搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

碱土和过渡金属掺杂NdAlO3导电陶瓷的制备、结构与电性能研究

向军 郭银涛 周广振 褚艳秋

引用本文:
Citation:

碱土和过渡金属掺杂NdAlO3导电陶瓷的制备、结构与电性能研究

向军, 郭银涛, 周广振, 褚艳秋

Preparation, structures and electrical properties of alkaline earth and transition metal-doped NdAlO3 conducting ceramics

Xiang Jun, Guo Yin-Tao, Zhou Guang-Zhen, Chu Yan-Qiu
PDF
导出引用
  • 采用有机凝胶法结合后期高温烧结制备了较为致密的六方钙钛矿结构 Nd0.9Sr0.1Al1-xMxO3-δ (M = Co, Fe, Mn; x = 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.5)系列陶瓷, 详细研究了过渡金属元素及掺杂量对其结构特征和电性能的影响. 结果表明, 凝胶前驱体在900 ℃焙烧 5 h可制得结晶良好且粒径较为细小的钙钛矿结构精细粉体, 陶瓷体的晶格参数随过渡金属含量x的增加而增大, 且按Co, Mn, Fe顺序递增; 所有陶瓷样品在空气气氛中都是氧离子与电子空穴的混合导体, 碱土金属Sr单掺杂NdAlO3的氧离子迁移数由500 ℃时的0.32单调增加到 850 ℃时的0.63, 其电导率随温度的升高由以电子电导为主逐渐转变为以离子电导为主; 而Sr与过渡金属共掺杂样品的氧离子迁移数均在0.001以下, 其电导率主要取决于p型电导, 且随x的增加而增大, 并按Mn, Fe, Co顺序递增, 相应活化能的变化刚好与之相反, 在所制备的样品中Nd0.9Sr0.1Al0.5Co0.5O3-δ 具有最高的电导率(800 ℃时达到100.8 S/cm)和最低的表观活化能(0.135 eV). 在结构和电性能上所观察到的这些变化行为可根据掺杂过渡金属Co, Fe, Mn的离子半径及其金属-氧(M—O)键的键能和共价性的不同来进行解释.
    Novel Nd0.9Sr0.1Al1-xMxO3-δ (M = Co, Fe, Mn; x =0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.5) conducting ceramics each with a hexagonal perovskite structure are prepared using organic-gel method combined with subsequent high temperature sintering. The influences of transition elements (Co, Fe, and Mn) and their dosages on the structure characteristics and electrical properties are investigated in detail. The experimental results reveal that well-crystallized Nd0.9Sr0.1Al1-xMxO3-δ perovskite oxide ultrafine powders can be obtained by calcining the gel precursors at 900 ℃ for 5 h. The lattice parameters of sintered ceramics increase with the increase of transition metal content (x), and they increase according to the order of Co, Mn, and Fe. All the samples are mixed conductors of oxygen ions and holes in air, and the oxygen ion transport number is enhanced monotonically from 0.32 at 500 ℃ to 0.63 at 850 ℃ for NdAlO3-δ ceramic single-doped with alkaline earth metal Sr, indicating that this material has an electronic-to-ionic dominant transition in electrical conductivity with measurement temperature increasing. Whereas the oxygen ion transport numbers are all below 0.001 for the samples co-doped with Sr and transition metals (Co, Fe, and Mn), and their electrical conductivities are absolutely dominated by p-type conduction. It is found that the conductivity values increase with the increase of x value, and they increase according to the order of Mn, Fe, and Co, while the change of corresponding apparent activation energies is just the opposite. Nd0.9Sr0.1Al0.5Co0.5O3-δ ceramic has the highest electrical conductivity, ~100.8 S/cm at 800 ℃, and the lowest apparent activation energy (0.135 eV) in all the synthesized samples. The observed changes in structure and electrical property in this study can be explained on the basis of the difference in ionic radii among the doped transition metals as well as the differences in bond energies and covalencies among the M-O bonds.
    • 基金项目: 江苏省青蓝工程和江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划(批准号: CXLX11-0293)资助的课题.
    • Funds: Project supported by the Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province, China, and the Program for Postgraduates Research Innovation in University of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. CXLX11-0293).
    [1]

    Ngamou P H T, Bahlawane N 2009 J. Solid State Chem. 182 849

    [2]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2005 J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 A197

    [3]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2006 J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 A794

    [4]

    Ecija A, Vidal K, Larrañaga A, Martinez-Amesti A, Ortega-San-Martin L, Arriortua M I 2011 Solid State Ionics 201 35

    [5]

    Sakaki Y, Takeda Y, Kato A, Imanishi N. Yamamoto O. Hattori M, Iio M, Esaki Y 1999 Solid State Ionics 118 187

    [6]

    Wen T L, Tu H Y, Xu Z H, Yamamoto O 1999 Solid State Ionics 121 25

    [7]

    Tu H Y, Takeda Y, Imanishi N, Yamamoto O 1999 Solid State Ionics 117 277

    [8]

    Skinner S J 2001 Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3 113

    [9]

    Qiu L, Ichikawa T, Hirano A, Imanishi N, Takeda Y 2003 Solid State Ionics 158 55

    [10]

    Kostogloudis G C, Ftikos C 2007 J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 27 273

    [11]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2006 J. Power Sour. 158 1202

    [12]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2007 Solid State Ionics 178 995

    [13]

    Torres-Garibay C, Kovar D, Manthiram A 2009 J. Power Sour. 187 480

    [14]

    Dutta a, Mukhopadhyay H, Basu R N 2009 J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 29 2003

    [15]

    Hariharan R, Venkatasubramanian A, Gopalan P 2010 J. Solid State Electrochem. 14 1657

    [16]

    Kharton V V, Maruques F M, B Atkinson A 2004 Solid State Ionics 174 134

    [17]

    Chen T Y, Fung K Z 2004 J. Power Sour. 132 1

    [18]

    Ishihara T 2008 Perovskite Oxide for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (London: Springer) p69

    [19]

    Fu Q X, Tietz F, Lersch P, Stöver D 2006 Solid State Ionics 177 1059

    [20]

    Tsipis E V, Kharton V V, Waerenborgh J C, Rojas D P, Naumovich E N, Frade J R 2006 J. Alloys Comp. 413 244

    [21]

    Xiang J, Wei T, Peng T G, Zhang Y, Lou K X, Shen X Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3402 (in Chinese) [向军, 卫婷, 彭田贵, 张誉, 娄可行, 沈湘黔 2009 58 3402]

    [22]

    Xiang J, Guo Y T, Chu Y Q, Zhou G Z 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 027203 (in Chinese) [向军, 郭银涛, 褚艳秋, 周广振 2011 60 027203]

    [23]

    Zhu C F, Xue J H, Wang L 2011 Chinese. J. Inorg. Chem. 27 2377 (in Chinese) [朱承飞, 薛金花, 王李 2011 无机化学学报 27 2377]

    [24]

    Pecchi G, Campos C, Pena O 2009 Mater. Res. Bull. 44 846

    [25]

    Zhu C F, Wang G, Xue J H, Wang X J 2009 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 25 1179 (in Chinese) [朱承飞, 王刚, 薛金花, 王晓钧2009 物理化学学报 25 1179]

    [26]

    Shannon R D 1976 Acta Cryst. A 32 751

    [27]

    Jiang J G, Cui C, Chen G 2005 J. Mater. Sci. Engin. 23 902 (in Chinese) [江金国, 崔崇, 陈光2005 材料科学与工程学报 23 902]

    [28]

    Mei Y, Chen L, Cao Y Z, Liu B Q, He J H, Zhu Z W, Xu Z A 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2795 (in Chinese) [梅烨, 陈亮, 曹永珍, 刘宝琴, 何军辉, 朱增伟, 许祝安 2010 59 2795]

    [29]

    Xia Z C, Tang C Q 1999 Acta Phys. Sin. 48 1518 (in Chinese) [夏正才, 唐超群 1999 25 1518]

    [30]

    Kang J S, Lee H J, Kim G, Kim G H, Dabrowski B, Kolesnik S, Lee Hangil, Kim J Y, Min B I 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 054434

  • [1]

    Ngamou P H T, Bahlawane N 2009 J. Solid State Chem. 182 849

    [2]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2005 J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 A197

    [3]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2006 J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 A794

    [4]

    Ecija A, Vidal K, Larrañaga A, Martinez-Amesti A, Ortega-San-Martin L, Arriortua M I 2011 Solid State Ionics 201 35

    [5]

    Sakaki Y, Takeda Y, Kato A, Imanishi N. Yamamoto O. Hattori M, Iio M, Esaki Y 1999 Solid State Ionics 118 187

    [6]

    Wen T L, Tu H Y, Xu Z H, Yamamoto O 1999 Solid State Ionics 121 25

    [7]

    Tu H Y, Takeda Y, Imanishi N, Yamamoto O 1999 Solid State Ionics 117 277

    [8]

    Skinner S J 2001 Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3 113

    [9]

    Qiu L, Ichikawa T, Hirano A, Imanishi N, Takeda Y 2003 Solid State Ionics 158 55

    [10]

    Kostogloudis G C, Ftikos C 2007 J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 27 273

    [11]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2006 J. Power Sour. 158 1202

    [12]

    Lee K T, Manthiram A 2007 Solid State Ionics 178 995

    [13]

    Torres-Garibay C, Kovar D, Manthiram A 2009 J. Power Sour. 187 480

    [14]

    Dutta a, Mukhopadhyay H, Basu R N 2009 J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 29 2003

    [15]

    Hariharan R, Venkatasubramanian A, Gopalan P 2010 J. Solid State Electrochem. 14 1657

    [16]

    Kharton V V, Maruques F M, B Atkinson A 2004 Solid State Ionics 174 134

    [17]

    Chen T Y, Fung K Z 2004 J. Power Sour. 132 1

    [18]

    Ishihara T 2008 Perovskite Oxide for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (London: Springer) p69

    [19]

    Fu Q X, Tietz F, Lersch P, Stöver D 2006 Solid State Ionics 177 1059

    [20]

    Tsipis E V, Kharton V V, Waerenborgh J C, Rojas D P, Naumovich E N, Frade J R 2006 J. Alloys Comp. 413 244

    [21]

    Xiang J, Wei T, Peng T G, Zhang Y, Lou K X, Shen X Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3402 (in Chinese) [向军, 卫婷, 彭田贵, 张誉, 娄可行, 沈湘黔 2009 58 3402]

    [22]

    Xiang J, Guo Y T, Chu Y Q, Zhou G Z 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 027203 (in Chinese) [向军, 郭银涛, 褚艳秋, 周广振 2011 60 027203]

    [23]

    Zhu C F, Xue J H, Wang L 2011 Chinese. J. Inorg. Chem. 27 2377 (in Chinese) [朱承飞, 薛金花, 王李 2011 无机化学学报 27 2377]

    [24]

    Pecchi G, Campos C, Pena O 2009 Mater. Res. Bull. 44 846

    [25]

    Zhu C F, Wang G, Xue J H, Wang X J 2009 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 25 1179 (in Chinese) [朱承飞, 王刚, 薛金花, 王晓钧2009 物理化学学报 25 1179]

    [26]

    Shannon R D 1976 Acta Cryst. A 32 751

    [27]

    Jiang J G, Cui C, Chen G 2005 J. Mater. Sci. Engin. 23 902 (in Chinese) [江金国, 崔崇, 陈光2005 材料科学与工程学报 23 902]

    [28]

    Mei Y, Chen L, Cao Y Z, Liu B Q, He J H, Zhu Z W, Xu Z A 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2795 (in Chinese) [梅烨, 陈亮, 曹永珍, 刘宝琴, 何军辉, 朱增伟, 许祝安 2010 59 2795]

    [29]

    Xia Z C, Tang C Q 1999 Acta Phys. Sin. 48 1518 (in Chinese) [夏正才, 唐超群 1999 25 1518]

    [30]

    Kang J S, Lee H J, Kim G, Kim G H, Dabrowski B, Kolesnik S, Lee Hangil, Kim J Y, Min B I 2008 Phys. Rev. B 78 054434

  • [1] 王明豪, 龚高尚, 张会均, 何诗悦, 刘若水, 王利晨, 杨淑娴. Ti4+掺杂对Ca3Co2O6磁性和磁-介电性能的影响.  , 2024, 73(17): 177501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240648
    [2] 严志, 方诚, 王芳, 许小红. 过渡金属元素掺杂对SmCo3合金结构和磁性能影响的第一性原理计算.  , 2024, 73(3): 037502. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231436
    [3] 马孟宇, 蔚翠, 何泽召, 郭建超, 刘庆彬, 冯志红. 氢终端金刚石薄膜生长及其表面结构.  , 2024, 73(8): 088101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240053
    [4] 祝鑫强, 王剑, 朱璨, 罗丰, 陈树权, 徐佳辉, 徐峰, 王嘉赋, 张艳, 孙志刚. Co3Sn2S2单晶的磁性和电-热输运性能.  , 2023, 72(17): 177102. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230621
    [5] 刘庆彬, 蔚翠, 郭建超, 马孟宇, 何泽召, 周闯杰, 高学栋, 余浩, 冯志红. 多晶金刚石对硅基氮化镓材料的影响.  , 2023, 72(9): 098104. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221942
    [6] 陈旭凡, 杨强, 胡小会. 过渡金属原子掺杂对二维CrBr3电磁学性能的调控.  , 2021, 70(24): 247401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210936
    [7] 杨如霞, 卢玉明, 曾丽竹, 张禄佳, 李冠男. 钆掺杂对0.7BiFe0.95Ga0.05O3-0.3BaTiO3陶瓷的结构、介电性能和多铁性能的影响.  , 2020, 69(10): 107701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200175
    [8] 胡前库, 侯一鸣, 吴庆华, 秦双红, 王李波, 周爱国. 过渡金属硼碳化物TM3B3C和TM4B3C2稳定性和性能的理论计算.  , 2019, 68(9): 096201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190158
    [9] 余觉知, 胡勇胜, 李泓, 黄学杰, 陈立泉. 一类阴离子自由基液态电极材料研究.  , 2017, 66(8): 088201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.088201
    [10] 赵小强, 赵学童, 许超, 李巍巍, 任路路, 廖瑞金, 李建英. ZnO-Bi2O3系压敏陶瓷缺陷弛豫特性的研究进展.  , 2017, 66(2): 027701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.027701
    [11] 董国义, 李龙江, 吕青, 王淑芳, 戴守愚, 王江龙, 傅光生. Lu3+掺杂对CdO陶瓷电、热输运性能的影响.  , 2014, 63(17): 178102. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.178102
    [12] 袁昌来, 刘心宇, 黄静月, 周昌荣, 许积文. Bi0.5Ba0.5FeO3 陶瓷的电性能及阻抗分析.  , 2011, 60(2): 025201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025201
    [13] 向军, 郭银涛, 褚艳秋, 周广振. 双掺杂的Sm0.9Sr0.1Al1-xCoxO3-δ钙钛矿结构导电陶瓷的制备及其电性能.  , 2011, 60(2): 027203. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.027203
    [14] 丁南, 唐新桂, 匡淑娟, 伍君博, 刘秋香, 何琴玉. 锰掺杂对Ba(Zr, Ti)O3陶瓷压电与介电性能的影响.  , 2010, 59(9): 6613-6619. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6613
    [15] 顾娟, 王山鹰, 苟秉聪. Au和3d过渡金属元素混合团簇结构、电子结构和磁性的研究.  , 2009, 58(5): 3338-3351. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3338
    [16] 向军, 卫婷, 彭田贵, 张誉, 娄可行, 沈湘黔. 新型混合离子-电子导体Sm0.9Ca0.1Al1-xMnxO3-δ的制备及其电性能研究.  , 2009, 58(5): 3402-3408. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3402
    [17] 向 军, 王晓晖. Sm0.9Sr0.1AlO3-δ钙钛矿氧化物的固相反应合成和电学性能.  , 2008, 57(7): 4417-4423. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4417
    [18] 谭丛兵, 钟向丽, 王金斌, 廖 敏, 周益春, 潘 伟. Nd掺杂对Bi4Ti3O12铁电薄膜的微结构和铁电性能的影响.  , 2007, 56(10): 6084-6089. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6084
    [19] 初宝进, 李国荣, 殷庆瑞, 张望重, 陈大任. 非化学计量和掺杂对(Na1/2Bi1/2)0.92Ba0.08TiO3陶瓷电性能的影响.  , 2001, 50(10): 2012-2016. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2012
    [20] 崔华, 袁启华, 崔万秋. AlF3-K2NbOF5系统非晶态材料离子导体的结构与电性能.  , 1987, 36(12): 1557-1563. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.1557
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8598
  • PDF下载量:  483
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-04-05
  • 修回日期:  2012-06-05
  • 刊出日期:  2012-11-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map