搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

电场诱导(MgO)4储氢的理论研究

尹跃洪 徐红萍

引用本文:
Citation:

电场诱导(MgO)4储氢的理论研究

尹跃洪, 徐红萍

Theoretical study on the hydrogen storage properties of (MgO)4 under external electric field

Yin Yue-Hong, Xu Hong-Ping
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • MgO是具有强极性的离子化合物, 电场诱导MgO吸附H2是一种有效的储氢方法, 但外加的电场很强, 如何降低所需电场的强度是需要解决的关键问题. 本文在密度泛函理论水平上研究了电场中H2在(MgO)4团簇上的吸附性质. 结果表明(MgO)4能承受强电场并保持立方结构, 可用于电场储氢. 电荷分析表明(MgO)4在电场中被极化, 其偶极矩增大为场强0.005 a.u. 和0.010 a.u.时的1.67和3.33 Debye. H2能稳定吸附在单个Mg/O原子上. H2在Mg上为侧位吸附, 而在O上为端位吸附. 外加电场可提高其吸附强度. 仅需0.010 a. u.的外电场, 就可使H2在Mg/O上的吸附能由无电场时–0.118/–0.060 eV提高到–0.225/–0.150 eV. 所需电场强度小于较大尺寸的 (MgO)9团簇, 表明降低团簇尺寸是减少所需电场强度的一种可能方式. 利用QTAIM方法研究了H2与(MgO)4间的弱相互作用, 表明电场使团簇及氢分子极化, 从而增强了其间的静电作用. 当团簇尺寸降低时, 更多的原子位于表面, 且具有较低的配位数, 更容易被极化, 因此储氢所需的电场强度更低. 电场中(MgO)4中最多能吸附16个H2, 相应的质量密度为16.7 wt%, 表明(MgO)4是一种可能的电场储氢材料.
    MgO is a typical ionic compound with strong polarity. Hydrogen absorbed by MgO materials subjected to an external electric field is a potential method to store hydrogen. However, the method requires an extremely high intensity of electric field, which is difficult to achieve. Therefore, reducing field intensity has become a key problem in the field of hydrogen storage. In this paper, the hydrogen storage properties of an (MgO)4 cluster under an external electric field are investigated. The results show that under the external electric field, (MgO)4 keeps the frame of cube structure but with little distortion, which implies that (MgO)4 cluster can sustain the strong electric field. The (MgO)4 is also polarized by the external electric field and its dipole momentum increases to 1.67 and 3.33 Debye when the field intensity is 0.005 and 0.010 a.u., respectively. H2 can be adsorbed on a single Mg/O atom: H2 is adsorbed at lateral position of Mg atom, while at the top of O atom. The adsorption strength is substantially enhanced under an external electric field. Under only 0.010 a. u. of electric field, the adsorption energy of H2 on the Mg or O atoms increases from –0.118 eV to –0.225 eV or from –0.060 eV to –0.150 eV, respectively. The electric field required is significantly lower than that of a large (MgO)9 cluster. This result suggests that reducing the size of material is a possible method toreduce the electric field for hydrogen storage in polarizable materials. The weak interaction between H2 and (MgO)4 is analyzed by the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. The results indicate that under an electric field, (MgO)4 and H2 are effectively polarized, and the electrostatic interaction between them is subsequently enhanced. Meanwhile, the small cluster is easily polarized because most of the atoms are in the surface and have low coordination. Therefore, the electric field required can be substantially reduced. Moreover, (MgO)4 adsorbs 16 H2 molecules at most. The corresponding mass density of hydrogen storage reaches 16.7 wt%, indicating that (MgO)4 can be used as a hydrogen storage material under an electric field.
      通信作者: 徐红萍, xhpwlx8@126.com
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11164024, 11164034)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Xu Hong-Ping, xhpwlx8@126.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11164024, 11164034).
    [1]

    Lubitz W, Tumas W 2007 Chem. Rev. 107 3900Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yu X, Tang Z, Sun D, Ouyang L, Zhu M 2017 Prog. Mater. Sci. 88 1Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ren J, Musyoka N M, Langmi H W, Mathe M, Liao S 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 289Google Scholar

    [4]

    Jena P 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 206Google Scholar

    [5]

    Bhatia S K, Myers A L 2006 Langmuir 22 1688Google Scholar

    [6]

    Ao Z M, Hernandez-Nieves A D, Peeters F M, Li S 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 1463Google Scholar

    [7]

    Guo J H, Zhang H 2011 Struct. Chem. 22 1039Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zhou J, Wang Q, Sun Q, Jena P, Chen X S 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 2801Google Scholar

    [9]

    Sun X, Jiann Y H, Shang Z S 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 7178Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ao Z M, Peeters F M 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 14503

    [11]

    Liu W, Zhao Y H, Nguyen J, Li Y, Jiang Q, Lavernia E J 2009 Carbon 47 3452Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu G, Zhang J, Wu Y, Li Q, Chou K, Bao X 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 480 788Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dawoud J N, Sallabi A K, Fasfous I I, Jack D B 2009 e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 7 207Google Scholar

    [14]

    Larese J Z, Frazier L, Adams M A, Arnold T, Hinde R J, Ramirez-Cuesta A 2006 Phys. B: Cond. Matter 385 144

    [15]

    Skofronick J G, Toennies J P, Traeger F, Weiss H 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 035413Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sawabe K, Koga N, Morokuma K, Iwasawa Y 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 101 4819Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang G, Sheng Y 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 093601

    [18]

    Kwapien K, Sierka M, Dbler J, Sauer J 2010 Chem. Cat. Chem. 2 819

    [19]

    陈宏善, 陈华君 2011 60 073601Google Scholar

    Chen H S, Chen H J 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 073601Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yin Y H, Chen H S 2016 Comput. Theor. Chem. 108 1

    [21]

    Roberts C, Johnston R L 2001 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 5024Google Scholar

    [22]

    de La Puente E, Aguado A, Ayuela A, López J M 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 7607Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ziemann P J, Castleman Jr A W 1991 J. Chem. Phys. 94 718Google Scholar

    [24]

    Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar

    [25]

    Miehlich B, Savin A, Stoll H, Preuss H 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 200Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ditchfield R, Hehre W J, Pople J A 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 724Google Scholar

    [27]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G, Schlegel H, et al. 2013 Gaussian09 Revision D.01 Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc.

    [28]

    Delley B 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 508Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu T, Chen F 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar

    [30]

    Castleman Jr A W, Khanna S N 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2664

  • 图 1  不同场强下(MgO)4的稳定结构(原子颜色与电荷得失相关, 由蓝色至红色表示失电子越多到得电子越多)

    Fig. 1.  The stable structures of (MgO)4 under the electric fields with different intensities(the color is correlated with the gaining or losing of electrons, from blue to red, it represents the variation of from the losing to obtaining electrons).

    图 2  不同场强条件下H2在(MgO)4上的稳定吸附结构 (绿色球Mg原子; 红色球O原子; 灰色球H原子)

    Fig. 2.  The stable structures of H2 adsorbed on (MgO)4 under the electric fields with different intensities (the green, red and gray balls are the Mg, O and H atoms, respectively)

    图 3  场强为0.010 a.u. H2吸附在Mg上时总能量随时间的演化(附图中为演化始末的吸附结构)

    Fig. 3.  The variation in the energy for the structure of H2 adsorbed on Mg atom under the electric field with the intensity of 0.010 a. u.(the adsorbed structures are also presented in attached map)

    图 4  F = 0.010 a.u. 电场中H2在Mg/O上稳定吸附结构的临界点 (蓝色球为核临界点, 绿色球为键临界点; 红色球为环临界点)

    Fig. 4.  The critical points for the stable adsorption structures of H2 on Mg/O under the electric field with F = 0.010 a.u.(the blue, green and red balls represent the nuclear, bond and ring critical points, respectively)

    图 5  F = 0.010 a. u. 电场中H2在Mg/O离子上吸附结构的RDG等能面

    Fig. 5.  The RDG isosurface for the adsorption structures of H2 on Mg/O under the electric field with F = 0.010 a. u.

    图 6  F = 0.010 a. u. 电场中H2在Mg/O离子上吸附结构的填色RDG等能面

    Fig. 6.  The color-filled map of RDG isosurface for the adsorption structures of H2 on Mg/O under the electric field with F = 0.010 a. u.

    图 7  H2在Mg (a)和O (b)原子上吸附结构的电荷密度差分

    Fig. 7.  The color-filled contours of charge density difference for adsorption structures of H2 on Mg (a) and O (b), respectively

    图 8  F = 0.010 a.u. (MgO)4吸附16个H2的稳定结构(绿色球为Mg原子, 红色球为O原子; 灰色球为H原子)

    Fig. 8.  The adsorption structures of 16 H2 on (MgO)4 under the electrical field with the intensity of 0.010 a. u. (the green, red and grey balls are Mg, O and H atoms, respectively).

    表 1  不同场强下(MgO)4中两类Mg/O原子的NPA 电荷(e)及Mg—O键长(Å) (QMgI/QMgIIQOI/QOII分别是Mg2, Mg4, Mg8/Mg6和O3, O5, O7/O1上的电荷; Mg—O键长RI = R12 = R14 = R18 = R63 = R65 = R67, 而RII = R23 = R25 = R43 = R47 = R85 = R87)

    Table 1.  The NPA charges for the two types of Mg/O atoms and the Mg—O distances (QMgI/QMgII and QOI/QOII are the charges of Mg2, Mg4, Mg8/Mg6 and O3, O5, O7/O1, respectively. The Mg—O distances RI = R12 = R14 = R18 = R63 = R65 = R67, while RII = R23 = R25 = R43= R47 = R85 = R87).

    F/a.u.QMgI/QMgIIQOI/QOIIRIRII
    01.493/1.493–1.493/–1.4931.961.96
    0.0051.476/1.527–1.484/–1.5031.941.97
    0.0101.460/1.554–1.474/–1.5121.931.99
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  H2在(MgO)4上的吸附能、到团簇距离RH-Mg/O, H—H键长RH—H及H和H2的NPA 电荷

    Table 2.  The adsorption energies Ea, H—H bond lengths RH—H, distances between H2 and cluster RH2-Mg/O and NPA charges of H atoms and H2 for (MgO)4H2

    SiteF/a. u.Ea/eVRH—HRH—Mg/OQHQH2
    H2 on Mg0–0.1180.7512.2170.023/0.0230.046
    0.005–0.1720.7522.1790.030/0.0300.060
    0.010–0.2250.7532.0930.044/0.0440.088
    H2 on O0–0.0600.7502.3650.044/–0.068–0.024
    0.005–0.1010.7552.2480.069/–0.110–0.041
    0.010–0.1500.7632.1360.094/–0.157–0.063
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  H2在(MgO)4上吸附结构的拓扑参数

    Table 3.  The topological parameters for the adsorption structures of H2 on (MgO)4

    F/a. u.H2 on MgH2 on O
    BCPρ${\nabla ^2}\rho $H(r)ELFBCPρ${\nabla ^2}\rho $H(r)ELF
    0.000Mg—H0.0130.0590.0020.029O—H0.0110.0380.0020.045
    H—H0.266–1.167–0.2921.000H—H0.265–1.167–0.2921.000
    Mg—O0.0560.4030.0050.057Mg—O0.0560.4030.0050.057
    0.005Mg—H0.0140.0630.0020.031O—H0.0150.0490.0020.060
    H—H0.260–1.165–0.2921.000H—H0.261–1.142–0.2871.000
    Mg—O0.054—0.0590.382—0.4260.004—0.0050.056—0.059Mg—O0.055—0.0590.390—0.4270.004—0.0050.057—0.059
    0.010Mg—H0.0160.0690.0020.034O—H0.0190.0630.0020.080
    H—H0.255–1.162–0.2910.999H—H0.255–1.102–0.2780.999
    Mg—O0.051—0.0610.341—0.5330.004—0.0050.055—0.060Mg—O0.025—0.0610.358—0.4440.004—0.0050.054—0.060
    下载: 导出CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Lubitz W, Tumas W 2007 Chem. Rev. 107 3900Google Scholar

    [2]

    Yu X, Tang Z, Sun D, Ouyang L, Zhu M 2017 Prog. Mater. Sci. 88 1Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ren J, Musyoka N M, Langmi H W, Mathe M, Liao S 2017 Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 289Google Scholar

    [4]

    Jena P 2011 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2 206Google Scholar

    [5]

    Bhatia S K, Myers A L 2006 Langmuir 22 1688Google Scholar

    [6]

    Ao Z M, Hernandez-Nieves A D, Peeters F M, Li S 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 1463Google Scholar

    [7]

    Guo J H, Zhang H 2011 Struct. Chem. 22 1039Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zhou J, Wang Q, Sun Q, Jena P, Chen X S 2010 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 2801Google Scholar

    [9]

    Sun X, Jiann Y H, Shang Z S 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 7178Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ao Z M, Peeters F M 2010 J. Phys. Chem. C 114 14503

    [11]

    Liu W, Zhao Y H, Nguyen J, Li Y, Jiang Q, Lavernia E J 2009 Carbon 47 3452Google Scholar

    [12]

    Wu G, Zhang J, Wu Y, Li Q, Chou K, Bao X 2009 J. Alloys Compd. 480 788Google Scholar

    [13]

    Dawoud J N, Sallabi A K, Fasfous I I, Jack D B 2009 e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 7 207Google Scholar

    [14]

    Larese J Z, Frazier L, Adams M A, Arnold T, Hinde R J, Ramirez-Cuesta A 2006 Phys. B: Cond. Matter 385 144

    [15]

    Skofronick J G, Toennies J P, Traeger F, Weiss H 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 035413Google Scholar

    [16]

    Sawabe K, Koga N, Morokuma K, Iwasawa Y 1994 J. Chem. Phys. 101 4819Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhang G, Sheng Y 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 093601

    [18]

    Kwapien K, Sierka M, Dbler J, Sauer J 2010 Chem. Cat. Chem. 2 819

    [19]

    陈宏善, 陈华君 2011 60 073601Google Scholar

    Chen H S, Chen H J 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 073601Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yin Y H, Chen H S 2016 Comput. Theor. Chem. 108 1

    [21]

    Roberts C, Johnston R L 2001 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 5024Google Scholar

    [22]

    de La Puente E, Aguado A, Ayuela A, López J M 1997 Phys. Rev. B 56 7607Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ziemann P J, Castleman Jr A W 1991 J. Chem. Phys. 94 718Google Scholar

    [24]

    Becke A D 1993 J. Chem. Phys. 98 5648Google Scholar

    [25]

    Miehlich B, Savin A, Stoll H, Preuss H 1989 Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 200Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ditchfield R, Hehre W J, Pople J A 1971 J. Chem. Phys. 54 724Google Scholar

    [27]

    Frisch M J, Trucks G, Schlegel H, et al. 2013 Gaussian09 Revision D.01 Wallingford CT: Gaussian, Inc.

    [28]

    Delley B 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 92 508Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu T, Chen F 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580Google Scholar

    [30]

    Castleman Jr A W, Khanna S N 2009 J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2664

  • [1] 孟现文. 电场方向对一维断裂纳米通道连接处水桥结构的影响.  , 2024, 73(9): 093102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240027
    [2] 刘晨曦, 庞国旺, 潘多桥, 史蕾倩, 张丽丽, 雷博程, 赵旭才, 黄以能. 电场对GaN/g-C3N4异质结电子结构和光学性质影响的第一性原理研究.  , 2022, 71(9): 097301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212261
    [3] 吴建冬, 程智, 叶翔宇, 李兆凯, 王鹏飞, 田长麟, 陈宏伟. 金刚石氮-空位色心单电子自旋的电场驱动相干控制研究.  , 2022, 0(0): . doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220410
    [4] 吴建冬, 程智, 叶翔宇, 李兆凯, 王鹏飞, 田长麟, 陈宏伟. 金刚石氮-空位色心单电子自旋的电场驱动相干控制.  , 2022, 71(11): 117601. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20220410
    [5] 马丽娟, 韩婷, 高升启, 贾建峰, 武海顺. 单缺陷对Sc, Ti, V修饰石墨烯的结构及储氢性能的影响.  , 2021, 70(21): 218802. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210727
    [6] 元丽华, 巩纪军, 王道斌, 张材荣, 张梅玲, 苏俊燕, 康龙. 碱金属修饰的多孔石墨烯的储氢性能.  , 2020, 69(6): 068802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20190694
    [7] 周晓锋, 方浩宇, 唐春梅. 三明治结构graphene-2Li-graphene的储氢性能.  , 2019, 68(5): 053601. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181497
    [8] 祁鹏堂, 陈宏善. Li修饰的C24团簇的储氢性能.  , 2015, 64(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.238102
    [9] 尹跃洪, 陈宏善, 宋燕. 电场诱导(MgO)12储氢的从头计算研究.  , 2015, 64(19): 193601. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.193601
    [10] 凌智钢, 唐延林, 李涛, 李玉鹏, 魏晓楠. 外电场下二氧化锆的分子结构及其特性.  , 2014, 63(2): 023102. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.023102
    [11] 凌智钢, 唐延林, 李涛, 李玉鹏, 魏晓楠. 外电场下2,2,5,5-四氯联苯的分子结构与电子光谱.  , 2013, 62(22): 223102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.223102
    [12] 赵银昌, 戴振宏, 隋鹏飞, 张晓玲. 二维Li+BC3结构高储氢容量的研究.  , 2013, 62(13): 137301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.137301
    [13] 左应红, 王建国, 朱金辉, 牛胜利, 范如玉. 爆炸电子发射初期阴极表面电场的研究.  , 2012, 61(17): 177901. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.177901
    [14] 颜克凤, 李小森, 孙丽华, 陈朝阳, 夏志明. 储氢笼型水合物生成促进机理的分子动力学模拟研究.  , 2011, 60(12): 128801. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.128801
    [15] 叶佳宇, 刘亚丽, 王靖林, 何垚. Zr催化剂对NaAlH4和Na3AlH6可逆储氢性能的影响.  , 2010, 59(6): 4178-4185. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4178
    [16] 刘秀英, 王朝阳, 唐永建, 孙卫国, 吴卫东, 张厚琼, 刘淼, 袁磊, 徐嘉靖. 单壁BN纳米管和碳纳米管物理吸附储氢性能的理论对比研究.  , 2009, 58(2): 1126-1131. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1126
    [17] 秦晓刚, 贺德衍, 王骥. 基于Geant 4的介质深层充电电场计算.  , 2009, 58(1): 684-689. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.684
    [18] 阮 文, 罗文浪, 张 莉, 朱正和. 外电场作用下苯乙烯分子结构和电子光谱.  , 2008, 57(10): 6207-6212. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6207
    [19] 唐元洪, 林良武, 郭 池. 多壁碳纳米管束储氢机理的X射线吸收谱研究.  , 2006, 55(8): 4197-4201. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4197
    [20] 郑 宏, 王绍青, 成会明. 微孔对单壁纳米碳管储氢性能的影响.  , 2005, 54(10): 4852-4856. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.4852
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8175
  • PDF下载量:  64
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-04-16
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-09
  • 上网日期:  2019-08-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-08-20

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map