搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于合成维度拓扑外尔点的波长选择热辐射超构表面

赖镇鑫 张也 仲帆 王强 肖彦玲 祝世宁 刘辉

引用本文:
Citation:

基于合成维度拓扑外尔点的波长选择热辐射超构表面

赖镇鑫, 张也, 仲帆, 王强, 肖彦玲, 祝世宁, 刘辉

Wavelength-selective thermal emission metasurfaces based on synthetic dimensional topological Weyl points

Lai Zhen-Xin, Zhang Ye, Zhong Fan, Wang Qiang, Xiao Yan-Ling, Zhu Shi-Ning, Liu Hui
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 黑体辐射通常具有覆盖整个红外波长范围的宽带光谱, 导致红外波段的大部分能量不能有效利用, 降低了辐射效率. 近年来, 具有二维亚波长人工纳米结构的超构表面因其在调节光学特性方面的灵活性而得到广泛研究, 这为调控热辐射提供了一个理想的平台. 在超构表面中, 采用合成维度方法为热辐射的精细调控开辟了新路径, 尤其突显了超越传统三维体系的物理特性和丰富的拓扑物理. 相比于在三维系统中探索物理现象, 研究一维或二维系统更为可行和高效. 合成维度的方法通过引入系统的结构或物理参数, 为操控光子系统中的内在自由度提供了可能性. 本文研究了利用合成维度方法实现波长选择热辐射. 首先在超晶格模型中构建合成拓扑外尔点, 通过角分辨热辐射谱(ARTES)对合成外尔锥进行实验表征, 在实现了合理的波长选择热辐射的同时能够尽可能地抑制其他波长的辐射, 对于实际的红外应用, 如热光伏和热管理装置, 是必不可少的.
    Blackbody emission such as the emission from incandescent sources usually possesses a broadband emission spectrum covering the whole infrared wavelength range. Most of emission energy goes into the unwanted infrared range and consequently causes low emission efficiency. Recently, metasurfaces with two-dimensional subwavelength artificial nanostructures have been widely studied due to their flexibility in modulating optical properties, thus providing an ideal platform for controlling thermal emission. The use of synthetic dimension methods in metasurfaces has opened up new avenues for fine-tuning thermal emission, especially highlighting the physical properties beyond traditional three-dimensional systems and rich topological physics. Although it is theoretically possible to explore physical phenomena through complete three-dimensional structures, such structures are difficult to construct in practice. In contrast, studying one-dimensional system or two-dimensional system is more feasible and efficient. The synthetic dimension approach introduces the possibility of manipulating intrinsic degrees of freedom in photon systems by introducing structural or physical parameters. In this work, we propose utilizing synthetic dimension methods to achieve wavelength-selective thermal emission. Firstly, we construct synthetic Weyl point in a superlattice model and validate it theoretically. Subsequently, experimental characterization of synthetic Weyl cones is conducted by using angle-resolved thermal emission spectroscopy (ARTES). The experimental results demonstrate that we can achieve reasonable wavelength-selective thermal emission while suppressing emission at other wavelengths as much as possible. This is essential for practical infrared applications such as thermalphotovoltaics and thermal management devices.
      通信作者: 刘辉, liuhui@nju.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 12334015, 92163216, 92150302, 62288101, 12004072)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Liu Hui, liuhui@nju.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12334015, 92163216, 92150302, 62288101, 12004072).
    [1]

    Chu Q Q, Zhong F, Shang X H, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2024 Nanophotonics 13 1279Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li A B, Singh S, Sievenpiper D 2018 Nanophotonics 7 989Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chen H T, Taylor A J, Yu N F 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 076401Google Scholar

    [4]

    Diem M, Koschny T, Soukoulis C M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 033101Google Scholar

    [5]

    Doiron C F, Naik G V 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1904154Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang X, Liu H, Zhang Z G, Wang Q, Zhu S N 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 41858Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhang X, Zhang Z G, Wang Q, Zhu S N, Liu H 2019 ACS Photonics 6 2671Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chu Q Q, Zhang F Y, Zhang Y, Qiao T, Zhu S N, Liu H 2022 Nanophotonics 11 4263Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chu Q Q, Zhang F Y, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2023 Opt. Express 31 39832Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhong F, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2021 Opt. Express 29 35216Google Scholar

    [11]

    Makhsiyan M, Bouchon P, Jaeck J, Pelouard J L, Haïder R 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 251103Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li J Y, Yu B W, Shen S 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 137401Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kudyshev Z A, Kildishev A V, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A 2020 Appl. Phys. Rev. 7 021407Google Scholar

    [14]

    Streyer W, Feng K, Zhong Y, Hoffman A J, Wasserman D 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 081105Google Scholar

    [15]

    Argyropoulos C, Le K Q, Mattiucci N, D'Aguanno G, Alù A 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 205112Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kong A, Cai B Y, Shi P, Yuan X C 2019 Opt. Express 27 30102Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu G Q, Liu X S, Chen J, Li Y Y, Shi L L, Fu G L, Liu Z Q 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 190 20Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen C, Liu Y H, Jiang Z Y, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhong F, Chen L S, Zhu S N, Liu H 2022 Opt. Express 30 13391Google Scholar

    [19]

    Xu C L, Qu S B, Pang Y Q, Wang J F, Yan M B, Zhang J Q, Wang Z L, Wang W J 2018 Infrared Phys. Technol. 88 133Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhou J R, Zhan Z G, Zhu F D, Han Y G 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 21629Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhu Y, Hou G Z, Wang Q Y, Zhu T, Sun T, Xu J, Chen K J 2022 Nanoscale 14 10816Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zou C J, Ren G H, Hossain M M, et al. 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1700460Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yuan L Q, Lin Q, Xiao M, Fan S H 2018 Optica 5 1396Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu H, Yan Z W, Xiao M, Zhu S N 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0123002Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang S C, Hu J P 2001 Science 294 823Google Scholar

    [26]

    Qi X L, Hughes T L, Zhang S C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 159901Google Scholar

    [27]

    Ozawa T, Price H M, Amo A, Goldman N, Hafezi M, Lu L, Rechtsman M C, Schuster D, Simon J, Zilberberg O, Carusotto I 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 015006Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tang G J, He X T, Shi F L, Liu J W, Chen X D, Dong J W 2022 Laser Photon. Rev. 16 2100300Google Scholar

    [29]

    Kraus Y E, Zilberberg O 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 116404Google Scholar

    [30]

    Mei F, Zhu S L, Zhang Z M, Oh C H, Goldman N 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013638Google Scholar

    [31]

    Tsomokos D I, Ashhab S, Nori F 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 052311Google Scholar

    [32]

    Yuan L Q, Fan S H 2016 Optica 3 1014Google Scholar

    [33]

    Cheng D L, Lustig E, Wang K, Fan S H 2023 Light-Sci. Appl. 12 158Google Scholar

    [34]

    Englebert N, Goldman N, Erkintalo M, Mostaan N, Gorza S P, Leo F, Fatome J 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 1014Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang B, Chen T, Zhang X D 2019 Annual Conference of Chinese-Society-of-Optical-Engineering(CSOE)-Quantum Information Technology (AOPC) Beijing, China, July 07–09, 2019

    [36]

    Cardano F, D'Errico A, Dauphin A, Maffei M, Piccirillo B, de Lisio C, De Filippis G, Cataudella V, Santamato E, Marrucci L, Lewenstein M, Massignan P 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15516Google Scholar

    [37]

    Yang M, Zhang H Q, Liu Z H, Zhou Z W, Zhou X X, Xu J S, Han Y J, Li C F, Guo G C 2023 Sci. Adv. 9 eabp8943Google Scholar

    [38]

    Bell B A, Wang K, Solntsev A S, Neshev D N, Sukhorukov A A, Eggleton B J 2017 Optica 4 1433Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhang F X, Feng Y M, Chen X F, Ge L, Wan W J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 053901Google Scholar

    [40]

    Liu J J, Li Z W, Chen Z G, Tang W Y, Chen A, Liang B, Ma G C, Cheng J C 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 084301Google Scholar

    [41]

    Wang Q, Xiao M, Liu H, Zhu S N, Chan C T 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 031032

    [42]

    Yan Z W, Wang Q, Xiao M, Zhao Y L, Zhu S N, Liu H 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 013901Google Scholar

    [43]

    Song W E, Wu S J, Chen C, Chen Y X, Huang C Y, Yuan L Q, Zhu S N, Li T 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 043803Google Scholar

    [44]

    Fan X Y, Xia T Z, Qiu H H, Zhang Q C, Qiu C Y 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 216403Google Scholar

    [45]

    Deng W M, Chen Z M, Li M Y, Guo C H, Tian Z T, Sun K X, Chen X D, Chen W J, Dong J W 2022 Light-Sci. Appl. 11 134Google Scholar

    [46]

    Xia S, Lei S, Song D, Lauro L D, Alamgir I, Tang L, Xu J, Morandotti R, Buljan H, Chen Z J A P 2024 Adv. Photon. 6 026005Google Scholar

    [47]

    Yang B, Guo Q H, Tremain B, Liu R J, Barr L E, Yan Q H, Gao W L, Liu H C, Xiang Y J, Chen J, Fang C, Hibbins A, Lu L, Zhang S 2018 Science 359 1013Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang Q, Ding K, Liu H, Zhu S N, Chan C T 2020 Opt. Express 28 1758Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zhong F, Ding K, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Chan C T, Liu H 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 014071Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)超晶格的结构示意图; (b)参数为(p, q) = (0, 0)的实验样品对应的SEM扫描图; (c)不同参数下的超晶格色散, 红色虚线标出了超晶格的第一布里渊区边界, 蓝色实线和青色虚线代表参数设置为(p, q)=(0, 0)时的色散曲线, 青色虚线是由于人工加倍原胞周期而产生的能带折叠现象, 黑色虚线是参数(p, q) = (0, 0.2)对应的色散; (d)合成空间中的外尔锥, 紫色虚线是参数空间中对应$ {p}^{2}+{q}^{2}=0.{2}^{2} $的回路, 紫红色圆点是已表征的实验数据点

    Fig. 1.  (a) Schematic structure of the superlattice; (b) SEM picture corresponding to the experimental sample with the parameter (p, q) = (0, 0); (c) dispersion of the superlattice with different parameters, the red dashed line marks the boundary of the first Brillouin zone of the superlattice, the blue solid line and cyan dashed line represent the dispersion curves when the parameter is set to (p, q) = (0, 0), and the folding of the bands resulting from the artificial doubling of the unitcell period is marked by the cyan dashed line, and the black dashed line is the dispersion corresponding to the parameter (p, q) = (0, 0.2); (d) Weyl cones in the synthetic space, the purple dashed line is the loop in the parameter space corresponding to $ {p}^{2}+{q}^{2}=0.{2}^{2} $, and the fuchsia dots are the experimental data points that have been characterized.

    图 2  (a) ARTES测量装置及测量光路图; 由FDTD solutions计算的超晶格吸收谱(b)—(d)以及由ARTES测量的样品热辐射谱(e)—(g); (b), (e) 合成参数$ \left(p, q\right)=\left(0, 0\right) $; (c), (f)合成参数$ \theta =\pi /6 $; (d), (g) 合成参数$ \theta =\pi /3 $, 图片右边的颜色棒代表归一化吸收/辐射强度, 图中的暗红色实线来自COMSOL的仿真结果

    Fig. 2.  (a) ARTES measurement device and measurement optical path diagrams. The superlattice absorption spectra (b)–(d) calculated by FDTD and the thermal emission spectra (e)–(g) of the sample measured by ARTES: (b), (e) Correspond to the synthesis parameter (p, q) = (0, 0); (c), (f) correspond to the synthesis parameter θ = π/6; (d), (g) correspond to the synthesis parameter θ = π/3; colorbar on the right side of the picture represents the normalized absorbed/radiated intensity, and the dark red solid line in the diagram is from the COMSOL multiphysics simulation results.

    图 3  不同参数下的热辐射谱 (a)热辐射角$ \alpha =35^\circ $时, 不同$ \theta $角对应的热辐射谱; (b) 热辐射角$ \alpha =35^\circ $时, $ \theta ={\mathrm{\pi }}/3 $对应的热辐射谱; (c)热辐射角$ \theta ={\mathrm{\pi }}/6 $时, 不同$ \alpha $角对应的热辐射谱; (d) 热辐射角$ \theta ={\mathrm{\pi }}/6 $时, $ \alpha =20^\circ $对应的热辐射谱

    Fig. 3.  Thermal emission spectra with different parameters: (a) Thermal emission spectrum for different θ at thermal emission angle α = 35°; (b) thermal emission spectrum corresponding to θ = π/3 at thermal emission angle α = 35°; (c) thermal emission spectrum corresponding to θ = π/6 at different thermal emission angle α; (d) thermal emission spectrum corresponding to α = 20° for thermal emission angle θ = π/6

    图 B1  合成角度θ = π/6, 当波矢为 (a) kx = 0.2k0, (b) kx = 0.4k0时高频率本征模式的模场分布以及当波矢为(c) kx = 0.2k0, (d) kx = 0.4k0时低频率本征模式的模场分布; (e) 合成角度θ = π/6时高频率色散对应的TE模式的远场辐射强度; (f) 合成角度θ = π/6时低频率色散对应的TE模式的远场辐射强度

    Fig. B1.  Mode-field distributions of the high-frequency eigenmodes at synthetic angle θ = π/6 when the wave vectors are (a) kx = 0.2k0, (b) kx = 0.4k0 and the low-frequency eigenmodes when the wave vectors are (c) kx = 0.2k0, (d) kx = 0.4k0; (e) the far-field radiation intensity of the TE modes corresponding to the high-frequency dispersion at synthetic angle θ = π/6; (f) the far-field radiation intensity of the TE mode corresponding to the low-frequency dispersion at synthetic angle θ = π/6.

    图 A1  由FDTD计算的超晶格吸收谱(a), (b)以及由ARTES测量的样品热辐射谱(c), (d); (a), (c) 合成参数$ \theta =0 $; (b), (d) 合成参数$ \theta ={\mathrm{\pi }}/2 $; 图片右边的颜色棒代表归一化吸收/辐射强度, 图中的暗红色实线来自COMSOL的仿真结果

    Fig. A1.  Superlattice absorption spectra (a), (b) calculated by FDTD and thermal emission spectra (c), (d) of the sample measured by ARTES: (a), (c) Synthesis parameter θ = 0; (b), (d) synthesis parameter θ = π/2; colorbar on the right side of the picture represents normalized absorption/emission intensity, and the dark-red solid line in the picture is from COMSOL simulation result.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Chu Q Q, Zhong F, Shang X H, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2024 Nanophotonics 13 1279Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li A B, Singh S, Sievenpiper D 2018 Nanophotonics 7 989Google Scholar

    [3]

    Chen H T, Taylor A J, Yu N F 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 076401Google Scholar

    [4]

    Diem M, Koschny T, Soukoulis C M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 033101Google Scholar

    [5]

    Doiron C F, Naik G V 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1904154Google Scholar

    [6]

    Zhang X, Liu H, Zhang Z G, Wang Q, Zhu S N 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 41858Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhang X, Zhang Z G, Wang Q, Zhu S N, Liu H 2019 ACS Photonics 6 2671Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chu Q Q, Zhang F Y, Zhang Y, Qiao T, Zhu S N, Liu H 2022 Nanophotonics 11 4263Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chu Q Q, Zhang F Y, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2023 Opt. Express 31 39832Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhong F, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Liu H 2021 Opt. Express 29 35216Google Scholar

    [11]

    Makhsiyan M, Bouchon P, Jaeck J, Pelouard J L, Haïder R 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 251103Google Scholar

    [12]

    Li J Y, Yu B W, Shen S 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 137401Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kudyshev Z A, Kildishev A V, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A 2020 Appl. Phys. Rev. 7 021407Google Scholar

    [14]

    Streyer W, Feng K, Zhong Y, Hoffman A J, Wasserman D 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 081105Google Scholar

    [15]

    Argyropoulos C, Le K Q, Mattiucci N, D'Aguanno G, Alù A 2013 Phys. Rev. B 87 205112Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kong A, Cai B Y, Shi P, Yuan X C 2019 Opt. Express 27 30102Google Scholar

    [17]

    Liu G Q, Liu X S, Chen J, Li Y Y, Shi L L, Fu G L, Liu Z Q 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 190 20Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen C, Liu Y H, Jiang Z Y, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhong F, Chen L S, Zhu S N, Liu H 2022 Opt. Express 30 13391Google Scholar

    [19]

    Xu C L, Qu S B, Pang Y Q, Wang J F, Yan M B, Zhang J Q, Wang Z L, Wang W J 2018 Infrared Phys. Technol. 88 133Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zhou J R, Zhan Z G, Zhu F D, Han Y G 2023 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15 21629Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhu Y, Hou G Z, Wang Q Y, Zhu T, Sun T, Xu J, Chen K J 2022 Nanoscale 14 10816Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zou C J, Ren G H, Hossain M M, et al. 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1700460Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yuan L Q, Lin Q, Xiao M, Fan S H 2018 Optica 5 1396Google Scholar

    [24]

    Liu H, Yan Z W, Xiao M, Zhu S N 2021 Acta Opt. Sin. 41 0123002Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang S C, Hu J P 2001 Science 294 823Google Scholar

    [26]

    Qi X L, Hughes T L, Zhang S C 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 159901Google Scholar

    [27]

    Ozawa T, Price H M, Amo A, Goldman N, Hafezi M, Lu L, Rechtsman M C, Schuster D, Simon J, Zilberberg O, Carusotto I 2019 Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 015006Google Scholar

    [28]

    Tang G J, He X T, Shi F L, Liu J W, Chen X D, Dong J W 2022 Laser Photon. Rev. 16 2100300Google Scholar

    [29]

    Kraus Y E, Zilberberg O 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 116404Google Scholar

    [30]

    Mei F, Zhu S L, Zhang Z M, Oh C H, Goldman N 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 013638Google Scholar

    [31]

    Tsomokos D I, Ashhab S, Nori F 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 052311Google Scholar

    [32]

    Yuan L Q, Fan S H 2016 Optica 3 1014Google Scholar

    [33]

    Cheng D L, Lustig E, Wang K, Fan S H 2023 Light-Sci. Appl. 12 158Google Scholar

    [34]

    Englebert N, Goldman N, Erkintalo M, Mostaan N, Gorza S P, Leo F, Fatome J 2023 Nat. Phys. 19 1014Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang B, Chen T, Zhang X D 2019 Annual Conference of Chinese-Society-of-Optical-Engineering(CSOE)-Quantum Information Technology (AOPC) Beijing, China, July 07–09, 2019

    [36]

    Cardano F, D'Errico A, Dauphin A, Maffei M, Piccirillo B, de Lisio C, De Filippis G, Cataudella V, Santamato E, Marrucci L, Lewenstein M, Massignan P 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15516Google Scholar

    [37]

    Yang M, Zhang H Q, Liu Z H, Zhou Z W, Zhou X X, Xu J S, Han Y J, Li C F, Guo G C 2023 Sci. Adv. 9 eabp8943Google Scholar

    [38]

    Bell B A, Wang K, Solntsev A S, Neshev D N, Sukhorukov A A, Eggleton B J 2017 Optica 4 1433Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhang F X, Feng Y M, Chen X F, Ge L, Wan W J 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 053901Google Scholar

    [40]

    Liu J J, Li Z W, Chen Z G, Tang W Y, Chen A, Liang B, Ma G C, Cheng J C 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 084301Google Scholar

    [41]

    Wang Q, Xiao M, Liu H, Zhu S N, Chan C T 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 031032

    [42]

    Yan Z W, Wang Q, Xiao M, Zhao Y L, Zhu S N, Liu H 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 013901Google Scholar

    [43]

    Song W E, Wu S J, Chen C, Chen Y X, Huang C Y, Yuan L Q, Zhu S N, Li T 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 043803Google Scholar

    [44]

    Fan X Y, Xia T Z, Qiu H H, Zhang Q C, Qiu C Y 2022 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 216403Google Scholar

    [45]

    Deng W M, Chen Z M, Li M Y, Guo C H, Tian Z T, Sun K X, Chen X D, Chen W J, Dong J W 2022 Light-Sci. Appl. 11 134Google Scholar

    [46]

    Xia S, Lei S, Song D, Lauro L D, Alamgir I, Tang L, Xu J, Morandotti R, Buljan H, Chen Z J A P 2024 Adv. Photon. 6 026005Google Scholar

    [47]

    Yang B, Guo Q H, Tremain B, Liu R J, Barr L E, Yan Q H, Gao W L, Liu H C, Xiang Y J, Chen J, Fang C, Hibbins A, Lu L, Zhang S 2018 Science 359 1013Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang Q, Ding K, Liu H, Zhu S N, Chan C T 2020 Opt. Express 28 1758Google Scholar

    [49]

    Zhong F, Ding K, Zhang Y, Zhu S N, Chan C T, Liu H 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 014071Google Scholar

  • [1] 曹文彧, 张雅婷, 魏彦锋, 朱丽娟, 徐可, 颜家圣, 周书星, 胡晓东. 超晶格插入层对InGaN/GaN多量子阱的应变调制作用.  , 2024, 73(7): 077201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231677
    [2] 王继光, 李珑玲, 邱嘉图, 陈许敏, 曹东兴. 钙钛矿超晶格材料界面二维电子气的调控.  , 2023, 72(17): 176801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230573
    [3] 房晓南, 危芹, 隋娜娜, 孔志勇, 刘静, 杜颜伶. 间隔层调控SrVO3/SrTiO3超晶格铁磁半金属-铁磁绝缘体转变.  , 2022, 71(23): 237301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221765
    [4] 魏浩铭, 张颖, 张宙, 吴仰晴, 曹丙强. 极性补偿对LaMnO3/LaNiO3超晶格交换偏置场强度的影响.  , 2022, 71(15): 156801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220365
    [5] 刘英光, 任国梁, 郝将帅, 张静文, 薛新强. 含有倾斜界面硅/锗超晶格的导热性能.  , 2021, 70(11): 113101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201807
    [6] 刘英光, 郝将帅, 任国梁, 张静文. 不同周期结构硅锗超晶格导热性能研究.  , 2021, 70(7): 073101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201789
    [7] 刘延飞, 陈诚, 杨东东, 李修建. 基于GaAs/Al0.45Ga0.55As超晶格芯片自发混沌振荡的8 Gb/s物理真随机数实现.  , 2020, 69(10): 100504. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200136
    [8] 李婷, 卢晓同, 张强, 孔德欢, 王叶兵, 常宏. 锶原子光晶格钟黑体辐射频移评估.  , 2019, 68(9): 093701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182294
    [9] 李柱松, 朱泰山. 超晶格和层状结构传热特性的连续模型及其在能源材料设计中的应用.  , 2016, 65(11): 116802. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.116802
    [10] 李勇峰, 张介秋, 屈绍波, 王甲富, 吴翔, 徐卓, 张安学. 圆极化波反射聚焦超表面.  , 2015, 64(12): 124102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.124102
    [11] 王长, 曹俊诚. 太赫兹场和倾斜磁场对超晶格电子动力学特性调控规律研究.  , 2015, 64(9): 090502. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.090502
    [12] 罗晓华. Schrödinger方程的一般解与超晶格多量子阱的电子跃迁.  , 2014, 63(1): 017302. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.017302
    [13] 罗晓华, 何为, 吴木营, 罗诗裕. 准周期激励与应变超晶格的动力学稳定性.  , 2013, 62(24): 247301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.247301
    [14] 冯现徉, 逯瑶, 蒋雷, 张国莲, 张昌文, 王培吉. In掺杂ZnO超晶格光学性质的研究.  , 2012, 61(5): 057101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.057101
    [15] 尚杰, 张辉, 曹明刚, 张鹏翔. 氧压对Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3薄膜晶格常数的影响及BaTiO3/Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3超晶格的制备.  , 2011, 60(1): 016802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.016802
    [16] 蒋雷, 王培吉, 张昌文, 冯现徉, 逯瑶, 张国莲. 超晶格SnO2掺Cr的电子结构和光学性质的研究.  , 2011, 60(9): 093101. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.093101
    [17] 李志华, 王文新, 刘林生, 蒋中伟, 高汉超, 周均铭. As保护下的生长中断时间对AlSb/InAs超晶格界面粗糙度的影响.  , 2007, 56(3): 1785-1789. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1785
    [18] 邓成良, 邵明珠, 罗诗裕. 带电粒子同超晶格的相互作用与系统的混沌行为.  , 2006, 55(5): 2422-2426. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2422
    [19] 顾培夫, 陈海星, 秦小芸, 刘 旭. 基于薄膜光子晶体超晶格理论的偏振带通滤波器.  , 2005, 54(2): 773-776. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.773
    [20] 张启义, 田强. 超晶格中电场单极畴与偶极畴的形成和输运.  , 2002, 51(8): 1804-1807. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1804
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1750
  • PDF下载量:  187
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-04-12
  • 修回日期:  2024-05-14
  • 上网日期:  2024-05-17
  • 刊出日期:  2024-06-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map