搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

强激光加载下锡材料微喷颗粒与气体混合回收实验研究及颗粒度分析

辛建婷 赵永强 储根柏 席涛 税敏 范伟 何卫华 谷渝秋

引用本文:
Citation:

强激光加载下锡材料微喷颗粒与气体混合回收实验研究及颗粒度分析

辛建婷, 赵永强, 储根柏, 席涛, 税敏, 范伟, 何卫华, 谷渝秋

Experimental investigation of tin fragments mixing with gas subjected to laser driven shock

Xin Jian-Ting, Zhao Yong-Qiang, Chu Gen-Bai, Xi Tao, Shui Min, Fan Wei, He Wei-Hua, Gu Yu-Qiu
PDF
导出引用
  • 冲击波在金属材料自由面卸载时,材料表面会形成微颗粒向外喷射,这是材料表面一种特殊的破坏形态.在内爆压缩和高压工程领域的相关物理过程中,微喷射颗粒是引起界面混合现象的重要来源,会直接影响后期的混合状态和压缩过程.而微颗粒的尺寸、形态、运动速度等是开展微喷混合过程理论和数值模拟研究的重要参数.由于实验中动态诊断的难度较大,目前已获取的微喷颗粒尺寸及分布数据十分有限.基于神光III原型激光装置,本文设计并开展了强激光驱动冲击加载,锡材料微喷颗粒经过气体区混合后,低密度泡沫材料对微颗粒进行回收分析的实验研究.通过对微喷颗粒回收样品的X光电子计算机断层扫描分析和图像重建,获得了两个典型加载压强条件下与气体混合后微喷颗粒的三维图像,通过与真空实验条件下回收微喷颗粒图像的对比分析,对混合后的微喷颗粒分布形态有了初步的认识;测量统计了回收颗粒尺寸与数目,并通过分析,给出了微喷颗粒尺寸的双指数分布规律.
    When a shock wave reflects from the free surface of a solid sample, fragments may be emitted from the surface. Understanding the process of the fragments mixing with gas is an important subject for current researches in inertial confinement fusion and high pressure science. Particularly, obtaining the fragments size and distribution is important for developing or validating the physical fragmentation model. At present, the reported quantitative data are less due to the great challenges in the time-resolved measurements of the fragments.#br#Recently, high-power laser has appeared as a promising shock loading means for fragment investigation. The advantages existing in such means mainly include small sample (~μm to mm-order), convenient dynamic diagnosis and soft recovery of fragments. Our group has performed the dynamic fragmentation experiments under laser shock loading metal. The ejected fragments under different loading pressures are softly recovered by low density medium of poly 4-methy1-1-pentene (PMP) foam. The sizes, shapes and penetration depths of the fragments are quantitatively analyzed by X-ray micro-tomography and the improved-watershed method.#br#This paper mainly reports the research advances in the process of the fragments mixing with gas. The laser-driven shock experiments of tin sample are performed at Shenguang-Ⅲ prototype laser facility. Under two typical loading pressures, the fragments mixed with gas (N2) are recovered by PMP foam with a density of 200 mg/cm3, and the pressure of gas is 1 atm. The high resolution reconstructed images of the recovered fragments provided by X-ray micro-tomography and computed tomography reconstruction show that the shapes of the fragments are almost homogeneous, and their sizes are in a range of about 1-20 micron. These images are very different from the images of the fragments recovered in vacuum under similar loading pressures. The observed fragments under loading pressure less than 10 GPa in vacuum are some thin layers, while the loading pressure is increased up to more than 30 GPa, a large number of small spherical particles are observed in the front of the recovery fragments, thin layers in the middle, and these spherical particles have diameters ranging from one dozen to several hundreds of micrometers. The sizes and number of fragments are analyzed by the improved watershed method. The resulting distribution of the fragments mixed with gas follows bilinear exponential distribution. Comprehensive analyses of former simulations and our experimental results show that the secondary fragmentation should occur in the process of the fragments mixing with gas.
      Corresponding author: He Wei-Hua, heweihua2004@sina.com;yqgu@caep.ac.cn ; Gu Yu-Qiu, heweihua2004@sina.com;yqgu@caep.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the Science and Technology on Plasma Physics Laboratory, China (Grant No. 9140C680305140C 68289).
    [1]

    Walsh J M, Shreffler R G, Willig F J 1953 J. Appl. Phys. 24 349

    [2]

    Asay J R, Barker L M 1974 J. Appl. Phys. 45 2540

    [3]

    Andriot P, Chapron P, Olive F 1982 AIP Conf. Proc. 78 505

    [4]

    Ogorodnikov V A, Ivanov A G, Mikhailov A L, Kryukov N I, Tolochko A P, Golubev V A 1998 Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 34 696

    [5]

    Zellner M B, Grover M, Hammerberg J E, Hixson R S, Iverson A J, Macrum G S, Morley K B, Obst A W, Olson R T, Payton J R, Rigg P A, Routley N, Stevens G D, Turley W D, Veeser L, Buttler W T 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 013522

    [6]

    Sorenson D S, Minich R W, Romero J L, Tunnell T W, Malone R M 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 5830

    [7]

    Signor L, Rességuier T D, Roy G, Dragon A, Lorca F 2007 AIP Conf. Proc. 955 593

    [8]

    Rességuier T D, Signor L, Dragon A, Boustie M, Berthe L 2008 Appl. Phys. Let. 92 131910

    [9]

    Signor L, Lescoute E, Loison D, Rességuier T D, Dragon A, Roy G 2010 EPJ Web Conf. 6 39012

    [10]

    Signor L, Rességuier T D, Dragon A, Roy G, Fanget A, Faessel M 2010 Int. J. Impact Eng. 37 887

    [11]

    Rességuier T D, Lescoute E, Chevalier J M, Maire P H, Breil J, Schurtz G 2012 AIP Conf. Proc. 1426 1015

    [12]

    Rességuier T D, Lescoute E, Sollier A, Prudhomme G, Mercier P 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 043525

    [13]

    Xin J T, Gu Y Q, Li P, Luo X, Jiang B B, Tan F, Han D, Wu Y Z, Zhao Z Q, Shu J Q, Zhang B H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 236201(in Chinese)[辛建婷, 谷渝秋, 李平, 罗炫, 蒋柏斌, 谭放, 韩丹, 巫殷忠, 赵宗清, 粟敬钦, 张保汉2012 61 236201]

    [14]

    Xin J T, He W H, Shao J L, Li J, Wang P, Gu Y Q 2014 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 47 325304

    [15]

    He W H, Xin J T, Chu G B, Li J, Shao J L, Lu F, Shui M, Qian F, Cao L F, Wang P, Gu Y Q 2014 Opt. Express 22 18924

    [16]

    hang L, Li M, Zhang Y Q, He J, Shen H H, Tao Y H, Tan F L, Zhao J H 2017 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 31 187(in Chinese)[张黎, 李牧, 张永强, 贺佳, 沈欢欢, 陶彦辉, 谭福利, 赵剑衡2017高压 31 187]

    [17]

    Oró D M, Hammerberg J E, Buttler W T, Mariam F G, Morris C, Rousculp C, Stone J B 2012 AIP Conf. Proc. 1426 1351

    [18]

    Wang P, Sun H Q, Shao J L, Qin C S, Li X Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 234703(in Chinese)[王裴, 孙海权, 邵建立, 秦承森, 李欣竹2012 61 234703]

  • [1]

    Walsh J M, Shreffler R G, Willig F J 1953 J. Appl. Phys. 24 349

    [2]

    Asay J R, Barker L M 1974 J. Appl. Phys. 45 2540

    [3]

    Andriot P, Chapron P, Olive F 1982 AIP Conf. Proc. 78 505

    [4]

    Ogorodnikov V A, Ivanov A G, Mikhailov A L, Kryukov N I, Tolochko A P, Golubev V A 1998 Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 34 696

    [5]

    Zellner M B, Grover M, Hammerberg J E, Hixson R S, Iverson A J, Macrum G S, Morley K B, Obst A W, Olson R T, Payton J R, Rigg P A, Routley N, Stevens G D, Turley W D, Veeser L, Buttler W T 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 013522

    [6]

    Sorenson D S, Minich R W, Romero J L, Tunnell T W, Malone R M 2002 J. Appl. Phys. 92 5830

    [7]

    Signor L, Rességuier T D, Roy G, Dragon A, Lorca F 2007 AIP Conf. Proc. 955 593

    [8]

    Rességuier T D, Signor L, Dragon A, Boustie M, Berthe L 2008 Appl. Phys. Let. 92 131910

    [9]

    Signor L, Lescoute E, Loison D, Rességuier T D, Dragon A, Roy G 2010 EPJ Web Conf. 6 39012

    [10]

    Signor L, Rességuier T D, Dragon A, Roy G, Fanget A, Faessel M 2010 Int. J. Impact Eng. 37 887

    [11]

    Rességuier T D, Lescoute E, Chevalier J M, Maire P H, Breil J, Schurtz G 2012 AIP Conf. Proc. 1426 1015

    [12]

    Rességuier T D, Lescoute E, Sollier A, Prudhomme G, Mercier P 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 115 043525

    [13]

    Xin J T, Gu Y Q, Li P, Luo X, Jiang B B, Tan F, Han D, Wu Y Z, Zhao Z Q, Shu J Q, Zhang B H 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 236201(in Chinese)[辛建婷, 谷渝秋, 李平, 罗炫, 蒋柏斌, 谭放, 韩丹, 巫殷忠, 赵宗清, 粟敬钦, 张保汉2012 61 236201]

    [14]

    Xin J T, He W H, Shao J L, Li J, Wang P, Gu Y Q 2014 J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. 47 325304

    [15]

    He W H, Xin J T, Chu G B, Li J, Shao J L, Lu F, Shui M, Qian F, Cao L F, Wang P, Gu Y Q 2014 Opt. Express 22 18924

    [16]

    hang L, Li M, Zhang Y Q, He J, Shen H H, Tao Y H, Tan F L, Zhao J H 2017 Chin. J. High Press. Phys. 31 187(in Chinese)[张黎, 李牧, 张永强, 贺佳, 沈欢欢, 陶彦辉, 谭福利, 赵剑衡2017高压 31 187]

    [17]

    Oró D M, Hammerberg J E, Buttler W T, Mariam F G, Morris C, Rousculp C, Stone J B 2012 AIP Conf. Proc. 1426 1351

    [18]

    Wang P, Sun H Q, Shao J L, Qin C S, Li X Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 234703(in Chinese)[王裴, 孙海权, 邵建立, 秦承森, 李欣竹2012 61 234703]

  • [1] 孙伟, 吕冲, 雷柱, 王钊, 仲佳勇. 磁场对激光驱动的喷流演化影响的二维数值研究.  , 2023, 72(9): 097501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230197
    [2] 岳东宁, 董全力, 陈民, 赵耀, 耿盼飞, 远晓辉, 盛政明, 张杰. 强激光与近临界密度等离子体相互作用中的无碰撞静电冲击波产生.  , 2023, 72(11): 115202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230271
    [3] 岳东宁, 董全力, 陈民, 赵耀, 耿盼飞, 远晓辉, 盛政明, 张杰. 强激光与亚临界密度等离子体相互作用中的近前向散射驱动光子加速机制.  , 2023, 72(12): 125201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222014
    [4] 王云良, 颜学庆. 强激光与固体密度等离子体作用产生孤立阿秒脉冲的研究进展.  , 2023, 72(5): 054207. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222262
    [5] 赵鑫, 杨晓虎, 张国博, 马燕云, 刘彦鹏, 郁明阳. 高功率激光辐照平面靶后辐射冷却效应对等离子体成丝的影响.  , 2022, 71(23): 235202. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220870
    [6] 徐新荣, 仲丛林, 张铱, 刘峰, 王少义, 谭放, 张玉雪, 周维民, 乔宾. 强激光等离子体相互作用驱动高次谐波与阿秒辐射研究进展.  , 2021, 70(8): 084206. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210339
    [7] 税敏, 于明海, 储根柏, 席涛, 范伟, 赵永强, 辛建婷, 何卫华, 谷渝秋. 激光加载下金属锡材料微喷颗粒与低密度泡沫混合实验研究.  , 2019, 68(7): 076201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182280
    [8] 姜炜曼, 李玉同, 张喆, 朱保君, 张翌航, 袁大伟, 魏会冈, 梁贵云, 韩波, 刘畅, 原晓霞, 华能, 朱宝强, 朱健强, 方志恒, 王琛, 黄秀光, 张杰. 纳秒激光等离子体相互作用过程中激光强度对微波辐射影响的研究.  , 2019, 68(12): 125201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190501
    [9] 原晓霞, 仲佳勇. 双等离子体团相互作用的磁流体力学模拟.  , 2017, 66(7): 075202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.075202
    [10] 李彦霏, 李玉同, 朱保君, 袁大伟, 李芳, 张喆, 仲佳勇, 魏会冈, 裴晓星, 刘畅, 原晓霞, 赵家瑞, 韩波, 廖国前, 鲁欣, 华能, 朱宝强, 朱健强, 方智恒, 安红海, 黄秀光, 赵刚, 张杰. 强激光产生的强磁场及其对弓激波的影响.  , 2017, 66(9): 095202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.095202
    [11] 裴晓星, 仲佳勇, 张凯, 郑无敌, 梁贵云, 王菲鹿, 李玉同, 赵刚. 实验室天体物理的验证特例:W43A磁喷流.  , 2014, 63(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.145201
    [12] 王裴, 孙海权, 邵建立, 秦承森, 李欣竹. 微喷颗粒与气体混合过程的数值模拟研究.  , 2012, 61(23): 234703. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.234703
    [13] 郭福明, 宋阳, 陈基根, 曾思良, 杨玉军. 含时量子蒙特卡罗方法研究两电子原子在强激光作用下电子的动力学行为.  , 2012, 61(16): 163203. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.163203
    [14] 辛建婷, 谷渝秋, 李平, 罗炫, 蒋柏斌, 谭放, 韩丹, 巫殷忠, 赵宗清, 粟敬钦, 张保汉. 强激光加载下金属材料微喷回收诊断.  , 2012, 61(23): 236201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.236201
    [15] 何民卿, 董全力, 盛政明, 翁苏明, 陈民, 武慧春, 张杰. 强激光与稠密等离子体作用引起的冲击波加速离子的研究.  , 2009, 58(1): 363-372. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.363
    [16] 汪 敏, 岑豫皖, 胡小方, 余晓流, 朱佩平. 同步辐射计算机断层技术光源误差机理分析.  , 2008, 57(10): 6202-6206. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6202
    [17] 黄仕华, 吴锋民. 外加静电场的聚焦激光脉冲真空加速电子方案.  , 2008, 57(12): 7680-7684. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7680
    [18] 汪 敏, 胡小方, 伍小平. 同步辐射计算机断层技术衬度误差机理分析.  , 2006, 55(8): 4065-4069. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4065
    [19] 苏慧敏, 郑锡光, 王霞, 许剑锋, 汪河洲. 计算机模拟偏振对激光全息的影响.  , 2002, 51(5): 1044-1048. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1044
    [20] 曾贵华, 诸鸿文, 徐至展. 欠稠密等离子体中诱发的偶次相对论谐波.  , 2001, 50(10): 1946-1949. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1946
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5782
  • PDF下载量:  111
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-04-28
  • 修回日期:  2017-06-06
  • 刊出日期:  2017-09-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map