-
突触串扰由相邻突触间神经递质的溢出引起, 对神经系统的放电特性及信号传输有着深远影响. 利用两个忆阻器模拟生物神经突触, 双向耦合Chialvo离散神经元和Rulkov离散神经元, 并考虑耦合状态下突触间的串扰行为, 构建一类忆阻突触耦合异质离散神经网络. 研究分析表明, 神经网络不动点的数量及稳定性依赖于突触串扰强度. 同时, 通过分析分岔图、相图、李雅普诺夫指数谱和时序图等发现, 随着突触串扰强度的变化, 神经网络表现出不同的共存放电行为. 此外, 基于神经元放电序列的相位差及同步因子, 研究了不同耦合强度及不同系统初始条件和参数情形下, 突触串扰强度对神经网络同步行为的影响.Synaptic crosstalk, which occurs due to the overflow of neurotransmitters between neighboring synapses, holds a crucial position in shaping the discharge characteristics and signal transmission within nervous systems. In this work, two memristors are employed to simulate biological neural synapses and bidirectionally coupled Chialvo discrete neuron and Rulkov discrete neuron. Thus, a heterogeneous discrete neural network with memristor-synapse coupling is constructed, with the crosstalk behavior between memristor synapses in the coupled state taken into account. The analysis demonstrates that the quantity and stability of fixed points within this neural network greatly depend on the strength of synaptic crosstalk. Additionally, through a thorough investigation of bifurcation diagrams, phase diagrams, Lyapunov exponents, and time sequences, we uncover the multi-stable state property exhibited by the neural network. This characteristic manifests as the coexistence of diverse discharge behaviors, which significantly change with the intensity of synaptic crosstalk. Interestingly, the introduction of control parameter into state variables can lead the bias to increase, and also the infinite stable states to occur in the neural network. Furthermore, we comprehensively study the influence of synaptic crosstalk strength on the synchronization behavior of the neural network, with consideration of various coupling strengths, initial conditions, and parameters. Our analysis, which is based on the phase difference and synchronization factor of neuronal discharge sequences, reveales that the neural network maintains phase synchronization despite the variations of the two crosstalk strengths. The insights gained from this work provide important support for elucidating the electrophysiological mechanisms behind the processing and transmission of biological neural information. Especially, the coexisting discharge phenomenon in the neural network provides an electrophysiological theoretical foundation for the clinical symptoms and diagnosis of the same neurological disease among different individuals or at different stages. And the doctors can predict the progression and prognosis of neurological disease based on the patterns and characteristics of coexisting discharge in patients, enabling them to adopt appropriate intervention measures and monitoring plans. Therefore, the research on coexisting discharge in the neural system contributes to the comprehensive treatment of nervous system disease.
-
Keywords:
- memristor /
- heterogeneous discrete neural network /
- synaptic crosstalk /
- coexisting discharge /
- phase synchronization
[1] 白婧, 关富荣, 唐国宁 2021 70 170502
Google Scholar
Bai J, Guan F R, Tang G N 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 170502
Google Scholar
[2] Stein R B, Gossen E R, Jones K E 2005 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6 389
[3] 安新磊, 乔帅, 张莉 2021 70 050501
Google Scholar
An X L, Qiao S, Zhang L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 050501
Google Scholar
[4] Tan F, Zhou L L, Lu J W, Quan, H Z, Liu K Y 2022 Eur. J. Control 70 100764
[5] 徐泠风, 李传东, 陈玲 2016 65 240701
Google Scholar
Xu L F, Li C D, Chen L 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 240701
Google Scholar
[6] Liu B, Peng X N, Li C L 2024 Int. J. Electron. Commun. 178 155283
[7] Guo M, Zhu Y L, Liu R Y, Zhao K X, Dou G 2021 Neurocomputing 472 12
[8] 徐聪, 王春华, 孙晶茹 2023 中国科学: 信息科学 53 164
Google Scholar
Xu C, Wang C H, Sun J R 2023 Sci. Sin. Inf. 53 164
Google Scholar
[9] 张美娇, 张建刚, 魏立祥, 南梦冉 2021 中国医学物理学杂志 38 1273
Zhang M J, Zhang J G, Wei L X, Nan M R 2021 Chin. J. Med. Phys. 38 1273
[10] Xu Q, Zhu D 2020 IETE Tech. Rev. 38 563
[11] Lu Y C, Li H M, Li C L 2023 Neurocomputing 544 126246
Google Scholar
[12] Li C L, Yang Y Y, Yang X B, Zi X Y, Xiao F L 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 108 1697
Google Scholar
[13] Li C L, Wang X, Du J R, Li Z J 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 21333
Google Scholar
[14] Tian Z K, Zhou D 2019 Front. Comput. Neurosci. 14 40
[15] Ma M L, Xiong K L, Li Z J Sun Y C 2023 Mathematics 11 375
Google Scholar
[16] Bashkirtseva I A, Nasyrova V, Ryashko L B 2018 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 110 76
Google Scholar
[17] Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg M H R 1996 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 6 2343
Google Scholar
[18] Girardi-Schappo M, Tragtenberg M H, Kinouchi O 2013 J. Neurosci. Methods 220 116
Google Scholar
[19] Rosenblatt F 1963 Am. J. Psychol. 76 705
Google Scholar
[20] Li H D, Li C L, He S B 2023 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 33 2350032
Google Scholar
[21] 郭慧朦, 梁燕, 董玉姣, 王光义 2023 72 070501
Google Scholar
Guo H M, Liang Y, Dong Y J, Wang G Y 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 070501
Google Scholar
[22] Zhou L L, Lin H C, Tan F 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 173 113643
Google Scholar
[23] 秦铭宏, 赖强, 吴永红 2022 71 160502
Google Scholar
Qin M H, Lai Q, Wu Y H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160502
Google Scholar
[24] 吴朝俊, 方礼熠, 杨宁宁 2024 73 010501
Google Scholar
Wu C J, Fang L Y, Yang N N 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 010501
Google Scholar
[25] Chua L O 2005 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 15 3435
Google Scholar
[26] Jin P P, Wang G Y, Liang Y, Iu H H, Chua L O 2021 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap. 68 4419
Google Scholar
[27] Lai Q, Yang L 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 165 112781
Google Scholar
[28] Li K X, Bao H, Li H Z, Ma J, Hua Z Y, Bao B C 2021 IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 18 1726
[29] Lu Y M, Wang C H, Deng Q L, Xu C 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 060502
Google Scholar
[30] Kawahara M, Kato‐Negishi M, Tanaka K 2017 Metallomics 9 619
Google Scholar
[31] A N Shrivastava, A Triller, W Sieghart 2011 Front. Cell. Neurosci. 5 7
[32] Li Z J, Yi Z 2022 Electron. Lett. 58 539
Google Scholar
[33] Ding D W, Chen X Y, Yang Z L, Hu Y B, Wang M Y, Zhang H W, Zhang X 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 158 112014
Google Scholar
[34] Li Z J, Peng C, Wang M J, Ma M L 2024 Indian J. Phys. 98 1043
Google Scholar
[35] Ma M L, Xiong K L, Li Z J, He S B 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 028706
Google Scholar
[36] Pool R 1989 Science 243 604
Google Scholar
[37] Adhikari S P, Sah M P, Kim H, Chua L O 2013 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap. 60 3008
Google Scholar
[38] Ren L J, Mou J, Banerjee S, Zhang Y S 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 167 113024
Google Scholar
[39] Li C, Yi C, Li Y, Mitro S, Wang Z 2024 Chaos 34 031102
Google Scholar
[40] Ma C G, Mou J, Xiong L, Banerjee S, Liu T M, Han X T 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 103 2867
Google Scholar
[41] Li C, Wang X, Chen G 2017 Nonlinear Dyn. 90 1335
Google Scholar
[42] Li C, Gao Y, Lei T, Li RY, Xu Y 2024 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 34 2450008
Google Scholar
-
图 1 忆阻器的电压-电流特性曲线 (a) $\varphi $(0) = 0.1, ω = 0.1, A = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4; (b) $\varphi $(0) = 0.1, A = 0.5, ω = 0.2, 0.4, 0.8; (c) A = 0.5, ω = 0.2, $\varphi $(0) = –3.0, 0.1, 3.0
Fig. 1. Hysteresis loop for discrete memristor: (a) $\varphi $(0) = 0.1, ω = 0.1 and A = 0.2, 0.3, 0.4; (b) $\varphi $(0) = 0.1, A = 0.5 and ω = 0.2, 0.4, 0.8; (c) A = 0.5, ω = 0.2 and $\varphi $(0) = –3.0, 0.1, 3.0.
图 4 不同初始条件时, 状态变量x1(n)关于p1的分岔图 (a) (1, 1, 1, –1, 1, 0); (b) (1, 1, 1, –2.4, 1, 0); (c) (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0); (d) (1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0)
Fig. 4. Bifurcation diagrams of state variable x1(n) versus p1 under different initial conditions: (a) (1, 1, 1, –1, 1, 0); (b) (1, 1, 1, –2.4, 1, 0); (c) (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0); (d) (1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0).
图 5 p1取不同值时, 神经网络的共存吸引子及共存放电序列 (a)—(c) p1 = –0.8; (d)—(f) p1 = –0.4; (g)—(i) p1 = 0.2; (j)—(l) p1 = 0.8
Fig. 5. Coexisting attractors and coexisting discharge sequences under different p1 value: (a)–(c) p1 = –0.8; (d)–(f) p1 = –0.4; (g)–(i) p1 = 0.2; (j)–(l) p1 = 0.8.
图 6 不同初始条件时状态变量x1(n)关于p2的分岔图 (a) (1, 1, 1, –5, 1, 0); (b) (1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 0); (c) (1, 1, 1, –1, 1, 0); (d) (1, 1, 1, –3, 1, 0)
Fig. 6. Bifurcation diagrams of state variable x1(n) versus p2 under different initial conditions: (a) (1, 1, 1, –5, 1, 0); (b) (1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 0); (c) (1, 1, 1, –1, 1, 0); (d) (1, 1, 1, –3, 1, 0).
图 7 不同p2值时神经网络的共存吸引子及共存放电序列 (a)—(c) p2 = –1.1; (d)—(f) p2 = –0.4; (g)—(i) p2 = 0.2; (j)—(l) p2 = 0.8
Fig. 7. Coexisting attractors and coexisting discharge sequences under different p2 value: (a)–(c) p2 = –0.7; (d)–(f) p2 = –0.4; (g)–(i) p2 = 0.2; (j)–(l) p2 = 0.8.
图 8 (a), (b) 状态变量x2, y2关于参数m的分岔图; (c)关于参数m的李雅普诺夫指数图
Fig. 8. (a), (b) Bifurcation diagram and (c) Lyapunov exponent versus m.
图 9 不同m取值时 (a) x2-y2的相图; (b), (c)状态变量x2, y2的放电序列
Fig. 9. For different values of m: (a) x2-y2 phase diagrams; (b), (c) discharge sequences for state variables x2, y2.
图 10 不同耦合强度k (a) p1对同步因子的影响; (b) p1对相位差的影响
Fig. 10. For different k: (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p1; (b) dependence of phase difference on p1.
图 11 不同初始值y2(0) (a) p1对同步因子的影响; (b) p1对相位差的影响
Fig. 11. For different y2(0): (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p1; (b) dependence of phase difference on p1.
图 12 不同系统参数a2 (a) p1对同步因子的影响; (b) p1对相位差的影响
Fig. 12. For different a2: (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p1; (b) dependence of phase difference on p1.
图 13 (a) p1 = –5时的时间序列; (b) p1 = –5时的相位差; (c) p1 = 5时的时间序列; (d) p1 = 5时的相位差
Fig. 13. (a) Time series when p1 = –5; (b) phase difference when p1 = –5; (d) time series when p1 = 5; (d) phase difference when p1 = 5.
图 14 不同耦合强度k (a) p2对同步因子的影响; (b) p2对相位差的影响
Fig. 14. For different k: (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p2; (b) dependence of phase difference on p2.
图 15 不同初始值y2(0) (a) p2对同步因子的影响; (b) p2对相位差的影响
Fig. 15. For different y2(0): (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p2; (b) dependence of phase difference on p2.
图 16 不同参数a2 (a) p2对同步因子的影响; (b) p2对相位差的影响
Fig. 16. For different a2: (a) Dependence of synchronization factor on p2; (b) dependence of phase difference on p2.
图 17 (a) p2 = –5时的时间序列; (b) p2 = –5时的相位差; (c) p2 = 5时的时间序列; (d) p2 = 5时的相位差.
Fig. 17. (a) Time series when p2 = –5; (b) phase difference when p2 = –5; (d) time series when p2 = 5; (d) phase difference when p2 = 5.
表 1 神经网络的平衡点、特征值和稳定性
Table 1. Equilibrium points, eigenvalues, and stability of neural network.
(p1, p2) (x1(n), y2(n), $\varphi $1(n), $\varphi $2(n)) 特征值 稳定性 (0.1, 0.1) (0.0342, 0.001, 0.0323, 0.0086) –0.5593, 0.8269, 0.8889, 0.9994±0.0022i, 1 不稳定鞍焦点 (0.0352, 0.001, 0.036, –0.3372) –0.5593, 0.8509, 0.8291, 0.8881, 0.9990, 0.9996 不稳定鞍结点 (0.0392, 0.0021, –0.2489, –0.3372) –0.5587, 0.8296, 0.9425, 0.9017, 0.8926, 0.9994 不稳定鞍结点 (168.8416, 0.0715, –0.7368, –0.3416) 0, 0.8900, –0.5580, 0.1857, 0.8236, 0.9994 不稳定鞍结点 (1, 1) (0.0339, 0.0009, 0.0973, –0.0618) –0.5589, 0.8097, 0.8892, 0.9953±0.0015i, 0.9995 不稳定鞍焦点 (0.0347, 0.0018, 0.1062, –0.3375) –0.5586, 0.8277±0.0047i, 0.8890, 0.9955, 0.9994 不稳定鞍焦点 (0.0383, 0.0031–0.224, –0.3365) –0.5569, 0.8305, 0.8838±0.0020i, 0.9645, 0.9994 不稳定鞍焦点 (168.8425, 0.1017, –0.7368, –0.3416) 0, 0.89, –0.5457, 0.1857, 0.8113, 0.9994 不稳定鞍结点 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 白婧, 关富荣, 唐国宁 2021 70 170502
Google Scholar
Bai J, Guan F R, Tang G N 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 170502
Google Scholar
[2] Stein R B, Gossen E R, Jones K E 2005 Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6 389
[3] 安新磊, 乔帅, 张莉 2021 70 050501
Google Scholar
An X L, Qiao S, Zhang L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 050501
Google Scholar
[4] Tan F, Zhou L L, Lu J W, Quan, H Z, Liu K Y 2022 Eur. J. Control 70 100764
[5] 徐泠风, 李传东, 陈玲 2016 65 240701
Google Scholar
Xu L F, Li C D, Chen L 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 240701
Google Scholar
[6] Liu B, Peng X N, Li C L 2024 Int. J. Electron. Commun. 178 155283
[7] Guo M, Zhu Y L, Liu R Y, Zhao K X, Dou G 2021 Neurocomputing 472 12
[8] 徐聪, 王春华, 孙晶茹 2023 中国科学: 信息科学 53 164
Google Scholar
Xu C, Wang C H, Sun J R 2023 Sci. Sin. Inf. 53 164
Google Scholar
[9] 张美娇, 张建刚, 魏立祥, 南梦冉 2021 中国医学物理学杂志 38 1273
Zhang M J, Zhang J G, Wei L X, Nan M R 2021 Chin. J. Med. Phys. 38 1273
[10] Xu Q, Zhu D 2020 IETE Tech. Rev. 38 563
[11] Lu Y C, Li H M, Li C L 2023 Neurocomputing 544 126246
Google Scholar
[12] Li C L, Yang Y Y, Yang X B, Zi X Y, Xiao F L 2022 Nonlinear Dyn. 108 1697
Google Scholar
[13] Li C L, Wang X, Du J R, Li Z J 2023 Nonlinear Dyn. 111 21333
Google Scholar
[14] Tian Z K, Zhou D 2019 Front. Comput. Neurosci. 14 40
[15] Ma M L, Xiong K L, Li Z J Sun Y C 2023 Mathematics 11 375
Google Scholar
[16] Bashkirtseva I A, Nasyrova V, Ryashko L B 2018 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 110 76
Google Scholar
[17] Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg M H R 1996 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 6 2343
Google Scholar
[18] Girardi-Schappo M, Tragtenberg M H, Kinouchi O 2013 J. Neurosci. Methods 220 116
Google Scholar
[19] Rosenblatt F 1963 Am. J. Psychol. 76 705
Google Scholar
[20] Li H D, Li C L, He S B 2023 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 33 2350032
Google Scholar
[21] 郭慧朦, 梁燕, 董玉姣, 王光义 2023 72 070501
Google Scholar
Guo H M, Liang Y, Dong Y J, Wang G Y 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 070501
Google Scholar
[22] Zhou L L, Lin H C, Tan F 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 173 113643
Google Scholar
[23] 秦铭宏, 赖强, 吴永红 2022 71 160502
Google Scholar
Qin M H, Lai Q, Wu Y H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 160502
Google Scholar
[24] 吴朝俊, 方礼熠, 杨宁宁 2024 73 010501
Google Scholar
Wu C J, Fang L Y, Yang N N 2024 Acta Phys. Sin. 73 010501
Google Scholar
[25] Chua L O 2005 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 15 3435
Google Scholar
[26] Jin P P, Wang G Y, Liang Y, Iu H H, Chua L O 2021 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap. 68 4419
Google Scholar
[27] Lai Q, Yang L 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 165 112781
Google Scholar
[28] Li K X, Bao H, Li H Z, Ma J, Hua Z Y, Bao B C 2021 IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 18 1726
[29] Lu Y M, Wang C H, Deng Q L, Xu C 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 060502
Google Scholar
[30] Kawahara M, Kato‐Negishi M, Tanaka K 2017 Metallomics 9 619
Google Scholar
[31] A N Shrivastava, A Triller, W Sieghart 2011 Front. Cell. Neurosci. 5 7
[32] Li Z J, Yi Z 2022 Electron. Lett. 58 539
Google Scholar
[33] Ding D W, Chen X Y, Yang Z L, Hu Y B, Wang M Y, Zhang H W, Zhang X 2022 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 158 112014
Google Scholar
[34] Li Z J, Peng C, Wang M J, Ma M L 2024 Indian J. Phys. 98 1043
Google Scholar
[35] Ma M L, Xiong K L, Li Z J, He S B 2024 Chin. Phys. B 33 028706
Google Scholar
[36] Pool R 1989 Science 243 604
Google Scholar
[37] Adhikari S P, Sah M P, Kim H, Chua L O 2013 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap. 60 3008
Google Scholar
[38] Ren L J, Mou J, Banerjee S, Zhang Y S 2023 Chaos, Solitons Fractals 167 113024
Google Scholar
[39] Li C, Yi C, Li Y, Mitro S, Wang Z 2024 Chaos 34 031102
Google Scholar
[40] Ma C G, Mou J, Xiong L, Banerjee S, Liu T M, Han X T 2021 Nonlinear Dyn. 103 2867
Google Scholar
[41] Li C, Wang X, Chen G 2017 Nonlinear Dyn. 90 1335
Google Scholar
[42] Li C, Gao Y, Lei T, Li RY, Xu Y 2024 Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 34 2450008
Google Scholar
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1711
- PDF下载量: 72
- 被引次数: 0
