Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

High resolution imaging based on photo-emission electron microscopy excited by deep ultraviolet laser

Lü Hao-Chang Zhao Yun-Chi Yang Guang Dong Bo-Wen Qi Jie Zhang Jing-Yan Zhu Zhao-Zhao Sun Yang Yu Guang-Hua Jiang Yong Wei Hong-Xiang Wang Jing Lu Jun Wang Zhi-Hong Cai Jian-Wang Shen Bao-Gen Yang Feng Zhang Shen-Jin Wang Shou-Guo

Citation:

High resolution imaging based on photo-emission electron microscopy excited by deep ultraviolet laser

Lü Hao-Chang, Zhao Yun-Chi, Yang Guang, Dong Bo-Wen, Qi Jie, Zhang Jing-Yan, Zhu Zhao-Zhao, Sun Yang, Yu Guang-Hua, Jiang Yong, Wei Hong-Xiang, Wang Jing, Lu Jun, Wang Zhi-Hong, Cai Jian-Wang, Shen Bao-Gen, Yang Feng, Zhang Shen-Jin, Wang Shou-Guo
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Magnetic imaging technology based on photo-emission electron microscopy (PEEM) has become an important and powerful tool for observing the magnetic domain in spintronics. The PEEM can get access to real-time imaging with high spatial resolution and is greatly sensitive to the spectroscopic information directly from the magnetic films and surfaces through photoemission process with variable excitation sources. Moreover, the breakthrough in the deep ultraviolet (DUV) laser technology makes it possible to realize domain imaging without the limitation of synchrotron radiation facilities or the direct excitation of photoelectrons due to the high enough photon energy of the source in the current threshold excitation study. In this review article, the deep ultraviolet photo-emission electron microscopy system is first introduced briefly. Then, a detailed study of the magnetic domain observation for the surface of L10-FePt films by the DUV-PEEM technique is presented, where a spatial resolution as high as 43.2 nm is successfully achieved. The above results clearly indicate that the DUV-PEEM reaches a level equivalent to the level reached by X-ray photoemission imaging technique. Finally, a series of recent progress of perpendicular FePt magnetic thin films obtained by the DUV-PEEM technique is provided in detail. For example, a stepped Cr seeding layer is used to form the large-area epitaxial FePt films with (001) and (111) two orientations, where magnetic linear dichroism (MLD) with large asymmetry is observed in the transition area of two phases. The signal of MLD is 4.6 times larger than that of magnetic circular dichroism. These results demonstrate that the magnetic imaging technology based on DUV-PEEM with excellent resolution ability will potentially become an important method to study magnetic materials in the future.
      Corresponding author: Wang Shou-Guo, sgwang@ustb.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51625101, 51961145305, 51971026, 51431009) and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities, China (Grant No. FRF-TP-16-OO1C2)
    [1]

    Hoffmann A, Bader S D 2015 Phys. Rev. Appl. 4 047001Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, Von M S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488Google Scholar

    [3]

    Osaka T, Takai M, Hayashi K, Ohashi K, Saito M, Yamada K 1998 Nature 392 796Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ohnuma S, Fujimori H, Masumoto T, Xiong X Y, Ping D H, Hono K 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 946Google Scholar

    [5]

    Pan L, Bogy D B 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 189Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tregenza T, Butlin R K, Wedell N 2000 Nature 407 150

    [7]

    Allwood D A, Xiong G, Cooke M D, Faulkner C C, Atkinson D, Vernier N, Cowburn R P 2002 Science 296 2003Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tudosa I, Stamm C, Kashuba A B, King F, Siegmann H C, Stöhr J, Ju G, Lu B, Weller D 2004 Nature 428 831Google Scholar

    [9]

    Parkin S S P, Hayashi M, Thomas L 2008 Science 320 190Google Scholar

    [10]

    Allwood D A, Xiong G, Faulkner C C, Atkinson D, Petit D, Cowburn R P 2005 Science 209 1688

    [11]

    Jue E, Safeer C K, Drouard M, Lopez A, Balint P, Buda-Prejbeanu L, Boulle O, Auffret S, Schuhl A, Manchon A, Miron I M, Gaudin G 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 272Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ma E Y, Cui Y T, Ueda K, Tang S, Chen K, Tamura N, Wu P M, Fujioka J, Tokura Y, Shen Z X 2015 Science 350 538Google Scholar

    [13]

    Yoshimura Y, Kim K J, Taniguchi T, Tono T, Ueda K, Hiramatsu R, Moriyama T, Yamada K, Nakatani Y, Ono T 2015 Nat. Phys. 12 157

    [14]

    Wagner K, Kakay A, Schultheiss K, Henschke A, Sebastian T, Schultheiss H 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 432Google Scholar

    [15]

    Currivan-Incorvia J A, Siddiqui S, Dutta S, Evarts E R, Zhang J, Bono D, Ross C A, Baldo M A 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10275Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jiang W, Upadhyaya P, Zhang W, Yu G, Jungfleisch M B, Fradin F Y, Pearson J E, Tserkovnyak Y, Wang K L, Heinonen O, te Velthuis S G E, Hoffmann A 2015 Science 349 283Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hsiao C H, Yao Y D, Lo S C, Chang H W, Ouyang C 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 142407Google Scholar

    [18]

    Pollath S, Wild J, Heinen L, Meier T N G, Kronseder M, Tutsch L, Bauer A, Berger H, Pfleiderer C, Zweck J, Rosch A, Back C H 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 207205Google Scholar

    [19]

    Cai K, Yang M, Ju H, Wang S, Ji Y, Li B, Edmonds K W, Sheng Y, Zhang B, Zhang N, Liu S, Zheng H, Wang K 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 712Google Scholar

    [20]

    Je S G, Kim D H, Yoo S C, Min B C, Lee K J, Choe S B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 214401Google Scholar

    [21]

    Welp U, Vlasko-Vlasov V K, Liu X, Furdyna J K, Wojtowicz T 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 167206Google Scholar

    [22]

    Speckmann M, Oepen H P, Ibach H 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 2035Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen G, Ma T, N'Diaye A T, Kwon H, Won C, Wu Y, Schmid A K 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2671Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhang S, Kronast F, van der Laan G, Hesjedal T 2018 Nano Lett. 18 1057Google Scholar

    [25]

    Da Col S, Jamet S, Rougemaille N, Locatelli A, Mentes T O, Burgos B S, Afid R, Darques M, Cagnon L, Toussaint J C, Fruchart O 2014 Phys.Rev. B 89 180405Google Scholar

    [26]

    Moubah R, Elzo M, El. Moussaoui S, Colson D, Jaouen N, Belkhou R, Viret M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 042406Google Scholar

    [27]

    Nolting F, Scholl A, Stöhr J, Seo J W, Fompeyrine J, Siegwart H, Locquet J P, Anders S, Lüning J, Fullerton E E, Toney M F, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A 2000 Nature 405 767Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhao T, Scholl A, Zavaliche F, Lee K, Barry M, Doran A, Cruz M P, Chu Y H, Ederer C, Spaldin N A, Das R R, Kim D M, Baek S H, Eom C B, Ramesh R 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 823Google Scholar

    [29]

    He Q, Chu Y H, Heron J T, Yang S Y, Liang W I, Kuo C Y, Lin H J, Yu P, Liang C W, Zeches R J, Kuo W C, Juang J Y, Chen C T, Arenholz E, Scholl A, Ramesh R 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 225Google Scholar

    [30]

    Boulle O, Vogel J, Yang H, Pizzini S, de Souza C D, Locatelli A, Mentes T O, Sala A, Buda-Prejbeanu L D, Klein O, Belmeguenai M, Roussigne Y, Stashkevich A, Cherif S M, Aballe L, Foerster M, Chshiev M, Auffret S, Miron I M, Gaudin G 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 449Google Scholar

    [31]

    Cheng X M, Keavney D J 2012 Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 026501Google Scholar

    [32]

    吴义政 2010 物理 39 406

    Wu Y Z 2010 Physics 39 406

    [33]

    Kuch W, Schneider C M 2001 Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 147Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kuch W, Gilles J, Kang S S, Imada S, Suga S, Kirschner J 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 3824

    [35]

    Kuch W, Dittschar A, Meinel K, Zharnikov M, Schneider C M, Kirschner J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 11621Google Scholar

    [36]

    Stöhr J 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 470Google Scholar

    [37]

    Andersson C, Sanyal B, Eriksson O, Nordstrom L, Karis O, Arvanitis D, Konishi T, Holub-Krappe E, Dunn J H 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 177207Google Scholar

    [38]

    Yu P, Lee J S, Okamoto S, Rossell M D, Huijben M, Yang C H, He Q, Zhang J X, Yang S Y, Lee M J, Ramasse Q M, Erni R, Chu Y H, Arena D A, Kao C C, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 027201Google Scholar

    [39]

    Baruth A, Keavney D J, Burton J D, Janicka K, Tsymbal E Y, Yuan L, Liou S H, Adenwalla S 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 054419Google Scholar

    [40]

    Bernien M, Miguel J, Weis C, Ali M E, Kurde J, Krumme B, Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Piantek M, Srivastava P, Baberschke K, Oppeneer P M, Eriksson O, Kuch W, Wende H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 047202Google Scholar

    [41]

    Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park J G, Noh H J, Kim J Y, Park J H, Hwang N M, Hyeon T 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 891Google Scholar

    [42]

    丁海峰, 董国胜, 金晓峰 1998 物理 27 621

    Ding H F, Dong G S, Jin X F 1998 Physics 27 621

    [43]

    Rampe A, Güntherodt G 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 14370Google Scholar

    [44]

    Marx G K L, Elmers H J, Schönhense G 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5888Google Scholar

    [45]

    Arenholz E, van der Laan G, Chopdekar R V, Suzuki Y 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 197201Google Scholar

    [46]

    Wu J, Choi J, Scholl A, Doran A, Arenholz E, Wu Y Z, Won C, Hwang C, Qiu Z Q 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 012409Google Scholar

    [47]

    Scholl A, Stöhr J, Lüning J, Seo J W, Fompeyrine J, Siegwart H, Locquet J P, Nolting F, Anders S, Fullerton E E, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A 2000 Science 287 1014Google Scholar

    [48]

    Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Anders S, Hillebrecht F U, Stöhr J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2878Google Scholar

    [49]

    Schwickert M M, Guo G Y, Tomaz M A, O’Brien W L, Harp G R 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 4289Google Scholar

    [50]

    Wadley P, Howells B, Železný J, Andrews C, Hills V, Campion R P, Novák V, Olejník K, Maccherozzi F, Dhesi S S, Martin S Y, Wagner T, Wunderlich J, Freimuth F, Mokrousov Y, Kuneš J, Chauhan J S, Grzybowski M J, Rushforth A W, Edmonds K W, Gallagher B L, Jungwirth T 2016 Science 351 587Google Scholar

    [51]

    Sanchez-Barriga J, Varykhalov A, Springholz G, Steiner H, Kirchschlager R, Bauer G, Caha O, Schierle E, Weschke E, Unal A A, Valencia S, Dunst M, Braun J, Ebert H, Minar J, Golias E, Yashina L V, Ney A, Holy V, Rader O 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10559Google Scholar

    [52]

    Rodríguez A F, Nolting F, Bansmann J, Kleibert A, Heyderman L J 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316 426Google Scholar

    [53]

    Scholl A, Ohldag H, Nolting F, Stöhr J, Padmore H A 2002 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 1362Google Scholar

    [54]

    Marx G K L, Jubert P O, Bischof A, Allenspach R 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2925Google Scholar

    [55]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 237402Google Scholar

    [56]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T, Hosaka M, Katoh M 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 023907Google Scholar

    [57]

    Hild K, Maul J, Meng T, Kallmayer M, Schonhense G, Elmers H J, Ramos R, Arora S K, Shvets I V 2008 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20 235218Google Scholar

    [58]

    Hild K, Emmel J, Schönhense G, Elmers H J 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 224426Google Scholar

    [59]

    Nakagawa T, Watanabe K, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama T 2009 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21 314010Google Scholar

    [60]

    Kronseder M, Minár J, Braun J, Günther S, Woltersdorf G, Ebert H, Back C H 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 132404Google Scholar

    [61]

    Taniuchi T, Kotani Y, Shin S 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 023701Google Scholar

    [62]

    Michaelson H B 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48 4729Google Scholar

    [63]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T 2012 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 185 356Google Scholar

    [64]

    Nakagawa T, Yamamoto I, Takagi Y, Yokoyama T 2010 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 181 164Google Scholar

    [65]

    许祖彦 2009 中国激光 36 1619Google Scholar

    Xu Z Y 2009 Chin. J. Las. 36 1619Google Scholar

    [66]

    Chen C T, Lu J H, Togashi T, Suganuma T, Sekikawa T, Watanabe S, Xu Z Y, Wang J 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 637Google Scholar

    [67]

    宁艳晓, 傅强, 包信和 2016 物理化学学报 32 171Google Scholar

    Ning Y X, Fu Q, Bao X H 2016 Acta. Phys. Chim. Sin. 32 171Google Scholar

    [68]

    曹凝, 傅强, 包信和 2012 中国科学院院刊 27 103Google Scholar

    Cao N, Fu Q, Bao X H 2012 Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 27 103Google Scholar

    [69]

    Zhao Y C, Lyu H C, Yang G, Dong B W, Qi J, Zhang J Y, Zhu Z Z, Sun Y, Yu G H, Jiang Y, Wei H X, Wang J, Lu J, Wang Z H, Cai J W, Shen B G, Zhan W S, Yang F, Zhang S J, Wang S G 2019 Ultramicroscopy 202 156Google Scholar

    [70]

    Cui Y, Fu Q, Bao X 2010 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 5053Google Scholar

    [71]

    赵云驰 2019 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院物理研究所)

    Zhao Y C 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science) (in Chinese)

    [72]

    Yang G, Li D L, Wang S G, Ma Q L, Liang S H, Wei H X, Han X F, Hesjedal T, Ward R C C, Kohn A, Elkayam A, Tal N, Zhang X G 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 083904Google Scholar

    [73]

    Hopster H, Oepen H P 2005 Magnetic Microscopy of Nanostructures (Berlin: Springer) p138

    [74]

    Stöhr J, Scholl A, Regan T J, Anders S, Lüning J, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A, White R L 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1862Google Scholar

    [75]

    Taniuchi T, Yasuhara R, Kumigashira H, Kubota M, Okazaki H, Wakita T, Yokoya T, Ono K, Oshima M, Lippmaa M, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2007 Surf. Sci. 601 4690Google Scholar

    [76]

    Schmidt T, Sala A, Marchetto H, Umbach E, Freund H J 2013 Ultramicroscopy 126 23Google Scholar

    [77]

    Sandig O, Herrero-Albillos J, Römer F M, Friedenberger N, Kurde J, Noll T, Farle M, Kronast F 2012 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 185 365Google Scholar

    [78]

    Lairson B M, Visokay M R, Sinclair R, Hagstrom S, Clemens B M 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 1390Google Scholar

    [79]

    Cillessen J F M, Wolf R M, d Leeuw D M 1993 Thin Solid Films 226 53Google Scholar

    [80]

    Nieuwenhuys B E, Sachtler W M H 1973 Surf. Sci. 34 317Google Scholar

    [81]

    Holcomb M B, Martin L W, Scholl A, He Q, Yu P, Yang C H, Yang S Y, Glans P A, Valvidares M, Huijben M, Kortright J B, Guo J, Chu Y H, Ramesh R 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 134406Google Scholar

    [82]

    Sander A, Christl M, Chiang C-T, Alexe M, Widdra W 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 224102Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)通过λ/4波片输出圆偏振态DUV激光; (b)通过λ/2波片调制DUV激光线偏振态[69]

    Figure 1.  Schematic drawings of the DUV laser optical system with (a) circular and (b) linear polarizations[69].

    图 2  深紫外激光与PEEM的连接示意图

    Figure 2.  Optical system of the DUV-PEEM system.

    图 3  深紫外激光-光发射电子显微镜系统装置示意图[69]

    Figure 3.  A schematic layout of the DUV laser-based LEEM/PEEM system[69].

    图 4  MBE-PEEM系统连接示意图和实物照片

    Figure 4.  Schematic setup and photo of MBE-PEEM combined system.

    图 5  (a) Hg灯激发下碳原子吸附于Ru (0001) 表面的PEEM图像; (b)在PEEM图像所示位置进行线扫描的归一化强度曲线与计算得到的空间分辨率[71]

    Figure 5.  (a) PEEM image of multilayer graphene on Ru (0001) taken with Hg arc lamp; (b) spatial resolution calculated from obtained PEEM image[71].

    图 6  LEEM模式的电子光路系统(电子枪部分)

    Figure 6.  Optical system of LEEM (E-Gun).

    图 7  (a) Si (001) 的LEEM暗场像; (b) Si (001) 表面的(2 × 1)重构LEED图像; (c)在LEEM图像所示位置进行线扫描的归一化强度曲线与计算得到的空间分辨率[71]

    Figure 7.  (a) Dark field image and (b) LEED pattern of a (2 × 1) reconstructed Si (001) surface; (c) spatial resolution calculated from obtained LEEM image[71].

    图 8  (a)单晶Ru (0001) 表面生长的岛状PbO的DUV-PEEM图像; (b)在PEEM图像所示位置进行线扫描的归一化强度曲线与计算得到的空间分辨率[71]

    Figure 8.  (a) DUV-PEEM image of PbO islands on Ru(0001); (b) spatial resolution calculated from obtained PEEM image[71].

    图 9  (a) PEEM系统能量狭缝的结构示意图; (b)色散模式下采集得到的单晶Ru (0001)上生长岛状PbO样品的深紫外激光-光发射谱图; (c)线扫描得到的费米边附近激光光发射谱的归一化强度曲线

    Figure 9.  (a) Schematic drawing of energy filter in PEEM system; (b) DUV-photo emission spectrum obtained from island-shaped PbO grown on Ru (0001) in dispersion mode; (c) normalized line profile with the calculated spatial resolution from selected area marked in panel (b).

    图 10  (a) MgO/Cr (5 nm)/Pt (10 nm)/FePt (20nm)结构样品垂直于膜面的磁滞回线; (b) FePt薄膜的LEEM图像(Ep = 8.6 eV), 插图所示为该区域的LEED图像(Ep = 16.3 eV); (c)图(b)红色方框标识区域使用圆偏振DUV获得的PEEM磁畴图像; (d)使用磁力显微镜采集同一样品的磁畴照片; (e)插图所示视野内对DUV-PEEM磁畴成像空间分辨率的测定[69]

    Figure 10.  (a) Schematic structure and out-of-plane hysteresis loop of MgO (001) sub. /Cr (5 nm)/Pt (10 nm)/FePt (20 nm) films; (b) LEEM image (Ep = 8.6 eV) and LEED (Ep = 16.3 eV) pattern (inset) of FePt film; (c) magnetic domain (contrast enhanced) of the area marked by a red dashed rectangle in (b) taken with circularly polarized DUV laser; (d) magnetic domain image of the FePt films with the same structure obtained by magnetic force microscopy; (e) normalized line profile with the estimated spatial resolution from selected area marked in inset[69].

    图 11  (a) Cr纳米台阶上外延生长的Pt种子层结构示意图; (b) Pt种子层的UV-PEEM图像; (c)暗区A对应的LEEM与LEED图像; (d)亮区B对应的LEEM与LEED图像; (e)过渡区域的LEEM图像(区域A, B与C的位置在(b)图中标出); (f) Pt种子层选区((b)图中红色线框) DUV-PEEM图像; (g)与(f)图同区域的线二色DUV-PEEM图像[69]

    Figure 11.  (a) Schematic drawing of a Pt seed layer with Cr step. (b) UV PEEM image of Pt seed layer consisting of two orientations. LEEM and LEED patterns of the selected areas marked by blue rectangles in panel (b): (c) dark area A, (d) light area B and (e) boundary area C. (f) DUV-PEEM image of the selected area marked by a red dashed rectangle in panel (b). (g) Linear dichroism image of the same area as panel (f)[69].

    图 12  (a)在具有双晶体取向的Pt种子层上生长FePt后的UV-PEEM图像; (b)区域I ((a)图标注位置)的LEED图像; (c)区域II的LEED图像; (d)使用线偏振态深紫外激光在选定区域((a)图红色线框标记位置)采集的DUV-PEEM图像[69]

    Figure 12.  (a) UV-PEEM image of FePt film deposited on Pt seed layer with two orientations. LEED patterns of selected areas marked by blue rectangles in panel (a): (b) light area I and (c) dark area II. (d) DUV-PEEM image of the selected area marked by a red dashed rectangle in panel (a) taken with linearly polarized laser[69].

    图 13  在同一视野下分别使用(a)左旋与(b)右旋的圆偏振态深紫外激光采集的DUV-PEEM图像; (c)计算得到的MCD磁畴图像; 在同一视野下分别使用偏振方向为(d)竖直与(e)水平的线偏振态激光采集的DUV-PEEM图像; (f)计算所得MLD磁畴图像; (g)磁线二色衬度随激光偏振方向的变化规律[69]

    Figure 13.  DUV-PEEM images taken with (a) left-circularly polarized and (b) right-circularly polarized light; (c) MCD image of FePt film; (d), (e) DUV-PEEM images taken with linearly-polarized laser (polarization shown by red arrow); (f) MLD image of FePt film; (g) polarization dependent MLD asymmetry for the selected area[69].

    表 1  三种光源的特性比较[65]

    Table 1.  Properties comparing of the three source[65].

    Source
    DUV-DPLSynchrotron radiationGas discharge laser
    Energy resolution/meV~0.261—5~1.2
    Photon circulation1014—10151010—1012~1012
    Photon flux density/photon·s–1·cm–21019—10201012—1014< 1014
    Wavelength range/nm170—2101—21058.5
    Mode of operationns, ps, fs pulseps pulsecontinuous wave
    Detection depth/nm~10 (bulk effect)0.5—2 (skin effect)~0.5 (skin effect)
    DownLoad: CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Hoffmann A, Bader S D 2015 Phys. Rev. Appl. 4 047001Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wolf S A, Awschalom D D, Buhrman R A, Daughton J M, Von M S, Roukes M L, Chtchelkanova A Y, Treger D M 2001 Science 294 1488Google Scholar

    [3]

    Osaka T, Takai M, Hayashi K, Ohashi K, Saito M, Yamada K 1998 Nature 392 796Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ohnuma S, Fujimori H, Masumoto T, Xiong X Y, Ping D H, Hono K 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 946Google Scholar

    [5]

    Pan L, Bogy D B 2009 Nat. Photonics 3 189Google Scholar

    [6]

    Tregenza T, Butlin R K, Wedell N 2000 Nature 407 150

    [7]

    Allwood D A, Xiong G, Cooke M D, Faulkner C C, Atkinson D, Vernier N, Cowburn R P 2002 Science 296 2003Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tudosa I, Stamm C, Kashuba A B, King F, Siegmann H C, Stöhr J, Ju G, Lu B, Weller D 2004 Nature 428 831Google Scholar

    [9]

    Parkin S S P, Hayashi M, Thomas L 2008 Science 320 190Google Scholar

    [10]

    Allwood D A, Xiong G, Faulkner C C, Atkinson D, Petit D, Cowburn R P 2005 Science 209 1688

    [11]

    Jue E, Safeer C K, Drouard M, Lopez A, Balint P, Buda-Prejbeanu L, Boulle O, Auffret S, Schuhl A, Manchon A, Miron I M, Gaudin G 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 272Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ma E Y, Cui Y T, Ueda K, Tang S, Chen K, Tamura N, Wu P M, Fujioka J, Tokura Y, Shen Z X 2015 Science 350 538Google Scholar

    [13]

    Yoshimura Y, Kim K J, Taniguchi T, Tono T, Ueda K, Hiramatsu R, Moriyama T, Yamada K, Nakatani Y, Ono T 2015 Nat. Phys. 12 157

    [14]

    Wagner K, Kakay A, Schultheiss K, Henschke A, Sebastian T, Schultheiss H 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 432Google Scholar

    [15]

    Currivan-Incorvia J A, Siddiqui S, Dutta S, Evarts E R, Zhang J, Bono D, Ross C A, Baldo M A 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10275Google Scholar

    [16]

    Jiang W, Upadhyaya P, Zhang W, Yu G, Jungfleisch M B, Fradin F Y, Pearson J E, Tserkovnyak Y, Wang K L, Heinonen O, te Velthuis S G E, Hoffmann A 2015 Science 349 283Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hsiao C H, Yao Y D, Lo S C, Chang H W, Ouyang C 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 142407Google Scholar

    [18]

    Pollath S, Wild J, Heinen L, Meier T N G, Kronseder M, Tutsch L, Bauer A, Berger H, Pfleiderer C, Zweck J, Rosch A, Back C H 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 207205Google Scholar

    [19]

    Cai K, Yang M, Ju H, Wang S, Ji Y, Li B, Edmonds K W, Sheng Y, Zhang B, Zhang N, Liu S, Zheng H, Wang K 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 712Google Scholar

    [20]

    Je S G, Kim D H, Yoo S C, Min B C, Lee K J, Choe S B 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 214401Google Scholar

    [21]

    Welp U, Vlasko-Vlasov V K, Liu X, Furdyna J K, Wojtowicz T 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 167206Google Scholar

    [22]

    Speckmann M, Oepen H P, Ibach H 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 2035Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen G, Ma T, N'Diaye A T, Kwon H, Won C, Wu Y, Schmid A K 2013 Nat. Commun. 4 2671Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhang S, Kronast F, van der Laan G, Hesjedal T 2018 Nano Lett. 18 1057Google Scholar

    [25]

    Da Col S, Jamet S, Rougemaille N, Locatelli A, Mentes T O, Burgos B S, Afid R, Darques M, Cagnon L, Toussaint J C, Fruchart O 2014 Phys.Rev. B 89 180405Google Scholar

    [26]

    Moubah R, Elzo M, El. Moussaoui S, Colson D, Jaouen N, Belkhou R, Viret M 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 042406Google Scholar

    [27]

    Nolting F, Scholl A, Stöhr J, Seo J W, Fompeyrine J, Siegwart H, Locquet J P, Anders S, Lüning J, Fullerton E E, Toney M F, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A 2000 Nature 405 767Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhao T, Scholl A, Zavaliche F, Lee K, Barry M, Doran A, Cruz M P, Chu Y H, Ederer C, Spaldin N A, Das R R, Kim D M, Baek S H, Eom C B, Ramesh R 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 823Google Scholar

    [29]

    He Q, Chu Y H, Heron J T, Yang S Y, Liang W I, Kuo C Y, Lin H J, Yu P, Liang C W, Zeches R J, Kuo W C, Juang J Y, Chen C T, Arenholz E, Scholl A, Ramesh R 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 225Google Scholar

    [30]

    Boulle O, Vogel J, Yang H, Pizzini S, de Souza C D, Locatelli A, Mentes T O, Sala A, Buda-Prejbeanu L D, Klein O, Belmeguenai M, Roussigne Y, Stashkevich A, Cherif S M, Aballe L, Foerster M, Chshiev M, Auffret S, Miron I M, Gaudin G 2016 Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 449Google Scholar

    [31]

    Cheng X M, Keavney D J 2012 Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 026501Google Scholar

    [32]

    吴义政 2010 物理 39 406

    Wu Y Z 2010 Physics 39 406

    [33]

    Kuch W, Schneider C M 2001 Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 147Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kuch W, Gilles J, Kang S S, Imada S, Suga S, Kirschner J 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 3824

    [35]

    Kuch W, Dittschar A, Meinel K, Zharnikov M, Schneider C M, Kirschner J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 11621Google Scholar

    [36]

    Stöhr J 1999 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200 470Google Scholar

    [37]

    Andersson C, Sanyal B, Eriksson O, Nordstrom L, Karis O, Arvanitis D, Konishi T, Holub-Krappe E, Dunn J H 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 177207Google Scholar

    [38]

    Yu P, Lee J S, Okamoto S, Rossell M D, Huijben M, Yang C H, He Q, Zhang J X, Yang S Y, Lee M J, Ramasse Q M, Erni R, Chu Y H, Arena D A, Kao C C, Martin L W, Ramesh R 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 027201Google Scholar

    [39]

    Baruth A, Keavney D J, Burton J D, Janicka K, Tsymbal E Y, Yuan L, Liou S H, Adenwalla S 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 054419Google Scholar

    [40]

    Bernien M, Miguel J, Weis C, Ali M E, Kurde J, Krumme B, Panchmatia P M, Sanyal B, Piantek M, Srivastava P, Baberschke K, Oppeneer P M, Eriksson O, Kuch W, Wende H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 047202Google Scholar

    [41]

    Park J, An K, Hwang Y, Park J G, Noh H J, Kim J Y, Park J H, Hwang N M, Hyeon T 2004 Nat. Mater. 3 891Google Scholar

    [42]

    丁海峰, 董国胜, 金晓峰 1998 物理 27 621

    Ding H F, Dong G S, Jin X F 1998 Physics 27 621

    [43]

    Rampe A, Güntherodt G 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 14370Google Scholar

    [44]

    Marx G K L, Elmers H J, Schönhense G 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5888Google Scholar

    [45]

    Arenholz E, van der Laan G, Chopdekar R V, Suzuki Y 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 197201Google Scholar

    [46]

    Wu J, Choi J, Scholl A, Doran A, Arenholz E, Wu Y Z, Won C, Hwang C, Qiu Z Q 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 012409Google Scholar

    [47]

    Scholl A, Stöhr J, Lüning J, Seo J W, Fompeyrine J, Siegwart H, Locquet J P, Nolting F, Anders S, Fullerton E E, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A 2000 Science 287 1014Google Scholar

    [48]

    Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Anders S, Hillebrecht F U, Stöhr J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2878Google Scholar

    [49]

    Schwickert M M, Guo G Y, Tomaz M A, O’Brien W L, Harp G R 1998 Phys. Rev. B 58 4289Google Scholar

    [50]

    Wadley P, Howells B, Železný J, Andrews C, Hills V, Campion R P, Novák V, Olejník K, Maccherozzi F, Dhesi S S, Martin S Y, Wagner T, Wunderlich J, Freimuth F, Mokrousov Y, Kuneš J, Chauhan J S, Grzybowski M J, Rushforth A W, Edmonds K W, Gallagher B L, Jungwirth T 2016 Science 351 587Google Scholar

    [51]

    Sanchez-Barriga J, Varykhalov A, Springholz G, Steiner H, Kirchschlager R, Bauer G, Caha O, Schierle E, Weschke E, Unal A A, Valencia S, Dunst M, Braun J, Ebert H, Minar J, Golias E, Yashina L V, Ney A, Holy V, Rader O 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 10559Google Scholar

    [52]

    Rodríguez A F, Nolting F, Bansmann J, Kleibert A, Heyderman L J 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 316 426Google Scholar

    [53]

    Scholl A, Ohldag H, Nolting F, Stöhr J, Padmore H A 2002 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 1362Google Scholar

    [54]

    Marx G K L, Jubert P O, Bischof A, Allenspach R 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2925Google Scholar

    [55]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 237402Google Scholar

    [56]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T, Hosaka M, Katoh M 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 023907Google Scholar

    [57]

    Hild K, Maul J, Meng T, Kallmayer M, Schonhense G, Elmers H J, Ramos R, Arora S K, Shvets I V 2008 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20 235218Google Scholar

    [58]

    Hild K, Emmel J, Schönhense G, Elmers H J 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 224426Google Scholar

    [59]

    Nakagawa T, Watanabe K, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama T 2009 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21 314010Google Scholar

    [60]

    Kronseder M, Minár J, Braun J, Günther S, Woltersdorf G, Ebert H, Back C H 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 132404Google Scholar

    [61]

    Taniuchi T, Kotani Y, Shin S 2015 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86 023701Google Scholar

    [62]

    Michaelson H B 1977 J. Appl. Phys. 48 4729Google Scholar

    [63]

    Nakagawa T, Yokoyama T 2012 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 185 356Google Scholar

    [64]

    Nakagawa T, Yamamoto I, Takagi Y, Yokoyama T 2010 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 181 164Google Scholar

    [65]

    许祖彦 2009 中国激光 36 1619Google Scholar

    Xu Z Y 2009 Chin. J. Las. 36 1619Google Scholar

    [66]

    Chen C T, Lu J H, Togashi T, Suganuma T, Sekikawa T, Watanabe S, Xu Z Y, Wang J 2002 Opt. Lett. 27 637Google Scholar

    [67]

    宁艳晓, 傅强, 包信和 2016 物理化学学报 32 171Google Scholar

    Ning Y X, Fu Q, Bao X H 2016 Acta. Phys. Chim. Sin. 32 171Google Scholar

    [68]

    曹凝, 傅强, 包信和 2012 中国科学院院刊 27 103Google Scholar

    Cao N, Fu Q, Bao X H 2012 Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 27 103Google Scholar

    [69]

    Zhao Y C, Lyu H C, Yang G, Dong B W, Qi J, Zhang J Y, Zhu Z Z, Sun Y, Yu G H, Jiang Y, Wei H X, Wang J, Lu J, Wang Z H, Cai J W, Shen B G, Zhan W S, Yang F, Zhang S J, Wang S G 2019 Ultramicroscopy 202 156Google Scholar

    [70]

    Cui Y, Fu Q, Bao X 2010 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 5053Google Scholar

    [71]

    赵云驰 2019 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学院物理研究所)

    Zhao Y C 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Science) (in Chinese)

    [72]

    Yang G, Li D L, Wang S G, Ma Q L, Liang S H, Wei H X, Han X F, Hesjedal T, Ward R C C, Kohn A, Elkayam A, Tal N, Zhang X G 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 117 083904Google Scholar

    [73]

    Hopster H, Oepen H P 2005 Magnetic Microscopy of Nanostructures (Berlin: Springer) p138

    [74]

    Stöhr J, Scholl A, Regan T J, Anders S, Lüning J, Scheinfein M R, Padmore H A, White R L 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1862Google Scholar

    [75]

    Taniuchi T, Yasuhara R, Kumigashira H, Kubota M, Okazaki H, Wakita T, Yokoya T, Ono K, Oshima M, Lippmaa M, Kawasaki M, Koinuma H 2007 Surf. Sci. 601 4690Google Scholar

    [76]

    Schmidt T, Sala A, Marchetto H, Umbach E, Freund H J 2013 Ultramicroscopy 126 23Google Scholar

    [77]

    Sandig O, Herrero-Albillos J, Römer F M, Friedenberger N, Kurde J, Noll T, Farle M, Kronast F 2012 J. Electron. Spectrosc. 185 365Google Scholar

    [78]

    Lairson B M, Visokay M R, Sinclair R, Hagstrom S, Clemens B M 1992 Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 1390Google Scholar

    [79]

    Cillessen J F M, Wolf R M, d Leeuw D M 1993 Thin Solid Films 226 53Google Scholar

    [80]

    Nieuwenhuys B E, Sachtler W M H 1973 Surf. Sci. 34 317Google Scholar

    [81]

    Holcomb M B, Martin L W, Scholl A, He Q, Yu P, Yang C H, Yang S Y, Glans P A, Valvidares M, Huijben M, Kortright J B, Guo J, Chu Y H, Ramesh R 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 134406Google Scholar

    [82]

    Sander A, Christl M, Chiang C-T, Alexe M, Widdra W 2015 J. Appl. Phys. 118 224102Google Scholar

  • [1] Liu Ju, Cao Yi-Wei, Lv Quan-Jiang, Yang Tian-Peng, Mi Ting-Ting, Wang Xiao-Wen, Liu Jun-Lin. Influence of period number of superlattice electron barrier layer on the performance of AlGaN-based deep ultraviolet LED. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(12): 128503. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231969
    [2] Yang Dong, Li Zhong-Wen, Tian Yuan, Sun Shuai-Shuai, Tian Huan-Fang, Yang Huai-Xin, Li Jian-Qi. Photo-emission electron gun and electron optical simulation for ultrafast scanning electron microscope. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(22): 222901. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241245
    [3] Shi Liang-Zhu, Zhang Meng, Chu Yu-Xi, Liu Bo-Wen, Hu Ming-Lie. 206 nm deep ultraviolet laser generated from fifth harmonic of femtosecond fiber laser. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(22): 224209. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230877
    [4] Zhao Xiang-Yu, Qin Yu-Lu, Ji Bo-Yu, Lang Peng, Song Xiao-Wei, Lin Jing-Quan. Near-field imaging of femtosecond propagating surface plasmon and regulation of excitation efficiency. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10): 107101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201827
    [5] Ren Feng, Yin Sheng-Yi, Lu Zhi-Peng, Li Yang, Wang Yu, Zhang Shen-Jin, Yang Feng, Wei Dong. Applications of deep ultraviolet laser photo-and thermal-emission electron microscope in thermal dispenser cathode research. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(18): 187901. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.187901
    [6] Meng Xiang-Hao, Liu Hua-Gang, Huang Jian-Hong, Dai Shu-Tao, Deng Jing, Ruan Kai-Ming, Chen Jin-Ming, Lin Wen-Xiong. Tunable deep ultraviolet femtosecond sum frequency laser based on Ba1-xB2-y-zO4SixAlyGaz crystal. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(16): 164205. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.164205
    [7] WANG ZHEN-XIA, RUAN MEI-LING, YANG JIN-QING, WANG WEN-MIN, YU GUO-QING. INVESTIGATION OF THE NOVEL CARBON NANOSTRUCTURES BY HIGH RESOLUTION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1999, 48(11): 2092-2097. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.2092
    [8] WANG ZHEN-XIA, HU JUN, WANG WEN-MIN, YU GUO-QING, RUAN MEI-LING. A HIGH RESOLUTION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY INVESTIGATION OF CURVATURE IN MULTILAYER GRAPHITE SHEETS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1998, 47(11): 1853-1857. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1853
    [9] CAI QUN, M.S.ALTMAN. LEEM STUDIES OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL OXIDATION ON W(110) SURFACE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1997, 46(6): 1048-1054. doi: 10.7498/aps.46.1048
    [10] YANG CUI-YING, ZHANG DAO-FAN, WU XING, ZHOU YU-QING, FENG GUO-GUANG. ANALYTICAL ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF DEFECTS IN PHOTOREFRACTIVE BaTiO3 CRYSTAL. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(12): 2003-2007. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.2003
    [11] SHEN XIAO-QING. A STUDY ON IMAGE QUALITY DEPENDING ON DEFOCUSING HREM WITH IMAGE QUALIFICATION THEORY OF LINFOOT. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(3): 516-522. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.516
    [12] XU HUI-FANG, LUO GU-FENG, HU MEI-SHENG, CHEN JUN. HRTEM STUDY OF THE SUPERLATTICE ORTHOCLASE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(9): 1527-1529. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1527
    [13] ZHANG JING, LIU AN-SHENG, WU ZI-QIN, GUO KE-XIN. A TEM STUDY OF Pd-Si THIN FILM SOLID-PHASE REACTION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1986, 35(7): 965-968. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.965
    [14] WEN SHU-LIN, FENG JING-WEI. LATTICE DEFECTS IN α-Si3N4 STUDIED BY HREM. Acta Physica Sinica, 1985, 34(7): 951-955. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.951
    [15] LI FANG-HUA, FAN HAN-JIE, YANG DA-YU, FU PING-QIU, KONG YOU-HUA. ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF HUANGHOITE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1982, 31(5): 571-576. doi: 10.7498/aps.31.571
    [16] CHENG PENG-ZHU, MA XIAO-HUA, LUO QI-GUANG, YANG DA-YU. THE PREPARATION OF TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE SPECIMEN BY ELECTROLYTIC POLISHING METHOD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1981, 30(2): 286-290. doi: 10.7498/aps.30.286
    [17] GUO KE-XIN, LIN BAO-JUN. A TEM STUDY OF PARTIAL DISLOCATIONS IN A NICKEL-CHROMIUM ALLOY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1980, 29(4): 494-499. doi: 10.7498/aps.29.494
    [18] LI FANG-HUA, FAN HAI-FU. IMAGE DECONVOLUTION IN HIGH RESOLUTION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY BY MAKING USE OF SAYRE'S EQUATION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1979, 28(2): 276-278. doi: 10.7498/aps.28.276
    [19] Li Fang-hua. DETERMINATION OF CRYSTAL STRUCTURES BY HIGH RESOLUTION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY. Acta Physica Sinica, 1977, 26(3): 193-198. doi: 10.7498/aps.26.193
    [20] TSIEN LING-CHAO, HO SHOW-AN. THE GLIDE OF ALUMINIUM SINGLE CRYSTALS OBSERVED BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPE [Ⅱ]. Acta Physica Sinica, 1955, 11(3): 290-292. doi: 10.7498/aps.11.290
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  13414
  • PDF Downloads:  465
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  13 January 2020
  • Accepted Date:  14 February 2020
  • Published Online:  05 May 2020

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map