搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

双层耦合非对称反应扩散系统中的超点阵斑图

刘富成 刘雅慧 周志向 郭雪 董梦菲

引用本文:
Citation:

双层耦合非对称反应扩散系统中的超点阵斑图

刘富成, 刘雅慧, 周志向, 郭雪, 董梦菲

Super-lattice patterns in two-layered coupled non-symmetric reaction diffusion systems

Liu Fu-Cheng, Liu Ya-Hui, Zhou Zhi-Xiang, Guo Xue, Dong Meng-Fei
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 通过线性耦合Brusselator模型和Lengyel-Epstein模型, 数值研究了双层耦合非对称反应扩散系统中图灵模之间的相互作用以及斑图的形成机理. 模拟结果表明, 合适的波数比以及相同的对称性是两个图灵模之间达到空间共振的必要条件, 而耦合强度则直接影响了图灵斑图的振幅大小. 为了保证对称性相同, 两个图灵模的本征值高度要位于一定的范围内. 只有失稳模为长波模时, 才能对另一个图灵模产生调制作用, 并形成多尺度时空斑图. 随着波数比的增加, 短波模子系统依次经历黑眼斑图、白眼斑图以及时序振荡六边形斑图的转变. 研究表明失稳图灵模与处于短波不稳定区域的高阶谐波模之间的共振是产生时序振荡六边形的主要原因.
    The coupling mechanism is one of most important approaches to generating multiple-scaled spatial-temporal patterns. In this paper, the mode interaction between two different Turing modes and the pattern forming mechanisms in the non-symmetric reaction diffusion system are numerically investigated by using a two-layered coupled model. This model is comprised of two different reaction diffusion models: the Brusselator model and the Lengyel-Epstein model. It is shown that the system gives rise to superlattice patterns if these two Turing modes satisfy the spatial resonance condition, otherwise the system yields simple patterns or superposition patterns. A suitable wave number ratio and the same symmetry are two necessary conditions for the spatial resonance of Turing modes. The eigenvalues of these two Turing modes can only vary in a certain range in order to make the two sub-system patterns have the same symmetry. Only when the long wave mode becomes the unstable mode, can it modulate the other Turing mode and result in the formation of spatiotemporal patterns with multiple scale. As the wave number ratio increases, the higher-order harmonics of the unstable mode appear, and the sub-system with short wave mode undergoes a transition from the black-eye pattern to the white-eye pattern, and finally to a temporally oscillatory hexagon pattern. It is demonstrated that the resonance between the Turing mode and its higher-order harmonics located in the wave instability region is the dominant mechanism of the formation of this oscillatory hexagon pattern. Moreover, it is found that the coupling strength not only determines the amplitudes of these patterns, but also affects their spatial structures. Two different types of white-eye patterns and a new super-hexagon pattern are obtained as the coupling strength increases. These results can conduce to understanding the complex spatial-temporal behaviors in the coupled reaction diffusion systems.
      通信作者: 刘富成, hdlfc@hbu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(11975089和11875014)、河北省优秀青年基金项目(A2017201099)和河北大学博士后项目资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Liu Fu-Cheng, hdlfc@hbu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975089, 11875014), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China (Grant No. A2017201099), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Hebei University, China
    [1]

    Ross T D, Lee H J, Qu Z J, Banks R A, Phillips R, Thomson M 2019 Nature 572 224Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wang Y, Zhang R P, Wang Z, Han Z J 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 050503Google Scholar

    [3]

    Gaskins D K, Pruc E E, Epstein I R, Dolnik M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 056001Google Scholar

    [4]

    Hannabuss J, Lera-Ramirez M, Cade N I, Fourniol F J, Nedelec F, Surrey T 2019 Curr. Biol. 29 2120Google Scholar

    [5]

    黄志精, 李倩昀, 白婧, 唐国宁 2019 68 110503Google Scholar

    Huang Z J, Li Q Y, Bai J, Tang G N 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 110503Google Scholar

    [6]

    Qian Y, Gao H Y, Yao C G, Cui X H, Ma J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 108902Google Scholar

    [7]

    Turing A M 1952 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 237 37Google Scholar

    [8]

    Guiu-Souto J, Carballido-Landeira J, Munuzuri A P 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 056205Google Scholar

    [9]

    Epstein I R, Berenstein I B, Dolnik M, Vanag V K, Yang L F, Zhabotinsky A M 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 397Google Scholar

    [10]

    张荣培, 王震, 王语, 韩子健 2018 67 050503Google Scholar

    Zhang R P, Wang Z, Wang Y, Han Z J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 050503Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yang L F, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 208303Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang L F, Epstein I R 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 026211Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu F C, He Y F, Pan Y Y 2010 Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 971Google Scholar

    [14]

    Catlla A J, McNamara A, Topaz C M 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 026215Google Scholar

    [15]

    白占国, 刘富成, 董丽芳 2015 64 210505Google Scholar

    Bai Z G, Liu F C, Dong L F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 210505Google Scholar

    [16]

    白占国, 董丽芳, 李永辉, 范伟丽 2011 60 118201Google Scholar

    Bai Z G, Dong L F, Li Y H, Fan W L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 118201Google Scholar

    [17]

    李新政, 白占国, 李燕 2019 68 068201Google Scholar

    Li X Z, Bai Z G, Li Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 068201Google Scholar

    [18]

    李新政, 白占国, 李燕, 赵昆, 贺亚峰 2013 62 220503Google Scholar

    Li X Z, Bai Z G, Li Y, Zhao K, He Y F 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 220503Google Scholar

    [19]

    Gambino G, Lombardo M C, Sammartino M, Sciacca V 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 042925Google Scholar

    [20]

    Biancalani T, Fanelli D, Di Patti F 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 046215Google Scholar

    [21]

    Berenstein I, Munuzuri A P, Yang L F, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 025101Google Scholar

    [22]

    Li J, Wang H L, Ouyang Q 2014 Chaos 24 023115Google Scholar

    [23]

    Berenstein I, Yang L, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 058302Google Scholar

    [24]

    Feng F, Yan J, Liu F C, He Y F 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 104702Google Scholar

    [25]

    Li C X, Dong L F, Feng J Y, Huang Y P 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 023505Google Scholar

    [26]

    Sun H Y, Dong L F, Fan W L, Mi Y L, Liu B B, Huang J Y, Li C X, Pan Y Y 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 123511Google Scholar

    [27]

    Han R, Dong L F, Huang J Y, Sun H Y, Liu B B, Mi Y L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 075204Google Scholar

  • 图 1  不同参数下耦合系统的色散关系 (a) Du1 = 12.6, Dv1 = 27.9, Du2 = 22, Dv2 = 420, α = 0.1; (b) Du1 = 5.3, Dv1 = 20, Du2 = 22, Dv2 = 500, α = 0.1

    Fig. 1.  Dispersion relations of coupled systems under different parameters: (a) Du1 = 12.6, Dv1 = 27.9, Du2 = 22, Dv2 = 420, α = 0.1; (b) Du1 = 5.3, Dv1 = 20, Du2 = 22, Dv2 = 500, α = 0.1.

    图 2  不同波数比下的超点阵斑图及其傅里叶频谱图 (a) 1∶2下的黑眼斑图, ${D_{u1}} = 13.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 27.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (b) 1∶3下的白眼斑图, ${D_{u1}} = 6$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (c) 1∶4下的白眼斑图, ${D_{u1}} = 3.4$, ${D_{v1}} = 6.96$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.9$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$. $\alpha = 0.1$

    Fig. 2.  Superlattice pattern and fourier spectrum under different wave number ratios: (a) Black eye pattern at 1∶2, ${D_{u1}} = 13.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 27.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (b) white eye pattern at 1∶3, ${D_{u1}} = 6$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (c) white eye pattern at 1∶4, ${D_{u1}} = 3.4$, ${D_{v1}} = 6.96$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.9$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$. $\alpha = 0.1$.

    图 3  波数比为1∶5时的时间振荡超六边形斑图, ${D_{u1}} = 2.2$, ${D_{v1}} = 4.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.9$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$, $\alpha = 0.1$ (a) 色散关系曲线; (b) 三个位置处u1的时间变化关系图; (c) 一个振荡周期内的斑图演化过程

    Fig. 3.  Oscillatory super-hexagon pattern with wave number ratio of 1∶5, ${D_{u1}} = 2.2$, ${D_{v1}} = 4.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.9$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$, $\alpha = 0.1$: (a) Dispersion curve; (b) time variation of u1 at three positions; (c) evolution of pattern in an oscillating period.

    图 4  不同本征值${h_2}$下的复杂斑图及其傅里叶频谱图 (a) 蜂窝状六边形斑图${h_2} = - 2.56$, ${D_{u1}} = 8.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (b) 白眼斑图${h_2} = - 1.3$, ${D_{u1}} = 7$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (c) 白眼斑图${h_2} = - 0.55$, ${D_{u1}} = 6$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (d) 超六边形斑图${h_2} = - 0.31$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.9$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.7$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (e) 条纹斑图${h_2} = 0.67$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 16$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$. $\alpha = 0.1$.

    Fig. 4.  Complex patterns and Fourier spectrum under different eigenvalues ${h_2}$: (a) Honeycomb hexagon pattern ${h_2} = - 2.56$, ${D_{u1}} = 8.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.5$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (b) white-eye pattern ${h_2} = - 1.3$, ${D_{u1}} = 7$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (c) white-eye pattern ${h_2} = - 0.55$, ${D_{u1}} = 6$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.3$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (d) super-hexagon pattern ${h_2} = - 0.31$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.9$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.7$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$; (e) stripe pattern ${h_2} = 0.67$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.5$, ${D_{v1}} = 16$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 400$. $\alpha = 0.1$.

    图 5  不同本征值$ {h_1}$下的复杂斑图及其傅里叶频谱图 (a) 白眼斑图, $ {h_1} = 0.2$, $ {D_{u1}} = 6.1$, $ {D_{v1}} = 12.7$, $ {D_{u2}} = 22.3$, $ {D_{v2}} = 403$; (b) 条纹点状斑图, $ {h_1} = 0.4$, $ {D_{u1}} = 6.1$, $ {D_{v1}} = 12.6$, $ {D_{u2}} = 20.3$, $ {D_{v2}} = 464$, $ \alpha = 0.1$

    Fig. 5.  Complex patterns and fourier spectrum under different eigenvalues ${h_1}$: (a) White-eye pattern, ${h_1} = 0.2$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.1$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.7$, ${D_{u2}} = 22.3$, ${D_{v2}} = 403$; (b) stripe-spot pattern, ${h_1} = 0.4$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.1$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.6$, ${D_{u2}} = 20.3$, ${D_{v2}} = 464$, $\alpha = 0.1$.

    图 6  不同耦合强度下的超六边形斑图 (a) 白眼斑图, $\alpha = 0.01$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.8$, ${D_{v1}} = 11.4$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 367$; (b) 白眼斑图, $\alpha = 0.1$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.3$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.9$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.8$, ${D_{v2}} = 395$; (c) 新型超六边形斑图, $\alpha = 0.2$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.1$, ${D_{v1}} = 13$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 432$; (d) 新白眼斑图, $\alpha = 0.3$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.3$, ${D_{v1}} = 13.98$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 460$

    Fig. 6.  Super-hexagon patterns with different coupling strength: (a) White-eye pattern, $\alpha = 0.01$, ${D_{u1}} = 5.8$, ${D_{v1}} = 11.4$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 367$; (b) white-eye pattern, $\alpha = 0.1$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.3$, ${D_{v1}} = 12.9$, ${D_{u2}} = 21.8$, ${D_{v2}} = 395$; (c) new super-hexagon pattern, $\alpha = 0.2$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.1$, ${D_{v1}} = 13$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 432$; (d) new white-eye pattern, $\alpha = 0.3$, ${D_{u1}} = 6.3$, ${D_{v1}} = 13.98$, ${D_{u2}} = 22$, ${D_{v2}} = 460$.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Ross T D, Lee H J, Qu Z J, Banks R A, Phillips R, Thomson M 2019 Nature 572 224Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wang Y, Zhang R P, Wang Z, Han Z J 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 050503Google Scholar

    [3]

    Gaskins D K, Pruc E E, Epstein I R, Dolnik M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 056001Google Scholar

    [4]

    Hannabuss J, Lera-Ramirez M, Cade N I, Fourniol F J, Nedelec F, Surrey T 2019 Curr. Biol. 29 2120Google Scholar

    [5]

    黄志精, 李倩昀, 白婧, 唐国宁 2019 68 110503Google Scholar

    Huang Z J, Li Q Y, Bai J, Tang G N 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 110503Google Scholar

    [6]

    Qian Y, Gao H Y, Yao C G, Cui X H, Ma J 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 108902Google Scholar

    [7]

    Turing A M 1952 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 237 37Google Scholar

    [8]

    Guiu-Souto J, Carballido-Landeira J, Munuzuri A P 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 056205Google Scholar

    [9]

    Epstein I R, Berenstein I B, Dolnik M, Vanag V K, Yang L F, Zhabotinsky A M 2008 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366 397Google Scholar

    [10]

    张荣培, 王震, 王语, 韩子健 2018 67 050503Google Scholar

    Zhang R P, Wang Z, Wang Y, Han Z J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 050503Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yang L F, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 208303Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang L F, Epstein I R 2004 Phys. Rev. E 69 026211Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu F C, He Y F, Pan Y Y 2010 Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 971Google Scholar

    [14]

    Catlla A J, McNamara A, Topaz C M 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 026215Google Scholar

    [15]

    白占国, 刘富成, 董丽芳 2015 64 210505Google Scholar

    Bai Z G, Liu F C, Dong L F 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 210505Google Scholar

    [16]

    白占国, 董丽芳, 李永辉, 范伟丽 2011 60 118201Google Scholar

    Bai Z G, Dong L F, Li Y H, Fan W L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 118201Google Scholar

    [17]

    李新政, 白占国, 李燕 2019 68 068201Google Scholar

    Li X Z, Bai Z G, Li Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 068201Google Scholar

    [18]

    李新政, 白占国, 李燕, 赵昆, 贺亚峰 2013 62 220503Google Scholar

    Li X Z, Bai Z G, Li Y, Zhao K, He Y F 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 220503Google Scholar

    [19]

    Gambino G, Lombardo M C, Sammartino M, Sciacca V 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 042925Google Scholar

    [20]

    Biancalani T, Fanelli D, Di Patti F 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 046215Google Scholar

    [21]

    Berenstein I, Munuzuri A P, Yang L F, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2008 Phys. Rev. E 78 025101Google Scholar

    [22]

    Li J, Wang H L, Ouyang Q 2014 Chaos 24 023115Google Scholar

    [23]

    Berenstein I, Yang L, Dolnik M, Zhabotinsky A M, Epstein I R 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 058302Google Scholar

    [24]

    Feng F, Yan J, Liu F C, He Y F 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 104702Google Scholar

    [25]

    Li C X, Dong L F, Feng J Y, Huang Y P 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 023505Google Scholar

    [26]

    Sun H Y, Dong L F, Fan W L, Mi Y L, Liu B B, Huang J Y, Li C X, Pan Y Y 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 123511Google Scholar

    [27]

    Han R, Dong L F, Huang J Y, Sun H Y, Liu B B, Mi Y L 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 075204Google Scholar

  • [1] 刘雅慧, 董梦菲, 刘富成, 田淼, 王硕, 范伟丽. 双层耦合非对称反应扩散系统中的振荡图灵斑图.  , 2021, 70(15): 158201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201710
    [2] 左娟莉, 杨泓, 魏炳乾, 侯精明, 张凯. 气力提升系统气液两相流数值模拟分析.  , 2020, 69(6): 064705. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191755
    [3] 李志旋, 岳明鑫, 周官群. 三维电磁扩散场数值模拟及磁化效应的影响.  , 2019, 68(3): 030201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181567
    [4] 周光雨, 陈力, 张鸿雁, 崔海航. 基于格子Boltzmann方法的自驱动Janus颗粒扩散泳力.  , 2017, 66(8): 084703. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.084703
    [5] 刘扬, 韩燕龙, 贾富国, 姚丽娜, 王会, 史宇菲. 椭球颗粒搅拌运动及混合特性的数值模拟研究.  , 2015, 64(11): 114501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.114501
    [6] 白占国, 刘富成, 董丽芳. 六边形格子态斑图的数值模拟.  , 2015, 64(21): 210505. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.210505
    [7] 刘乐柱, 张季谦, 许贵霞, 梁立嗣, 汪茂胜. 一种基于混沌系统部分序列参数辨识的混沌保密通信方法.  , 2014, 63(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.010501
    [8] 白占国, 李新政, 李燕, 赵昆. 气体放电系统中多臂螺旋波的数值分析.  , 2014, 63(22): 228201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.228201
    [9] 王新鑫, 樊丁, 黄健康, 黄勇. 双钨极耦合电弧数值模拟.  , 2013, 62(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.228101
    [10] 陈石, 王辉, 沈胜强, 梁刚涛. 液滴振荡模型及与数值模拟的对比.  , 2013, 62(20): 204702. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.204702
    [11] 尹增谦, 赵盼盼, 董丽芳, 房同珍. 有源等离子体在开放大气环境下的反应扩散过程研究.  , 2011, 60(2): 025206. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.025206
    [12] 白占国, 董丽芳, 李永辉, 范伟丽. 双层耦合Lengel-Epstein模型中的超点阵斑图.  , 2011, 60(11): 118201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.118201
    [13] 赵啦啦, 刘初升, 闫俊霞, 蒋小伟, 朱艳. 不同振动模式下颗粒分离行为的数值模拟.  , 2010, 59(4): 2582-2588. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2582
    [14] 蔡利兵, 王建国. 介质表面高功率微波击穿的数值模拟.  , 2009, 58(5): 3268-3273. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3268
    [15] 邓一鑫, 涂成厚, 吕福云. 非线性偏振旋转锁模自相似脉冲光纤激光器的研究.  , 2009, 58(5): 3173-3178. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3173
    [16] 卢玉华, 詹杰民. 三维方腔温盐双扩散的格子Boltzmann方法数值模拟.  , 2006, 55(9): 4774-4782. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4774
    [17] 张远涛, 王德真, 王艳辉. 大气压介质阻挡丝状放电时空演化数值模拟.  , 2005, 54(10): 4808-4815. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4808
    [18] 朱鹏飞, 钱列加, 薛绍林, 林尊琪. 基于“神光-Ⅱ”装置的飞秒拍瓦级光学参量啁啾脉冲放大的特性分析与系统设计.  , 2003, 52(3): 587-594. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.587
    [19] 丁伯江, 匡光力, 刘岳修, 沈慰慈, 俞家文, 石跃江. 低杂波电流驱动的数值模拟.  , 2002, 51(11): 2556-2561. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2556
    [20] 张旭, 沈柯. 环形腔中激光振荡输出的横向斑图及向光学湍流的转变.  , 2001, 50(11): 2116-2120. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2116
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7747
  • PDF下载量:  95
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-06
  • 修回日期:  2019-10-31
  • 刊出日期:  2020-01-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map