搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

正交像散高密度三维单分子定位显微的数值模拟

林丹樱 武泽凯 于斌 黄黎琳 张潇 屈军乐

引用本文:
Citation:

正交像散高密度三维单分子定位显微的数值模拟

林丹樱, 武泽凯, 于斌, 黄黎琳, 张潇, 屈军乐

Numerical simulation study of three-dimensional high-density single molecule localization microscopy based on orthogonal astigmatism

Lin Dan-Ying, Wu Ze-Kai, Yu Bin, Huang Li-Lin, Zhang Xiao, Qu Jun-Le
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 单分子定位显微(single molecule localization microscopy, SMLM)成像技术利用荧光分子的稀疏发光、探测及定位, 实现了纳米级空间分辨率的超分辨成像. 为了提高其时间分辨率, 需要提高同时发光的荧光分子密度. 但随着分子密度的提高, 不同分子的点扩散函数(point spread function, PSF)在探测器上将发生严重的重叠现象, 导致空间分辨率降低, 尤其是在进行三维SMLM成像时. 为了解决这一问题, 本文提出了一种基于正交像散的高密度三维单分子定位超分辨成像方法, 并对该方法进行分析和数值模拟研究. 该方法的核心是在单分子定位显微镜中将采集的荧光分成两束成像在同一个探测器的两个区域, 并在两个通道中各引入一个光学参数相同但取向相互正交的柱透镜, 实现对同一个荧光分子正负两个像散PSF图像的同时探测, 然后建立该成像过程的线性投影模型, 利用压缩感知算法求解出荧光分子的三维定位信息. 结果表明, 由于两个正交柱透镜产生的一组正交像散PSF对作为一个分子的系统响应时具有较低的相关性, 该方法的高密度三维定位准确性可显著优于采用单个柱透镜的传统像散方法, 且离焦程度越大两个像散PSF的形状差异越大, 这种准确定位的优势就越明显.
    Single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) detects and locates sparsely luminous single fluorescent molecules to achieve super-resolution imaging at nanoscale spatial resolution. In order to improve the temporal resolution, it is necessary to increase the density of the simultaneously emitting molecules. However, with the increase of the density, the point spread function (PSF) of different molecules will overlap severely on the detector, resulting in reduced spatial resolution, especially for three-dimensional (3D) SMLM. To solve this problem, a high density 3D-SMLM imaging method based on orthogonal astigmatism is proposed. Analysis and numerical simulation study for the method are carried out and presented. The main idea of the proposed orthogonal astigmatic method is to split the collected fluorescence in a SMLM microscope into two beams, each of which passes through a separate channel with a cylindrical lens and arrives at a specific region on the same detector. The two cylindrical lenses have the same optical parameters, but their orientations are set to be orthogonal to each other. They are used to obtain both positive and negative astigmatic PSF images of the same fluorescent molecule. Then, a linear projection model of the imaging process is established, and the 3D localization of the fluorescent molecules is realized by using a compression sensing algorithm. The results show that the two orthogonal cylindrical lenses produce a pair of astigmatic PSFs for one single molecule so that different PSF pairs between different molecules have lower mutual correlation, and thus the 3D localization accuracy for high density imaging can be significantly improved as compared with traditional astigmatic method, in which one single cylindrical lens is used. The larger the defocusing degree, the greater the shape difference between the two astigmatic PSFs is, and the more obvious this advantage.
      通信作者: 林丹樱, dylin@szu.edu.cn ; 屈军乐, jlqu@szu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 61775144, 61975131, 61620106016, 62175166)和深圳市基础研究项目(批准号: JCYJ20200109105411133)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Lin Dan-Ying, dylin@szu.edu.cn ; Qu Jun-Le, jlqu@szu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61775144, 61975131, 61620106016, 62175166) and the Basic Research Project of Shenzhen, China (Grant No. JCYJ20200109105411133).
    [1]

    Rust M J, Bates M, Zhuang X W 2006 Nat. Methods 3 793Google Scholar

    [2]

    Bates M, Jones S A, Zhuang X 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. 2013 498Google Scholar

    [3]

    Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X 2008 Science 319 810Google Scholar

    [4]

    Huang B, Jones S A, Brandenburg B, Zhuang X W 2008 Nat. Methods 5 1047Google Scholar

    [5]

    Betzig E, Patterson G H, Sougrat R, Lindwasser O W, Olenych S, Bonifacino J S, Davidson M W, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess H F 2006 Science 313 1642Google Scholar

    [6]

    Holden S J, Uphoff S, Kapanidis A N 2011 Nat. Methods 8 279Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhu L, Zhang W, Elnatan D, Huang B 2012 Nat. Methods 9 721Google Scholar

    [8]

    Babcock H, Sigal Y M, Zhuang X 2012 Opt. Nanoscopy 1 6Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gu L, Sheng Y, Chen Y, Chang H, Zhang Y, Lv P, Ji W, Xu T 2014 Biophys. J. 106 2443Google Scholar

    [10]

    Min J, Holden S J, Carlini L, Unser M, Manley S, Ye J C 2014 Biomedical Optics Express 5 3935Google Scholar

    [11]

    Huang J Q, Sun M Z, Gumpper K, Chi Y J, Ma J J 2015 Biomed. Opt. Express 6 902Google Scholar

    [12]

    Huang J Q, Sun M Z, Ma J J, Chi Y J 2017 IEEE Transa. Comput. Imaging 3 763Google Scholar

    [13]

    Von Middendorff C, Egner A, Geisler C, Hell S, Schonle A 2008 Opt. Express 16 20774Google Scholar

  • 图 1  正交像散单分子定位成像光路和原理示意图 (a)成像光路示意图; (b)正交像散PSF图像对; (c)正交像散校准曲线. OL, 物镜; DM, 二向色镜; EF, 发射滤光片; BS, 分束器; A, 光阑; CL, 柱透镜; L, 透镜; M, 平面镜; EMCCD, 电子倍增电荷耦合器件

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of the optical path and principle of single molecule localization imaging based on orthogonal astigmatism: (a) Optical path; (b) orthogonal astigmatic PSFs; (c) calibration curves. OL, objective lens; DM, dichroic mirror; EF, emission filter; BS, beam splitter; A, aperture; CL, cylindrical lens; L, lens; M, mirror; EMCCD, electron-multiplying charge-coupled device.

    图 2  PSF相关系数 (a)传统像散法; (b)正交像散法

    Fig. 2.  Mutual correlation values between PSFs: (a) Traditional astigmatic method; (b) orthogonal astigmatic method

    图 3  单帧双通道图像及定位结果 (a)单帧双通道图像; (b)正交像散法定位结果; (c)传统像散法定位结果

    Fig. 3.  Single frame image and localization results: (a) Single frame of two-channel image; (b) localization results using orthogonal astigmatic method; (c) localization results using traditional astigmatic method.

    图 4  不同轴向深度分子定位准确性、召回率和错误率比较

    Fig. 4.  Comparison of localization accuracy, recall rate and error rate of molecules with different axial depths.

    图 5  不同密度分子的定位准确性、召回率和错误率比较

    Fig. 5.  Comparison of localization accuracy, recall rate and error rate of molecules with different densities.

    图 6  螺旋线的模拟成像结果 (a)正交像散法; (b)传统像散法

    Fig. 6.  Simulated imaging results of a helix structure: (a) Orthogonal astigmatic method; (b) traditional astigmatic method.

    图 7  平行线的模拟成像结果 (a), (c), (e)正交像散法; (b), (d), (f)传统像散法; (c)—(f)间距最小(50 nm)平行线的放大图; (g)图(c)和(d)的绿色方框区域的强度分布曲线; (h)图(e)和(f)的黄色方框区域的强度分布曲线. 标尺大小: (a), (b) 500 nm; (c)—(f) 200 nm

    Fig. 7.  Simulated imaging results of parallel line structures: (a), (c), (e) Orthogonal astigmatic method; (b), (d), (f) traditional astigmatic method; (c)–(f) zoomed-in view of the minimum spacing (50 nm) lines; (g) cross-sectional profiles of the green boxes in panel (c) and (d); (h) cross-sectional profiles of the yellow boxes in panel (e) and (f). Scale bars: (a), (b) 500 nm; (c)–(f) 200 nm.

    图 8  双通道图像偏差的影响和有无图像偏差及配准的模拟成像结果比较 (a)定位准确性随横向偏移量、旋转角度和缩放倍率的变化; (b)有偏差双通道图像配准后的模拟成像结果; (c)无偏差双通道图像的模拟成像结果. 标尺大小: 500 nm

    Fig. 8.  Influence of deviation between two channel images, and comparison of simulated imaging results with and without image deviation and registration: (a) Localization accuracy versus lateral offset, rotation angle and scaling ratio; (b) simulated image obtained after registration of biased dual channel images; (c) simulated image of unbiased dual channel images. Scale bars: 500 nm.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Rust M J, Bates M, Zhuang X W 2006 Nat. Methods 3 793Google Scholar

    [2]

    Bates M, Jones S A, Zhuang X 2013 Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. 2013 498Google Scholar

    [3]

    Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X 2008 Science 319 810Google Scholar

    [4]

    Huang B, Jones S A, Brandenburg B, Zhuang X W 2008 Nat. Methods 5 1047Google Scholar

    [5]

    Betzig E, Patterson G H, Sougrat R, Lindwasser O W, Olenych S, Bonifacino J S, Davidson M W, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess H F 2006 Science 313 1642Google Scholar

    [6]

    Holden S J, Uphoff S, Kapanidis A N 2011 Nat. Methods 8 279Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhu L, Zhang W, Elnatan D, Huang B 2012 Nat. Methods 9 721Google Scholar

    [8]

    Babcock H, Sigal Y M, Zhuang X 2012 Opt. Nanoscopy 1 6Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gu L, Sheng Y, Chen Y, Chang H, Zhang Y, Lv P, Ji W, Xu T 2014 Biophys. J. 106 2443Google Scholar

    [10]

    Min J, Holden S J, Carlini L, Unser M, Manley S, Ye J C 2014 Biomedical Optics Express 5 3935Google Scholar

    [11]

    Huang J Q, Sun M Z, Gumpper K, Chi Y J, Ma J J 2015 Biomed. Opt. Express 6 902Google Scholar

    [12]

    Huang J Q, Sun M Z, Ma J J, Chi Y J 2017 IEEE Transa. Comput. Imaging 3 763Google Scholar

    [13]

    Von Middendorff C, Egner A, Geisler C, Hell S, Schonle A 2008 Opt. Express 16 20774Google Scholar

  • [1] 马光鹏, 龚振权, 聂梦娇, 曹慧群, 屈军乐, 林丹樱, 于斌. 用于三维单颗粒示踪的多焦面双螺旋点扩散函数显微研究.  , 2024, 73(10): 108701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240271
    [2] 林丹樱, 龚振权, 黄黎琳, 聂梦娇, 于斌, 屈军乐. 用于多通道单分子定位的高精度图像配准方法.  , 2024, 73(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231695
    [3] 田晓俊, 孔繁芳, 经士浩, 郁云杰, 张尧, 张杨, 董振超. 单分子瞬时带电态中电子-振动耦合特性的亚纳米荧光成像研究.  , 2022, 71(6): 063301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212003
    [4] 王月洋, 尹俊豪, 严康, 林钦宁, 庞仁君, 王泽森, 杨涛, 印建平. 基于多能级速率方程的CaH分子三维磁光囚禁模型.  , 2022, 71(16): 163701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220304
    [5] 隋怡晖, 郭星奕, 郁钧瑾, Alexander A. Solovev, 他得安, 许凯亮. 生成对抗网络加速超分辨率超声定位显微成像方法研究.  , 2022, 71(22): 224301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220954
    [6] 杨孟奇, 吴福源, 陈致博, 张翼翔, 陈一, 张晋川, 陈致真, 方志凡, Rafael Ramis, 张杰. 高密度等离子体喷流高速对撞的二维辐射流体模拟研究.  , 2022, 71(22): 225202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220948
    [7] 王琼, 王凯歌, 孟康康, 孙聃, 韩仝雨, 高爱华. 基于单分子成像技术研究λ-DNA分子穿越微米通道端口的电动力学特性.  , 2020, 69(16): 168202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200074
    [8] 千佳, 党诗沛, 周兴, 但旦, 汪召军, 赵天宇, 梁言生, 姚保利, 雷铭. 基于希尔伯特变换的结构光照明快速三维彩色显微成像方法.  , 2020, 69(12): 128701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200352
    [9] 李书磊, 邱实, 石立华, 李云, 段艳涛. 基于正交传播算子的闪电宽带甚高频辐射源定位方法研究.  , 2019, 68(16): 165202. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190522
    [10] 肖晓, 杜舒曼, 赵富, 王晶, 刘军, 李儒新. 基于赝热光照明的单发光学散斑成像.  , 2019, 68(3): 034201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181723
    [11] 李四维, 吴晶晶, 张赛文, 李恒, 陈丹妮, 于斌, 屈军乐. 用于大景深单分子定位显微的多功能全息相位片的设计及数值模拟.  , 2018, 67(17): 174202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180569
    [12] 张宝玲, 宋小勇, 侯氢, 汪俊. 高密度氦相变的分子动力学研究.  , 2015, 64(1): 016202. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.016202
    [13] 黄培培, 刘大刚, 刘腊群, 王辉辉, 夏梦局, 陈颖. 单路脉冲功率真空装置的三维数值模拟研究.  , 2013, 62(19): 192901. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.192901
    [14] 卓青青, 刘红侠, 王志. 三维H形栅SOINMOS器件总剂量条件下的单粒子效应.  , 2013, 62(17): 176106. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.176106
    [15] 陈鹤, 于斌, 陈丹妮, 李恒, 牛憨笨. 超衍射成像中双螺旋点扩展函数的三维定位精度.  , 2013, 62(14): 144201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.144201
    [16] 张科营, 郭红霞, 罗尹虹, 何宝平, 姚志斌, 张凤祁, 王园明. 静态随机存储器单粒子翻转效应三维数值模拟.  , 2009, 58(12): 8651-8656. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8651
    [17] 宋洪胜, 程传福, 张宁玉, 任晓荣, 滕树云, 徐至展. 强散射体产生的像面散斑对比度与随机表面及成像系统关系的研究.  , 2005, 54(2): 669-676. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.669
    [18] 王琛, 王桂英, 徐至展. 全内反射荧光显微术应用于单分子荧光的纵向成像.  , 2004, 53(5): 1325-1330. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1325
    [19] 张航, 何赛灵, 陈攀, 孙威. 层状介质中异质散射源三维定位逆问题的加权傅里叶变换研究.  , 2001, 50(8): 1481-1485. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1481
    [20] 谢涵坤, 周世勋, 孙鑫. 二维电子体系在高密度下的稳定性.  , 1984, 33(9): 1269-1277. doi: 10.7498/aps.33.1269
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4618
  • PDF下载量:  70
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-11
  • 修回日期:  2022-02-22
  • 上网日期:  2022-06-15
  • 刊出日期:  2022-06-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map