月尘被动防护技术的最新研究进展

穆萌; 张海燕; 王晓; 李存惠; 张小平; 王明智; 朱应敏; 高立波; 赵呈选; 陆洋; 王卫东

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20201517

摘要

月球的特殊环境使月尘具有导电等特殊的性质, 极易黏附在探测仪器上造成设备的失效, 给探月工程带来极大的危害, 因此国内外众多研究组针对月尘危害展开深入研究. 本文从黏附机理、防护方法和实验测试几方面对月尘的被动防护技术进行综述和展望. 首先, 阐述了月尘对探测设备造成的不利影响及影响因素, 进而具体论述月尘黏附的机理, 详细介绍造成黏附的两种主要作用力的理论基础. 然后, 针对不同作用机理系统阐述了降低月尘颗粒黏附力的主要方法, 对月尘被动防护技术的最新进展进行了总结. 最后, 结合防护方式的不同, 总结了测试月尘黏附力的方法, 从而为有效实现探测设备表面月尘防护奠定基础.

关键词:

Abstract

In lunar circumstances, lunar dust has special properties such as conductivity, which can cause lunar dust to easily adhere to the surface of detection equipment. And this behavior will cause the equipment to fail to function properly and thus affecting the lunar exploration missions. According to the researches of lunar dust protection, in this article the passive protection technology of lunar dust is mainly analyzed. Firstly, the lunar-dust caused adverse factors and effects on detection equipment are analyzed. Then the mechanism of lunar dust adhesion is studied, and the theoretical basis of the two main forces that cause adhesion is discussed. Secondly, the main methods of reducing the adhesion of lunar dust particles are systematically explained according to different adhesion mechanisms, and the latest progress of the passive protection technology of the lunar dust is introduced in detail. Combined with the different protection methods, the method of testing the adhesion of the lunar dust is summarized. These studies lay the foundation for effectively protecting the surface of detection equipment from being affected by the lunar dust.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
西安电子科技大学机电工程学院, 西安　710071

2.
兰州空间技术物理研究所, 真空技术与物理重点实验室, 兰州　730000

3.
澳门科技大学, 月球与行星科学国家重点实验室, 澳门　999078

4.
港城大-西电微纳制造联合实验室, 深圳　518057

5.
香港城市大学机械工程系, 香港　999077

通信作者: 李存惠, licunhui@spacechina.com ; 王卫东, wangwd@mail.xidian.edu.cn

基金项目: 真空技术与物理重点实验室基金(批准号: HTKJ2019KL510007)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 42004157, 12075108)和陕西省重点研发计划(批准号: 2020GY-252)资助的课题

Authors and contacts

1.
School of Mechano-Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China

2.
Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory, Lanzhou Institute of Physics, Lanzhou 730000, China

3.
State Key Laboratory of Lunar and Planetary Sciences, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China

4.
CityU-Xidian Joint Laboratory of Micro/Nano-Manufacturing, Shenzhen 518057, China

5.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Corresponding author: Li Cun-Hui, licunhui@spacechina.com ; Wang Wei-Dong, wangwd@mail.xidian.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Fund of the Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics Laboratory, China (Grant No. HTKJ2019KL510007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42004157, 12075108), and the Key R&D Program of Shaanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2020GY-252)

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Zhang H, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhang H, Li C, Zhuang J, Li D, Wang Y, Yang S, Li X, Wang W 2020 Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 63 520 Google Scholar
[2]	裴照宇, 侯军, 王琼 2020 红外与激光工程 49 19 Google Scholar Pei Z Y, Hou J, Wang Q 2020 Infrared Laser Eng. 49 19 Google Scholar
[3]	Gaier J R 2011 SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 4 279 Google Scholar
[4]	Mcallister F 1972 NASA Technical Report TN D-6737
[5]	Morea S F 1992 Conference on Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century Houston, USA, April 5–7, 1988 p619
[6]	Buhler C R, Calle C I, Clements J S, Mantovani J, Ritz M I 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference Big Sky, USA, March 3–10, 2007 p1
[7]	潘万竞 2016 硕士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学) Pan W J 2016 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[8]	Sun Y, Liu J, Zheng Y, Xiao C, Wan B, Guo L, Wang X, Bo W 2017 J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 81 133 Google Scholar
[9]	Walton O R 2007 NASA Technical Report 214685
[10]	Berkebile S, Street K, Gaier J 2011 3rd AIAA Atmospheric Space Environments Conference Honolulu, USA, June 27–30, 2011 p3675
[11]	Greenberg P S, Chen D R, Smith S A 2007 NASA Technical Report 214956
[12]	Yang L, Jaesung P, Darren S, Eddy H, Lawrence A T 2008 J. Aerosp. Eng. 21 272 Google Scholar
[13]	Heavens N G, Richardson M I, Kleinböhl A 2011 J. Geophys. Res.Planets 4 116 Google Scholar
[14]	Grün E, Horanyi M, Sternovsky Z 2011 Planet. Space Sci. 59 1672 Google Scholar
[15]	Horanyi M 1996 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34 383 Google Scholar
[16]	Rima J I, Daniel J, Luis A, Benjamin F, Monhammed A 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 191 413 Google Scholar
[17]	Dzyaloshinskii IE, Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP 1961 Adv. Phys. 10 165 Google Scholar
[18]	Hamed A, Geoffrey E, Roberto M A 2016 Powder Technol. 299 9 Google Scholar
[19]	Avijit K, Shuvojit P, Soumitro B, Banerjee A 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 123701 Google Scholar
[20]	Valmacco V, Elzbieciak-Wodka M, Besnard C, Maroni P, Trefalt G, Borkovec M 2016 Nanoscale Horiz. 1 325 Google Scholar
[21]	Holger G, Miltiadis V P 2017 Powder Technol. 322 185 Google Scholar
[22]	Javid M, Amin K M, Vahid A, Shokoufeh A, Matthew S 2019 J. Electrostat. 97 58 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang J, Wang X, Zhu T, Zhao Y 2018 J. Electrostat. 94 14 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao Y, Fang J, Wang Y, Shen Y, Wang C 2019 Powder Technol. 357 33 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhu K, Rao S M, Huang H Q, Wang C H, Matsusaka S, Masuda H 2004 Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 3201 Google Scholar
[26]	Nein M E, Davis B 1991 Proc. SPIE 98 110 Google Scholar
[27]	Polizos G, Sharma J K, Smith D B, Tuncer E, Park J, Voylov D, Sololov A P, Meyer H M, Aman M 2018 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 188 255 Google Scholar
[28]	薛伟, 郑蓓蓉, 张淼, 解国新, 王权 2009 4 2518 Google Scholar Xue W, Zheng R R, Zhang M, Xie G X, Wang Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 4 2518 Google Scholar
[29]	颜晨曦, 宋娟娟, 曹建平 2019 电镀与精饰 41 14 Google Scholar Yan C X, Song J J, Cao J P 2019 Plat. Finish. 41 14 Google Scholar
[30]	Zhan W, Wang W, Xiao Z, Yu X, Zhang Y 2018 Surf. Coat. Technol. 356 123 Google Scholar
[31]	Amiriafshar M, Rafieazad M, Duan X, AliNasiri A 2020 Surf. Interfaces 100526Google Scholar
[32]	Peillon S, Autricque A, Redolfi M, Stancu C, Pluchery O 2019 J. Aerosol Sci. 137 105431 Google Scholar
[33]	Moutinho H R, Jiang C S, To B, Perkins, Muller M, Al-Jassim M M, Simpson L 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 172 145 Google Scholar
[34]	Wu S, Altenried S, Zogg A, Zuber F, Maniura K, Ren Q 2018 ACS Omega 3 6456 Google Scholar
[35]	Li D, Li N, Su X, Liu K, Ji P, Wang B 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 489 648 Google Scholar
[36]	Ji Z, Bao L, Wang H, Chen R 2017 Mater. Lett. 207 21 Google Scholar
[37]	Gotlib-Vainstein K, Gouzman I, Girshevitz O, Bolker A, Atar N, Grossman E, Sukenlk, Chaim N 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 3539 Google Scholar
[38]	Du Q, Ai J, Qin Z, Liu J, Zeng X 2018 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 251 188 Google Scholar
[39]	Critchlow G, Webb P, Tremlett C, Brown K 2000 Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 20 113 Google Scholar
[40]	Van Dam J P B, Abrahami S T, Yilmaz A, Gonzalez G, Trrryn H 2020 Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 96 102450 Google Scholar
[41]	Chen J, Qi A, Rodriguez R D, Sheremmet E, Wang Y, Sowade E, Baumann R R, Feng Z 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 487 503 Google Scholar
[42]	Quan Y Y, Zhang L Z 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 160 382 Google Scholar
[43]	Chi F T, Liu D J, Wu H Y, Lei J H 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 200 109939 Google Scholar
[44]	Maharjan S, Liao K, Wang A, Barton K, Curran S A 2020 Mater. Chem. Phys. 239 122000 Google Scholar
[45]	Cui H, Zheng Z 2019 Thin Solid Films 691 137612 Google Scholar
[46]	Choi D Y, Jung S H, Song D K, An E J, Park D, Kim T O, Jung J H, Lee H M 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 16495 Google Scholar
[47]	Masuda S, Fujibayashi K, Ishida K, Inaba H 1972 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 92 43 Google Scholar
[48]	Kawamoto H, Uchiyama M, Cooper B L, McKay D S 2011 J. Electrostat. 69 370 Google Scholar
[49]	Kawamoto H, Guo B 2018 J. Electrostat. 91 28 Google Scholar
[50]	Yilbas B S, Al-Qahtani H, Al-Sharafi A, Bahattab S, Kassas M 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 8703 Google Scholar
[51]	Kohli R 2019 Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques (Vol. 11) (Amsterdam: Elsevier) p391
[52]	Manyapu K K, De Leon P, Peltz L, Gaier J R, Waters D 2017 Acta Astronaut. 137 472 Google Scholar
[53]	Kavya K M, Leora P, Pablo D L 2019 J. Space Saf. Eng. 6 248 Google Scholar
[54]	Richard D, Norman J W, Maria K 2018 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 8－12, 2018 p183
[55]	Jiang J, Lu Y, Zhao H, Wang L 2019 Acta Astronaut. 165 17 Google Scholar
[56]	Lu Y, Jiang J, Yan X, Wang L 2019 Smart Mater. Struct. 28 085010 Google Scholar
[57]	Zhang J, Zhu C, Lv J, Wei C, Feng J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 40219 Google Scholar
[58]	Crowder M S, Stover R, Lawitzke A, Devaud G, Dove A, Wang X 2010 Optical System Contamination: Effects, Measurements, and Control San Diego, USA, August 10, 2008 p77940G
[59]	Nguyen T T, Rambanapasi C, Boer A H D, Fruhkubj H W, Ven P, Vries J, Busscher H, Maarschalk K 2010 Int. J. Pharm. 393 89 Google Scholar
[60]	徐阳, 齐振一, 王志浩, 田东波 2019 表面技术 48 167 Google Scholar Xu Y, Qi Z Y, Wang Z H, Tian D P 2019 Surf. Technol. 48 167 Google Scholar
[61]	Gaier J, Waters D L, Misconin R, Banks B, Crowder M 2011 41st International Conference on Environmental System Portland, Oregon, July 17-21, 2011 p5183
[62]	孙旗霞, 杨宁宁, 蔡小兵, 胡更开 2012 力学进展 6 113 Google Scholar Sun Q X, Yang N N, Cai X B, Hu G K 2012 Adv. Mech. 6 113 Google Scholar
[63]	Gaier J R, Jaworske D A 2007 AIP Conference Proc. 880 27 Google Scholar
[64]	Kulvanich P, Stewart P 1987 Int. J. Pharm. 35 111 Google Scholar
[65]	Booth S W, Newton J M 1987 J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 39 679 Google Scholar
[66]	Salazar-Banda G R, Felicetti M A, Concalves J A S, Coury J R, Aguiar M L 2007 Powder Technol. 173 107 Google Scholar
[67]	Markelonis A, Wang J S, Ullrich B U, Chien M W, Brown G J 2014 Appl. Nanoscience 5 457 Google Scholar
[68]	Schulze H, Wahl B, Gottschalk G 1989 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 128 57 Google Scholar
[69]	Kawamoto H, Seki K 2005 Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. C 71 1161 Google Scholar
[70]	Kawamoto H 2012 Proceedings of Earth and Space Conference Shanghai, China, June 8–11, 2012 p94
[71]	王志浩, 白羽, 田东波, 李蔓 2015 装备环境工程 12 75 Google Scholar Wang Z H, Bai Y, Tian D B, Li M 2015 Equip. Environ. Eng. 12 75 Google Scholar
[72]	李青, 任德鹏, 王闯, 张熇 2018 航天器工程 27 137 Google Scholar Li Q, Ren D P, Wang C, Zhang H 2018 Spacecraft Eng. 27 137 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 Appllo任务中被月尘污染的宇航服　(a)宇航服整体污染情况; (b)宇航服局部污染情况^[7]

Fig. 1. Spacesuit contaminated by lunar dust during Apollo mission: (a) Overall pollution of spacesuit; (b) local contamination of spacesuit^[7].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同形貌的20 μm月尘颗粒扫描电子显微镜(SEM)暗场像^[12]

Fig. 2. Various surface and shape features of 20 μm lunar dust particles via scanning electron microscope (SEM)^[12].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同方式处理后的玻璃表面的黏附力　(a), (b)太阳能玻璃表面上的粒子组件的AFM图像; (c)用PDMS预处理的太阳能玻璃、太阳能玻璃、涂有纳米结构粒子组件的太阳能玻璃上的黏附力值; 在10个不同的区域进行测量, 值的误差小于10%, 灰色区域对应于将二氧化硅球从表面分离所需的能量^[27]

Fig. 3. Adhesion force of solar glass surface treated in different ways: (a), (b) AFM images of the particle assemblies on the solar glass surface; (c) adhesion force values on the surface of solar glass pretreated with PDMS, solar glass, and solar glass coated with nanostructured particle assemblies. Measurements were performed on ten different areas. The error in the values is less than 10%. The grey areas correspond to the energy required to separate a silica sphere from the surface^[27].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 纳米结构涂层的制备及表面特征　(a)纳米结构涂层的制备; (b)—(e)在700 °C进行2 h相分离处理后的涂层SEM图像, 其中(b)酸预处理后的表面图像; (c)酸蚀刻处理后的表面低倍率图像和(d)高倍率图像; (e)热处理后的涂层的SEM图像^[30]

Fig. 4. Preparation and surface characteristics of nanostructured coatings. (a) Preparation of the nanostructured coatings. (b)–(e) SEM images of coatings after phase separation treatment at 700 °C for 2 h: (b) Image of the surface after acid pretreatment; (c) low-magnification and (d) high-magnification images of the surface after acid etching treatment; (e) SEM image of the coating after heat treatment^[30].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 (a)接收样品、(b)喷砂样品和(c)研磨样品表面SEM图像; (d), (e), (f) EDX叠加在接收、喷砂、研磨样品的SEM图像; (g) 研磨样品(f)的高倍扫描电镜显微图; (h)涂Zn涂层的研磨样品截面图^[31]

Fig. 5. SEM micrographs taken from the surface of (a) as-received, (b) sand-blasted, and (c) ground samples. The EDX chemical concentration maps superimposed on the SEM images of the coated (d) as-received, (e) sand-blasted, and (f) ground surfaces. (g) Higher magnification SEM micrograph of the ground surface shown in (f). (h) SEM image showing the applied Zn coating cross-sectional view on the ground surface^[31].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 表面粗糙度值不同时AFM针尖和SiO₂球的附着力^[33]

Fig. 6. Adhesion of AFM tip and SiO₂ ball with different surface roughness values^[33].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 电容耦合放电等离子体中的刻蚀示意图

Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of etching in capacitively coupled discharge plasma.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 具有自清洁和抗磨损的抗反射膜^[36]

Fig. 8. Anti-reflective film with self-cleaning and anti-wear^[36].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同激光功率强度及强度处理的聚酰亚胺表面的水接触角^[38]　(a) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm², 40%; (b) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm², 60%; (c) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm², 90%; (d)前进角7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm², 90%; (e)滞后角7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm², 90%; (f) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm², –40%; (g) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm², 0%; (h) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm², 40%

Fig. 9. Water contact angle of polyimide surface treated with different laser power intensities and overlaps: (a) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm² and 40%; (b) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm² and 60%; (c) 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm² and 90%; (d) advancing angle at 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm² and 90%; (e) receding angle at 7.7 × 10⁴ W/cm² and 90%; (f) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm² and –40%; (g) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm² and 0%; (h) 1.0 × 10⁶ W/cm² and 40%^[38].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 聚酰亚胺(PI)薄膜表面形貌图^[41]　(a), (d), (g)原始PI薄膜的SEM, AFM, EDS图像; (b), (e), (h)使用KOH预处理后的PI薄膜的SEM, AFM, EDS图像; (c), (f), (i)使用GA-PEI进一步处理后的PI薄膜的SEM, AFM, EDS图像

Fig. 10. Surface topography of polyimide film^[41]: SEM images, AFM images and EDS spectra of (a), (d), (g) original PI film, (b), (e), (h) pre-modified PI film treated with KOH and (c), (f), (i) PI film further treated with GA-PEI.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 电沉积法制备的ITO (a) 和TiO₂/ITO (b)的涂层玻璃基底的FE-SEM图像^[45]

Fig. 11. FE-SEM images of ITO (a) and TiO₂/ITO (b) coated glass substrates prepared by electrodeposition for 5 min ^[45].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 采用(a)行波和(b)驻波的静电清洗系统原理图^[49]

Fig. 12. Schematic diagrams of the electrostatic cleaning systems that use a (a) traveling wave and (b) standing wave^[49].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 STF减缓粉尘渗入及EPG壳层织物的超疏水处理^[54]

Fig. 13. STF reduces dust penetration and super-hydrophobic treatment of EPG shell fabric^[54].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 表面月尘涂敷及“吹扫”过程^[58]

Fig. 14. Lunar dust coating and “purge” process^[58].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 几种不同的用于测颗粒黏附的离心管结构^[64-68]

Fig. 15. Several different centrifuge tube structures used to measure particle adhesion^[64-68].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 一种用于防尘测试的真空离心装置^[58]

Fig. 16. Vacuum centrifugal device for dustproof test^[58].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 表面处理前后样品表面灰尘吸附效果^[61]

Fig. 17. Dust adsorption effect on sample surface before and after surface treatment^[61].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 四相电帘在空气与真空环境下的除尘效果^[70]

Fig. 18. Dust removal effect of four-phase electric curtain in air and vacuum environment^[70].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 月球环境模拟装置LDAB^[63]

Fig. 19. Lunar Environment Simulator LDAB^[63].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

map

[1]	Zhang H, Wang Y, Chen L, Zhang H, Li C, Zhuang J, Li D, Wang Y, Yang S, Li X, Wang W 2020 Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 63 520 Google Scholar
[2]	裴照宇, 侯军, 王琼 2020 红外与激光工程 49 19 Google Scholar Pei Z Y, Hou J, Wang Q 2020 Infrared Laser Eng. 49 19 Google Scholar
[3]	Gaier J R 2011 SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 4 279 Google Scholar
[4]	Mcallister F 1972 NASA Technical Report TN D-6737
[5]	Morea S F 1992 Conference on Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century Houston, USA, April 5–7, 1988 p619
[6]	Buhler C R, Calle C I, Clements J S, Mantovani J, Ritz M I 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference Big Sky, USA, March 3–10, 2007 p1
[7]	潘万竞 2016 硕士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学) Pan W J 2016 M. S. Thesis (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[8]	Sun Y, Liu J, Zheng Y, Xiao C, Wan B, Guo L, Wang X, Bo W 2017 J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 81 133 Google Scholar
[9]	Walton O R 2007 NASA Technical Report 214685
[10]	Berkebile S, Street K, Gaier J 2011 3rd AIAA Atmospheric Space Environments Conference Honolulu, USA, June 27–30, 2011 p3675
[11]	Greenberg P S, Chen D R, Smith S A 2007 NASA Technical Report 214956
[12]	Yang L, Jaesung P, Darren S, Eddy H, Lawrence A T 2008 J. Aerosp. Eng. 21 272 Google Scholar
[13]	Heavens N G, Richardson M I, Kleinböhl A 2011 J. Geophys. Res.Planets 4 116 Google Scholar
[14]	Grün E, Horanyi M, Sternovsky Z 2011 Planet. Space Sci. 59 1672 Google Scholar
[15]	Horanyi M 1996 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34 383 Google Scholar
[16]	Rima J I, Daniel J, Luis A, Benjamin F, Monhammed A 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 191 413 Google Scholar
[17]	Dzyaloshinskii IE, Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP 1961 Adv. Phys. 10 165 Google Scholar
[18]	Hamed A, Geoffrey E, Roberto M A 2016 Powder Technol. 299 9 Google Scholar
[19]	Avijit K, Shuvojit P, Soumitro B, Banerjee A 2019 Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 123701 Google Scholar
[20]	Valmacco V, Elzbieciak-Wodka M, Besnard C, Maroni P, Trefalt G, Borkovec M 2016 Nanoscale Horiz. 1 325 Google Scholar
[21]	Holger G, Miltiadis V P 2017 Powder Technol. 322 185 Google Scholar
[22]	Javid M, Amin K M, Vahid A, Shokoufeh A, Matthew S 2019 J. Electrostat. 97 58 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang J, Wang X, Zhu T, Zhao Y 2018 J. Electrostat. 94 14 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao Y, Fang J, Wang Y, Shen Y, Wang C 2019 Powder Technol. 357 33 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhu K, Rao S M, Huang H Q, Wang C H, Matsusaka S, Masuda H 2004 Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 3201 Google Scholar
[26]	Nein M E, Davis B 1991 Proc. SPIE 98 110 Google Scholar
[27]	Polizos G, Sharma J K, Smith D B, Tuncer E, Park J, Voylov D, Sololov A P, Meyer H M, Aman M 2018 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 188 255 Google Scholar
[28]	薛伟, 郑蓓蓉, 张淼, 解国新, 王权 2009 4 2518 Google Scholar Xue W, Zheng R R, Zhang M, Xie G X, Wang Q 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 4 2518 Google Scholar
[29]	颜晨曦, 宋娟娟, 曹建平 2019 电镀与精饰 41 14 Google Scholar Yan C X, Song J J, Cao J P 2019 Plat. Finish. 41 14 Google Scholar
[30]	Zhan W, Wang W, Xiao Z, Yu X, Zhang Y 2018 Surf. Coat. Technol. 356 123 Google Scholar
[31]	Amiriafshar M, Rafieazad M, Duan X, AliNasiri A 2020 Surf. Interfaces 100526Google Scholar
[32]	Peillon S, Autricque A, Redolfi M, Stancu C, Pluchery O 2019 J. Aerosol Sci. 137 105431 Google Scholar
[33]	Moutinho H R, Jiang C S, To B, Perkins, Muller M, Al-Jassim M M, Simpson L 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 172 145 Google Scholar
[34]	Wu S, Altenried S, Zogg A, Zuber F, Maniura K, Ren Q 2018 ACS Omega 3 6456 Google Scholar
[35]	Li D, Li N, Su X, Liu K, Ji P, Wang B 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 489 648 Google Scholar
[36]	Ji Z, Bao L, Wang H, Chen R 2017 Mater. Lett. 207 21 Google Scholar
[37]	Gotlib-Vainstein K, Gouzman I, Girshevitz O, Bolker A, Atar N, Grossman E, Sukenlk, Chaim N 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 3539 Google Scholar
[38]	Du Q, Ai J, Qin Z, Liu J, Zeng X 2018 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 251 188 Google Scholar
[39]	Critchlow G, Webb P, Tremlett C, Brown K 2000 Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 20 113 Google Scholar
[40]	Van Dam J P B, Abrahami S T, Yilmaz A, Gonzalez G, Trrryn H 2020 Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 96 102450 Google Scholar
[41]	Chen J, Qi A, Rodriguez R D, Sheremmet E, Wang Y, Sowade E, Baumann R R, Feng Z 2019 Appl. Surf. Sci. 487 503 Google Scholar
[42]	Quan Y Y, Zhang L Z 2017 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 160 382 Google Scholar
[43]	Chi F T, Liu D J, Wu H Y, Lei J H 2019 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 200 109939 Google Scholar
[44]	Maharjan S, Liao K, Wang A, Barton K, Curran S A 2020 Mater. Chem. Phys. 239 122000 Google Scholar
[45]	Cui H, Zheng Z 2019 Thin Solid Films 691 137612 Google Scholar
[46]	Choi D Y, Jung S H, Song D K, An E J, Park D, Kim T O, Jung J H, Lee H M 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 16495 Google Scholar
[47]	Masuda S, Fujibayashi K, Ishida K, Inaba H 1972 Electr. Eng. Jpn. 92 43 Google Scholar
[48]	Kawamoto H, Uchiyama M, Cooper B L, McKay D S 2011 J. Electrostat. 69 370 Google Scholar
[49]	Kawamoto H, Guo B 2018 J. Electrostat. 91 28 Google Scholar
[50]	Yilbas B S, Al-Qahtani H, Al-Sharafi A, Bahattab S, Kassas M 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 8703 Google Scholar
[51]	Kohli R 2019 Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques (Vol. 11) (Amsterdam: Elsevier) p391
[52]	Manyapu K K, De Leon P, Peltz L, Gaier J R, Waters D 2017 Acta Astronaut. 137 472 Google Scholar
[53]	Kavya K M, Leora P, Pablo D L 2019 J. Space Saf. Eng. 6 248 Google Scholar
[54]	Richard D, Norman J W, Maria K 2018 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Albuquerque, New Mexico, July 8－12, 2018 p183
[55]	Jiang J, Lu Y, Zhao H, Wang L 2019 Acta Astronaut. 165 17 Google Scholar
[56]	Lu Y, Jiang J, Yan X, Wang L 2019 Smart Mater. Struct. 28 085010 Google Scholar
[57]	Zhang J, Zhu C, Lv J, Wei C, Feng J 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 40219 Google Scholar
[58]	Crowder M S, Stover R, Lawitzke A, Devaud G, Dove A, Wang X 2010 Optical System Contamination: Effects, Measurements, and Control San Diego, USA, August 10, 2008 p77940G
[59]	Nguyen T T, Rambanapasi C, Boer A H D, Fruhkubj H W, Ven P, Vries J, Busscher H, Maarschalk K 2010 Int. J. Pharm. 393 89 Google Scholar
[60]	徐阳, 齐振一, 王志浩, 田东波 2019 表面技术 48 167 Google Scholar Xu Y, Qi Z Y, Wang Z H, Tian D P 2019 Surf. Technol. 48 167 Google Scholar
[61]	Gaier J, Waters D L, Misconin R, Banks B, Crowder M 2011 41st International Conference on Environmental System Portland, Oregon, July 17-21, 2011 p5183
[62]	孙旗霞, 杨宁宁, 蔡小兵, 胡更开 2012 力学进展 6 113 Google Scholar Sun Q X, Yang N N, Cai X B, Hu G K 2012 Adv. Mech. 6 113 Google Scholar
[63]	Gaier J R, Jaworske D A 2007 AIP Conference Proc. 880 27 Google Scholar
[64]	Kulvanich P, Stewart P 1987 Int. J. Pharm. 35 111 Google Scholar
[65]	Booth S W, Newton J M 1987 J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 39 679 Google Scholar
[66]	Salazar-Banda G R, Felicetti M A, Concalves J A S, Coury J R, Aguiar M L 2007 Powder Technol. 173 107 Google Scholar
[67]	Markelonis A, Wang J S, Ullrich B U, Chien M W, Brown G J 2014 Appl. Nanoscience 5 457 Google Scholar
[68]	Schulze H, Wahl B, Gottschalk G 1989 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 128 57 Google Scholar
[69]	Kawamoto H, Seki K 2005 Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. C 71 1161 Google Scholar
[70]	Kawamoto H 2012 Proceedings of Earth and Space Conference Shanghai, China, June 8–11, 2012 p94
[71]	王志浩, 白羽, 田东波, 李蔓 2015 装备环境工程 12 75 Google Scholar Wang Z H, Bai Y, Tian D B, Li M 2015 Equip. Environ. Eng. 12 75 Google Scholar
[72]	李青, 任德鹏, 王闯, 张熇 2018 航天器工程 27 137 Google Scholar Li Q, Ren D P, Wang C, Zhang H 2018 Spacecraft Eng. 27 137 Google Scholar

[1]	魏江涛, 杨亮亮, 秦源浩, 宋培帅, 张明亮, 杨富华, 王晓东. 低维纳米材料热电性能测试方法研究. , 2021, 70(4): 047301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201175
[2]	卫毅, 刘飞, 杨奎, 韩平丽, 王新华, 邵晓鹏. 浅海被动水下偏振成像探测方法. , 2018, 67(18): 184202. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180692
[3]	薛丹, 刘金远, 李书翰. 月表尘埃颗粒带电的机理及应用研究. , 2018, 67(13): 135201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180047
[4]	李晓曼, 朴胜春, 张明辉, 刘亚琴, 周建波. 一种基于单水听器的浅海水下声源被动测距方法. , 2017, 66(18): 184301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.184301
[5]	李开, 柳军, 刘伟强. 高超声速飞行器磁控热防护霍尔电场数值方法研究. , 2017, 66(8): 084702. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.084702
[6]	王冬, 郭良浩, 刘建军, 戚聿波. 一种基于warping变换的浅海脉冲声源被动测距方法. , 2016, 65(10): 104302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.104302
[7]	朱良明, 李风华, 孙梅, 陈德胜. 基于频带分解和距离加权的单矢量水听器浅海被动测距方法研究. , 2015, 64(15): 154303. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.154303
[8]	戚聿波, 周士弘, 张仁和, 任云. 一种基于β-warping变换算子的被动声源距离估计方法. , 2015, 64(7): 074301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.074301
[9]	李家琨, 王霞, 金伟其, 张旭. 最小可分辨气体浓度的等效测试评价方法. , 2015, 64(16): 160701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.160701
[10]	丛忠超, 余学峰, 崔江维, 郑齐文, 郭旗, 孙静, 汪波, 马武英, 玛丽娅, 周航. 静态随机存储器总剂量辐射损伤的在线与离线测试方法. , 2014, 63(8): 086101. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.086101
[11]	马骏, 袁操今, 冯少彤, 聂守平. 基于数字全息及复用技术的全场偏振态测试方法. , 2013, 62(22): 224204. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.224204
[12]	韦朴, 周明干, 朱露, 张劲, 王雪峰, 吕东亚, 陈宁, 杨明华, 孙小菡. 螺旋线慢波结构夹持性能测试方法研究. , 2013, 62(9): 094401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.094401
[13]	唐先柱, 钟德镇, 简廷宪, 陆建钢, 谢汉萍. 一种液晶透镜盒间隙的测试方法. , 2013, 62(17): 174210. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.174210
[14]	段芳莉, 杨继明, 仇和兵, 吴聪颖. 表面黏附导致的接触行为转变. , 2012, 61(1): 016201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.016201
[15]	孙健, 刘伟强. 内嵌定向高导热层疏导式结构热防护机理分析. , 2012, 61(12): 124401. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124401
[16]	陈文豪, 杜磊, 庄奕琪, 包军林, 何亮, 陈华, 孙鹏, 王婷岚. 电子器件散粒噪声测试方法研究. , 2011, 60(5): 050704. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.050704
[17]	卿涛, 邵天敏, 温诗铸. 材料表面之间黏附过程分析. , 2007, 56(3): 1555-1562. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1555
[18]	孙健, 白敏冬, 毛程奇, 白希尧. 单极性带电粒子浓度测试方法的研究. , 2007, 56(7): 3972-3976. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3972
[19]	贺朝会, 耿斌, 何宝平, 姚育娟, 李永宏, 彭宏论, 林东生, 周辉, 陈雨生. 大规模集成电路总剂量效应测试方法初探. , 2004, 53(1): 194-199. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.194
[20]	骆建, 殷宏, 陶琨. 连续过渡型多晶物相深度分布的X射线衍射测试方法. , 1995, 44(11): 1788-1792. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1788

计量

文章访问数: 10030
PDF下载量: 240
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板

月尘被动防护技术的最新研究进展