搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

多轴差分吸收光谱技术测量NO2对流层垂直分布及垂直柱浓度

王杨 李昂 谢品华 陈浩 牟福生 徐晋 吴丰成 曾议 刘建国 刘文清

引用本文:
Citation:

多轴差分吸收光谱技术测量NO2对流层垂直分布及垂直柱浓度

王杨, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 牟福生, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 曾议, 刘建国, 刘文清

Measuring tropospheric vertical distribution and vertical column density of NO2 by multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy

Wang Yang, Li Ang, Xie Pin-Hua, Chen Hao, Mou Fu-Sheng, Xu Jin, Wu Feng-Cheng, Zeng Yi, Liu Jian-Guo, Liu Wen-Qing
PDF
导出引用
  • 研究了多轴差分吸收光谱技术(MAX-DOAS)的对流层NO2垂直廓线及垂直柱浓度反演方法. 该方法采用了先反演气溶胶廓线, 然后在此基础上反演痕量气体垂直分布的两步反演方法. 其中痕量气体廓线反演时采用了非线性最优估算法, 使反演更少地依赖于先验信息, 更有利于自动获取痕量气体廓线. 首先研究了应用非线性最优估算法的痕量气体垂直廓线反演算法中权重函数、 先验廓线及其协方差矩阵的计算方法, 设计了适合于痕量气体垂直分布变化剧烈地区的迭代方案. 通过计算机仿真, 研究了算法重建盒子型和抬高型NO2廓线的效果, 研究表明两种典型分布下算法都可以较好地重建2 km以下的NO2分布, 在近地面的反演精度达到0.6%. 然后在低气溶胶、高气溶胶和抬高型气溶胶三种典型条件下, 研究了算法重建同一NO2廓线的效果, 研究表明不同气溶胶条件下反演算法都可以得到相似的结果. 分析了错误的气溶胶状态对于NO2廓线反演的影响以及反演算法的误差来源. 在合肥地区开展连续观测实验, 并将观测的NO2垂直柱浓度与卫星对比, 相关性系数达到了0.85. 将MAX-DOAS反演的近地面NO2 浓度与长程DOAS 结果对比, 相关性系数达到0.76. 此外简化的MAX-DOAS痕量气体垂直柱浓度反演方法中常采用固定典型的气溶胶状态, 将两步法结果与简化方法结果进行对比, 两者的最大相对偏差为112%. 因此准确获取气溶胶状态, 尤其是气溶胶光学厚度, 对准确反演对流层NO2垂直柱浓度十分必要.
    The inversion method of the vertical profile and vertical column density (VCD) of tropospheric NO2 using multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) is investigated in this paper. An inversion method of two-step procedure is operated. In this method firstly the aerosol vertical profile is retrieved. Then the vertical distribution of trace gases is retrieved based on the corresponding aerosol status. Nonlinear optimal estimation algorithm is extended to acquire NO2 profile to reduce the dependence of the inversion on priori information. It is more advantageous to automatically obtain trace gases profile. At first we investigate how to calculate some parameters (weighting function, the covariance matrices of measurement, and a priori information) of the algorithm and design nonlinear iteration strategy suited to the region where NO2 vertical distribution usually shows rapid variation. Then this inversion algorithm is verified by computer simulation in the cases of box profile and elevated profile of NO2. It is indicated that the distribution of NO2 below 2 km could be well rebuilt and the retrieval accuracy of surface-near NO2 volume mixing ratio is 0.6%. The study of how accurately this algorithm can rebuild the same true profile in three aerosol status of low aerosol, high aerosol and elevated aerosol indicates that similar retrieval results could be acquired. In addition, the effect of wrong aerosol status on the retrieving of NO2 profile and the error sources of this algorithm are analyzed. After that a continuous observation is reported in the city of Hefei. NO2 VCDs derived from MAX-DOAS are compared with those from satellite observations, and the correlation coefficient is 0.85. The surface-near NO2 concentrations measured by MAX-DOAS are compared with those from LP-DOAS, and the correlation coefficient is 0.76. In addition, the simplified MAX-DOAS inversion method of obtaining the trace gas profile usually uses invariable typical aerosol status as input. The comparison with the tropospheric NO2 VCD from simplified method indicates that the using of invariable typical aerosol status would cause large deviation of NO2 VCD, and its maximum relative deviation is about 112%. So exactly acquiring aerosol status, aerosol optical density especially, is necessary to exactly retrieve tropospheric NO2 vertical column density.
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 41275038)、环保公益性项目(批准号: 201109007) 和安徽省自然 科学基金(批准号: 1308085QF124)资助的课题.
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41275038), the Special Project of Environmental Nonprofit Industry Research, China (Grant No. 201109007), and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. 1308085QF124).
    [1]

    Crutzen P J 1979 Earth Planet. Sci. 7 443

    [2]

    Hönninger G, von Friedeburg C, Platt U 2004 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4 231

    [3]

    Wang Y, Xie P H, Li A, Zeng Y, Xu J, Si F Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 114209 (in Chinese) [王杨, 谢品华, 李昂, 曾议, 徐晋, 司福祺 2012 61 114209]

    [4]

    Wang Y, Li A, Xie P H, Zeng Y, Wang R B, Chen H, Pei X, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 114211

    [5]

    Ma J Z, Beirle S, Jin J L, Shaiganfar R, Yan P, Wagner T 2012 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12 26719

    [6]

    Zhou H J, Liu W Q, Si F Q, Xie P H, Xu J, Dou K 2011 Acta Opt. Sin. 31 1101007 (in Chinese) [周海金, 刘文清, 司福祺, 谢品华, 徐晋, 窦科 2011 光学学报 31 1101007]

    [7]

    Li A, Xie P H, Liu C, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 2859

    [8]

    Fu Q, Liu W Q, Si F Q, Zhang Y H, Xie P H 2009 Acta Photon. Sin. 38 1216 (in Chinese) [付强, 刘文清, 司福祺, 张英华, 谢品华 2009 光子学报 38 1216]

    [9]

    Xu J, Xie P H, Si F Q, Dou K, Li A, Liu Y, Liu W Q 2010 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 30 2464 (in Chinese) [徐晋, 谢品华, 司福祺, 窦科, 李昂, 刘宇, 刘文清 2010 光谱学与光谱分析 30 2464]

    [10]

    Eskes H J, Boersma K F 2003 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 3 895

    [11]

    Irie H, Kanaya Y, Akimoto H, Lwabuchi H, Shimiza A, Aoki K 2008 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 341

    [12]

    Wagner T, Beirle S, Brauers T, Deutschmann T, Frieß U, Hak C, Halla J D, Heue K P, Junkermann W, Li X, Platt U, Pundt-Gruber I 2011 Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 4 3891

    [13]

    Li X, Brauers T, Hofzumahaus A, Lu K, Li Y P, Shao M, Wagner T, Wahner A 2012 Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12 3983

    [14]

    Frieß U, Sihler H, Sander R, Pohler D, Yilmaz S, Platt U 2011 J. Geophys. Res. 116 D00R04

    [15]

    Sinreich R, Frieß U, Wagner T, Platt U 2005 Faraday Discuss. 130 153

    [16]

    Wang Y, Li A, Xie P H, Chen H, Xu J, Wu F C, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 180705 (in Chinese) [王杨, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 刘建国, 刘文清 2013 62 180705]

    [17]

    Rozanov A, Rozanov V, Buchwitz M, Kokhanovsky A, Burrows J P 2005 Adv. Space Res. 36 1015

    [18]

    Brhl C, Crutzen P J 1993 MPIC Two-Dimensional Model in the Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft (Vol. 1292) (Washington: NASA Ref. Publ.) p103

    [19]

    Rodgers C D 2000 Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, Ser. Atmos. Oceanic Planet. Phys. (Vol. 2) (Hackensack: World Sci. Publ.)

    [20]

    Clemer K, van Roozendael M, Fayt C, Hendrick F, Hermans C, Pinardi G, Spurr R, Wang P, Maziere M D 2010 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 3 863

    [21]

    Frieß U, Monks P S, Remedios J J, Rozanov A, Sinreich R, Wagner T, Platt U 2006 J. Geophys. Res. 111 D14203

    [22]

    Solomon S, Schmeltekopf A L, Sanders R W 1987 J. Geophys. Res. 92 8311

    [23]

    Kraus S 2006 Ph. D. Dissertation (Mannheim: University of Mannheim)

    [24]

    Greenblatt G D, Orlando J J, Burkholder J B, Ravis-hankara A R 1990 J. Geophys. Res. 95 18577

    [25]

    Vandaele A C, Hermans C, Simon P C, Carleer M, Colins R, Fally S, M’erienne M F, Jenouvrier A, Coquart B 1998 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 59 171

    [26]

    Bogumil K, Orphal J, Homann T, Voigt S, Spietz P, Fleischmann O C, Vogel A, Hart-mann M, Bovensmann H, Frerik J, Burrows J P 2003 J. Photoch. Photobio. A 157 157

    [27]

    Meller R and Moortgat G K 2000 J. Geophys. Res. 105 7089

    [28]

    Kneizys F X, Shettle E P, Abreu L W, Chetwynd J H, Anderson G P, Gallery W O, Selby J E A, Clough S A Users Guide to LOWTRAN 7 www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a206773.pdf. [2013-05-10]

  • [1]

    Crutzen P J 1979 Earth Planet. Sci. 7 443

    [2]

    Hönninger G, von Friedeburg C, Platt U 2004 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4 231

    [3]

    Wang Y, Xie P H, Li A, Zeng Y, Xu J, Si F Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 114209 (in Chinese) [王杨, 谢品华, 李昂, 曾议, 徐晋, 司福祺 2012 61 114209]

    [4]

    Wang Y, Li A, Xie P H, Zeng Y, Wang R B, Chen H, Pei X, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 114211

    [5]

    Ma J Z, Beirle S, Jin J L, Shaiganfar R, Yan P, Wagner T 2012 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12 26719

    [6]

    Zhou H J, Liu W Q, Si F Q, Xie P H, Xu J, Dou K 2011 Acta Opt. Sin. 31 1101007 (in Chinese) [周海金, 刘文清, 司福祺, 谢品华, 徐晋, 窦科 2011 光学学报 31 1101007]

    [7]

    Li A, Xie P H, Liu C, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 2859

    [8]

    Fu Q, Liu W Q, Si F Q, Zhang Y H, Xie P H 2009 Acta Photon. Sin. 38 1216 (in Chinese) [付强, 刘文清, 司福祺, 张英华, 谢品华 2009 光子学报 38 1216]

    [9]

    Xu J, Xie P H, Si F Q, Dou K, Li A, Liu Y, Liu W Q 2010 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 30 2464 (in Chinese) [徐晋, 谢品华, 司福祺, 窦科, 李昂, 刘宇, 刘文清 2010 光谱学与光谱分析 30 2464]

    [10]

    Eskes H J, Boersma K F 2003 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 3 895

    [11]

    Irie H, Kanaya Y, Akimoto H, Lwabuchi H, Shimiza A, Aoki K 2008 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 341

    [12]

    Wagner T, Beirle S, Brauers T, Deutschmann T, Frieß U, Hak C, Halla J D, Heue K P, Junkermann W, Li X, Platt U, Pundt-Gruber I 2011 Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. 4 3891

    [13]

    Li X, Brauers T, Hofzumahaus A, Lu K, Li Y P, Shao M, Wagner T, Wahner A 2012 Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12 3983

    [14]

    Frieß U, Sihler H, Sander R, Pohler D, Yilmaz S, Platt U 2011 J. Geophys. Res. 116 D00R04

    [15]

    Sinreich R, Frieß U, Wagner T, Platt U 2005 Faraday Discuss. 130 153

    [16]

    Wang Y, Li A, Xie P H, Chen H, Xu J, Wu F C, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 180705 (in Chinese) [王杨, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 刘建国, 刘文清 2013 62 180705]

    [17]

    Rozanov A, Rozanov V, Buchwitz M, Kokhanovsky A, Burrows J P 2005 Adv. Space Res. 36 1015

    [18]

    Brhl C, Crutzen P J 1993 MPIC Two-Dimensional Model in the Atmospheric Effects of Stratospheric Aircraft (Vol. 1292) (Washington: NASA Ref. Publ.) p103

    [19]

    Rodgers C D 2000 Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, Ser. Atmos. Oceanic Planet. Phys. (Vol. 2) (Hackensack: World Sci. Publ.)

    [20]

    Clemer K, van Roozendael M, Fayt C, Hendrick F, Hermans C, Pinardi G, Spurr R, Wang P, Maziere M D 2010 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 3 863

    [21]

    Frieß U, Monks P S, Remedios J J, Rozanov A, Sinreich R, Wagner T, Platt U 2006 J. Geophys. Res. 111 D14203

    [22]

    Solomon S, Schmeltekopf A L, Sanders R W 1987 J. Geophys. Res. 92 8311

    [23]

    Kraus S 2006 Ph. D. Dissertation (Mannheim: University of Mannheim)

    [24]

    Greenblatt G D, Orlando J J, Burkholder J B, Ravis-hankara A R 1990 J. Geophys. Res. 95 18577

    [25]

    Vandaele A C, Hermans C, Simon P C, Carleer M, Colins R, Fally S, M’erienne M F, Jenouvrier A, Coquart B 1998 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 59 171

    [26]

    Bogumil K, Orphal J, Homann T, Voigt S, Spietz P, Fleischmann O C, Vogel A, Hart-mann M, Bovensmann H, Frerik J, Burrows J P 2003 J. Photoch. Photobio. A 157 157

    [27]

    Meller R and Moortgat G K 2000 J. Geophys. Res. 105 7089

    [28]

    Kneizys F X, Shettle E P, Abreu L W, Chetwynd J H, Anderson G P, Gallery W O, Selby J E A, Clough S A Users Guide to LOWTRAN 7 www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a206773.pdf. [2013-05-10]

  • [1] 孟凡昊, 秦敏, 方武, 段俊, 唐科, 张鹤露, 邵豆, 廖知堂, 谢品华. 基于迭代算法的大气HONO和NO2开放光路宽带腔增强吸收光谱测量.  , 2022, 71(12): 120701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220150
    [2] 刘丹丹, 黄印博, 孙宇松, 卢兴吉, 曹振松. 对流层顶高对拉萨地区温室气体柱浓度反演的影响.  , 2020, 69(13): 130201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191431
    [3] 任红梅, 李昂, 胡肇焜, 黄业园, 徐晋, 谢品华, 钟鸿雁, 李晓梅. 基于多轴差分吸收光谱技术测量青岛市大气水汽垂直柱浓度及垂直分布.  , 2020, 69(20): 204204. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200588
    [4] 冉茂怡, 胡耀垓, 赵正予, 张援农. 高功率微波注入对流层对氟利昂的影响.  , 2017, 66(4): 045101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.045101
    [5] 韩舸, 龚威, 马昕, 相成志, 梁艾琳, 郑玉新. 地基CO2廓线探测差分吸收激光雷达.  , 2015, 64(24): 244206. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.244206
    [6] 刘进, 司福祺, 周海金, 赵敏杰, 窦科, 王煜, 刘文清. 机载成像差分吸收光谱技术测量区域NO2二维分布研究.  , 2015, 64(3): 034217. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034217
    [7] 吴丰成, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 凌六一, 徐晋, 牟福生, 张杰, 申进朝, 刘建国, 刘文清. 车载多轴差分吸收光谱探测对流层NO2分布研究.  , 2015, 64(11): 114211. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.114211
    [8] 王杨, Wagner Thomas, 李昂, 谢品华, 伍德侠, 陈浩, 牟福生, 张杰, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 刘建国, 刘文清, 曾议. 多轴差分吸收光谱技术的云和气溶胶类型鉴别方法研究.  , 2014, 63(11): 110708. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.110708
    [9] 江宇, 盛峥, 石汉青. 基于COSMIC掩星资料的全球第二对流层顶详细特征.  , 2013, 62(3): 039205. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.039205
    [10] 孙友文, 谢品华, 徐晋, 周海金, 刘诚, 王杨, 刘文清, 司福祺, 曾议. 采用加权函数修正的差分光学吸收光谱反演环境大气中的CO2垂直柱浓度.  , 2013, 62(13): 130703. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.130703
    [11] 徐晋, 谢品华, 司福祺, 李昂, 周海金, 吴丰成, 王杨, 刘建国, 刘文清. 基于机载平台的NO2 垂直廓线反演灵敏度研究.  , 2013, 62(10): 104214. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.104214
    [12] 周海金, 刘文清, 司福祺, 窦科. 多轴差分吸收光谱技术测量近地面NO2体积混合比浓度方法研究.  , 2013, 62(4): 044216. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.044216
    [13] 王婷, 王普才, 余环, 张兴赢, 周斌, 司福祺, 王珊珊, 白文广, 周海金, 赵恒. 多轴差分吸收光谱仪反演大气NO2的比对试验.  , 2013, 62(5): 054206. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.054206
    [14] 王杨, 李昂, 谢品华, 陈浩, 徐晋, 吴丰成, 刘建国, 刘文清. 多轴差分吸收光谱技术反演气溶胶消光系数垂直廓线.  , 2013, 62(18): 180705. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.180705
    [15] 程胡华, 钟中, 岑瑾, 邓少格. 估算大气重力波参数的垂直扰动廓线获取新方法.  , 2012, 61(18): 189201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.189201
    [16] 王杨, 谢品华, 李昂, 曾议, 徐晋, 司福祺. 直射太阳光差分吸收光谱法测量合肥NO2 整层柱浓度.  , 2012, 61(11): 114209. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.114209
    [17] 徐晋, 谢品华, 司福祺, 李昂, 刘文清. 机载多轴差分吸收光谱技术获取对流层NO2垂直柱浓度的研究.  , 2012, 61(2): 024204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.024204
    [18] 司福祺, 谢品华, 窦科, 詹铠, 刘宇, 徐晋, 刘文清. 被动多轴差分吸收光谱大气气溶胶光学厚度监测方法研究.  , 2010, 59(4): 2867-2872. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2867
    [19] 王敏, 胡顺星, 方欣, 汪少林, 曹开法, 赵培涛, 范广强, 王英俭. 激光雷达精确修正对流层目标定位误差.  , 2009, 58(7): 5091-5097. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5091
    [20] 周斌, 刘文清, 齐峰, 李振壁, 崔延军. 差分吸收光谱法测量大气污染的浓度反演方法研究.  , 2001, 50(9): 1818-1823. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1818
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7297
  • PDF下载量:  702
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-05-23
  • 修回日期:  2013-07-19
  • 刊出日期:  2013-10-05

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map