Near-field control of gold nanostructure under joint action of surface plasmon polariton and incident light

Wang Yue; Wang Lun; Sun Bai-Xun; Lang Peng; Xu Yang; Zhao Zhen-Long; Song Xiao-Wei; Ji Bo-Yu; Lin Jing-Quan

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230514

Abstract

Localized surface plasmon (LSP) generated by nanostructure subjected to the excitation of surface plasmon polariton (SPP) possesses stronger near-field enhancement and special spectral and dynamic responses, thereby providing a new idea for exploring the interaction between light and matter. Meanwhile, this scheme can also release the signal background noise and structural thermal effect, and improve the performances of plasmonic components and sensing detectors based on LSP. However, the current research in this aspect is still insufficient. In this paper, we investigate the near-field characteristics of a plasmon composite structure composed of plasmon focusing lens and gold nanorod under the excitation of dual-beam by using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. The result shows that the near-field intensity control on the upper surface and in the gap position of the nanorod can be achieved by adjusting the relative time delay between the first light beam (used to excite SPP) and the second light beam (used to excite LSP). Specifically, the maximum adjustment range of the near-field intensity corresponding to 770 nm resonant mode in the gap position is about 23, and the adjustment period is about 2.4 fs. In a resonant mode dominated by SPP at a wavelength of 999 nm, the adjustment range of near-field intensity is as small as 6, and the adjustment period is about 4 fs. On the upper surface of the structure, the adjustment range of the near-field intensities of the two resonant modes (719 nm and 802 nm) are basically the same (about 15), and their adjustment periods are 2.4 fs and 2.8 fs. The achievement of the near field control is attributed to the coherent superposition of SPP-excited LSP with light-excited LSP. In addition, the dephasing time of the coupling field is investigated by using a quasi- normal mode. It is found that the nanorod structure will correspond to different dephasing time under different relative time delay between two excitation light beams. Specifically, for the time delay of 0.72 fs (Δt = 0.72 fs), the corresponding dephasing times for both modes are the same (6.0 fs). For Δt = 1.92 fs, the dephasing time of the longer-wavelength mode is 7.1 fs, and the one of the shorter-wavelength mode is 5.8 fs. We attribute the difference in dephasing time to different coupling strengths between the two modes at different delay times. This study may further promote the application of plasmons in the fields of surface-enhanced Raman scattering and plasmon assisted catalysis.

Keywords:

plasmonics /
surface plasmon polariton interacts with localized surface plasmon /
near-field control /
finite-difference time-domain

Authors and contacts

School of Physics, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China

Corresponding author: Ji Bo-Yu, jiboyu@cust.edu.cn ; Lin Jing-Quan, linjingquan@cust.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant Nos. 2022YFA1604304, 2022YFA1604303), the Young Scientists Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62005022, 12004052), the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. 20230508143RC), the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. YDZJ202201ZYTS299); the Department of Education of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. JJKH20220720KJ), and the Recruitment Programm of Science and Technology Youth Talents of Jilin Province, China (Grant No. QT202217).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Barnes W L, Dereux A, Ebbesen T W 2003 Nature 6950 824
[2]	Jin X, Xue L, Xiong J C, Ye S W, et al. 2023 In Plasmonics in Biology and Medicine XX, SPIE 12396 34 Google Scholar
[3]	Ren Y, Li T, Zhou J, et al. 2023 Opt. Mater. Express 3 796 Google Scholar
[4]	Wu N, Zhang Y, Ma H, et al. 2021 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 172 23 Google Scholar
[5]	Ahmed A, Gordon R 2011 Nano Lett. 4 1800 Google Scholar
[6]	Cui W, Peng W, Yu L, et al. 2019 Nanomaterials 3 334 Google Scholar
[7]	Liu L, Li Z 2022 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 173 93 Google Scholar
[8]	Fainman Y, Tetz K, Rokitski R, Pang L I N 2006 Opt. Photonics News 17 24 Google Scholar
[9]	Ritchie R H 1957 Phys. Rev. 106 874 Google Scholar
[10]	Zhou Y C, Zhang X C, Hu X, Tang L L, Cao Y, Li J Q, Wang J, Dong Z G 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 8 083103 Google Scholar
[11]	Zeng P, Cadusch J, Chakraborty D, Smith T A, Roberts A, Sader J E, Davis J, Gómez D E 2016 Nano Lett. 16 2651 Google Scholar
[12]	Lerman G M, Yanai A, Levy U 2009 Nano Lett. 9 2139 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu Z, Steele J M, Lee H, Zhang X 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 171108 Google Scholar
[14]	Liu Z, Steele J M, Srituravanich W, Pikus, Y, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1726 Google Scholar
[15]	Darak M S, Mote R G, Shukla S 2018 Ann. Phys. 530 1800193 Google Scholar
[16]	Qin Y, Ji B, Song X, Lin J 2021 JOSA B 38 C58 Google Scholar
[17]	Lerman G M, Yanai A, Ben-Yosef N, Levy U 2010 Opt. Express 18 10871 Google Scholar
[18]	Chen W, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q. 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4320 Google Scholar
[19]	Rahbany N, Geng W, Montiel R S, Cruz S D L, Méndez E R, Blaize S, Couteau R B C 2016 Plasmonics 11 175 Google Scholar
[20]	Podbiel D, Kahl P, Makris A, et al. 2017 Nano Lett. 17 6569 Google Scholar
[21]	Yang S, Chen W, Nelson R L, Zhan Q 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 3047 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen W, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2075 Google Scholar
[23]	Fang Z, Peng Q, Song W, et al. 2011 Nano Lett. 11 893 Google Scholar
[24]	Müller M, Kravtsov V, Paarmann A, Raschke M B, Ernstorfer R 2016 ACS Photonics 3 611 Google Scholar
[25]	Ciappina M F, Pérez-Hernández J A, Landsman A S, et al.M. 2017 Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 054401 Google Scholar
[26]	Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Science 308 534 Google Scholar
[27]	Willets K A, Wilson A J, Sundaresan V, Joshi P B 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 7538 Google Scholar
[28]	Srituravanich W, Pan L, Wang Y, Sun C, Bogy D B, Zhang X 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 733 Google Scholar
[29]	Xia M, Zhang P, Qiao K, Bai Y, Xie Y H 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 527 Google Scholar
[30]	Knight M W, Sobhani H, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2011 Science 332 702 Google Scholar
[31]	Zijlstra P, Paulo P, Orrit M 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 737 Google Scholar
[32]	Kauranen M, Zayats A V 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 737 Google Scholar
[33]	Seok T J, Jamshidi A, Kim M, et al. 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2606 Google Scholar
[34]	Fernandez-Garcia R, Rahmani M, Hong M, Maier S A, Sonnefraud Y 2013 Opt. Express 21 12552 Google Scholar
[35]	Chu Y, Zhu W, Wang D, Crozier K B 2011 Opt. Express 19 20054 Google Scholar
[36]	Wang D, Zhu W, MD Best, Camden J P, Crozier K B 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2194 Google Scholar
[37]	Sun B, Ji B, Lang P, Qin Y, Lin J 2022 Opt. Commun. 505 127498 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhe S Lei S, Yao C 2016 Opt. Express 24 16052 Google Scholar
[39]	Lalanne P, Hugonin J P, Liu H. T, Wang B 2009 Surf. Sci. Rep. 64 453 Google Scholar
[40]	Johnson P B, Christy R W 1972 Phys. Rev. B 6 4370 Google Scholar
[41]	Chu Y, Crozier K B 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 244 Google Scholar
[42]	Farhang A, Bigler, Martin O J 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 4758 Google Scholar
[43]	Schertz F, Schmelzeisen M, Mohammadi R, Kreiter M, Elmers H J, Sch Nhense G 2012 Nano Lett. 2 1885 Google Scholar
[44]	Ma Y, Huang Y, Zhu Y, et al. 2023 Nanomaterials 13 492 Google Scholar
[45]	Shen Q, Boyce A M, Yang G, Mikkelsen M H 2019 ACS Photonics 6 1916 Google Scholar
[46]	Wang L M, Petek H 2013 Laser Photonics Rev 7 1003 Google Scholar
[47]	Wang Y, Ming C, Zhang Y, Xu J, Feng F, Li L, Yuan X 2020 Opt. Express 28 33516 Google Scholar
[48]	Rahbany N, Geng W, Bachelot R, Couteau C 2018 Nanotechnology 28 185201 Google Scholar
[49]	冯仕靓, 王靖宇, 陈舒, 孟令雁, 沈少鑫, 杨志林 2019 68 147801 Google Scholar Feng S L, Wang J Y, Chen S, Meng L Y, Shen S X, Yang Z L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 147801 Google Scholar
[50]	Zhang Q, Li G C, Lo T W, Lei D Y 2018 J. Opt. 20 024010 Google Scholar
[51]	Lemke C, Lei Ner T, Evlyukhin A, et al. 2014 Nano Lett. 5 2431 Google Scholar
[52]	Mårsell E, Losquin A, Svärd R, et al. 2015 Nano Lett. 15 6601 Google Scholar
[53]	Ji B, Qin J, Tao H, Hao Z, Lin J 2016 New J. Phys. 18 093046 Google Scholar
[54]	Melchior P, Bayer D, Schneider C, Fischer A, Rohmer M, Pfeiffer W, Aeschlimann M 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 235407 Google Scholar
[55]	Hensen M, Huber B, Friedrich D, et al. 2019 Nano Lett. 19 4651 Google Scholar
[56]	Hanke T, Cesar J, Knittel V, Trügler A, Hohenester U, Leitenstorfer A, Bratschitsch R 2012 Nano Lett. 12 992 Google Scholar
[57]	Ueno K, Yang J, Sun Q, et al. 2019 Appl. Mater. 14 159 Google Scholar
[58]	Yang J H, Sun Q, Ueno K, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4858 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 等离激元聚焦透镜与金纳米棒复合结构示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the composite structure of plasmon focusing lens and gold nanorod.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 表面等离激元聚焦透镜结构参数对聚焦焦斑强度的影响　(a)表面等离激元聚焦透镜结构示意图; (b)表面等离激元透镜近场分布图像; (c)狭缝宽度W对聚焦焦斑处近场强度的影响; (d)狭缝厚度H对聚焦焦斑处近场强度的影响

Figure 2. Effect of structural parameters of surface plasmon focusing lens on focal spot intensity: (a) Schematic diagram of the surface plasmon focusing lens; (b) near-field distribution of the surface plasmon lenses; (c) effect of slit width W on near-field strength at focal spot; (d) effect of slit thickness H on near-field strength at focal spot.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 表面等离激元透镜与金纳米棒光学响应　(a)金纳米棒结构(上图)与等离激元聚焦透镜结构(下图)近场强度分布曲线; 波长在800 nm金纳米棒近场强度x-z平面分布图(b)和E_z分布图(c); 波长在800 nm附近表面等离激元透镜近场强度x-z平面分布图(d)和E_z分布图(e)

Figure 3. Optical response of the surface plasmon focusing lens and the gold nanorod: (a) Near-field intensity spectra of gold nanorod structure (top) and plasmon focusing lens structure (bottom); near-field intensity distribution (b) and E_z component distribution (c) of gold nanorods at the wavelengths of 800 nm; near-field intensity distribution (d) and E_z component distribution (e) of the surface plasmon focusing lens at the wavelengths of 800 nm

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 间隙位置近场强度光谱曲线以及共振波长处近场强度调控曲线　(a)间隙位置近场强度光谱曲线, 黑色曲线为相对时间延时Δt = 0.72 fs时, SPP&S2-nanorod激发条件, 红色曲线和蓝色曲线分别代表S2-nanorod 和SPP-nanorod激发条件; (b)共振波长770 nm (黑色曲线)和共振波长999 nm (红色曲线)处, 不同双光束相对时间延时对应的近场强度

Figure 4. Near-field intensity spectrum at gap position and near-field intensity regulation related with relative time delay between two laser pulses at resonant wavelength: (a) Near-field intensity spectrum for gap positions, the black curve corresponds to SPP&S2-nanorod at the relative time delay Δt = 0.72 fs; the red and blue curve corresponds to S2-nanorod and SPP-nanorod, respectively; (b) relative time delay dependent near field intensity at the resonance wavelength of 770 nm (black curve) and 999 nm (red curve), respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 间隙位置E_z分量动力学演化曲线 (a)—(d)对应于图4(b)中①③②④位置. 蓝色曲线为S2-nanorod; 红色曲线表示SPP-nanorod条件下, 图中蓝色线的起始时间根据相对延迟数进行了调整

Figure 5. Dynamics evolution of E_z component at the gap position: (a)–(d) Corresponding to the position ①③②④ in Figure 4(b), respectively. The blue and red curves correspond to S2-nanorod and SPP-nanorod, respectively. The initial time of the blue curve in the graph is adjusted based on the relative time delays.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 结构上表面近场强度光谱曲线以及共振波长处近场强度调控曲线　(a)上表面近场强度分布曲线; (b)共振波长719 nm(黑色曲线)和共振波长802 nm(红色曲线)处, 不同双光束相对时间延时对应的近场强度

Figure 6. Near-field intensity spectrum at the upper surface of nanorod and near-field intensity regulation related with relative time delay between two laser pulses at resonant wavelength: (a) Near-field intensity spectrum at the upper surface of nanorod; (b) relative time delay dependent near field intensity at the resonance wavelength of 719 nm (black curve) and 802 nm (red curve), respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 纳米棒上表面E_z分量动力学演化曲线　(a)—(d)对应于图6(b)中①③②④ 位置, 图中蓝色线的起始时间根据相对延迟数进行了调整

Figure 7. Dynamics evolution of E_z component at the upper surface of nanorod: (a)–(d) Corresponding to the position ①③②④ in Fig. 6(b), respectively. The initial time of the blue curve in the graph is adjusted based on the relative time delays.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 间隙位置电场强度E_z分量分布图　(a)共振波长为770 nm; (b)共振波长为999 nm. Ⅰ为S2-nanorod; Ⅱ为SPP-nanorod; Ⅲ为 SPP&S2-nanorod

Figure 8. E_z component distribution in the gap position of the nanorod: (a) The resonance wavelength is 770 nm; (b) the resonance wavelength is 999 nm. The excitation conditions corresponding to Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ are S2-nanorod, SPP-nanorod and SPP&S2-nanorod, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 金纳米棒上表面电场强度E_z分量分布图　(a)共振波长为719 nm; (b)共振波长为802 nm. Ⅰ为S2-nanorod; Ⅱ为SPP-nanorod; Ⅲ为 SPP&S2-nanorod

Figure 9. E_z component distribution of the near field in the upper surface of the nanorod: (a) The resonance wavelength is 719 nm; (b) the resonance wavelength is 802 nm. The excitation conditions corresponding to Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ are S2-nanorod, SPP-nanorod and SPP&S2-nanorod, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 不同情况下间隙模式去相位时间比较　(a) S2-nanorod; (b) SPP-nanorod; (c)相对时间延时Δt = 0.72 fs激发LSP; (d)相对时间延时Δt = 1.92 fs激发LSP

Figure 10. Dephasing times of the gap mode under various excitation conditions: (a) S2-LSP; (b) SPP-LSP; SPP&S2-LSP with the relative time delay Δt = 0.72 fs (c) and Δt = 1.92 fs (d).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 不同激发方式下LSP去相位时间和近场强度比较

Table 1. Comparison of dephasing time and near-field intensity of LSP under different excitation conditions.

	S2-LSP	SPP-LSP		双光束Δt = 0.72 fs		双光束Δt = 1.92 fs
波长/nm	769	996.4	769.2	1000	774.2	972.4	774.2
频率/THz	390	302	390	300	387.5	308.5	387.5
去相位时间/fs	5.9	5.3	5.1	6.0	6.0	7.1	5.8
电场强度	37.6	12. 7	9.6	15.9	48.1	13.6	28.7

DownLoad: CSV

map

[1]	Barnes W L, Dereux A, Ebbesen T W 2003 Nature 6950 824
[2]	Jin X, Xue L, Xiong J C, Ye S W, et al. 2023 In Plasmonics in Biology and Medicine XX, SPIE 12396 34 Google Scholar
[3]	Ren Y, Li T, Zhou J, et al. 2023 Opt. Mater. Express 3 796 Google Scholar
[4]	Wu N, Zhang Y, Ma H, et al. 2021 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 172 23 Google Scholar
[5]	Ahmed A, Gordon R 2011 Nano Lett. 4 1800 Google Scholar
[6]	Cui W, Peng W, Yu L, et al. 2019 Nanomaterials 3 334 Google Scholar
[7]	Liu L, Li Z 2022 Prog. Electromagn. Res. 173 93 Google Scholar
[8]	Fainman Y, Tetz K, Rokitski R, Pang L I N 2006 Opt. Photonics News 17 24 Google Scholar
[9]	Ritchie R H 1957 Phys. Rev. 106 874 Google Scholar
[10]	Zhou Y C, Zhang X C, Hu X, Tang L L, Cao Y, Li J Q, Wang J, Dong Z G 2021 J. Appl. Phys. 8 083103 Google Scholar
[11]	Zeng P, Cadusch J, Chakraborty D, Smith T A, Roberts A, Sader J E, Davis J, Gómez D E 2016 Nano Lett. 16 2651 Google Scholar
[12]	Lerman G M, Yanai A, Levy U 2009 Nano Lett. 9 2139 Google Scholar
[13]	Liu Z, Steele J M, Lee H, Zhang X 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 171108 Google Scholar
[14]	Liu Z, Steele J M, Srituravanich W, Pikus, Y, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1726 Google Scholar
[15]	Darak M S, Mote R G, Shukla S 2018 Ann. Phys. 530 1800193 Google Scholar
[16]	Qin Y, Ji B, Song X, Lin J 2021 JOSA B 38 C58 Google Scholar
[17]	Lerman G M, Yanai A, Ben-Yosef N, Levy U 2010 Opt. Express 18 10871 Google Scholar
[18]	Chen W, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q. 2009 Nano Lett. 9 4320 Google Scholar
[19]	Rahbany N, Geng W, Montiel R S, Cruz S D L, Méndez E R, Blaize S, Couteau R B C 2016 Plasmonics 11 175 Google Scholar
[20]	Podbiel D, Kahl P, Makris A, et al. 2017 Nano Lett. 17 6569 Google Scholar
[21]	Yang S, Chen W, Nelson R L, Zhan Q 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 3047 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen W, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2075 Google Scholar
[23]	Fang Z, Peng Q, Song W, et al. 2011 Nano Lett. 11 893 Google Scholar
[24]	Müller M, Kravtsov V, Paarmann A, Raschke M B, Ernstorfer R 2016 ACS Photonics 3 611 Google Scholar
[25]	Ciappina M F, Pérez-Hernández J A, Landsman A S, et al.M. 2017 Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 054401 Google Scholar
[26]	Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Science 308 534 Google Scholar
[27]	Willets K A, Wilson A J, Sundaresan V, Joshi P B 2017 Chem. Rev. 117 7538 Google Scholar
[28]	Srituravanich W, Pan L, Wang Y, Sun C, Bogy D B, Zhang X 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 733 Google Scholar
[29]	Xia M, Zhang P, Qiao K, Bai Y, Xie Y H 2016 J. Phys. Chem. C 120 527 Google Scholar
[30]	Knight M W, Sobhani H, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2011 Science 332 702 Google Scholar
[31]	Zijlstra P, Paulo P, Orrit M 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 737 Google Scholar
[32]	Kauranen M, Zayats A V 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 737 Google Scholar
[33]	Seok T J, Jamshidi A, Kim M, et al. 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2606 Google Scholar
[34]	Fernandez-Garcia R, Rahmani M, Hong M, Maier S A, Sonnefraud Y 2013 Opt. Express 21 12552 Google Scholar
[35]	Chu Y, Zhu W, Wang D, Crozier K B 2011 Opt. Express 19 20054 Google Scholar
[36]	Wang D, Zhu W, MD Best, Camden J P, Crozier K B 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2194 Google Scholar
[37]	Sun B, Ji B, Lang P, Qin Y, Lin J 2022 Opt. Commun. 505 127498 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhe S Lei S, Yao C 2016 Opt. Express 24 16052 Google Scholar
[39]	Lalanne P, Hugonin J P, Liu H. T, Wang B 2009 Surf. Sci. Rep. 64 453 Google Scholar
[40]	Johnson P B, Christy R W 1972 Phys. Rev. B 6 4370 Google Scholar
[41]	Chu Y, Crozier K B 2009 Opt. Lett. 34 244 Google Scholar
[42]	Farhang A, Bigler, Martin O J 2013 Opt. Lett. 38 4758 Google Scholar
[43]	Schertz F, Schmelzeisen M, Mohammadi R, Kreiter M, Elmers H J, Sch Nhense G 2012 Nano Lett. 2 1885 Google Scholar
[44]	Ma Y, Huang Y, Zhu Y, et al. 2023 Nanomaterials 13 492 Google Scholar
[45]	Shen Q, Boyce A M, Yang G, Mikkelsen M H 2019 ACS Photonics 6 1916 Google Scholar
[46]	Wang L M, Petek H 2013 Laser Photonics Rev 7 1003 Google Scholar
[47]	Wang Y, Ming C, Zhang Y, Xu J, Feng F, Li L, Yuan X 2020 Opt. Express 28 33516 Google Scholar
[48]	Rahbany N, Geng W, Bachelot R, Couteau C 2018 Nanotechnology 28 185201 Google Scholar
[49]	冯仕靓, 王靖宇, 陈舒, 孟令雁, 沈少鑫, 杨志林 2019 68 147801 Google Scholar Feng S L, Wang J Y, Chen S, Meng L Y, Shen S X, Yang Z L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 147801 Google Scholar
[50]	Zhang Q, Li G C, Lo T W, Lei D Y 2018 J. Opt. 20 024010 Google Scholar
[51]	Lemke C, Lei Ner T, Evlyukhin A, et al. 2014 Nano Lett. 5 2431 Google Scholar
[52]	Mårsell E, Losquin A, Svärd R, et al. 2015 Nano Lett. 15 6601 Google Scholar
[53]	Ji B, Qin J, Tao H, Hao Z, Lin J 2016 New J. Phys. 18 093046 Google Scholar
[54]	Melchior P, Bayer D, Schneider C, Fischer A, Rohmer M, Pfeiffer W, Aeschlimann M 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 235407 Google Scholar
[55]	Hensen M, Huber B, Friedrich D, et al. 2019 Nano Lett. 19 4651 Google Scholar
[56]	Hanke T, Cesar J, Knittel V, Trügler A, Hohenester U, Leitenstorfer A, Bratschitsch R 2012 Nano Lett. 12 992 Google Scholar
[57]	Ueno K, Yang J, Sun Q, et al. 2019 Appl. Mater. 14 159 Google Scholar
[58]	Yang J H, Sun Q, Ueno K, et al. 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 4858 Google Scholar

[1]	Zhao Xiang-Yu, Qin Yu-Lu, Ji Bo-Yu, Lang Peng, Song Xiao-Wei, Lin Jing-Quan. Near-field imaging of femtosecond propagating surface plasmon and regulation of excitation efficiency. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10): 107101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201827
[2]	Guan Fu-Xin, Dong Shao-Hua, He Qiong, Xiao Shi-Yi, Sun Shu-Lin, Zhou Lei. Scatterings and wavefront manipulations of surface plasmon polaritons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(15): 157804. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200614
[3]	Zhang Bao-Bao, Zhang Cheng-Yun, Zhang Zheng-Long, Zheng Hai-Rong. Surface plasmon mediated chemical reaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 147102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190345
[4]	Feng Shi-Liang, Wang Jing-Yu, Chen Shu, Meng Ling-Yan, Shen Shao-Xin, Yang Zhi-Lin. Surface plasmon resonance “hot spots” and near-field enhanced spectroscopy at interfaces. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 147801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190305
[5]	Ren Xin-Cheng, Zhu Xiao-Min, Liu Peng. Wide-band composite electromagnetic scattering from the earth soil surface and multiple targets shallowly buried. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(20): 204101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.204101
[6]	Wang Fei, Wei Bing, Yang Qian, Li Lin-Qian. Newmark algorithm in the finite-difference time-domain analysis of ferrite magnetized in an arbitrary direction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(16): 164101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.164101
[7]	Wang Fei, Wei Bing, Li Lin-Qian. Newmark method for finite-difference time-domain modeling of wave propagation in frequency-dispersive medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 104101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.104101
[8]	Wang Fei, Wei Bing. Semi-analytical recursive convolution algorithm in the finite-difference time domain analysis of anisotropic dispersive medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(4): 044101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.044101
[9]	Wang Fei, Wei Bing. Z-transform algorithm in the finite-difference time domain analysis of ferrite subject to an arbitrary direction of external magnetic field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(8): 084106. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.084106
[10]	Yang Li-Xia, Ma Hui, Shi Wei-Dong, Shi Li-Juan, Yu Ping-Ping. Finite difference time domain analysis on electromagnetic scattering characteristic of plasma thin layer based on surface impedance boundary condition method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(3): 034102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.034102
[11]	Cong Chao, Wu Da-Jian, Liu Xiao-Jun. Study on the local field enhancement of elliptical gold nanotube. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(4): 047802. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.047802
[12]	Cong Chao, Wu Da-Jian, Liu Xiao-Jun, Li Bo. Study on the localized surface plasmon resonance properties of bimetallic gold and silver three-layered nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(3): 037301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.037301
[13]	Hu Hai-Feng, Cai Li-Kang, Bai Wen-Li, Zhang Jing, Wang Li-Na, Song Guo-Feng. Simulation research on the control of terahertz beam direction by surface plasmon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 014220. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.014220
[14]	Cong Chao, Wu Da-Jian, Liu Xiao-Jun. Localized surface plasmon resonance propertiesof elliptical gold nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 046102. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.046102
[15]	Yang Li-Xia, Xie Ying-Tao, Kong Wa, Yu Ping-Ping, Wang Gang. A novel finite-difference time-domain scheme for electromagnetic scattering by stratified anisotropic plasma under oblique incidence condition. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(9): 6089-6095. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6089
[16]	Wei Bing, Ge De-Biao, Wang Fei. A general method for finite difference time domain modeling of wave propagation in frequency-dispersive media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(10): 6290-6297. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6290
[17]	Yang Li-Xia, Ge De-Biao, Zhao Yue-Hua, Wang Gang, Yan Shu. A direct discrete-finite-difference time-domain implementation of electromagnetic scattering by magnetized ferrite medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2936-2940. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2936
[18]	Yang Li-Xia, Ge De-Biao, Wei Bing. Three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain implementation for anisotropic dispersive medium using recursive convolution method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(8): 4509-4514. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4509
[19]	. A recursive convolution-finite-difference time-domain implementation of electromagnetic scattering by magnetized ferrite medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(12): 6937-6944. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6937
[20]	Yang Li-Xia, Ge De-Biao. Padé-finite-difference time-domain analysis of electromagnetic scattering in magnetic anisotropic medium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(4): 1751-1758. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1751

Catalog

Vol. 72, Issue 17 - 2023-09-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 3193
PDF Downloads: 106
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板