-
基于光栅干涉仪系统的X射线微分相位衬度计算机层析成像, 不仅可以重建物体的线性衰减系数, 还可以重建物体的相移系数和线性散射系数. 在实际应用时, 大面积光栅不易获得, 常常遇到样品大于光栅的情况. 当用小于样品的光栅对样品进行扫描时, 样品超出光栅成像视野的部分会导致微分相位投影信息被截断. 本文针对微分相位衬度计算机层析成像提出了一种相移系数的感兴趣区域重建方法. 该方法利用物体相移系数和线性衰减系数(即折射率实部减小量和折射率虚部)之间的近似线性关系; 通过重建相移系数的Lambda函数和线性衰减系数的Lambda逆函数的多项式组合, 近似重建物体感兴趣区域的相移系数. 数值模拟实验依据菲涅耳衍射积分理论, 进行计算机仿真X射线的传播过程和光栅成像过程. 实际实验利用上海同步辐射BL13W1站的Talbot光栅干涉仪系统, 分别对标准模体和生物样品进行光栅微分相位衬度计算机层析成像. 数值模拟和实际实验结果都验证了该方法的有效性.X-ray differential phase contrast computed tomography imaging based on grating interferometer system can reconstruct not only the linear attenuation coefficient, but also the phase shift coefficient and the linear scattering coefficient of the object. In practical application, it is very difficult to make a large area grating, so the sample is often larger than the grating. When the sample is scanned with a grating smaller than the sample, the part of the sample beyond the field of view of the grating will cause the differential phase projection information to be truncated. In this paper, a method of reconstructing the region of interest for differential phase contrast computed tomography is proposed. The method is based on the approximate linear relation between the phase shift coefficient of the object and the linear attenuation coefficient (i.e. the decrement in the real part of the refractive index and the imaginary part of the refractive index), the phase shift coefficient of the region of interest is approximately reconstructed by the polynomial of Lambda function of the phase shift coefficient and Lambda inverse function of linear attenuation coefficient. In this paper, according to the Fresnel diffraction theory and differential phase grating phase step-by-step method of imaging a simulation experiment is performed. In the experiment, conducted is the approximate reconstruction by using the first order polynomial and quadratic polynomial of Lambda function of the phase shift coefficient and Lambda inverse function of linear attenuation coefficient. The sample size is five times of grating imaging field, and the results show that this method can approximately reconstruct the region of interest for the sample image. We also carry out the actual data experiment. The actual data are obtained by the Talbot grating interferometer system of Shanghai synchrotron radiation BL13W1 station, and the standard model and biological sample are imaged. The method of reconstructing the region of interest is proposed in this paper. This method can be applied to the multi-material samples with a similar relationship between the decrement in the real part of the refractive index and the decrement in the imaginary part of the refractive index, and also to single-material samples. The comparison between the numerical simulations and the actual experimental results verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.
-
Keywords:
- differential phase contrast /
- computed tomography /
- reconstruction of region of interest /
- phase shift coefficient
[1] Momose A, Takeda T, Itai Y 1995 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66 1434Google Scholar
[2] Momose A, Takeda T, Itai Y Hirano K 1996 Nat. Med. 2 473Google Scholar
[3] David C, Nohammer B, Solak H H, Ziegler, E 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3287Google Scholar
[4] Momose A, Kawamoto S, Koyama I, Hamaishi Y, Takai K, Suzuki Y 2003 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 L866Google Scholar
[5] 陈博, 朱佩平, 刘宜晋, 王寯越, 袁清习, 黄万霞, 明海, 吴自玉 2008 57 1576Google Scholar
Chen B, Zhu P P, Liu Y J, Wang J Y, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Ming H, Wu Z Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 1576Google Scholar
[6] Zou Y, Pan X, Sidky E Y 2005 Phys. Med. Biol 50 13Google Scholar
[7] 张慧滔, 陈明, 张朋 2007 自然科学进展 17 1589Google Scholar
Zhang H T, Chen M, Zhang P 2007 Prog. Nat. Sci. 17 1589Google Scholar
[8] Smith K T, Keinert F 1985 Appl. Optics 24 3950Google Scholar
[9] Faridani A, Ritman E L, Smith K T 1992 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 459Google Scholar
[10] Faridani A, Finch D V, Ritman E L, Smith K T 1997 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57 1095Google Scholar
[11] Anastasio M A, Pan X 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 3167Google Scholar
[12] Cong W, Yang J, Wang G 2011 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 2905Google Scholar
[13] Pascal Thériault Lauzier, Qi Z, Zambelli J, Bevins N, Chen G H 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 117Google Scholar
[14] Yang Q, Cong W, Wang G Developments in X-Ray Tomography X San Diego, California, United States, August 28–September 1, 2016 p996709-1
[15] Felsner L, Berger M, Kaeppler S, Bopp J, Riess C 2018 Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2018 (Springer: Cham) pp137−144
[16] Felsner L, Kaeppler S, Maier A, Riess C 2020 IEEE T Comput. Imag. 6 625Google Scholar
[17] Hsieh J 2009. Computed Tomography Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances (2nd Ed.) (Washington: Wiley) pp55−114
[18] Pan X, Xia D, Zou Y, Yu L 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4349Google Scholar
[19] Gordon R, Bender R, Herman G T 1970 J. Theor. Biol. 29 471Google Scholar
[20] Pfeiffer F, David C, Bunk O, Donath T, Bech M, Duc G L, Bravin A, Cloetens P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 168101Google Scholar
[21] Wu X, Liu H, Yan A 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 379Google Scholar
[22] Chen R C, Dreossi D, Mancini L, Menk R, Rigon L, Xiao T Q, Longo R 2012 J. Synchrotron. Radiat. 19 836Google Scholar
[23] Zanette I, Bech M, Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 23Google Scholar
[24] Rong F, Liang Y, Yang Y D, Ma X H 2017 Infrared Laser Eng. 46 1220002Google Scholar
[25] Zanette I, Bech M, Rack A, Le Duc G, Tafforeau P, David C 2012 PNAS 109 10199Google Scholar
[26] 王圣浩 2015 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学)
Wang S H 2015 Ph. D. Dissertation ((Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
-
图 3 相移系数重建结果 (a) 采用一次多项式近似的重建图像; (b)采用二次多项式近似的重建图像; (c) 图3(a)和图3(b)在绿色虚线位置处的剖线图
Fig. 3. Reconstruction results of phase shift coefficient: (a) The reconstruction image using a first order polynomial approximation; (b) the reconstruction image using a second order polynomial approximation; (c) Fig.3 (a) and Fig.3 (b) in the green dotted line location profile chart.
图 4 相移系数重建结果 (a)实验模体; (b)全局数据重建图像, 红色虚线内为感兴趣区域图像; (c)截断数据采用一次多项式近似的重建图像; (d)截断数据采用二次多项式近似的重建图像; (e) 图4(c)和图4(d)在绿色虚线位置处的剖线图
Fig. 4. Reconstruction results of phase shift coefficient: (a) Experimental modle; (b) the reconstruction image of global data, the ROI image is in the red dotted line; (c) the reconstruction image of the truncated data using a first order polynomial approximation; (d) the reconstruction image of the truncated data using a second order polynomial approximation; (e) Fig.4 (c) and Fig.4 (d) in the green dotted line location profile chart.
图 6 相移系数重建图像 (a) 全局数据重建图像, 红色虚线内为感兴趣区域图像; (b) 全局数据的感兴趣区域重建图像; (c) 截断数据采用一次多项式近似的重建图像
Fig. 6. Reconstruction image of phase shift coefficient: (a) The reconstruction image of global data, the ROI image is in the red dotted line; (b) the reconstruction image of the ROI from the global data; (c) the reconstruction image of the truncated data using a first order polynomial approximation.
表 1 一次多项式和二次多项式重建结果的MSE和PSNR
Table 1. MSE and PSNR of reconstruction results of the first order polynomial and the second order polynomial.
方法 MSE PSNR 一次多项式 0.0796 10.9894 二次多项式 0.0271 15.6647 表 2 水、PTFE、PMMA、LDPE的折射率实部减小量
$\delta $ Table 2. The decrement of the real part of the refractive index of water, PTFE, PMMA, and LDPE.
材料 水(H2O) PTFE
(C2F4)PMMA
(C5O2H8)LDPE
(C2H4)$\delta $/10–7 5.26 9.65 6.30 5.46 -
[1] Momose A, Takeda T, Itai Y 1995 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66 1434Google Scholar
[2] Momose A, Takeda T, Itai Y Hirano K 1996 Nat. Med. 2 473Google Scholar
[3] David C, Nohammer B, Solak H H, Ziegler, E 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 3287Google Scholar
[4] Momose A, Kawamoto S, Koyama I, Hamaishi Y, Takai K, Suzuki Y 2003 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42 L866Google Scholar
[5] 陈博, 朱佩平, 刘宜晋, 王寯越, 袁清习, 黄万霞, 明海, 吴自玉 2008 57 1576Google Scholar
Chen B, Zhu P P, Liu Y J, Wang J Y, Yuan Q X, Huang W X, Ming H, Wu Z Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 1576Google Scholar
[6] Zou Y, Pan X, Sidky E Y 2005 Phys. Med. Biol 50 13Google Scholar
[7] 张慧滔, 陈明, 张朋 2007 自然科学进展 17 1589Google Scholar
Zhang H T, Chen M, Zhang P 2007 Prog. Nat. Sci. 17 1589Google Scholar
[8] Smith K T, Keinert F 1985 Appl. Optics 24 3950Google Scholar
[9] Faridani A, Ritman E L, Smith K T 1992 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 459Google Scholar
[10] Faridani A, Finch D V, Ritman E L, Smith K T 1997 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57 1095Google Scholar
[11] Anastasio M A, Pan X 2007 Opt. Lett. 32 3167Google Scholar
[12] Cong W, Yang J, Wang G 2011 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 2905Google Scholar
[13] Pascal Thériault Lauzier, Qi Z, Zambelli J, Bevins N, Chen G H 2012 Phys. Med. Biol. 57 117Google Scholar
[14] Yang Q, Cong W, Wang G Developments in X-Ray Tomography X San Diego, California, United States, August 28–September 1, 2016 p996709-1
[15] Felsner L, Berger M, Kaeppler S, Bopp J, Riess C 2018 Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2018 (Springer: Cham) pp137−144
[16] Felsner L, Kaeppler S, Maier A, Riess C 2020 IEEE T Comput. Imag. 6 625Google Scholar
[17] Hsieh J 2009. Computed Tomography Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances (2nd Ed.) (Washington: Wiley) pp55−114
[18] Pan X, Xia D, Zou Y, Yu L 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4349Google Scholar
[19] Gordon R, Bender R, Herman G T 1970 J. Theor. Biol. 29 471Google Scholar
[20] Pfeiffer F, David C, Bunk O, Donath T, Bech M, Duc G L, Bravin A, Cloetens P 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 168101Google Scholar
[21] Wu X, Liu H, Yan A 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 379Google Scholar
[22] Chen R C, Dreossi D, Mancini L, Menk R, Rigon L, Xiao T Q, Longo R 2012 J. Synchrotron. Radiat. 19 836Google Scholar
[23] Zanette I, Bech M, Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 23Google Scholar
[24] Rong F, Liang Y, Yang Y D, Ma X H 2017 Infrared Laser Eng. 46 1220002Google Scholar
[25] Zanette I, Bech M, Rack A, Le Duc G, Tafforeau P, David C 2012 PNAS 109 10199Google Scholar
[26] 王圣浩 2015 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学)
Wang S H 2015 Ph. D. Dissertation ((Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
计量
- 文章访问数: 4779
- PDF下载量: 69
- 被引次数: 0