-
铀同位素比(235U/238U)高精度测量在核能安全领域具有重要的研究意义和应用价值, 本文基于高灵敏度可调谐吸收光谱技术, 结合脉冲激光烧蚀产生等离子体的样品处理方式, 实现了固体材料中235U和238U铀同位素比的高精度测量. 实验测量选择λ = 394.4884 nm/394.4930 nm (vacuum)作为235U/238U分析线, 详细研究了缓冲气体及其压力对激光烧蚀等离子体中铀原子存在时间的影响. 结果表明氦气作为缓冲气体更有利于铀原子吸收光谱测量. 实验获得了测量铀原子吸收光谱的最佳测量条件, 并测量了235U含量分别为4.95%, 4.10%, 3.00%, 1.10%和0.25%的五种样品, 获得了235U和238U的高分辨率吸收光谱信号. 不同含量样品吸收光谱测量与统计分析表明, 235U吸收信号的线性度良好, 拟合相关系数为0.989, 检测限为0.033% (3σ), 吸收光谱测量重现性优于固定波长法. 激光烧蚀结合可调谐吸收光谱技术适用于铀同位素比测量分析, 在核燃料的同位素快速分析方面有很大的应用潜力.
High precision measurement of uranium isotope ratio (235U/238U) has important application in the field of nuclear energy safety. In this paper, based on high sensitivity tunable absorption spectroscopy technology, combined with the sample processing method of pulsed laser ablation plasma, high-precision measurement of uranium 235U/238U isotope ratio in solid material is realized. In the experimental measurement, transitions near 394.4884 nm/394.4930 nm (vacuum) are selected as the 235U/238U analytical lines. The influence of buffer gas and its pressure on the persistence time of uranium atom in laser ablated plasma are studied in detail. The experimental results show that different buffer gases have different ability to restrict the movement of particles in the plasma, which leads to different longitudinal expansion velocity of the plasma (perpendicular to the surface of the sample), and increases the persistence time of uranium atoms in the laser beam. The effect of pressure change on plasma evolution can be reduced by adding buffer gas. When helium is used as the buffer gas, the persistence time of uranium atoms in the plasma is longer, which can improve the selection space of data acquisition delay. In the ablation environment with helium, the electron number density of laser ablated plasma is relatively low, which can reduce the influence of Stark broadening effect and obtain narrower absorption lines, which is more conducive to the measurement of uranium atomic absorption spectrum. In order to reduce the influence of Doppler shift effect on absorption spectrum measurement and avoid misjudgment in spectrum analysis, it is more appropriate to carry out experimental measurement after 3μs sampling delay. Through experiments, the optimal conditions for measuring atomic absorption spectrum of uranium are obtained. Under these conditions, five different samples with 235U content of 4.95%, 4.10%, 3.00%, 1.10% and 0.25% respectively are measured, and the high-resolution absorption spectrum signals of 235U and 238U are obtained. The absorption spectra of samples with different content are measured and statistically analyzed, the 235U absorption signal has high linearity, the fitting correlation coefficient can reach 0.989, and the limit of detection is 0.033% (3σ). The stability test of absorption spectrum signal shows that the relative standard deviation of 238U, 235U and 235U / 238U signals are 2.054%, 2.152% and 0.524% respectively. The wavelength scanning mode is superior to the fixed wavelength spectrum measurement, and the influence of the energy fluctuation between different ablation pulses on the spectrum measurement is weakened by the wavelength scanning mode to a certain extent. The results show that laser ablation combined with absorption spectroscopy technology is suitable for uranium isotope ratio analysis and has great potential applications in rapid isotope analysis of nuclear fuel. -
Keywords:
- laser ablation /
- plasma /
- atomic absorption spectroscopy /
- isotopic ratio analysis
[1] Russo R E 1995 Appl. Spectrosc. 49 14
Google Scholar
[2] Chichkov B N, Momma C, Nolte S, Alvensleben F, Tünnermann A 1996 Appl. Phys. A 63 109
Google Scholar
[3] Russo R E, Mao X, Liu H, Gonzalez J, Mao S S 2002 Talanta 57 425
Google Scholar
[4] Harilal S S, Brumfield B E, LaHaye N L, Hartig K C, Phillips M C 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 021301
Google Scholar
[5] Miziolek A W, Palleschi V, Schechter I 2006 Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 27 257
Google Scholar
[6] Harilal S S, Lahaye N L, Phillips M C 2017 Opt. Express. 25 2312
Google Scholar
[7] Skrodzki P J, Shah N P, Taylor N, Hartig K C, Lahaye N L, Brumfield B E, Jovanovic I, Phillips M C, Harilal S S 2016 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 122 112
Google Scholar
[8] Smith C A, Martinez M A, Veirs D K, Cremers D A 2000 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 57 929
Google Scholar
[9] Cremers D A, Beddingfield A, Smithwick R, Chinni R C, Jones C R, Beardsley B, Karch L 2012 Appl. Spectrosc. 66 250
Google Scholar
[10] Chan C Y, Choi I, Mao X, Zorba V, Lam O P, Shuh D K, Russo R E 2016 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 122 31
Google Scholar
[11] Phillips M C, Brumfield B E, Lahaye N, Harilal S S, Hartig K C, Jovanovic I 2017 Scie. Rep 7 3784
Google Scholar
[12] Quentmeier A, Bolshov M, Niemax K 2001 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 56 45
Google Scholar
[13] Liu H, Quentmeier A, Niemax K 2002 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 57 1611
Google Scholar
[14] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Ohba H 2013 Appl. Phys. A 112 87
Google Scholar
[15] Miyabe M, Oba M, Jung K, Iimura H, Akaokaa K, Katoa M, Otobeb H, Khumaeni A, Wakaida I 2017 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 134 42
Google Scholar
[16] Taylor N R, Phillips M C 2014 Opt. lett. 39 594
Google Scholar
[17] 叶浩, 张骏昕, 梅海平, 黄尧, 袁子豪, 曹振松, 黄印博 2020 中国激光 47 299
Google Scholar
Ye H, Zhang J X, Mei H P, Huang Y, Yuan Z H, Cao Z S, Huang Y B 2020 Chin. J. Lasers 47 299
Google Scholar
[18] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Wakaida I 2010 Appl. Phys. A 101 65
Google Scholar
[19] Yan P, Luo W, Zhang J, Wang L 1992 Chin. J. Lasers 5 27
[20] Kramida Y, Ralchenko J, Reader N A NIST Atomic Spectra Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology http://physics.nist.gov/asd [2021-01-25]
[21] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Wakaida I, Watanabe K 2009 4th international conference on laser probing Nagoya, Japan, October 6–10, 2008 p30
[22] Man B Y, Wang X T, Liu A H 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 3509
Google Scholar
[23] 张树东, 陈冠英, 刘亚楠, 董晨钟 2002 原子核物理评论 19 206
Google Scholar
Zhang S D, Chen G Y, Liu Y N, Dong C Z 2002 Nucl. Phys. Rev. 19 206
Google Scholar
-
图 3 (a)等离子体透过率测量; (b)实验测量的235U/ 238U吸收光谱
Fig. 3. (a) Plasma transmittance measurement; (b) measured absorption spectrum of 235U/ 238U.
图 4 不同环境气体下测量结果比较(Air, He, Ar, N2)
Fig. 4. Comparison of measurement results under different ambient gases (Air, He, Ar, N2).
图 5 不同烧蚀环境下等离子体持续时间随样品池内压力的变化
Fig. 5. The persistence of ablation plasma changes with pressure.
图 8 不同含量样品235U/238U吸收光谱
Fig. 8. 235U/238U absorption spectra of samples with different concentration.
图 9 不同含量样品235U/238U吸收光谱及Voigt线型拟合光谱, 拟合曲线下部为拟合残差图
Fig. 9. 235U/238U absorption spectra and Voigt fitting spectra of samples with different concentration, the lower part of the fitted curve is the fitted residual graph.
图 10 235U丰度与吸收强度的定标曲线
Fig. 10. Calibration curve of 235U abundance and absorption intensity.
图 11 1.10%样品235U/238U吸收光谱及Voigt线型拟合光谱
Fig. 11. 235U/238U absorption spectrum and Voigt fitting spectrum of 1.10% sample.
图 12 235U/238U吸收光谱信号稳定性研究
Fig. 12. Study on the stability of 235U/238U absorption spectrum signal.
表 1 LAAS实验装置关键器件参数
Table 1. Key device parameters of LAAS experimental device.
实验装置关键器件 参数 探测激光器 线宽100 kHz 烧蚀激光器 波长1064 nm, 脉宽8 ns, 重复频率1—20 Hz, 单脉冲能量最大为200 mJ, 能量稳定性 ≤ 1% 带通滤光片 Semrock, 中心波长λ = 395 nm, 带宽Δλ = 11 nm 陷波滤光片 Thorlabs, 中心波长λ = 1064 nm, 带宽Δλ = 44 nm 光电探测器 Thorlabs, 探测带宽150 MHz 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 实验参数设置
Table 2. experimental parameter setting
实验
参数烧蚀激光
能量/ mJ采样延
时/μs缓冲
气体压力/kPa 扫描时
间/s数值 40 4 He 4 50
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Russo R E 1995 Appl. Spectrosc. 49 14
Google Scholar
[2] Chichkov B N, Momma C, Nolte S, Alvensleben F, Tünnermann A 1996 Appl. Phys. A 63 109
Google Scholar
[3] Russo R E, Mao X, Liu H, Gonzalez J, Mao S S 2002 Talanta 57 425
Google Scholar
[4] Harilal S S, Brumfield B E, LaHaye N L, Hartig K C, Phillips M C 2018 Appl. Phys. Rev. 5 021301
Google Scholar
[5] Miziolek A W, Palleschi V, Schechter I 2006 Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 27 257
Google Scholar
[6] Harilal S S, Lahaye N L, Phillips M C 2017 Opt. Express. 25 2312
Google Scholar
[7] Skrodzki P J, Shah N P, Taylor N, Hartig K C, Lahaye N L, Brumfield B E, Jovanovic I, Phillips M C, Harilal S S 2016 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 122 112
Google Scholar
[8] Smith C A, Martinez M A, Veirs D K, Cremers D A 2000 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 57 929
Google Scholar
[9] Cremers D A, Beddingfield A, Smithwick R, Chinni R C, Jones C R, Beardsley B, Karch L 2012 Appl. Spectrosc. 66 250
Google Scholar
[10] Chan C Y, Choi I, Mao X, Zorba V, Lam O P, Shuh D K, Russo R E 2016 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 122 31
Google Scholar
[11] Phillips M C, Brumfield B E, Lahaye N, Harilal S S, Hartig K C, Jovanovic I 2017 Scie. Rep 7 3784
Google Scholar
[12] Quentmeier A, Bolshov M, Niemax K 2001 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 56 45
Google Scholar
[13] Liu H, Quentmeier A, Niemax K 2002 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 57 1611
Google Scholar
[14] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Ohba H 2013 Appl. Phys. A 112 87
Google Scholar
[15] Miyabe M, Oba M, Jung K, Iimura H, Akaokaa K, Katoa M, Otobeb H, Khumaeni A, Wakaida I 2017 Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 134 42
Google Scholar
[16] Taylor N R, Phillips M C 2014 Opt. lett. 39 594
Google Scholar
[17] 叶浩, 张骏昕, 梅海平, 黄尧, 袁子豪, 曹振松, 黄印博 2020 中国激光 47 299
Google Scholar
Ye H, Zhang J X, Mei H P, Huang Y, Yuan Z H, Cao Z S, Huang Y B 2020 Chin. J. Lasers 47 299
Google Scholar
[18] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Wakaida I 2010 Appl. Phys. A 101 65
Google Scholar
[19] Yan P, Luo W, Zhang J, Wang L 1992 Chin. J. Lasers 5 27
[20] Kramida Y, Ralchenko J, Reader N A NIST Atomic Spectra Database, National Institute of Standards and Technology http://physics.nist.gov/asd [2021-01-25]
[21] Miyabe M, Oba M, Iimura H, Akaoka K, Maruyama Y, Wakaida I, Watanabe K 2009 4th international conference on laser probing Nagoya, Japan, October 6–10, 2008 p30
[22] Man B Y, Wang X T, Liu A H 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 3509
Google Scholar
[23] 张树东, 陈冠英, 刘亚楠, 董晨钟 2002 原子核物理评论 19 206
Google Scholar
Zhang S D, Chen G Y, Liu Y N, Dong C Z 2002 Nucl. Phys. Rev. 19 206
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 5515
- PDF下载量: 131
- 被引次数: 0
