搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

用于铁电体复杂畴结构模拟的布朗方程

欧阳鑫健 张紫阳 张锋 张佳乐 王大威

引用本文:
Citation:

用于铁电体复杂畴结构模拟的布朗方程

欧阳鑫健, 张紫阳, 张锋, 张佳乐, 王大威

Brown’s equation for the simulation of complex domain structures in ferroelectrics

Ouyang Xin-Jian, Zhang Zi-Yang, Zhang Feng, Zhang Jia-Le, Wang Da-Wei
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 铁电材料在室温下具有可以在外加电场作用下改变方向的自发极化, 不同方向的极化在材料内部形成畴结构, 会对其物理特性和实际应用具有显著影响. 本文将最初用于微磁模拟的布朗方程引入铁电材料的大尺度模拟中, 研究其中可能出现的重要畴结构. 在以有效哈密顿量方法为基础推导出铁电材料中关于电偶极子的布朗方程后, 以${\rm{BaTiO_3}}$, ${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$块体和${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$/${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$/${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$夹心结构等钙钛矿铁电材料为研究对象, 验证了布朗方程的有效性并讨论了其中的多种畴结构, 如周期性条带状畴、涡旋型拓扑畴结构等, 并与相关实验结果进行了对比分析.
    Ferroelectric material possesses spontaneous polarization at room temperature, which can be switched by an external electric field. The diverse domain structures within ferroelectric materials, consisting of polarizations in various directions, often significantly affect their physical properties and practical applications. Numerical simulations can aid in comprehending and validating the complex domains observed in experiments. They can also provide guidance for controlling such structures. One popular method for finding dipole configurations is to create an energy model and employ it in Monte-Carlo simulations to find dipole configuration. However, since these simulations usually reaches the ground state of the system (the state with the lowest global energy), they often miss the dipole configurations of interest, such as topological domain structures, which are usually metastable.Here, in order to simulate complex domain, we introduce Brown's equation, which is originally used for micromagnetic simulation, into the large-scale simulation of ferroelectric materials. Using the effective Hamiltonian as the energy model, we derive the Brown's equations with respect to the electric dipoles in ferroelectric materials, and invesitgate perovskites such as${\rm{BaTiO_3}}$ bulk, ${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$ bulk, and ${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$/${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$/${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$ sandwiched structures. We demonstrate the reliability and feasibility of Brown's equation in ferroelectrics through the simulation of ${\rm{BaTiO_3}}$ bulk and ${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$ bulk, which are consistent with experiments. Then, using Brown's equation derived in our work, we obtain various domain structures in ${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$/${\rm{PbTiO_3}}$/${\rm{SrTiO_3}}$ sandwiched structures, including periodic stripe domains and vortex domains. The simulation results are compared with related exprimental results.
      通信作者: 王大威, dawei.wang@xjtu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11974268, 12111530061)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Wang Da-Wei, dawei.wang@xjtu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11974268, 12111530061)
    [1]

    Seidel J, Ramesh R, Scott J, Catalan G 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 119Google Scholar

    [2]

    Nataf G F, Guennou M, Gregg J M, Meier D, Hlinka J, Salje E K H, Kreisel J 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 634Google Scholar

    [3]

    Scott J 2016 Ferroelectrics 503 117Google Scholar

    [4]

    谭丛兵, 钟向丽, 王金斌 2020 69 127702Google Scholar

    Tan C B, Zhong X L, Wang J B 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127702Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lu X M, Huang F Z, Zhu J S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tian G, Yang W, Chen D, Fan Z, Hou Z, Alexe M, Gao X 2019 Natl. Sci. Rev. 6 684Google Scholar

    [7]

    Das S, Tang Y L, Hong Z, Gonçalves M A P, McCarter M R, Klewe C, Nguyen K X, Gómez-Ortiz F, Shafer P, Arenholz E, Stoica V A, Hsu S L, Wang B, Ophus C, Liu J F, Nelson C T, Saremi S, Prasad B, Mei A B, Schlom D G, Íñiguez J, García-Fernández P, Muller D A, Chen L Q, Junquera J, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2019 Nature 568 368Google Scholar

    [8]

    Huang J, Tan P, Wang F, Li B 2022 Crystals 12 786Google Scholar

    [9]

    Das S, Ghosh A, McCarter M R, Hsu S L, Tang Y L, Damodaran A R, Ramesh R, Martin L W 2018 APL Mater. 6 100901Google Scholar

    [10]

    Seidel J 2016 Topological Structures in Ferroic Materials, volume 228 of Springer Series in Materials Science (Cham: Springer International Publishing)

    [11]

    Lu L, Nahas Y, Liu M, Du H, Jiang Z, Ren S, Wang D, Jin L, Prokhorenko S, Jia C L, Bellaiche L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 177601Google Scholar

    [12]

    Marton P, Rychetsky I, Hlinka J 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 144125Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhong W, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K M 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 6301Google Scholar

    [14]

    Chen L Q 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 1835Google Scholar

    [15]

    Liu J, Chen W, Wang B, Zheng Y 2014 Materials 7 6502Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jiang Z, Xu B, Li F, Wang D, Jia C L 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 014105Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wojdeł J C, Íñiguez J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 247603Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhong W, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 1861Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu Y, Tang Y L, Zhu Y L, Wang W Y, Ma X L 2016 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3 1600342Google Scholar

    [20]

    Brown W F 1941 Phys. Rev. 60 139Google Scholar

    [21]

    Brown W F 1940 Phys. Rev. 58 736Google Scholar

    [22]

    Aharoni A, et al. 2000 Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism (Vol. 109) (Clarendon Press)

    [23]

    García-Palacios J L, Lázaro F J 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 14937Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kumar D, Adeyeye A O 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 343001Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhu B, Lo C C H, Lee S J, Jiles D C 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7009Google Scholar

    [26]

    Shen K, Tatara G, Wu M W 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 085203Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li B L, Liu X P, Fang F, Zhu J L, Liu J M 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 014107Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang D, Liu J, Zhang J, Raza S, Chen X, Jia C L 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 162 314Google Scholar

    [29]

    Hong Z, Damodaran A R, Xue F, Hsu S L, Britson J, Yadav A K, Nelson C T, Wang J J, Scott J F, Martin L W, et al. 2017 Nano Lett. 17 2246Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen L Q, Zhao Y 2022 Prog. Mater. Sci. 124 100868Google Scholar

    [31]

    Petković M, Petković L, Herceg ff 2010 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 233 1755Google Scholar

    [32]

    Sugiura H, Hasegawa T 2019 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 358 136Google Scholar

    [33]

    黄云清, 舒适, 陈艳萍 2009 数值计算方法 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Huang Y Q, Shu S, Chen Y P 2009 Numerical Computation Method (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [34]

    Nishimatsu T, Iwamoto M, Kawazoe Y, Waghmare U V 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 134106Google Scholar

    [35]

    Nishimatsu T, Aoyagi K, Kiguchi T, J Konno T, Kawazoe Y, Funakubo H, Kumar A, V Waghmare U 2012 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 124702Google Scholar

    [36]

    Nishimatsu T, Grünebohm A, Waghmare U V, Kubo M 2016 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 114714Google Scholar

    [37]

    Kwei G H, Lawson A C, Billinge S J L, Cheong S W 1993 J. Phys. Chem. 97 2368Google Scholar

    [38]

    Bersuker I B 1966 Phys. Lett. 20 589Google Scholar

    [39]

    Ravel B, Stern E A, Vedrinskii R I, Kraizman V 1998 Ferroelectrics 206 407Google Scholar

    [40]

    Liu J, Jin L, Jiang Z, Liu L, Himanen L, Wei J, Zhang N, Wang D, Jia C L 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 244122Google Scholar

    [41]

    Tinte S, Stachiotti M, Sepliarsky M, Migoni R, Rodriguez C 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 9679Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhang F, Zhang J, Jing H, Li Z, Wang D, Jia C L 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 024106Google Scholar

    [43]

    Tadmor E, Waghmare U, Smith G, Kaxiras E 2002 Acta Mater. 50 2989Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sani A, Hanfland M, Levy D 2002 J. Solid State Chem. 167 446Google Scholar

    [45]

    Abid A Y, Sun Y, Hou X, Tan C, Zhong X, Zhu R, Chen H, Qu K, Li Y, Wu M, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1Google Scholar

    [46]

    Lemee N, Infante I C, Hubault C, Boulle A, Blanc N, Boudet N, Demange V, Karkut M G 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 19906Google Scholar

    [47]

    Pereiro M, Yudin D, Chico J, Etz C, Eriksson O, Bergman A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 1Google Scholar

    [48]

    Sichuga D, Bellaiche L 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 196102Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kim J H, Lange F F 1999 J. Mater. Res. 14 1626Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang J, Wang Y J, Liu J, Xu J, Wang D, Wang L, Ma X L, Jia C L, Bellaiche L 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 060103Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)—(c)是BTO系统模拟得到的三种偶极子极化构型, 宏观极化分别沿$ \langle111\rangle $, $ \langle110\rangle $, $ \langle100\rangle $方向; (d)计算得到的所有样本中偶极子构型能量和宏观极化方向的关系, 横轴表示不同次计算获得的结果, 纵轴表示每个偶极子的平均能量(meV); (e)说明了图(a)—(c)中箭头颜色表示的偶极子极化方向, 不同颜色的箭头表明偶极子极化方向处于不同的象限. 下节PTO块体的构型也沿用了图(e)表示的颜色方向

    Fig. 1.  (a)–(c) Three types of dipole polarization configurations in BTO simulation, where the macroscopic polarizations are along $ \langle111\rangle $, $ \langle 110 \rangle $, $ \langle100\rangle $, respectively; (d) energy (per dipole) with respect to the calculated configurations obtained from simulations; (e) dipole polarization direction indicating the colors used by the arrows in panels (a)–(c). The colors shown in panel (e) are also used for PTO bulk in the next section

    图 2  PTO宏观极化沿$ \langle 100\rangle $方向的偶极子构型

    Fig. 2.  The dipole configuration of PTO bulk whose the macroscopic polarization is along $ \langle 100\rangle $

    图 3  (a) STO$ _{6} $/PTO$ _{8} $/STO$ _{6} $体系模拟结果, 红色箭头和蓝色箭头分别表示极化沿$ \left[001\right] $正方向和负方向; (b) 图(a)中沿$ \left[100\right] $方向第28层偶极子平面投影图, 即图(a)黑色纵切面, 黄色圆表示涡旋畴结构

    Fig. 3.  (a) Simulation results of STO$ _{6} $/PTO$ _{8} $/STO$ _{6} $ system, where red arrows and blue arrows indicate that the polarization is along the positive and negative directions of $ \left[001\right] $ respectively; (b) projection of dipoles in the 28th $ (100) $ plane along the $ \left[100\right] $ direction (the black arrows in panel (a)). The yellow circles show the vortex domain structures

    图 4  STO5/PTO20/STO5体系模拟结果 (a) STO/PTO/STO偶极子极化构型图, 为使图像更加清晰, 沿$ \left[010\right] $方向每隔四层画一层, 红色箭头和蓝色箭头分别表示极化沿$ \left[001\right] $正方向和负方向; (b)图(a)中沿$ \left[010\right] $方向的第25层偶极子的纵切面投影图; (c)图(b)中黄色区域的放大图, 包括其沿$ \left[010\right] $方向的投影图和三维结构, 该涡旋畴沿$ \left[010\right] $方向呈柱状; (d)位于图(a)中沿$ [010] $方向的第13层偶极子纵切面底部; 在图(a)中, 图(b)—(d)表示结构的所在平面都用黑色箭头标注

    Fig. 4.  Simulation results of STO$ _{5} $/PTO$ _{20} $/ STO$ _{5} $ system: (a) STO/PTO/STO dipole polarization configuration, drawing every 5th layers along the$ \left[010\right] $ direction in order to make the figure clearer; (b) the projected dipole pololarization of the 25th layer along the$ \left[010\right] $ direction; (c) detailed view of the yellow area in panel (b), the vortex domain is cylindrical along the $ \left[010\right] $ direction; (d) the dipole configuration of the 13th layer along the $ [010] $ direction. The planes shown in panels (b)–(d) are marked by black arrows in panel (a)

    图 5  STO/PTO/STO模拟结果 (a) STO/PTO/STO偶极子极化构型示例(和图4(a)是同一个三维图), 沿[001]方向每隔三层画出一层中的偶极子, 同时画出PTO和STO交界层; (b) PTO中间层, 即沿$ \left[001\right] $方向第15层的投影图; (c) PTO底部和STO交界层沿$ \left[001\right] $方向的投影图

    Fig. 5.  (a) Dipole polarization configuration of STO/PTO/STO system, which is the configuration as Fig. 4(a), drawing every 4th layer along the$ \left[001\right] $direction in order to make the figure clearer, the interface layer between PTO and STO is also shown; (b) projection of the middle PTO layer along the $ \left[001\right] $ direction; (c) projection of the bottom interface PTO layer along $[001]$

    表 1  图1(a)(c)所示构型中的近似沿$ \langle 111\rangle $方向的偶极子数目

    Table 1.  The number of unit cell dipoles that are approximately along $ \langle 111\rangle $ direction for the configurations in Figs. 1(a)(c), respectively

    宏观极化方向 $ \left\langle 111\right\rangle $ $ \left\langle 110\right\rangle $ $ \left\langle 100\right\rangle $
    近似沿$ \left\langle 111\right\rangle $方向的偶极子极化个数 1728 1536 1348
    近似沿$ \left\langle 111\right\rangle $方向的偶极子极化占比 100% 89% 78%
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Seidel J, Ramesh R, Scott J, Catalan G 2012 Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 119Google Scholar

    [2]

    Nataf G F, Guennou M, Gregg J M, Meier D, Hlinka J, Salje E K H, Kreisel J 2020 Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 634Google Scholar

    [3]

    Scott J 2016 Ferroelectrics 503 117Google Scholar

    [4]

    谭丛兵, 钟向丽, 王金斌 2020 69 127702Google Scholar

    Tan C B, Zhong X L, Wang J B 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127702Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lu X M, Huang F Z, Zhu J S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tian G, Yang W, Chen D, Fan Z, Hou Z, Alexe M, Gao X 2019 Natl. Sci. Rev. 6 684Google Scholar

    [7]

    Das S, Tang Y L, Hong Z, Gonçalves M A P, McCarter M R, Klewe C, Nguyen K X, Gómez-Ortiz F, Shafer P, Arenholz E, Stoica V A, Hsu S L, Wang B, Ophus C, Liu J F, Nelson C T, Saremi S, Prasad B, Mei A B, Schlom D G, Íñiguez J, García-Fernández P, Muller D A, Chen L Q, Junquera J, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2019 Nature 568 368Google Scholar

    [8]

    Huang J, Tan P, Wang F, Li B 2022 Crystals 12 786Google Scholar

    [9]

    Das S, Ghosh A, McCarter M R, Hsu S L, Tang Y L, Damodaran A R, Ramesh R, Martin L W 2018 APL Mater. 6 100901Google Scholar

    [10]

    Seidel J 2016 Topological Structures in Ferroic Materials, volume 228 of Springer Series in Materials Science (Cham: Springer International Publishing)

    [11]

    Lu L, Nahas Y, Liu M, Du H, Jiang Z, Ren S, Wang D, Jin L, Prokhorenko S, Jia C L, Bellaiche L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 177601Google Scholar

    [12]

    Marton P, Rychetsky I, Hlinka J 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 144125Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhong W, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K M 1995 Phys. Rev. B 52 6301Google Scholar

    [14]

    Chen L Q 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 1835Google Scholar

    [15]

    Liu J, Chen W, Wang B, Zheng Y 2014 Materials 7 6502Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jiang Z, Xu B, Li F, Wang D, Jia C L 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 014105Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wojdeł J C, Íñiguez J 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 247603Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhong W, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 1861Google Scholar

    [19]

    Liu Y, Tang Y L, Zhu Y L, Wang W Y, Ma X L 2016 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3 1600342Google Scholar

    [20]

    Brown W F 1941 Phys. Rev. 60 139Google Scholar

    [21]

    Brown W F 1940 Phys. Rev. 58 736Google Scholar

    [22]

    Aharoni A, et al. 2000 Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism (Vol. 109) (Clarendon Press)

    [23]

    García-Palacios J L, Lázaro F J 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 14937Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kumar D, Adeyeye A O 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 343001Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhu B, Lo C C H, Lee S J, Jiles D C 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 7009Google Scholar

    [26]

    Shen K, Tatara G, Wu M W 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 085203Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li B L, Liu X P, Fang F, Zhu J L, Liu J M 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 014107Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wang D, Liu J, Zhang J, Raza S, Chen X, Jia C L 2019 Comput. Mater. Sci. 162 314Google Scholar

    [29]

    Hong Z, Damodaran A R, Xue F, Hsu S L, Britson J, Yadav A K, Nelson C T, Wang J J, Scott J F, Martin L W, et al. 2017 Nano Lett. 17 2246Google Scholar

    [30]

    Chen L Q, Zhao Y 2022 Prog. Mater. Sci. 124 100868Google Scholar

    [31]

    Petković M, Petković L, Herceg ff 2010 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 233 1755Google Scholar

    [32]

    Sugiura H, Hasegawa T 2019 J. Comput. Appl. Math. 358 136Google Scholar

    [33]

    黄云清, 舒适, 陈艳萍 2009 数值计算方法 (北京: 科学出版社)

    Huang Y Q, Shu S, Chen Y P 2009 Numerical Computation Method (Beijing: Science Press) (in Chinese)

    [34]

    Nishimatsu T, Iwamoto M, Kawazoe Y, Waghmare U V 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 134106Google Scholar

    [35]

    Nishimatsu T, Aoyagi K, Kiguchi T, J Konno T, Kawazoe Y, Funakubo H, Kumar A, V Waghmare U 2012 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 124702Google Scholar

    [36]

    Nishimatsu T, Grünebohm A, Waghmare U V, Kubo M 2016 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 114714Google Scholar

    [37]

    Kwei G H, Lawson A C, Billinge S J L, Cheong S W 1993 J. Phys. Chem. 97 2368Google Scholar

    [38]

    Bersuker I B 1966 Phys. Lett. 20 589Google Scholar

    [39]

    Ravel B, Stern E A, Vedrinskii R I, Kraizman V 1998 Ferroelectrics 206 407Google Scholar

    [40]

    Liu J, Jin L, Jiang Z, Liu L, Himanen L, Wei J, Zhang N, Wang D, Jia C L 2018 J. Chem. Phys. 149 244122Google Scholar

    [41]

    Tinte S, Stachiotti M, Sepliarsky M, Migoni R, Rodriguez C 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 9679Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhang F, Zhang J, Jing H, Li Z, Wang D, Jia C L 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 024106Google Scholar

    [43]

    Tadmor E, Waghmare U, Smith G, Kaxiras E 2002 Acta Mater. 50 2989Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sani A, Hanfland M, Levy D 2002 J. Solid State Chem. 167 446Google Scholar

    [45]

    Abid A Y, Sun Y, Hou X, Tan C, Zhong X, Zhu R, Chen H, Qu K, Li Y, Wu M, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 1Google Scholar

    [46]

    Lemee N, Infante I C, Hubault C, Boulle A, Blanc N, Boudet N, Demange V, Karkut M G 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 19906Google Scholar

    [47]

    Pereiro M, Yudin D, Chico J, Etz C, Eriksson O, Bergman A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 1Google Scholar

    [48]

    Sichuga D, Bellaiche L 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 196102Google Scholar

    [49]

    Kim J H, Lange F F 1999 J. Mater. Res. 14 1626Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang J, Wang Y J, Liu J, Xu J, Wang D, Wang L, Ma X L, Jia C L, Bellaiche L 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 060103Google Scholar

  • [1] 隽珽, 邢家赫, 曾凡聪, 郑鑫, 徐琳. 基于SnO2:DPEPO混合电子传输层的钙钛矿太阳能电池性能研究.  , 2024, 73(19): 198401. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240827
    [2] 田国, 樊贞, 陈德杨, 侯志鹏, 刘俊明, 高兴森. “针尖下的实验室”—扫描探针探测与调控铁电畴及其微观物性.  , 2023, 72(20): 207501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230954
    [3] 李斌, 苗向阳. 单个CsPbBr3钙钛矿量子点的荧光闪烁特性.  , 2021, 70(20): 207802. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210908
    [4] 赵辛未, 吕俊鹏, 倪振华. 铅卤钙钛矿法布里-珀罗谐振腔激光器.  , 2021, 70(5): 054205. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201302
    [5] 郤育莺, 韩悦, 李国辉, 翟爱平, 冀婷, 郝玉英, 崔艳霞. 异质结构在光伏型卤化物钙钛矿光电转换器件中的应用.  , 2020, 69(16): 167804. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200591
    [6] 吴海妍, 唐建新, 李艳青. 基于缺陷态钝化的高效稳定蓝光钙钛矿发光二极管.  , 2020, 69(13): 138502. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200566
    [7] 陈佳楣, 苏杭, 李婉, 张立来, 索鑫磊, 钦敬, 朱坤, 李国龙. 钙钛矿发光二极管光提取性能增强的研究进展.  , 2020, 69(21): 218501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200755
    [8] 樊钦华, 祖延清, 李璐, 代锦飞, 吴朝新. 发光铅卤钙钛矿纳米晶稳定性的研究进展.  , 2020, 69(11): 118501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191767
    [9] 黄伟, 李跃龙, 任慧志, 王鹏阳, 魏长春, 侯国付, 张德坤, 许盛之, 王广才, 赵颖, 袁明鉴, 张晓丹. 基于N型纳米晶硅氧电子注入层的钙钛矿发光二极管.  , 2019, 68(12): 128103. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190258
    [10] 王继飞, 林东旭, 袁永波. 有机金属卤化物钙钛矿中的离子迁移现象及其研究进展.  , 2019, 68(15): 158801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190853
    [11] 魏应强, 徐磊, 彭其明, 王建浦. 钙钛矿的Rashba效应及其对载流子复合的影响.  , 2019, 68(15): 158506. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190675
    [12] 瞿子涵, 储泽马, 张兴旺, 游经碧. 高效绿光钙钛矿发光二极管研究进展.  , 2019, 68(15): 158504. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190647
    [13] 杨自欣, 高章然, 孙晓帆, 蔡宏灵, 张凤鸣, 吴小山. 铅基钙钛矿铁电晶体高临界转变温度的机器学习研究.  , 2019, 68(21): 210502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190942
    [14] 夏俊民, 梁超, 邢贵川. 喷墨打印钙钛矿太阳能电池研究进展与展望.  , 2019, 68(15): 158807. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190302
    [15] 宋蕊, 冯凯, 林上金, 何曼丽, 仝亮. 钙钛矿NaFeF3结构物性的理论研究及应力和掺杂调控.  , 2019, 68(14): 147101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190573
    [16] 赵国栋, 杨亚利, 任伟. 钙钛矿型氧化物非常规铁电研究进展.  , 2018, 67(15): 157504. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180936
    [17] 叶红军, 王大威, 姜志军, 成晟, 魏晓勇. 钙钛矿结构SnTiO3铁电相变的第一性原理研究.  , 2016, 65(23): 237101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.237101
    [18] 杨旭东, 陈汉, 毕恩兵, 韩礼元. 高效率钙钛矿太阳电池发展中的关键问题.  , 2015, 64(3): 038404. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.038404
    [19] 吴迪, 赵纪军, 田华. Fe2+取代对MgSiO3钙钛矿高温高压物性的影响.  , 2013, 62(4): 049101. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.049101
    [20] 向 军, 李莉萍, 苏文辉. 钙钛矿型氧离子导体KNb1-xMgxO3-δ的制备和表征.  , 2003, 52(6): 1474-1478. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1474
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4107
  • PDF下载量:  116
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-10
  • 修回日期:  2022-12-08
  • 上网日期:  2022-12-21
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map