搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于原子重力仪的车载静态绝对重力测量

吴彬 周寅 程冰 朱栋 王凯楠 朱欣欣 陈佩军 翁堪兴 杨秋海 林佳宏 张凯军 王河林 林强

引用本文:
Citation:

基于原子重力仪的车载静态绝对重力测量

吴彬, 周寅, 程冰, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 朱欣欣, 陈佩军, 翁堪兴, 杨秋海, 林佳宏, 张凯军, 王河林, 林强

Static measurement of absolute gravity in truck based on atomic gravimeter

Wu Bin, Zhou Yin, Cheng Bing, Zhu Dong, Wang Kai-Nan, Zhu Xin-Xin, Chen Pei-Jun, Weng Kan-Xing, Yang Qiu-Hai, Lin Jia-Hong, Zhang Kai-Jun, Wang He-Lin, Lin Qiang
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 目前大多数原子重力仪的装置复杂、体积庞大、环境适应性差, 不能应用于野外进行绝对重力测量, 这限制了原子重力仪的应用领域. 本文利用自研的小型化原子重力仪, 集成了一套车载绝对重力测量系统. 该系统主要由原子重力仪、被动平台隔震系统、位姿平台调平系统、差分GPS测高系统、不间断电源供电系统及车载空调温控系统等组成. 首先, 本文对该测量系统的车载环境适应性进行了评估, 发现在野外40 ℃高温、8°大倾角普通路面的环境下, 该系统仍然能够正常工作; 其次, 介绍了车载绝对重力测量的实验步骤及数据处理方法, 并测量了车头朝向对绝对重力测量的影响. 最后, 在野外平坦路面上进行了重复测线工作, 评估了系统的内符合绝对重力测量精度, 结果约为30 μGal; 在野外大倾角山体路面, 通过测量不同海拔高度点的绝对重力值, 得到了地球的垂直重力梯度值, 约为–231(36) μGal/m. 本文结果为野外绝对重力勘测提供了依据.
    Currently, most of the experimental apparatuses of atomic gravimeters are complex in structure, large in size, and poor in environmental adaptability, so that they cannot be used to implement the absolute gravity measurement. Thus, the application areas of atomic gravimeter are greatly limited. In this paper, we integrate a system of absolute gravity measurement on a truck based on a compact homemade atomic gravimeter. This atomic gravimeter has a small size, light weight, low power consumption, and its accuracy is estimated as 10 μGal in the case of laboratory environment. This system consists of atomic gravimeter for gravity measurement, passive isolation platform for vibration suppression, posture platform for tilt adjustment, differential GPS for altitude measurement, UPS for power supply, air-conditioned truck for temperature control and transportation. At first, we estimate the performance of environmental adaptability for this measurement system on the truck, and it is found that this system can still work even at a high field temperature of 40 ℃ and a big tilt angle of 8° for the road. Besides, the experimental procedures of absolute gravity measurement and the methods of processing measured data are introduced. The Coriolis effect is analyzed and the dependence of measured gravity on the orientation of the truck has been measured. Finally, the repeated line measurements are performed on a flat field road. The accuracy of self-coincidence for absolute gravity measurement is evaluated to be 30 μGal and the difference in measured gravity among different locations is about 3080 μGal. Besides, we obtain the vertical gravity gradient of the earth by measuring the absolute gravity values at different altitude sites on a slope road, and the value is estimated to be -231(36) μGal/m. The presented results can provide the basic reference for the field absolute gravity survey.
      通信作者: 程冰, bingcheng@zjut.edu.cn ; 林强, qlin@zjut.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国际级-国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFF0200206, 2017YFC0601602)
      Corresponding author: Cheng Bing, bingcheng@zjut.edu.cn ; Lin Qiang, qlin@zjut.edu.cn
    [1]

    Bouchendira R, Clade P, Guellati-Khelifa S, Nez F, Biraben F 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080801Google Scholar

    [2]

    Parker R H, Yu C, Zhong W, Estey B, Müller H 2018 Science 360 191Google Scholar

    [3]

    Rosi G, Sorrentino F, Cacciapuoti L, Prevedelli M, Tino G 2014 Nature 510 518Google Scholar

    [4]

    Dutta I, Savoie D, Fang B, Venon B, Alzar C L G, Geiger R, Landragin A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 183003Google Scholar

    [5]

    Gustavson T L, Bouyer P, Kasevich M A 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2046Google Scholar

    [6]

    McGuirk J M, Foster G T, Fixler J B, Snadden M J, Kasevich M A 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 033608Google Scholar

    [7]

    Sorrentino F, Bodart Q, Cacciapuoti L, Lien Y H, Prevedelli M, Rosi G, Salvi L, Tino G M 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023607Google Scholar

    [8]

    Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25Google Scholar

    [9]

    Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 1999 Nature 400 849Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hu Z K, Sun B L, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Chen L L, Zhan S, Zhang Q Z, Luo J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043610Google Scholar

    [11]

    Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Muller J, Peters A 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012050Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu X J, Zi F, Dudley J, Bilotta R J, Canoza P, Muller H 2017 Optica 4 1545Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wu B, Wang Z Y, Cheng B, Wang Q Y, Xu A P, Lin Q 2014 Metrologia 51 452Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zhang X W, Zhong J Q, Tang B, Chen X, Zhu L, Huang P W, Wang J, Zhan M S 2018 Appl. Opt. 57 6545Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gillot P, Francis O, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Metrologia 51 L15Google Scholar

    [16]

    Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fu Z J, Wang Q Y, Wang Z Y, Wu B, Cheng B, Lin Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 17 011204Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang S K, Zhao Y, Zhuang W, Li T C, Wu S Q, Feng J Y, Li C J 2018 Metrologia 55 360Google Scholar

    [19]

    Menoret V, Vermeulen P, Le Moigne N, Bonvalot S, Bouyer P, Landragin A, Desruelle B 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 12300Google Scholar

    [20]

    Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Blanchard C, Bonnin A, Cadoret M, Bresson A, Rouxel D, Lequentrec-Lalancette M F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 627Google Scholar

    [21]

    Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Zhu D, Wang Z Y, Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wu X J, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S, Muller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mahadeswaraswamy C 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (California: Stanford University)

    [24]

    Geiger R, Ménoret V, Stern G, Zahzam N, Cheinet P, Battelier B, Villing A, Moron F, Lours M, Bidel Y, Bresson A, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 474Google Scholar

    [25]

    Barrett B, Antoni-Micollier L, Chichet L, Battelier B, Lévèque T, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13786

    [26]

    Becker D, Lachmann M D, Seidel S T, et al. 2018 Nature 562 391Google Scholar

    [27]

    Elliott E R, Krutzik M C, Williams J R, Thompson R J, Aveline D C 2018 NPJ Microgravity 4 7Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wu B, Zhu D, Cheng B, Wu L M, Wang K N, Wang Z Y, Shu Q, Li R, Wang H L, Wang X L, Lin Q 2019 Opt. Express 27 11252Google Scholar

    [29]

    吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 周寅, 翁堪兴, 王肖隆, 林强 2018 67 190302Google Scholar

    Wu B, Cheng B, Fu Z J, Zhu D, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Wang X L, Lin Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 190302Google Scholar

    [30]

    Le Gouet J, Mehlstaubler T E, Kim J, Merlet S, Clairon A, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P 2008 Appl. Phys. B 92 133Google Scholar

  • 图 1  原子重力仪实验装置的照片

    Fig. 1.  Photo of experimental apparatus of atomic gravimeter

    图 2  重力测量灵敏度评估

    Fig. 2.  Evaluation of the sensitivity for gravity measurement

    图 3  基于原子重力仪的车载绝对重力测量系统示意图

    Fig. 3.  Schematic diagram of the system of absolute gravity measurement on a truck based on atomic gravimeter.

    图 4  野外车载绝对重力测量现场照片

    Fig. 4.  Photos of field measurement of absolute gravity on a truck.

    图 5  车厢内外部测量的温度变化曲线

    Fig. 5.  Curves of temperature changes measured inside and outside of the truck.

    图 6  位姿平台倾斜角度的稳定性测试

    Fig. 6.  Stability test of tilt angles of the posture platform.

    图 7  野外测量路线规划 (a)平坦路面; (b)大倾角路面

    Fig. 7.  Route planning of field gravity measurement: (a) Flat road; (b) slope road.

    图 8  科里奥利效应的修正(红点, 实验室内的测量数据; 红线, 正弦拟合; 黑点, 车载情况下的测量数据; 黑线, 正弦拟合)

    Fig. 8.  Correction of Coriolis effect. Red and black dots represent the experimental data measured in the laboratory and the truck. Red and black lines are the corresponding sinusoidal fitted curves.

    图 9  平坦路面情况下的绝对重力测量结果

    Fig. 9.  Measured resultes of absolute gravity in the case of flat road.

    图 10  倾斜路面情况下的绝对重力测量结果

    Fig. 10.  Measured resultes of absolute gravity in the case of slope road.

    Baidu
  • [1]

    Bouchendira R, Clade P, Guellati-Khelifa S, Nez F, Biraben F 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080801Google Scholar

    [2]

    Parker R H, Yu C, Zhong W, Estey B, Müller H 2018 Science 360 191Google Scholar

    [3]

    Rosi G, Sorrentino F, Cacciapuoti L, Prevedelli M, Tino G 2014 Nature 510 518Google Scholar

    [4]

    Dutta I, Savoie D, Fang B, Venon B, Alzar C L G, Geiger R, Landragin A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 183003Google Scholar

    [5]

    Gustavson T L, Bouyer P, Kasevich M A 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2046Google Scholar

    [6]

    McGuirk J M, Foster G T, Fixler J B, Snadden M J, Kasevich M A 2002 Phys. Rev. A 65 033608Google Scholar

    [7]

    Sorrentino F, Bodart Q, Cacciapuoti L, Lien Y H, Prevedelli M, Rosi G, Salvi L, Tino G M 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 023607Google Scholar

    [8]

    Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 2001 Metrologia 38 25Google Scholar

    [9]

    Peters A, Chung K Y, Chu S 1999 Nature 400 849Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hu Z K, Sun B L, Duan X C, Zhou M K, Chen L L, Zhan S, Zhang Q Z, Luo J 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 043610Google Scholar

    [11]

    Freier C, Hauth M, Schkolnik V, Leykauf B, Schilling M, Wziontek H, Scherneck H G, Muller J, Peters A 2016 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 723 012050Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu X J, Zi F, Dudley J, Bilotta R J, Canoza P, Muller H 2017 Optica 4 1545Google Scholar

    [13]

    Wu B, Wang Z Y, Cheng B, Wang Q Y, Xu A P, Lin Q 2014 Metrologia 51 452Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zhang X W, Zhong J Q, Tang B, Chen X, Zhu L, Huang P W, Wang J, Zhan M S 2018 Appl. Opt. 57 6545Google Scholar

    [15]

    Gillot P, Francis O, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P, Merlet S 2014 Metrologia 51 L15Google Scholar

    [16]

    Huang P W, Tang B, Chen X, Zhong J Q, Xiong Z Y, Zhou L, Wang J, Zhan M S 2019 Metrologia 56 045012Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fu Z J, Wang Q Y, Wang Z Y, Wu B, Cheng B, Lin Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 17 011204Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wang S K, Zhao Y, Zhuang W, Li T C, Wu S Q, Feng J Y, Li C J 2018 Metrologia 55 360Google Scholar

    [19]

    Menoret V, Vermeulen P, Le Moigne N, Bonvalot S, Bouyer P, Landragin A, Desruelle B 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 12300Google Scholar

    [20]

    Bidel Y, Zahzam N, Blanchard C, Bonnin A, Cadoret M, Bresson A, Rouxel D, Lequentrec-Lalancette M F 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 627Google Scholar

    [21]

    Fu Z J, Wu B, Cheng B, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Zhu D, Wang Z Y, Lin Q 2019 Metrologia 56 025001Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wu X J, Pagel Z, Malek B S, Nguyen T H, Zi F, Scheirer D S, Muller H 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaax0800Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mahadeswaraswamy C 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (California: Stanford University)

    [24]

    Geiger R, Ménoret V, Stern G, Zahzam N, Cheinet P, Battelier B, Villing A, Moron F, Lours M, Bidel Y, Bresson A, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 474Google Scholar

    [25]

    Barrett B, Antoni-Micollier L, Chichet L, Battelier B, Lévèque T, Landragin A, Bouyer P 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13786

    [26]

    Becker D, Lachmann M D, Seidel S T, et al. 2018 Nature 562 391Google Scholar

    [27]

    Elliott E R, Krutzik M C, Williams J R, Thompson R J, Aveline D C 2018 NPJ Microgravity 4 7Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wu B, Zhu D, Cheng B, Wu L M, Wang K N, Wang Z Y, Shu Q, Li R, Wang H L, Wang X L, Lin Q 2019 Opt. Express 27 11252Google Scholar

    [29]

    吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 周寅, 翁堪兴, 王肖隆, 林强 2018 67 190302Google Scholar

    Wu B, Cheng B, Fu Z J, Zhu D, Zhou Y, Weng K X, Wang X L, Lin Q 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 190302Google Scholar

    [30]

    Le Gouet J, Mehlstaubler T E, Kim J, Merlet S, Clairon A, Landragin A, Dos Santos F P 2008 Appl. Phys. B 92 133Google Scholar

  • [1] 成永军, 董猛, 孙雯君, 吴翔民, 张亚飞, 贾文杰, 冯村, 张瑞芳. 基于7Li冷原子操控的超高真空测量.  , 2024, 73(22): 220601. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241215
    [2] 文艺, 伍康, 王力军. 绝对重力测量中振动传感器振动补偿性能的分析.  , 2022, 71(4): 049101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211686
    [3] 张苏钊, 孙雯君, 董猛, 武海斌, 李睿, 张雪姣, 张静怡, 成永军. 基于磁光阱中6Li冷原子的真空度测量.  , 2022, 71(9): 094204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212204
    [4] 王凯楠, 徐晗, 周寅, 许云鹏, 宋微, 汤鸿志, 王巧薇, 朱栋, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 程冰, 李德钊, 乔中坤, 吴彬, 林强. 基于车载原子重力仪的外场绝对重力快速测绘研究.  , 2022, 71(15): 159101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220267
    [5] 朱栋, 徐晗, 周寅, 吴彬, 程冰, 王凯楠, 陈佩军, 高世腾, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 乔中坤, 王肖隆, 林强. 基于扩展卡尔曼滤波算法的船载绝对重力测量数据处理.  , 2022, 71(13): 133702. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220071
    [6] 程冰, 陈佩军, 周寅, 王凯楠, 朱栋, 楚立, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 吴彬, 林强. 基于冷原子重力仪的绝对重力动态移动测量实验.  , 2022, 71(2): 026701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211449
    [7] 文艺, 伍康, 王力军. 绝对重力测量中振动传感器振动补偿性能的分析.  , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211686
    [8] 程冰, 陈佩军, 周寅, 王凯楠, 朱栋, 楚立, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 吴彬, 林强. 基于冷原子重力仪的绝对重力动态移动测量实验研究.  , 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211449
    [9] 程冰, 周寅, 陈佩军, 张凯军, 朱栋, 王凯楠, 翁堪兴, 王河林, 彭树萍, 王肖隆, 吴彬, 林强. 船载系泊状态下基于原子重力仪的绝对重力测量.  , 2021, 70(4): 040304. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201522
    [10] 何天琛, 李吉. 利用Kapitza-Dirac脉冲操控简谐势阱中冷原子测量重力加速度.  , 2019, 68(20): 203701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190749
    [11] 陈斌, 龙金宝, 谢宏泰, 陈泺侃, 陈帅. 可移动三维主动减振系统及其在原子干涉重力仪上的应用.  , 2019, 68(18): 183301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190443
    [12] 吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 邬黎明, 王凯楠, 王河林, 王兆英, 王肖隆, 林强. 拉曼激光边带效应对冷原子重力仪测量精度的影响.  , 2019, 68(19): 194205. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190581
    [13] 王谨, 詹明生. 基于原子干涉仪的微观粒子弱等效原理检验.  , 2018, 67(16): 160402. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180621
    [14] 吴彬, 程冰, 付志杰, 朱栋, 周寅, 翁堪兴, 王肖隆, 林强. 大倾斜角度下基于冷原子重力仪的绝对重力测量.  , 2018, 67(19): 190302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181121
    [15] 杨威, 孙大立, 周林, 王谨, 詹明生. 用于原子干涉仪实验的锂原子的塞曼减速与磁光囚禁.  , 2014, 63(15): 153701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.153701
    [16] 胡华, 伍康, 申磊, 李刚, 王力军. 新型高精度绝对重力仪.  , 2012, 61(9): 099101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.099101
    [17] 任利春, 周林, 李润兵, 刘敏, 王谨, 詹明生. 不同序列拉曼光脉冲对原子重力仪灵敏度的影响.  , 2009, 58(12): 8230-8235. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8230
    [18] 朱常兴, 冯焱颖, 叶雄英, 周兆英, 周永佳, 薛洪波. 利用原子干涉仪的相位调制进行绝对转动测量.  , 2008, 57(2): 808-815. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.808
    [19] 耿 涛, 闫树斌, 王彦华, 杨海菁, 张天才, 王军民. 用短程飞行时间吸收谱对铯磁光阱中冷原子温度的测量.  , 2005, 54(11): 5104-5108. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5104
    [20] 郑森林, 陈 君, 林 强. 光脉冲序列对三能级原子重力仪测量精度的影响.  , 2005, 54(8): 3535-3541. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3535
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11176
  • PDF下载量:  312
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-11-20
  • 修回日期:  2019-12-18
  • 刊出日期:  2020-03-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map