生物大分子过渡态搜索算法及其中的机器学习

杨建宇; 席昆; 竺立哲

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20231319

摘要

过渡态是物理化学家理解和调控生物大分子相关功能微观机制的关键. 因其存在时间极短, 难以被实验手段捕捉, 全面刻画其结构必须通过物理定律驱动的模拟计算搜索予以实现. 然而, 与化学反应过程只涉及少量原子不同, 生物大分子的功能性构象变化所涉的原子和坐标数量巨大, 搜索其过渡态将不可避免地遭遇维数灾难, 即反应坐标问题, 因而催生了多种应对策略和算法. 同时, 随着近年来新型机器学习算法的大量涌现和日臻成熟, 融入机器学习范式的过渡态搜索算法也已出现. 本文首先回顾和梳理过渡态搜索代表性算法的设计思想, 包括依赖集合变量的温和爬升动力学(gentlest ascent dynamics, GAD)、有限温度弦方法(finite temperature string, FTS)、快速断层扫描法(fast tomographic)、基于旅行商的自动路径搜索算法TAPS, 以及过渡路径采样法(transition path sampling, TPS). 然后, 重点介绍TPS与强化学习融合而成的新型路径采样算法, 解析强化学习在其中的作用, 并厘清其适用场景. 最后, 我们提出一种将降维算法与GAD深度融合的新构想, 讨论研发可保留过渡态信息的新型降维算法的必要性及可行性.

关键词:

Abstract

Transition state is a key concept for chemists to understand and fine-tune the conformational changes of large biomolecules. Due to its short residence time, it is difficult to capture a transition state via experimental techniques. Characterizing transition states for a conformational change therefore is only achievable via physics-driven molecular dynamics simulations. However, unlike chemical reactions which involve only a small number of atoms, conformational changes of biomolecules depend on numerous atoms and therefore the number of their coordinates in our 3D space. The searching for their transition states will inevitably encounter the curse of dimensionality, i.e. the reaction coordinate problem, which invokes the invention of various algorithms for solution. Recent years, new machine learning techniques and the incorporation of some of them into the transition state searching methods emerged. Here, we first review the design principle of representative transition state searching algorithms, including the collective-variable (CV)-dependent gentlest ascent dynamics, finite temperature string, fast tomographic, travelling-salesman based automated path searching, and the CV-independent transition path sampling. Then, we focus on the new version of TPS that incorporates reinforcement learning for efficient sampling, and we also clarify the suitable situation for its application. Finally, we propose a new paradigm for transition state searching, a new dimensionality reduction technique that preserves transition state information and combines gentlest ascent dynamics.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

香港中文大学(深圳)医学院, 瓦谢尔计算生物研究院, 深圳　518172

通信作者: 竺立哲, zhulizhe@cuhk.edu.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 31971179)和深圳市科技创新委员会(批准号: JCYJ20200109150003938, RCYX20200714114645019)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China

Corresponding author: Zhu Li-Zhe, zhulizhe@cuhk.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31971179) and the Science Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, China (Grant Nos. JCYJ20200109150003938, RCYX20200714114645019).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Edman L, Földes-Papp Z, Wennmalm S, Rigler R 1999 Chem. Phys. 247 11 Google Scholar
[2]	Evenäs J, Malmendal A, Thulin E, Carlstrӧm G, Forsén S 1998 Biochemistry 37 13744 Google Scholar
[3]	Hanson J A, Duderstadt K, Watkins L P, Bhattacharyya S, Brokaw J B, Chu J W, Yang H 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 18055 Google Scholar
[4]	Moffat K 1989 Annu. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 18 309 Google Scholar
[5]	Huang C, Kalodimos C G 2017 Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46 317 Google Scholar
[6]	Weissenberger G, Henderikx R J M, Peters P J 2021 Nat. Methods 18 463 Google Scholar
[7]	Clegg R M 1995 Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6 103 Google Scholar
[8]	Karplus M, McCammon J A 2002 Nat. Struct. Biol. 9 646 Google Scholar
[9]	Hollingsworth S A, Dror R O 2018 Neuron 99 1129 Google Scholar
[10]	Bernèche S, Roux B 2001 Nature 414 73 Google Scholar
[11]	Khafizov K, Perez C, Koshy C, Quick M, Fendler K, Ziegler C, Forrest L R 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 E3035 Google Scholar
[12]	Li J, Shaikh S A, Enkavi G, Wen P C, Huang Z, Tajkhorshid E 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 7696 Google Scholar
[13]	Dror, R O, Green H F, Valant C, Borhani D W, Valcourt J R, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Canals M, Lane J R, Rahmani R, Baell J B, Sexton P M, Christopoulos A, Shaw D E 2013 Nature 503 295 Google Scholar
[14]	Wacker D, Stevens R C, Roth B L 2017 a Cell 170 414 Google Scholar
[15]	Wacker D, Wang S, McCorvy J D, Betz R M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Levit A, Lansu K, Schools Z L, Che T, Nichols D E, Dror R O, Roth B L 2017 Cell 168 377 Google Scholar
[16]	McCorvy J D, Butler K V, Kelly B, Rechsteiner K, Karpiak J, Betz R M, Kormos B L, Shoichet B K, Dror R O, Jin J, Roth B L 2018 Nat. Chem. Biol. 14 126 Google Scholar
[17]	Provasi D, Artacho M C, Negri A, Mobarec J C, Filizola M 2011 PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 e1002193 Google Scholar
[18]	Cordero-Morales J F, Jogini V, Lewis A, Vásquez V, Cortes D M, Roux B, Perozo E 2007 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 1062 Google Scholar
[19]	Fields J B, Németh-Cahalan K L, Freites J A, Vorontsova I, Hall J E, Tobias D J 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 185 Google Scholar
[20]	Groban E S, Narayanan A, Jacobson M P 2006 PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 e32 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu Y, Ke M, Gong H 2015 Biophys. J. 109 542 Google Scholar
[22]	Delemotte L, Tarek M, Klein M L, Amaral C, Treptow W 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 6109 Google Scholar
[23]	Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2011 Science 334 517 Google Scholar
[24]	Snow C D, Nguyen H, Pande V S, Gruebele M 2002 Nature 420 102 Google Scholar
[25]	Dror R O, Arlow D H, Maragakis P, Mildorf T J, Pan A C, Xu H, Borhani D W, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 18684 Google Scholar
[26]	Dror R O, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Borhani D W, Maragakis P, Shan Y, Xu H, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 13118 Google Scholar
[27]	Gu Y, Shrivastava I H, Amara S G, Bahar I 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2589 Google Scholar
[28]	Latorraca N R, Fastman N M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Frommer W B, Dror R O, Feng L 2017 Cell 169 96 Google Scholar
[29]	Stelzl L S, Fowler P W, Sansom M S, Beckstein O 2014 J. Mol. Biol. 426 735 Google Scholar
[30]	Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 10184 Google Scholar
[31]	Liang R, Swanson J M J, Madsen J J, Hong M, DeGrado W F, Voth G A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 E6955 Google Scholar
[32]	Suomivuori C M, Gamiz-Hernandez A P, Sundholm D, Kaila V R I 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 7043 Google Scholar
[33]	Tajkhorshid E, Nollert P, Jensen M Ø, Miercke L J W, O’Connell J, Stroud R M, Schulten K 2002 Science 296 525 Google Scholar
[34]	Watanabe A, Choe S, Chaptal V, Rosenberg J M, Wright E M, Grabe M, Abramson J 2010 Nature 468 988 Google Scholar
[35]	Dedmon M M, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson C M 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 476 Google Scholar
[36]	Nguyen H D, Hall C K 2004 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 16180 Google Scholar
[37]	Levitt M 1983 J. Mol. Biol. 168 595 Google Scholar
[38]	Sugita Y, Okamoto Y 1999 Chem. Phys. Lett. 314 141 Google Scholar
[39]	Rhee Y M, Pande V S 2003 Biophys. J. 84 775 Google Scholar
[40]	Zhang W, Wu C, Duan Y 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 154105 Google Scholar
[41]	Zhou R 2006 Protein Folding Protocols (Humana Totowa, NJ: Springer) pp205−223
[42]	Sindhikara D, Meng Y, Roitberg A E 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 024103 Google Scholar
[43]	Buchete N V, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 030902 Google Scholar
[44]	Rosta E, Hummer G 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 165102 Google Scholar
[45]	Stelzl L S, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 3927 Google Scholar
[46]	Yang L J, Gao Q Y 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 214109 Google Scholar
[47]	Yang L, Liu C W, Shao Q, Zhang J, Gao Y Q 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 947 Google Scholar
[48]	Yang Y I, Zhang J, Che X, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 094105 Google Scholar
[49]	Yang Y I, Shao Q, Zhang J, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 070902 Google Scholar
[50]	Huber T, Torda A E, Van Gunsteren W F 1994 J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 8 695 Google Scholar
[51]	Wada T, Kuroda K, Yoshida Y, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Endo S 2006 Neurosurg. Rev. 29 242 Google Scholar
[52]	Hansen H S, Hünenberger P H 2010 J. Comput. Chem. 31 1 Google Scholar
[53]	Perić-Hassler L, Hansen H S, Baron R, Hünenberger P H 2010 Carbohydr. Res. 345 1781 Google Scholar
[54]	Grubmüller H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 2893 Google Scholar
[55]	Schulze B G, Grubmüller H, Evanseck J D 2000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 8700 Google Scholar
[56]	Bouvier B, Grubmüller H 2007 Biophys. J. 93 770 Google Scholar
[57]	Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M 2011 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1 826 Google Scholar
[58]	Tiwary P, Parrinello M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 230602 Google Scholar
[59]	Bussi G, Laio A 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 200 Google Scholar
[60]	Miao Y, Feher V A, McCammon J A 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3584 Google Scholar
[61]	Miao Y, McCammon J A 2017 Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 13 231 Google Scholar
[62]	Wang J, Arantes P R, Bhattarai A, et al. 2021 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 11 e1521 Google Scholar
[63]	Naritomi Y, Sotaro F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 065101 Google Scholar
[64]	Schwantes C R, Vijay S P 2013 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 2000 Google Scholar
[65]	Perez-Hernandez G, Paul F, Giorgino T, Fabritiis G D, Noé F 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 015102 Google Scholar
[66]	Bowman G R, Huang X H, Pande V S 2009 Methods 49 197 Google Scholar
[67]	Metzner P, Noé F, Schütte C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 021106 Google Scholar
[68]	Pande V S, Beauchamp K A, Bowman G R 2010 Methods 52 99 Google Scholar
[69]	Prinz J H, Wu H, Sarich M, Keller B, Senne M, Held M, Chodera J D, Schütte C, Noé F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 174105 Google Scholar
[70]	Kellogg E H, Lange O F, Baker D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 11405 Google Scholar
[71]	Yao Y, Cui R Z, Bowman G R, Silva D A, Sun J, Huang X H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 174106 Google Scholar
[72]	McGibbon R T, Schwantes C R, Pande V S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. B 118 6475 Google Scholar
[73]	Nuske F, Keller B G, Pérez-Hernández G, Mey A S J, Noé F 2014 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 1739 Google Scholar
[74]	Sheong F K, Silva D A, Meng L, Zhao Y, Huang X H 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 17 Google Scholar
[75]	Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Zeng X, Huang X H 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 30228 Google Scholar
[76]	Wang W, Cao S, Zhu L Z, Huang X H 2018 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 e1343 Google Scholar
[77]	Husic B E, Pande V S 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 2386 Google Scholar
[78]	Konovalov K A, Unarta I C, Cao S, Goonetilleke E C, Huang X H 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. Au. 1 1330 Google Scholar
[79]	E W, Zhou X 2011 Nonlinearity 24 1831 Google Scholar
[80]	Samanta A, Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 164109 Google Scholar
[81]	Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3235 Google Scholar
[82]	E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 052301 Google Scholar
[83]	E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 6688 Google Scholar
[84]	Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 024106 Google Scholar
[85]	Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 164103 Google Scholar
[86]	Maragliano L, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 182 Google Scholar
[87]	Pan A C, Sezer D, Roux B 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 3432 Google Scholar
[88]	Chen C, Huang Y, Xiao Y 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 031901 Google Scholar
[89]	Chen C, Huang Y, Ji X, Xiao Y 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 164122 Google Scholar
[90]	Chen C J, Huang Y Z, Jiang X W, Xiao Y 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 141 154109 Google Scholar
[91]	Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Cao S, Liu S, Unarta I C, Huang X H 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 124105 Google Scholar
[92]	Xi K, Hu Z, Wu Q, Wei M, Qian R, Zhu L Z 2021 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17 5301 Google Scholar
[93]	Wang L, Xi K, Zhu L Z, Da L T 2022 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 3213 Google Scholar
[94]	Xi K, Zhu L Z 2022 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 14628 Google Scholar
[95]	Xi K, Zhu L Z 2023 A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules (AIP Publishing) pp9-1−9-24
[96]	Vanden-Eijnden E 2006 Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology (Berlin: Springer) pp453−493
[97]	Vanden-Eijnden E 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 391 Google Scholar
[98]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Csajka F S, Chandler D 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 1964 Google Scholar
[99]	Bolhuis P G, Dellago C, Chandler D 1998 Faraday Discuss. 110 421 Google Scholar
[100]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Chandler D 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 6617 Google Scholar
[101]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Geissler P L 2002 Adv. Chem. Phys. 123 1 Google Scholar
[102]	Noé F, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Clementi C 2020 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71 361 Google Scholar
[103]	AlQuraishi M, Sorger P K 2021 Nat. Methods 18 1169 Google Scholar
[104]	Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 422 Google Scholar
[105]	Ju F, Zhu J, Shao B, Kong L, Liu T Y, Zheng W M, Bu D 2021 Nat. Commum. 12 2535 Google Scholar
[106]	Huang B, Xu Y, Hu X H, Liu Y R, Liao S H, Zhang J H, Huang C D, Hong J J, Chen Q, Liu H Y 2022 Nature 602 523 Google Scholar
[107]	Du Z, Su H, Wang W, Ye L, Wei H, Peng Z, Anishchenko I, Baker D, Yang J 2021 Nat. Prot. 16 5634 Google Scholar
[108]	Dai M, Dong Z, Xu K, Zhang Q C 2023 J. Mol. Biol. 435 168059 Google Scholar
[109]	Yuan Q M, Chen J W, Zhao H Y, Zhou Y Q, Yang Y D 2022 Bioinformatics 38 125 Google Scholar
[110]	Su M Y, Feng G, Liu Z, Li Y, Wang R 2020 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 1122 Google Scholar
[111]	Zeng C, Jian Y, Vosoughi S, Zeng C, Zhao Y 2023 Nat. Commum. 14 1060 Google Scholar
[112]	Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, Wu H 2019 Science 365 6457 Google Scholar
[113]	Jung H, Covino R, Arjun A, Leitold C, Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Hummer G 2023 Nat. Comput. Sci. 3 334 Google Scholar
[114]	Weiss D R, Levitt M 2009 J. Mol. Biol. 385 665 Google Scholar
[115]	Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K 2001 Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 224 Google Scholar
[116]	Schlitter J, Engels M, Krüger P 1994 J. Mol. Graph. 12 84 Google Scholar
[117]	Torrie G M, Valleau J P 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 187 Google Scholar
[118]	Ryckaert J P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H J 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 327 Google Scholar
[119]	Babin V, Roland C, Sagui C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 134101 Google Scholar
[120]	Branduardi D, Gervasio F L, Parrinello M 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 054103 Google Scholar
[121]	Applegate D L, Bixby R E, Chvátal V, Cook W J 2011 The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study (Princeton University Press) pp1−58
[122]	Cox M A A, Cox T F 2008 Handbook of Data Visualization (Berlin: Springer) pp315−347
[123]	Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 020603 Google Scholar
[124]	Fischmann T O, Smith C K, Mayhood T W, Myers J E, Reichert J P, Mannarino A, Carr D, Zhu H, Wong J, Yang R S, Le H V, Madison V S 2009 Biochemistry 48 2661 Google Scholar
[125]	Hanrahan A J, Sylvester B E, Chang M T, et al. 2020 Cancer Res. 80 4233 Google Scholar
[126]	Schmidt M, Lipson H 2009 Science 324 81 Google Scholar
[127]	Jung H, Okazaki K, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 152716 Google Scholar
[128]	Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 813 Google Scholar
[129]	Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 837 Google Scholar
[130]	Glielmo A, Husic B E, Rodriguez A, Clementi C, Noé F, Laio A 2021 Chem. Rev. 121 9722 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a)依赖集合变量的过渡态搜索示意图, 需由生物分子(以丙戊酸二肽为例)体系所在的高维相空间(phase space)选取少量集合变量CV强行“定向降维”, 后在此低维CV空间利用非路径类方法或路径方法, 找到过渡态(Transition State), 并给出微观机制解释(mechanism interpretation); (b)非路径类的GAD算法原理示意图; (c), (d)两类路径类搜索算法原理示意图

Fig. 1. (a) Illustration of the flow-chart of the collective variables (CVs) based transition state searching. A low dimensional space must be constructed with the CVs, which are arbitrary a priori guess about the mechanism. The transition state(s) is then determined by either the non-path or path methods. (b) The non-path method GAD. Path methods of (c) finite temperature string and (d) fast tomographic.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 (a) PCV构建^[120]和TAPS Method^{[91–95,121]}算法原理示意图; (b)基于伞形采样方法得到的TAPS算法确定的MEK1由Loop-Out到达Loop-In转变过程最小自由能路径(MFEP)的自由能图景及相应的微观转变机制^[92]

Fig. 2. (a) Illustration for the construction of PCV and the flow-chart of the TAPS method; (b) TAPS revealed the free energy landscape and the transition states for the transition from the Loop-Out state of MEK1 to its Loop-In state^[92].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 路径采样算法的基本原理示意图　(a)路径采样中生成新相空间路径的shooting move; (b)传统过渡路径采样(左侧)的随机蒙特卡罗采样与过渡态分析原理^[98–101], 融合强化学习的路径采样(右侧)在学习过程中不断促进采样起始点选择向过渡态集中^[113]

Fig. 3. Schematics of path sampling methods. (a) Shooting move: select a phase space point on the current path, make a small perturbation to this point (redraw random initial velocities) and perform a set of simulations. (b) Path sampling is built upon the committor probability $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $. The traditional transition path sampling (left)^[98–101] selects shooting points randomly and uses Monte Carlo for sampling; the transition state is characterized through post-analysis: choosing the CVs with the highest and narrowest distribution of P(TP|CV); the new reinforcement path sampling (right)^[113] chooses shooting points adaptively and directly learns the committor probability $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $ with maximized P(TP|x). Symbolic regression of $ {p}_{{\mathrm{B}}} $ is used for mechanism interpretation.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 物理化学家需要怎样的降维算法　(a)现有降维算法范式不保留过渡态信息, 不利于机制解析; (b)可能的替代范式, 基于生成模型研发可保留过渡态信息的可逆降维算法, 并与低维空间搜索过渡态的GAD联用

Fig. 4. Requirements on dimensionality reduction algorithms by physical chemists. (a) Current paradigm for dimensionality reduction and the main difficulties for the transition state searching. (b) Proposed alternative paradigm for transition state searching: combine dimensionality reduction that preserves transition state information with GAD.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 主要过渡态搜索算法的总结分类

Table 1. Classification of the algorithms for transition state searching.

过渡态搜索算法分类		代表性算法	参考文献	备注
传统方法	依赖CV	Gentlest ascent dynamics (GAD)	[79—81]	非路径方法
	依赖CV	Finite temperature string	[82—87]	路径方法
	预设低维	Fast tomographic	[88—90]
	空间搜索	基于旅行商的路径搜索 TAPS	[91—95]
融合AI	不依赖CV 高维空间搜索	Transition path sampling	[98—101]
	不依赖CV 高维空间搜索	Reinforcement path sampling	[113]
	保留过渡态信息的降维低维空间搜索	融合生成模型及GAD 的过渡态搜索(待研发)	无	非路径方法

下载: 导出CSV

map

[1]	Edman L, Földes-Papp Z, Wennmalm S, Rigler R 1999 Chem. Phys. 247 11 Google Scholar
[2]	Evenäs J, Malmendal A, Thulin E, Carlstrӧm G, Forsén S 1998 Biochemistry 37 13744 Google Scholar
[3]	Hanson J A, Duderstadt K, Watkins L P, Bhattacharyya S, Brokaw J B, Chu J W, Yang H 2007 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 18055 Google Scholar
[4]	Moffat K 1989 Annu. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 18 309 Google Scholar
[5]	Huang C, Kalodimos C G 2017 Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46 317 Google Scholar
[6]	Weissenberger G, Henderikx R J M, Peters P J 2021 Nat. Methods 18 463 Google Scholar
[7]	Clegg R M 1995 Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 6 103 Google Scholar
[8]	Karplus M, McCammon J A 2002 Nat. Struct. Biol. 9 646 Google Scholar
[9]	Hollingsworth S A, Dror R O 2018 Neuron 99 1129 Google Scholar
[10]	Bernèche S, Roux B 2001 Nature 414 73 Google Scholar
[11]	Khafizov K, Perez C, Koshy C, Quick M, Fendler K, Ziegler C, Forrest L R 2012 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 E3035 Google Scholar
[12]	Li J, Shaikh S A, Enkavi G, Wen P C, Huang Z, Tajkhorshid E 2013 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110 7696 Google Scholar
[13]	Dror, R O, Green H F, Valant C, Borhani D W, Valcourt J R, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Canals M, Lane J R, Rahmani R, Baell J B, Sexton P M, Christopoulos A, Shaw D E 2013 Nature 503 295 Google Scholar
[14]	Wacker D, Stevens R C, Roth B L 2017 a Cell 170 414 Google Scholar
[15]	Wacker D, Wang S, McCorvy J D, Betz R M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Levit A, Lansu K, Schools Z L, Che T, Nichols D E, Dror R O, Roth B L 2017 Cell 168 377 Google Scholar
[16]	McCorvy J D, Butler K V, Kelly B, Rechsteiner K, Karpiak J, Betz R M, Kormos B L, Shoichet B K, Dror R O, Jin J, Roth B L 2018 Nat. Chem. Biol. 14 126 Google Scholar
[17]	Provasi D, Artacho M C, Negri A, Mobarec J C, Filizola M 2011 PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 e1002193 Google Scholar
[18]	Cordero-Morales J F, Jogini V, Lewis A, Vásquez V, Cortes D M, Roux B, Perozo E 2007 Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14 1062 Google Scholar
[19]	Fields J B, Németh-Cahalan K L, Freites J A, Vorontsova I, Hall J E, Tobias D J 2017 J. Biol. Chem. 292 185 Google Scholar
[20]	Groban E S, Narayanan A, Jacobson M P 2006 PLoS Comput. Biol. 2 e32 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu Y, Ke M, Gong H 2015 Biophys. J. 109 542 Google Scholar
[22]	Delemotte L, Tarek M, Klein M L, Amaral C, Treptow W 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 6109 Google Scholar
[23]	Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror R O, Shaw D E 2011 Science 334 517 Google Scholar
[24]	Snow C D, Nguyen H, Pande V S, Gruebele M 2002 Nature 420 102 Google Scholar
[25]	Dror R O, Arlow D H, Maragakis P, Mildorf T J, Pan A C, Xu H, Borhani D W, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 18684 Google Scholar
[26]	Dror R O, Pan A C, Arlow D H, Borhani D W, Maragakis P, Shan Y, Xu H, Shaw D E 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 13118 Google Scholar
[27]	Gu Y, Shrivastava I H, Amara S G, Bahar I 2009 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2589 Google Scholar
[28]	Latorraca N R, Fastman N M, Venkatakrishnan A J, Frommer W B, Dror R O, Feng L 2017 Cell 169 96 Google Scholar
[29]	Stelzl L S, Fowler P W, Sansom M S, Beckstein O 2014 J. Mol. Biol. 426 735 Google Scholar
[30]	Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G 2011 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 10184 Google Scholar
[31]	Liang R, Swanson J M J, Madsen J J, Hong M, DeGrado W F, Voth G A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113 E6955 Google Scholar
[32]	Suomivuori C M, Gamiz-Hernandez A P, Sundholm D, Kaila V R I 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114 7043 Google Scholar
[33]	Tajkhorshid E, Nollert P, Jensen M Ø, Miercke L J W, O’Connell J, Stroud R M, Schulten K 2002 Science 296 525 Google Scholar
[34]	Watanabe A, Choe S, Chaptal V, Rosenberg J M, Wright E M, Grabe M, Abramson J 2010 Nature 468 988 Google Scholar
[35]	Dedmon M M, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson C M 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 476 Google Scholar
[36]	Nguyen H D, Hall C K 2004 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 16180 Google Scholar
[37]	Levitt M 1983 J. Mol. Biol. 168 595 Google Scholar
[38]	Sugita Y, Okamoto Y 1999 Chem. Phys. Lett. 314 141 Google Scholar
[39]	Rhee Y M, Pande V S 2003 Biophys. J. 84 775 Google Scholar
[40]	Zhang W, Wu C, Duan Y 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 154105 Google Scholar
[41]	Zhou R 2006 Protein Folding Protocols (Humana Totowa, NJ: Springer) pp205−223
[42]	Sindhikara D, Meng Y, Roitberg A E 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 024103 Google Scholar
[43]	Buchete N V, Hummer G 2008 Phys. Rev. E 77 030902 Google Scholar
[44]	Rosta E, Hummer G 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 165102 Google Scholar
[45]	Stelzl L S, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13 3927 Google Scholar
[46]	Yang L J, Gao Q Y 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 214109 Google Scholar
[47]	Yang L, Liu C W, Shao Q, Zhang J, Gao Y Q 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 947 Google Scholar
[48]	Yang Y I, Zhang J, Che X, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 144 094105 Google Scholar
[49]	Yang Y I, Shao Q, Zhang J, Yang L J, Gao Y Q 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 151 070902 Google Scholar
[50]	Huber T, Torda A E, Van Gunsteren W F 1994 J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 8 695 Google Scholar
[51]	Wada T, Kuroda K, Yoshida Y, Ogasawara K, Ogawa A, Endo S 2006 Neurosurg. Rev. 29 242 Google Scholar
[52]	Hansen H S, Hünenberger P H 2010 J. Comput. Chem. 31 1 Google Scholar
[53]	Perić-Hassler L, Hansen H S, Baron R, Hünenberger P H 2010 Carbohydr. Res. 345 1781 Google Scholar
[54]	Grubmüller H 1995 Phys. Rev. E 52 2893 Google Scholar
[55]	Schulze B G, Grubmüller H, Evanseck J D 2000 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 8700 Google Scholar
[56]	Bouvier B, Grubmüller H 2007 Biophys. J. 93 770 Google Scholar
[57]	Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M 2011 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1 826 Google Scholar
[58]	Tiwary P, Parrinello M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 230602 Google Scholar
[59]	Bussi G, Laio A 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 200 Google Scholar
[60]	Miao Y, Feher V A, McCammon J A 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 3584 Google Scholar
[61]	Miao Y, McCammon J A 2017 Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem. 13 231 Google Scholar
[62]	Wang J, Arantes P R, Bhattarai A, et al. 2021 Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 11 e1521 Google Scholar
[63]	Naritomi Y, Sotaro F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 065101 Google Scholar
[64]	Schwantes C R, Vijay S P 2013 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9 2000 Google Scholar
[65]	Perez-Hernandez G, Paul F, Giorgino T, Fabritiis G D, Noé F 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 139 015102 Google Scholar
[66]	Bowman G R, Huang X H, Pande V S 2009 Methods 49 197 Google Scholar
[67]	Metzner P, Noé F, Schütte C 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 021106 Google Scholar
[68]	Pande V S, Beauchamp K A, Bowman G R 2010 Methods 52 99 Google Scholar
[69]	Prinz J H, Wu H, Sarich M, Keller B, Senne M, Held M, Chodera J D, Schütte C, Noé F 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 174105 Google Scholar
[70]	Kellogg E H, Lange O F, Baker D 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 11405 Google Scholar
[71]	Yao Y, Cui R Z, Bowman G R, Silva D A, Sun J, Huang X H 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 174106 Google Scholar
[72]	McGibbon R T, Schwantes C R, Pande V S 2014 J. Phys. Chem. B 118 6475 Google Scholar
[73]	Nuske F, Keller B G, Pérez-Hernández G, Mey A S J, Noé F 2014 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10 1739 Google Scholar
[74]	Sheong F K, Silva D A, Meng L, Zhao Y, Huang X H 2015 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11 17 Google Scholar
[75]	Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Zeng X, Huang X H 2016 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 30228 Google Scholar
[76]	Wang W, Cao S, Zhu L Z, Huang X H 2018 WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8 e1343 Google Scholar
[77]	Husic B E, Pande V S 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 2386 Google Scholar
[78]	Konovalov K A, Unarta I C, Cao S, Goonetilleke E C, Huang X H 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. Au. 1 1330 Google Scholar
[79]	E W, Zhou X 2011 Nonlinearity 24 1831 Google Scholar
[80]	Samanta A, Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 140 164109 Google Scholar
[81]	Chen M, Yu T Q, Tuckerman M E 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3235 Google Scholar
[82]	E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 052301 Google Scholar
[83]	E W, Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2005 J. Phys. Chem. B 109 6688 Google Scholar
[84]	Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G 2006 J. Chem. Phys. 125 024106 Google Scholar
[85]	Ren W, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 164103 Google Scholar
[86]	Maragliano L, Vanden-Eijnden E 2007 Chem. Phys. Lett. 446 182 Google Scholar
[87]	Pan A C, Sezer D, Roux B 2008 J. Phys. Chem. B 112 3432 Google Scholar
[88]	Chen C, Huang Y, Xiao Y 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 031901 Google Scholar
[89]	Chen C, Huang Y, Ji X, Xiao Y 2013 J. Chem. Phys. 138 164122 Google Scholar
[90]	Chen C J, Huang Y Z, Jiang X W, Xiao Y 2014 J. Chem. Phys. 141 154109 Google Scholar
[91]	Zhu L Z, Sheong F K, Cao S, Liu S, Unarta I C, Huang X H 2019 J. Chem. Phys. 150 124105 Google Scholar
[92]	Xi K, Hu Z, Wu Q, Wei M, Qian R, Zhu L Z 2021 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17 5301 Google Scholar
[93]	Wang L, Xi K, Zhu L Z, Da L T 2022 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62 3213 Google Scholar
[94]	Xi K, Zhu L Z 2022 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 14628 Google Scholar
[95]	Xi K, Zhu L Z 2023 A Practical Guide to Recent Advances in Multiscale Modeling and Simulation of Biomolecules (AIP Publishing) pp9-1−9-24
[96]	Vanden-Eijnden E 2006 Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology (Berlin: Springer) pp453−493
[97]	Vanden-Eijnden E 2010 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 391 Google Scholar
[98]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Csajka F S, Chandler D 1998 J. Chem. Phys. 108 1964 Google Scholar
[99]	Bolhuis P G, Dellago C, Chandler D 1998 Faraday Discuss. 110 421 Google Scholar
[100]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Chandler D 1999 J. Chem. Phys. 110 6617 Google Scholar
[101]	Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Geissler P L 2002 Adv. Chem. Phys. 123 1 Google Scholar
[102]	Noé F, Tkatchenko A, Müller K R, Clementi C 2020 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71 361 Google Scholar
[103]	AlQuraishi M, Sorger P K 2021 Nat. Methods 18 1169 Google Scholar
[104]	Karniadakis G E, Kevrekidis I G, Lu L, Perdikaris P, Wang S, Yang L 2021 Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 422 Google Scholar
[105]	Ju F, Zhu J, Shao B, Kong L, Liu T Y, Zheng W M, Bu D 2021 Nat. Commum. 12 2535 Google Scholar
[106]	Huang B, Xu Y, Hu X H, Liu Y R, Liao S H, Zhang J H, Huang C D, Hong J J, Chen Q, Liu H Y 2022 Nature 602 523 Google Scholar
[107]	Du Z, Su H, Wang W, Ye L, Wei H, Peng Z, Anishchenko I, Baker D, Yang J 2021 Nat. Prot. 16 5634 Google Scholar
[108]	Dai M, Dong Z, Xu K, Zhang Q C 2023 J. Mol. Biol. 435 168059 Google Scholar
[109]	Yuan Q M, Chen J W, Zhao H Y, Zhou Y Q, Yang Y D 2022 Bioinformatics 38 125 Google Scholar
[110]	Su M Y, Feng G, Liu Z, Li Y, Wang R 2020 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60 1122 Google Scholar
[111]	Zeng C, Jian Y, Vosoughi S, Zeng C, Zhao Y 2023 Nat. Commum. 14 1060 Google Scholar
[112]	Noé F, Olsson S, Köhler J, Wu H 2019 Science 365 6457 Google Scholar
[113]	Jung H, Covino R, Arjun A, Leitold C, Dellago C, Bolhuis P G, Hummer G 2023 Nat. Comput. Sci. 3 334 Google Scholar
[114]	Weiss D R, Levitt M 2009 J. Mol. Biol. 385 665 Google Scholar
[115]	Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K 2001 Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11 224 Google Scholar
[116]	Schlitter J, Engels M, Krüger P 1994 J. Mol. Graph. 12 84 Google Scholar
[117]	Torrie G M, Valleau J P 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 187 Google Scholar
[118]	Ryckaert J P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen H J 1977 J. Comput. Phys. 23 327 Google Scholar
[119]	Babin V, Roland C, Sagui C 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 134101 Google Scholar
[120]	Branduardi D, Gervasio F L, Parrinello M 2007 J. Chem. Phys. 126 054103 Google Scholar
[121]	Applegate D L, Bixby R E, Chvátal V, Cook W J 2011 The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Computational Study (Princeton University Press) pp1−58
[122]	Cox M A A, Cox T F 2008 Handbook of Data Visualization (Berlin: Springer) pp315−347
[123]	Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 020603 Google Scholar
[124]	Fischmann T O, Smith C K, Mayhood T W, Myers J E, Reichert J P, Mannarino A, Carr D, Zhu H, Wong J, Yang R S, Le H V, Madison V S 2009 Biochemistry 48 2661 Google Scholar
[125]	Hanrahan A J, Sylvester B E, Chang M T, et al. 2020 Cancer Res. 80 4233 Google Scholar
[126]	Schmidt M, Lipson H 2009 Science 324 81 Google Scholar
[127]	Jung H, Okazaki K, Hummer G 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 152716 Google Scholar
[128]	Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 813 Google Scholar
[129]	Swenson D W H, Prinz J H, Noe F, Chodera J D, Bolhuis P G 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 837 Google Scholar
[130]	Glielmo A, Husic B E, Rodriguez A, Clementi C, Noé F, Laio A 2021 Chem. Rev. 121 9722 Google Scholar

[1]	王鹏, 麦麦提尼亚孜·麦麦提阿卜杜拉. 机器学习的量子动力学. , 2025, 74(6): . doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20240999
[2]	陈晶晶, 赵洪坡, 王葵, 占慧敏, 罗泽宇. SiC基底覆多层石墨烯力学强化性能分子动力学模拟. , 2024, 73(10): 109601. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20232031
[3]	刘希望, 张宏丹, 贲帅, 杨士栋, 任鑫, 宋晓红, 杨玮枫. 费曼路径积分强场动力学计算方法. , 2023, 72(19): 198701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230451
[4]	张逸凡, 任卫, 王伟丽, 丁书剑, 李楠, 常亮, 周倩. 机器学习结合固溶强化模型预测高熵合金硬度. , 2023, 72(18): 180701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230646
[5]	华颖鑫, 刘福生, 耿华运, 郝龙, 于继东, 谭叶, 李俊. 多次冲击加载-卸载路径下铁α-ε相变动力学特性研究. , 2021, 70(16): 166201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210089
[6]	孙太平, 吴玉椿, 郭国平. 量子生成模型. , 2021, 70(14): 140304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210930
[7]	张冬晓, 陈志斌, 肖程, 秦梦泽, 吴浩. 基于引力搜索算法的湍流相位屏生成方法. , 2019, 68(13): 134205. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190081
[8]	梅英, 谭冠政, 刘振焘, 武鹤. 基于大脑情感学习模型和自适应遗传算法的混沌时间序列预测. , 2018, 67(8): 080502. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172104
[9]	李晓克, 冯伟. 非绝热分子动力学的量子路径模拟. , 2017, 66(15): 153101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.153101
[10]	陈基, 冯页新, 李新征, 王恩哥. 基于路径积分分子动力学与热力学积分方法的高压氢自由能计算. , 2015, 64(18): 183101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.183101
[11]	高文, 汤洋, 朱明. 目标跟踪中目标模型更新问题的半监督学习算法研究. , 2015, 64(1): 014205. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.014205
[12]	廖宏宇, 马晓燠, 郭友明, 饶长辉, 魏凯. 基于AR模型搜索迭代算法的望远镜跟踪误差分析. , 2014, 63(17): 179501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.179501
[13]	阮鹏, 谢冀江, 潘其坤, 张来明, 郭劲. 非链式脉冲DF化学激光器反应动力学模型. , 2013, 62(9): 094208. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094208
[14]	陈基根, 曾思良, 杨玉军, 程超. 三色激光控制量子路径生成短于30阿秒的孤立脉冲. , 2012, 61(12): 123201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.123201
[15]	张水舰, 刘学军, 杨洋. 动态随机最短路径算法研究. , 2012, 61(16): 160201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.160201
[16]	颜克凤, 李小森, 孙丽华, 陈朝阳, 夏志明. 储氢笼型水合物生成促进机理的分子动力学模拟研究. , 2011, 60(12): 128801. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.128801
[17]	戴显英, 金国强, 董洁琼, 王船宝, 赵娴, 楚亚萍, 奚鹏程, 邓文洪, 张鹤鸣, 郝跃. 锗硅/硅异质结材料的化学气相淀积生长动力学模型. , 2011, 60(6): 065101. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.065101
[18]	陈军, 李春光. 禁忌学习神经元模型的电路设计及其动力学研究. , 2011, 60(2): 020502. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.020502
[19]	陈基根, 陈高, 池方萍, 杨玉军. 量子路径控制生成宽频软X射线连续辐射谱. , 2010, 59(5): 3162-3167. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3162
[20]	程成, 庄飞. 优化铜蒸气激光的动力学强化机理研究. , 2001, 50(3): 478-482. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.478

计量

文章访问数: 4457
PDF下载量: 216
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板