Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Electronic properties and modulation effects on edge-modified GeS2 nanoribbons

Li Jing-Hui Cao Sheng-Guo Han Jia-Ning Li Zhan-Hai Zhang Zhen-Hua

Citation:

Electronic properties and modulation effects on edge-modified GeS2 nanoribbons

Li Jing-Hui, Cao Sheng-Guo, Han Jia-Ning, Li Zhan-Hai, Zhang Zhen-Hua
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • GeS2 monolayers have been successfully prepared in this work. To further expand their applications and discover new physical properties, we construct armchair-type GeS2 nanoribbons (AGeS2NR) and use different concentrations of H and O atoms for the edge modificationand their structural stabilities, electronic properties, carrier mobilities, and physical field modulation effects are studied in depth. The results show that the edge-modified nanoribbon has a higher energy and thermal stability. The bare edge nanoribbon is a nonmagnetic semiconductor, while the edge modification can change the bandgap of AGeS2NR and make it a wide or narrowed bandgap semiconductor, or a metal, which is closely related to the elimination or partial elimination of the edge states or the creation of hybridization bands. Thus edge modification extends the application range of nanoribbons in the fields of electronic devices and optical devices. In addition, the carrier mobility is found to be very sensitive to the edge modification: the carriers’ (electrons’ and holes’) mobilities of nanoribbons can be adjusted to a difference of up to one order of magnitude, and the difference in carrier mobility polarization can be tuned to one order of magnitude. Strain effect studies reveal that the semiconducting nanoribbons are robust in keeping the electronic phase unchanged over a wide strain range, which is useful for maintaining the stability of the electron transport in the related device. Most of the semiconducting nanoribbons have the stability to keep the semiconducting properties unchanged under high external electric field, but the bandgap can be reduced significantly with the increase of the electric field. In short, this study provides a theoretical analysis and reference for understanding the property of GeS2 nanoribbons and developing related devices.
      Corresponding author: Cao Sheng-Guo, caoshengguo@stu.csust.edu.cn ; Zhang Zhen-Hua, zhzhang@csust.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61771076) and the Postgraduate Innovation Program of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. CX20200820).
    [1]

    Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhuang J C, Xu X, Feng H F, Li Z, Wang X L, Du Y 2015 Sci. Bull. 60 1551Google Scholar

    [3]

    Tran V, Soklaski R, Liang Y F, Yang L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 817

    [4]

    Zhang S L, Guo S Y, Chen Z F, Wang Y L, Gao H J, Gomez-Herrero J, Ares P, Zamora F, Zhu Z, Zeng H B 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 982Google Scholar

    [5]

    Song L, Ci L J, Lu H, Sorokin P B, Jin C H, Ni J, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Lou J, Yakobson B I, Ajayan P M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3209Google Scholar

    [6]

    Qu H Z, Guo S Y, Zhou W H, Wu Z H, Cao J, Li Z, Zeng H B, Zhang S L 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 075413Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhang S L, Zhou W H, Ma Y D, Ji J P, Cai B, Yang S A, Zhu Z, Chen Z F, Zeng H B 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3434Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li H, Wu J, Yin Z Y, Zhang H 2014 Acc Chem. Res. 47 1067Google Scholar

    [9]

    Radisavljevic B, Kis A 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 815Google Scholar

    [10]

    Qi Y, Naumov P G, Ali M N, Rajamathi C R, Schnelle W, Barkalov O, Hanfland M, Wu S, Shekhar C, Sun Y 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 11038Google Scholar

    [11]

    Nandi P, Rawat A, Ahammed R, Jena N, Sarkar A D 2021 Nanoscale 13 5460Google Scholar

    [12]

    Chen H, Keiser C, Du S, Gao H J, Sutter P, Sutter E 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 32473Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hahn T, Theo 1983 International Tables for Crystallography (Vol. 1) (Dordrecht: Reidel) p182

    [14]

    Wilson E B, Decius J C, Cross P C 1980 Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra (Courier Corporation

    [15]

    Gao R L, Yong Y L, Yuan X B, Hu S, Hou Q H, Kuang Y M 2022 ACS Omega 7 46440Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ruan X Y, Xiong R, Cui Z, Wen C L, Ma J J, Wang B T, Sa B S 2022 Materials 15 4016Google Scholar

    [17]

    Mao Y L, Zhang G H 2020 Physica B 581 411673Google Scholar

    [18]

    Do T N, Hieu N N, Poklonski N A, Nguyen C Q, Hien N D 2021 RSC Adv. 3 28381

    [19]

    Wang X L, Feng W, Shen C, Sun Z H, Qi H B, Yang M, Liu Y H, Wu Y C, Wu X Q 2021 Front. Mater. 8 709757Google Scholar

    [20]

    Son Y W, Cohen M L, Louie S G 2006 Nature 444 347Google Scholar

    [21]

    Gan Y J, Sun L T, Banhart F 2008 Small 4 587Google Scholar

    [22]

    Jippo H, Ohfuchi M J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 183715Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen H L, Zhang L, Deng X Q, Sun L, Zhang Z H, Fan Z Q 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 12904Google Scholar

    [24]

    Brandbyge M, Mozos J L, Ordejon P, Taylor J, Stokbro K 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 165401Google Scholar

    [25]

    徐永虎, 邓小清, 孙琳, 范志强, 张振华 2022 71 046102Google Scholar

    Xu Y H, Deng X Q, Sun L, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 046102Google Scholar

    [26]

    曹胜果, 韩佳凝, 李占海, 张振华 2023 72 117101Google Scholar

    Cao S G, Han J N, Li Z H, Zhang Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 117101Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 636 157766Google Scholar

    [28]

    汤家鑫, 李占海, 邓小清, 张振华 2023 72 167101Google Scholar

    Tang J X, Li Z H, Deng X Q, Zhang Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 167101Google Scholar

    [29]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 614 156095Google Scholar

    [30]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 184413Google Scholar

    [31]

    Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar

    [32]

    Troullier N, Martins J L 1991 Phys. Rev. B 43 1993Google Scholar

    [33]

    Soler J M, Artacho E, Gale J D, Junquera J, Garcia A 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 2745Google Scholar

    [34]

    Biswas R, Hamann D R 1986 Phys. Rev. B 34 895Google Scholar

    [35]

    Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72Google Scholar

    [36]

    Yuan P F, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2017 Carbon 124 228Google Scholar

    [37]

    Long M Q, Tang L, Wang D, Li Y L, Shuai Z G 2011 ACS Nano 5 2593Google Scholar

    [38]

    Beleznay F B, Bogár F, Ladik J, 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 119 5690Google Scholar

    [39]

    Han J N, He X, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 1830Google Scholar

    [40]

    Zhao T, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H, Zhou R L 2019 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52 475301Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhang Z H, Liu X F, Yu J, Hang Y, Li Y, Guo Y F, Xu Y, Sun X, Zhou J X, Guo W L 2016 Wires Comput. Mol. Sci. 6 324Google Scholar

    [42]

    Desai S B, Seol G, Kang J S, Fang H, Battaglia C, Kapadia R 2014 Nano Lett. 14 4592Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a) 2D GeS2原子结构及其能带结构和轨道投影态密度. 优化之后裸边及锯齿型纳米带的几何结构及能带结构 (b) 手性纳米带; (c) Ge-S边缘锯齿型纳米带; (d) S-Ge边缘锯齿型纳米带; (e) S-S边缘锯齿型纳米带. 优化之后扶手椅型纳米带的几何结构 (f) 裸边NR (N0); (g) H-S-NR (N1); (h) H-NR-H (N2); (i) H2H-NR-H2H (N3); (j) H-NR-O2O (N4), (k) H2H-NR-O2O (N5)

    Figure 1.  (a) 2D GeS2 atomic structure and its band structure and orbital projection density. Optimized geometries and its band structure: (b) Chiral nanoribbon; (c) Ge-S edge ZGeS2NR; (d) S-Ge edge ZGeS2NR; (e) S-S edge ZGeS2NR. Optimized geometries: (f) Bare-edged NR (N0); (g) H-S-NR (N1); (h) H-NR-H (N2); (i) H2H-NR-H2H (N3); (j) H-NR-O2O (N4); (k) H2H-NR-O2O (N5).

    图 2  淬火后纳米带的几何结构 (a) N0, (b) N1, (c) N2, (d) N3, (e) N4, (f) N5; 纳米带的电荷密度差 (g) N1, (h) N2, (i) N3, (j) N4, (k) N5; 青色表示失去电子, 洋红色表示得到电子, 等值面为 0.005 e3, 每个图旁边的数字表示H或O获得的电子数量

    Figure 2.  Geometry of quenched nanoribbons: (a) N0, (b) N1, (c) N2, (d) N3, (e) N4, (f) N5. Differential charge densities of nanoribbons: (g) N1, (h) N2, (i) N3, (j) N4, (k) N5. Cyan denotes loss of electrons, magenta denotes gain of electrons, and the isosurfaces are 0.005 e3. Numbers next to each plot denote the number of electrons gained by either H or O.

    图 3  纳米带的能带结构、投影态密度及部分电荷密度 (a) N0, (b) N1, (c) N2, (d) N3, (e) N4, (f) N5, 等值面为 0.02|e–3

    Figure 3.  The band structure, projected density of states and partial charge density for nanoribbons: (a) N0, (b) N1, (c) N2, (d) N3, (e) N4, (f) N5, where equivalent surface is set to 0.02|e| Å–3.

    图 4  半导体性纳米带Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5)沿输运方向的电子和空穴的(a) 有效质量m*, (b) 形变势常数E1和拉伸模量C, (c) 载流子迁移率µ (其中h对应空穴, e对应电子); (d) N1纳米带的CBM和VBM的Bloch态, 等值面为0.05e3

    Figure 4.  (a) Effective mass m*, (b) deformation potential constant E1 and tensile modulus C, (c) carrier mobility μ for electrons and holes in semiconducting nanoribbons Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5) along the transport direction, where h for holes and e for electrons; (d) Bloch states of CBM and VBM for N1 nanoribbon, and the isosurfaces are 0.05e3.

    图 5  (a) 施加应变示意图; (b) 半导体性纳米带Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5) 的应变能与应变的关系. Ni的带边(CBM和VBM) 和电子相随应变ε的演变 (c) N0; (d) N1; (e) N3; (f) N5

    Figure 5.  (a) Schematic diagram of applied strain; (b) strain energy versus strain for semiconducting nanoribbons Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5). Evolution of band edges (CBM and VBM) and electronic phase versus strain ε: (c) N0; (d) N1; (e) N3; (f) N5.

    图 6  N0的应变效应 (a) 能带结构与应变的关系; (b) 键长与键角随应变的变化; (c) 5种典型应变HVB在Z点的布洛赫态, 等值面为 0.04e3; (d) 5种典型应变下边缘上S原子和Ge原子的投影态密度 (PDOS)

    Figure 6.  Strain effects for N0: (a) Band structure versus strain; (b) bond length and bond angle versus strain; (c) Bloch states at the Z point for five typical strains of HVB, with an isosurface of 0.04e3; (d) projected densities of states (PDOS) for S and Ge atoms on the edge at five typical strains.

    图 7  (a) 施加电场示意图; (b) 半导体性纳米带Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5) 的电场能与电场的关系. Ni的带边 (CBM和VBM) 和电子相随电场的演变 (c) N0; (d) N1; (e) N3; (f) N5

    Figure 7.  (a) Schematic diagram of applied external electric field; (b) electric field energy versus electric field for the semiconducting nanoribbons Ni (i = 0, 1, 3, 5). Evolution of band edges (CBM and VBM) and electronic phases of Ni with electric field: (c) N0; (d) N1; (e) N3; (f) N5.

    图 8  N1的电场效应 (a) 能带结构与电场的关系; (b)带隙随电场的变化; (c) 3个典型电场值下, 子带1在Z点的布洛赫态; (d) 3个典型电场值下, 子带2在Z点的布洛赫态, 等值面设为 0.06e3

    Figure 8.  Electric field effects for N1: (a) Band structure versus electric field; (b) band gap versus electric field; (c) Bloch state of subband 1 at the Z point for three typical values of the electric field; (d) Bloch state of subband 2 at the Z point for three typical values of the electric field, with an isosurface of 0.06e3.

    表 1  纳米带Ni (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)的边形成能Ef (单位: eV/Å)和带边缘的几何参数, 即S—Ge键长d1d2 (单位: Å)以及两个边缘S—Ge键之间的夹度θ (单位: (°))

    Table 1.  Edge formation energy Ef (in eV/Å) and geometrical parameters of the ribbon edges for the nanoribbon Ni (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), i.e., S—Ge bond lengths d1 and d2 (in Å) and bond angle θ (in (°)) between the two edge S—Ge bonds.

    Structure N0 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5
    d1 2.44 2.42 2.51 2.49 2.49 2.52
    d2 2.20 2.69 2.53 2.50 2.43 2.40
    θ/(°) 146.64 170.49 175.89 166.77 176.11 179.07
    Ef /(eV·Å–1) 0 –1.293 –1.735 –2.323 –2.704 –2.996
    DownLoad: CSV
    Baidu
  • [1]

    Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Firsov A A 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhuang J C, Xu X, Feng H F, Li Z, Wang X L, Du Y 2015 Sci. Bull. 60 1551Google Scholar

    [3]

    Tran V, Soklaski R, Liang Y F, Yang L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 817

    [4]

    Zhang S L, Guo S Y, Chen Z F, Wang Y L, Gao H J, Gomez-Herrero J, Ares P, Zamora F, Zhu Z, Zeng H B 2018 Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 982Google Scholar

    [5]

    Song L, Ci L J, Lu H, Sorokin P B, Jin C H, Ni J, Kvashnin A G, Kvashnin D G, Lou J, Yakobson B I, Ajayan P M 2010 Nano Lett. 10 3209Google Scholar

    [6]

    Qu H Z, Guo S Y, Zhou W H, Wu Z H, Cao J, Li Z, Zeng H B, Zhang S L 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105 075413Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhang S L, Zhou W H, Ma Y D, Ji J P, Cai B, Yang S A, Zhu Z, Chen Z F, Zeng H B 2017 Nano Lett. 17 3434Google Scholar

    [8]

    Li H, Wu J, Yin Z Y, Zhang H 2014 Acc Chem. Res. 47 1067Google Scholar

    [9]

    Radisavljevic B, Kis A 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 815Google Scholar

    [10]

    Qi Y, Naumov P G, Ali M N, Rajamathi C R, Schnelle W, Barkalov O, Hanfland M, Wu S, Shekhar C, Sun Y 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 11038Google Scholar

    [11]

    Nandi P, Rawat A, Ahammed R, Jena N, Sarkar A D 2021 Nanoscale 13 5460Google Scholar

    [12]

    Chen H, Keiser C, Du S, Gao H J, Sutter P, Sutter E 2017 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 32473Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hahn T, Theo 1983 International Tables for Crystallography (Vol. 1) (Dordrecht: Reidel) p182

    [14]

    Wilson E B, Decius J C, Cross P C 1980 Molecular Vibrations: The Theory of Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra (Courier Corporation

    [15]

    Gao R L, Yong Y L, Yuan X B, Hu S, Hou Q H, Kuang Y M 2022 ACS Omega 7 46440Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ruan X Y, Xiong R, Cui Z, Wen C L, Ma J J, Wang B T, Sa B S 2022 Materials 15 4016Google Scholar

    [17]

    Mao Y L, Zhang G H 2020 Physica B 581 411673Google Scholar

    [18]

    Do T N, Hieu N N, Poklonski N A, Nguyen C Q, Hien N D 2021 RSC Adv. 3 28381

    [19]

    Wang X L, Feng W, Shen C, Sun Z H, Qi H B, Yang M, Liu Y H, Wu Y C, Wu X Q 2021 Front. Mater. 8 709757Google Scholar

    [20]

    Son Y W, Cohen M L, Louie S G 2006 Nature 444 347Google Scholar

    [21]

    Gan Y J, Sun L T, Banhart F 2008 Small 4 587Google Scholar

    [22]

    Jippo H, Ohfuchi M J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 113 183715Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen H L, Zhang L, Deng X Q, Sun L, Zhang Z H, Fan Z Q 2021 J. Mater. Chem. C 9 12904Google Scholar

    [24]

    Brandbyge M, Mozos J L, Ordejon P, Taylor J, Stokbro K 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 165401Google Scholar

    [25]

    徐永虎, 邓小清, 孙琳, 范志强, 张振华 2022 71 046102Google Scholar

    Xu Y H, Deng X Q, Sun L, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 046102Google Scholar

    [26]

    曹胜果, 韩佳凝, 李占海, 张振华 2023 72 117101Google Scholar

    Cao S G, Han J N, Li Z H, Zhang Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 117101Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 636 157766Google Scholar

    [28]

    汤家鑫, 李占海, 邓小清, 张振华 2023 72 167101Google Scholar

    Tang J X, Li Z H, Deng X Q, Zhang Z H 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 167101Google Scholar

    [29]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Appl. Surf. Sci. 614 156095Google Scholar

    [30]

    Li Z H, Han J N, Cao S G, Zhang Z H 2023 Phys. Rev. B 108 184413Google Scholar

    [31]

    Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar

    [32]

    Troullier N, Martins J L 1991 Phys. Rev. B 43 1993Google Scholar

    [33]

    Soler J M, Artacho E, Gale J D, Junquera J, Garcia A 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 2745Google Scholar

    [34]

    Biswas R, Hamann D R 1986 Phys. Rev. B 34 895Google Scholar

    [35]

    Bardeen J, Shockley W 1950 Phys. Rev. 80 72Google Scholar

    [36]

    Yuan P F, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2017 Carbon 124 228Google Scholar

    [37]

    Long M Q, Tang L, Wang D, Li Y L, Shuai Z G 2011 ACS Nano 5 2593Google Scholar

    [38]

    Beleznay F B, Bogár F, Ladik J, 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 119 5690Google Scholar

    [39]

    Han J N, He X, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 1830Google Scholar

    [40]

    Zhao T, Fan Z Q, Zhang Z H, Zhou R L 2019 J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 52 475301Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhang Z H, Liu X F, Yu J, Hang Y, Li Y, Guo Y F, Xu Y, Sun X, Zhou J X, Guo W L 2016 Wires Comput. Mol. Sci. 6 324Google Scholar

    [42]

    Desai S B, Seol G, Kang J S, Fang H, Battaglia C, Kapadia R 2014 Nano Lett. 14 4592Google Scholar

  • [1] Wang SongWen, Guo HongXia, Ma Teng, Lei ZhiFeng, Ma WuYing, Zhong XiangLi, Zhang Hong, Lu XiaoJie, Li JiFang, Fang JunLin, Zeng TianXiang. Electrical stress of graphene field effect transistor under different bias voltages Reliability studies. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(23): . doi: 10.7498/aps.20241365
    [2] Wang Song-Wen, Guo Hong-Xia, Ma Teng, Lei Zhi-Feng, Ma Wu-Ying, Zhong Xiang-Li, Zhang Hong, Lu Xiao-Jie, Li Ji-Fang, Fang Jun-Lin, Zeng Tian-Xiang. Electrical stress reliability of graphene field effect transistor under different bias voltages. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(23): 238501. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241365
    [3] Li Jing-Hui, Cao Sheng-Guo, Han Jia-Ning, Li Zhan-Hai, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Electrical contact properties of 2D metal-semiconductor heterojunctions composed of different phases of NbS2 and GeS2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(13): 137102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240530
    [4] Pan Jia-Ping, Zhang Ye-Wen, Li Jun, Lü Tian-Hua, Zheng Fei-Hu. Migration behavior of space charge packet researched by using electron beam irradiation and real-time space charge distribution measurement in piezo-pressure wave propagation (PWP) method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(2): 027701. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231353
    [5] Lu Kang-Jun, Wang Yi-Fan, Xia Qian, Zhang Gui-Tao, Chen Qian. Structural phase transition induced enhancement of carrier mobility of monolayer RuSe2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(14): 146302. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240557
    [6] Han Jia-Ning, Huang Jun-Ming, Cao Sheng-Guo, Li Zhan-Hai, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Magneto-electronic property and strain regulation for non-metal atom doped armchair arsenene nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(19): 197101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230644
    [7] Cao Sheng-Guo, Han Jia-Ning, Li Zhan-Hai, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Structural stability, electronic properties, and physical modulation effects of armchair-edged C3B nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(11): 117101. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222434
    [8] Wang Na, Xu Hui-Fang, Yang Qiu-Yun, Zhang Mao-Lian, Lin Zi-Jing. First-principles study of strain-tunable charge carrier transport properties and optical properties of CrI3 monolayer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(20): 207102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221019
    [9] Tang Jia-Xin, Fan Zhi-Qiang, Deng Xiao-Qing, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Non-metallic atom doped GaN nanotubes: Electronic structure, transport properties, and gate voltage regulating effects. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 116101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212342
    [10] Xu Yong-Hu, Deng Xiao-Qing, Sun Lin, Fan Zhi-Qiang, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Strain engineering of electronic structure and mechanical switch device for edge modified Net-Y nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(4): 046102. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211748
    [11] Fang Wen-Yu, Chen Yue, Ye Pan, Wei Hao-Ran, Xiao Xing-Lin, Li Ming-Kai, Ahuja Rajeev, He Yun-Bin. Elastic constants, electronic structures and thermal conductivity of monolayer XO2 (X = Ni, Pd, Pt). Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(24): 246301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211015
    [12] Zhang Hua-Lin, He Xin, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Magneto-electronic property in zigzag phosphorene nanoribbons doped with transition metal atom. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(5): 056101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201408
    [13] Strain?Engineering of Electronic Structure and Mechanical Switch Device for Edge Modified Net-Y Nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211748
    [14] Wang Dan, Zou Juan, Tang Li-Ming. Stability and electronic structure of hydrogenated two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides: First-principles study. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 037102. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181597
    [15] Liu Ya-Nan, Lu Jun-Zhe, Zhu Heng-Jiang, Tang Yu-Chao, Lin Xiang, Liu Jing, Wang Ting. Structural derivative and electronic properties of zigzag carbon nanotubes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(9): 093601. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.093601
    [16] Deng Fa-Ming. Effect of intense laser irradiation on the electronic properties of 6H-SiC. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10): 107101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.107101
    [17] Deng Fa-Ming. Effect of intense laser irradiation on the electronic properties of 2H-SiC. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(22): 227101. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.227101
    [18] Li Jun, Zhang Zhen-Hua, Wang Chen-Zhi, Deng Xiao-Qing, Fan Zhi-Qiang. Rolling effects on electronic characteristics for graphene nanoribbons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(5): 056103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.056103
    [19] Zeng Yong-Chang, Tian Wen, Zhang Zhen-Hua. Electronic properties of graphene nanoribbons with periodical nanoholes passivated by oxygen. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 236102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.236102
    [20] Zeng Zhen-Hua, Deng Hui-Qiu, Li Wei-Xue, Hu Wang-Yu. Density function theory calculation of oxygen adsorption on Au(111) surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 3157-3164. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3157
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  1966
  • PDF Downloads:  66
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  18 October 2023
  • Accepted Date:  21 November 2023
  • Available Online:  08 December 2023
  • Published Online:  05 March 2024

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map