-
Selecting the double-parameter asymmetric Gaussian (AG) potential to describe the confinement effect of electrons in a quantum dot, the ground state and the first excited state energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the three-body interaction system that are composed of the electrons, the impurity and the longitudinal optical phonon are derived by using the Lee-Low-Pines unitary transformation and the Pekar-type variational method, and the two-level structure required for a qubit is constructed. The influences of material parameters such as the dispersion coefficient, dielectric constant (DC) ratio, and electron-phonon coupling (EPC) constant on the probability density and the oscillation period of electron in the AG potential qubit are investigated. Based on the Fermi gold rule and the even-order approximation, the effects of the DC ratio, the dispersion coefficient and the EPC constant on the qubit decoherence are studied. And then the influences of the dispersion coefficient, the DC ratio and the EPC constant on the phase rotation manipulation of the qubit sphere are discussed. Numerical results show that the dispersion coefficient, the DC ratio and EPC constant of the medium have both advantages and disadvantages for the formation and information storage of qubits. The probability density of electrons in quantum dot qubits decreases with DC ratio increasing and exhibits significant oscillations as the well width of the AG potential decreases; the oscillation period of the qubit decreases with the well depth of the AG potential or the DC ratio increasing; the decoherence time increases with DC ratio or dispersion coefficient increasing; the phase rotation quality factor increases with DC ratio or dispersion coefficient increasing. Using the double-parameter AG potential to describe the confinement of electrons in quantum dot will better reflect the quantization properties of qubit. Increasing the dispersion coefficient or the DC ratio of the material is beneficial to not only the phase rotation manipulation of the qubit sphere, but also improving the coherence of the quantum dot qubit. The results of this paper can be used for reference in the experimental work on the constructing and manipulating of the quantum dot qubits.
-
Keywords:
- qubit /
- asymmetric Gaussian potential /
- probability density /
- oscillation period /
- decoherence time /
- phase rotation quality factor
[1] Li S S, Long G L, Bai F S, Feng S L, Zheng H Z 2001 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98 11847
Google Scholar
[2] Zhang X, Li H O, Wang K, Cao G, Xiao X, Guo G P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020305
Google Scholar
[3] Tang J, Xu X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 027804
Google Scholar
[4] Wang K, Li H O, Xiao M, Cao G, Guo G P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 090308
Google Scholar
[5] Xiao W, Xiao J L 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 2936
Google Scholar
[6] Chen Y J, Xiao J L 2017 J. Low Temp. Phys. 186 241
Google Scholar
[7] Sun Y, Ding Z H, Xiao J L 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 439
Google Scholar
[8] Wang X Q, Xiao J L 2017 Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 41 273
Google Scholar
[9] Khordad R, Goudarzi S, Bahramiyan H 2016 Indian J. Phys. 90 659
Google Scholar
[10] Xie W F 2003 Solid State Commun. 127 401
Google Scholar
[11] 谷娟, 梁九卿 2005 54 5335
Google Scholar
Gu J, Liang J J 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5335
Google Scholar
[12] Xiao W, Qi B, Xiao J L 2015 J. Low Temp. Phys. 179 166
Google Scholar
[13] Xiao J L 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 147
Google Scholar
[14] Wuyunqimuge, Xin W, Wang G S, Eerdunchaolu 2018 J. Low Temp. Phys. 193 48
Google Scholar
[15] Bai X F, Zhao Y W, Xin W, Yin H W, Eerdunchaolu 2019 Opt. Quant. Electron. 51 114
Google Scholar
[16] Lee T D, Low F M, Pines D 1953 Phys. Rev. 90 297
Google Scholar
[17] Pekar S I, Deigen M F 1948 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18 481
[18] Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1987 Quantum Mechanics: Nonrelativistic Theory (London: Pergamen) p532
[19] Sun Y, Ding Z H, Xiao J L 2014 J. Low Temp. Phys. 177 151
Google Scholar
[20] Liang Z H, Cai C Y, Xiao J L 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 2320
Google Scholar
-
图 1 能隙
$\Delta E$ 在非对称高斯势不同阱深${V_0}$ 下随阱宽L的变化Figure 1. Energy gap
$\Delta E$ versus the well width L under different the well depth${V_0}$ of the asymmetric Gaussian (AG) potential.
图 10 相位品质因子Q在不同色散系数
$\varsigma $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 10. Quality factors of phase rotation Q as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different dispersion coefficient
$\varsigma $ .
图 2 能隙
$\Delta E$ 在不同介电常数比$\eta $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 2. Energy gap
$\Delta E$ versus the well width L of the AG potential under different the dielectric constant (DC) ratio$\eta $ 
图 3 概率密度w在高斯势不同阱深
${V_0}$ 下随阱宽L的变化Figure 3. Probability density w versus the well width L under different the well depth
${V_0}$ of the AG potential.
图 4 概率密度w在不同介电常数比
$\eta $ 下随高斯势不同阱宽L的变化Figure 4. Probability density w as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different the DC ratio
$\eta $ .
图 5 振动周期T在高斯势不同阱深
${V_0}$ 下随其阱宽L的变化Figure 5. Variations of oscillation period T as a function of the well width L at different well width L of the AG potential.
图 6 振动周期T在不同介电常数比
$\eta $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 6. Variations of oscillation period T as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different the DC ratio
$\eta $ 
图 7 自发辐射率
${\tau ^{ - 1}}$ 在不同介电常数比$\eta $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 7. Spontaneous emission rate
${\tau ^{ - 1}}$ as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different the DC ratio$\eta $ 
图 8 自发辐射率
${\tau ^{ - 1}}$ 在不同色散系数$\varsigma $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 8. Spontaneous emission rate
${\tau ^{ - 1}}$ as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different dispersion coefficient$\varsigma $ .
图 9 相位品质因子Q在不同介电常数比
$\eta $ 下随高斯势阱宽L的变化Figure 9. Quality factors of phase rotation Q as a function of the well width L of the AG potential at different the DC ratio
$\eta $ . -
[1] Li S S, Long G L, Bai F S, Feng S L, Zheng H Z 2001 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98 11847
Google Scholar
[2] Zhang X, Li H O, Wang K, Cao G, Xiao X, Guo G P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020305
Google Scholar
[3] Tang J, Xu X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 027804
Google Scholar
[4] Wang K, Li H O, Xiao M, Cao G, Guo G P 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 090308
Google Scholar
[5] Xiao W, Xiao J L 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 2936
Google Scholar
[6] Chen Y J, Xiao J L 2017 J. Low Temp. Phys. 186 241
Google Scholar
[7] Sun Y, Ding Z H, Xiao J L 2017 J. Electron. Mater. 46 439
Google Scholar
[8] Wang X Q, Xiao J L 2017 Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 41 273
Google Scholar
[9] Khordad R, Goudarzi S, Bahramiyan H 2016 Indian J. Phys. 90 659
Google Scholar
[10] Xie W F 2003 Solid State Commun. 127 401
Google Scholar
[11] 谷娟, 梁九卿 2005 54 5335
Google Scholar
Gu J, Liang J J 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5335
Google Scholar
[12] Xiao W, Qi B, Xiao J L 2015 J. Low Temp. Phys. 179 166
Google Scholar
[13] Xiao J L 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 147
Google Scholar
[14] Wuyunqimuge, Xin W, Wang G S, Eerdunchaolu 2018 J. Low Temp. Phys. 193 48
Google Scholar
[15] Bai X F, Zhao Y W, Xin W, Yin H W, Eerdunchaolu 2019 Opt. Quant. Electron. 51 114
Google Scholar
[16] Lee T D, Low F M, Pines D 1953 Phys. Rev. 90 297
Google Scholar
[17] Pekar S I, Deigen M F 1948 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18 481
[18] Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1987 Quantum Mechanics: Nonrelativistic Theory (London: Pergamen) p532
[19] Sun Y, Ding Z H, Xiao J L 2014 J. Low Temp. Phys. 177 151
Google Scholar
[20] Liang Z H, Cai C Y, Xiao J L 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 2320
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6073
- PDF Downloads: 39
- Cited By: 0
