过渡金属元素掺杂对磁铁矿磁矩及磁各向异性的调控

任延英; 李雅宁; 柳洪盛; 徐楠; 郭坤; 徐朝辉; 陈鑫; 高峻峰

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231744

摘要

磁性 Fe₃O₄ 纳米粒子在纳米医学领域展现出巨大的应用前景. 饱和磁化强度和磁各向异性对于 Fe₃O₄ 纳米粒子在药物输送和磁热疗中的应用至关重要. 在此, 通过密度泛函理论计算, 仔细研究了 3d 和 4d 过渡金属元素的掺杂对 Fe₃O₄ 磁矩及磁各向异性的影响. 结果表明, Fe₃O₄中Zn和Cd的掺杂会增大总磁矩, 而其他3d和4d过渡金属元素的掺杂会降低总磁矩. 有趣的是, Cd 的掺杂也会大大增大磁各向异性. 本文结果表明, 掺杂 Cd 是提高 Fe₃O₄ 作为药物输送和磁热疗材料性能的可行方法.

关键词:

Abstract

Magnetic Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles show promising applications in nanomedicine. The saturation magnetization (M_S) and magnetic anisotropy are critical for the applications of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in drug delivery and magnetic hyperthermia. Here, by density functional computation, the doping effects of 3d and 4d transition metal elements (including Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag and Cd) on the magnetic properties of Fe₃O₄ are investigated in-depth. A conventional cell of Fe₃O₄, containing 24 Fe atoms and 32 O atoms, has been used to investigate the doping of group III elements. One 3d or 4d atom is doped in one conventional cell of Fe₃O₄, resulting in the formation of X_0.125Fe_2.875O₄ where X represents the dopant. The results show that the doping of most 3d and 4d transition metal elements will reduce the total magnetic moment, while the doping of Ag, Zn and Cd in Fe₃O₄ will increase the total magnetic moment by 19%–22%. However, it is hard to dope Ag into Fe₃O₄ according to the positive formation energy. Therefore, Zn and Cd are good candidates to improve the M_S of Fe₃O₄. The doping of Zn and Cd has also an influence on the magnetic anisotropy of Fe₃O₄. For Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, the magnetic anisotropy energy is about 0.25 meV per cell, which is slightly larger than that of intrinsic Fe₃O₄ (0.2 meV per cell). Interestingly, the doping of Cd (Cd_0.125Fe_2.875O₄) will greatly increase the magnetic anisotropy energy to 0.8 meV per cell, which is significant for the specific absorption rate in the magnetic hyperthermia application. In addition, the doping of Zn and Cd will not induce any defect states in the band gap according to the density of states. Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄ and Cd_0.125Fe_2.875O₄ are both semiconducting and both the top of valence band and the bottom of conduction band originate from octahedral Fe. This is because the impurity states are very deep in energy. Our research results show that doping Cd is a feasible way to improve the performance of Fe₃O₄ as a material for drug delivery and magnetic hyperthermia.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
大连医科大学附属第二医院, 大连　116024

2.
大连理工大学物理学院, 大连　116024

通信作者: 陈鑫, chenxincjz@gmail.com ; 高峻峰, gaojf@dlut.edu.cn

基金项目: 大连医科大学附属第二医院交叉学科创新项目(批准号: 2022JCXKYB21, 2022JCXKYB01)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 123374174, 12374253, 12004064, 12074053)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(批准号: DUT22LK11, DUT22QN207)和DUT-BSU联合研究所国际合作研究基金(批准号: ICR2202)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116024, China

2.
Department of Physics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Corresponding author: Chen Xin, chenxincjz@gmail.com ; Gao Jun-Feng, gaojf@dlut.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Interdisciplinary Innovation Project of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China (Grant Nos. 2022JCXKYB21, 2022JCXKYB01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 123374174, 12374253, 12004064, 12074053), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Grant Nos. DUT22LK11, DUT22QN207), and the Research Fund for International Cooperation of DUT-BSU Joint Institute, China (Grant No. ICR2202).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Perez J M, Josephson L, O'Loughlin T, Högemann D, Weissleder R 2002 Nat. Biotechnol. 20 816 Google Scholar
[2]	Liu J, Sun Z, Deng Y, Zou Y, Li C, Guo X, Xiong L, Gao Y, Li F, Zhao D 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 5875 Google Scholar
[3]	Wu W, Wu Z, Yu T, Jiang C, Kim W S 2015 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16 023501 Google Scholar
[4]	Martinkova P, Brtnicky M, Kynicky J, Pohanka M 2018 Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7 1700932 Google Scholar
[5]	Pankhurst Q A, Thanh N T K, Jones S K, Dobson J 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 224001 Google Scholar
[6]	Gupta A K, Gupta M 2005 Biomaterials 26 3995 Google Scholar
[7]	Sun C, Lee J S H, Zhang M 2008 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 60 1252 Google Scholar
[8]	Pankhurst Q A, Connolly J, Jones S K, Dobson J 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 R167 Google Scholar
[9]	Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller R N 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 2064 Google Scholar
[10]	Colombo M, Carregal-Romero S, Casula M F, Gutiérrez L, Morales M P, Böhm I B, Heverhagen J T, Prosperi D, Parak W J 2012 Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 4306 Google Scholar
[11]	Mitchell M J, Billingsley M M, Haley R M, Wechsler M E, Peppas N A, Langer R 2021 Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20 101 Google Scholar
[12]	Dilnawaz F, Singh A, Mohanty C, Sahoo S K 2010 Biomaterials 31 3694 Google Scholar
[13]	Wang Y, Zhao R B, Wang S B, Liu Z M, Tang R K 2016 Biomaterials 75 71 Google Scholar
[14]	Liao S H, Liu C H, Bastakoti B P, Suzuki N, Chang Y, Yamauchi Y, Lin F H, Wu K C 2015 Int. J. Nanomed. 10 3315
[15]	Rajan A, Sharma M, Sahu N K 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 15045 Google Scholar
[16]	Sun S, Zeng H 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 8204 Google Scholar
[17]	Hou Y, Yu J, Gao S 2003 J. Mater. Chem. 13 1983 Google Scholar
[18]	Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson D B, Raoux S, Rice P M, Wang S X, Li G 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 273 Google Scholar
[19]	Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park J G, Noh H J, Kim J Y, Park J H, Hwang N M, Hyeon T 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 891 Google Scholar
[20]	Tian Y, Yu B B, Li X, Li K 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 2476 Google Scholar
[21]	Kovalenko M V, Bodnarchuk M I, Lechner R T, Hesser G, Schäffler F, Heiss W 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 6352 Google Scholar
[22]	Yang H, Ogawa T, Hasegawa D, Takahashi M 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 07D526 Google Scholar
[23]	Kim D, Lee N, Park M, Kim B H, An K, Hyeon T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 454 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao L, Duan L 2010 Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010 5635 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang L H, Wu J J, Liao H B, Hou Y L, Gao S 2009 Chem. Commun. 29 4378
[26]	Li X, Liu D, Song S, Wang X, Ge X, Zhang H 2011 CrystEngComm 13 6017
[27]	Cheng X L, Jiang J S, Jiang D M, Zhao Z J 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 12588 Google Scholar
[28]	Zheng R K, Gu H, Xu B, Fung K K, Zhang X X, Ringer S P 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 2418 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhao L J, Zhang H J, Xing Y, Song S Y, Yu S Y, Shi W D, Guo X M, Yang J H, Lei Y Q, Cao F 2008 Chem. Mat. 20 198 Google Scholar
[30]	Woo K, Hong J, Choi S, Lee H W, Ahn J P, Kim C S, Lee S W 2004 Chem. Mat. 16 2814 Google Scholar
[31]	Li Q, Kartikowati C W, Horie S, Ogi T, Iwaki T, Okuyama K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 9894 Google Scholar
[32]	Liu J, Bin Y, Matsuo M 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 134 Google Scholar
[33]	Ahghari M R, Amiri-khamakani Z, Maleki A 2023 Sci. Rep. 13 1007 Google Scholar
[34]	Qi Z L, Joshi T P, Liu R P, Liu H J, Qu J H 2017 J. Hazard. Mater. 329 193 Google Scholar
[35]	Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169 Google Scholar
[36]	Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[37]	Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865 Google Scholar
[38]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 25736 Google Scholar
[39]	Dovesi R, Orlando R, Erba A, Zicovich-Wilson C M, Civalleri B, Casassa S, Maschio L, Ferrabone M, De La Pierre M, D'Arco P, Noël Y, Causà M, Rérat M, Kirtman B 2014 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114 1287 Google Scholar
[40]	Krukau A V, Vydrov O A, Izmaylov A F, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 224106 Google Scholar
[41]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2018 Nanoscale 10 11021
[42]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 186101 Google Scholar
[43]	Hay P J, Wadt W R 1985 J. Chem. Phys. 82 299 Google Scholar
[44]	Durand P, Barthelat J C 1975 Theor. Chim. Acta 38 283 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a) 完美 Fe₃O₄, (b) Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, (c) V_0.125Fe_2.875O₄和(d) Y_0.125Fe_2.875O₄的优化结构(数据来源于CRYSTAL17的杂化泛函计算)

Fig. 1. Optimized structures of (a) perfect Fe₃O₄, (b) Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, (c) V_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, and (d) Y_0.125Fe_2.875O₄ (data is from HSE calculation with CRYSTAL17).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 掺杂不同过渡金属元素的Fe₃O₄的总磁矩(数据来源于CRYSTAL17的杂化泛函计算)

Fig. 2. Total magnetic moment of Fe₃O₄ doped with different transition metal elements (data is from HSE calculation with CRYSTAL17).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 本征和掺杂的 Fe₃O₄ 的磁各向异性, 图中横坐标为不同的磁化方向, 磁化轴从[001]方向开始沿着(1, –1, 0)面旋转到[111]方向, 中间均匀取7个数据点, 再从[111]方向沿着(1, –1, 0)面旋转到[110]方向, 中间也均匀取7个数据点(数据来源于VASP的PBE + U计算)

Fig. 3. Magnetic anisotropy of Fe₃O₄ with and without doping. The abscissas in the figure represent different magnetization directions. The magnetization axis starts from the [001] direction and rotates along the (1, –1, 0) plane to the [111] direction. Seven data points are evenly taken in the middle, and then the magnetization axis rotates from the [111] direction along the (1, –1, 0) plane to the [110] direction, and 7data points are evenly taken in the middle (data is from PBE + U calculation with VASP).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a) 未掺杂的完美 Fe₃O₄, (b) Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, (c) Cd_0.125Fe_2.875O₄ 的投影态密度, 费米能级归零, 如黑色虚线所示(数据来源于CRYSTAL17的杂化泛函计算)

Fig. 4. Projected density of states of (a) perfect Fe₃O₄ without doping, (b) Zn_0.125Fe_2.875O₄, (c) Cd_0.125Fe_2.875O₄. The legend of colors is on the top, the Fermi level is scaled to zero as indicated by the dashed black lines (data is from HSE calculation with CRYSTAL17).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 过渡金属掺杂Fe₃O₄的能量差ΔE = E_T – E_O, 其中E_T和E_O分别表示掺杂剂取代四面体 Fe 和八面体 Fe 的掺杂 Fe₃O₄ 的总能量(数据来源于CRYSTAL17的杂化泛函计算)

Table 1. Energy difference ΔE = E_T – E_O for transition metal doped Fe₃O₄, where E_T and E_O represent the total energy of doped Fe₃O₄ with the dopant replacing tetrahedral Fe and octahedral Fe, respectively (data is from HSE calculation with CRYSTAL17).

杂质	Sc	Ti	V	Cr	Mn	Co	Ni	Cu	Zn
ΔE /eV	0.70	0.10	0.37	1.48	0.10	0.13	0.95	0.19	–0.14

杂质	Y	Zr	Nb	Mo	Tc	Ru	Rh	Pd	Ag	Cd
ΔE /eV	4.23	0.13	0.01	0.72	2.14	2.27	1.31	0.96	–0.29	–0.32

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 过渡金属掺杂 Fe₃O₄ 的形成能 E_f (数据来源于VASP的PBE + U计算)

Table 2. Formation energy E_f of transition metal doped Fe₃O₄ (data is from PBE + U calculation with VASP).

杂质	Sc	Ti	V	Cr	Mn	Co	Ni	Cu	Zn
E_f /eV	–6.45	–5.75	–4.94	–4.97	–3.72	–2.09	–1.69	0.21	–1.93

杂质	Y	Zr	Nb	Mo	Tc	Ru	Rh	Pd	Ag	Cd
E_f /eV	–5.42	–6.09	–5.23	–2.60	–2.18	–1.00	–0.62	0.54	1.12	–0.61

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 Fe₃O₄掺杂时3d和4d过渡金属原子的原子磁矩(m)(数据来源于CRYSTAL17的杂化泛函计算)

Table 3. Atomic magnetic moment (m) of 3d and 4d transition metal atoms when doped in Fe₃O₄ (data is from HSE calculation with CRYSTAL17).

杂质	Sc	Ti	V	Cr	Mn	Co	Ni	Cu	Zn
m/μ_B	–0.06	–0.12	–2.02	–3.05	–4.76	–2.76	–1.78	0.01	0.07

杂质	Y	Zr	Nb	Mo	Tc	Ru	Rh	Pd	Ag	Cd
m/μ_B	–0.09	–0.22	–0.52	–2.66	–1.91	0.11	–0.09	1.30	0.12	0.07

下载: 导出CSV

map

[1]	Perez J M, Josephson L, O'Loughlin T, Högemann D, Weissleder R 2002 Nat. Biotechnol. 20 816 Google Scholar
[2]	Liu J, Sun Z, Deng Y, Zou Y, Li C, Guo X, Xiong L, Gao Y, Li F, Zhao D 2009 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 5875 Google Scholar
[3]	Wu W, Wu Z, Yu T, Jiang C, Kim W S 2015 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16 023501 Google Scholar
[4]	Martinkova P, Brtnicky M, Kynicky J, Pohanka M 2018 Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7 1700932 Google Scholar
[5]	Pankhurst Q A, Thanh N T K, Jones S K, Dobson J 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 224001 Google Scholar
[6]	Gupta A K, Gupta M 2005 Biomaterials 26 3995 Google Scholar
[7]	Sun C, Lee J S H, Zhang M 2008 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 60 1252 Google Scholar
[8]	Pankhurst Q A, Connolly J, Jones S K, Dobson J 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 R167 Google Scholar
[9]	Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller R N 2008 Chem. Rev. 108 2064 Google Scholar
[10]	Colombo M, Carregal-Romero S, Casula M F, Gutiérrez L, Morales M P, Böhm I B, Heverhagen J T, Prosperi D, Parak W J 2012 Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 4306 Google Scholar
[11]	Mitchell M J, Billingsley M M, Haley R M, Wechsler M E, Peppas N A, Langer R 2021 Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20 101 Google Scholar
[12]	Dilnawaz F, Singh A, Mohanty C, Sahoo S K 2010 Biomaterials 31 3694 Google Scholar
[13]	Wang Y, Zhao R B, Wang S B, Liu Z M, Tang R K 2016 Biomaterials 75 71 Google Scholar
[14]	Liao S H, Liu C H, Bastakoti B P, Suzuki N, Chang Y, Yamauchi Y, Lin F H, Wu K C 2015 Int. J. Nanomed. 10 3315
[15]	Rajan A, Sharma M, Sahu N K 2020 Sci. Rep. 10 15045 Google Scholar
[16]	Sun S, Zeng H 2002 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 8204 Google Scholar
[17]	Hou Y, Yu J, Gao S 2003 J. Mater. Chem. 13 1983 Google Scholar
[18]	Sun S, Zeng H, Robinson D B, Raoux S, Rice P M, Wang S X, Li G 2004 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 273 Google Scholar
[19]	Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park J G, Noh H J, Kim J Y, Park J H, Hwang N M, Hyeon T 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 891 Google Scholar
[20]	Tian Y, Yu B B, Li X, Li K 2011 J. Mater. Chem. 21 2476 Google Scholar
[21]	Kovalenko M V, Bodnarchuk M I, Lechner R T, Hesser G, Schäffler F, Heiss W 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 6352 Google Scholar
[22]	Yang H, Ogawa T, Hasegawa D, Takahashi M 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 07D526 Google Scholar
[23]	Kim D, Lee N, Park M, Kim B H, An K, Hyeon T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 454 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao L, Duan L 2010 Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010 5635 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang L H, Wu J J, Liao H B, Hou Y L, Gao S 2009 Chem. Commun. 29 4378
[26]	Li X, Liu D, Song S, Wang X, Ge X, Zhang H 2011 CrystEngComm 13 6017
[27]	Cheng X L, Jiang J S, Jiang D M, Zhao Z J 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 12588 Google Scholar
[28]	Zheng R K, Gu H, Xu B, Fung K K, Zhang X X, Ringer S P 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 2418 Google Scholar
[29]	Zhao L J, Zhang H J, Xing Y, Song S Y, Yu S Y, Shi W D, Guo X M, Yang J H, Lei Y Q, Cao F 2008 Chem. Mat. 20 198 Google Scholar
[30]	Woo K, Hong J, Choi S, Lee H W, Ahn J P, Kim C S, Lee S W 2004 Chem. Mat. 16 2814 Google Scholar
[31]	Li Q, Kartikowati C W, Horie S, Ogi T, Iwaki T, Okuyama K 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 9894 Google Scholar
[32]	Liu J, Bin Y, Matsuo M 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 134 Google Scholar
[33]	Ahghari M R, Amiri-khamakani Z, Maleki A 2023 Sci. Rep. 13 1007 Google Scholar
[34]	Qi Z L, Joshi T P, Liu R P, Liu H J, Qu J H 2017 J. Hazard. Mater. 329 193 Google Scholar
[35]	Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169 Google Scholar
[36]	Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
[37]	Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865 Google Scholar
[38]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 25736 Google Scholar
[39]	Dovesi R, Orlando R, Erba A, Zicovich-Wilson C M, Civalleri B, Casassa S, Maschio L, Ferrabone M, De La Pierre M, D'Arco P, Noël Y, Causà M, Rérat M, Kirtman B 2014 Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114 1287 Google Scholar
[40]	Krukau A V, Vydrov O A, Izmaylov A F, Scuseria G E 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 224106 Google Scholar
[41]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2018 Nanoscale 10 11021
[42]	Liu H, Di Valentin C 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 186101 Google Scholar
[43]	Hay P J, Wadt W R 1985 J. Chem. Phys. 82 299 Google Scholar
[44]	Durand P, Barthelat J C 1975 Theor. Chim. Acta 38 283 Google Scholar

[1]	孟婧, 冯心薇, 邵倾蓉, 赵佳鹏, 谢亚丽, 何为, 詹清峰. 具有不同交换偏置方向的外延FeGa/IrMn双层膜的磁各向异性与磁化翻转. , 2022, 71(12): 127501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220166
[2]	黄玉昊, 张贵涛, 王如倩, 陈乾, 王金兰. 二维双金属铁磁半导体CrMoI₆的电子结构与稳定性. , 2021, 70(20): 207301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210949
[3]	文林, 胡爱元. 双二次交换作用和各向异性对反铁磁体相变温度的影响. , 2020, 69(10): 107501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200077
[4]	罗强, 杨恒, 郭平, 赵建飞. N型甲烷水合物结构和电子性质的密度泛函理论计算. , 2019, 68(16): 169101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182230
[5]	张陈俊, 王养丽, 陈朝康. InCn+(n=110)团簇的密度泛函理论研究. , 2018, 67(11): 113101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172662
[6]	李哲夫, 贾彦彦, 刘仁多, 徐玉海, 王光宏, 夏晓彬. Sm2Co17型永磁合金的辐照效应研究. , 2017, 66(22): 226101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.226101
[7]	王雅静, 李桂霞, 王治华, 宫立基, 王秀芳. Imogolite类纳米管直径单分散性密度泛函理论研究. , 2016, 65(4): 048101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.048101
[8]	肖嘉星, 鲁军, 朱礼军, 赵建华. 垂直磁各向异性L10-Mn1.67Ga超薄膜分子束外延生长与磁性研究. , 2016, 65(11): 118105. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.118105
[9]	温俊青, 张建民, 姚攀, 周红, 王俊斐. PdnAl(n=18)二元团簇的密度泛函理论研究. , 2014, 63(11): 113101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.113101
[10]	温俊青, 夏涛, 王俊斐. PtnAl (n=18)小团簇的密度泛函理论研究. , 2014, 63(2): 023103. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.023103
[11]	聂帅华, 朱礼军, 潘东, 鲁军, 赵建华. 分子束外延制备的垂直易磁化MnAl薄膜结构和磁性. , 2013, 62(17): 178103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.178103
[12]	解晓东, 郝玉英, 章日光, 王宝俊. Li掺杂8-羟基喹啉铝的密度泛函理论研究. , 2012, 61(12): 127201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.127201
[13]	陈家洛, 狄国庆. 磁各向异性热电效应对自旋相关器件的影响. , 2012, 61(20): 207201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.207201
[14]	金蓉, 谌晓洪. 密度泛函理论对ZrnPd团簇结构和性质的研究. , 2010, 59(10): 6955-6962. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6955
[15]	张辉, 曾德长. Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe2单晶中巨磁致伸缩的逆效应. , 2010, 59(4): 2808-2814. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2808
[16]	杨培芳, 胡娟梅, 滕波涛, 吴锋民, 蒋仕宇. Rh在单壁碳纳米管上吸附的密度泛函理论研究. , 2009, 58(5): 3331-3337. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3331
[17]	郭玉献, 王劼, 徐彭寿, 李红红, 蔡建旺. Co0.9Fe0.1薄膜面内元素分辨的磁各向异性. , 2007, 56(2): 1121-1126. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1121
[18]	曾振华, 邓辉球, 李微雪, 胡望宇. O在Au(111)表面吸附的密度泛函理论研究. , 2006, 55(6): 3157-3164. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3157
[19]	叶贞成, 蔡钧, 张书令, 刘洪来, 胡英. 方阱链流体在固液界面分布的密度泛函理论研究. , 2005, 54(9): 4044-4052. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4044
[20]	李锐鹏, 王　劼, 李红红, 郭玉献, 王锋, 胡志伟. 软x射线磁性圆二色吸收谱研究铁单晶薄膜的面内磁各向异性. , 2005, 54(8): 3851-3855. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3851

计量

文章访问数: 1979
PDF下载量: 73
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板