Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Quantum broadcasting multiple blind signature protocol based on three-particle partial entanglement

Zhang Wei Han Zheng-Fu

Citation:

Quantum broadcasting multiple blind signature protocol based on three-particle partial entanglement

Zhang Wei, Han Zheng-Fu
Article Text (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Recently, a quantum broadcasting multiple blind signature scheme based on GHZ state has been proposed, which could be used to settle the problem that a message is so important that it needs to be signed by multiple signatories, in order to guarantee the message privacy: none of signatories can acquire the content of the message they have signed. Maybe it can be applied to an E-bank system. For example, a large amount of money has to be transferred through E-bank system on the internet. The E-bank system operator submits the request to the bank after filling the application form including payment amount, bank transfer account and some other information. When the request arrives, the bank clerk signs to approve. However, it is not enough, it has to ask the manager for authority, and then it needs to be signed by the manager. In the whole process, all the signatories cannot learn what they have signed, but the application form has been recorded in the E-bank system. So, once disagreement takes place, the bank can track the message sender. In this paper, we present a new quantum broadcasting multiple blind signature scheme which is based on a three-particle partial entanglement state. Comparing with the original scheme, the partial entanglement state is utilized in our new scheme in place of the GHZ state, and this does not bring down the security of the scheme. Particularly, using the partial entanglement state can not only save the entanglement resource to some extent, but also make the scheme much easier to be realized. As is well known, It is not easy to keep the maximum entanglement state shared among the participants in the whole quantum communication process. By using the partial entanglement in place of the maximum entanglement can improve the new scheme applicability to make it more practical. It is also indicated that multi-qubit entangled systems which are partially entangled can be efficiently used as a resource in quantum information processing with perfect performance.
      Corresponding author: Zhang Wei, wzhang01@ustc.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11847083, 61602532), the Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province, China (Grant No. Qian-Ke-He-Jichu [2019]1296), the Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Fund of Education Department of Guizhou Province, China (Grant No. Qian Jiao He KY Zi [2018]426), the Industrial Technology Foundation of Qiannan State, China (Grant No. Qiannan Ke He Gong Zi (2017) 9 Hao), the Special Fund of Research and Innovation of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, China (Grant No. QNSY2018BS015), and the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, China (Grant No. QNSYRC201716).
    [1]

    Shor P W 1994 Proceeding of IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe NM USA, November 20―22, 1994 p124

    [2]

    Wallden P, Dunjko V, Kent A, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. A 91 042304

    [3]

    Amiri R, Andersson E 2015 Entropy 17 5635Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gottesman D, Chuang I 2001 arXiv:quant-ph/0105032v2

    [5]

    Zeng G, Keitel C 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 042312Google Scholar

    [6]

    Li Q, Chan W, Long D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 054307Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zou X, Qiu D 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 042325Google Scholar

    [8]

    Yin X, Ma W, Liu W 2012 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10 1250041Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang T, Wei Z 2012 Quantum Inf. Process. 11 455Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yang Y 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 415Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cao H, Huang J, Yu Y, et al. 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 3095Google Scholar

    [12]

    Xu G 2015 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 2605Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wen X, Tian Y, Ji L, et al. 2010 Phys. Scr. 81 055001Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wen X 2010 Phys. Scr. 82 065403Google Scholar

    [15]

    Xu R, Huang L, Yang W, et al. 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 3654Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhang K, Song T, Zuo H, et al. 2013 Phys. Scr. 87 045012Google Scholar

    [17]

    Xu G, Zhang K 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2577Google Scholar

    [18]

    Su Q, Huang Z, Wen Q, et al. 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4408Google Scholar

    [19]

    Yin X, Ma W, Liu W 2012 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51 455Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lin T, Chen Y, Chang T, et al. 2014 Proceeding of 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Nanotechnology Toronto Canada, August 18―21, 2014 p868

    [21]

    Shi W, Zhang J, Zhou Y, et al. 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3019Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wen X, Liu Y, Sun Y 2007 Z. Naturforsch. A 62 147

    [23]

    Wen X, Liu Y, Zhou N 2008 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 22 4251Google Scholar

    [24]

    Wen X, Niu X, Ji L, et al. 2009 Opt. Commun. 282 666Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xiao M, Li Z 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3841Google Scholar

    [26]

    Tian Y, Chen H, Ji S, et al. 2014 Opt. Quant. Electron. 46 769Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhang W, Qiu D, Zou X 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 2499Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tian Y, Chen H, Gao Y, et al. 2014 Int. J. Mod. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 33 1460369Google Scholar

    [29]

    Zhang W, Qiu D, Zou X, et al. 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 150Google Scholar

    [30]

    Kim T, Choi J, Jho N, et al. 2015 Phys. Scr. 90 025101Google Scholar

    [31]

    Yu C, Guo G, Lin S 2014 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57 2079Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kumar A, Adhikari S, Banerjee S, Roy S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 022307Google Scholar

  • 图 1  量子广播多重盲签名协议的图示

    Figure 1.  The graph of quantum broadcasting multiple blind signature scheme.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Shor P W 1994 Proceeding of IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Santa Fe NM USA, November 20―22, 1994 p124

    [2]

    Wallden P, Dunjko V, Kent A, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. A 91 042304

    [3]

    Amiri R, Andersson E 2015 Entropy 17 5635Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gottesman D, Chuang I 2001 arXiv:quant-ph/0105032v2

    [5]

    Zeng G, Keitel C 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 042312Google Scholar

    [6]

    Li Q, Chan W, Long D 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 054307Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zou X, Qiu D 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 042325Google Scholar

    [8]

    Yin X, Ma W, Liu W 2012 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 10 1250041Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wang T, Wei Z 2012 Quantum Inf. Process. 11 455Google Scholar

    [10]

    Yang Y 2008 Chin. Phys. B 17 415Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cao H, Huang J, Yu Y, et al. 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 3095Google Scholar

    [12]

    Xu G 2015 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54 2605Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wen X, Tian Y, Ji L, et al. 2010 Phys. Scr. 81 055001Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wen X 2010 Phys. Scr. 82 065403Google Scholar

    [15]

    Xu R, Huang L, Yang W, et al. 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 3654Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhang K, Song T, Zuo H, et al. 2013 Phys. Scr. 87 045012Google Scholar

    [17]

    Xu G, Zhang K 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 2577Google Scholar

    [18]

    Su Q, Huang Z, Wen Q, et al. 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 4408Google Scholar

    [19]

    Yin X, Ma W, Liu W 2012 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51 455Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lin T, Chen Y, Chang T, et al. 2014 Proceeding of 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Nanotechnology Toronto Canada, August 18―21, 2014 p868

    [21]

    Shi W, Zhang J, Zhou Y, et al. 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3019Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wen X, Liu Y, Sun Y 2007 Z. Naturforsch. A 62 147

    [23]

    Wen X, Liu Y, Zhou N 2008 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 22 4251Google Scholar

    [24]

    Wen X, Niu X, Ji L, et al. 2009 Opt. Commun. 282 666Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xiao M, Li Z 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 3841Google Scholar

    [26]

    Tian Y, Chen H, Ji S, et al. 2014 Opt. Quant. Electron. 46 769Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhang W, Qiu D, Zou X 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 2499Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tian Y, Chen H, Gao Y, et al. 2014 Int. J. Mod. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 33 1460369Google Scholar

    [29]

    Zhang W, Qiu D, Zou X, et al. 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 150Google Scholar

    [30]

    Kim T, Choi J, Jho N, et al. 2015 Phys. Scr. 90 025101Google Scholar

    [31]

    Yu C, Guo G, Lin S 2014 Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57 2079Google Scholar

    [32]

    Kumar A, Adhikari S, Banerjee S, Roy S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 022307Google Scholar

Metrics
  • Abstract views:  8214
  • PDF Downloads:  52
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  18 November 2018
  • Accepted Date:  18 January 2019
  • Available Online:  23 March 2019
  • Published Online:  05 April 2019

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map