超导量子干涉器件

郑东宁

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20202131

摘要

超导现象是一种宏观量子现象. 磁通量子化和约瑟夫森效应是两个最能体现这种宏观量子特性的物理现象. 超导量子干涉器件(superconducting quantum interference device, SQUID)是利用这两个特性而形成的超导器件. SQUID器件在磁信号灵敏探测方面具有广泛的应用. 本文简要介绍低温超导和高温超导SQUID器件的相关背景和发展现状以及应用领域.

关键词:

Superconductivity is a macroscopic quantum phenomenon. Flux quantization and the Josephson effect are two physical phenomena which can best reflect the macroscopic quantum properties. Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) is one type of superconducting devices which uses these two characteristics. SQUID devices are widely used in the sensitive detection of magnetic signals. This paper briefly introduces the background and recent developments of low temperature superconductor and high temperature superconductor SQUID devices.

Keywords:

superconducting devices /
Josephson effect /
superconducting quantum interference device

作者及机构信息

郑东宁^1,2,3

1.
中国科学院物理研究所, 北京凝聚态物理国家研究中心, 北京　100190

2.
中国科学院大学, 物理科学学院, 北京　100049

3.
松山湖材料实验室, 东莞　523808

通信作者: 郑东宁, dzheng@iphy.ac.cn

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划(批准号: 2016YFA0300600, 2017YFA0304300)和中国科学院战略性科技先导专项(批准号: XDB28000000)资助的课题

Authors and contacts

Zheng Dong-Ning^1,2,3

1.
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

2.
School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

3.
Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China

Corresponding author: Zheng Dong-Ning, dzheng@iphy.ac.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFA0300600, 2017YFA0304300) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (Grant No. XDB28000000)

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	London F 1950 Superfluids (New York: Wiley)
[2]	Deaver B S, Fairbank W M 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 43 Google Scholar
[3]	Doll R, Näbauer M 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 51 Google Scholar
[4]	Gough C E, Colclough M S, Forgan E M, Jordan R G, Keene M, Muirhead C M, Rae A I M, Thomas N, Abell J S, Sutton S 1987 Nature 326 855 Google Scholar
[5]	Josephson B D 1962 Phys. Lett. 1 251 Google Scholar
[6]	Anderson P W, Rowell J M 1963 Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 230 Google Scholar
[7]	Clarke J, Braginski A I 2004 The SQUID Handbook (Vol. 1) (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons)
[8]	Clarke J, Braginski A I 2004 The SQUID Handbook (Vol. 2) (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons)
[9]	Fagaly R 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum 77 101101 Google Scholar
[10]	Anders S, Blamire M G, Buchholz F Im, Crété D G, Cristianoe R, Febvref P, Fritzsch L, Herr A, Ilichev E, Kohlmann J, Kunert J, Meyer H G, Niemeyer J, Ortlepp T, Rogalla H, Schurig T, Siegel M, Stolz R,Tarte E, Brake H J M ter, Toepfer H, Villegier J C, Zagoskin A M, Zorin A B 2010 Physica C 470 2079 Google Scholar
[11]	Körber R, Storm J H, Seton H 2016 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29 113001 Google Scholar
[12]	Clarke J, Lee Y H, Schneiderman J 2018 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31 080201 Google Scholar
[13]	Pulizzi F 2011 Nature Materials 10 262 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Y, Dong H, Krause H J, Zhang G F, Xie X M 2020 SQUID Readout Electronics and Magnetometric Systems for Practical Applications (New York: Wiley)
[15]	Jaklevic R C, Lambe J, Silver A H, Mercereau J E 1964 Phys. Rev. Lett. 12 159
[16]	Caputo P, Oppenläder J, Hässler Ch, Tomes J, Friesch A, Träble T, Schopohl N 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1389 Google Scholar
[17]	Drung D 2003 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 1320 Google Scholar
[18]	Dantsker E, Tanaka S, Clarke J 1997 Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 2037 Google Scholar
[19]	Tesche C D, Clarke J 1977 J. Low Temp. Phys. 27 301
[20]	Faley M I, Pratt K, Reineman R, Schurig D, Gott S, Atwood C G, Sarwinski R E, Paulson D N, Starr T N, Fagaly R L 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 083001 Google Scholar
[21]	Gurvitch M, Washington M, Higgins H 1983 Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 472 Google Scholar
[22]	Koelle D, Kleiner R, Ludwig F, Dantsker E, Clarke J 1999 Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 631 Google Scholar
[23]	Tafuri F, Kirtley J R 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 2573 Google Scholar
[24]	Dimos D, Chaudhari P, Mannhart J, LeGoues F K 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 219 Google Scholar
[25]	Du J, Lazar J Y, Lam S K H, Mitchell E E, Foley C P 2014 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27 095005 Google Scholar
[26]	Wakana H, Adachi S, Kamitani A, Nakayama K, Ishimaru Y, Tarutani Y, Tanabe K 2005 IEICE Trans. Electron. E88-C 208 Google Scholar
[27]	Bergeal N, Lesueur J, Faini G, Aprili M, Contour J 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 112515 Google Scholar
[28]	Trabaldo E, Ruffieux S, Andersson E, Arpaia R, Montemurro D, Schneiderman J F, Kalaboukhov A, Winkler D, Lombardi F, Bauch T 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 132601 Google Scholar
[29]	Cybart S A, Cho E, Wong T, Wehlin B H, Ma M K, Huynh C, Dynes R 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 598 Google Scholar
[30]	Cho E Y, Li H, LeFebvre J C, Zhou Y W, Dynes R, Cybart S A 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 162602 Google Scholar
[31]	Hari R, Salmelin R 2012 NeuroImage 61 386 Google Scholar
[32]	Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R J, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa O V 1993 Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 413
[33]	Mäkelä J P, Forss N, Jääskeläinen J, Kirveskari E, Korvenoja A, Paetau R 2006 Neurosurgery 59 493 Google Scholar
[34]	Lee Y H, Kwon H, Yu K K, Kim J M, Lee S K, Kim M Y, Kim K 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 084003 Google Scholar
[35]	Öisjöen F, Schneiderman J F, Figueras G A, Chukharkin M L, Kalabukhov A, Hedström A, Elam M, Winkler D 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 132601 Google Scholar
[36]	Sander T H, Preusser J, Mhaskar R, Kitching J, Trahms L, Knappe S 2012 Opt. Express 3 981 Google Scholar
[37]	Boto E, Holmes N, Leggett J, Roberts G, Shah V, Meyer S S, Muñoz L D, Mullinger K J, Tierney T M, Bestmann S, Barnes G R, Bowtell R, Brookes M J 2018 Nature 555 657 Google Scholar
[38]	Inaba T, Nakazawa Y, Yoshida K, Kato Y, Hattori A, Kimura T, Hoshi T, Ishizu T, Seo Y, Sato A, Sekiguchi Y, Nogami A, Watanabe S, Horigome H, Kawakami Y, Aonuma K 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 114003 Google Scholar
[39]	Enpuku K, Tsujita Y, Nakamura K, Sasayama T, Yoshida T 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 053002 Google Scholar
[40]	Yang S Y, Chieh J J, Yang C C, Liao S H, Chen H H, Horng H E, Yang H C, Hong C Y, Chiu M J, Chen T F, Huang K W, Wu C C 2013 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23 1600604 Google Scholar
[41]	Clarke J, Hatridge M, Möβle M 2007 Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 389 Google Scholar
[42]	Dong H, Hwang S M, Wendland M, You L, Clarke J, Inglis B 2017 Magn. Reson. Med. 78 2342 Google Scholar
[43]	Buckenmaier K, Pedersen A, SanGiorgio P, Scheffler K, Clarke J, Inglis B 2019 Neuroimage. 186 185 Google Scholar
[44]	Busch S E, Hatridge M, Mößle M, Myers W, Wong T, Mück M, Chew K, Kuchinsky K, Simko J, Clarke J 2012 Magn. Reson. Med. 67 1138 Google Scholar
[45]	Magnelind P E, Gomez J J, Matlashov A N, Owens T, Sandin J H, Volegov P L, Espy M A 2011 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21 456 Google Scholar
[46]	Leslie K E, Binks R A, Lam S K H, Sullivan P A, Tilbrook D L, Thorn R G, Foley C P 2008 Leading Edge 27 70 Google Scholar
[47]	Hato T, Tsukamoto A, Adachi S, Oshikubo Y, Watanabe H, Ishikawa H, Sugisaki M, Arai E, Tanabe K 2013 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 115003 Google Scholar
[48]	Chwala A, Stolz R, Schmelz M, Zakosarenko V, Meyer M, Meyer H G 2015 IEICE Trans. Electron. E98.C 167 Google Scholar
[49]	Supracon A Ghttp://www.supracon.de/
[50]	Song Z, Dai H, Rong L, et al. 2019 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29 1600205
[51]	Rong L, Bao S, Wu J, et al. 2019 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29 1601704
[52]	Stolz R, Zakosarenko V, Schulz M, Chwala A, Fritzsch L, Meyer H G, Kötlin E O 2006 Leading Edge 25 178 Google Scholar
[53]	Halperin W P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 467 Google Scholar
[54]	Yang C, Si M T, You L X 2020 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63 180502 Google Scholar
[55]	Irwin K D, Cho H M, Doriese W B, Fowler J W, Hilton G C, Niemack M D, Reintsema C D, Schmidt D R, Ullom J N, Vale L R 2012 J. Low Temp. Phys. 167 588 Google Scholar
[56]	Sloan J V, Hotz M, Boutan C, et al. 2016 Phys. Dark Universe 14 95 Google Scholar
[57]	Asztalos S J, Carosi G, Hagmann C, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 041301 Google Scholar
[58]	Tsuei C C, Kirtley J R 2000 Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 969 Google Scholar
[59]	Embon L, Anahory Y, Jelić Ž L, Lachman E O, Myasoedov Y, Huber M E, Mikitik G P, Silhanek A V, Milošević M V, Gurevich A, Zeldov E 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 85 Google Scholar
[60]	Halbertal D, Cuppens J, M. Ben Shalom Shalom M. B, Embon L, Shadmi N, Anahory Y, Naren H R, Sarkar J, Uri A, Ronen Y, Myasoedov Y, Levitov L S, Joselevich E, Geim A K, Zeldov E 2016 Nature 539 407 Google Scholar
[61]	Hatsukade Y, Inaba T, Maruno Y, Tanaka S 2005 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 723 Google Scholar
[62]	Krause H J, Michael M M, Tanaka S 2015 SQUlDs in Nondestructive Evaluation. In Applied Superconductivity: Handbook on Devices and Applications (Vol. 2) (Weinheim: Wiley)
[63]	Faley M, Kostyurina E, Kalashnikov K, Maslennikov Y, Koshelets V, Dunin-Borkowski R 2017 Sensors 17 2798 Google Scholar
[64]	Clarke J, Wilhelm F K 2008 Nature 453 1031 Google Scholar
[65]	Krantz J P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F, Orlando T P, Gustavsson S, Oliver W D 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6 021318 Google Scholar
[66]	Kwon S, Tomonaga A, Gopika L B, Devitt S J, Tsai J S 2020 arXiv:2009.08021 [quant-ph]
[67]	Kjaergaard M, Schwartz M E, Braumuller J, Krantz P, Wang J I J, Gustavsson S, Oliver W D 2020 Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11 369 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 DC-SQUID示意图^[7]

Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the DC-SQUID configuration^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同屏蔽参数β_L对应的磁通对DC-SQUID器件临界电流调制的情况^[7]

Fig. 2. Critical current of the DC-SQUID vs. applied flux for 3 values of the screening parameter β_L. Junction parameters are assumed to be identical^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 DC-SQUID　(a)等效电路示意图; (b)磁通分别为整数个和半整数个Φ₀时的I-V曲线; (c)电压-磁通曲线^[7]

Fig. 3. The DC-SQUID: (a) Schematic electric circuit; (b) current-voltage characteristics at integer and half-integer values of applied flux; the operation point is set by the bias current I_b; (c) voltage vs. flux Φ_a/Φ₀ for constant bias current^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 DC-SQUID的直接读出FLL读出电路(左)和磁通调制的FFL读出电路(右)^[17]

Fig. 4. DC-SQUID readout FLL circuit. Basic FLL circuit with direct readout (left) and with flux modulation (right)^[17].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 RF-SQUID和用于读出的谐振电路以及前置放大器的等效电路示意图^[7]

Fig. 5. Schematic representation of the RF-SQUID, with tank circuit and preamplifier^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 几种常见的高温超导约瑟夫森结　(a)双晶结; (b)台阶结; (c)台阶SNS结; (d)斜边结^[22]

Fig. 6. Schematic drawing of four types of HTS Josephson junctions used in SQUIDs: (a)^[21]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 MgO衬底上45°台阶上生长的YBCO薄膜的扫描电镜(SEM)图像(左图)和高分辨透射电镜HRTEM图像(中图). 右图: 一个16 mm大小、采用台阶结的高温超导DC-SQUID磁强计在超导屏蔽环境下测量的噪声谱^[20]

Fig. 7. SEM image (left) and HRTEM image (middle) of an YBCO film deposited on a double-layer-buffered 45° step on an MgO substrate. A 45° [100]-tilted GB is clearly shown. Right: Noise spectral density of a 16 mm high-Tc DC-SQUID magnetometer with step-edge junctions measured in a superconducting shield^[20].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 (a)一个方形线圈DC-SQUID器件的显微镜照片, 上有15圈输入线圈(即磁通变换器); (b) 狭缝左侧末端的放大图. 从图中可以看见结区和并联电阻^[7]

Fig. 8. (a) Square-washer DC-SQUID with overlaid 15-turn input coil; (b) expanded view of the left-hand end of the slit showing the junction on each side of the slit, and the resistive shunts^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 左图: 利用MEG信号进行双稳视觉感知研究. 右图: 一个SQUID脑磁测量系统^[11]

Fig. 9. Left: MEG study of bistable visual perception using a frequency-tagged stimulus; Right:A SQUID MEG system^[11].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 (a) 在MEG-MRI集成实验系统上测量的以及(b)同样刺激在最先进的MEG系统上得到的视觉诱发反应产生的等效偶极和磁场分布; (c)用另一个MEG-MRI集成实验系统在96 μT磁场下得到的超低磁场MRI切片图和记录的听觉反应脑磁信号对应的偶极子; (d)常规3 T磁场下同一个样本的切片图^[11]

Fig. 10. Equivalent dipoles and field patterns of the visually evoked responses using (a) the MEG–MRI system and (b) state-of-the-art MEG with the same stimulus protocol. MRI slices (c) at 96 μT, with the registered equivalent dipole of the auditory response overlaid, and (d) from an uncoregistered 3 T image acquired separately from the same subject^[11].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 超导瞬变电磁探矿系统(左图), 与野外探测结果(右图)

Fig. 11. SQUID TEM system (left) and field detection results (right).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 左图: 针尖Nano-SQUID探测Pb薄膜的磁通的示意图; 右图: 测量的Pb薄膜中静态和运动状态磁通线的图像^[60]

Fig. 12. Left: Pb thin film sample and the experimental set-up; Right: Magnetic imaging of stationary and fast moving vortices in Pb film at 4.2 K^[60].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

map

[1]	London F 1950 Superfluids (New York: Wiley)
[2]	Deaver B S, Fairbank W M 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 43 Google Scholar
[3]	Doll R, Näbauer M 1961 Phys. Rev. Lett. 7 51 Google Scholar
[4]	Gough C E, Colclough M S, Forgan E M, Jordan R G, Keene M, Muirhead C M, Rae A I M, Thomas N, Abell J S, Sutton S 1987 Nature 326 855 Google Scholar
[5]	Josephson B D 1962 Phys. Lett. 1 251 Google Scholar
[6]	Anderson P W, Rowell J M 1963 Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 230 Google Scholar
[7]	Clarke J, Braginski A I 2004 The SQUID Handbook (Vol. 1) (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons)
[8]	Clarke J, Braginski A I 2004 The SQUID Handbook (Vol. 2) (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons)
[9]	Fagaly R 2006 Rev. Sci. Instrum 77 101101 Google Scholar
[10]	Anders S, Blamire M G, Buchholz F Im, Crété D G, Cristianoe R, Febvref P, Fritzsch L, Herr A, Ilichev E, Kohlmann J, Kunert J, Meyer H G, Niemeyer J, Ortlepp T, Rogalla H, Schurig T, Siegel M, Stolz R,Tarte E, Brake H J M ter, Toepfer H, Villegier J C, Zagoskin A M, Zorin A B 2010 Physica C 470 2079 Google Scholar
[11]	Körber R, Storm J H, Seton H 2016 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 29 113001 Google Scholar
[12]	Clarke J, Lee Y H, Schneiderman J 2018 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31 080201 Google Scholar
[13]	Pulizzi F 2011 Nature Materials 10 262 Google Scholar
[14]	Zhang Y, Dong H, Krause H J, Zhang G F, Xie X M 2020 SQUID Readout Electronics and Magnetometric Systems for Practical Applications (New York: Wiley)
[15]	Jaklevic R C, Lambe J, Silver A H, Mercereau J E 1964 Phys. Rev. Lett. 12 159
[16]	Caputo P, Oppenläder J, Hässler Ch, Tomes J, Friesch A, Träble T, Schopohl N 2004 Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 1389 Google Scholar
[17]	Drung D 2003 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 1320 Google Scholar
[18]	Dantsker E, Tanaka S, Clarke J 1997 Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 2037 Google Scholar
[19]	Tesche C D, Clarke J 1977 J. Low Temp. Phys. 27 301
[20]	Faley M I, Pratt K, Reineman R, Schurig D, Gott S, Atwood C G, Sarwinski R E, Paulson D N, Starr T N, Fagaly R L 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 083001 Google Scholar
[21]	Gurvitch M, Washington M, Higgins H 1983 Appl. Phys. Lett. 42 472 Google Scholar
[22]	Koelle D, Kleiner R, Ludwig F, Dantsker E, Clarke J 1999 Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 631 Google Scholar
[23]	Tafuri F, Kirtley J R 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 2573 Google Scholar
[24]	Dimos D, Chaudhari P, Mannhart J, LeGoues F K 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 219 Google Scholar
[25]	Du J, Lazar J Y, Lam S K H, Mitchell E E, Foley C P 2014 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27 095005 Google Scholar
[26]	Wakana H, Adachi S, Kamitani A, Nakayama K, Ishimaru Y, Tarutani Y, Tanabe K 2005 IEICE Trans. Electron. E88-C 208 Google Scholar
[27]	Bergeal N, Lesueur J, Faini G, Aprili M, Contour J 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 112515 Google Scholar
[28]	Trabaldo E, Ruffieux S, Andersson E, Arpaia R, Montemurro D, Schneiderman J F, Kalaboukhov A, Winkler D, Lombardi F, Bauch T 2020 Appl. Phys. Lett. 116 132601 Google Scholar
[29]	Cybart S A, Cho E, Wong T, Wehlin B H, Ma M K, Huynh C, Dynes R 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 598 Google Scholar
[30]	Cho E Y, Li H, LeFebvre J C, Zhou Y W, Dynes R, Cybart S A 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 162602 Google Scholar
[31]	Hari R, Salmelin R 2012 NeuroImage 61 386 Google Scholar
[32]	Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R J, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa O V 1993 Rev. Mod. Phys. 65 413
[33]	Mäkelä J P, Forss N, Jääskeläinen J, Kirveskari E, Korvenoja A, Paetau R 2006 Neurosurgery 59 493 Google Scholar
[34]	Lee Y H, Kwon H, Yu K K, Kim J M, Lee S K, Kim M Y, Kim K 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 084003 Google Scholar
[35]	Öisjöen F, Schneiderman J F, Figueras G A, Chukharkin M L, Kalabukhov A, Hedström A, Elam M, Winkler D 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 132601 Google Scholar
[36]	Sander T H, Preusser J, Mhaskar R, Kitching J, Trahms L, Knappe S 2012 Opt. Express 3 981 Google Scholar
[37]	Boto E, Holmes N, Leggett J, Roberts G, Shah V, Meyer S S, Muñoz L D, Mullinger K J, Tierney T M, Bestmann S, Barnes G R, Bowtell R, Brookes M J 2018 Nature 555 657 Google Scholar
[38]	Inaba T, Nakazawa Y, Yoshida K, Kato Y, Hattori A, Kimura T, Hoshi T, Ishizu T, Seo Y, Sato A, Sekiguchi Y, Nogami A, Watanabe S, Horigome H, Kawakami Y, Aonuma K 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 114003 Google Scholar
[39]	Enpuku K, Tsujita Y, Nakamura K, Sasayama T, Yoshida T 2017 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30 053002 Google Scholar
[40]	Yang S Y, Chieh J J, Yang C C, Liao S H, Chen H H, Horng H E, Yang H C, Hong C Y, Chiu M J, Chen T F, Huang K W, Wu C C 2013 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23 1600604 Google Scholar
[41]	Clarke J, Hatridge M, Möβle M 2007 Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9 389 Google Scholar
[42]	Dong H, Hwang S M, Wendland M, You L, Clarke J, Inglis B 2017 Magn. Reson. Med. 78 2342 Google Scholar
[43]	Buckenmaier K, Pedersen A, SanGiorgio P, Scheffler K, Clarke J, Inglis B 2019 Neuroimage. 186 185 Google Scholar
[44]	Busch S E, Hatridge M, Mößle M, Myers W, Wong T, Mück M, Chew K, Kuchinsky K, Simko J, Clarke J 2012 Magn. Reson. Med. 67 1138 Google Scholar
[45]	Magnelind P E, Gomez J J, Matlashov A N, Owens T, Sandin J H, Volegov P L, Espy M A 2011 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21 456 Google Scholar
[46]	Leslie K E, Binks R A, Lam S K H, Sullivan P A, Tilbrook D L, Thorn R G, Foley C P 2008 Leading Edge 27 70 Google Scholar
[47]	Hato T, Tsukamoto A, Adachi S, Oshikubo Y, Watanabe H, Ishikawa H, Sugisaki M, Arai E, Tanabe K 2013 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 115003 Google Scholar
[48]	Chwala A, Stolz R, Schmelz M, Zakosarenko V, Meyer M, Meyer H G 2015 IEICE Trans. Electron. E98.C 167 Google Scholar
[49]	Supracon A Ghttp://www.supracon.de/
[50]	Song Z, Dai H, Rong L, et al. 2019 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29 1600205
[51]	Rong L, Bao S, Wu J, et al. 2019 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 29 1601704
[52]	Stolz R, Zakosarenko V, Schulz M, Chwala A, Fritzsch L, Meyer H G, Kötlin E O 2006 Leading Edge 25 178 Google Scholar
[53]	Halperin W P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 467 Google Scholar
[54]	Yang C, Si M T, You L X 2020 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 63 180502 Google Scholar
[55]	Irwin K D, Cho H M, Doriese W B, Fowler J W, Hilton G C, Niemack M D, Reintsema C D, Schmidt D R, Ullom J N, Vale L R 2012 J. Low Temp. Phys. 167 588 Google Scholar
[56]	Sloan J V, Hotz M, Boutan C, et al. 2016 Phys. Dark Universe 14 95 Google Scholar
[57]	Asztalos S J, Carosi G, Hagmann C, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 041301 Google Scholar
[58]	Tsuei C C, Kirtley J R 2000 Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 969 Google Scholar
[59]	Embon L, Anahory Y, Jelić Ž L, Lachman E O, Myasoedov Y, Huber M E, Mikitik G P, Silhanek A V, Milošević M V, Gurevich A, Zeldov E 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 85 Google Scholar
[60]	Halbertal D, Cuppens J, M. Ben Shalom Shalom M. B, Embon L, Shadmi N, Anahory Y, Naren H R, Sarkar J, Uri A, Ronen Y, Myasoedov Y, Levitov L S, Joselevich E, Geim A K, Zeldov E 2016 Nature 539 407 Google Scholar
[61]	Hatsukade Y, Inaba T, Maruno Y, Tanaka S 2005 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15 723 Google Scholar
[62]	Krause H J, Michael M M, Tanaka S 2015 SQUlDs in Nondestructive Evaluation. In Applied Superconductivity: Handbook on Devices and Applications (Vol. 2) (Weinheim: Wiley)
[63]	Faley M, Kostyurina E, Kalashnikov K, Maslennikov Y, Koshelets V, Dunin-Borkowski R 2017 Sensors 17 2798 Google Scholar
[64]	Clarke J, Wilhelm F K 2008 Nature 453 1031 Google Scholar
[65]	Krantz J P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F, Orlando T P, Gustavsson S, Oliver W D 2019 Appl. Phys. Rev. 6 021318 Google Scholar
[66]	Kwon S, Tomonaga A, Gopika L B, Devitt S J, Tsai J S 2020 arXiv:2009.08021 [quant-ph]
[67]	Kjaergaard M, Schwartz M E, Braumuller J, Krantz P, Wang J I J, Gustavsson S, Oliver W D 2020 Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11 369 Google Scholar

[1]	刘怀远, 肖建飞, 吕昭征, 吕力, 屈凡明. Bi₂O₂Se纳米线的生长及其超导量子干涉器件. , 2024, 73(4): 047803. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231600
[2]	徐磊, 李沛岭, 吕昭征, 沈洁, 屈凡明, 刘广同, 吕力. 马约拉纳零能模的输运探测. , 2023, 72(17): 177401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230951
[3]	初纯光, 王安琦, 廖志敏. 拓扑半金属-超导体异质结的约瑟夫森效应. , 2023, 72(8): 087401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230397
[4]	宿非凡, 杨钊华, 赵寿宽, 严海生, 田野, 赵士平. 铌基超导量子比特及辅助器件的制备. , 2022, 71(5): 050303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211865
[5]	宿非凡, 杨钊华, 赵寿宽, 严海生, 田野, 赵士平. 铌基超导量子比特及辅助器件的制备. , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211865
[6]	韩金舸, 欧阳鹏辉, 李恩平, 王轶文, 韦联福. 超导约瑟夫森结物理参数的实验推算. , 2021, 70(17): 170304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210393
[7]	梁恬恬, 张国峰, 伍文涛, 倪志, 王永良, 应利良, 伍俊, 荣亮亮, 彭炜, 高波. 串联超导量子干涉器件阵列制备与测试分析. , 2021, 70(17): 178501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210467
[8]	韩昊轩, 张国峰, 张雪, 梁恬恬, 应利良, 王永良, 彭炜, 王镇. 低噪声超导量子干涉器件磁强计设计与制备. , 2019, 68(13): 138501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190483
[9]	王松, 王星云, 周章渝, 杨发顺, 杨健, 傅兴华. 硼膜制备工艺、微观结构及其在硼化镁超导约瑟夫森结中的应用. , 2016, 65(1): 017401. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.017401
[10]	张永升, 邱阳, 张朝祥, 李华, 张树林, 王永良, 徐小峰, 丁红胜, 孔祥燕. 多通道心磁系统标定方法研究. , 2014, 63(22): 228501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.228501
[11]	刘明, 徐小峰, 王永良, 曾佳, 李华, 邱阳, 张树林, 张国峰, 孔祥燕, 谢晓明. 超导量子干涉器件读出电路中匹配变压器的传输特性研究. , 2013, 62(18): 188501. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.188501
[12]	金霞, 董正超, 梁志鹏, 仲崇贵. 磁性d波超导/铁磁/磁性d波超导结中的约瑟夫森效应. , 2013, 62(4): 047401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.047401
[13]	张树林, 刘扬波, 曾佳, 王永良, 孔祥燕, 谢晓明. 基于低温超导量子干涉器件的脑听觉激励磁场探测. , 2012, 61(2): 020701. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.020701
[14]	岳宏卫, 阎少林, 周铁戈, 谢清连, 游峰, 王争, 何明, 赵新杰, 方兰, 杨扬, 王福音, 陶薇薇. 嵌入Fabry-Perot谐振腔的高温超导双晶约瑟夫森结的毫米波辐照特性研究. , 2010, 59(2): 1282-1287. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1282
[15]	岳宏卫, 王争, 樊彬, 宋凤斌, 游峰, 赵新杰, 何明, 方兰, 阎少林. 高温超导双晶约瑟夫森结阵列毫米波相干辐射. , 2010, 59(8): 5755-5758. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5755
[16]	李绍, 任育峰, 王宁, 田野, 储海峰, 黎松林, 陈莺飞, 李洁, 陈赓华, 郑东宁. 利用高温超导直流量子干涉器件进行10-6 T量级磁场下核磁共振的研究. , 2009, 58(8): 5744-5749. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5744
[17]	尤育新, 赵志刚, 王进, 刘楣. 高温超导体中约瑟夫森涡旋流阻的振荡效应. , 2008, 57(11): 7252-7256. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7252
[18]	郎佩琳, 陈　珂, 郑东宁, 张鸣剑, 漆汉宏, 赵忠贤. 高阶高温超导量子干涉器件平面式梯度计的设计. , 2004, 53(10): 3530-3534. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3530
[19]	杜胜望, 戴远东, 王世光. 用射频超导量子干涉器件测量高温超导体序参量的位相. , 1999, 48(12): 2364-2368. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.2364
[20]	刘福绥. 超导桥约瑟夫森效应的微观理论. , 1977, 26(5): 411-416. doi: 10.7498/aps.26.411

计量

文章访问数: 22052
PDF下载量: 1771
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

超导量子干涉器件