搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

前进接触线薄液膜结构与运移机制

刘乔 黄家宸 王昊 邓亚骏

引用本文:
Citation:

前进接触线薄液膜结构与运移机制

刘乔, 黄家宸, 王昊, 邓亚骏

Structure and migration mechanism of thin liquid film in vicinity of advancing contact line

Liu Qiao, Huang Jia-Chen, Wang Hao, Deng Ya-Jun
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 气-液-固三相接触线薄液膜微观结构认识不清使得动态接触角预测问题始终存在争议. 本文通过大规模分子动力学模拟研究液滴动态润湿过程, 获得了完全浸润液滴前进接触线区域的前驱液膜结构、部分浸润液滴前进接触线区域的纳米级凸起结构. 首次在模拟中获得了微观接触角与宏观接触角随时间的动态演变规律. 分子轨迹追踪揭示了接触线薄液膜区域流体在固体表面摩擦作用下, 随速度增大从滑动为主向滚动为主的模式转变, 进而在底层出现气体裹挟导致滑移、发生溅射的机制. 本研究为进一步构建普适的动态接触角预测模型提供了关键物理依据.
    Thin liquid film near the gas-liquid-solid three phase contact line is the core area of oil and gas production, phase-change heat transfer, and material synthesis systems. Although there are many experimental studies on fluid dynamics in the contact line region, the prediction of contact angle is still difficult, and the bottleneck lies in the special structure of thin liquid film in the contact line region. Because the microstructure of thin liquid film is not well understood, the prediction of dynamic contact angle is always controversial. At present, the main controversial points focus on whether the microscopic contact angle changes with speed, and whether the microscopic contact angle is the same as the macroscopic contact angle. Therefore, it is crucial to monitor the dynamic process of the microscopic contact angle in the thin liquid film region of the contact line. In this work, the wetting system of 50 nm liquid droplets on different solid surfaces is constructed by molecular dynamics simulation, and the structure and migration mechanism of thin liquid film are studied. The structure of the precursor liquid film in the completely wetting droplet advancing contact line region and the nanoscale convex structure in the partially wetting droplet advancing contact line region are obtained. The precursor liquid film is 2–3 molecular layers in thickness, leading the droplet to move forward. However, there is no precursor liquid film in a partially wetting system, and the convex nano-bending larger than 10 nm is formed in the wetting process, resulting in the microscopic contact angle. By comparing the difference between the absolute smooth surface dynamic wetting process and the actual solid surface dynamic wetting process, the dynamic evolution law of the micro contact angle and the macro contact angle with time are obtained for the first time in the simulation. The liquid molecules in the contact line region are tracked and statistically analyzed by means of particle tracer. It is revealed that the liquid molecules in thin liquid film change from sliding mode to rolling mode with speed increasing under the action of solid surface friction, and then the air entrainment at the bottom of the contact line leads to slip and sputtering. The research results are expected to provide theoretical guidance for the following three directions: 1) improving heat transfer efficiency of micro and nano device based on wettability control; 2) improving the imbibition displacement efficiency of shale oil micro-nano matrix based on wettability regulation; 3) constructing universal contact angle prediction model.
      通信作者: 刘乔, liuqiao.syky@sinopec.com
    • 基金项目: 中石化科技部项目(批准号: P23196)、国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2019YFA0705502-4)和中石化石油勘探开发研究院优青项目(批准号: YK-2023-28-2)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Liu Qiao, liuqiao.syky@sinopec.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the Sinopec Science and Technology Department Project, China (Grant No. P23196), the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFA0705502-4), and the Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Development Research Institute Outstanding Youth Project, China (Grant No. YK-2023-28-2).
    [1]

    Wang H, Garimella S V, Murthy J Y 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 50 3933Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wang H 2019 Langmuir 35 10233Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yang W, Brownlow J W, Walker D L, Lu J 2021 Water Resour. Res. 57 e2020WR029522Google Scholar

    [4]

    Mehrizi A A, Wang H 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 107 1Google Scholar

    [5]

    Starov V M 2013 Colloid and Polymer Sci. 291 261Google Scholar

    [6]

    Rao S H, Li Z C, Deng Y J, Huang X, Lu H L 2022 Chem. Eng. J. 450 138120Google Scholar

    [7]

    Hu H, Sun Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 263110Google Scholar

    [8]

    Blake T D 2006 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 299 1Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yu J P, Wang H 2012 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 55 1218Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mohammad Karim A 2022 J. Appl. Phys. 132 080701Google Scholar

    [11]

    Blake T D, Fernandez-Toledano J C, Doyen G, De Coninck J 2015 Phys. Fluids 27 112101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Cox R G 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 168 169Google Scholar

    [13]

    Werder T, Walther J H, Jaffe R L, Halicioglu T, Noca F, Koumoutsakos P 2001 Nano Lett. 1 697Google Scholar

    [14]

    Noble B A, Mate C M, Raeymaekers B 2017 Langmuir 33 3476Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lukyanov A V, Likhtman A E 2016 ACS Nano 10 6045Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yuan Q, Zhao Y P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 246101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Herminghaus S, Pompe T, Fery A 2000 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 14 1767Google Scholar

    [18]

    Yu J P, Wang H, Liu X 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 57 299Google Scholar

    [19]

    Deng Y J, Chen L, Yu J P, Wang H 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 91 1114Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen L, Yu J P, Wang H 2014 ACS Nano 8 11493Google Scholar

    [21]

    Liu Q, Chen L, Deng Y J, Wang H 2017 Chem. Phys. Lett 680 17Google Scholar

    [22]

    Giacomello A, Schimmele L, Dietrich S 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 E262Google Scholar

    [23]

    Marchand A, Chan T S, Snoeijer J H, Andreotti B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 204501Google Scholar

    [24]

    Semal S, Blake T, Geskin V, et al. 1999 Langmuir 15 8765Google Scholar

    [25]

    Santiso E E, Herdes C, Müller E A 2013 Entropy 15 3734Google Scholar

    [26]

    Hoang A, Kavehpour H P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 254501Google Scholar

  • 图 1  液滴在固体基底表面铺展的分子动力学模型, 液滴直径为50 nm. 构建了两种固体基底, 分别是绝对光滑固体基底A, 表面无摩擦; 另一种为晶格结构的固体基底B, 单晶Pt(110)表面, 原子尺度粗糙, 表面有摩擦

    Fig. 1.  Molecular dynamics simulation model of droplet spreading on solid substrates, with a droplet diameter of 50 nm. Two kinds of solid substrates were constructed, one was an absolutely smooth solid substrate A with no friction on the surface; the other was lattice structure solid substrate B with friction, which has atomic scale roughness, single crystal Pt(110).

    图 2  固体A, B表面上不同浸润性液滴在1600 ps时刻动态铺展结构对比, 白色拟合虚线根据液滴球冠状理论所做, 红色为接触线真实形貌, 左上角分别对应各体系平衡态 (a)完全浸润液滴前进接触线区域存在数层分子厚度的前驱液膜; (b)部分浸润液滴前进接触线区域存在纳米凸起结构; (c)部分浸润液滴在绝对光滑固体A表面前进接触线区域没有纳米凸起结构

    Fig. 2.  Comparison of dynamic spreading structures of liquid droplets with different wettability on the surface B at 1600 ps, the white fitted line was based on the droplet spherical crown theory, and the red was the real morphology of the contact line, the upper left corner corresponds to the equilibrium state of each system: (a) There was several molecular-layer thick precursor films in the vicinity of advancing contact line of complete wetting droplet; (b) there was convex nanobending in the vicinity of the advancing contact line of the partially wetting droplet; (c) no convex nanobending structure appeared in the vicinity of the advancing contact line on absolutely smooth surface A.

    图 3  部分浸润液滴在固体A, B表面铺展过程接触角随时间变化. 在绝对光滑A表面, 微观接触角始终保持与静态接触角相同(64°), 不随时间发生变化. 在单晶B表面, 宏观接触角与微观接触角均随时间发生变化, 微观接触角大于宏观接触角, 达到平衡时, 接触角相同

    Fig. 3.  Contact angle changed with time during the spreading process of partial wetting droplets on the surface of solid A and B. On an absolutely smooth A surface, the microscopic contact angle was always the same as the static contact angle (64°) and did not change with time. On the surface of single crystal B, both the macro contact angle and the micro contact angle change with time, and the micro contact angle was larger than the macro contact angle, and the contact angles were similar to equilibrium angle when the equilibrium was reached.

    图 4  液滴在固体B表面不同速度下接触线区域红色粒子运动模式, 液滴主体粒子标记为蓝色, 接触线区域液体分子标记为红色, 固体标记为褐色, 氮气分子标记为粉色 (a)自发铺展液滴, 从t0时刻到(t0+7320) ps时刻平均接触线移动速度0.007 nm/ps; (b)从t0时刻到(t0+1660) ps时刻平均接触线移动速度0.03 nm/ps; (c)从t0时刻到(t0+240) ps时刻平均接触线移动速度0.21 nm/ps. 接触线区域液体分子的运动模式随速度提高, 出现从滑动为主向滚动为主的转变模式, 进一步发生气体入侵导致接触线滑移

    Fig. 4.  Droplet contact line particles movement mode at different velocities on the surface of solid B, the droplet body particles are marked in blue, the liquid molecules in the contact line area are marked in red, the solids are marked in brown, and the nitrogen molecules are marked in pink: (a) Spontaneous spreading droplet with an average contact line moving speed of 0.007 nm/ps from time t0 to time (t0+7320) ps; (b) average contact line moving speed is 0.03 nm/ps from time t0 to time (t0+1660) ps; (c) average contact line moving speed is 0.21 nm/ps from time t0 to time (t0+240) ps. The liquid sliding and rolling modes at the advancing contact line coexist, and tend to be the rolling mode as the speed increases. As the speed increases, air entrainment at the bottom of the contact line causes slippage.

    图 5  (a)平均接触线移动速度0.007 nm/ps时, 接触线处标注红色原子分布百分比方差为34.72%; (b)平均接触线移动速度0.03 nm/ps时, 接触线处标注红色原子分布百分比方差为15.21%

    Fig. 5.  (a) When the average contact line moving speed is 0.007 nm/ps, the variance of the distribution of atoms marked in red at the contact line is 34.72%; (b) when the average contact line moving speed is 0.03 nm/ps, the variance of the distribution of atoms marked in red at the contact line is 15.21%.

    表 1  不同固体表面粗糙度、液固原子间(液态氩、固态铂)相互作用参数和对应的体系平衡接触角

    Table 1.  Surface roughness of different solids, interaction parameters between liquid-solid atoms (argon in liquid state, platinum in solid state) and corresponding equilibrium contact angles of systems.

    表面 均方根粗
    糙度/nm
    εls/(kcal⋅mol–1) σls/nm 平衡接
    触角/(°)
    A 0 0.6130 0.294 64
    B 0.039 0.1346 0.294 64
    1.6996 0.294 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  气液固原子间相互作用参数

    Table 2.  Parameters of gas-liquid-solid atomic interaction.

    原子a原子bεab /(kcal⋅mol–1)σab/nm
    NAr0.03433.3575
    NPt0.08542.8925
    NN0.07403.3100
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Wang H, Garimella S V, Murthy J Y 2007 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 50 3933Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wang H 2019 Langmuir 35 10233Google Scholar

    [3]

    Yang W, Brownlow J W, Walker D L, Lu J 2021 Water Resour. Res. 57 e2020WR029522Google Scholar

    [4]

    Mehrizi A A, Wang H 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 107 1Google Scholar

    [5]

    Starov V M 2013 Colloid and Polymer Sci. 291 261Google Scholar

    [6]

    Rao S H, Li Z C, Deng Y J, Huang X, Lu H L 2022 Chem. Eng. J. 450 138120Google Scholar

    [7]

    Hu H, Sun Y 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 263110Google Scholar

    [8]

    Blake T D 2006 J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 299 1Google Scholar

    [9]

    Yu J P, Wang H 2012 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 55 1218Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mohammad Karim A 2022 J. Appl. Phys. 132 080701Google Scholar

    [11]

    Blake T D, Fernandez-Toledano J C, Doyen G, De Coninck J 2015 Phys. Fluids 27 112101Google Scholar

    [12]

    Cox R G 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 168 169Google Scholar

    [13]

    Werder T, Walther J H, Jaffe R L, Halicioglu T, Noca F, Koumoutsakos P 2001 Nano Lett. 1 697Google Scholar

    [14]

    Noble B A, Mate C M, Raeymaekers B 2017 Langmuir 33 3476Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lukyanov A V, Likhtman A E 2016 ACS Nano 10 6045Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yuan Q, Zhao Y P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 246101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Herminghaus S, Pompe T, Fery A 2000 J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 14 1767Google Scholar

    [18]

    Yu J P, Wang H, Liu X 2013 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 57 299Google Scholar

    [19]

    Deng Y J, Chen L, Yu J P, Wang H 2015 Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 91 1114Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen L, Yu J P, Wang H 2014 ACS Nano 8 11493Google Scholar

    [21]

    Liu Q, Chen L, Deng Y J, Wang H 2017 Chem. Phys. Lett 680 17Google Scholar

    [22]

    Giacomello A, Schimmele L, Dietrich S 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 E262Google Scholar

    [23]

    Marchand A, Chan T S, Snoeijer J H, Andreotti B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 204501Google Scholar

    [24]

    Semal S, Blake T, Geskin V, et al. 1999 Langmuir 15 8765Google Scholar

    [25]

    Santiso E E, Herdes C, Müller E A 2013 Entropy 15 3734Google Scholar

    [26]

    Hoang A, Kavehpour H P 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 254501Google Scholar

  • [1] 张雪松, 范振忠, 仝其雷, 付沅峰. 基于分子模拟方法的纳米气泡溃灭过程分析.  , 2024, 73(20): 204701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241105
    [2] 管星悦, 黄恒焱, 彭华祺, 刘彦航, 李文飞, 王炜. 生物分子模拟中的机器学习方法.  , 2023, 72(24): 248708. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231624
    [3] 张先飞, 王玲玲, 朱海, 曾诚. 自由流体层与多孔介质层界面的盐指现象的统一域法模拟.  , 2020, 69(21): 214701. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200351
    [4] 梁燚然, 梁清. 带电纳米颗粒与相分离的带电生物膜之间相互作用的分子模拟.  , 2019, 68(2): 028701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181891
    [5] 叶学民, 张湘珊, 李明兰, 李春曦. 自润湿流体液滴的热毛细迁移特性.  , 2018, 67(18): 184704. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180660
    [6] 叶学民, 李永康, 李春曦. 平衡接触角对受热液滴在水平壁面上铺展特性的影响.  , 2016, 65(10): 104704. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.104704
    [7] 赵博文, 尚海龙, 陈凡, 石恺成, 李荣斌, 李戈扬. 溅射Al对AlN的润湿与钎焊.  , 2016, 65(8): 086801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.086801
    [8] 李文飞, 张建, 王骏, 王炜. 生物大分子多尺度理论和计算方法.  , 2015, 64(9): 098701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.098701
    [9] 徐威, 兰忠, 彭本利, 温荣福, 马学虎. 微液滴在不同能量表面上润湿状态的分子动力学模拟.  , 2015, 64(21): 216801. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.216801
    [10] 周建臣, 耿兴国, 林可君, 张永建, 臧渡洋. 微液滴在超疏水表面的受迫振动及其接触线的固着-移动转变.  , 2014, 63(21): 216801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.216801
    [11] 刘天庆, 孙玮, 李香琴, 孙相彧, 艾宏儒. 纳米结构表面上部分润湿液滴合并诱导弹跳的理论研究.  , 2014, 63(8): 086801. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.086801
    [12] 张文彬, 廖龙光, 于同旭, 纪爱玲. 溶液液滴蒸发变干的环状沉积.  , 2013, 62(19): 196102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.196102
    [13] 王飞, 刘望, 邓爱红, 朱敬军, 安竹, 汪渊. 界面对ZrN/TaN纳米多层膜固氦性能的影响.  , 2013, 62(18): 186801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.186801
    [14] 王军国, 刘福生, 李永宏, 张明建, 张宁超, 薛学东. 在石英界面处液态水的冲击结构相变.  , 2012, 61(19): 196201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.196201
    [15] 徐升华, 王林伟, 孙祉伟, 王彩霞. 容器内角处流体界面特性与Surface Evolver程序适用性的研究.  , 2012, 61(16): 166801. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.166801
    [16] 向辉, 刘大欢, 阳庆元, 密建国, 仲崇立. 骨架柔性对短链烷烃分子在金属-有机骨架材料中扩散的影响.  , 2011, 60(9): 093602. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.093602
    [17] 张宪刚, 宗亚平, 王明涛, 吴艳. 晶粒生长演变相场法模拟界面表达的物理模型.  , 2011, 60(6): 068201. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068201
    [18] 王冬一, 薛春瑜, 仲崇立. 金属-有机骨架材料二聚铜-苯-1,3,5-三羧酸酯中烷烃扩散机理的分子模拟研究.  , 2009, 58(8): 5552-5559. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5552
    [19] 刘贵立, 郭玉福, 李荣德. ZA27/CNT界面特性电子理论研究.  , 2007, 56(7): 4075-4078. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4075
    [20] 徐 敬. 用分子模拟方法研究羟基乙叉二膦酸(HEDP)在方解石表面的吸附行为.  , 2006, 55(3): 1107-1112. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1107
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2648
  • PDF下载量:  61
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-08-09
  • 修回日期:  2023-09-20
  • 上网日期:  2023-10-10
  • 刊出日期:  2024-01-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map