-
探索低维体系电子态的调控规律可以为构筑下一代微纳电子学器件提供理论基础. 本文采用第一性原理计算研究了一维螺旋型Se原子链的结构性质和电子性质. 结果发现, 该结构比直线型结构能量要低得多, 且具有动力学和热力学稳定性. 能带计算表明, 这种螺旋型一维原子链结构是带隙约为2.0 eV的半导体, 且在X点附近展现出Rashba型的自旋劈裂. 这种特殊的原子链结构便于人们通过应力调控其电子性质. 计算结果表明, 5%的拉伸应变就可以将其带隙减小20%, 而5%的压缩应变将Rashba能量偏移增大到平衡体积时的2倍多. 此外, 其价带是一条平带, 引入空穴掺杂可以诱导产生磁性, 从而使体系转变为半金属. 进一步增加空穴掺杂, 体系转变为铁磁金属. 同样, 这种掺杂效应还出现在一维螺旋型Te原子链中.Tuning the electronic properties of low-dimensional materials is helpful in building nano electronic devices. Here, we investigate the structural and electronic structures of one-dimensional helical Se atomic chain by using first-principles calculations. Our results show that this structure has a much lower energy than the one with a straight-line structure. Our phonon calculations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations suggest that this structure is both dynamically and thermally stable. The band structure shows that it is a semiconductor with a gap of about 2.0 eV and Rashba-type splitting near the X point. The helical structure is good for tuning the electronic properties by using strains. As a result, a 5% strain leads to a 20% change in the band gap while the Rashba energy offset is doubled. Moreover, we find that the valence band is a flat band, over which hole doping can induce ferromagnetism and the system becomes half-metallic. Further increasing the doping level can transform the system into a ferromagnetic metal. Such a strategy is then applied to one-dimensional helical Te atomic chain and similar results are obtained.
-
Keywords:
- one-dimensional atomic chain /
- Rashba effect /
- electronic structure /
- strain tuning /
- flat band
[1] Bychkov Y A, Rashba É I 1984 JETP Lett. 39 78
[2] Datta S, Das B 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 665Google Scholar
[3] Fu L, Kane C L, Mele E J 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 106803Google Scholar
[4] Qi X L, Zhang S C, 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1057Google Scholar
[5] LaShell S, McDougall B A, Jensen E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3419Google Scholar
[6] Koroteev Y M, Bihlmayer G, Gayone J E, Chulkov E V, Blügel S, Echenique P M, Hofmann Ph 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 046403Google Scholar
[7] Ast C R, Henk J, Ernst A, Moreschini L, Falub M C, Pacilé D, Bruno P, Kern K, Grioni M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 186807Google Scholar
[8] Bihlmayer G, Blügel S, Chulkov E V 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 195414Google Scholar
[9] Meier F, Petrov V, Guerrero S, Mudry C, Patthey L, Osterwalder J, Dil J H 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 241408Google Scholar
[10] Yaji K, Ohtsubo Y, Hatta S, Okuyama H, Miyamoto K, Okuda T, Kimura A, Namatame H, Taniguchi M, Aruga T 2010 Nat. Commun. 1 17Google Scholar
[11] Matetskiy A V, Ichinokura S, Bondarenko L V, Tupchaya A Y, Gruznev D V, Zotov A V, Saranin A A, Hobara R, Takayama A, Hasegawa S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 147003Google Scholar
[12] Qin W, Li L, Zhang Z 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 796Google Scholar
[13] 龚士静, 段纯刚 2015 64 187103Google Scholar
Gong S J, Duan C G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 187103Google Scholar
[14] Ming W, Wang Z F, Zhou M, Yoon M, Liu F 2016 Nano Lett. 16 404Google Scholar
[15] Ishizaka K, Bahramy M S, Murakawa H, Sakano M, Shimojima T, Sonobe T, Koizumi K, Shin S, Miyahara H, Kimura A, Miyamoto K, Okuda T, Namatame H, Taniguchi M, Arita R, Nagaosa N, Kobayashi K, Murakami Y, Kumai R, Kaneko Y, Onose Y, Tokura Y 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 521Google Scholar
[16] Chen M, Liu F 2021 Natl. Sci. Rev. 8 nwaa241Google Scholar
[17] Sante D D, Barone P, Bertacco R, Picozzi S 2012 Adv. Mater. 25 509Google Scholar
[18] Meng Y H, Bai W, Gao H, Gong S J, Wang J Q, Duan C G, Chu J H 2017 Nanoscale 9 17957Google Scholar
[19] Hanakata P Z, Rodin A S, Park H S, Campbell D K, Castro Neto A H 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 235312Google Scholar
[20] Iijima S 1991 Nature 34 56Google Scholar
[21] Kondo Y, Takayanagi K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 3455Google Scholar
[22] Dresselhaus M S, Lin Y M, Rabin O, Jorio A, Souza Filho A G, Pimenta M A, Saito R, Samsonidze G G, Dresselhaus G 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 23 129Google Scholar
[23] Qin J K, Liao P Y, Si M, Gao S, Qiu G, Jian J, Wang Q, Zhang S Q, Huang S, Charnas A, Wang Y, Kim M J, Wu W, Xu X, Wang H Y, Yang L, Yap Y K, Ye P D 2020 Nat. Electron. 3 141Google Scholar
[24] Du Y, Qiu G, Wang Y, Si M, Xu X, Wu W, Ye P D 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3965Google Scholar
[25] Ren W, Ye J T, Shi W, Tang Z K, Chan C T and Sheng P 2009 New J. Phys. 11 103014Google Scholar
[26] Hirayama M, Okugawa R, Ishibashi S, Murakami S, Miyake T 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 206401Google Scholar
[27] Han J, Zhang A, Chen M, Gao W, Jiang Q 2020 Nanoscale 12 10277Google Scholar
[28] Andharia E, Kaloni T P, Salamo G J, Yu S Q, Churchill H O H, Barraza-Lopez S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 035420Google Scholar
[29] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[30] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[31] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[32] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[33] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
-
图 1 一维螺旋Se原子链的结构与稳定性 (a)结构的俯视图(上)和侧视图(下)(黑色方框代表原胞); (b) 螺旋型和直线型结构的总能随晶格常数的变化; (c) 螺旋型结构的声子谱; (d) T = 300 K, ab initio分子动力学模拟结果与模拟中的始末状态结构
Fig. 1. Geometric structures and stability of one-dimensional helical Se atomic chain: (a) Top (up) and side (bottom) views of the structure (The black box represents the primitive cell); (b) total energies as a function of the lattice constant for both the helical and linear chains; (c) the simulated phonon spectrum of the helical structure; (d) results from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and the initial and final geometric structures during the simulation at T = 300 K.
图 4 空穴掺杂浓度 Nh对一维螺旋Se原子链结构的影响 (a) 平均每个Se原子的磁矩随 Nh的变化(FM代表铁磁序); (b) Nh = 1.0和(c) Nh = 2.0的能带结构 (虚线代表费米能级)
Fig. 4. Influences of the hole doping concentration Nh on the structure of one-dimensional helical Se atomic chain: (a) The average magnetic momentum per Se atomic vs. Nh (FM denotes the ferromagnetic ordering); band structures with (b) Nh = 1.0 and (c) Nh = 2.0 (The dotted line represents the Fermi level).
-
[1] Bychkov Y A, Rashba É I 1984 JETP Lett. 39 78
[2] Datta S, Das B 1990 Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 665Google Scholar
[3] Fu L, Kane C L, Mele E J 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 106803Google Scholar
[4] Qi X L, Zhang S C, 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1057Google Scholar
[5] LaShell S, McDougall B A, Jensen E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3419Google Scholar
[6] Koroteev Y M, Bihlmayer G, Gayone J E, Chulkov E V, Blügel S, Echenique P M, Hofmann Ph 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 046403Google Scholar
[7] Ast C R, Henk J, Ernst A, Moreschini L, Falub M C, Pacilé D, Bruno P, Kern K, Grioni M 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 186807Google Scholar
[8] Bihlmayer G, Blügel S, Chulkov E V 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 195414Google Scholar
[9] Meier F, Petrov V, Guerrero S, Mudry C, Patthey L, Osterwalder J, Dil J H 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 241408Google Scholar
[10] Yaji K, Ohtsubo Y, Hatta S, Okuyama H, Miyamoto K, Okuda T, Kimura A, Namatame H, Taniguchi M, Aruga T 2010 Nat. Commun. 1 17Google Scholar
[11] Matetskiy A V, Ichinokura S, Bondarenko L V, Tupchaya A Y, Gruznev D V, Zotov A V, Saranin A A, Hobara R, Takayama A, Hasegawa S 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 147003Google Scholar
[12] Qin W, Li L, Zhang Z 2019 Nat. Phys. 15 796Google Scholar
[13] 龚士静, 段纯刚 2015 64 187103Google Scholar
Gong S J, Duan C G 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 187103Google Scholar
[14] Ming W, Wang Z F, Zhou M, Yoon M, Liu F 2016 Nano Lett. 16 404Google Scholar
[15] Ishizaka K, Bahramy M S, Murakawa H, Sakano M, Shimojima T, Sonobe T, Koizumi K, Shin S, Miyahara H, Kimura A, Miyamoto K, Okuda T, Namatame H, Taniguchi M, Arita R, Nagaosa N, Kobayashi K, Murakami Y, Kumai R, Kaneko Y, Onose Y, Tokura Y 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 521Google Scholar
[16] Chen M, Liu F 2021 Natl. Sci. Rev. 8 nwaa241Google Scholar
[17] Sante D D, Barone P, Bertacco R, Picozzi S 2012 Adv. Mater. 25 509Google Scholar
[18] Meng Y H, Bai W, Gao H, Gong S J, Wang J Q, Duan C G, Chu J H 2017 Nanoscale 9 17957Google Scholar
[19] Hanakata P Z, Rodin A S, Park H S, Campbell D K, Castro Neto A H 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 235312Google Scholar
[20] Iijima S 1991 Nature 34 56Google Scholar
[21] Kondo Y, Takayanagi K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 3455Google Scholar
[22] Dresselhaus M S, Lin Y M, Rabin O, Jorio A, Souza Filho A G, Pimenta M A, Saito R, Samsonidze G G, Dresselhaus G 2003 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 23 129Google Scholar
[23] Qin J K, Liao P Y, Si M, Gao S, Qiu G, Jian J, Wang Q, Zhang S Q, Huang S, Charnas A, Wang Y, Kim M J, Wu W, Xu X, Wang H Y, Yang L, Yap Y K, Ye P D 2020 Nat. Electron. 3 141Google Scholar
[24] Du Y, Qiu G, Wang Y, Si M, Xu X, Wu W, Ye P D 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3965Google Scholar
[25] Ren W, Ye J T, Shi W, Tang Z K, Chan C T and Sheng P 2009 New J. Phys. 11 103014Google Scholar
[26] Hirayama M, Okugawa R, Ishibashi S, Murakami S, Miyake T 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 206401Google Scholar
[27] Han J, Zhang A, Chen M, Gao W, Jiang Q 2020 Nanoscale 12 10277Google Scholar
[28] Andharia E, Kaloni T P, Salamo G J, Yu S Q, Churchill H O H, Barraza-Lopez S 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 035420Google Scholar
[29] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[30] Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[31] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758Google Scholar
[32] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[33] Togo A, Tanaka I 2015 Scr. Mater. 108 1Google Scholar
计量
- 文章访问数: 4273
- PDF下载量: 111
- 被引次数: 0