静水压力调谐Ag纳米颗粒散射场下量子点激子寿命

黄君辉; 李元和; 王健; 李叔伦; 倪海桥; 牛智川; 窦秀明; 孙宝权

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20221344

摘要

将InAs/GaAs量子点薄膜样品转移到Ag纳米颗粒覆盖的Si衬底上, 然后将样品放到金刚石对顶砧压力腔室内. 在$ 1.09—1.98\;\rm{G}\rm{P}\rm{a} $ 的压力范围内, 测量了量子点激子的荧光光谱和时间分辨光谱. 实验结果显示, 随着静水压力的增大, 激子的发光波长蓝移, 激子的发光寿命从$ \left(41\pm 3\right)\times 10\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $延长到 $ \left(120\pm 4\right)\times 10\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $, 再减短到$ (7.6\pm 0.2)\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $, 在激子发光波长为 $ 797.49\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $ 时, 寿命达到最长的$ \left(120\pm 4\right)\times 10\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $. 相比没有Ag纳米颗粒影响的InAs/GaAs量子点中的激子寿命约$ 1\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $, 激子的寿命延长了约1200倍. 其物理机制为量子点浸润层中激子的辐射场和Ag 纳米颗粒的散射场之间发生相消干涉, 抑制了浸润层中激子的自发辐射, 这些长寿命的浸润层激子将扩散到量子点中, 并辐射复合发光, 从而观察到量子点激子的长寿命衰变曲线. 这一实验结果与基于在散射场下的偶极子辐射模型计算结果一致.

关键词:

Abstract

In the past few decades, the studies of exciton emissions coupled with the metal nanoparticles have mainly focused on the enhancing exciton radiation and reducing exciton lifetime by near-field coupling interactions between excitons and metal nanoparticles. Only in recent years has the plasmon-field-induced to extend exciton lifetime (inhibition of the exciton emission) been reported. Experimentally, for observing a long-lifetime exciton state it needs to satisfy a condition of $kz\sim1$, instead of near-field condition of $ kz\ll 1 $, where $k=2{\pi }n/\lambda$ is the wavevector, $ n $ is the refractive index, $ \lambda $ is the wavelength, and $ z $ is the separation distance between the emitter and metal nanoparticle. Thus, in this paper, we tune the exciton emission wavelength by applying hydrostatic pressure to achieve the condition of $kz\sim1$ in order to in detail investigate the coupling between excitons and metal nanoparticles. The studied InAs/GaAs quantum dot (QD) sample is grown by molecular beam epitaxy on a (001) semi-insulating GaAs substrate. After the AlAs sacrificial layer is etched with hydrofluoric acid, the QD film sample is transferred onto an Si substrate covered with Ag nanoparticles. Then the sample is placed in the diamond anvil cell device combined with a piezoelectric ceramic. In this case we can measure the photoluminescence and time-resolved photoluminescence spectra of the QD sample under different pressures. It is found that the observed longest exciton lifetime is $(120\pm 4)\times 10~\rm{n}\rm{s}$ at a pressure of $ 1.38\;\rm{G}\rm{P}\rm{a} $, corresponding the exciton emission wavelength of $ 797.49\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $, which is about $ 1200 $ times longer than the exciton lifetime of $\sim 1\;\rm{n}\rm{s} $ in QDs without the influence of Ag nanoparticles. The experimental results can be understood based on the destructive interference between the quantum dot exciton radiation field and the scattering field of metal nanoparticles. This model proposes a convenient way to increase the emission lifetime of dipoles on a large scale, and is expected to be applied to quantum information processing, optoelectronic applications, fundamental physics researches such as Bose-Einstein condensates.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
中国科学院半导体研究所, 超晶格国家重点实验室, 北京　100083

2.
中国科学院大学材料科学与光电技术学院, 北京　100049

通信作者: 窦秀明, xmdou@semi.ac.cn ; 孙宝权, bqsun@semi.ac.cn

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 61827823, 11974342)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
State Key Laboratory of Superlattices and Microstructures, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China

2.
College of Materials Science and Optoelectronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: Dou Xiu-Ming, xmdou@semi.ac.cn ; Sun Bao-Quan, bqsun@semi.ac.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61827823, 11974342) .

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Drexhage K H 1970 J. Lumin. 1–2 693
[2]	Ferioli G, Glicenstein A, Henriet L, Ferrier-Barbut I, Browaeys A 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021031
[3]	Cipris A, Moreira N A, do Espirito Santo T S, Weiss P, Villas-Boas C J, Kaiser R, Guerin W, Bachelard R 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 103604 Google Scholar
[4]	Pineiro Orioli A, Rey A M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223601 Google Scholar
[5]	Heyde K, Sau J 1986 Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys. 33 1050 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhou Y, Scuri G, Sung J, Gelly R J, Wild D S, De Greve K, Joe A Y, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Kim P, Lukin M D, Park H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 027401 Google Scholar
[7]	Ropp C, Cummins Z, Nah S, Fourkas J T, Shapiro B, Waks E 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 6558 Google Scholar
[8]	Bužek V 1990 Z. Phys. D At. Mol. Clust. 17 91 Google Scholar
[9]	Gu Y, Wang L, Ren P, Zhang J, Zhang T, Martin O J, Gong Q 2012 Nano Lett. 12 2488 Google Scholar
[10]	Anger P, Bharadwaj P, Novotny L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 113002 Google Scholar
[11]	Delga A, Feist J, Bravo-Abad J, Garcia-Vidal F J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 253601 Google Scholar
[12]	Gazzano O, Michaelis de Vasconcellos S, Gauthron K, Symonds C, Bloch J, Voisin P, Bellessa J, Lemaitre A, Senellart P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 247402 Google Scholar
[13]	Evangelou S, Yannopapas V, Paspalakis E 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 023819 Google Scholar
[14]	Felici M, Pettinari G, Biccari F, Boschetti A, Younis S, Birindelli S, Gurioli M, Vinattieri A, Gerardino A, Businaro L, Hopkinson M, Rubini S, Capizzi M, Polimeni A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 205403 Google Scholar
[15]	闫晓宏, 牛亦杰, 徐红星, 魏红 2022 71 067301 Google Scholar Yan X H, Niu Y J, Xu H X, Wei H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 067301 Google Scholar
[16]	Kuhn S, Hakanson U, Rogobete L, Sandoghdar V 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 017402 Google Scholar
[17]	Pustovit V N, Shahbazyan T V 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 077401 Google Scholar
[18]	Huang J, Ojambati O S, Chikkaraddy R, Sokolowski K, Wan Q, Durkan C, Scherman O A, Baumberg J J 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 047402 Google Scholar
[19]	Belacel C, Habert B, Bigourdan F, Marquier F, Hugonin J P, de Vasconcellos S M, Lafosse X, Coolen L, Schwob C, Javaux C, Dubertret B, Greffet J J, Senellart P, Maitre A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 1516 Google Scholar
[20]	Dey S, Zhou Y, Tian X, Jenkins J A, Chen O, Zou S, Zhao J 2015 Nanoscale 7 6851 Google Scholar
[21]	张炼, 王化雨, 王宁, 陶灿, 翟学琳, 马平准, 钟莹, 刘海涛 2022 71 118101 Google Scholar Zhang L, Wang H Y, Wang N, Tao C, Zhai X L, Ma P Z, Zhong Y, Liu H T 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 118101 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen H, Huang J, He X, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2020 ACS Photon. 7 3228 Google Scholar
[23]	Huang J, Chen H, Zhuo Z, Wang J, Li S, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 097805 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhuo Z, Chen H, Huang J, Li S, Wang J, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 3485 Google Scholar
[25]	Carreño F, Antón M A, Arrieta-Yáñez F 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 195303 Google Scholar
[26]	Feldman M A, Dumitrescu E F, Bridges D, Chisholm M F, Davidson R B, Evans P G, Hachtel J A, Hu A, Pooser R C, Haglund R F, Lawrie B J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 081404 Google Scholar
[27]	Carreño F, Yannopapas V, Antón M A, Paspalakis E 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023802 Google Scholar
[28]	Hofmann M S, Gluckert J T, Noe J, Bourjau C, Dehmel R, Hogele A 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 502 Google Scholar
[29]	Johansen J, Julsgaard B, Stobbe S, Hvam J M, Lodahl P 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 081304 Google Scholar
[30]	Palummo M, Bernardi M, Grossman J C 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2794 Google Scholar
[31]	Butov L V, Lai C W, Ivanov A L, Gossard A C, Chemla D S 2002 Nature 417 47 Google Scholar
[32]	Novotny L, Hecht B 2012 Priciples of Nano-Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp335–359
[33]	Wu X F, Wei H, Dou X M, Ding K, Yu Y, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Ji Y, Li S S, Jiang D S, Guo G C, He L X, Sun B Q 2014 Europhys. Lett. 107 27008 Google Scholar
[34]	李元和, 卓志瑶, 王健, 黄君辉, 李叔伦, 倪海桥, 牛智川, 窦秀明, 孙宝权 2022 71 067804 Google Scholar Li Y H, Zhuo Z Y, Wang J, Huang J H, Li S L, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Dou X M, Sun B Q 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 067804 Google Scholar
[35]	Yu Y, Shang X J, Li M F, Zha G W, Xu J X, Wang L J, Wang G W, Ni H Q, Dou X, Sun B, Niu Z C 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 201103 Google Scholar
[36]	尚向军, 马奔, 陈泽升, 喻颖, 查国伟, 倪海桥, 牛智川 2018 67 227801 Google Scholar Shang X J, Ma B, Chen Z S, Yu Y, Zha G W, Ni H Q, Niu Z C 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 227801 Google Scholar
[37]	Wu X, Dou X, Ding K, Zhou P, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Sun B 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 252108 Google Scholar
[38]	丁琨, 武雪飞, 窦秀明, 孙宝权 2016 65 037701 Google Scholar Ding K, Wu X F, Dou X M, Sun B Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 037701 Google Scholar
[39]	徐章程, 贾国治, 孙亮, 姚江宏, 许京军, Hvam J M, 王占国 2005 54 5367 Google Scholar Xu Z C, Jia G Z, Sun L, Yao J H, Xu J J, Hvam J M, Wang Z G 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5367 Google Scholar
[40]	Itskevich I E, Lyapin S G, Troyan I A, Klipstein P C, Eaves L, Main P C, Henini M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R4250 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang G, Fafard S, Leonard D, Bowers J E, Merz J L, Petroff P M 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 2815 Google Scholar
[42]	Seufert J, Bacher G, Schömig H, Forchel A, Hansen L, Schmidt G, Molenkamp L W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 035311 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhou P Y, Dou X M, Wu X F, Ding K, Luo S, Yang T, Zhu H J, Jiang D S, Sun B Q 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 023510 Google Scholar
[44]	Eisaman M D, Fan J, Migdall A, Polyakov S V 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 071101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weber W H, Ford G W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 125429 Google Scholar
[46]	Johnson P B, Christy R W 1972 Phys. Rev. B 6 4370 Google Scholar
[47]	Adachi S 2012 Handbook on Optical Constants of Metals (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing ) pp61–68
[48]	Adachi S 2012 The Handbook on Optical Constants of Semiconductors (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing) pp153–162
[49]	Saglimbeni F, Bianchi S, Gibson G, Bowman R, Padgett M, Di Leonardo R 2016 Opt. Express 24 27009 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 (a) InAs/GaAs 量子点样品转移到覆盖了Ag纳米颗粒的Si片上示意图, 其中黄色箭头表示量子点浸润层中激子偶极子与金属纳米颗粒偶极子之间的相互作用; (b)金刚石对顶砧设备示意图, 其中金属垫片和金刚石砧面组成样品的压力腔室, 腔室中放置样品和红宝石

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the InAs/GaAs QD sample transferred onto a Si substrate covered with Ag nanoparticles. The yellow arrow represents the interaction between exciton dipole in WL and the Ag nanoparticles. (b) Schematic diagram of the diamond anvil cell. The pressure chamber consists of a metal gasket and diamond surfaces. The sample and ruby are placed in the chamber.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 (a)低温20 K和常压下量子点样品的PL光谱, 激发功率为2.2 μW; 插图为$ 893.78\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $波长的量子点发光谱线的TRPL光谱, 激光为$ 40\;\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $的脉冲光, 激发功率为1.04 μW, 红色实线为使用单指数衰减函数拟合的结果; (b)在低温 20 K和$ 1.09\;\rm{G}\rm{P}\rm{a} $压力下, 转移后量子点样品的PL光谱, 激发功率为2.2 μW; 插图为$ 825.22\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $波长的发光谱线的TRPL光谱, 激发模式为$ 1\;\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $ 频率的脉冲光, 激发功率为0.026 μW, 红色实线为类拓展指数衰减函数拟合结果

Fig. 2. (a) PL spectrum of QD sample at 20 K and atmospheric pressure, excited by a power of 2.2 μW. Inset: TRPL spectrum of QD emission line of $ 893.78\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $ at an excitation power of 1.04 μW in pulsed mode of $ 40\;\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $. The red solid line represents the single exponential function fitting result. (b) PL spectrum of the transferred QD sample at 20 K and $ 1.09\;\rm{G}\rm{P}\rm{a} $, excited by a power of 2.2 μW. Inset: TRPL spectrum of QD emission line of $ 825.22\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $ at an excitation power of 0.026 μW in pulsed mode of $ 1\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $. The red solid line represents the stretched-like exponential function fitting result.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 (a) DAC腔中的压力与PZT电压的函数关系; (b)不同压力下InAs/GaAs量子点样品的PL光谱, 激发功率为2.2 μW, 红色和蓝色虚线箭头分别表示量子点和浸润层发光峰波长蓝移结果; (c)量子点(红色)和浸润层(蓝色)发光峰波长与压力的函数关系

Fig. 3. (a) Hydrostatic pressure in DAC chamber as a function of applied voltage of PZT; (b) PL spectra of the InAs/GaAs QD sample measured under different pressures at an excitation power of 2.2 μW, the red and blue dashed lines indicate the pressure-induced blue shift of QD and WL emission peaks, respectively; (c) pressure dependences of QD (red) and WL (blue) PL peak wavelengths.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 (a) InAs/GaAs量子点样品中量子点辐射速率与浸润层发光波长的依赖关系, 其中红色点为不同压力下的实验数据, 蓝色实线为(1)式计算结果; (b)—(d)在图(a)中蓝色圆圈A, B和C三个浸润层发光波长 ($ 808.50\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $, $ 797.49\;\rm{ }\rm{n}\rm{m} $和$ 769.84\;\rm{ }\rm{n}\rm{m} $) 位置对应的量子点PL 和TRPL光谱(插图), 对应激发光的脉冲频率分别为$ 1\;\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $, $ 0.25\;\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $和$ 10\;\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $, 其中插图内红色实线表示类拓展指数函数拟合结果

Fig. 4. (a) Dependence of QD radiation rate and WL emission wavelength for the transferred InAs/GaAs QD sample, the red dots are experimental data under different hydrostatic pressures and the blue solid line represents the calculated result based on Eq. (1); (b)–(d) PL and TRPL spectra (Inset) of QD for the experimental condition of WL wavelengths at $ 808.50 $, $ 797.49 $and $ 769.84\;\rm{n}\rm{m} $, respectively, corresponding to the data points A, B and C in Fig. 4(a), with a laser excitation repetition rate of $ 1\;\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $, $ 0.25\;\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $, and $ 10\;\rm{ }\rm{M}\rm{H}\rm{z} $ respectively. The red solid lines in inset represent the stretched-like exponential function fitting results.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

map

[1]	Drexhage K H 1970 J. Lumin. 1–2 693
[2]	Ferioli G, Glicenstein A, Henriet L, Ferrier-Barbut I, Browaeys A 2021 Phys. Rev. X 11 021031
[3]	Cipris A, Moreira N A, do Espirito Santo T S, Weiss P, Villas-Boas C J, Kaiser R, Guerin W, Bachelard R 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 103604 Google Scholar
[4]	Pineiro Orioli A, Rey A M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 223601 Google Scholar
[5]	Heyde K, Sau J 1986 Phys. Rev. C Nucl. Phys. 33 1050 Google Scholar
[6]	Zhou Y, Scuri G, Sung J, Gelly R J, Wild D S, De Greve K, Joe A Y, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Kim P, Lukin M D, Park H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 027401 Google Scholar
[7]	Ropp C, Cummins Z, Nah S, Fourkas J T, Shapiro B, Waks E 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 6558 Google Scholar
[8]	Bužek V 1990 Z. Phys. D At. Mol. Clust. 17 91 Google Scholar
[9]	Gu Y, Wang L, Ren P, Zhang J, Zhang T, Martin O J, Gong Q 2012 Nano Lett. 12 2488 Google Scholar
[10]	Anger P, Bharadwaj P, Novotny L 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 113002 Google Scholar
[11]	Delga A, Feist J, Bravo-Abad J, Garcia-Vidal F J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 253601 Google Scholar
[12]	Gazzano O, Michaelis de Vasconcellos S, Gauthron K, Symonds C, Bloch J, Voisin P, Bellessa J, Lemaitre A, Senellart P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 247402 Google Scholar
[13]	Evangelou S, Yannopapas V, Paspalakis E 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 023819 Google Scholar
[14]	Felici M, Pettinari G, Biccari F, Boschetti A, Younis S, Birindelli S, Gurioli M, Vinattieri A, Gerardino A, Businaro L, Hopkinson M, Rubini S, Capizzi M, Polimeni A 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 205403 Google Scholar
[15]	闫晓宏, 牛亦杰, 徐红星, 魏红 2022 71 067301 Google Scholar Yan X H, Niu Y J, Xu H X, Wei H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 067301 Google Scholar
[16]	Kuhn S, Hakanson U, Rogobete L, Sandoghdar V 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 017402 Google Scholar
[17]	Pustovit V N, Shahbazyan T V 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 077401 Google Scholar
[18]	Huang J, Ojambati O S, Chikkaraddy R, Sokolowski K, Wan Q, Durkan C, Scherman O A, Baumberg J J 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 047402 Google Scholar
[19]	Belacel C, Habert B, Bigourdan F, Marquier F, Hugonin J P, de Vasconcellos S M, Lafosse X, Coolen L, Schwob C, Javaux C, Dubertret B, Greffet J J, Senellart P, Maitre A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 1516 Google Scholar
[20]	Dey S, Zhou Y, Tian X, Jenkins J A, Chen O, Zou S, Zhao J 2015 Nanoscale 7 6851 Google Scholar
[21]	张炼, 王化雨, 王宁, 陶灿, 翟学琳, 马平准, 钟莹, 刘海涛 2022 71 118101 Google Scholar Zhang L, Wang H Y, Wang N, Tao C, Zhai X L, Ma P Z, Zhong Y, Liu H T 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 118101 Google Scholar
[22]	Chen H, Huang J, He X, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2020 ACS Photon. 7 3228 Google Scholar
[23]	Huang J, Chen H, Zhuo Z, Wang J, Li S, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2021 Chin. Phys. B 30 097805 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhuo Z, Chen H, Huang J, Li S, Wang J, Ding K, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Dou X, Sun B 2021 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 3485 Google Scholar
[25]	Carreño F, Antón M A, Arrieta-Yáñez F 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 195303 Google Scholar
[26]	Feldman M A, Dumitrescu E F, Bridges D, Chisholm M F, Davidson R B, Evans P G, Hachtel J A, Hu A, Pooser R C, Haglund R F, Lawrie B J 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 081404 Google Scholar
[27]	Carreño F, Yannopapas V, Antón M A, Paspalakis E 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023802 Google Scholar
[28]	Hofmann M S, Gluckert J T, Noe J, Bourjau C, Dehmel R, Hogele A 2013 Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 502 Google Scholar
[29]	Johansen J, Julsgaard B, Stobbe S, Hvam J M, Lodahl P 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 081304 Google Scholar
[30]	Palummo M, Bernardi M, Grossman J C 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2794 Google Scholar
[31]	Butov L V, Lai C W, Ivanov A L, Gossard A C, Chemla D S 2002 Nature 417 47 Google Scholar
[32]	Novotny L, Hecht B 2012 Priciples of Nano-Optics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp335–359
[33]	Wu X F, Wei H, Dou X M, Ding K, Yu Y, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Ji Y, Li S S, Jiang D S, Guo G C, He L X, Sun B Q 2014 Europhys. Lett. 107 27008 Google Scholar
[34]	李元和, 卓志瑶, 王健, 黄君辉, 李叔伦, 倪海桥, 牛智川, 窦秀明, 孙宝权 2022 71 067804 Google Scholar Li Y H, Zhuo Z Y, Wang J, Huang J H, Li S L, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Dou X M, Sun B Q 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 067804 Google Scholar
[35]	Yu Y, Shang X J, Li M F, Zha G W, Xu J X, Wang L J, Wang G W, Ni H Q, Dou X, Sun B, Niu Z C 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 201103 Google Scholar
[36]	尚向军, 马奔, 陈泽升, 喻颖, 查国伟, 倪海桥, 牛智川 2018 67 227801 Google Scholar Shang X J, Ma B, Chen Z S, Yu Y, Zha G W, Ni H Q, Niu Z C 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 227801 Google Scholar
[37]	Wu X, Dou X, Ding K, Zhou P, Ni H, Niu Z, Jiang D, Sun B 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 252108 Google Scholar
[38]	丁琨, 武雪飞, 窦秀明, 孙宝权 2016 65 037701 Google Scholar Ding K, Wu X F, Dou X M, Sun B Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 037701 Google Scholar
[39]	徐章程, 贾国治, 孙亮, 姚江宏, 许京军, Hvam J M, 王占国 2005 54 5367 Google Scholar Xu Z C, Jia G Z, Sun L, Yao J H, Xu J J, Hvam J M, Wang Z G 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5367 Google Scholar
[40]	Itskevich I E, Lyapin S G, Troyan I A, Klipstein P C, Eaves L, Main P C, Henini M 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 R4250 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang G, Fafard S, Leonard D, Bowers J E, Merz J L, Petroff P M 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 64 2815 Google Scholar
[42]	Seufert J, Bacher G, Schömig H, Forchel A, Hansen L, Schmidt G, Molenkamp L W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 035311 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhou P Y, Dou X M, Wu X F, Ding K, Luo S, Yang T, Zhu H J, Jiang D S, Sun B Q 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 023510 Google Scholar
[44]	Eisaman M D, Fan J, Migdall A, Polyakov S V 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 071101 Google Scholar
[45]	Weber W H, Ford G W 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 125429 Google Scholar
[46]	Johnson P B, Christy R W 1972 Phys. Rev. B 6 4370 Google Scholar
[47]	Adachi S 2012 Handbook on Optical Constants of Metals (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing ) pp61–68
[48]	Adachi S 2012 The Handbook on Optical Constants of Semiconductors (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing) pp153–162
[49]	Saglimbeni F, Bianchi S, Gibson G, Bowman R, Padgett M, Di Leonardo R 2016 Opt. Express 24 27009 Google Scholar

[1]	李巧利, 李慎慎, 肖继军, 陈兆旭. 静水压力作用下(H₂dabco)[K(ClO₄)₃]结构与稳定性的第一性原理研究. , 2024, 73(14): 143101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240477
[2]	苏宇航, 张炼, 陶灿, 王宁, 马平准, 钟莹, 刘海涛. 金属镜面上纳米光学天线阵列自发辐射增强与定向辐射. , 2023, 72(7): 078101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222007
[3]	李元和, 卓志瑶, 王健, 黄君辉, 李叔伦, 倪海桥, 牛智川, 窦秀明, 孙宝权. 金纳米颗粒调控量子点激子自发辐射速率. , 2022, 71(6): 067804. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211863
[4]	高立科, 赵先豪, 刁心峰, 唐天宇, 唐延林. 第一性原理对CsSnBr₃施加静水压力后光电性质的探究. , 2021, 70(15): 158801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210397
[5]	李元和, 窦秀明, 孙宝权. 金纳米颗粒调控量子点激子自发辐射速率. , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211863
[6]	张志伟, 赵翠兰, 孙宝权. InAs/GaAs量子点1.3 μm单光子发射特性. , 2018, 67(23): 237802. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181592
[7]	罗亿, 王小林, 张汉伟, 粟荣涛, 马鹏飞, 周朴, 姜宗福. 光纤放大器放大自发辐射特性与高温易损点位置. , 2017, 66(23): 234206. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.234206
[8]	张伟, 石震武, 霍大云, 郭小祥, 彭长四. 脉冲激光原位辐照对InAs/GaAs(001)量子点生长的影响. , 2016, 65(11): 117801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.117801
[9]	苏丹, 窦秀明, 丁琨, 王海艳, 倪海桥, 牛智川, 孙宝权. 金纳米颗粒光散射提高InAs单量子点荧光提取效率. , 2015, 64(23): 235201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.235201
[10]	王媛, 董瑞新, 闫循领. 嵌入Ag纳米颗粒层的DNA忆阻器. , 2015, 64(4): 048402. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.048402
[11]	薛冰, 许银生, 李烟塬, 戚嘉妮, 鲁珊珊, 鲁克伦, 陈丽艳, 张绍骞, 戴世勋. Ag纳米颗粒增强的Ho3+/Tm3+共掺铋锗酸盐玻璃的2m发光研究. , 2014, 63(10): 107802. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.107802
[12]	李文生, 孙宝权. 电场调谐InAs量子点荷电激子光学跃迁. , 2013, 62(4): 047801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.047801
[13]	卢志鹏, 祝文军, 卢铁城. 高压下Fe从bcc到hcp结构相变机理的第一性原理计算. , 2013, 62(5): 056401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.056401
[14]	王文芳, 陈科, 邬静达, 文锦辉, 赖天树. 长寿命吸收过程对超快动力学过程测量的影响. , 2011, 60(11): 117802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.117802
[15]	宋禹忻, 俞重远, 刘玉敏. 沉积速率和生长停顿对InAs/GaAs量子点超晶格生长影响的综合分析. , 2008, 57(4): 2399-2403. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2399
[16]	胡良均, 陈涌海, 叶小玲, 王占国. Mn离子注入InAs/GaAs量子点结构材料的光电性质研究. , 2007, 56(8): 4930-4935. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4930
[17]	汤乃云, 陈效双, 陆卫. InAs/GaAs量子点的静压光谱压力系数研究. , 2005, 54(5): 2277-2281. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2277
[18]	程继新, 史强, 双丰, 朱清时. 多色强激光场与分子耦合制备长寿命局域模振动. , 1997, 46(6): 1079-1087. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.1079
[19]	程继新, 史强, 双丰, 朱清时. 强单色激光场与分子耦合制备长寿命局域模振动. , 1997, 46(5): 852-861. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.852
[20]	苏昉, 谢斌, 赵明文, 吴希俊. 纳米CaF2离子电导率和介电常数的静水压效应. , 1995, 44(5): 755-762. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.755

计量

文章访问数: 3638
PDF下载量: 49
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

静水压力调谐Ag纳米颗粒散射场下量子点激子寿命