-
含氟利昂在内的含氯化合物在太阳光辐射下解离生成破坏臭氧的游离态氯原子, 是破坏大气臭氧层的主要元凶. 本文利用飞行时间质谱技术及离子速度成像技术研究了氟利昂F1110(四氯乙烯)分子在800 nm飞秒脉冲光作用下的多光子解离动力学. 利用飞行时间质谱探测技术, 得到了四氯乙烯在800 nm飞秒激光脉冲作用下发生多光子解离产生的碎片质谱, 发现了两个主要碎片离子C2Cl3+和 C2Cl2+. 对应的解离机理分别为单个C-Cl键断裂直接生产氯自由基C2Cl4+C2Cl3+ +Cl 和两个CCl 键断裂C2Cl4+C2Cl2++2Cl: 利用离子速度成像技术对这两种机理产生的碎片离子进行成像, 得到了C2Cl3+ 和C2Cl2+ 离子的速度影像. 分析发现这两个碎片离子的动能分布均可由两个高斯分布曲线拟合, 说明这两种解离机理分别还对应了两种解离通道. 通过影像分析得到了解离的平动能分布和角向分布各向异性参数等详尽的动力学信息. 通过高精度密度泛函理论计算对解离动力学进行了进一步的分析和讨论.The ozone layer which absorbs harmful solar UV radiation is an essential umbrella for human beings. However, a large number of exhausts of chlorine compounds including freon released by people in the atmosphere pose a great threat to the ozone layer. Freon dissociates into the product of chlorine radicals induced by UV sunlight radiation, which are found to be the main culprit for the destruction of atmospheric ozone. In this paper, time-of-flight mass spectrometry and velocity map imaging technique are coupled for investigating the multiphoton dissociation dynamics of Freon 1110 (C2Cl4, Tetrachloroethylene) induced by ultrafast short laser pulse on a femtosecond time scale at 800 nm. Fragments mass spectra of C2Cl4 are measured by time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Together with the parent ion C2Cl4+, two dominant fragment ions C2Cl3+ and C2Cl2+ are discovered in the multi-photon ionization and dissociation process in the experiment. By analyzing the above mass spectra, two corresponding photodissociation mechanisms are discussed and listed as follows: 1) C2Cl4+C2Cl3+ +Cl with single CCl bond breaking and direct production of Cl radical; 2) C2Cl4+C2Cl2+ +2Cl with double CCl bonds breaking and production of two Cl radicals. Also, ion images of these two observed fragment ions C2Cl3+ and C2Cl2+ are measured by velocity map imaging apparatus. The kinetic energy distributions of these two fragment ions are determined from the measured velocity map images. The kinetic energy distributions of both C2Cl3+ and C2Cl2+ can be well fitted by two Gaussion distributions. It indicates that both fragments C2Cl3+ and C2Cl2+ are from two production channels. The peak energies for each channel are fitted. More detailed photodissociation dynamics is obtained by analyzing the angular distribution of the generated fragment ions. The anisotropy parameter values are measured to be 0.46 (low energy channel) and 0.52 (high energy channel) for the fragment C2Cl3+, and 0.41 (low energy channel) and 0.66 (high energy channel) for the fragment C2Cl2+, respectively. The ratios between parallel transition and perpendicular transition are determined for all the observed channels for producing fragments C2Cl3+ and C2Cl2+. In addition, density functional theory calculations at a high-precision level are also performed on photodissociation dynamics for further analysis and discussion. The optimized geometries of ground state and ionic state of C2Cl4 are obtained and compared with density functional theory calculation at the level of B3LYP/6-311G++(d,p). The different structures of the ground and ionic states are given and discussed. The calculated information about ionic states of C2Cl4, including energy level and oscillator strength for the ionic excited states, is also given for analyzing the photodissociation dynamics of the C2Cl4 ions.
-
Keywords:
- freon /
- photodissociation /
- time-of-flight mass spectra /
- velocity map imaging
[1] Molina M J, Rowland F S 1974 Nature 249 810
[2] Farman J C, Gardiner B G, Shanklin J D 1985 Nature 315 207
[3] Wang D S, Kim M S, Choe J C, Ha T K 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 115 5454
[4] Butler J H, Battle M, Bender M L, Montzka S A, Clarke A D, Saltzman E S, Sucher C M, Severinghaus J P, Elkins J W 1999 Nature 399 749
[5] Hobe M 2007 Science 318 1878
[6] Schiermeier Q 2007 Nature 449 382
[7] Pope F D, Hansen J C, Bayes K D, Friedl R R, Sander S P 2007 J. Phys. Chem. A 111 4322
[8] Hobe M, Salawitch R J, Canty T, Keller-Rudek H, Moortgat G K, Groo J U, Mller R, Stroh F 2007 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 3055
[9] Crolin D, Piancastelli M N, Stolte W C, Lindle D W 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 244301
[10] Zuiderweg A, Kaiser J, Laube J C, Rockmann T, Holzinger R 2011 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 11 33173
[11] Chen H Y, Lien C Y, Lin W Y, Lee Y T, Lin J J 2009 Science 324 781
[12] Ma J, Ding L, Gu X J, Zheng H Y, Fang L, Zhang W J, Huang C Q, Wei L X, Yang B, Qi F 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 137 (in Chinese) [马靖, 丁蕾, 顾学军, 郑海洋, 方黎, 张为俊, 黄朝群, 卫立夏, 杨斌, 齐飞 2006 55 137]
[13] Herath N, Hause M L, Suits A G 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164301
[14] Saha A, Upadhyaya H P, Kumar A, Naik P D 2014 Chem. Phys. 428 127
[15] Eppink A T J B, Parker D H 1997 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68 3477
[16] Parker D H, Eppink A T J B 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 107 2357
[17] Liu Y Z, Xiao S R, Zhang C Y, Zheng G G, Chen Y Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 193301 (in Chinese) [刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 张成义, 郑改革, 陈云云 2012 61 193301]
[18] Liu Y Z, Gerber T, Knopp G 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 244208 (in Chinese) [刘玉柱, Gerber T, Knopp G 2014 63 244208]
[19] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, et al. 2004 Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, Pittsburgh, PA Gaussian Inc
[20] Watanabe K, Nakayama T, Mottl J 1962 J. Quant. Spectry. Radiative Transfer 2 369
[21] Zare R N 1972 Mol. Photochem. 4 1
-
[1] Molina M J, Rowland F S 1974 Nature 249 810
[2] Farman J C, Gardiner B G, Shanklin J D 1985 Nature 315 207
[3] Wang D S, Kim M S, Choe J C, Ha T K 2001 J. Chem. Phys. 115 5454
[4] Butler J H, Battle M, Bender M L, Montzka S A, Clarke A D, Saltzman E S, Sucher C M, Severinghaus J P, Elkins J W 1999 Nature 399 749
[5] Hobe M 2007 Science 318 1878
[6] Schiermeier Q 2007 Nature 449 382
[7] Pope F D, Hansen J C, Bayes K D, Friedl R R, Sander S P 2007 J. Phys. Chem. A 111 4322
[8] Hobe M, Salawitch R J, Canty T, Keller-Rudek H, Moortgat G K, Groo J U, Mller R, Stroh F 2007 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 3055
[9] Crolin D, Piancastelli M N, Stolte W C, Lindle D W 2009 J. Chem. Phys. 131 244301
[10] Zuiderweg A, Kaiser J, Laube J C, Rockmann T, Holzinger R 2011 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 11 33173
[11] Chen H Y, Lien C Y, Lin W Y, Lee Y T, Lin J J 2009 Science 324 781
[12] Ma J, Ding L, Gu X J, Zheng H Y, Fang L, Zhang W J, Huang C Q, Wei L X, Yang B, Qi F 2006 Acta Phys. Sin. 55 137 (in Chinese) [马靖, 丁蕾, 顾学军, 郑海洋, 方黎, 张为俊, 黄朝群, 卫立夏, 杨斌, 齐飞 2006 55 137]
[13] Herath N, Hause M L, Suits A G 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 164301
[14] Saha A, Upadhyaya H P, Kumar A, Naik P D 2014 Chem. Phys. 428 127
[15] Eppink A T J B, Parker D H 1997 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68 3477
[16] Parker D H, Eppink A T J B 1997 J. Chem. Phys. 107 2357
[17] Liu Y Z, Xiao S R, Zhang C Y, Zheng G G, Chen Y Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 193301 (in Chinese) [刘玉柱, 肖韶荣, 张成义, 郑改革, 陈云云 2012 61 193301]
[18] Liu Y Z, Gerber T, Knopp G 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 244208 (in Chinese) [刘玉柱, Gerber T, Knopp G 2014 63 244208]
[19] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, et al. 2004 Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, Pittsburgh, PA Gaussian Inc
[20] Watanabe K, Nakayama T, Mottl J 1962 J. Quant. Spectry. Radiative Transfer 2 369
[21] Zare R N 1972 Mol. Photochem. 4 1
计量
- 文章访问数: 6577
- PDF下载量: 199
- 被引次数: 0