-
The compositing of porous medium and phase change material is an effective way to improve the heat transfer performance of solid-liquid phase change energy storage system. In this paper, we reconstruct the three-dimensional numerical structure of the copper foam by using the micro computed tomography, and then conduct the pore-scale numerical simulation of the melting process in a cubic cavity filled with the phase change material comprised of the copper foam via the lattice Boltzmann method. The effects of the hollow skeleton on the melting process are discussed in detail under different Rayleigh numbers and ratios of thermal conductivity of the copper foam to that of the phase change material. The results show that the hollow skeleton copper foam possesses a lower average Nusselt number along the left wall at the early stage of the melting process, a slower melting rate, and a higher energy storage efficiency than the solid skeleton copper foam. Comparing with the skeleton region of the copper foam, the heat transfer rate entering the cubic cavity through the hollow region of the skeleton is almost negligible. Because of the competition between heat conduction and natural convection, the heat transfer enhancement efficiency of copper foam first increases, then decreases, and then increases again with the increase of the Fourier number. When the Rayleigh number decreases, the energy storage efficiency increases, and the natural convection also weakens. Meanwhile, the fluctuation of the heat transfer enhancement efficiency decreases as the Fourier number increases, and the gap of the heat transfer enhancement efficiency between the hollow skeleton copper foam and the solid skeleton copper foam becomes smaller. When the ratio of the thermal conductivity of the copper foam skeleton to that of the phase change material increases, the energy storage efficiency is relatively high at the early stage of the melting process but becomes relatively low when the melting process is completed. With a larger thermal conductivity ratio, the heat transfer rate entering the cubic cavity through the skeleton region of the copper foam becomes dominant, which reduces the effect of the hollow skeleton on heat transfer, and thus the gap of the heat transfer enhancement efficiency between the hollow skeleton copper foam and the solid skeleton copper foam becomes relatively small.
-
Keywords:
- hollow skeleton /
- copper foam /
- micro computed tomography /
- melting
[1] Zhang N, Yuan Y P, Cao X L, Du Y X, Zhang Z L, Gui Y W 2018 Adv. Eng. Mater. 20 1700753Google Scholar
[2] Vélez C, Khayet M, Ortiz de Zárate J M 2015 Appl. Energy 143 383Google Scholar
[3] Su W G, Darkwa J, Kokogiannakis G 2015 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 48 373Google Scholar
[4] Ren Q L, Chan C L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 100 522Google Scholar
[5] Arıcı M, Tütüncü E, Kan M, Karabay H 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 104 7Google Scholar
[6] Luo K, Yao F J, Yi H L, Tan H P 2015 Appl. Therm. Eng. 86 238Google Scholar
[7] 龚玮, 杨震, 段远源 2014 太阳能学报 35 1682Google Scholar
Gong W, Yang Z, Duan Y Y 2014 Acta Energ. Sol. Sin. 35 1682Google Scholar
[8] Ren Q L, Wang Z X, Lai T, Zhang J F, Qu Z G 2021 Appl. Therm. Eng. 189 116618Google Scholar
[9] Yang X H, Bai Q S, Guo Z X, Niu Z Y, Yang C, Jin L W, Lu T J, Yan J Y 2018 Appl. Energy 229 700Google Scholar
[10] 冯妍卉, 冯黛丽, 褚福强, 邱琳, 孙方远, 林林, 张欣欣 2022 71 016501Google Scholar
Feng Y H, Feng D L, Chu F Q, Qiu L, Sun F Y, Lin L, Zhang X X 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 016501Google Scholar
[11] 李静, 李绍伟, 蔡迪, 廖燕宁 2021 70 040503Google Scholar
Li J, Li S W, Cai D, Liao Y N 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 040503Google Scholar
[12] Xiao X, Zhang P, Li M 2013 Appl. Energy 112 1357Google Scholar
[13] 张贝豪, 郑林 2020 69 164401Google Scholar
Zhang B H, Zheng L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 164401Google Scholar
[14] Huang X P, Sun C, Chen Z Q, Han Y S 2021 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 170 107151Google Scholar
[15] Zhang Z Q, He X D 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 113 298Google Scholar
[16] Ghahremannezhad A, Xu H, Salimpour M R, Wang P, Vafai K 2020 Appl. Therm. Eng. 179 115731Google Scholar
[17] Li X Y, Zhu Z L, Xu Z R, Ma T, Zhang H, Liu J, Wang X, Wang Q W 2019 Appl. Energy 254 113507Google Scholar
[18] 张士卫 2016 粉末冶金技术 34 222Google Scholar
Zhang S W 2016 Powder Metall. Technol. 34 222Google Scholar
[19] 张秋利, 杨志懋, 丁秉钧 2009 有色金属 61 30Google Scholar
Zhang Q L, Yang Z M, Ding B J 2009 Nonferrous Met. 61 30Google Scholar
[20] He Y L, Liu Q, Li Q, Tao W Q 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 129 160Google Scholar
[21] Huang R Z, Wu H Y, Adams N A 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 244501Google Scholar
[22] 娄钦, 黄一帆, 李凌 2019 68 214702Google Scholar
Lou Q, Huang Y F, Li L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 214702Google Scholar
[23] Huang R Z 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University) (in Chinese)
[24] d’Humières D 2002 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 360 437Google Scholar
[25] Huang R Z, Wu H Y 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 315 65Google Scholar
-
图 5 融化过程中固液相界面(紫色曲面)位置, 以及右壁面(
$x = 1$ )、后壁面($y = 1$ )、下壁面($z = 0$ )和骨架表面的温度分布 (a) SSCF; (b) HSCFFigure 5. Evolution of the solid-liquid phase interface (the purple surface), the temperature distributions on the right (
$x = 1$ ), back ($y = 1$ ), bottom ($z = 0$ ) walls and skeleton surface during the melting process: (a) SSCF; (b) HSCF.图 7 不同因素随Fourier数Fo的变化 (a) 左壁面平均Nusselt数
$N{u_{{\text{ave}}}}$ ; (b) 方腔内平均液相率${f_{{\text{l, ave}}}}$ ; (c) 储能效率ηFigure 7. Variations of different factors with the Fourier number Fo: (a) Average Nusselt number
$N{u_{{\text{ave}}}}$ along the left wall; (b) average liquid fraction over the whole cavity${f_{{\text{l, ave}}}}$ ; (c) energy storage efficiency η.图 9 不同Ra时, 不同因素随Fourier数Fo的变化 (a) 左壁面平均Nusselt数; (b) 方腔内平均液相率
${f_{{\text{l, ave}}}}$ ; (c) 储能效率η; (d)泡沫铜传热增强效率ζFigure 9. Variations of different factors with the Fourier number Fo at different Ra: (a) Average Nusselt number along the left wall; (b) average liquid fraction over the whole cavity
${f_{{\text{l,ave}}}}$ ; (c) energy storage efficiency η; (d) heat transfer enhancement efficiency of copper foam ζ .图 10 不同
${k_\lambda }$ 时, 不同因素随Fourier数Fo的变化 (a) 左壁面平均Nusselt数$N{u_{{\text{ave}}}}$ ; (b) 方腔内平均液相率${f_{{\text{l,ave}}}}$ ; (c) 储能效率η; (d) 泡沫铜传热增强效率ζFigure 10. Variations of different factors with the Fourier number Fo at different
${k_\lambda }$ : (a) Average Nusselt number along the left wall$N{u_{{\text{ave}}}}$ ; (b) average liquid fraction over the whole cavity${f_{{\text{l, ave}}}}$ ; (c) energy storage efficiency η; (d) heat transfer enhancement efficiency of copper foam ζ. -
[1] Zhang N, Yuan Y P, Cao X L, Du Y X, Zhang Z L, Gui Y W 2018 Adv. Eng. Mater. 20 1700753Google Scholar
[2] Vélez C, Khayet M, Ortiz de Zárate J M 2015 Appl. Energy 143 383Google Scholar
[3] Su W G, Darkwa J, Kokogiannakis G 2015 Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 48 373Google Scholar
[4] Ren Q L, Chan C L 2016 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 100 522Google Scholar
[5] Arıcı M, Tütüncü E, Kan M, Karabay H 2017 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 104 7Google Scholar
[6] Luo K, Yao F J, Yi H L, Tan H P 2015 Appl. Therm. Eng. 86 238Google Scholar
[7] 龚玮, 杨震, 段远源 2014 太阳能学报 35 1682Google Scholar
Gong W, Yang Z, Duan Y Y 2014 Acta Energ. Sol. Sin. 35 1682Google Scholar
[8] Ren Q L, Wang Z X, Lai T, Zhang J F, Qu Z G 2021 Appl. Therm. Eng. 189 116618Google Scholar
[9] Yang X H, Bai Q S, Guo Z X, Niu Z Y, Yang C, Jin L W, Lu T J, Yan J Y 2018 Appl. Energy 229 700Google Scholar
[10] 冯妍卉, 冯黛丽, 褚福强, 邱琳, 孙方远, 林林, 张欣欣 2022 71 016501Google Scholar
Feng Y H, Feng D L, Chu F Q, Qiu L, Sun F Y, Lin L, Zhang X X 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 016501Google Scholar
[11] 李静, 李绍伟, 蔡迪, 廖燕宁 2021 70 040503Google Scholar
Li J, Li S W, Cai D, Liao Y N 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 040503Google Scholar
[12] Xiao X, Zhang P, Li M 2013 Appl. Energy 112 1357Google Scholar
[13] 张贝豪, 郑林 2020 69 164401Google Scholar
Zhang B H, Zheng L 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 164401Google Scholar
[14] Huang X P, Sun C, Chen Z Q, Han Y S 2021 Int. J. Therm. Sci. 170 107151Google Scholar
[15] Zhang Z Q, He X D 2017 Appl. Therm. Eng. 113 298Google Scholar
[16] Ghahremannezhad A, Xu H, Salimpour M R, Wang P, Vafai K 2020 Appl. Therm. Eng. 179 115731Google Scholar
[17] Li X Y, Zhu Z L, Xu Z R, Ma T, Zhang H, Liu J, Wang X, Wang Q W 2019 Appl. Energy 254 113507Google Scholar
[18] 张士卫 2016 粉末冶金技术 34 222Google Scholar
Zhang S W 2016 Powder Metall. Technol. 34 222Google Scholar
[19] 张秋利, 杨志懋, 丁秉钧 2009 有色金属 61 30Google Scholar
Zhang Q L, Yang Z M, Ding B J 2009 Nonferrous Met. 61 30Google Scholar
[20] He Y L, Liu Q, Li Q, Tao W Q 2019 Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 129 160Google Scholar
[21] Huang R Z, Wu H Y, Adams N A 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 244501Google Scholar
[22] 娄钦, 黄一帆, 李凌 2019 68 214702Google Scholar
Lou Q, Huang Y F, Li L 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 214702Google Scholar
[23] Huang R Z 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University) (in Chinese)
[24] d’Humières D 2002 Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 360 437Google Scholar
[25] Huang R Z, Wu H Y 2016 J. Comput. Phys. 315 65Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2663
- PDF Downloads: 72
- Cited By: 0