-
Ground based airglow imaging interferometer (GBAⅡ) prototype made by our group is used to successfully detect the atmospheric wind velocity and temperature at the altituded of 90-100 km. In order to improve GBAⅡ's velocity accuracy, its calibrations are studied in this paper where covered are the calibration of imaging interference fringe center position, CCD dark noise and flat field, the decay coefficient of GBAⅡ's optical system, the phase step length, GBAⅡ's optical path difference with the angle of incidence, GBAⅡ instrument response and the zero wind speed phase calibration, etc. The theoretical and experimental researches of calibration show the following conclusions. The fringe center coordinates by shooting 30 imaging interference fringes are confirmed on the pixel of CCD (123.3, 121.1) by using the least squares method; by 632.8 nm laser for the CCD flat field calibration, the parameters of CCD's flat field coefficients, dark intensity, dead pixels and the imaging interference fringes before and after flat field are all obtained, respectively; the comparison between GBAⅡ's one edge fringe bright whose incidence angle of 10.24 and the center fringe bright whose incidence angle of 0 shows that the edge fringe phase is stepped by 0.356 fringes relative to the center fringe. After taking the sample of 200 imaging interference fringes, from the sine fit curve of the phase step interval at an incident angle of 10.24, the fitted root mean square (RMS) deviation is obtained to be 90.34% and the step interval of 4.06 nm for one interference fringes is corresponding to the stepped phase of 0.0094up; According to the forward formula, GBAⅡ's system decay coefficient calibration is performed after taking imaging interference fringes by IDL programming, the RMS deviation of fitted curve is 99.98%; GBAⅡ's response is 4.9710-3 counts (Rayleigh)-1 from the 632.8 nm laser experiment; GBAⅡ's zero wind speed calibration phases are obtained to be -9.2442 and -68.6353 for the 532.0 nm and 632.8 nm lasers for the outdoor experiment, respectively. This paper provides a series of calibration methods for GBAⅡ and these methods are all verifies experimentally. These calibration methods can support the upper atmospheric wind field passive measurement.
-
Keywords:
- calibration /
- upper atmospheric wind field /
- phase
[1] Pancheva D, Mitchell N J, Hagan M E, Manson A H, Meek C E, Luo Y 2002 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr Phys. 64 1011
[2] Sargoytchev S I, Brown S, Solheim B H 2004 Appl. Phys. 43 5712
[3] Shepherd G G, Thuillier G, Gault W A 1993 J. Geophys. Res. 98 10725
[4] Hays P B, Abreu V J, Dobbs M E 1993 J. Geophys. Res. 98 10713
[5] Ward W E, Power A, Langille J 2008 37th COSPAR Scientific Assembly 3424
[6] Harlander J M, Englert C R, Babcock D D 2010 Opt. Express 18 26430
[7] [2008]
[8] Yuan W, Xu J Y, Wu Y F, Bian J C, Chen H B 2009 Adv. Space Res. 43 1364
[9] Shuai J, Huang C M, Zhang S D, Yi F, Huang K M, Gan Q, Gong Y 2014 Chin. J. Geophys. 57 2465 (in Chinese)[帅晶, 黄春明, 张绍东, 易帆, 黄开明, 甘泉, 龚韵 2014 地球 57 2465]
[10] Shuai J, Huang C M, Zhang S D, Yi F, Huang K M, Gan Q, Gong Y 2014 Chin. J. Geophys. 57 2465 (in Chinese)[帅晶, 黄春明, 张绍东, 易帆, 黄开明, 甘泉, 龚韵 2014 地球 57 2465])
[11] Tang Y H, Zhang C M, Liu H C, Chen G D, He J 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4065 (in Chinese)[唐远河, 张淳民, 刘汉臣, 陈光德, 贺健 2005 54 4065]
[12] Zhang X N, Zhang C M, Ai J J 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 030701 (in Chinese)[张宣妮, 张淳民, 艾晶晶 2013 62 030701]
[13] Gao H Y, Hua D X, Tang Y H, Cao X G, Jia W L 2013 Opt. Commun. 292 36
[14] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X 2011 JQSRT 112 268
[15] Tang Y H, Qin L, Gao H Y, Zhu C, Wang D Y 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 2672
[16] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X, Liu H C, Cao X G, Duan X D, Jia Q J, Qu O Y, Wu Y 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 8650
[17] Tang Y H, Duan X D, Gao H Y, Qu O Y, Jia Q J, Cao X G, Wei S N, Yang R 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 2272
[18] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X, Liu H C 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 5655
[19] Wang J, Cui M, Lu H, Wang L, Yan Q, Liu J J, Hua D X 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 089202 (in Chinese)[王骏, 崔萌, 陆红, 汪丽, 闫庆, 刘晶晶, 华灯鑫 2017 66 089202]
[20] Sun Y W, Liu W Q, Xie P H, Chan J L, Zeng Y, Xu J, Li A, Si F Q, Li X X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 140705 (in Chinese)[孙友文, 刘文清, 谢品华, 陈嘉乐, 曾议, 徐晋, 李昂, 司福祺, 李先欣 2012 61 140705]
-
[1] Pancheva D, Mitchell N J, Hagan M E, Manson A H, Meek C E, Luo Y 2002 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr Phys. 64 1011
[2] Sargoytchev S I, Brown S, Solheim B H 2004 Appl. Phys. 43 5712
[3] Shepherd G G, Thuillier G, Gault W A 1993 J. Geophys. Res. 98 10725
[4] Hays P B, Abreu V J, Dobbs M E 1993 J. Geophys. Res. 98 10713
[5] Ward W E, Power A, Langille J 2008 37th COSPAR Scientific Assembly 3424
[6] Harlander J M, Englert C R, Babcock D D 2010 Opt. Express 18 26430
[7] [2008]
[8] Yuan W, Xu J Y, Wu Y F, Bian J C, Chen H B 2009 Adv. Space Res. 43 1364
[9] Shuai J, Huang C M, Zhang S D, Yi F, Huang K M, Gan Q, Gong Y 2014 Chin. J. Geophys. 57 2465 (in Chinese)[帅晶, 黄春明, 张绍东, 易帆, 黄开明, 甘泉, 龚韵 2014 地球 57 2465]
[10] Shuai J, Huang C M, Zhang S D, Yi F, Huang K M, Gan Q, Gong Y 2014 Chin. J. Geophys. 57 2465 (in Chinese)[帅晶, 黄春明, 张绍东, 易帆, 黄开明, 甘泉, 龚韵 2014 地球 57 2465])
[11] Tang Y H, Zhang C M, Liu H C, Chen G D, He J 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4065 (in Chinese)[唐远河, 张淳民, 刘汉臣, 陈光德, 贺健 2005 54 4065]
[12] Zhang X N, Zhang C M, Ai J J 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 030701 (in Chinese)[张宣妮, 张淳民, 艾晶晶 2013 62 030701]
[13] Gao H Y, Hua D X, Tang Y H, Cao X G, Jia W L 2013 Opt. Commun. 292 36
[14] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X 2011 JQSRT 112 268
[15] Tang Y H, Qin L, Gao H Y, Zhu C, Wang D Y 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 2672
[16] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X, Liu H C, Cao X G, Duan X D, Jia Q J, Qu O Y, Wu Y 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 8650
[17] Tang Y H, Duan X D, Gao H Y, Qu O Y, Jia Q J, Cao X G, Wei S N, Yang R 2014 Appl. Opt. 53 2272
[18] Gao H Y, Tang Y H, Hua D X, Liu H C 2011 Appl. Opt. 50 5655
[19] Wang J, Cui M, Lu H, Wang L, Yan Q, Liu J J, Hua D X 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 089202 (in Chinese)[王骏, 崔萌, 陆红, 汪丽, 闫庆, 刘晶晶, 华灯鑫 2017 66 089202]
[20] Sun Y W, Liu W Q, Xie P H, Chan J L, Zeng Y, Xu J, Li A, Si F Q, Li X X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 140705 (in Chinese)[孙友文, 刘文清, 谢品华, 陈嘉乐, 曾议, 徐晋, 李昂, 司福祺, 李先欣 2012 61 140705]
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5670
- PDF Downloads: 153
- Cited By: 0