-
石墨烯在新基材上的生长一直是被关注的焦点, 而在以金刚石多晶体为基底沉积石墨烯的成核机理方面的研究对石墨烯大规模的制备具有重要的现实意义. 本文采用反应性分子动力学仿真技术, 模拟了镍催化双晶金刚石辅助石墨烯沉积生长的过程, 研究了金刚石晶界对石墨烯成核生长过程中动力学行为的影响. 研究结果表明晶界碳原子可作为补充碳源扩散至镍自由表面, 参与石墨烯的成核生长. 论文探究了温度对碳原子扩散行为的影响, 发现当沉积温度为1700 K时, 利于晶界碳原子在镍晶格中扩散, 有效提高石墨烯成核密度; 探究了沉积碳源流量对石墨烯表面质量影响, 发现1700 K下采用较低的碳沉积速率1 ps–1有利于获得最佳的石墨烯表面质量. 本文的研究结果不仅为金刚石晶界辅助石墨烯沉积生长提供了有效的理论模型和机理解析, 还揭示了沉积温度和沉积碳源流量对生长石墨烯表面质量的影响规律, 为石墨烯/金刚石多晶体异质结构在超精密制造和微电子领域的实际应用提供理论基础.The growth of high-quality graphene is always a focused issue in the field of two-dimensional materials, and the growth of graphene on brand new substrates has received considerable attention from scholars especially. The research on the nucleation mechanism of graphene deposited on a polycrystalline diamond substrate is of significance in the large-scale preparation of graphene in practice. Here in this work, the direct growth without transfer process of graphene on a diamond substrate is used to obtain the high-quality graphene. The reactive molecular dynamics simulation technology is adopted to imitate the process of graphene deposition and growth on bi-crystal diamond assisted by nickel catalyzed at an atomic level. The effect of the bi-crystal diamond grain boundary on the dynamic behavior of graphene nucleation and growth process is studied. The results demonstrate that the grain boundary carbon atoms can be used as a supplementary carbon source to diffuse into the nickel free surface and participate in the nucleation and growth of graphene. Furthermore, the effect of temperature on the diffusion behavior of carbon atoms is explored, finding that high temperature facilitates the dissociation of atoms in the grain boundary. When the deposition temperature equals 1700 K, it is most conducive to the diffusion of grain boundary carbon atoms in the nickel lattice, which effectively enhances the nucleation density of graphene. Besides, the effect of the deposition carbon source flow rate on the surface quality of graphene is explored, finding that the high-quality graphene surface can be obtained by adopting a lower carbon deposit rate of 1 ps–1 at 1700 K. In brief, the research results obtained not only provide an effective theoretical model and analysis of the mechanism for diamond grain boundary assisted graphene deposition and growth, but also reveal the regular pattern of influence of deposition temperature and deposition carbon source flow rate on the surface quality of synthesized graphene. The present study can lay a theoretical foundation for the fabrication and application of new functional graphene-polycrystalline diamond heterostructures in the fields of ultra-precision manufacturing and microelectronics.
-
Keywords:
- graphene /
- diamond grain boundary /
- deposition and growth /
- molecular dynamics
[1] He X, Bai Q, Shen R 2018 Carbon 130 672Google Scholar
[2] Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, Hone J 2008 Science 321 385Google Scholar
[3] Zhu L, Wang J, Zhang T, Ma L, Lim C W, Ding F, Zeng X C 2010 Nano Lett. 10 494Google Scholar
[4] Paolicelli G, Tripathi M, Corradini V, Candini A, Valeri S 2015 Nanotechnology 26 055703Google Scholar
[5] Peng Y, Zeng X, Liu L, Cao X, Zou K, Chen R 2017 Carbon 124 541Google Scholar
[6] Egberts P, Han G H, Liu X Z, Johnson A T C, Carpick R W 2014 ACS Nano 8 5010Google Scholar
[7] Freitag M 2010 Phys. Status Solidi B 247 2895Google Scholar
[8] He L, Wang J, Hou K, Yang S 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 475 389Google Scholar
[9] Lui C H, Liu L, Mak K F, Flynn G W, Heinz T F 2009 Nature 462 339Google Scholar
[10] Zapol P, Sternberg M, Curtiss L A, Frauenheim T, Gruen D M 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 045403Google Scholar
[11] Ueda K, Aichi S, Asano H 2016 Diam. Relat. Mater. 63 148Google Scholar
[12] Berman D, Deshmukh S A, Narayanan B, Sankaranarayanan S K R S, Yan Z, Balandin A A, Zinovev A, Rosenmann D, Sumant A V 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12099Google Scholar
[13] Kanada S, Nagai M, Ito S, Matsumoto T, Ogura M, Takeuchi D, Yamasaki S, Inokuma T, Tokuda N 2017 Diam. Relat. Mater. 75 105Google Scholar
[14] Barnard A S, Sternberg M 2008 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5 2089Google Scholar
[15] Tokuda N, Makino T, Inokuma T, Yamsaki S, Inokuma T 2012 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 090107Google Scholar
[16] Rasuli R, Mostafavi K, Davoodi J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 185503Google Scholar
[17] Syuhada I, Rosikhin A, Fikri A, Noor F A, Winata T 2016 API Conf. Proc. 1710 185503Google Scholar
[18] Xu Z, Yan T, Liu G, Qiao G, Ding F 2015 Nanoscale 8 921Google Scholar
[19] 王浪, 冯伟, 杨连乔, 张建华 2014 63 176801Google Scholar
Wang L, Feng W, Yang L Q, Zhang J H 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 176801Google Scholar
[20] Mueller J E, Van Duin A C T, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard W A 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 9396Google Scholar
[21] L Meng, Q Sun, J Wang, F Ding 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 6097Google Scholar
[22] Neyts E C, Van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2013 Nanoscale 5 7250Google Scholar
[23] Mueller J E, Van Duin A C T, Goddard W A 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 4939Google Scholar
[24] Neyts E C, Van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 17225Google Scholar
[25] Neyts E C, Shibuta Y, van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2010 ACS Nano 4 6665Google Scholar
[26] Van Duin A C T, Strachan A, Stewman S, Zhang Q S, Xu X, Goddard W A 2003 J. Phys. Chem. A 107 3803Google Scholar
[27] Tao C G, Feng H J, Zhou J, Lue L H, Lu X H 2009 Acta Phys-Chim. Sin. 25 1373Google Scholar
[28] Gao J, Yuan Q, Hu H, Zhao J, Ding F 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 16795Google Scholar
[29] Wang L, Zhang X, Chan H L W, Yan F, Ding F 2013 J. AM. Chem. Soc. 135 4476Google Scholar
[30] Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Neizich D, Son H, Bulovic V, Dresselhaus M S, Kong J 2008 Nano Lett. 9 30Google Scholar
[31] Page A J, Ohta Y, Okamoto Y, Irle S, Morokuma K 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 20198Google Scholar
-
-
[1] He X, Bai Q, Shen R 2018 Carbon 130 672Google Scholar
[2] Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, Hone J 2008 Science 321 385Google Scholar
[3] Zhu L, Wang J, Zhang T, Ma L, Lim C W, Ding F, Zeng X C 2010 Nano Lett. 10 494Google Scholar
[4] Paolicelli G, Tripathi M, Corradini V, Candini A, Valeri S 2015 Nanotechnology 26 055703Google Scholar
[5] Peng Y, Zeng X, Liu L, Cao X, Zou K, Chen R 2017 Carbon 124 541Google Scholar
[6] Egberts P, Han G H, Liu X Z, Johnson A T C, Carpick R W 2014 ACS Nano 8 5010Google Scholar
[7] Freitag M 2010 Phys. Status Solidi B 247 2895Google Scholar
[8] He L, Wang J, Hou K, Yang S 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 475 389Google Scholar
[9] Lui C H, Liu L, Mak K F, Flynn G W, Heinz T F 2009 Nature 462 339Google Scholar
[10] Zapol P, Sternberg M, Curtiss L A, Frauenheim T, Gruen D M 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 045403Google Scholar
[11] Ueda K, Aichi S, Asano H 2016 Diam. Relat. Mater. 63 148Google Scholar
[12] Berman D, Deshmukh S A, Narayanan B, Sankaranarayanan S K R S, Yan Z, Balandin A A, Zinovev A, Rosenmann D, Sumant A V 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12099Google Scholar
[13] Kanada S, Nagai M, Ito S, Matsumoto T, Ogura M, Takeuchi D, Yamasaki S, Inokuma T, Tokuda N 2017 Diam. Relat. Mater. 75 105Google Scholar
[14] Barnard A S, Sternberg M 2008 J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 5 2089Google Scholar
[15] Tokuda N, Makino T, Inokuma T, Yamsaki S, Inokuma T 2012 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 090107Google Scholar
[16] Rasuli R, Mostafavi K, Davoodi J 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 185503Google Scholar
[17] Syuhada I, Rosikhin A, Fikri A, Noor F A, Winata T 2016 API Conf. Proc. 1710 185503Google Scholar
[18] Xu Z, Yan T, Liu G, Qiao G, Ding F 2015 Nanoscale 8 921Google Scholar
[19] 王浪, 冯伟, 杨连乔, 张建华 2014 63 176801Google Scholar
Wang L, Feng W, Yang L Q, Zhang J H 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 176801Google Scholar
[20] Mueller J E, Van Duin A C T, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard W A 2001 J. Phys. Chem. A 105 9396Google Scholar
[21] L Meng, Q Sun, J Wang, F Ding 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 6097Google Scholar
[22] Neyts E C, Van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2013 Nanoscale 5 7250Google Scholar
[23] Mueller J E, Van Duin A C T, Goddard W A 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 4939Google Scholar
[24] Neyts E C, Van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 17225Google Scholar
[25] Neyts E C, Shibuta Y, van Duin A C T, Bogaerts A 2010 ACS Nano 4 6665Google Scholar
[26] Van Duin A C T, Strachan A, Stewman S, Zhang Q S, Xu X, Goddard W A 2003 J. Phys. Chem. A 107 3803Google Scholar
[27] Tao C G, Feng H J, Zhou J, Lue L H, Lu X H 2009 Acta Phys-Chim. Sin. 25 1373Google Scholar
[28] Gao J, Yuan Q, Hu H, Zhao J, Ding F 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 16795Google Scholar
[29] Wang L, Zhang X, Chan H L W, Yan F, Ding F 2013 J. AM. Chem. Soc. 135 4476Google Scholar
[30] Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Neizich D, Son H, Bulovic V, Dresselhaus M S, Kong J 2008 Nano Lett. 9 30Google Scholar
[31] Page A J, Ohta Y, Okamoto Y, Irle S, Morokuma K 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 20198Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 4238
- PDF下载量: 85
- 被引次数: 0