-
For the dynamic reconstruction of the chaotic dynamical system, a method of identifying an exponential weighted online sequential extreme learning machine with kernel(EW-KOSELM) is proposed. The kernel recursive least square (KRLS) algorithm is directly extended to an online sequential ELM framework, and weakens the effect of old data by introducing a forgetting factor. Meanwhile, the proposed algorithm can deal with the ever-increasing computational difficulties inherent in online kernel learning algorithms based on the ‘fixed-budget’ memory technique. The employed EW-KOSELM identification method is firstly applied to the numerical example of Duffing-Ueda oscillator for chaotic dynamical system based on simulated data, the qualitative and quantitative analysis for various validation tests of the dynamical properties of the original system as well as the identification model are carried out. A set of qualitative validation criteria is implemented by comparing chaotic attractors i.e. embedding trajectories, computing the corresponding Poincare mapping, plotting the bifurcation diagram, and plotting the steady-state trajectory i.e. the limit cycle between the original system and the identification model. Simultaneously, the quantitative validation criterion which includes computing the largest positive Lyapunov exponent and the correlation dimension of the chaotic attractors is also calculated to measure the closeness i.e. the approximation error between the original system and the identification model. The employed method is further applied to a practical implementation example of Chua's circuit based on the experimental data which are generated by sampling and recording the measured voltage across a capacitor, the inductor current from the double-scroll attractor, the measured voltage across a capacitor from the Chua's spiral attractor and an experimental time series from a chaotic circuit. The digital filtering technique is then used as a preprocessing approach, on the basis of wavelet denoising the measured data with lower signal-noise ratio (SNR) which can produce the double-scroll attractor or the spiral attractor, the reconstruction attractor of the identification model is compared with the reconstruction attractor from the experimental data for original system. The above experimental results confirm that the EW-FB-KOSELM identification method has a better performance of dynamic reconstruction, which can produce an accurate nonlinear model of process exhibiting chaotic dynamics. The identification model is dynamically equivalent or system approximation to the original system.
-
Keywords:
- dynamic reconstruction /
- chaotic system /
- kernel method /
- exponential weighted online sequential extreme learning machine
[1] Chen G R, Dong X N 1998 From Chaos to Order: Methodologies, Perspectives and Applications (Singapore: World Scientific) pp21-134
[2] [3] Aguirre L A, Letellier C 2009 Math. Probl. Eng. 2009 1Google Scholar
[4] Ahmad T A, Sundarapandian V 2015 Chaos Modeling and Control Systems Design (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp59-72
[5] [6] Mattera D, Haykin S 1999 Advances in Kernel Methods: Support vector learning (Cambridge: MIT Press) p211
[7] Ishii S, Sato M A 2001 Neural Networks 14 1239Google Scholar
[8] Zhang Z, Wang T, Liu X 2014 Neurocomputing 131 368Google Scholar
[9] 李瑞国, 张宏立, 范文慧, 王雅 2015 64 200506Google Scholar
Li R G, Zhang H L, Fan W H, Wang Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 200506Google Scholar
[10] 王新迎, 韩敏 2015 64 070504Google Scholar
Wang X Y, Han M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 070504Google Scholar
[11] Wen S, Zeng Z, Huang T, Chen Y 2013 Phys. Lett. A 377 2016Google Scholar
[12] Miranian A, Abdollahzade M 2013 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 24 207Google Scholar
[13] Shaw P K, Saha D, Ghosh S, Janaki M S, Lyengar A S 2015 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 78 285Google Scholar
[14] Billings S A, Coca D 1999 Int. J. Bifurcat.Chaos 9 1263Google Scholar
[15] Sanchez L, Infante S 2013 Chil. J. Stat. 4 35
[16] Aguirre L A, Teixeira B O S, Torres L A B 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 026226Google Scholar
[17] 李军, 董海鹰 2008 57 4756Google Scholar
Li J, Dong H Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4756Google Scholar
[18] Huang G B, Zhu Q Y, Siew C K 2006 Neurocomputing 70 489Google Scholar
[19] Liang N Y, Huang G B, Saratchandran P, Sundararajan N 2006 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17 1411Google Scholar
[20] Scardapane S, Comminiello D, Scarpiniti M, Uncini A 2015 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26 2214
[21] Vaerenbergh S V, Santamaria I, Liu W, Principe J C 2010 The 35th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing Dallas, Texas, USA, March 14-19, 2010 p1882
[22] Liu W, Principe J C, Haykin S 2010 Kernel Adaptive Filtering: A Comprehensive Introduction pp108-110
[23] Engel Y, Mannor S, Meir R 2004 IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 52 2275Google Scholar
[24] se Kruif B J, de Vries T J A 2003 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14 696Google Scholar
[25] Ueda Y 1985 Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 20 481Google Scholar
[26] Yang Z, Gao Y, Gao Y, Zhang J 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 060506Google Scholar
[27] Odavic J, Mali P, Tekic J, Pantic M, Pavkov-Hrvojevic M 2017 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 47 100Google Scholar
[28] Suykens J A K, Vandewalle J 1995 IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Fund. Theor. Appl. 42 499Google Scholar
[29] Cannas B, Cincotti S, Marchesi M, Pilo F 2001 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 12 2109Google Scholar
[30] Aguirre L A, Rodrigues G G, Mendes E M 1997 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 7 1411Google Scholar
[31] Kennedy M P 1992 Frequenz 46 66Google Scholar
[32] Timmer J, Rust H, Horbelt W, Voss H U 2000 Phys. Lett. A 274 123Google Scholar
-
-
[1] Chen G R, Dong X N 1998 From Chaos to Order: Methodologies, Perspectives and Applications (Singapore: World Scientific) pp21-134
[2] [3] Aguirre L A, Letellier C 2009 Math. Probl. Eng. 2009 1Google Scholar
[4] Ahmad T A, Sundarapandian V 2015 Chaos Modeling and Control Systems Design (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp59-72
[5] [6] Mattera D, Haykin S 1999 Advances in Kernel Methods: Support vector learning (Cambridge: MIT Press) p211
[7] Ishii S, Sato M A 2001 Neural Networks 14 1239Google Scholar
[8] Zhang Z, Wang T, Liu X 2014 Neurocomputing 131 368Google Scholar
[9] 李瑞国, 张宏立, 范文慧, 王雅 2015 64 200506Google Scholar
Li R G, Zhang H L, Fan W H, Wang Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 200506Google Scholar
[10] 王新迎, 韩敏 2015 64 070504Google Scholar
Wang X Y, Han M 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 070504Google Scholar
[11] Wen S, Zeng Z, Huang T, Chen Y 2013 Phys. Lett. A 377 2016Google Scholar
[12] Miranian A, Abdollahzade M 2013 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 24 207Google Scholar
[13] Shaw P K, Saha D, Ghosh S, Janaki M S, Lyengar A S 2015 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 78 285Google Scholar
[14] Billings S A, Coca D 1999 Int. J. Bifurcat.Chaos 9 1263Google Scholar
[15] Sanchez L, Infante S 2013 Chil. J. Stat. 4 35
[16] Aguirre L A, Teixeira B O S, Torres L A B 2005 Phys. Rev. E 72 026226Google Scholar
[17] 李军, 董海鹰 2008 57 4756Google Scholar
Li J, Dong H Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4756Google Scholar
[18] Huang G B, Zhu Q Y, Siew C K 2006 Neurocomputing 70 489Google Scholar
[19] Liang N Y, Huang G B, Saratchandran P, Sundararajan N 2006 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17 1411Google Scholar
[20] Scardapane S, Comminiello D, Scarpiniti M, Uncini A 2015 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 26 2214
[21] Vaerenbergh S V, Santamaria I, Liu W, Principe J C 2010 The 35th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech & Signal Processing Dallas, Texas, USA, March 14-19, 2010 p1882
[22] Liu W, Principe J C, Haykin S 2010 Kernel Adaptive Filtering: A Comprehensive Introduction pp108-110
[23] Engel Y, Mannor S, Meir R 2004 IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 52 2275Google Scholar
[24] se Kruif B J, de Vries T J A 2003 IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14 696Google Scholar
[25] Ueda Y 1985 Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 20 481Google Scholar
[26] Yang Z, Gao Y, Gao Y, Zhang J 2009 Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 060506Google Scholar
[27] Odavic J, Mali P, Tekic J, Pantic M, Pavkov-Hrvojevic M 2017 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 47 100Google Scholar
[28] Suykens J A K, Vandewalle J 1995 IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Fund. Theor. Appl. 42 499Google Scholar
[29] Cannas B, Cincotti S, Marchesi M, Pilo F 2001 Chaos Soliton. Fract. 12 2109Google Scholar
[30] Aguirre L A, Rodrigues G G, Mendes E M 1997 Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 7 1411Google Scholar
[31] Kennedy M P 1992 Frequenz 46 66Google Scholar
[32] Timmer J, Rust H, Horbelt W, Voss H U 2000 Phys. Lett. A 274 123Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6950
- PDF Downloads: 83
- Cited By: 0