-
测量了10-25 keV电子碰撞厚W, Au靶产生的韧致辐射谱, 并与Monte Carlo程序PENELOPE模拟的X射线谱进行了比较, 除在3 keV前实验谱略低于理论谱外, 整体上两者符合得很好. 在模拟电子与靶材料相互作用产生韧致辐射时, PENELOPE程序中只包含有普通韧制辐射的截面数据. 我们的实验结果表明, 在电子与固体靶相互作用时, 没有明显的极化韧致辐射产生, PENELOPE程序能够可靠地描述电子与固体厚靶相互作用产生的韧致辐射.
-
关键词:
- 电子碰撞 /
- 韧致辐射 /
- Monte Carlo模拟
Bremsstrahlung emission produced by electron impact on thick or thin targets is one of the fundamental radiation processes, and the interest in its study continues to grow because of its importance for understanding the interaction of electrons with matter and also for many practical applications. Nowadays, there has been some disagreement concerning whether or not the polarization bremsstrahlung, which is emitted by the atomic electrons in a target polarized by the incident charged particles, contributes to the total bremsstrahlung when the incident electrons bombard a solid target. Some reports suggested that the polarization bremsstrahlung does not significantly contribute to the total bremsstralung in experiments involving solid targets. However, some recent experimental data indicated that a significant amount of polarization bremsstrahlung contributes to the total bremsstrahlung when electrons from -decays of radioactive nuclei bombard solid targets. In other papers, the comparison between the bremsstrahlung spectra produced by electron impact on different thick solid targets from low-Z to high-Z elements and the simulation spectra of Monte Carlo code PENELOPE showed that there are certain discrepancies between the experimental and simulation results, and on the whole the factors required for the experimental results and simulation spectra to match with each other seem to increase slightly with the target atomic number increasing and for high-Z elements experimental results are about 10% higher than simulation results. PENELOPE is a general-purpose Monte Carlo code that simulates coupled electron-photon transportation, in which simulation for bremsstrahlung is only based on ordinary bremsstrahlung and any contribution from polarization bremsstrahlung is not included Therefore, whether the discrepancies between the experimental and simulation spectra are caused by the polarization bremsstrahlung or by other reasons remains to be further studied. In this paper, we improve the Faraday cup to measure the incident electron charges more accurately Meanwhile, a highpurity Al film of 7.05 m thickness is placed in front of the ultra-thin window of the X-ray silicon drifted detector (SDD) to prevent the backscattered electrons that escape from the side hole of the Faraday cup entering into the SDD detector. The Al film thickness is measured by the method of Rutherford backscattering. In addition, we adopt a data processing method which is different from previous one, to take into account the interaction between backscattered electrons and the window of the SDD detector. New measurements of bremsstrahlung spectra generated by 10-25 keV electron impact, respectively, on thick targets of tungsten and gold are reported in this paper. The experimental data are compared with the simulation results of X-ray spectra obtained from the PENELOPE code, and they are in very good agreement except for the lower energy region ( 3 keV) where the experimental spectra are slightly lower than the simulation spectra. The reason for the small discrepancy for the lower energy region ( 3 keV) is also discussed. The results presented in this paper indicate that the X-ray spectra, which are produced by electron impact on solid targets, do not include obvious contribution of polarization bremsstrahlung, and the PENELOPE code can reliably describe the bremsstrahlung produced by electron impact on solid thick targets.-
Keywords:
- electron impact /
- bremsstrahlung /
- Monte Carlo simulation
[1] Acosta E, Llovet X, Salvat F 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 3228
[2] Matsuyama M, Watanabe K, Hasegawa K {1998 Fusion Eng. Design 39 929
[3] An Z, Hou Q, Long J J 2008 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 266 3643
[4] Tseng H K, Pratt R H 1971 Phys. Rev. A 3 100
[5] Pratt R H, Tseng H K, Lee C M, Kissel L, MacCallum C, Riley M 1977 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20 175
[6] Pratt R H, Tseng H K, Lee C M, Kissel L, MacCallum C, Riley M {1981 Erratum 26 477
[7] Kissel L, Quarles C A, Pratt R H 1983 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 28 381
[8] Seltzer S M, Berger M J 1985 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 12 95
[9] Seltzer S M, Berger M J 1986 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 35 345
[10] Shanker R 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1176
[11] Portillo S, Quarles C A 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 173201
[12] Quarles C A, Portillo S 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1187
[13] Williams S, Quarles C A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062704
[14] Amrit Singh, Dhaliwal A S 2016 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 119 167
[15] Salvat F, Fernndez-Varea J M, Sempau J 2008 PENELOPE-2008, A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport (Issy-les-Moulineau: OECD/NEA Data Bank)
[16] Salvat F, Fernndez-Varea J M, Sempau J, Llovet X 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1201
[17] Llovet X, Sorbier L, Campos C S, Acosta E, Salvat F 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 3844
[18] Acosta E, Llovet X, Coleoni E, Riveros J A, Salvat F 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 6038
[19] Tian L X, Zhu J J, Liu M T, An Z 2009 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 267 3495
[20] Zhao J L, Tian L X, Li X L, An Z, Zhu J J, Liu M T 2015 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 107 47
[21] An Z, Liu M T, Wu Y, Duan Y M 2006 Atomic Energy Science and Technology 40 84 (in Chinese) [安竹, 刘慢天, 吴英, 段艳敏 2006 原子能科学技术 40 84]
[22] Gallagher W J, Cipolla S J 1974 Nucl. Instr. Meth. 122 405
-
[1] Acosta E, Llovet X, Salvat F 2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 3228
[2] Matsuyama M, Watanabe K, Hasegawa K {1998 Fusion Eng. Design 39 929
[3] An Z, Hou Q, Long J J 2008 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 266 3643
[4] Tseng H K, Pratt R H 1971 Phys. Rev. A 3 100
[5] Pratt R H, Tseng H K, Lee C M, Kissel L, MacCallum C, Riley M 1977 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 20 175
[6] Pratt R H, Tseng H K, Lee C M, Kissel L, MacCallum C, Riley M {1981 Erratum 26 477
[7] Kissel L, Quarles C A, Pratt R H 1983 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 28 381
[8] Seltzer S M, Berger M J 1985 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 12 95
[9] Seltzer S M, Berger M J 1986 At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 35 345
[10] Shanker R 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1176
[11] Portillo S, Quarles C A 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 173201
[12] Quarles C A, Portillo S 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1187
[13] Williams S, Quarles C A 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 062704
[14] Amrit Singh, Dhaliwal A S 2016 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 119 167
[15] Salvat F, Fernndez-Varea J M, Sempau J 2008 PENELOPE-2008, A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport (Issy-les-Moulineau: OECD/NEA Data Bank)
[16] Salvat F, Fernndez-Varea J M, Sempau J, Llovet X 2006 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 75 1201
[17] Llovet X, Sorbier L, Campos C S, Acosta E, Salvat F 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 3844
[18] Acosta E, Llovet X, Coleoni E, Riveros J A, Salvat F 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 6038
[19] Tian L X, Zhu J J, Liu M T, An Z 2009 Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 267 3495
[20] Zhao J L, Tian L X, Li X L, An Z, Zhu J J, Liu M T 2015 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 107 47
[21] An Z, Liu M T, Wu Y, Duan Y M 2006 Atomic Energy Science and Technology 40 84 (in Chinese) [安竹, 刘慢天, 吴英, 段艳敏 2006 原子能科学技术 40 84]
[22] Gallagher W J, Cipolla S J 1974 Nucl. Instr. Meth. 122 405
计量
- 文章访问数: 6652
- PDF下载量: 235
- 被引次数: 0