搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

矩形纳米狭缝超表面结构的近场增强聚焦调控

李鑫 吴立祥 杨元杰

引用本文:
Citation:

矩形纳米狭缝超表面结构的近场增强聚焦调控

李鑫, 吴立祥, 杨元杰

Enhanced near field focus steering of rectangular nanoslit metasurface structure

Li Xin, Wu Li-Xiang, Yang Yuan-Jie
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 为了实现对入射光的近场亚波长增强聚焦, 设计了一种由内部矩形纳米狭缝圆环阵列和外部多圆环狭缝构成的超表面结构, 得到了该结构激发的表面等离激元电场表达式, 并从物理机理上解释了该结构中心聚焦及增强聚焦的原理. 利用时域有限差分方法仿真研究了该超表面结构在不同偏振态入射光下的激发场聚焦特性. 根据理论推导与仿真结果可得, 该结构在波长为980 nm的圆偏振光入射下于近场的金属表面结构中心处生成半高宽为650 nm左右的亚波长聚焦光斑, 其场分布为近似的第一类贝塞尔函数. 与单一的矩形纳米狭缝圆环阵列结构相比, 带有外部多圆环狭缝的复合结构具有更好的增强聚焦效果, 使得中心焦斑强度提升了一倍, 且更有利于对激发场进行调控. 除此之外, 还讨论了任意偏振方向的线偏振光入射结构激发的电场, 得到了电场的解析表达式, 即入射光偏振角的正弦函数包络乘上第一类贝塞尔函数. 本文的研究对基于超表面结构的亚波长光调控有一定的指导意义, 在光镊、亚波长尺度光信息传输与处理等领域也有一定的应用价值.
    Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are electromagnetic excitations propagating along the metal-dielectric interface. The SPPs excited by the metal micro/nano structures have the ability to manipulate the light on a subwavelength scale. The SPPs are of interest to researchers for its excellent subwavelength field confinement and local field enhancement. So far, the SPPs have found numerous applications in optical tweezers, biological sensors, and near-field holographic imaging, due to its subwavelength focusing. In order to achieve enhanced near field subwavelength focusing, we propose a metasurface structure in this paper, which is composed of rectangular nanoslit circular arrays and multilayer annular slits. The function of the inner ring arrays is to excite SPPs and the outer ring slits is to enhance focusing. The electric field expression of SPP is studied analytically and theoretically, and then the principle of rectangular nanoslit to excite SPP and the inner ring array structure to generate central focusing are explained. The parameters of the structure are optimized, and the focusing characteristics of the metasurface structure under different polarization light are studied by using the finite difference time domain method. Furthermore, we explain the principle of the external structure enhancing focusing by introducing the theory of Fresnel zone plate and depth modulation. The analytical expressions and simulations show that when the incident polarized light has a wavelength of 980 nm, the focal spot having a full width at half maximum of about 650 nm, and the distribution of the coupled field can be approximately expressed by the first kind Bessel function. Compared with the former single circular array structure, the composite structure proposed in this paper has a good effect of both enhancing the central focusing and inhibiting the outer field divergence, and the center focal spot intensity is doubled. In addition, the electric field excited by the arbitrary linearly polarized light is also discussed, the electric field satisfies the form of the polarization angle sinusoidal function multiplied by a Bessel function. The research results of our study have some applications in subwavelength light modulation, near-field imaging, optical tweezers, and subwavelength scale optical information processing and so on.
      通信作者: 杨元杰, dr.yang2003@uestc.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11874102, 11474048)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Yang Yuan-Jie, dr.yang2003@uestc.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11874102, 11474048)
    [1]

    Barnes W L, Dereux A, Ebbesen T W 2003 Nature 424 824Google Scholar

    [2]

    Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Science 308 534Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lieven V, Catrysse P B, Yu Z F, Fan S H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 033902Google Scholar

    [4]

    Yin L, Vlasko-Vlasov V K, Pearson J, Hiller J M, Hua J, Welp U, Brown D E, Kimball C W 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1399Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shen Z, Hu Z J, Yuan G H, Min C J, Fang H, Yuan X C 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4627Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wang J J, Duan G T, Liu G Q, Yue L, Chen Z X, Lei X, Cai W P 2016 J. Hazard. Mater. 303 94Google Scholar

    [7]

    Coluccio M L, Francardi M, Gentile F, Candeloro P, Ferrara L, Perozziello G, Fabrizio E D 2014 Sensors 14 6056

    [8]

    Song W T, Fang Z Y, Huang S, Lin F, Zhu X 2010 Opt. Express 18 14762Google Scholar

    [9]

    Holmgaard T, Gosciniak J, Bozhevolnyi S I 2010 Opt. Express 18 23009Google Scholar

    [10]

    Raghunathan S B, Gan C H, Dijk T V, Kim B E, Schouten H F, Ubachs W, Lalanne P, Visser T D 2012 Opt. Express 20 15326Google Scholar

    [11]

    Song E Y, Lee Y L, Hong J, Lee K, Lee Y, Lee G Y, Kim H, Lee B 2016 Laser Photon. Rev. 10 299

    [12]

    López-Tejeira F, Rodrigo S G, Martín-Moreno L, García-Vidal F J, Devaux E, Ebbesen T W, Krenn J R, Radko I P, Bozhevolnyi S I, González M U 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 324Google Scholar

    [13]

    Radko I P, Bozhevolnyi S I, Brucoli G, Martín-Moreno L, García-Vidal F J, Boltasseva A 2009 Opt. Express 17 7228Google Scholar

    [14]

    Li X W, Huang L L, Tan Q F, Bai B F, Jin G F 2011 Opt. Express 19 6541Google Scholar

    [15]

    Li L, Li T, Wang S, Zhu S, Zhang X 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4357Google Scholar

    [16]

    Tanemura T, Balram K C, Dany-Sebastien L G, Pierre W, White J S, Brongersma M L, Miller D A B 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2693Google Scholar

    [17]

    Lee S Y, Kim K, Lee G Y, Lee B 2015 Opt. Express 23 15598Google Scholar

    [18]

    Lee B, Park H, Kim K Y, Kim K, Lee S Y, Kim S J 2015 Optica 2 6Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wintz D, Genevet P, Ambrosio A, Woolf A, Capasso F 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3585Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kim H, Park J, Cho S W, Lee S Y, Kang M, Lee B 2010 Nano Lett. 10 529Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y J, Thirunavukkarasu G, Babiker M, Yuan J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 094802Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu J L, Gao Y, Ran L L, Guo K, Lu Z W, Liu S T 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 013116Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen C F, Ku C T, Tai Y H, Wei P K, Lin H N, Huang C B 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2746Google Scholar

    [24]

    Rui G H, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q W 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 2237Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhou H L, Dong J J, Zhou Y F, Zhang J H, Liu M, Zhang X L 2015 IEEE Photonics J. 7 1

    [26]

    Ren H R, Li X P, Zhang Q M, Gu M 2016 Science 352 805Google Scholar

    [27]

    Garoli D, Ongarello T, Zilio P, Carli M, Romanato F 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 1161Google Scholar

    [28]

    Garoli D, Romanato F, Carli M, Zilio P, Giorgis V 2014 Opt. Express 22 26302Google Scholar

    [29]

    Hu C B, Xu J, Ding J 2017 J. Mod. Opt. 64 1Google Scholar

    [30]

    王帅, 邓子岚, 王发强, 王晓雷, 李向平 2019 68 077801Google Scholar

    Wang S, Deng Z L, Wang F Q, Wang X L, Li X P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 077801Google Scholar

    [31]

    Lin J, Mueller J P B, Wang Q, Yuan G H, Antoniou N, Yuan X C, Capasso F 2013 Science 340 331Google Scholar

    [32]

    Lee S Y, Kim S J, Kwon H, Lee B 2015 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27 705Google Scholar

    [33]

    Chen Y G, Li Z Y 2016 Plasmonics 11 1385Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li X, Zhang R R, Zhang Y Q, Ma L, He C W, Ren X R, Liu C X, Cheng C F 2018 New J. Phys. 20 063037Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang S, Wang S, Zhang Y 2018 Opt. Express 26 5461Google Scholar

    [36]

    Wang J, Zhang J 2018 Opt. Express 26 14626Google Scholar

    [37]

    Jiang Q, Bao Y J, Lin F, Zhu X, Zhang S, Fang Z Y 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1705503

    [38]

    祁云平, 周培阳, 张雪伟, 严春满, 王向贤 2018 67 107104Google Scholar

    Qi Y P, Zhou P Y, Zhang X W, Yan C M, Wang X X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 107104Google Scholar

    [39]

    Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Berlin: Springer Berlin) pp13−34

    [40]

    Fu Y Q, Zhou W, Lim L E N, Du C L, Luo X G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 061124Google Scholar

    [41]

    Shi H, Dong X, Lv Y, Du C 2009 Appl. Phys. B 95 345Google Scholar

  • 图 1  矩形纳米狭缝激发的SPPs场 (a) x方向线偏振光入射下xy方向电场强度随L的变化; (b) x方向线偏振光入射激发的场; (c) y方向线偏振光入射激发的场

    Fig. 1.  SPPs field excited by rectangular nanoslit: (a) Electric field intensity along the L curves in the x and y direction with the x-direction linearly polarized light incident; (b) electric field excited by the incident light in the x direction; (c) electric field excited by the incident light in the y direction.

    图 2  左旋圆偏振光入射下, (a) 圆狭缝、(b) 螺旋线狭缝、(c) 旋转排列的矩形纳米狭缝阵列激发SPPs原理示意图; (d) 矩形纳米狭缝双圆环阵列结构示意图

    Fig. 2.  Schematic diagram of excitation of SPPs by (a) circular slit, (b) spiral slit, (c) rotating rectangular nanoslit arrays under the incidence of left-handed circularly polarized light; (d) schematic diagram of double-ring rectangular nanoslit arrays.

    图 3  复合聚焦结构示意图 (a) 二维俯视图; (b) 截面侧视图

    Fig. 3.  Schematic diagram of compound focusing structure: (a) Two-dimensional top view; (b) sectional view.

    图 4  中心电场随狭缝深度差值变化趋势

    Fig. 4.  Variation of the center electric field with the difference of slit depth.

    图 5  左旋圆偏振光入射结构仿真图 (a) 电场分布图; (b) 电场强度切面曲线图

    Fig. 5.  Simulation diagram of left-hand circularly polarized light incident structure: (a) Electric field distribution diagram; (b) cross-section curve of electric field intensity.

    图 6  不同偏振方向线偏振光激发的电场分布 (a) $\psi = {0^\circ }$; (b) $\psi = +{45^\circ }$; (c) $\psi = {90^\circ }$; (d) $\psi = -{45^\circ }$

    Fig. 6.  Electric field distribution excited by linearly polarized light in different polarization directions: (a) $\psi = {0^\circ }$; (b) $\psi = +{45^\circ }$; (c) $\psi = {90^\circ }$; (d) $\psi = -{45^\circ }$.

    图 7  线偏振光入射结构仿真曲线 (a) 电场强度切面曲线; (b) 中心聚焦点强度随$\psi $变化曲线

    Fig. 7.  Simulation curves of linearly polarized light incident structure: (a) Section curves of electric field intensity; (b) curve of the intensity of the central focal point changing with $\psi $.

    图 8  简单结构和复合聚焦结构激发场强度曲线对比

    Fig. 8.  Comparison of the excitation field intensity curves of the simple structure and the composite focusing structure.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Barnes W L, Dereux A, Ebbesen T W 2003 Nature 424 824Google Scholar

    [2]

    Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X 2005 Science 308 534Google Scholar

    [3]

    Lieven V, Catrysse P B, Yu Z F, Fan S H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 033902Google Scholar

    [4]

    Yin L, Vlasko-Vlasov V K, Pearson J, Hiller J M, Hua J, Welp U, Brown D E, Kimball C W 2005 Nano Lett. 5 1399Google Scholar

    [5]

    Shen Z, Hu Z J, Yuan G H, Min C J, Fang H, Yuan X C 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 4627Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wang J J, Duan G T, Liu G Q, Yue L, Chen Z X, Lei X, Cai W P 2016 J. Hazard. Mater. 303 94Google Scholar

    [7]

    Coluccio M L, Francardi M, Gentile F, Candeloro P, Ferrara L, Perozziello G, Fabrizio E D 2014 Sensors 14 6056

    [8]

    Song W T, Fang Z Y, Huang S, Lin F, Zhu X 2010 Opt. Express 18 14762Google Scholar

    [9]

    Holmgaard T, Gosciniak J, Bozhevolnyi S I 2010 Opt. Express 18 23009Google Scholar

    [10]

    Raghunathan S B, Gan C H, Dijk T V, Kim B E, Schouten H F, Ubachs W, Lalanne P, Visser T D 2012 Opt. Express 20 15326Google Scholar

    [11]

    Song E Y, Lee Y L, Hong J, Lee K, Lee Y, Lee G Y, Kim H, Lee B 2016 Laser Photon. Rev. 10 299

    [12]

    López-Tejeira F, Rodrigo S G, Martín-Moreno L, García-Vidal F J, Devaux E, Ebbesen T W, Krenn J R, Radko I P, Bozhevolnyi S I, González M U 2007 Nat. Phys. 3 324Google Scholar

    [13]

    Radko I P, Bozhevolnyi S I, Brucoli G, Martín-Moreno L, García-Vidal F J, Boltasseva A 2009 Opt. Express 17 7228Google Scholar

    [14]

    Li X W, Huang L L, Tan Q F, Bai B F, Jin G F 2011 Opt. Express 19 6541Google Scholar

    [15]

    Li L, Li T, Wang S, Zhu S, Zhang X 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4357Google Scholar

    [16]

    Tanemura T, Balram K C, Dany-Sebastien L G, Pierre W, White J S, Brongersma M L, Miller D A B 2011 Nano Lett. 11 2693Google Scholar

    [17]

    Lee S Y, Kim K, Lee G Y, Lee B 2015 Opt. Express 23 15598Google Scholar

    [18]

    Lee B, Park H, Kim K Y, Kim K, Lee S Y, Kim S J 2015 Optica 2 6Google Scholar

    [19]

    Wintz D, Genevet P, Ambrosio A, Woolf A, Capasso F 2015 Nano Lett. 15 3585Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kim H, Park J, Cho S W, Lee S Y, Kang M, Lee B 2010 Nano Lett. 10 529Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y J, Thirunavukkarasu G, Babiker M, Yuan J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 094802Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu J L, Gao Y, Ran L L, Guo K, Lu Z W, Liu S T 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 013116Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen C F, Ku C T, Tai Y H, Wei P K, Lin H N, Huang C B 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2746Google Scholar

    [24]

    Rui G H, Abeysinghe D C, Nelson R L, Zhan Q W 2013 Sci. Rep. 3 2237Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhou H L, Dong J J, Zhou Y F, Zhang J H, Liu M, Zhang X L 2015 IEEE Photonics J. 7 1

    [26]

    Ren H R, Li X P, Zhang Q M, Gu M 2016 Science 352 805Google Scholar

    [27]

    Garoli D, Ongarello T, Zilio P, Carli M, Romanato F 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 1161Google Scholar

    [28]

    Garoli D, Romanato F, Carli M, Zilio P, Giorgis V 2014 Opt. Express 22 26302Google Scholar

    [29]

    Hu C B, Xu J, Ding J 2017 J. Mod. Opt. 64 1Google Scholar

    [30]

    王帅, 邓子岚, 王发强, 王晓雷, 李向平 2019 68 077801Google Scholar

    Wang S, Deng Z L, Wang F Q, Wang X L, Li X P 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 077801Google Scholar

    [31]

    Lin J, Mueller J P B, Wang Q, Yuan G H, Antoniou N, Yuan X C, Capasso F 2013 Science 340 331Google Scholar

    [32]

    Lee S Y, Kim S J, Kwon H, Lee B 2015 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 27 705Google Scholar

    [33]

    Chen Y G, Li Z Y 2016 Plasmonics 11 1385Google Scholar

    [34]

    Li X, Zhang R R, Zhang Y Q, Ma L, He C W, Ren X R, Liu C X, Cheng C F 2018 New J. Phys. 20 063037Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang S, Wang S, Zhang Y 2018 Opt. Express 26 5461Google Scholar

    [36]

    Wang J, Zhang J 2018 Opt. Express 26 14626Google Scholar

    [37]

    Jiang Q, Bao Y J, Lin F, Zhu X, Zhang S, Fang Z Y 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1705503

    [38]

    祁云平, 周培阳, 张雪伟, 严春满, 王向贤 2018 67 107104Google Scholar

    Qi Y P, Zhou P Y, Zhang X W, Yan C M, Wang X X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 107104Google Scholar

    [39]

    Maier S A 2007 Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Berlin: Springer Berlin) pp13−34

    [40]

    Fu Y Q, Zhou W, Lim L E N, Du C L, Luo X G 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 061124Google Scholar

    [41]

    Shi H, Dong X, Lv Y, Du C 2009 Appl. Phys. B 95 345Google Scholar

  • [1] 吴婉玲, 王向珂, 虞华康, 李志远. 基于微纳光纤双模式干涉的亚波长聚焦光场及光捕获应用.  , 2024, 73(10): 100401. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240181
    [2] 张彩霞, 马向超, 张建奇. Au(111)薄膜表面等离激元和热载流子输运性质的理论研究.  , 2022, 71(22): 227801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221166
    [3] 吴晗, 吴竞宇, 陈卓. 基于超表面的Tamm等离激元与激子的强耦合作用.  , 2020, 69(1): 010201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191225
    [4] 张多多, 刘小峰, 邱建荣. 基于等离激元纳米结构非线性响应的超快光开关及脉冲激光器.  , 2020, 69(18): 189101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200456
    [5] 刘姿, 张恒, 吴昊, 刘昌. Al纳米颗粒表面等离激元对ZnO光致发光增强的研究.  , 2019, 68(10): 107301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190062
    [6] 虞华康, 刘伯东, 吴婉玲, 李志远. 表面等离激元增强的光和物质相互作用.  , 2019, 68(14): 149101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190337
    [7] 张宝宝, 张成云, 张正龙, 郑海荣. 表面等离激元调控化学反应.  , 2019, 68(14): 147102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190345
    [8] 张文君, 高龙, 魏红, 徐红星. 表面等离激元传播的调制.  , 2019, 68(14): 147302. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190802
    [9] 谌璐, 陈跃刚. 金属-光折变材料复合全息结构对表面等离激元的波前调控.  , 2019, 68(6): 067101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181664
    [10] 周强, 林树培, 张朴, 陈学文. 旋转对称表面等离激元结构中极端局域光场的准正则模式分析.  , 2019, 68(14): 147104. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190434
    [11] 李盼. 表面等离激元纳米聚焦研究进展.  , 2019, 68(14): 146201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190564
    [12] 吴立祥, 李鑫, 杨元杰. 基于双层阿基米德螺线的表面等离激元涡旋产生方法.  , 2019, 68(23): 234201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190747
    [13] 王文慧, 张孬. 银纳米线表面等离激元波导的能量损耗.  , 2018, 67(24): 247302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20182085
    [14] 李明, 陈阳, 郭光灿, 任希锋. 表面等离激元量子信息应用研究进展.  , 2017, 66(14): 144202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.144202
    [15] 姜美玲, 郑立恒, 池骋, 朱星, 方哲宇. 阴极荧光在表面等离激元研究领域的应用.  , 2017, 66(14): 144201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.144201
    [16] 黄志芳, 倪亚贤, 孙华. 柱状磁光颗粒的局域表面等离激元共振及尺寸效应.  , 2016, 65(11): 114202. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.114202
    [17] 胡昌宝, 许吉, 丁剑平. 介质填充型二次柱面等离激元透镜的亚波长聚焦.  , 2016, 65(13): 137301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.137301
    [18] 盛世威, 李康, 孔繁敏, 岳庆炀, 庄华伟, 赵佳. 基于石墨烯纳米带的齿形表面等离激元滤波器的研究.  , 2015, 64(10): 108402. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108402
    [19] 李嘉明, 唐鹏, 王佳见, 黄涛, 林峰, 方哲宇, 朱星. 阿基米德螺旋微纳结构中的表面等离激元聚焦.  , 2015, 64(19): 194201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.194201
    [20] 韩清瑶, 汤俊超, 张弨, 王川, 马海强, 于丽, 焦荣珍. 局域态密度对表面等离激元特性影响的研究.  , 2012, 61(13): 135202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.135202
计量
  • 文章访问数:  9436
  • PDF下载量:  172
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-05-14
  • 修回日期:  2019-07-02
  • 上网日期:  2019-09-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-09-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map