): 117801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180192
[5]	刘娟, 胡锐, 范志强, 张振华. 过渡金属掺杂的扶手椅型氮化硼纳米带的磁电子学特性及力-磁耦合效应. , 2017, 66(23): 238501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.238501
[6]	张楠, 张保, 杨美音, 蔡凯明, 盛宇, 李予才, 邓永城, 王开友. 电学方法调控磁化翻转和磁畴壁运动的研究进展. , 2017, 66(2): 027501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.027501
[7]	刘清友, 罗旭, 朱海燕, 韩一维, 刘建勋. 基于Jiles-Atherton理论的铁磁材料塑性变形磁化模型修正. , 2017, 66(10): 107501. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.107501
[8]	王宏明, 朱弋, 李桂荣, 郑瑞. 强磁与应力场耦合作用下AZ31镁合金塑性变形行为. , 2016, 65(14): 146101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.146101
[9]	杨晓阔, 张斌, 崔焕卿, 李伟伟, 王森. 基于多铁逻辑的铁磁耦合互连线磁化动态模拟. , 2016, 65(23): 237502. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.237502
[10]	张志东. 磁性材料的磁结构、磁畴结构和拓扑磁结构. , 2015, 64(6): 067503. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.067503
[11]	朱洁, 苏垣昌, 潘靖, 封国林. 高斯型非均匀应力对铁磁薄膜磁化性质的影响. , 2013, 62(16): 167503. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.167503
[12]	朱金荣, 香妹, 胡经国. 铁磁/反铁磁双层膜系统中的磁畴动力学行为. , 2012, 61(18): 187504. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.187504
[13]	郭光华, 张光富, 王希光. 反铁磁耦合硬磁-软磁-硬磁三层膜体系的不可逆交换弹性反磁化过程. , 2011, 60(10): 107503. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.107503
[14]	张辉, 曾德长, 刘仲武. 压应力对Fe0.81 Ga0.19单晶磁化和磁致伸缩的影响. , 2011, 60(6): 067503. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.067503
[15]	胡云志, 孙会元. 面内场对三类硬磁畴的影响. , 2009, 58(2): 1242-1245. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1242
[16]	高瑞鑫, 徐振, 陈达鑫, 徐初东, 陈志峰, 刘晓东, 周仕明, 赖天树. GdFeCo磁光薄膜中RE-TM反铁磁耦合与激光感应超快磁化翻转动力学研究. , 2009, 58(1): 580-584. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.580
[17]	聂向富, 唐贵德, 牛秀德, 韩宝善. 三类硬磁畴的形成及静态特性. , 1990, 39(2): 296-301. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.296
[18]	阎凤利, 李伯臧. 管状和闭合磁畴壁的拓扑分类. , 1988, 37(1): 95-104. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.95
[19]	曾文光, 张进修. 磁畴壁在复合外场中的运动方程及其在磁弹性内耗的应用. , 1987, 36(1): 37-46. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.37
[20]	李靖元. 磁泡材料的磁滞迴线和泡阵磁畴的剩磁. , 1982, 31(6): 758-763. doi: 10.7498/aps.31.758

计量

文章访问数: 7107
PDF下载量: 903
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板