搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

反应等离子体沉积二氧化锡电子传输层及其在钙钛矿太阳电池中的应用

韩晓静 杨静 张佳莉 刘冬雪 石标 王鹏阳 赵颖 张晓丹

引用本文:
Citation:

反应等离子体沉积二氧化锡电子传输层及其在钙钛矿太阳电池中的应用

韩晓静, 杨静, 张佳莉, 刘冬雪, 石标, 王鹏阳, 赵颖, 张晓丹

Electron transport layer of tin dioxide deposited by reactive plasma and its application in perovskite solar cells

Han Xiao-Jing, Yang Jing, Zhang Jia-Li, Liu Dong-Xue, Shi Biao, Wang Peng-Yang, Zhao Ying, Zhang Xiao-Dan
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 电子传输层对于钙钛矿太阳电池的光电转换效率和稳定性十分重要, 二氧化锡是高效钙钛矿太阳电池中常见的电子传输层, 具有良好的载流子提取和传输能力, 但是基于溶液法制备二氧化锡在空气中高温退火时表面产生大量缺陷, 降低薄膜的电学性能, 而且溶液法不利于大面积制备. 本文采用反应等离子体沉积法制备二氧化锡薄膜, 通过调控辉光时间和工作电流优化薄膜性能, 将其应用于小面积正式钙钛矿太阳电池中, 实现了21.24%的效率. 另外, 通过引入异辛酸亚锡和二氧化锡结合作为双电子传输层改善器件的迟滞, 电池开路电压从1.11 V提高到1.15 V, 效率从21.27%提升至22.15%, 迟滞因子从24.04%降低到3.69%. 本工作开发了新的制备方法和有效的优化策略来制备二氧化锡电子传输层, 推动了平面异质结钙钛矿太阳电池的发展, 为制备高效、稳定的钙钛矿太阳电池提供了新的研究思路和方法.
    The electron transport layer is very important for the device efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells. Tin dioxide is a common electron transport layer in high-efficiency solar cells and has good carrier extraction and transport capability. However, using the solution method to prepare tin dioxide, a large number of defects are generated on its surface during high-temperature annealing in air, which can degrade the electrical properties of the film, so the solution method is not conducive to preparing large-area film. In this paper, the reactive plasma deposition method is used to prepare tin dioxide thin film, and the performance of the thin film is optimized by adjusting the glow discharge time and working current. The film is applied to small-area N-I-P type perovskite solar cells, the efficiency reaching to 21.24%. The hysteresis of the device is improved by introducing stannous isooctanoate and tin dioxide as a double electron transport layer, the open circuit voltage of the solar cell increases from 1.11 to 1.15 V, the efficiency rises from 21.27% to 22.15%, and the hysteresis factor decreases from 24.04% to 3.69%. This work presents a new preparation method and effective optimization strategy to prepare tin dioxide electron transport layer, which will promote the development of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells and provide a new research idea for preparing high-efficiency and stable perovskite solar cells.
      通信作者: 刘冬雪, liu_dongxue@ctg.com.cn ; 石标, Biaos_xiaog@163.com
    • 基金项目: 中国长江三峡集团有限公司科研项目(批准号: 202103571)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 62274099)和国家自然科学基金联合基金重点项目(批准号: U21A2072)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Liu Dong-Xue, liu_dongxue@ctg.com.cn ; Shi Biao, Biaos_xiaog@163.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the Scientific Research Project of China Three Gorges Corporation (Grant No. 202103571), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62274099), and the Key Program of Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U21A2072).
    [1]

    Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jeong J, Kim M, Seo J, et al. 2021 Nature 592 381Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jiang Q, Tong J, Xian Y, et al. 2022 Nature 611 278Google Scholar

    [4]

    Best research-cell efficiencies https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. [2023-6-1]

    [5]

    Roose B, Baena J P C, Gödel K C, Graetzel M, Hagfeldt A, Steiner U, Abate A 2016 Nano Energy 30 517Google Scholar

    [6]

    Jiang Q, Zhang X W, You J B 2018 Small 14 1801154Google Scholar

    [7]

    Min H, Lee D Y, Kim J, et al. 2021 Nature 598 444Google Scholar

    [8]

    Park S Y, Zhu K 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2110438Google Scholar

    [9]

    Shi L, Lin H 2011 Langmuir 27 3977Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xi J, Wu Z, Jiao B, et al. 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1606964Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yang D, Yang R, Wang K, Wu C, Zhu X, Feng J, Ren X, Fang G, Priya S, Liu S 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3239Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang F, Liu J, Wang X, et al. 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 15680Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang F, Yang M, Zhang Y, Yang L, Fan L, Lv S, Liu X, Han D, Yang J 2019 Adv. Sci. 6 1801170Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dong Q, Zhu C, Chen M, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 973Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sun Y F, Liu S B, Meng F L, Liu J Y, Jin Z, Kong L T, Liu J H 2012 Sensors (Basel) 12 2610Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kozhushner M A, Bodneva V L, Oleynik I I, Belysheva T V, Ikim M I, Trakhtenberg L I 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 6940Google Scholar

    [17]

    Ma J, Zheng X, Lei H, Ke W, Chen C, Chen Z, Yang G, Fang G 2017 Sol. RRL 1 1700118Google Scholar

    [18]

    Guo Y, Yin X, Liu J, Chen W, Wen S, Que M, Xie H, Yang Y, Que W, Gao B 2019 Org. Electron. 65 207Google Scholar

    [19]

    Bai G, Wu Z, Li J, Bu T, Li W, Li W, Huang F, Zhang Q, Cheng Y B, Zhong J 2019 Sol. Energy 183 306Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zimmermann I, Provost M, Mejaouri S, Al Atem M, Blaizot A, Duchatelet A, Collin S, Rousset J 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 11636Google Scholar

    [21]

    Porte Y, Maller R, Faber H, AlShareef H N, Anthopoulos T D, McLachlan M A 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 758Google Scholar

    [22]

    杜荣池, 王广才, 张晓丹, 张迎春, 赵颖 2017 真空与低温 23 136Google Scholar

    Du R C, Wang G C, Zhang X D, Zhang Y C, Zhao Y 2017 Vacuum and Cryogenics 23 136Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li F, Shen Z, Weng Y, Lou Q, Chen C, Shen L, Guo W, Li G 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2004933Google Scholar

    [24]

    Le Corre V M, Duijnstee E A, El Tambouli O, Ball J M, Snaith H J, Lim J, Koster L J A 2021 ACS Energy Lett. 6 1087Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) 基于不同厚度RPD-SnO2薄膜的钙钛矿太阳电池的最佳J-V曲线; (b) 基于厚度分别为12.43, 17.91和27.82 nm的RPD-SnO2薄膜的钙钛矿太阳电池的EQE和积分电流曲线

    Fig. 1.  (a) Optimum J-V curves of perovskite solar cells based on RPD-SnO2 films with different thicknesses; (b) EQE and integrated current density curves of perovskite solar cells based on RPD-SnO2 films with thicknesses of 12.43, 17.91 and 27.82 nm.

    图 2  (a) 不同工作电流下制备的SnO2薄膜的厚度和生长速率; (b) 不同工作电流下制备的SnO2薄膜的光学透过率; (c) 不同工作电流下制备的SnO2薄膜的吸收光谱, 插图为通过吸收光谱得到的Tauc图

    Fig. 2.  (a) Thickness and growth rate of SnO2 films prepared under different working currents; (b) optical transmittance of SnO2 thin films prepared under different working currents; (c) absorption spectra of SnO2 thin films prepared under different working currents, the inset is the Tauc diagram obtained from the absorption spectra.

    图 3  (a) 不同工作电流下制备的SnO2薄膜的电导率; 基于不同工作电流下制备的SnO2作为衬底的钙钛矿的(b) PL光谱和(c) TRPL光谱

    Fig. 3.  (a) Conductivity of SnO2 thin films prepared under different working currents; (b) PL and (c) TRPL spectra of perovskite based SnO2 substrate prepared under different working currents.

    图 4  沉积在不同工作电流的SnO2上的钙钛矿的AFM图 (a) 30 A; (b) 25 A; (c) 20 A

    Fig. 4.  AFM images of perovskite deposited on SnO2 under different working currents (a) 30 A; (b) 25 A; (c) 20 A.

    图 5  (a) 基于不同工作电流下制备的SnO2薄膜的器件最佳J-V曲线; (b) EQE和积分电流密度曲线; (c) 基于25 A-SnO2的钙钛矿太阳电池的J-V曲线

    Fig. 5.  (a) Optimal J-V curves of devices based on SnO2 thin films prepared under different working currents; (b) EQE and integrated current density curves; (c) J-V curves of perovskite solar cells based on 25 A-SnO2.

    图 6  (a) RPD-SnO2和RPD-SnO2+CSCO的Tauc图; (b) RPD-SnO2和RPD-SnO2+CSCO的起始能量的UPS扫描以及截止能量边; (c) RPD-SnO2和RPD-SnO2+CSCO的能带结构示意图

    Fig. 6.  (a) UPS scans of onset energy and cutoff energy edges of RPD-SnO2 and RPD-SnO2+CSCO; (b) Tauc plots of RPD-SnO2 and RPD-SnO2+CSCO; (c) schematic diagram of energy band structures of RPD-SnO2 and RPD-SnO2+CSCO.

    图 7  (a) 不同ETLs制备的器件反向和正向扫描J-V曲线; (b) 对应器件的EQE和积分电流密度曲线; (c) 基于ITO/ETLs/FA1–xMAxPbI3/PCBM/Au结构的纯电子器件的SCLC; (d) 从 15个器件获得的迟滞系数箱体图

    Fig. 7.  (a) Reverse and forward scan J-V curves of devices prepared by different ETLs; (b) EQE and integrated current density curves of corresponding devices; (c) SCLC of pure electrons devices based on ITO/ETLs/FA1–xMAxPbI3/PCBM/Au structure; (d) hysteresis coefficient box plot obtained from 15 devices.

    图 8  基于RPD-SnO2和RPD-SnO2+CSCO作为电子传输层的钙钛矿太阳电池的稳态输出电流密度和对应的器件效率

    Fig. 8.  Steady-state output current density and corresponding device efficiency of perovskite solar cells based on RPD-SnO2 and RPD-SnO2 + CSCO as the electron transport layer.

    表 1  使用双指数函数拟合基于不同工作电流制备的SnO2作为衬底的钙钛矿的TPRL曲线参数

    Table 1.  Parameters of TPRL curves of perovskite based SnO2 substrate prepared under different working currents fitted by double exponential function.

    SamplesA1$ {\tau }_{1} $/nsA2$ {\tau }_{2} $/ns
    RPD-30 A-SnO2664.4244.501249.27172.17
    RPD-25 A-SnO2747.3836.521120.05198.19
    RPD-20 A- SnO2689.0537.831193.30164.57
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  基于不同ETLs的钙钛矿太阳电池的最佳器件性能参数

    Table 2.  Optimal device performance parameters for perovskite solar cells based on different ETLs.

    DeviceJSC/(mA·cm–2)VOC/mVFF/%PCE/%Integrated JSC/(mA·cm–2)
    RPD-SnO223.36111281.8521.2724.07
    CSCO23.21114781.1321.6124.37
    RPD-SnO2+CSCO23.91114780.7222.1524.67
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050Google Scholar

    [2]

    Jeong J, Kim M, Seo J, et al. 2021 Nature 592 381Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jiang Q, Tong J, Xian Y, et al. 2022 Nature 611 278Google Scholar

    [4]

    Best research-cell efficiencies https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. [2023-6-1]

    [5]

    Roose B, Baena J P C, Gödel K C, Graetzel M, Hagfeldt A, Steiner U, Abate A 2016 Nano Energy 30 517Google Scholar

    [6]

    Jiang Q, Zhang X W, You J B 2018 Small 14 1801154Google Scholar

    [7]

    Min H, Lee D Y, Kim J, et al. 2021 Nature 598 444Google Scholar

    [8]

    Park S Y, Zhu K 2022 Adv. Mater. 34 2110438Google Scholar

    [9]

    Shi L, Lin H 2011 Langmuir 27 3977Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xi J, Wu Z, Jiao B, et al. 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1606964Google Scholar

    [11]

    Yang D, Yang R, Wang K, Wu C, Zhu X, Feng J, Ren X, Fang G, Priya S, Liu S 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 3239Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yang F, Liu J, Wang X, et al. 2019 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 15680Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wang F, Yang M, Zhang Y, Yang L, Fan L, Lv S, Liu X, Han D, Yang J 2019 Adv. Sci. 6 1801170Google Scholar

    [14]

    Dong Q, Zhu C, Chen M, et al. 2021 Nat. Commun. 12 973Google Scholar

    [15]

    Sun Y F, Liu S B, Meng F L, Liu J Y, Jin Z, Kong L T, Liu J H 2012 Sensors (Basel) 12 2610Google Scholar

    [16]

    Kozhushner M A, Bodneva V L, Oleynik I I, Belysheva T V, Ikim M I, Trakhtenberg L I 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121 6940Google Scholar

    [17]

    Ma J, Zheng X, Lei H, Ke W, Chen C, Chen Z, Yang G, Fang G 2017 Sol. RRL 1 1700118Google Scholar

    [18]

    Guo Y, Yin X, Liu J, Chen W, Wen S, Que M, Xie H, Yang Y, Que W, Gao B 2019 Org. Electron. 65 207Google Scholar

    [19]

    Bai G, Wu Z, Li J, Bu T, Li W, Li W, Huang F, Zhang Q, Cheng Y B, Zhong J 2019 Sol. Energy 183 306Google Scholar

    [20]

    Zimmermann I, Provost M, Mejaouri S, Al Atem M, Blaizot A, Duchatelet A, Collin S, Rousset J 2022 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 11636Google Scholar

    [21]

    Porte Y, Maller R, Faber H, AlShareef H N, Anthopoulos T D, McLachlan M A 2016 J. Mater. Chem. C 4 758Google Scholar

    [22]

    杜荣池, 王广才, 张晓丹, 张迎春, 赵颖 2017 真空与低温 23 136Google Scholar

    Du R C, Wang G C, Zhang X D, Zhang Y C, Zhao Y 2017 Vacuum and Cryogenics 23 136Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li F, Shen Z, Weng Y, Lou Q, Chen C, Shen L, Guo W, Li G 2020 Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 2004933Google Scholar

    [24]

    Le Corre V M, Duijnstee E A, El Tambouli O, Ball J M, Snaith H J, Lim J, Koster L J A 2021 ACS Energy Lett. 6 1087Google Scholar

  • [1] 许畅, 郑德旭, 董心睿, 吴飒建, 武明星, 王开, 刘生忠. 钙钛矿基三结叠层太阳电池的研究进展.  , 2024, 73(24): . doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241187
    [2] 张喜生, 晏春愉, 胡李纳, 王景州, 姚陈忠. 低温溶液加工CsPbBr3纳晶薄膜制备钙钛矿太阳电池.  , 2024, 73(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241152
    [3] 瞿子涵, 赵洋, 马飞, 游经碧. 原子层沉积金属氧化物缓冲层制备高性能大面积钙钛矿太阳电池.  , 2024, 73(9): 098802. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240218
    [4] 韩梅斗雪, 王雅, 王荣波, 赵均陶, 任慧志, 侯国付, 赵颖, 张晓丹, 丁毅. 锂掺杂提高硫氰酸亚铜的电学特性及在钙钛矿太阳电池中的应用.  , 2022, 0(0): . doi: 10.7498/aps.7120221222
    [5] 韩梅斗雪, 王雅, 王荣波, 赵均陶, 任慧志, 侯国付, 赵颖, 张晓丹, 丁毅. 锂掺杂提高硫氰酸亚铜的电学特性及在钙钛矿太阳电池中的应用.  , 2022, 71(21): 217801. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221222
    [6] 王其, 延玲玲, 陈兵兵, 李仁杰, 王三龙, 王鹏阳, 黄茜, 许盛之, 侯国付, 陈新亮, 李跃龙, 丁毅, 张德坤, 王广才, 赵颖, 张晓丹. 钙钛矿/硅异质结叠层太阳电池: 光学模拟的研究进展.  , 2021, 70(5): 057802. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201585
    [7] 卢辉东, 韩红静, 刘杰. FA1–xCsx PbI3–y Bry钙钛矿材料优化及太阳电池性能计算.  , 2021, 70(3): 036301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201387
    [8] 卢辉东, 韩红静, 刘杰. 有机铅碘钙钛矿太阳电池结构优化及光电性能计算.  , 2021, 70(16): 168802. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210134
    [9] 徐婷, 王子帅, 李炫华, 沙威. 基于等效电路模型的钙钛矿太阳电池效率损失机理分析.  , 2021, 70(9): 098801. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201975
    [10] 李燕, 贺红, 党威武, 陈雪莲, 孙璨, 郑嘉璐. 钙钛矿太阳电池中各功能层的光辐照稳定性研究进展.  , 2021, 70(9): 098402. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201762
    [11] 潘恒, 陈沛润, 石标, 李玉成, 高清运, 张力, 赵颖, 黄茜, 张晓丹. 钙钛矿电池纳米陷光结构的研究进展.  , 2020, 69(7): 077101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191660
    [12] 梁晓娟, 曹宇, 蔡宏琨, 苏健, 倪牮, 李娟, 张建军. 肖特基钙钛矿太阳电池结构设计与优化.  , 2020, 69(5): 057901. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191891
    [13] 陈永亮, 唐亚文, 陈沛润, 张力, 刘琪, 赵颖, 黄茜, 张晓丹. 钙钛矿太阳电池中的缓冲层研究进展.  , 2020, 69(13): 138401. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200543
    [14] 吴步军, 林东旭, 李征, 程振平, 李新, 陈科, 时婷婷, 谢伟广, 刘彭义. 钙钛矿薄膜气相制备的晶粒尺寸优化及高效光伏转换.  , 2019, 68(7): 078801. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182221
    [15] 李少华, 李海涛, 江亚晓, 涂丽敏, 李文标, 潘玲, 杨仕娥, 陈永生. 高效平面异质结有机-无机杂化钙钛矿太阳电池的质量管理.  , 2018, 67(15): 158801. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172600
    [16] 李海涛, 江亚晓, 涂丽敏, 李少华, 潘玲, 李文标, 杨仕娥, 陈永生. 退火温度对电子束蒸发沉积Cu2O薄膜性能的影响.  , 2018, 67(5): 053301. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172463
    [17] 王军霞, 毕卓能, 梁柱荣, 徐雪青. 新型碳材料在钙钛矿太阳电池中的应用研究进展.  , 2016, 65(5): 058801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.058801
    [18] 王福芝, 谭占鳌, 戴松元, 李永舫. 平面异质结有机-无机杂化钙钛矿太阳电池研究进展.  , 2015, 64(3): 038401. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.038401
    [19] 修春波, 刘畅, 郭富慧, 成怡, 罗菁. 迟滞混沌神经元/网络的控制策略及应用研究.  , 2015, 64(6): 060504. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.060504
    [20] 侯璐景, 王友年. 尘埃颗粒在射频等离子体鞘层中的非线性共振现象的理论研究.  , 2003, 52(2): 434-441. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.434
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4539
  • PDF下载量:  152
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-30
  • 修回日期:  2023-06-28
  • 上网日期:  2023-07-06
  • 刊出日期:  2023-09-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map