-
各种新型材料改善了人类的生产和生活, 二维纳米材料更以其独特的物理化学性质成为了研究的热点. 二硫化钼(MoS2)作为过渡金属硫化物的代表, 具有优异的机械性能和化学稳定性, 为研究其外场效应, 本文采用密度泛函理论方法优化了MoS2分子在0—0.1 a.u.(0—5.1423 × 1010 V/m)的静电场中基态几何结构, 得到了分子密立根电荷分布、偶极矩和总能量; 在此基础上, 采用含时密度泛函方法研究了MoS2分子紫外-可见(UV-Vis)吸收光谱在此静电场中的变化. 结果显示: 分子内电荷分布随着外电场的增强发生了整体转移; 伴随着电荷的整体转移, 电偶极矩随之增大, 而分子总能量随之减小; 分子最强UV-Vis吸收峰的波长为483 nm、摩尔吸收系数为461 L·mol–1·cm–1; 伴随着外电场的的逐渐增强, 分子激发态的摩尔吸收系数明显增大, UV-Vis光谱吸收峰显著红移, 外电场为0.08 a.u.时, 其吸收峰基本覆盖了整个可见光波长范围.A variety of new materials have improved the production and life of human beings. Two-dimensional nano materials have become a research hotspot due to their unique physical and chemical properties. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is representative of transition metal sulfide, with excellent mechanical properties and chemical stability. In order to study the influence of external electrical field on the molecular structure and spectrum, here in this work, the density functional theory with the hybrid B3LYP at Def2-TZVP level is employed to calculate the geometrical parameters of the ground state of MoS2 molecule under external electric fields ranging from 0 to 0.1 a.u. (0−5.1423 × 1010 V/m). Based on the optimized structures, the time-dependent density functional theory at the same level as the above is adopted to calculate the absorption wavelengths and the molar absorption coefficients for the first ten excited states of MoS2 molecule under external electric fields. The results show that the most strongest absorption band is located at 483 nm with a molar absorption coefficient of 461 L·mol–1·cm–1 in the UV-Vis absorption spectrum. The intramolecular charge transfers as a whole with the enhancement of the external electric field. The electric dipole moment increases with the external electric field rising, while the total molecular energy decreases with external electric field increasing. With the enhancement of the external electric field, the absorption peaks show a significant redshift. When the electric field increases to 0.1 a.u., the redshift is obvious. This can be explained as follows. When the external electric field is weaker, the electron transfer in the molecule is not significant. However, with the augment of the external electric field, the electron transfer in the molecule occurs as a whole. This makes the electron interaction between Mo and S weaker, thus the electron transition is more likely to occur. The energy required for excitation is reduced, and the wavelength of the excited state becomes longer, that is, the absorption peak takes a redshift. With the enhancement of the external electric field, the molar absorption coefficient increases obviously. This is because the overall transfer of the external electric field to the electron makes the electron cloud density of the MoS2 molecule increase and the number of electrons in transition augment. This work provides a theoretical basis for the utilization and improvement of MoS2 photoelectric properties, and also enlightens the application research of other photoelectric materials.
[1] Ayari A, Cobas E, Ogundadegbe O, Fuhrer M S 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 014507
Google Scholar
[2] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147
Google Scholar
[3] 陈敏强 2017 硕士学位论文 (太原: 太原理工大学)
Chen M Q 2017 M. S. Thesis (Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[4] Dominko R, Arcon D, Mrzel A, Zorko A, Cevc P, Venturini P, Gaberscek M, Remskar M, Mihailovic D 2002 Adv. Mater. 14 1531
Google Scholar
[5] 孙华婷 2018 硕士学位论文 (合肥: 安徽大学)
Sun H T 2018 M. S. Thesis (Hefei: Anhui University) (in Chinese)
[6] Mohammad H, Amir B F, Narayana R A 2015 Nat. Comms. 6 8616
Google Scholar
[7] Li W F, Yang Y M, Weber J K, Zhang G, Zhou R H 2016 ACS Nano 10 1829
Google Scholar
[8] Jafar A, Alireza K 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 137 201
Google Scholar
[9] Mateus H K, Jose R B, Marcia C B 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 222804
Google Scholar
[10] Wang P, Li W, Du C C, Zheng X, Sun X L, Yan Y G, Zhang J 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 140 284
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang Y D, Meng Z S, Shi Q, Gao H Q, Liu Y Z, Wang Y H, Rao D W, Deng K M, Lu R F 2017 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 375201
Google Scholar
[12] Ellert C, Corkum P B 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 R3170
Google Scholar
[13] 王藩侯, 黄多辉, 杨俊升 2013 62 073102
Google Scholar
Wang F H, Huang D H, Yang J S 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 073102
Google Scholar
[14] Ledingham K W D, Singhal R P, Smith D J, McCanny T, Graham P, Kilic H S, Peng W X, Wang S L, Langley A J, Taday P F, Kosmidis C 1998 J. Phys. Chem. A 102 3002
Google Scholar
[15] Rai D, Joshi H, Kulkarni A D, Gejji S P, Pathak R K 2007 J. Phys. Chem. A 111 9111
Google Scholar
[16] Iwamae A, Hishikawa A, Yamanouchi K 2000 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33 223
Google Scholar
[17] Ellert C, Stapelfeldt H, Constant E 1998 Phil. Trans. R. Sol. Lond. A 356 329
Google Scholar
[18] 杜建宾, 冯志芳, 韩丽君, 唐延林, 武德起 2018 67 223101
Google Scholar
Du J B, Feng Z F, Han L J, Tang Y L, Wu D Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 223101
Google Scholar
[19] 李世雄, 吴永刚, 令狐荣锋, 孙光宇, 张正平, 秦水介 2015 64 043101
Google Scholar
Li S X, Wu Y G, Linghu R F, Sun G Y Zhang Z P, Qin S J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 043101
Google Scholar
[20] 谢安东, 谢晶, 周玲玲, 伍冬兰, 阮文, 罗文浪 2016 原子与分子 33 989
Xie A D, Xie J, Zhou L L, Wu D L, Ruan W, Luo W L 2016 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 33 989
[21] Liu Q H, Li L Z, Li Y F, Gao Z X, Chen Z F, Lu J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 21556
Google Scholar
[22] Gemming S, Seifert G, Götz M, Fischer T, Ganteför G 2010 Phys. Status Solidi B 247 1069
Google Scholar
[23] Peverati R, Truhlar D G 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 13171
Google Scholar
[24] Liang B Y, Andrews L 2002 J. Phys. Chem. A 106 6945
Google Scholar
[25] Mayhall N J, Becher E L, Chowdhury A, Raghavachari K 2011 J. Phys. Chem. A 115 2291
Google Scholar
[26] Wang B, Wu N, Zhang X B, Huang X, Zhang Y F, Chen W K, Ding K N 2013 J. Phys. Chem. A 117 5632
Google Scholar
[27] Wang Y Y, Deng J J, Wang X, Che J T, Ding X L 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 6365
Google Scholar
[28] Wu D L, Tan B, Wan H J, Zang X Q, Xie A D 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 123101
Google Scholar
[29] Grozema F C, Telesca R, Joukman H T, Snijders J G 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 115 10014
Google Scholar
[30] 朱正和, 付依备, 高涛, 陈银亮, 陈晓军 2003 原子与分子 20 169
Google Scholar
Zhu Z H, Fu Y B, Gao T, Chen Y L, Chen X J 2003 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 20 169
Google Scholar
[31] Gemming S, Tamuliene J, Seifert G, Bertram N, Kim Y D, Ganteför G, 2006 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 82 161
Google Scholar
[32] Murugan P, Kumar V, Kawazoe Y, Ota N 2005 Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 71 063203
Google Scholar
[33] Jelena P, Jasna V, Tijana T I, Marko S, Radoš G 2018 Opt. Quant. Electron. 50 291
Google Scholar
-
图 3 分子电偶极矩u随外电场的变化
Fig. 3. The relation of dipole moment and electric field intensity of MoS2.
图 4 外电场下分子总能量E的变化
Fig. 4. The relationship between total energy of MoS2 molecule and electric field intensity.
图 5 不同外电场下的MoS2分子UV-Vis吸收光谱(Epsilon: 摩尔吸收系数)
Fig. 5. UV-Vis absorption spectra of MoS2 molecule under different external electric fields (Epsilon: molar absorption coefficient).
图 6 不同外电场下MoS2激发态的分子轨道(占据轨道, 填充了电子的分子轨道; 跃迁轨道, 分子被激发时, 电子从占据轨道跃迁到的空轨道; 轨道权重, 分子某一激发态, 构成轨道的各个组成部分的贡献, 图中给出的是所占比例最大的部分)
Fig. 6. Excited state orbital diagram of MoS2 molecule under different external electric fields (occupied orbitals, molecular orbitals filled with electrons; a transition orbital is a vacant orbital that an electron jumps from an occupied orbital to when a molecule is excited; orbital weight, the contribution of each component of an excited state of a molecule to the composition of the orbital, shown in the figure is the one with the largest proportion).
表 1 不同电场下原子Mo和S的电荷Q/a.u.
Table 1. The charges of Mo and S (unit: a.u.) of the MoS2 molecule under different external electric fields.
F 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 1Mo 0.782 0.752 0.659 0.488 0.237 –0.069 2S –0.391 –0.376 –0.329 –0.244 –0.119 0.034 3S –0.391 –0.376 –0.329 –0.244 –0.119 0.034 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Ayari A, Cobas E, Ogundadegbe O, Fuhrer M S 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 014507
Google Scholar
[2] Radisavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 147
Google Scholar
[3] 陈敏强 2017 硕士学位论文 (太原: 太原理工大学)
Chen M Q 2017 M. S. Thesis (Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology) (in Chinese)
[4] Dominko R, Arcon D, Mrzel A, Zorko A, Cevc P, Venturini P, Gaberscek M, Remskar M, Mihailovic D 2002 Adv. Mater. 14 1531
Google Scholar
[5] 孙华婷 2018 硕士学位论文 (合肥: 安徽大学)
Sun H T 2018 M. S. Thesis (Hefei: Anhui University) (in Chinese)
[6] Mohammad H, Amir B F, Narayana R A 2015 Nat. Comms. 6 8616
Google Scholar
[7] Li W F, Yang Y M, Weber J K, Zhang G, Zhou R H 2016 ACS Nano 10 1829
Google Scholar
[8] Jafar A, Alireza K 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 137 201
Google Scholar
[9] Mateus H K, Jose R B, Marcia C B 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 148 222804
Google Scholar
[10] Wang P, Li W, Du C C, Zheng X, Sun X L, Yan Y G, Zhang J 2017 Comput. Mater. Sci. 140 284
Google Scholar
[11] Zhang Y D, Meng Z S, Shi Q, Gao H Q, Liu Y Z, Wang Y H, Rao D W, Deng K M, Lu R F 2017 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29 375201
Google Scholar
[12] Ellert C, Corkum P B 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 R3170
Google Scholar
[13] 王藩侯, 黄多辉, 杨俊升 2013 62 073102
Google Scholar
Wang F H, Huang D H, Yang J S 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 073102
Google Scholar
[14] Ledingham K W D, Singhal R P, Smith D J, McCanny T, Graham P, Kilic H S, Peng W X, Wang S L, Langley A J, Taday P F, Kosmidis C 1998 J. Phys. Chem. A 102 3002
Google Scholar
[15] Rai D, Joshi H, Kulkarni A D, Gejji S P, Pathak R K 2007 J. Phys. Chem. A 111 9111
Google Scholar
[16] Iwamae A, Hishikawa A, Yamanouchi K 2000 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33 223
Google Scholar
[17] Ellert C, Stapelfeldt H, Constant E 1998 Phil. Trans. R. Sol. Lond. A 356 329
Google Scholar
[18] 杜建宾, 冯志芳, 韩丽君, 唐延林, 武德起 2018 67 223101
Google Scholar
Du J B, Feng Z F, Han L J, Tang Y L, Wu D Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 223101
Google Scholar
[19] 李世雄, 吴永刚, 令狐荣锋, 孙光宇, 张正平, 秦水介 2015 64 043101
Google Scholar
Li S X, Wu Y G, Linghu R F, Sun G Y Zhang Z P, Qin S J 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 043101
Google Scholar
[20] 谢安东, 谢晶, 周玲玲, 伍冬兰, 阮文, 罗文浪 2016 原子与分子 33 989
Xie A D, Xie J, Zhou L L, Wu D L, Ruan W, Luo W L 2016 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 33 989
[21] Liu Q H, Li L Z, Li Y F, Gao Z X, Chen Z F, Lu J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 21556
Google Scholar
[22] Gemming S, Seifert G, Götz M, Fischer T, Ganteför G 2010 Phys. Status Solidi B 247 1069
Google Scholar
[23] Peverati R, Truhlar D G 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 13171
Google Scholar
[24] Liang B Y, Andrews L 2002 J. Phys. Chem. A 106 6945
Google Scholar
[25] Mayhall N J, Becher E L, Chowdhury A, Raghavachari K 2011 J. Phys. Chem. A 115 2291
Google Scholar
[26] Wang B, Wu N, Zhang X B, Huang X, Zhang Y F, Chen W K, Ding K N 2013 J. Phys. Chem. A 117 5632
Google Scholar
[27] Wang Y Y, Deng J J, Wang X, Che J T, Ding X L 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 6365
Google Scholar
[28] Wu D L, Tan B, Wan H J, Zang X Q, Xie A D 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 123101
Google Scholar
[29] Grozema F C, Telesca R, Joukman H T, Snijders J G 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 115 10014
Google Scholar
[30] 朱正和, 付依备, 高涛, 陈银亮, 陈晓军 2003 原子与分子 20 169
Google Scholar
Zhu Z H, Fu Y B, Gao T, Chen Y L, Chen X J 2003 Chin. J. Atom. Mol. Phys. 20 169
Google Scholar
[31] Gemming S, Tamuliene J, Seifert G, Bertram N, Kim Y D, Ganteför G, 2006 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 82 161
Google Scholar
[32] Murugan P, Kumar V, Kawazoe Y, Ota N 2005 Phys. Rev. A: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 71 063203
Google Scholar
[33] Jelena P, Jasna V, Tijana T I, Marko S, Radoš G 2018 Opt. Quant. Electron. 50 291
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 12127
- PDF下载量: 194
- 被引次数: 0
