搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

金属亚波长结构的表面增强拉曼散射

秦康 袁列荣 谭骏 彭胜 王前进 张学进 陆延青 朱永元

引用本文:
Citation:

金属亚波长结构的表面增强拉曼散射

秦康, 袁列荣, 谭骏, 彭胜, 王前进, 张学进, 陆延青, 朱永元

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of subwavelength metallic structures

Qin Kang, Yuan Lie-Rong, Tan Jun, Peng Sheng, Wang Qian-Jin, Zhang Xue-Jin, Lu Yan-Qing, Zhu Yong-Yuan
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 灵敏度高、可重复性好的固态表面增强拉曼散射基板可作为生物医学、环境科学、化学化工、纳米科技等领域的生化感测器, 具有十分重要的实际应用价值. 传统的表面增强拉曼散射基于金属颗粒提供的局域表面等离谐振这一物理机制, 但其组装不易且模式损耗大. 本文基于周期性金属亚波长结构, 构建增强拉曼散射信号的“热点”, 同时保证测量信号的可重复性. 从表面光子能带结构出发, 提出了区别于局域表面等离谐振的其他三种增强机制: 表面等离子极化激元带边增强机制、间隙等离子极化激元增强机制以及二者相耦合增强机制. 采用一定的工艺, 提高金属表面平整度, 抑制表面等离子极化激元的传播损耗, 从而提高表面增强拉曼散射的增强因子. 理论结合实验, 且二者一致性好. 研究结果有望将表面增强拉曼散射光谱技术进一步向实用化方向推进.
    Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) makes the Raman signals, as fingerprints of different vibration modes of chemical bonds, significant in practical applications. Two main mechanisms, chemical and physical, are attributed to the SERS of molecules adsorbed on metals. The physical mechanism plays a major role in SERS, which is the focus of our paper. Recent SERS systems are mostly based on dimer structures, i.e. nanoparticle pairs, of noble metals. Large amplification of electrical field occurs in the gap of a dimer structure compared with a single nanoparticle. The above gap positions are called as " hot spots” of SERS. In addition, the reproducibility and reliability of SERS substrates are also important for practical applications. Here we use periodical subwavelength metallic structures to meet such needs, and develop other kinds of electrical field enhancement mechanisms. We present the electrical field enhancement of the band-edge mode of surface plasmon polariton, gap plasmon polariton mode, as well as their coupling mode. We choose one-dimensional subwavelength metallic structures to clarify the physical mechanism. Our purpose is to develop subwavelength metallic structures with even and intensive " hot spots”, serving as ultrasensitive solid-state SERS substrates with excellent reproducibility and reliability.
      通信作者: 张学进, xuejinzh@nju.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2017YFA0303700)和国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11374150, 11274159)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Xue-Jin, xuejinzh@nju.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0303700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11374150, 11274159).
    [1]

    Fleischmann M, Hendra P J, McQuillan A J 1974 Chem. Phys. Lett. 26 163Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ringler M, Klar T A, Schwemer A, Susha A S, Stehr J, Raschke G, Funk S, Borowski M, Nichtl A, Kuerzinger K, Phillips R T, Feldmann J 2007 Nano Lett. 7 2753Google Scholar

    [3]

    Huang J S, Callegari V, Geisler P, Bruning C, Kern J, Prangsma J C, Wu X, Feichtner T, Ziegler J, Weinmann P, Kamp M, Forchel A, Biagioni P, Sennhauser U, Hecht B 2010 Nat. Commun. 1 150

    [4]

    Benz F, Tserkezis C, Herrmann L O, de Nijs B, Sanders A, Sigle D O, Pukenas L, Evans S D, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2015 Nano Lett. 15 669Google Scholar

    [5]

    Nie S M, Emory S R 1997 Science 275 1102Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kleinman S L, Ringe E, Valley N, Wustholz K L, Phillips E, Scheidt K A, Schatz G C, van Duyne R P 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 4115Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kneipp J, Kneipp H, Kneipp K 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 1052Google Scholar

    [8]

    Qian X M, Nie S M 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 912Google Scholar

    [9]

    Duan H G, Hu H L, Kumar K, Shen Z X, Yang J K W 2011 ACS Nano 5 7593Google Scholar

    [10]

    Feng L, Ma R, Wang Y, Xu D, Xiao D, Liu L, Lu N 2015 Nano Res. 8 3715Google Scholar

    [11]

    Im H, Bantz K C, Lindquist N C, Haynes C L, Oh S H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2231Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li J F, Huang Y F, Ding Y, Yang Z L, Li S B, Zhou X S, Fan F R, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Wu D Y, Ren B, Wang Z L, Tian Z Q 2010 Nature 464 392Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang H H, Liu C Y, Wu S B, Liu N W, Peng C Y, Chan T H, Hsu C F, Wang J K, Wang Y L 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 491Google Scholar

    [14]

    Engheta N, Ziolkowski R W 2006 Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations (Hoboken: Wiley)

    [15]

    Yu N F, Genevet P, Kats M A, Aieta F, Tetienne J P, Capasso F, Gaburro Z 2011 Science 334 333Google Scholar

    [16]

    Le Ru E C, Etchegoin P G 2006 Chem. Phys. Lett. 423 63Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sakoda K 1999 Opt. Express 4 167Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ding F, Yang Y Q, Deshpande R A, Bozhevolnyi S I 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1129Google Scholar

    [19]

    Le Ru E C, Blackie E, Meyer M, Etchegoin P G 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 13794

  • 图 1  (a)一维金属亚波长结构示意图; (b) D = 30 nm时, SERS增强因子随周期P和占空比γ的变化

    Fig. 1.  (a) The cross-sectional sketch of the one-dimensional gratings; (b) the calculated enhancement factor as a function of the period and duty ratio.

    图 2  (a)计算的不同周期的SPP能带结构图, 其中白色虚线表示λ = 532 nm位置; (b)计算的不同周期结构在532 nm的反射率以及SERS增强因子; (c)对应(b)中四个不同周期值的电场分布图

    Fig. 2.  (a) The calculated bandgap structures for various periods but the same depth and duty ratio; (b) the calculated enhancement factor and reflectivity as a function of the period; (c) the calculated electric field distribution of structures with different periods corresponding to the positions A, B, C, and D in (b).

    图 3  (a)计算的不同深度的GPP能带结构图; (b)周期P = 200 nm时, 计算的SERS增强因子随深度以及槽的宽度的变化图; (c)图(b)中三个位置处的电场分布图; (d)周期P = 200 nm, 槽的宽度Wg = 20 nm时, 计算的不同深度的SERS增强因子

    Fig. 3.  (a) The calculated bandgap structures for different depths but the same period and width; (b) the calculated enhancement factor as a function of depth and groove width, in which the period is set as 200 nm; (c) the electric field distribution of structures with different depths and widths, corresponding to the positions A, B, and C in (b); (d) the calculated enhancement factor as a function of the depth.

    图 4  (a)双槽结构示意图; (b)计算的不同深度的双槽结构的能带结构图; (c)计算的不同深度的SERS增强因子; (d)计算的不同深度下的电场分布图, 对应于(c)中的A, B和C点的参数

    Fig. 4.  (a) The cross-sectional sketch of the structure with double grooves; (b) the calculated bandgap structures for different depths with P = 475 nm, W1 = 182 nm and W2 = 20 nm; (c) the calculated enhancement factor as a function of the depth; (d) the calculated electric field distribution of different depth corresponding to the positions A, B, and C in (c).

    图 5  (a)撕膜的工艺流程; (b)镀Ag膜样品表面直接加工光栅的SEM图; (c)通过撕膜方法获得光栅的SEM图; (d)镀膜和撕膜Ag表面的SPP传播测量结果

    Fig. 5.  (a) Schematic diagram of the template stripping process; (b) the SEM images of gratings on coated Ag film; (c) the SEM images of stripped Ag gratings; (d) the propagation measurements of 633 nm laser on conventional Ag film and stripped Ag surface.

    图 6  不同周期的SPP能带结构测量结果, 与图2(a)中的计算结果相对应

    Fig. 6.  Experimental bandgap structures corresponding to those in Fig. 2 (a).

    图 7  (a) 4-ATP分子在Ag基板上的拉曼散射光谱; (b)测量的不同周期结构的SERS增强因子; (c)拉曼散射的空间扫描测量结果图

    Fig. 7.  (a) The Raman spectrum of 4-ATP molecules on Ag substrate; (b) the experimental enhancement factor as a function of the period; (c) SERS mapping image at 1145 cm–1

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Fleischmann M, Hendra P J, McQuillan A J 1974 Chem. Phys. Lett. 26 163Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ringler M, Klar T A, Schwemer A, Susha A S, Stehr J, Raschke G, Funk S, Borowski M, Nichtl A, Kuerzinger K, Phillips R T, Feldmann J 2007 Nano Lett. 7 2753Google Scholar

    [3]

    Huang J S, Callegari V, Geisler P, Bruning C, Kern J, Prangsma J C, Wu X, Feichtner T, Ziegler J, Weinmann P, Kamp M, Forchel A, Biagioni P, Sennhauser U, Hecht B 2010 Nat. Commun. 1 150

    [4]

    Benz F, Tserkezis C, Herrmann L O, de Nijs B, Sanders A, Sigle D O, Pukenas L, Evans S D, Aizpurua J, Baumberg J J 2015 Nano Lett. 15 669Google Scholar

    [5]

    Nie S M, Emory S R 1997 Science 275 1102Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kleinman S L, Ringe E, Valley N, Wustholz K L, Phillips E, Scheidt K A, Schatz G C, van Duyne R P 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 4115Google Scholar

    [7]

    Kneipp J, Kneipp H, Kneipp K 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 1052Google Scholar

    [8]

    Qian X M, Nie S M 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 912Google Scholar

    [9]

    Duan H G, Hu H L, Kumar K, Shen Z X, Yang J K W 2011 ACS Nano 5 7593Google Scholar

    [10]

    Feng L, Ma R, Wang Y, Xu D, Xiao D, Liu L, Lu N 2015 Nano Res. 8 3715Google Scholar

    [11]

    Im H, Bantz K C, Lindquist N C, Haynes C L, Oh S H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 2231Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li J F, Huang Y F, Ding Y, Yang Z L, Li S B, Zhou X S, Fan F R, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Wu D Y, Ren B, Wang Z L, Tian Z Q 2010 Nature 464 392Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang H H, Liu C Y, Wu S B, Liu N W, Peng C Y, Chan T H, Hsu C F, Wang J K, Wang Y L 2006 Adv. Mater. 18 491Google Scholar

    [14]

    Engheta N, Ziolkowski R W 2006 Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations (Hoboken: Wiley)

    [15]

    Yu N F, Genevet P, Kats M A, Aieta F, Tetienne J P, Capasso F, Gaburro Z 2011 Science 334 333Google Scholar

    [16]

    Le Ru E C, Etchegoin P G 2006 Chem. Phys. Lett. 423 63Google Scholar

    [17]

    Sakoda K 1999 Opt. Express 4 167Google Scholar

    [18]

    Ding F, Yang Y Q, Deshpande R A, Bozhevolnyi S I 2018 Nanophotonics 7 1129Google Scholar

    [19]

    Le Ru E C, Blackie E, Meyer M, Etchegoin P G 2007 J. Phys. Chem. C 111 13794

  • [1] 刘文英, 王公堂, 段鹏怡, 张文杰, 张灿, 胡晓璇, 刘玫. F4TCNQ/MoS2纳米复合异质材料的表面结构对SERS的影响.  , 2023, 72(3): 037402. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221958
    [2] 郑林启, 时术华, 李金泽, 王子宇, 李爽. 高温退火优化h-BN/Ag/Ag2O异质结构型及表面增强拉曼散射性能研究.  , 2023, 72(22): 227401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231105
    [3] 厉桂华, 张梦雅, 马慧, 田悦, 焦安欣, 郑林启, 王畅, 陈明, 刘向东, 李爽, 崔清强, 李冠华. 低温促进表面等离激元共振效应及肌酐的超灵敏表面增强拉曼散射探测.  , 2022, 71(14): 146101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220151
    [4] 赵星, 郝祺, 倪振华, 邱腾. 单分子表面增强拉曼散射的光谱特性及分析方法.  , 2021, 70(13): 137401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201447
    [5] 岑贵, 张志斌, 吕新宇, 刘开辉, 李志强. 金属衬底上石墨烯的红外近场光学.  , 2020, 69(2): 027803. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191598
    [6] 吴美梅, 张超, 张灿, 孙倩倩, 刘玫. 三维金字塔立体复合基底表面增强拉曼散射特性.  , 2020, 69(5): 058103. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191636
    [7] 段嘉华, 陈佳宁. 二维极化激元学近场研究进展.  , 2019, 68(11): 110701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190341
    [8] 李金华, 张思楠, 翟英娇, 马剑刚, 房文汇, 张昱. MoS2及其金属复合表面增强拉曼散射基底的发展及应用.  , 2019, 68(13): 134203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182113
    [9] 王向贤, 白雪琳, 庞志远, 杨华, 祁云平, 温晓镭. 聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯间隔的金纳米立方体与金膜复合结构的表面增强拉曼散射研究.  , 2019, 68(3): 037301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190054
    [10] 程自强, 石海泉, 余萍, 刘志敏. 银纳米颗粒阵列的表面增强拉曼散射效应研究.  , 2018, 67(19): 197302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180650
    [11] 张学进, 陆延青, 陈延峰, 朱永元, 祝世宁. 太赫兹表面极化激元.  , 2017, 66(14): 148705. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.148705
    [12] 郭旭东, 唐军, 刘文耀, 郭浩, 房国成, 赵苗苗, 王磊, 夏美晶, 刘俊. 锥柱型光纤探针在表面增强拉曼散射方面的应用.  , 2017, 66(4): 044208. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.044208
    [13] 焦悦, 陶海岩, 季博宇, 宋晓伟, 林景全. 用于飞秒激光纳米加工的TiO2粒子阵列诱导多种基底表面近场增强.  , 2017, 66(14): 144203. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.144203
    [14] 汤建, 刘爱萍, 李培刚, 沈静琴, 唐为华. 界面自组装的金/氧化石墨烯复合材料的表面增强拉曼散射行为研究.  , 2014, 63(10): 107801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.107801
    [15] 章志敏, 王秉中, 葛广顶, 梁木生, 丁帅. 亚波长金属线阵中一维时间反演电磁波的聚焦机理研究.  , 2012, 61(9): 098401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.098401
    [16] 章志敏, 王秉中, 葛广顶. 一种用于时间反演通信的亚波长天线阵列设计.  , 2012, 61(5): 058402. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.058402
    [17] 黄茜, 熊绍珍, 赵颖, 张晓丹. 表面等离子激元非线性表面增强拉曼散射效应.  , 2012, 61(15): 157801. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.157801
    [18] 黄茜, 王京, 曹丽冉, 孙建, 张晓丹, 耿卫东, 熊绍珍, 赵颖. 纳米Ag材料表面等离子体激元引起的表面增强拉曼散射光谱研究.  , 2009, 58(3): 1980-1986. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1980
    [19] 吴青松, 赵 岩, 张彩碚, 李 峰. 片状三角形银纳米颗粒的自组织行为与光学特性.  , 2005, 54(3): 1452-1456. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1452
    [20] 王子洋, 李 勤, 赵 钧, 郭继华. 透射式扫描近场光学显微镜探针光场分布及其受激荧光分子光场分布研究.  , 2000, 49(10): 1959-1964. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1959
计量
  • 文章访问数:  10802
  • PDF下载量:  321
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-30
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-06
  • 上网日期:  2019-07-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-07-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map